81 FR 58397 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of Wyoming; Emission Inventory Rule for 2008 Ozone NAAQS and Revisions to Incorporation by Reference
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 165 (August 25, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 165 (August 25, 2016)
| Page Range | 58397-58400 | |
| FR Document | 2016-20315 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 165 (Thursday, August 25, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 58397-58400] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-20315] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R08-OAR-2016-0377; FRL-9951-34-Region 8] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of Wyoming; Emission Inventory Rule for 2008 Ozone NAAQS and Revisions to Incorporation by Reference AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions [[Page 58398]] submitted by the State of Wyoming on July 1, 2014. The submittal requests SIP revisions to the State's Incorporation by reference section as well as an administrative change in section numbering. The submittal also includes the addition of a section establishing requirements for the submittal of emission inventories from facilities or sources located in an ozone nonattainment area. DATES: This rule is effective on October 24, 2016 without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by September 26, 2016. If adverse comments are received, the EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of this direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08- OAR-2016-0377, at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. For additional information on submission of CBI, please see Section II.A below. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chris Dresser, Air Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6385, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule? The EPA is publishing this rule without a prior proposed rule because we view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no adverse comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal Register, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposed rule to approve the SIP revisions if adverse comments are received on this direct final rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. For further information about commenting on this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this document. If the EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this direct final rule will not take effect. We anticipate that we would address all public comments in any subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will consider all comments received, if any, and take appropriate action in accordance with such comments. II. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA? A. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to the EPA through www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. B. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments, remember to:Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number). Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/or data that you used. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and suggest alternatives. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. III. Analysis of the State Submittal In a July 1, 2014 submittal, Wyoming requested revisions affecting the SIP involving Chapter 8, Nonattainment Area Regulations, Section 5, Ozone nonattainment emission inventory rule, and Section 10, Incorporation by reference. Chapter 8, Section 5 of Wyoming's SIP was previously the Incorporation by reference section due to the fact that on August 15, 2013 the EPA approved a revision that reorganized Chapter 8, and added Section 5 (78 FR 49685). In response to the July 1, 2014 submittal, the EPA is now approving a change that will make Section 10 the Incorporation by reference section instead of Section 5. In addition to this administrative change of the Wyoming Incorporation by reference section, the State is seeking to update the language by changing the date of the citation in this Incorporation by reference section from 2011 to 2012. The EPA approves these revisions. Moreover, since Chapter 8, Section 5 is now vacant, Wyoming is seeking to amend its SIP by adding a new emission inventory provision to Section 5. The Ozone Nonattainment Emission Inventory Rule is a new rule to establish requirements for the submittal of emissions inventories from facilities or sources located in an ozone nonattainment area pursuant to the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA), Section 182. The EPA approves this revision. IV. What action is the EPA taking today? The EPA is taking direct final action to approve the SIP revisions submitted by the State of Wyoming on July 1, 2014. The EPA is approving the proposed SIP revisions as a direct final action without prior proposal because the agency views the revisions as noncontroversial and anticipates no adverse comments. However, in the Proposed Rules section of today's Federal Register publication, the EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revisions if adverse comments are filed. This rule will be effective October 24, 2016 without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by September 26, 2016. If the EPA [[Page 58399]] receives adverse comments, the EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. The EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. Please note that if the EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. V. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Wyoming rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth later. Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for inclusion in the State Implementation Plan, have been incorporated by reference by the EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under Sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\ The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials generally available through www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region 8 Office (please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section of this preamble for more information). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VI. Statutory and Executive Orders Review Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state actions, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this direct final action merely approves a state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact in a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. Section 801 et seq, as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. Section 804(2). Under Section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by October 24, 2016. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that the EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See Section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds, Incorporation by reference. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: August 11, 2016. Debra Thomas, Deputy Regional Administrator, Region 8. 40 CFR part 52 is amended to read as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart ZZ--Wyoming 0 2. Section 52.2620, the table in paragraph (c) is amended under ``Chapter 08. Non-attainment Area Regulations.'' by revising the entry for ``Section 05'' and by adding, after ``Section 05'', a new entry for ``Section 10'' to read as follows: [[Page 58400]] Sec. 52.2620 Identification of plan * * * * * (c) * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State EPA effective Final rule Rule no. Rule title effective date date citation/date Comments ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chapter 08. Non-attainment Area Regulations ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * Section 05.................... Ozone 11/22/2013 10/24/2016. [Insert Federal nonattainment Register emission citation]. 8/25/ inventory rule. 2016. Section 10.................... Incorporation by 11/22/2013 10/24/2016. [Insert Federal reference. Register citation]. 8/25/ 2016. * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * [FR Doc. 2016-20315 Filed 8-24-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 58397
Small businesses may send comments do discuss the effects of this rule waters within a 750-foot radius centered
on the actions of Federal employees elsewhere in this preamble. at the following coordinate: 32°43′18″
who enforce, or otherwise determine N., 117°12′11″ W.
F. Environment
compliance with, Federal regulations to (b) Definitions. The following
the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under definition applies to this section:
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security Designated representative means any
and the Regional Small Business Management Directive 023–01 and commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, of the Coast Guard on board Coast
Ombudsman evaluates these actions which guide the Coast Guard in Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, or local,
annually and rates each agency’s complying with the National state, or federal law enforcement vessels
responsiveness to small business. If you Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 that have been authorized to act on the
wish to comment on actions by U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have behalf of the Captain of the Port.
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– determined that this action is one of a (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The category of actions that do not regulations in 33 CFR 165.33, entry into,
Coast Guard will not retaliate against individually or cumulatively have a or movement within this zone is
small entities that question or complain significant effect on the human prohibited unless authorized by the
about this rule or any policy or action environment. This rule involves Captain of the Port San Diego or his
of the Coast Guard. establishment of a security zone lasting designated representative.
only 3 hours on the navigable waters of (2) All persons and vessels shall
C. Collection of Information San Diego Bay. It is categorically comply with the instructions of the
This rule will not call for a new excluded from further review under Coast Guard Captain of the Port or his
collection of information under the paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the designated representative.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 Commandant Instruction. An (3) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
U.S.C. 3501–3520). environmental analysis checklist Guard or designated patrol personnel by
supporting this determination and a siren, radio, flashing light or other
D. Federalism Categorical Exclusion Determination are means, the operator of a vessel shall
A rule has implications for federalism available in the docket where indicated proceed as directed.
under Executive Order 13132, under ADDRESSES. We seek any (4) The Coast Guard may be assisted
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct comments or information that may lead by other federal, state, or local agencies
effect on the States, on the relationship to the discovery of a significant in patrol and notification of the
between the national government and environmental impact from this rule. regulation.
the States, or on the distribution of G. Protest Activities (5) Vessel operators desiring to enter
power and responsibilities among the or operate within this security zone
various levels of government. We have The Coast Guard respects the First shall contact the Captain of the Port or
analyzed this rule under that Order and Amendment rights of protesters. his designated representative via VHF
determined that it is consistent with the Protesters are asked to contact the channel 16 to obtain permission to do
fundamental federalism principles and person listed in the FOR FURTHER so.
INFORMATION CONTACT section to (d) Enforcement period. This section
preemption requirements described in
E.O. 13132. coordinate protest activities so that your will be enforced from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00
message can be received without p.m. on September 10, 2016.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
jeopardizing the safety or security of
implications under Executive Order Dated: August 10, 2016.
people, places or vessels.
13175, Consultation and Coordination J.R. Buzzella,
with Indian Tribal Governments, List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
because it does not have a substantial Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation Port San Diego.
direct effect on one or more Indian (water), Reporting and recordkeeping [FR Doc. 2016–20432 Filed 8–24–16; 8:45 am]
tribes, on the relationship between the requirements, Security measures, BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
Federal Government and Indian tribes, Waterways.
or on the distribution of power and For the reasons discussed in the
responsibilities between the Federal preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Government and Indian tribes. If you CFR part 165 as follows: AGENCY
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 40 CFR Part 52
contact the person listed in the FOR AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section [EPA–R08–OAR–2016–0377; FRL–9951–34–
above. ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 Region 8]
continues to read as follows:
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Approval and Promulgation of Air
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, Quality Implementation Plans; State of
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5,
165.30; Department of Homeland Security
Wyoming; Emission Inventory Rule for
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Delegation No. 0170.01. 2008 Ozone NAAQS and Revisions to
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
Incorporation by Reference
their discretionary regulatory actions. In ■ 2. Add § 165.T11–797 to read as
particular, the Act addresses actions follows: AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
that may result in the expenditure by a Agency (EPA).
State, local, or tribal government, in the § 165.T11–797 Security Zone; San Diego ACTION: Direct final rule.
aggregate, or by the private sector of Bay; San Diego, CA.
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or (a) Location. The following area is a SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
more in any one year. Though this rule security zone: The limits of the security Agency (EPA) is approving State
will not result in such expenditure, we zone will include all the navigable Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:55 Aug 24, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM 25AUR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_58562/page/1.svg)
![58400 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
§ 52.2620 Identification of plan (c) * * *
* * * * *
State effective EPA effective
Rule no. Rule title Final rule citation/date Comments
date date
* * * * * * *
Chapter 08. Non-attainment Area Regulations
* * * * * * *
Section 05 ........... Ozone nonattainment emission in- 11/22/2013 10/24/2016. [Insert Federal Register citation]. 8/
ventory rule. 25/2016.
Section 10 ........... Incorporation by reference ............... 11/22/2013 10/24/2016. [Insert Federal Register citation]. 8/
25/2016.
* * * * * * *
* * * * * some information may not be publicly to the Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR),
[FR Doc. 2016–20315 Filed 8–24–16; 8:45 am] available, i.e., Confidential Business relied on CAIR to satisfy best available
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P Information or other information whose retrofit technology (BART) requirements
disclosure is restricted by statute. for emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO2)
Certain other material, such as and nitrogen oxides (NOX) from electric
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION copyrighted material, is not placed on generating units (EGUs) in the State. On
AGENCY the Internet and will be publicly June 7, 2012, EPA finalized a limited
available only in hard copy form. disapproval of North Carolina’s
40 CFR Part 52 Publicly available docket materials are December 17, 2007, regional haze plan
[EPA–R04–OAR–2015–0449; FRL–9951–25– available either electronically through submission because of deficiencies
Region 4] www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at arising from the State’s reliance on CAIR
the Air Regulatory Management Section, to satisfy certain regional haze
Air Plan Approval; North Carolina; Air Planning and Implementation requirements. See 77 FR 33642. In a
Regional Haze Progress Report Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics separate action taken on June 27, 2012,
Management Division, U.S. EPA finalized a limited approval of
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Environmental Protection Agency, North Carolina’s December 17, 2007,
Agency (EPA).
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., regional haze plan submission, as
ACTION: Final rule. Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA meeting some of the applicable regional
requests that if at all possible, you haze requirements as set forth in
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
contact the person listed in the FOR sections 169A and 169B of the CAA and
Agency (EPA) is approving a State
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision in 40 CFR 51.300–308. See 77 FR 38185.
schedule your inspection. The Regional On October 31, 2014, the State
submitted by the State of North Carolina
Office’s official hours of business are submitted a regional haze plan revision
through the North Carolina Division of
Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to
Air Quality (NC DAQ) on May 31, 2013. to correct the deficiencies identified in
4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.
North Carolina’s May 31, 2013, SIP the June 27, 2012, limited disapproval
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: by replacing reliance on CAIR with
revision (Progress Report) addresses
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA Sean Lakeman, Air Regulatory reliance on the State’s Clean
or Act) and EPA’s rules that require Management Section, Air Planning and Smokestacks Act (CSA) as an alternative
each state to submit periodic reports Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides to NOX and SO2 BART for BART-
and Toxics Management Division, U.S. eligible EGUs formerly subject to CAIR.
describing progress towards reasonable
Environmental Protection Agency,
progress goals (RPGs) established for EPA approved that SIP revision on May
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW.,
regional haze and a determination of the 24, 2016, resulting in a full approval of
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Mr.
adequacy of the state’s existing SIP North Carolina’s regional haze plan. See
Lakeman can be reached by phone at
addressing regional haze (regional haze 81 FR 32652.
(404) 562–9043 and via electronic mail
plan). EPA is approving North Each state is also required to submit
at lakeman.sean@epa.gov.
Carolina’s Progress Report on the basis a progress report in the form of a SIP
that it addresses the progress report and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
revision every five years that evaluates
adequacy determination requirements I. Background progress towards the RPGs for each
for the first implementation period for mandatory Class I Federal area within
Under the Regional Haze Rule,1 each
regional haze. the state and for each mandatory Class
state was required to submit its first
DATES: This rule will be effective implementation plan addressing I Federal area outside the state which
September 26, 2016. regional haze visibility impairment to may be affected by emissions from
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a EPA no later than December 17, 2007. within the state. See 40 CFR 51.308(g).
docket for this action under Docket See 40 CFR 51.308(b). North Carolina Each state is also required to submit, at
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR– submitted its regional haze plan on that the same time as the progress report, a
2015–0449. All documents in the docket date, and like many other states subject determination of the adequacy of its
are listed on the www.regulations.gov existing regional haze plan. See 40 CFR
Web site. Although listed in the index, 1 Located in 40 CFR part 51, subpart P. 51.308(h). The first progress report was
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:55 Aug 24, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM 25AUR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_58562/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2016-08-25 00:34:58
Document Modified: 2016-08-25 00:34:58
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on October 24, 2016 without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by September 26, 2016. If adverse comments are received, the EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of this direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Chris Dresser, Air Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, Mail Code 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6385, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 58397 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Intergovernmental Relations; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides; Volatile Organic Compounds and Incorporation by Reference |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR