81 FR 58435 - Determination of Attainment by the Attainment Date for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards; Pennsylvania; Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 165 (August 25, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 165 (August 25, 2016)
| Page Range | 58435-58438 | |
| FR Document | 2016-20313 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 165 (Thursday, August 25, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 58435-58438] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-20313] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R03-OAR-2016-0368; FRL-9951-26-Region 3] Determination of Attainment by the Attainment Date for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards; Pennsylvania; Pittsburgh- Beaver Valley AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to determine that the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley, Pennsylvania marginal ozone nonattainment area (the Pittsburgh Area) has attained the 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) by the July 20, 2016 attainment date. This proposed determination is based on complete, certified, and quality assured ambient air quality monitoring data for the Pittsburgh Area for the 2013-2015 monitoring period. This proposed determination does not constitute a redesignation to attainment. This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 26, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03- OAR-2016-0368 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria A. Pino, (215) 814-2181, or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: [[Page 58436]] I. Background A. Statutory Requirement--Determination of Attainment by the Attainment Date Section 181(b)(2) of the CAA requires EPA to determine, within 6 months of an ozone nonattainment area's attainment date, whether that area attained the ozone standard by that date. Section 181(b)(2) of the CAA also requires that areas that have not attained the standard by their attainment deadlines be reclassified to either the next higher classification (e.g., marginal to moderate, moderate to serious, etc.) or to the classifications applicable to the areas' design values in Table 1 of 40 CFR 51.1103. CAA section 181(a)(5) provides a mechanism by which the EPA Administrator may grant a 1-year extension of an area's attainment deadline, provided that the relevant states meet certain criteria. B. The Pittsburgh Area and Its Attainment Date On July 18, 1997, EPA promulgated a revised ozone NAAQS of 0.08 parts per million (ppm), averaged over eight hours. 62 FR 38855. This standard was determined to be more protective of public health than the previous 1979 1-hour ozone standard. In 2008, EPA revised the 8-hour ozone NAAQS from 0.08 to 0.075 ppm (the 2008 ozone NAAQS). See 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008). In a May 21, 2012 final rule, the Pittsburgh Area was designated as marginal nonattainment for the more stringent 2008 ozone NAAQS, effective on July 20, 2012. 77 FR 30088. The Pittsburgh Area consists of Allegheny, Armstrong, Beaver, Butler, Fayette, Washington, and Westmoreland Counties in Pennsylvania. See 40 CFR 81.339. In a separate rulemaking action, also published on May 21, 2012 and effective on July 20, 2012, EPA established the air quality thresholds that define the classifications assigned to all nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (the Classifications Rule). 77 FR 30160. This rule also established December 31 of each relevant calendar year as the attainment date for all nonattainment area classification categories. Section 181 of the CAA provides that the attainment deadline for ozone nonattainment areas is ``as expeditiously as practicable'' but no later than the prescribed dates that are provided in Table 1 of that section. In the Classifications Rule, EPA translated the deadlines in Table 1 of CAA section 181 for purposes of the 2008 standard by measuring those deadlines from the effective date of the new designations, but extended those deadlines by several months to December 31 of the corresponding calendar year. Pursuant to a challenge of EPA's interpretation of the attainment deadlines, on December 23, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) issued a decision rejecting, among other things, the Classifications Rule's attainment deadlines for the 2008 ozone nonattainment areas, finding that EPA did not have statutory authority under the CAA to extend those deadlines to the end of the calendar year. NRDC v. EPA, 777 F.3d 456, 464-69 (D.C. Cir. 2014). Accordingly, as part of the final SIP Requirements Rule for the 2008 ozone NAAQS (80 FR 12264, March 6, 2015), EPA modified the maximum attainment dates for all nonattainment areas for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, consistent with the D.C. Circuit's decision. The State Implementation Plan (SIP) Requirements Rule established a maximum deadline for marginal nonattainment areas of three years from the effective date of designation, or July 20, 2015, to attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS. See 80 FR at 12268; 40 CFR 51.1103. In a final rulemaking action published on May 4, 2016, EPA determined that the Pittsburgh Area did not attain the 2008 ozone NAAQS by its July 20, 2015 attainment date, based on ambient air quality monitoring data for the 2012-2014 monitoring period. In that same action, EPA determined that the Pittsburgh Area qualified for a 1-year extension of its attainment date, as provided in section 181(a)(5) of the CAA and interpreted by regulation at 40 CFR 51.1107. The new attainment date for the Pittsburgh Area is July 20, 2016. See 81 FR 26697 (May 4, 2016). II. EPA's Analysis of the Relevant Air Quality Data Under EPA regulations at 40 CFR part 50, appendix P, the 2008 ozone NAAQS is attained at a monitoring site when the three-year average of the annual fourth highest daily maximum 8-hour average ambient air quality ozone concentration is less than or equal to 0.075 ppm. This three-year average is referred to as the design value. When the design value is less than or equal to 0.075 ppm at each ambient air quality monitoring site within the area, then the area is deemed to be meeting the NAAQS. The rounding convention under 40 CFR part 50, appendix P dictates that concentrations shall be reported in ppm to the third decimal place, with additional digits to the right being truncated. Thus, a computed three-year average ozone concentration of 0.0759 ppm or lower would meet the standard, but 0.0760 ppm or higher is over the standard. EPA's determination of attainment is based upon data that has been collected and quality-assured in accordance with 40 CFR part 58 and recorded in EPA's Air Quality System (AQS) database. Ambient air quality monitoring data for the three-year period must meet a data completeness requirement. The ambient air quality monitoring data completeness requirement is met when the three-year average of the percent (%) of required monitoring days with valid ambient monitoring data is greater than 90%, and no single year has less than 75% data completeness, as determined according to appendix P of part 50. Tables 1 and 2 show the data completeness and ozone design values, respectively, for each monitor in the Pittsburgh Area for the years 2013-2015. Table 1--2013-2015 Pittsburgh Area Ozone Monitor Data Completeness ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ County Site ID Percent data completeness 2013-2015 average percent Comment completeness ------------------------------------------------ 2013 2014 2015 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Allegheny.................................... 420030008 98 100 95 98 420030010 100 .............. .............. 33 Site shut down in 2013.\a\ 420030067 99 99 100 99 -------------------------------- 420031005 98 .............. .............. 33 97 Site shut down in 2013.\b\ 420031008 .............. 100 93 64 Site started 2014.\b\ -------------------------------- Armstrong.................................... 420050001 95 100 100 98 Beaver....................................... 420070002 98 96 97 97 [[Page 58437]] 420070005 96 95 93 95 420070014 89 99 94 94 Washington................................... 421250005 98 100 97 98 421250200 98 98 100 98 421255001 100 98 94 97 421255200 99 99 .............. 66 Site shut down in 2015.\a\ Westmoreland................................. 421290006 98 38 .............. 45 Site shut down in July 2014.\a\ 421290008 97 99 97 98 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Notes: \a\ The monitoring site shutdowns and startups are included in the Pennsylvania Department of the Environment's (PADEP's) July 2014 Annual Network Plan. PADEP submitted the monitoring plan to EPA on June 27, 2014, and EPA approved it on November 21, 2014. \b\ The ozone monitor at monitoring site 420031005 was moved to monitoring site 420031008 in February 2014. The new location is about one quarter of a mile away from the previous location, and is at a similar elevation. The data from these sites will be combined to calculate a valid design value. This monitor move was included in the Allegheny County Health Department's (ACHD's) July 2014 monitoring plan, which ACHD submitted to EPA on July 1, 2014, and which EPA approved on November 21, 2014. As shown in Table 1, several monitoring sites do not meet the completeness criteria set out in 40 CFR part 50, appendix P. However, the reasons for the completeness issues were either monitor shutdowns or startup, approved into PADEP's and ACHD's monitoring plans. Because three years of complete data is not possible at these monitoring sites, EPA does not look for valid design values at these sites. However, the circumstances are different for monitoring sites 420031005 and 420031008. The ozone monitor was moved from monitoring site 420031005 to monitoring site 420031008. These sites are within 0.25 miles of each other, and are at similar elevations. Therefore, EPA is able to consider the data at both monitoring sites as representing the same area, and can combine the data for these two locations to calculate a valid design value. When data from both locations is considered, the three-year average completeness is 97%. Table 2--2013-2015 Pittsburgh Area 2008 Ozone Design Values ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4th highest daily maximum 2013-2015 County Site ID ------------------------------------------------ Design value 2013 2014 2015 (ppm) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Allegheny....................... 420030008 0.070 0.065 0.071 0.068 420030010 0.075 .............. .............. .............. 420030067 0.066 0.065 0.068 0.066 420031005 0.076 0.042 .............. 0.073 420031008 .............. 0.071 0.074 .............. Armstrong....................... 420050001 0.078 0.068 0.070 0.072 Beaver.......................... 420070002 0.072 0.069 0.070 0.070 420070005 0.072 0.070 0.067 0.069 420070014 0.066 0.066 0.063 0.065 Washington...................... 421250005 0.064 0.065 0.072 0.067 421250200 0.067 0.064 0.069 0.066 421255001 0.071 0.064 0.071 0.068 421255200 0.063 0.062 0.045 .............. Westmoreland.................... 421290006 0.067 0.053 .............. .............. 421290008 0.070 0.064 0.069 0.067 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Only valid design values for monitors meeting the completeness criteria are shown. Consistent with the requirements contained in 40 CFR part 50, EPA has reviewed the ozone ambient air quality monitoring data for the monitoring period from 2013 through 2015 for the Pittsburgh Area, as recorded in the AQS database. As shown in Table 2, all valid 2013-2015 design values are less than or equal to 0.075 ppm. Therefore, the Pittsburgh Area has attained the 2008 ozone NAAQS, considering 2013- 2015 data. III. Proposed Action EPA evaluated ozone data from air quality monitors in the Pittsburgh Area in order to determine the area's attainment status under the 2008 ozone NAAQS. State and local agencies responsible for ozone air monitoring networks supplied and quality assured the data. All the monitoring sites with valid data had design values equal to or less than 0.075 ppm based on the 2013-2015 monitoring period. Considering that review, EPA has concluded that this area attained the 2008 ozone NAAQS based on complete, quality assured and certified data for the 2013-2015 ozone seasons. Thus, EPA proposes to determine, in accordance with its statutory obligations under section 181(b)(2)(A) of the CAA and the provisions of the SIP Requirements Rule (40 CFR 51.1103), that the Pittsburgh Area attained the 2008 ozone NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of July 20, 2016. This proposed determination of attainment does not constitute a redesignation to attainment. Redesignations require states to meet a number of additional criteria, including EPA approval of a state plan to maintain the air quality standard for 10 years after redesignation. EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document. These comments will be considered before taking final action. IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews This rulemaking action proposes to make a determination of attainment on the 2008 ozone NAAQS based on air quality and, if finalized, would not impose additional requirements. For that reason, this proposed determination of attainment: [[Page 58438]]Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this proposed rule, proposing to determine that the Pittsburgh Area attained the 2008 ozone NAAQS by its July 20, 2016 attainment date, does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because this proposed determination of attainment does not apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Ozone, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: August 12, 2016. Shawn M. Garvin, Regional Administrator, Region III. [FR Doc. 2016-20313 Filed 8-24-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2016 / Proposed Rules 58435
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION information about CBI or multimedia SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
AGENCY submissions, and general guidance on Agency (EPA) is proposing to determine
making effective comments, please visit that the Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley,
40 CFR Part 52 http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ Pennsylvania marginal ozone
[EPA–R05–OAR–2016–0169; FRL–9951–28– commenting-epa-dockets. nonattainment area (the Pittsburgh
Region 5] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Area) has attained the 2008 ozone
Joseph Ko, Environmental Engineer, national ambient air quality standards
Air Plan Approval; Indiana; RACM Attainment, Planning and Maintenance (NAAQS) by the July 20, 2016
Determination for Indiana Portion of Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), attainment date. This proposed
the Cincinnati-Hamilton 1997 Annual Environmental Protection Agency, determination is based on complete,
PM2.5 Nonattainment Area Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, certified, and quality assured ambient
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–7947, air quality monitoring data for the
Agency (EPA). ko.joseph@epa.gov. Pittsburgh Area for the 2013–2015
ACTION: Proposed rule. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the monitoring period. This proposed
Rules and Regulations section of this determination does not constitute a
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Federal Register, EPA is approving the redesignation to attainment. This action
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve state’s SIP submittal as a direct final is being taken under the Clean Air Act
the reasonably available control rule without prior proposal because the (CAA).
measures (RACM) and reasonably Agency views this as a noncontroversial
available control technology (RACT) submittal and anticipates no adverse DATES: Written comments must be
analysis that Indiana submitted as part comments. A detailed rationale for the received on or before September 26,
of their earlier attainment plan for the approval is set forth in the direct final 2016.
1997 fine particulate matter (PM2.5) rule. If no adverse comments are
standard, in accordance with Indiana’s received in response to this rule, no ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
request dated February 11, 2016. The further activity is contemplated. If EPA identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
RACM/RACT analysis addresses RACM receives adverse comments, the direct OAR–2016–0368 at http://
and RACT for the Indiana portion of the final rule will be withdrawn and all www.regulations.gov, or via email to
Cincinnati-Hamilton nonattainment area public comments received will be fernandez.cristina@epa.gov. For
for the 1997 PM2.5 standard. EPA is not addressed in a subsequent final rule comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
proposing to act on the portions of the based on this proposed rule. EPA will follow the online instructions for
state implementation plan (SIP) revision not institute a second comment period. submitting comments. Once submitted,
that are unrelated to RACM/RACT. Any parties interested in commenting comments cannot be edited or removed
Other portions of the attainment plan on this action should do so at this time. from Regulations.gov. For either manner
have either been addressed or will be Please note that if EPA receives adverse of submission, EPA may publish any
addressed in future rulemaking actions. comment on an amendment, paragraph, comment received to its public docket.
DATES: Comments must be received on or section of this rule and if that Do not submit electronically any
or before September 26, 2016. provision may be severed from the information you consider to be
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt confidential business information (CBI)
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– as final those provisions of the rule that or other information whose disclosure is
OAR–2016–0169 at http:// are not the subject of an adverse restricted by statute. Multimedia
www.regulations.gov or via email to comment. For additional information, submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
aburano.douglas@epa.gov. For see the direct final rule which is located accompanied by a written comment.
comments submitted at Regulations.gov, in the Rules and Regulations section of
follow the online instructions for The written comment is considered the
this Federal Register. official comment and should include
submitting comments. Once submitted,
Dated: August 9, 2016. discussion of all points you wish to
comments cannot be edited or removed
from Regulations.gov. For either manner Robert Kaplan, make. EPA will generally not consider
of submission, EPA may publish any Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. comments or comment contents located
comment received to its public docket. [FR Doc. 2016–20311 Filed 8–24–16; 8:45 am] outside of the primary submission (i.e.
Do not submit electronically any BILLING CODE 6560–50–P on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
information you consider to be system). For additional submission
Confidential Business Information (CBI) methods, please contact the person
or other information whose disclosure is ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION identified in the FOR FURTHER
restricted by statute. Multimedia AGENCY INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be full EPA public comment policy,
40 CFR Part 52
accompanied by a written comment. information about CBI or multimedia
The written comment is considered the [EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0368; FRL–9951–26– submissions, and general guidance on
official comment and should include Region 3] making effective comments, please visit
discussion of all points you wish to http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
make. EPA will generally not consider Determination of Attainment by the
commenting-epa-dockets.
comments or comment contents located Attainment Date for the 2008 Ozone
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
outside of the primary submission (i.e. National Ambient Air Quality FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing Standards; Pennsylvania; Pittsburgh- Maria A. Pino, (215) 814–2181, or by
system). For additional submission Beaver Valley email at pino.maria@epa.gov.
methods, please contact the person AGENCY: Environmental Protection SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
identified in the FOR FURTHER Agency (EPA).
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
ACTION: Proposed rule.
full EPA public comment policy,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:57 Aug 24, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25AUP1.SGM 25AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_58600/page/1.svg)
![58438 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2016 / Proposed Rules
• Does not impose an information ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION EPA public comment policy,
collection burden under the provisions AGENCY information about CBI or multimedia
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 submissions, and general guidance on
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 40 CFR Part 52 making effective comments, please visit
• is certified as not having a [EPA–R08–OAR–2013–0145; FRL–9951–30– http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
significant economic impact on a Region 8] commenting-epa-dockets.
substantial number of small entities Docket: All documents in the docket
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 Approval and Promulgation of Air are listed in the www.regulations.gov
U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Quality Implementation Plans; North index. Although listed in the index,
Dakota; Revisions to Air Pollution some information is not publicly
• does not contain any unfunded Control Rules available, e.g., CBI or other information
mandate or significantly or uniquely whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
affect small governments, as described AGENCY: Environmental Protection Certain other material, such as
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Agency (EPA). copyrighted material, will be publicly
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); ACTION: Proposed rule. available only in hard copy. Publicly
• does not have federalism available docket materials are available
implications as specified in Executive SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
either electronically in
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
1999); State Implementation Plan (SIP)
the Air Program, Environmental
revisions submitted by the State of
• is not an economically significant North Dakota on January 28, 2013 and
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8,
regulatory action based on health or 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
April 22, 2014. The revisions are to
safety risks subject to Executive Order 80202–1129. The EPA requests that if at
Article 33–15 ‘‘Air Pollution Control’’
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); all possible, you contact the individual
rules of the North Dakota
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
• is not a significant regulatory action Administrative Code. The revisions
CONTACT section to view the hard copy
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR include amendments to update the
of the docket. You may view the hard
28355, May 22, 2001); Prevention of Significant Deterioration
copy of the docket Monday through
• is not subject to requirements of (PSD) rules and the definition of
Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding
section 12(d) of the National ‘‘volatile organic compounds’’; to add
federal holidays.
Technology Transfer and Advancement particulate matter less than 2.5 microns
in diameter (PM2.5) methods of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because Jaslyn Dobrahner, Air Program, U.S.
application of those requirements would measurement; to modify the PM2.5 state
ambient air quality standard, Environmental Protection Agency
be inconsistent with the CAA; and (EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR,
permissible open burning rule, and
• does not provide EPA with the permit fee processes; and, to remove 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
discretionary authority to address, as permitting fees for sources that operate 80202–1129, (303) 312–6252,
appropriate, disproportionate human an air monitoring site. The revisions dobrahner.jaslyn@epa.gov.
health or environmental effects, using also make clarifying changes. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
practicable and legally permissible action is being taken under section 110
methods, under Executive Order 12898 I. General Information
of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). What should I consider as I prepare my
DATES: Written comments must be
In addition, this proposed rule, received on or before September 26, comments for EPA?
proposing to determine that the 2016. 1. Submitting Confidential Business
Pittsburgh Area attained the 2008 ozone
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, Information (CBI). Do not submit CBI to
NAAQS by its July 20, 2016 attainment
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08– the EPA through http://
date, does not have tribal implications
OAR–2013–0145 at http:// www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly
as specified by Executive Order 13175
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online mark the part or all of the information
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
instructions for submitting comments. that you claim to be CBI. For CBI
because this proposed determination of
Once submitted, comments cannot be information on a disk or CD–ROM that
attainment does not apply in Indian
edited or removed from regulations.gov. you mail to the EPA, mark the outside
country located in the state, and EPA
The EPA may publish any comment of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then
notes that it will not impose substantial
received to its public docket. Do not identify electronically within the disk or
direct costs on tribal governments or
submit electronically any information CD–ROM the specific information that
preempt tribal law.
you consider to be Confidential is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Business Information (CBI) or other complete version of the comment that
information whose disclosure is includes information claimed as CBI, a
Environmental protection, Air restricted by statute. Multimedia copy of the comment that does not
pollution control, Ozone, Incorporation submissions (audio, video, etc.,) must be contain the information claimed as CBI
by reference, Intergovernmental accompanied by a written comment. must be submitted for inclusion in the
relations, Reporting and recordkeeping The written comment is considered the public docket. Information so marked
requirements. official comment and should include will not be disclosed except in
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. discussion of all points you wish to accordance with procedures set forth in
make. The EPA will generally not 40 CFR part 2.
Dated: August 12, 2016.
consider comments or comment 2. Tips for preparing your comments.
Shawn M. Garvin, When submitting comments, remember
contents located outside of the primary
Regional Administrator, Region III. submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or to:
[FR Doc. 2016–20313 Filed 8–24–16; 8:45 am] other file sharing system). For • Identify the rulemaking by docket
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P additional submission methods, the full number and other identifying
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:57 Aug 24, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\25AUP1.SGM 25AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_58600/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2016-08-25 00:34:44
Document Modified: 2016-08-25 00:34:44
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Written comments must be received on or before September 26, 2016. | |
| Contact | Maria A. Pino, (215) 814-2181, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 58435 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Ozone; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR