81_FR_58572 81 FR 58407 - Natamycin; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance

81 FR 58407 - Natamycin; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 165 (August 25, 2016)

Page Range58407-58410
FR Document2016-20409

This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of the biochemical pesticide natamycin [6,11,28-Trioxatricyclo [22.3.1.05'7 ]octacosa-8,14,16,18,20-pentaene- 25-carboxylic acid, 22-[(3-amino-3,6-dideoxy-p-Dmannopyranosyl)oxy]- 1,3,26-trihydroxy-12-methyl-10-oxo-, (1R,3S,5R,7R,8E,12R,14E,16E,18E,20E, 22R,24S,25R,26S)-] in or on citrus, pome, stone fruit crop groups, avocado, kiwi, mango and pomegranates when used in accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices. DSM Food Specialties, B.V., P.O. Box 1, 2600 MA Delft, The Netherlands (c/o Keller and Heckman, LLP, 1001 G St. NW., Washington, DC 20001) submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to establish a maximum permissible level for residues of natamycin in or on citrus, pome, stone fruit crop groups, avocado, kiwi, mango and pomegranate when used in accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 165 (Thursday, August 25, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 165 (Thursday, August 25, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 58407-58410]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20409]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0811; FRL-9949-03]


Natamycin; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance for residues of the biochemical pesticide natamycin 
[6,11,28-Trioxatricyclo [22.3.1.05'7 ]octacosa-8,14,16,18,20-pentaene-
25-carboxylic acid, 22-[(3-amino-3,6-dideoxy-p-Dmannopyranosyl)oxy]-
1,3,26-trihydroxy-12-methyl-10-oxo-, 
(1R,3S,5R,7R,8E,12R,14E,16E,18E,20E, 22R,24S,25R,26S)-] in or on 
citrus, pome, stone fruit crop groups, avocado, kiwi, mango and 
pomegranates when used in accordance with label directions and good 
agricultural practices. DSM Food Specialties, B.V., P.O. Box 1, 2600 MA 
Delft, The Netherlands (c/o Keller and Heckman, LLP, 1001 G St. NW., 
Washington, DC 20001) submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), requesting an exemption from the 
requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to 
establish a maximum permissible level for residues of natamycin in or 
on citrus, pome, stone fruit crop groups, avocado, kiwi, mango and 
pomegranate when used in accordance with label directions and good 
agricultural practices.

DATES: This regulation is effective August 25, 2016. Objections and 
requests for hearings must be received on or before October 24, 2016, 
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket 
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0811, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory 
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency 
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public 
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through 
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public 
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP 
Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and 
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert McNally, Biopesticides and 
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 
Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email 
address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an 
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. 
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System 
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. 
Potentially affected entities may include:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).

B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?

    You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR 
part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.

C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?

    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a 
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a 
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided 
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify 
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0811 in the subject line on the first 
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must 
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before 
October 24, 2016. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections 
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the 
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of 
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for 
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential 
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without 
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing 
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0811 by one of 
the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit 
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket 
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand 
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the 
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along 
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

    In the Federal Register of April 25, 2016 (81 FR 24044) (FRL-9944-
86), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance 
petition (PP 5F8407) by Keller and Heckman, LLP, 1001 G St. NW., 
Washington, DC 2001 on behalf of

[[Page 58408]]

DSM Food Specialties, B.V., P.O. Box 1, 2600 MA Delft, The Netherlands. 
The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 be amended by establishing 
an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of 
natamycin in or on citrus, pome, stone fruit crop groups, avocado, 
kiwi, mango, and pomegranates, when used in facilities as a post-
harvest fungistat to control certain fungal diseases. That document 
referenced a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner, DSM 
Food Specialties, which is available in the docket, http://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the 
notice of filing.
    Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an 
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a 
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that 
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines 
``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm 
will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, 
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for 
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through 
drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include 
occupational exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in 
establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement 
of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in 
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give special 
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide 
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there 
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and 
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . 
. ''Additionally, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D) requires that the Agency 
consider ``available information concerning the cumulative effects of a 
particular pesticide's residues'' and ``other substances that have a 
common mechanism of toxicity.''
    EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from 
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. First, EPA determines the 
toxicity of pesticides. Second, EPA examines exposure to the pesticide 
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as 
a result of pesticide use in residential settings.

III. Toxicological Profile

    Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the 
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of 
this action and considered its validity, completeness and reliability, 
and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA has also 
considered available information concerning the variability of the 
sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including 
infants and children.

A. Overview of Natamycin

    Natamycin is a naturally occurring compound derived from the common 
soil microorganisms Streptomyces natalensis, Streptomyces lydicus, and 
Streptomyces chattanoogensis. Natamycin was originally discovered in 
Streptomyces natalensis in South Africa in the early 1950s, and was 
subsequently discovered to also occur naturally in North America in 
Streptomyces lydicus and Streptomyces chattanoogensis. It is 
commercially produced by a submerged oxygen-based fermentation of 
Streptomyces natalensis, Streptomyces lydicus, or Streptomyces 
chattanoogensis. Natamycin has been used as a food preservative 
worldwide for over 40 years and is approved as a food additive/
preservative by the European Union, the World Health Organization, and 
individual countries including New Zealand and Australia for use as a 
fungistat to suppress mold on cheese, meats and sausage. In the United 
States, natamycin is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 
as a direct food additive/preservative for the inhibition of mold and 
yeast on the surface of cheeses (21 CFR 172.155) and as an additive to 
the feed and drinking water of broiler chickens to retard the growth of 
specific molds (21 CFR 573.685). Natamycin is also FDA approved for use 
as a treatment to suppress fungal eye infections such as blepharitis, 
conjunctivitis, and keratitis.
    As a biochemical pesticide active ingredient, natamycin is already 
approved for use as a fungistat to prevent and control the germination 
of mold and yeast spores in the growth media of mushrooms produced in 
enclosed mushroom production facilities (77 FR 29543), and to control 
fungal growth post-harvest on pineapples treated indoors (79 FR 75068). 
Natamycin has a non-toxic mode of action, has no effects on fungal 
mycelia, and development of antibiotic resistance to natamycin has not 
been reported during its entire history of use. See the document 
entitled, ``Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) Considerations 
for Natamycin'' (June 16, 2016), available in the docket for this 
action.

B. Biochemical Pesticide Toxicology Data Requirements

    All applicable mammalian toxicology data requirements supporting 
the petition to amend the existing tolerance exemption by adding use as 
a fungicide post-harvest, indoors, on citrus, pome, stone fruit crop 
groups, avocado, kiwi, mango, and pomegranates have been fulfilled. No 
toxic endpoints were established, and no significant toxicological 
effects were observed in any of the acute toxicity studies. In 
addition, studies submitted indicate that natamycin is not genotoxic, 
has no subchronic toxic effects, and is not a developmental toxicant. 
There are no known effects on endocrine systems via oral, dermal, or 
inhalation routes of exposure. For a summary of the data upon which EPA 
relied, and its human health risk assessment based on that data, please 
refer to the document entitled, ``Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 
(FFDCA) Considerations for Natamycin'' (June 16, 2016). This document, 
as well as other relevant information, is available in the docket for 
this action as described under ADDRESSES.

IV. Aggregate Exposures

    In examining aggregate exposure, FFDCA section 408 directs EPA to 
consider available information concerning exposures from the pesticide 
residue in food and all other non-occupational exposures, including 
drinking water from ground water or surface water and exposure through 
pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or buildings (residential and other 
indoor uses).

A. Dietary Exposure

    The proposed use patterns may results in dietary exposure to 
natamycin, however, exposure is expected to be insignificant (see 
document entitled, ``Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) 
Considerations for Natamycin'' (June 16, 2016), available in the docket 
for this action. No significant exposure via drinking water is 
expected; natamycin is applied indoors only. Some dietary exposure to 
natamycin might occur through other nonpesticidal sources as a result 
of its use as a food additive/preservative. Should exposure occur, 
however, minimal to no risk is expected for the general population, 
including infants and children, due to the low toxicity of natamycin as 
demonstrated in the data submitted and evaluated by the Agency, as 
fully explained in the document entitled, ``Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)

[[Page 58409]]

Considerations for Natamycin'' (June 16, 2016), available in the docket 
for this action.

B. Other Non-Occupational Exposure

    Other non-occupational exposure (other than dietary) from 
pesticidal use is not expected because natamycin is not approved for 
residential uses. The active ingredient is applied directly to 
commodities and degrades rapidly. There may be some exposure to 
natamycin as a result of its use as treatment of infections, but 
minimal to no risk is expected for the general population, including 
infants and children, due to the low toxicity of natamycin as 
demonstrated in the data submitted and evaluated by the Agency, as 
fully explained in the document entitled, ``Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) Considerations for Natamycin'' (June 16, 2016), 
available in the docket for this action.

V. Cumulative Effects From Substances With a Common Mechanism of 
Toxicity

    Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering 
whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency 
consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of 
a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances that have a 
common mechanism of toxicity.''
    EPA has not found natamycin to share a common mechanism of toxicity 
with any other substances, and natamycin does not appear to produce a 
toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this 
tolerance action, therefore, EPA has assumed that natamycin does not 
have a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For 
information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a 
common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of 
such chemicals, see EPA's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.

VI. Determination of Safety for U.S. Population, Infants, and Children

    FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides that, in considering the 
establishment of a tolerance or tolerance exemption for a pesticide 
chemical residue, EPA shall assess the available information about 
consumption patterns among infants and children, special susceptibly of 
infants and children to pesticide chemical residues, and the cumulative 
effects on infants and children of the residues and other substances 
with a common mechanism of toxicity. In addition, FFDCA section 
408(b)(2)(C) provides that EPA shall apply an additional tenfold (10X) 
margin of safety for infants and children in the case of threshold 
effects to account for prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the 
completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure unless EPA 
determines that a different margin of safety will be safe for infants 
and children. This additional margin of safety is commonly referred to 
as the Food Quality Protection Act (FQPA) Safety Factor. In applying 
this provision, EPA either retains the default value of 10X, or uses a 
different additional or no safety factor when reliable data are 
available to support a different additional or no safety factor.
    As part of its qualitative assessment, EPA evaluated the available 
toxicity and exposure data for natamycin and considered it validity, 
completeness, and reliability, as well as the relationship of this 
information to human risk. EPA considers the toxicity database to be 
complete and has identified no residual uncertainty with regard to 
prenatal and postnatal toxicity or exposure. No hazard was identified 
based on the available studies, as fully explained in the document 
entitled, ``Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) Considerations 
for Natamycin'' (June 16, 2016), available in the docket for this 
action. Based upon its evaluation, EPA concludes that there are no 
threshold effects of concern to infants, children, or adults when 
natamycin is applied to mushrooms, in enclosed mushroom production 
facilities, and on pineapples, citrus, pome, stone fruit crop groups, 
avocado, kiwi, mango and pomegranates when used in accordance with 
label directions and good agricultural practices. As a result, EPA 
concludes that no additional margin of exposure (safety) is necessary.

VII. Other Considerations

    An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since 
the Agency is establishing an exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance without any numerical limitation. Further, residues are not 
expected on any other crops because natamycin will only be applied 
indoors to these particular crops.

VIII. Conclusions

    Based on its assessment of natamycin, EPA concludes that there is a 
reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general 
population, or to infants and children from aggregate exposure to 
natamycin. Therefore, an amendment to the exemption of a tolerance is 
established for residues of natamycin in or on citrus, pome, stone 
fruit crop groups, avocado, kiwi, mango and pomegranates.
    The Agency is issuing the exemption for residues of natamycin in or 
on citrus, pome, stone fruit crop groups, avocado, kiwi, mango and 
pomegranates instead of limiting this exemption to post-harvest indoor 
applications to citrus, pome, stone fruit crop groups, avocado, kiwi, 
mango and pomegranates because the restrictions are not relevant to the 
FFDCA safety finding for natamycin. Those limitations are related to 
the use of the pesticide and regulated under FIFRA.

IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This final rule establishes a tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) 
in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from 
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and 
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been 
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not 
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning 
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or 
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled 
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety 
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any 
information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork 
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any 
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal 
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and 
Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis 
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this 
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the 
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et 
seq.), do not apply.
    This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food 
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this 
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and 
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions 
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that 
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or 
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national

[[Page 58410]]

government and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has 
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled 
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this 
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded 
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
    This action does not involve any technical standards that would 
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant 
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).

X. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), 
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required 
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and 
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of 
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' 
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: July 19, 2016.
Robert C. McNally,
Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of 
Pesticide Programs.

    Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.


0
2. Revise Sec.  180.1315 to read as follows:


Sec.  180.1315  Natamycin; exemption from the requirement of a 
tolerance.

    An exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established for 
the residues of natamycin in or on mushrooms, pineapples, citrus, pome, 
stone fruit crop groups, avocado, kiwi, mango, and pomegranates when 
used in accordance with label directions and good agricultural 
practices.

[FR Doc. 2016-20409 Filed 8-24-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



                                                            Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2016 / Rules and Regulations                                        58407

                                           Subpart CCC—Virgin Islands                              DATES:  This regulation is effective                  idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
                                                                                                   August 25, 2016. Objections and                       40tab_02.tpl.
                                           ■ 2. Add an undesignated center                         requests for hearings must be received
                                           heading and § 62.13357 to subpart CCC                                                                         C. How can I file an objection or hearing
                                                                                                   on or before October 24, 2016, and must
                                           to read as follows:                                                                                           request?
                                                                                                   be filed in accordance with the
                                                                                                   instructions provided in 40 CFR part                    Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
                                           Air Emissions From Existing Sewage                                                                            U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
                                           Sludge Incineration Units Constructed                   178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
                                                                                                   SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).                           objection to any aspect of this regulation
                                           on or Before October 14, 2010                                                                                 and may also request a hearing on those
                                                                                                   ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
                                           § 62.13357 Identification of plan—negative              identified by docket identification (ID)              objections. You must file your objection
                                           declaration.                                            number EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0811, is                       or request a hearing on this regulation
                                             Letter from the Virgin Islands                        available at http://www.regulations.gov               in accordance with the instructions
                                           Department of Planning and Natural                      or at the Office of Pesticide Programs                provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
                                           Resources, submitted December 1, 2015                   Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)                 proper receipt by EPA, you must
                                           to EPA Regional Administrator Judith A.                 in the Environmental Protection Agency                identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
                                           Enck, certifying that there are no                      Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William                  OPP–2015–0811 in the subject line on
                                           existing Sewage Sludge Incinerator                      Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301               the first page of your submission. All
                                           units in the Territory of the United                    Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC                 objections and requests for a hearing
                                           States Virgin Islands subject to 40 CFR                 20460–0001. The Public Reading Room                   must be in writing, and must be
                                           part 60, subpart MMMM.                                  is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,                  received by the Hearing Clerk on or
                                                                                                   Monday through Friday, excluding legal                before October 24, 2016. Addresses for
                                           [FR Doc. 2016–20307 Filed 8–24–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                   holidays. The telephone number for the                mail and hand delivery of objections
                                           BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
                                                                                                   Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,                and hearing requests are provided in 40
                                                                                                   and the telephone number for the OPP                  CFR 178.25(b).
                                                                                                                                                           In addition to filing an objection or
                                           ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION                                Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
                                                                                                                                                         hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
                                           AGENCY                                                  the visitor instructions and additional
                                                                                                                                                         as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
                                                                                                   information about the docket available
                                           40 CFR Part 180                                                                                               submit a copy of the filing (excluding
                                                                                                   at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
                                                                                                                                                         any Confidential Business Information
                                                                                                   FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                      (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
                                           [EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0811; FRL–9949–03]
                                                                                                   Robert McNally, Biopesticides and                     Information not marked confidential
                                           Natamycin; Exemption From the                           Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),                pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
                                           Requirement of a Tolerance                              Office of Pesticide Programs,                         disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
                                                                                                   Environmental Protection Agency, 1200                 notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
                                           AGENCY:  Environmental Protection                       Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,                    objection or hearing request, identified
                                           Agency (EPA).                                           DC 20460–0001; main telephone                         by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
                                           ACTION: Final rule.                                     number: (703) 305–7090; email address:                2015–0811 by one of the following
                                                                                                   BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov.                                methods:
                                           SUMMARY:   This regulation establishes an                                                                       • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://
                                                                                                   SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                           exemption from the requirement of a                                                                           www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
                                           tolerance for residues of the biochemical               I. General Information                                instructions for submitting comments.
                                           pesticide natamycin [6,11,28-                                                                                 Do not submit electronically any
                                                                                                   A. Does this action apply to me?
                                           Trioxatricyclo [22.3.1.05′7 ]octacosa-                                                                        information you consider to be CBI or
                                           8,14,16,18,20-pentaene-25-carboxylic                       You may be potentially affected by
                                                                                                                                                         other information whose disclosure is
                                           acid, 22-[(3-amino-3,6-dideoxy-p-                       this action if you are an agricultural
                                                                                                                                                         restricted by statute.
                                           Dmannopyranosyl)oxy]-1,3,26-                            producer, food manufacturer, or                         • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
                                           trihydroxy-12-methyl-10-oxo-,                           pesticide manufacturer. The following                 Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
                                           (1R,3S,5R,7R,8E,12R,14E,16E,18E,20E,                    list of North American Industrial                     DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
                                           22R,24S,25R,26S)-] in or on citrus,                     Classification System (NAICS) codes is                NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.
                                           pome, stone fruit crop groups, avocado,                 not intended to be exhaustive, but rather               • Hand Delivery: To make special
                                           kiwi, mango and pomegranates when                       provides a guide to help readers                      arrangements for hand delivery or
                                           used in accordance with label directions                determine whether this document                       delivery of boxed information, please
                                           and good agricultural practices. DSM                    applies to them. Potentially affected                 follow the instructions at http://
                                           Food Specialties, B.V., P.O. Box 1, 2600                entities may include:                                 www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
                                           MA Delft, The Netherlands (c/o Keller                      • Crop production (NAICS code 111).                  Additional instructions on
                                           and Heckman, LLP, 1001 G St. NW.,                          • Animal production (NAICS code                    commenting or visiting the docket,
                                           Washington, DC 20001) submitted a                       112).                                                 along with more information about
                                           petition to EPA under the Federal Food,                    • Food manufacturing (NAICS code                   dockets generally, is available at http://
                                           Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),                         311).                                                 www.epa.gov/dockets.
                                           requesting an exemption from the                           • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
                                           requirement of a tolerance. This                        code 32532).                                          II. Background and Statutory Findings
                                           regulation eliminates the need to                                                                                In the Federal Register of April 25,
                                           establish a maximum permissible level                   B. How can I get electronic access to                 2016 (81 FR 24044) (FRL–9944–86),
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES




                                           for residues of natamycin in or on                      other related information?                            EPA issued a document pursuant to
                                           citrus, pome, stone fruit crop groups,                    You may access a frequently updated                 FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
                                           avocado, kiwi, mango and pomegranate                    electronic version of 40 CFR part 180                 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
                                           when used in accordance with label                      through the Government Printing                       pesticide tolerance petition (PP 5F8407)
                                           directions and good agricultural                        Office’s e-CFR site at http://                        by Keller and Heckman, LLP, 1001 G St.
                                           practices.                                              www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-                            NW., Washington, DC 2001 on behalf of


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   13:55 Aug 24, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00027   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM   25AUR1


                                           58408            Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

                                           DSM Food Specialties, B.V., P.O. Box 1,                 action and considered its validity,                   B. Biochemical Pesticide Toxicology
                                           2600 MA Delft, The Netherlands. The                     completeness and reliability, and the                 Data Requirements
                                           petition requested that 40 CFR part 180                 relationship of this information to                     All applicable mammalian toxicology
                                           be amended by establishing an                           human risk. EPA has also considered                   data requirements supporting the
                                           exemption from the requirement of a                     available information concerning the                  petition to amend the existing tolerance
                                           tolerance for residues of natamycin in or               variability of the sensitivities of major             exemption by adding use as a fungicide
                                           on citrus, pome, stone fruit crop groups,               identifiable subgroups of consumers,                  post-harvest, indoors, on citrus, pome,
                                           avocado, kiwi, mango, and                               including infants and children.                       stone fruit crop groups, avocado, kiwi,
                                           pomegranates, when used in facilities as
                                                                                                   A. Overview of Natamycin                              mango, and pomegranates have been
                                           a post-harvest fungistat to control
                                                                                                                                                         fulfilled. No toxic endpoints were
                                           certain fungal diseases. That document
                                                                                                     Natamycin is a naturally occurring                  established, and no significant
                                           referenced a summary of the petition
                                                                                                   compound derived from the common                      toxicological effects were observed in
                                           prepared by the petitioner, DSM Food
                                                                                                   soil microorganisms Streptomyces                      any of the acute toxicity studies. In
                                           Specialties, which is available in the
                                                                                                   natalensis, Streptomyces lydicus, and                 addition, studies submitted indicate that
                                           docket, http://www.regulations.gov.
                                                                                                   Streptomyces chattanoogensis.                         natamycin is not genotoxic, has no
                                           There were no comments received in
                                                                                                   Natamycin was originally discovered in                subchronic toxic effects, and is not a
                                           response to the notice of filing.
                                              Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA                     Streptomyces natalensis in South Africa               developmental toxicant. There are no
                                           allows EPA to establish an exemption                    in the early 1950s, and was                           known effects on endocrine systems via
                                           from the requirement for a tolerance (the               subsequently discovered to also occur                 oral, dermal, or inhalation routes of
                                           legal limit for a pesticide chemical                    naturally in North America in                         exposure. For a summary of the data
                                           residue in or on a food) only if EPA                    Streptomyces lydicus and Streptomyces                 upon which EPA relied, and its human
                                           determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’              chattanoogensis. It is commercially                   health risk assessment based on that
                                           Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA                       produced by a submerged oxygen-based                  data, please refer to the document
                                           defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a              fermentation of Streptomyces                          entitled, ‘‘Federal Food, Drug, and
                                           reasonable certainty that no harm will                  natalensis, Streptomyces lydicus, or                  Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) Considerations
                                           result from aggregate exposure to the                   Streptomyces chattanoogensis.                         for Natamycin’’ (June 16, 2016). This
                                           pesticide chemical residue, including                   Natamycin has been used as a food                     document, as well as other relevant
                                           all anticipated dietary exposures and all               preservative worldwide for over 40                    information, is available in the docket
                                           other exposures for which there is                      years and is approved as a food                       for this action as described under
                                           reliable information.’’ This includes                   additive/preservative by the European                 ADDRESSES.
                                           exposure through drinking water and in                  Union, the World Health Organization,                 IV. Aggregate Exposures
                                           residential settings, but does not include              and individual countries including New
                                           occupational exposure. Pursuant to                      Zealand and Australia for use as a                      In examining aggregate exposure,
                                           FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in                          fungistat to suppress mold on cheese,                 FFDCA section 408 directs EPA to
                                           establishing or maintaining in effect an                meats and sausage. In the United States,              consider available information
                                           exemption from the requirement of a                     natamycin is approved by the Food and                 concerning exposures from the pesticide
                                           tolerance, EPA must take into account                   Drug Administration (FDA) as a direct                 residue in food and all other non-
                                           the factors set forth in FFDCA section                  food additive/preservative for the                    occupational exposures, including
                                           408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give                 inhibition of mold and yeast on the                   drinking water from ground water or
                                           special consideration to exposure of                    surface of cheeses (21 CFR 172.155) and               surface water and exposure through
                                           infants and children to the pesticide                   as an additive to the feed and drinking               pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or
                                           chemical residue in establishing a                      water of broiler chickens to retard the               buildings (residential and other indoor
                                           tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a               growth of specific molds (21 CFR                      uses).
                                           reasonable certainty that no harm will                  573.685). Natamycin is also FDA                       A. Dietary Exposure
                                           result to infants and children from                     approved for use as a treatment to
                                           aggregate exposure to the pesticide                                                                             The proposed use patterns may
                                                                                                   suppress fungal eye infections such as
                                           chemical residue. . . . ’’Additionally,                                                                       results in dietary exposure to
                                                                                                   blepharitis, conjunctivitis, and keratitis.
                                           FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D) requires                                                                           natamycin, however, exposure is
                                           that the Agency consider ‘‘available                      As a biochemical pesticide active                   expected to be insignificant (see
                                           information concerning the cumulative                   ingredient, natamycin is already                      document entitled, ‘‘Federal Food, Drug,
                                           effects of a particular pesticide’s                     approved for use as a fungistat to                    and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
                                           residues’’ and ‘‘other substances that                  prevent and control the germination of                Considerations for Natamycin’’ (June 16,
                                           have a common mechanism of toxicity.’’                  mold and yeast spores in the growth                   2016), available in the docket for this
                                              EPA performs a number of analyses to                 media of mushrooms produced in                        action. No significant exposure via
                                           determine the risks from aggregate                      enclosed mushroom production                          drinking water is expected; natamycin is
                                           exposure to pesticide residues. First,                  facilities (77 FR 29543), and to control              applied indoors only. Some dietary
                                           EPA determines the toxicity of                          fungal growth post-harvest on                         exposure to natamycin might occur
                                           pesticides. Second, EPA examines                        pineapples treated indoors (79 FR                     through other nonpesticidal sources as a
                                           exposure to the pesticide through food,                 75068). Natamycin has a non-toxic                     result of its use as a food additive/
                                           drinking water, and through other                       mode of action, has no effects on fungal              preservative. Should exposure occur,
                                           exposures that occur as a result of                     mycelia, and development of antibiotic                however, minimal to no risk is expected
                                           pesticide use in residential settings.                  resistance to natamycin has not been                  for the general population, including
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES




                                                                                                   reported during its entire history of use.            infants and children, due to the low
                                           III. Toxicological Profile                              See the document entitled, ‘‘Federal                  toxicity of natamycin as demonstrated
                                              Consistent with FFDCA section                        Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)                  in the data submitted and evaluated by
                                           408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the                      Considerations for Natamycin’’ (June 16,              the Agency, as fully explained in the
                                           available scientific data and other                     2016), available in the docket for this               document entitled, ‘‘Federal Food, Drug,
                                           relevant information in support of this                 action.                                               and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   13:55 Aug 24, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00028   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM   25AUR1


                                                            Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2016 / Rules and Regulations                                        58409

                                           Considerations for Natamycin’’ (June 16,                additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety             groups, avocado, kiwi, mango and
                                           2016), available in the docket for this                 for infants and children in the case of               pomegranates.
                                           action.                                                 threshold effects to account for prenatal                The Agency is issuing the exemption
                                                                                                   and postnatal toxicity and the                        for residues of natamycin in or on
                                           B. Other Non-Occupational Exposure                                                                            citrus, pome, stone fruit crop groups,
                                                                                                   completeness of the database on toxicity
                                              Other non-occupational exposure                      and exposure unless EPA determines                    avocado, kiwi, mango and pomegranates
                                           (other than dietary) from pesticidal use                that a different margin of safety will be             instead of limiting this exemption to
                                           is not expected because natamycin is                    safe for infants and children. This                   post-harvest indoor applications to
                                           not approved for residential uses. The                  additional margin of safety is commonly               citrus, pome, stone fruit crop groups,
                                           active ingredient is applied directly to                referred to as the Food Quality                       avocado, kiwi, mango and pomegranates
                                           commodities and degrades rapidly.                       Protection Act (FQPA) Safety Factor. In               because the restrictions are not relevant
                                           There may be some exposure to                           applying this provision, EPA either                   to the FFDCA safety finding for
                                           natamycin as a result of its use as                     retains the default value of 10X, or uses             natamycin. Those limitations are related
                                           treatment of infections, but minimal to                 a different additional or no safety factor            to the use of the pesticide and regulated
                                           no risk is expected for the general                     when reliable data are available to                   under FIFRA.
                                           population, including infants and                       support a different additional or no
                                           children, due to the low toxicity of                                                                          IX. Statutory and Executive Order
                                                                                                   safety factor.                                        Reviews
                                           natamycin as demonstrated in the data
                                                                                                      As part of its qualitative assessment,                This final rule establishes a tolerance
                                           submitted and evaluated by the Agency,
                                                                                                   EPA evaluated the available toxicity and              under FFDCA section 408(d) in
                                           as fully explained in the document
                                                                                                   exposure data for natamycin and                       response to a petition submitted to the
                                           entitled, ‘‘Federal Food, Drug, and
                                                                                                   considered it validity, completeness,                 Agency. The Office of Management and
                                           Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) Considerations
                                                                                                   and reliability, as well as the                       Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
                                           for Natamycin’’ (June 16, 2016),
                                                                                                   relationship of this information to                   of actions from review under Executive
                                           available in the docket for this action.
                                                                                                   human risk. EPA considers the toxicity                Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
                                           V. Cumulative Effects From Substances                   database to be complete and has                       Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
                                           With a Common Mechanism of Toxicity                     identified no residual uncertainty with               October 4, 1993). Because this action
                                              Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA                     regard to prenatal and postnatal toxicity             has been exempted from review under
                                           requires that, when considering whether                 or exposure. No hazard was identified                 Executive Order 12866, this action is
                                           to establish, modify, or revoke a                       based on the available studies, as fully              not subject to Executive Order 13211,
                                           tolerance, the Agency consider                          explained in the document entitled,                   entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
                                           ‘‘available information’’ concerning the                ‘‘Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act                Regulations That Significantly Affect
                                           cumulative effects of a particular                      (FFDCA) Considerations for Natamycin’’                Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
                                           pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other                        (June 16, 2016), available in the docket              FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
                                           substances that have a common                           for this action. Based upon its                       Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
                                           mechanism of toxicity.’’                                evaluation, EPA concludes that there are              Children from Environmental Health
                                              EPA has not found natamycin to share                 no threshold effects of concern to                    Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
                                           a common mechanism of toxicity with                     infants, children, or adults when                     April 23, 1997). This action does not
                                           any other substances, and natamycin                     natamycin is applied to mushrooms, in                 contain any information collections
                                           does not appear to produce a toxic                      enclosed mushroom production                          subject to OMB approval under the
                                           metabolite produced by other                            facilities, and on pineapples, citrus,                Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
                                           substances. For the purposes of this                    pome, stone fruit crop groups, avocado,               U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require
                                           tolerance action, therefore, EPA has                    kiwi, mango and pomegranates when                     any special considerations under
                                           assumed that natamycin does not have                    used in accordance with label directions              Executive Order 12898, entitled
                                           a common mechanism of toxicity with                     and good agricultural practices. As a                 ‘‘Federal Actions to Address
                                           other substances. For information                       result, EPA concludes that no additional              Environmental Justice in Minority
                                           regarding EPA’s efforts to determine                    margin of exposure (safety) is necessary.             Populations and Low-Income
                                           which chemicals have a common                           VII. Other Considerations                             Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
                                           mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate                                                                         1994).
                                           the cumulative effects of such                            An analytical method is not required                   Since tolerances and exemptions that
                                           chemicals, see EPA’s Web site at http://                for enforcement purposes since the                    are established on the basis of a petition
                                           www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.                      Agency is establishing an exemption                   under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
                                                                                                   from the requirement of a tolerance                   the tolerance in this final rule, do not
                                           VI. Determination of Safety for U.S.                    without any numerical limitation.                     require the issuance of a proposed rule,
                                           Population, Infants, and Children                       Further, residues are not expected on                 the requirements of the Regulatory
                                              FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides                  any other crops because natamycin will                Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
                                           that, in considering the establishment of               only be applied indoors to these                      seq.), do not apply.
                                           a tolerance or tolerance exemption for a                particular crops.                                        This final rule directly regulates
                                           pesticide chemical residue, EPA shall                                                                         growers, food processors, food handlers,
                                                                                                   VIII. Conclusions
                                           assess the available information about                                                                        and food retailers, not States or tribes,
                                           consumption patterns among infants                        Based on its assessment of natamycin,               nor does this action alter the
                                           and children, special susceptibly of                    EPA concludes that there is a reasonable              relationships or distribution of power
                                           infants and children to pesticide                       certainty that no harm will result to the             and responsibilities established by
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES




                                           chemical residues, and the cumulative                   general population, or to infants and                 Congress in the preemption provisions
                                           effects on infants and children of the                  children from aggregate exposure to                   of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such,
                                           residues and other substances with a                    natamycin. Therefore, an amendment to                 the Agency has determined that this
                                           common mechanism of toxicity. In                        the exemption of a tolerance is                       action will not have a substantial direct
                                           addition, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C)                    established for residues of natamycin in              effect on States or tribal governments,
                                           provides that EPA shall apply an                        or on citrus, pome, stone fruit crop                  on the relationship between the national


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   13:55 Aug 24, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00029   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM   25AUR1


                                           58410            Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

                                           government and the States or tribal                     accordance with label directions and                     Pursuant to WCPFC Conservation and
                                           governments, or on the distribution of                  good agricultural practices.                          Management Measure 2015–01, NMFS
                                           power and responsibilities among the                    [FR Doc. 2016–20409 Filed 8–24–16; 8:45 am]           issued regulations that established a
                                           various levels of government or between                 BILLING CODE 6560–50–P                                limit of 1,828 fishing days that may be
                                           the Federal Government and Indian                                                                             used by U.S. purse seine fishing vessels
                                           tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined                                                                       in the ELAPS in calendar year 2016 (see
                                           that Executive Order 13132, entitled                    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                interim rule at 81 FR 33147, published
                                           ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,                                                                       May 25, 2016, codified at 50 CFR
                                           1999) and Executive Order 13175,                        National Oceanic and Atmospheric                      300.223). The ELAPS consists of the
                                           entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination                Administration                                        areas of the U.S. exclusive economic
                                           with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR                                                                       zone and the high seas that are in the
                                           67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply                   50 CFR Part 300                                       Convention Area between the latitudes
                                           to this action. In addition, this action                                                                      of 20° N. and 20° S. (see definition at
                                                                                                   [Docket No. 160322276–6276–01]
                                           does not impose any enforceable duty or                                                                       50 CFR 300.211). A fishing day means
                                           contain any unfunded mandate as                         RIN 0648–XE741                                        any day in which a fishing vessel of the
                                           described under Title II of the Unfunded                                                                      United States equipped with purse seine
                                           Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.                    International Fisheries; Western and                  gear searches for fish, deploys a fish
                                           1501 et seq.).                                          Central Pacific Fisheries for Highly                  aggregating device (FAD), services a
                                              This action does not involve any                     Migratory Species; Closure of Purse                   FAD, or sets a purse seine, with the
                                           technical standards that would require                  Seine Fishery in the ELAPS in 2016                    exception of setting a purse seine solely
                                           Agency consideration of voluntary                       AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries                    for the purpose of testing or cleaning the
                                           consensus standards pursuant to section                 Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and                  gear and resulting in no catch (see
                                           12(d) of the National Technology                        Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),                    definition at 50 CFR 300.211).
                                           Transfer and Advancement Act                            Commerce.                                                Based on data submitted in logbooks
                                           (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).                           ACTION: Temporary rule; fishery closure.              and other available information, NMFS
                                           X. Congressional Review Act                                                                                   expects that the limit of 1,828 fishing
                                                                                                   SUMMARY:   NMFS announces that the                    days in the ELAPS will be reached, and
                                             Pursuant to the Congressional Review                  purse seine fishery in the Effort Limit               in accordance with the procedures
                                           Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will                    Area for Purse Seine, or ELAPS, will                  established at 50 CFR 300.223(a),
                                           submit a report containing this rule and                close as a result of reaching the 2016                announces that the purse seine fishery
                                           other required information to the U.S.                  limit on purse seine fishing effort in the            in the ELAPS will be closed starting at
                                           Senate, the U.S. House of                               ELAPS. This action is necessary for the               00:00 on September 2, 2016 UTC, and
                                           Representatives, and the Comptroller                    United States to implement provisions                 will remain closed until 24:00 on
                                           General of the United States prior to                   of a conservation and management                      December 31, 2016 UTC. Accordingly, it
                                           publication of the rule in the Federal                  measure adopted by the Commission for                 shall be prohibited for any fishing vessel
                                           Register. This action is not a ‘‘major                  the Conservation and Management of                    of the United States equipped with
                                           rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).                   Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the                   purse seine gear to be used for fishing
                                           List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180                     Western and Central Pacific Ocean                     in the ELAPS from 00:00 on September
                                                                                                   (WCPFC or Commission) and to satisfy                  2, 2016 UTC until 24:00 December 31,
                                             Environmental protection,                             the obligations of the United States                  2016 UTC, except that such vessels will
                                           Administrative practice and procedure,                  under the Convention on the                           not prohibited from bunkering in the
                                           Agricultural commodities, Pesticides                    Conservation and Management of                        ELAPS during that period (50 CFR
                                           and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping                  Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the                   300.223(a)).
                                           requirements.                                           Western and Central Pacific Ocean
                                             Dated: July 19, 2016.                                 (Convention), to which it is a                        Classification
                                           Robert C. McNally,                                      Contracting Party.                                      There is good cause under 5 U.S.C.
                                           Director, Biopesticides and Pollution                   DATES: Effective 00:00 on September 2,                553(b)(B) to waive prior notice and
                                           Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide                2016 universal time coordinated (UTC),                opportunity for public comment on this
                                           Programs.                                               until 24:00 on December 31, 2016 UTC.                 action. Compliance with the notice and
                                             Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is                        FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom                  comment requirement would be
                                           amended as follows:                                     Graham, NMFS Pacific Islands Regional                 impracticable and contrary to the public
                                                                                                   Office, 808–725–5032.                                 interest, since NMFS would be unable
                                           PART 180—[AMENDED]                                      SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: U.S. purse                 to ensure that the 2016 limit on purse
                                                                                                   seine fishing in the area of application              seine fishing effort in the ELAPS is not
                                           ■ 1. The authority citation for part 180                of the Convention, or Convention Area,                exceeded. This action is based on the
                                           continues to read as follows:                           is managed, in part, under the Western                best available information on U.S. purse
                                               Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.          and Central Pacific Fisheries                         seine fishing effort in the ELAPS. The
                                           ■ 2. Revise § 180.1315 to read as                       Convention Implementation Act (16                     action is necessary for the United States
                                           follows:                                                U.S.C. 6901 et seq.). Regulations                     to comply with its obligations under the
                                                                                                   implementing the Act are at 50 CFR part               Convention and is important for the
                                           § 180.1315 Natamycin; exemption from the                300, subpart O. On behalf of the                      conservation and management of bigeye
                                           requirement of a tolerance.                             Secretary of Commerce, NMFS                           tuna, yellowfin tuna, and skipjack tuna
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES




                                             An exemption from the requirement                     promulgates regulations under the Act                 in the western and central Pacific
                                           of a tolerance is established for the                   as may be necessary to carry out the                  Ocean. For the same reasons, there is
                                           residues of natamycin in or on                          obligations of the United States under                good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to
                                           mushrooms, pineapples, citrus, pome,                    the Convention, including                             establish an effective date less than 30
                                           stone fruit crop groups, avocado, kiwi,                 implementation of the decisions of the                days after the date of publication of this
                                           mango, and pomegranates when used in                    Commission.                                           notice.


                                      VerDate Sep<11>2014   13:55 Aug 24, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00030   Fmt 4700   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\25AUR1.SGM   25AUR1



Document Created: 2016-08-25 00:35:08
Document Modified: 2016-08-25 00:35:08
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesThis regulation is effective August 25, 2016. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before October 24, 2016, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ContactRobert McNally, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email
FR Citation81 FR 58407 
CFR AssociatedEnvironmental Protection; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Agricultural Commodities; Pesticides and Pests and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR