81_FR_58639 81 FR 58474 - Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Amended Final Determination Pursuant to Court Decision

81 FR 58474 - Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Amended Final Determination Pursuant to Court Decision

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 165 (August 25, 2016)

Page Range58474-58475
FR Document2016-20428

On July 14, 2016, the United States Court of International Trade (``CIT'') sustained the redetermination made by the Department of Commerce (``Department'') pursuant to the CIT's remand of the final determination in the antidumping duty (``AD'') investigation on drawn stainless steel sinks (``sinks'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). Specifically, the CIT affirmed the Department's reliance on Thai data to value stainless steel inputs and revised calculation of selling, general, administrative (``SG&A'') expenses on redetermination. Accordingly, the Department is hereby notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the final affirmative determination in the underlying AD investigation and, as there is a now a final and conclusive decision in this case, is amending the final determination with respect to the dumping margins determined for Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Company, Ltd. (``Dongyuan''), Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd. and Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd. (collectively, ``Superte''), as well as all other companies that received a separate rate.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 165 (Thursday, August 25, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 165 (Thursday, August 25, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58474-58475]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20428]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-983]


Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China: 
Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Amended Final 
Determination Pursuant to Court Decision

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce

SUMMARY: On July 14, 2016, the United States Court of International 
Trade (``CIT'') sustained the redetermination made by the Department of 
Commerce (``Department'') pursuant to the CIT's remand of the final 
determination in the antidumping duty (``AD'') investigation on drawn 
stainless steel sinks (``sinks'') from the People's Republic of China 
(``PRC''). Specifically, the CIT affirmed the Department's reliance on 
Thai data to value stainless steel inputs and revised calculation of 
selling, general, administrative (``SG&A'') expenses on 
redetermination. Accordingly, the Department is hereby notifying the 
public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the 
final affirmative determination in the underlying AD investigation and, 
as there is a now a final and conclusive decision in this case, is 
amending the final determination with respect to the dumping margins 
determined for Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Company, Ltd. 
(``Dongyuan''), Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd. and Zhongshan Superte 
Kitchenware Co., Ltd. (collectively, ``Superte''), as well as all other 
companies that received a separate rate.

DATES: Effective July 24, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eve Wang, Office III, Enforcement and 
Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20230; telephone: (202) 482-6231.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Subsequent to the publication of the Final Determination \1\ in the 
underlying AD investigation of sinks from the PRC, Dongyuan (a 
respondent in the underlying investigation) and Elkay Manufacturing 
Company (the petitioner in the underlying investigation) filed 
complaints with the CIT challenging aspects of the methodology used to 
determine the dumping margins in the Final Determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic 
of China: Investigation, Final Determination, 78 FR 13019 (February 
26, 2013), as amended by Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the 
People's Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at 
Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 78 FR 21592 (April 
11, 2013), (collectively, ``Final Determination'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 22, 2014, the CIT granted the Department's partial 
voluntary remand request to reconsider the use of Global Trade Atlas 
(``GTA'') import data for Thailand to value cold-rolled stainless steel 
coil, and also directed the Department to reconsider its methodology of 
accounting for SG&A expenses in the normal value calculations.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Elkay Mfg. Co. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 13-
00176, Slip Op. 14-150 (CIT 2014) (``Sinks Remand''), at 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to the CIT's instructions on remand, the Department 
further evaluated the information on the record regarding the valuation 
of cold-rolled stainless steel coil inputs and determined to continue 
to use the GTA import data for Thailand to value these inputs.\3\ 
Furthermore, in compliance with the remand directive, the Department 
classified SG&A labor items as SG&A expenses in each company's 
surrogate financial ratio calculation, resulting in a change to the 
margins calculated for each respondent.\4\ On July 14, 2016, the CIT 
affirmed the remand redetermination.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court 
Remand, dated April 22, 2015 (``Final Redetermination''), at 6 and 
24.
    \4\ Id.
    \5\ See Elkay Mfg. Co. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 13-
00176, Slip Op. 16-69 (CIT 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337, 341 (Fed. Cir. 1990) 
(``Timken''), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. 
United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (``Diamond Sawblades''), 
the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (``CAFC'') 
held that, pursuant to section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (``the Act''), the Department must publish a notice of a court 
decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a Department determination and 
must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court 
decision. The CIT's July 14, 2016, judgment in this case constitutes a 
final court decision that is not in harmony with the Department's Final 
Determination. This notice is published in fulfillment of the 
publication requirements of Timken.

Amended Final Determination

    As a result of the Court's final decision with respect to this 
case, the Department is amending the Final Determination with respect 
to Dongyuan, Superte, and all other companies that received a separate 
rate in the Final Determination. The revised weighted-average dumping 
margins for the July 1, 2011, through December 31, 2011, period of 
investigation are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
            Exporter                     Producer         average margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware    Zhongshan Superte                 50.11
 Co., Ltd./Zhongshan Superte      Kitchenware Co., Ltd.
 Kitchenware Co., Ltd. invoiced
 as Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co.,
 Ltd.
Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware   Guangdong Dongyuan                36.59
 Industrial Co., Ltd.             Kitchenware Industrial
                                  Co., Ltd.
B&R Industries Limited.........  Xinhe Stainless Steel             43.35
                                  Products Co., Ltd. and
                                  Jiamen XHHL Stainless
                                  Steel Manufacturing
                                  Co., Ltd.

[[Page 58475]]

 
Elkay (China) Kitchen            Elkay (China) Kitchen             43.35
 Solutions, Co., Ltd.             Solutions, Co., Ltd.
Feidong Import and Export Co.,   Jiangmen Liantai                  43.35
 Ltd.                             Kitchen Equipment Co.;
                                  Jiangmen Xinhe
                                  Stainless Steel
                                  Product Co., Ltd.
Foshan Shunde MingHao Kitchen    Foshan Shunde MingHao             43.35
 Utensils Co., Ltd.               Kitchen Utensils Co.,
                                  Ltd.
Franke Asia Sourcing Ltd.......  Guangdong YingAo                  43.35
                                  Kitchen Utensils Co.,
                                  Ltd.; Franke (China)
                                  Kitchen System Co.,
                                  Ltd.
Grand Hill Work Company........  Zhongshan Xintian                 43.35
                                  Hardware Co., Ltd.
Guangdong G-Top Import and       Jiangmen Jin Ke Ying              43.35
 Export Co., Ltd.                 Stainless Steel Wares
                                  Co., Ltd.
Guangdong Yingao Kitchen         Guangdong Yingao                  43.35
 Utensils Co., Ltd.               Kitchen Utensils Co.,
                                  Ltd.
Hangzhou Heng's Industries Co.,  Hangzhou Heng's                   43.35
 Ltd.                             Industries Co., Ltd.
J&C Industries Enterprise        Zhongshan Superte                 43.35
 Limited.                         Kitchenware Co., Ltd.
Jiangmen Hongmao Trading Co.,    Xinhe Stainless Steel             43.35
 Ltd.                             Products Co., Ltd.
Jiangmen New Star Hi-Tech        Jiangmen New Star Hi-             43.35
 Enterprise Ltd.                  Tech Enterprise Ltd.
Jiangmen Pioneer Import &        Jiangmen Ouert Kitchen            43.35
 Export Co., Ltd.                 Appliance
                                  Manufacturing Co.,
                                  Ltd.; Jiangmen XHHL
                                  Stainless Steel
                                  Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
Jiangxi Zoje Kitchen & Bath      Jiangxi Offidun                   43.35
 Industry Co., Ltd.               Industry Co. Ltd.
Ningbo Oulin Kitchen Utensils    Ningbo Oulin Kitchen              43.35
 Co., Ltd.                        Utensils Co., Ltd.
Primy Cooperation Limited......  Primy Cooperation                 43.35
                                  Limited.
Shenzhen Kehuaxing Industrial    Shenzhen Kehuaxing                43.35
 Ltd.\6\.                         Industrial Ltd.
Shunde Foodstuffs Import &       Bonke Kitchen &                   43.35
 Export Company Limited of        Sanitary Industrial
 Guangdong.                       Co., Ltd.
Zhongshan Newecan Enterprise     Zhongshan Xintian                 43.35
 Development Corporation.         Hardware Co., Ltd.
Zhuhai Kohler Kitchen &          Zhuhai Kohler Kitchen &           43.35
 Bathroom Products Co., Ltd.      Bathroom Products Co.,
                                  Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    Since the Final Determination, the Department has established a new 
cash deposit rate for Dongyuan, Superte, Guangdong Yingao Kitchen 
Utensils Co., Ltd., and Zhongshan Newecan Enterprise Development 
Corporation, and further determined that Feidong Import & Export Co., 
Ltd. is no longer eligible for a separate rate and is considered part 
of the PRC-wide entity.\7\ Therefore, this amended final determination 
does not change the later-established cash deposit rates for those 
exporters. All other companies identified in the table above do not 
have a superseding cash deposit rate and, therefore, the Department 
will issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection, adjusting the cash deposit rate for these separate-rate 
companies to 43.35 percent, effective July 24, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Though Shenzhen Kehuaxing Industrial Ltd. was not granted a 
separate rate at the time of the Final Determination, it was later 
determined to be eligible for a separate in the underlying 
investigation in a prior amended final determination and Timken 
notice. See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic 
of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final 
Determination of Antidumping Duty Investigation, 79 FR 63079 
(October 22, 2014).
    \7\ See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic 
of China: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review; 2012-2014, 80 FR 69644 (November 10, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(e)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: August 5, 2016.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2016-20428 Filed 8-24-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P



                                                    58474                             Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2016 / Notices

                                                      For more information on the EU-U.S.                              decision in this case, is amending the                     determined to continue to use the GTA
                                                    Privacy Shield Framework, please visit                             final determination with respect to the                    import data for Thailand to value these
                                                    www.privacyshield.gov.                                             dumping margins determined for                             inputs.3 Furthermore, in compliance
                                                      Dated: August 17, 2016.                                          Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware                             with the remand directive, the
                                                    Praveen Dixit,
                                                                                                                       Industrial Company, Ltd. (‘‘Dongyuan’’),                   Department classified SG&A labor items
                                                                                                                       Foshan Zhaoshun Trade Co., Ltd. and                        as SG&A expenses in each company’s
                                                    Acting Assistant Secretary for Industry and
                                                    Analysis, International Trade Administration,
                                                                                                                       Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co.,                         surrogate financial ratio calculation,
                                                    U.S. Department of Commerce.                                       Ltd. (collectively, ‘‘Superte’’), as well as               resulting in a change to the margins
                                                    [FR Doc. 2016–20421 Filed 8–24–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                       all other companies that received a                        calculated for each respondent.4 On July
                                                                                                                       separate rate.                                             14, 2016, the CIT affirmed the remand
                                                    BILLING CODE P
                                                                                                                       DATES: Effective July 24, 2016.                            redetermination.5
                                                                                                                       FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eve                       Timken Notice
                                                    DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                             Wang, Office III, Enforcement and
                                                                                                                       Compliance, International Trade                               In Timken Co. v. United States, 893
                                                    International Trade Administration                                 Administration, U.S. Department of                         F.2d 337, 341 (Fed. Cir. 1990)
                                                                                                                       Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution                     (‘‘Timken’’), as clarified by Diamond
                                                    [A–570–983]
                                                                                                                       Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;                          Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United
                                                    Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the                               telephone: (202) 482–6231.                                 States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
                                                    People’s Republic of China: Notice of                              SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                                 (‘‘Diamond Sawblades’’), the United
                                                    Court Decision Not in Harmony With                                                                                            States Court of Appeals for the Federal
                                                    Amended Final Determination                                        Background                                                 Circuit (‘‘CAFC’’) held that, pursuant to
                                                    Pursuant to Court Decision                                            Subsequent to the publication of the                    section 516A(e) of the Tariff Act of
                                                                                                                       Final Determination 1 in the underlying                    1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), the
                                                    AGENCY:    Enforcement and Compliance,                             AD investigation of sinks from the PRC,                    Department must publish a notice of a
                                                    International Trade Administration,                                Dongyuan (a respondent in the                              court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’
                                                    Department of Commerce                                             underlying investigation) and Elkay                        with a Department determination and
                                                    SUMMARY: On July 14, 2016, the United                              Manufacturing Company (the petitioner                      must suspend liquidation of entries
                                                    States Court of International Trade                                in the underlying investigation) filed                     pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision.
                                                    (‘‘CIT’’) sustained the redetermination                            complaints with the CIT challenging                        The CIT’s July 14, 2016, judgment in
                                                    made by the Department of Commerce                                 aspects of the methodology used to                         this case constitutes a final court
                                                    (‘‘Department’’) pursuant to the CIT’s                             determine the dumping margins in the                       decision that is not in harmony with the
                                                    remand of the final determination in the                           Final Determination.                                       Department’s Final Determination. This
                                                    antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) investigation                               On December 22, 2014, the CIT                           notice is published in fulfillment of the
                                                    on drawn stainless steel sinks (‘‘sinks’’)                         granted the Department’s partial                           publication requirements of Timken.
                                                    from the People’s Republic of China                                voluntary remand request to reconsider                     Amended Final Determination
                                                    (‘‘PRC’’). Specifically, the CIT affirmed                          the use of Global Trade Atlas (‘‘GTA’’)
                                                    the Department’s reliance on Thai data                             import data for Thailand to value cold-                      As a result of the Court’s final
                                                    to value stainless steel inputs and                                rolled stainless steel coil, and also                      decision with respect to this case, the
                                                    revised calculation of selling, general,                           directed the Department to reconsider                      Department is amending the Final
                                                    administrative (‘‘SG&A’’) expenses on                              its methodology of accounting for SG&A                     Determination with respect to
                                                    redetermination. Accordingly, the                                  expenses in the normal value                               Dongyuan, Superte, and all other
                                                    Department is hereby notifying the                                 calculations.2                                             companies that received a separate rate
                                                    public that the final judgment in this                                Pursuant to the CIT’s instructions on                   in the Final Determination. The revised
                                                    case is not in harmony with the final                              remand, the Department further                             weighted-average dumping margins for
                                                    affirmative determination in the                                   evaluated the information on the record                    the July 1, 2011, through December 31,
                                                    underlying AD investigation and, as                                regarding the valuation of cold-rolled                     2011, period of investigation are as
                                                    there is a now a final and conclusive                              stainless steel coil inputs and                            follows:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Weighted-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        average
                                                                                         Exporter                                                                          Producer                                      margin
                                                                                                                                                                                                                       (percent)

                                                    Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd./Zhongshan Superte                                Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd ................................         50.11
                                                      Kitchenware Co., Ltd. invoiced as Foshan Zhaoshun Trade
                                                      Co., Ltd.
                                                    Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd .............                         Guangdong Dongyuan Kitchenware Industrial Co., Ltd ............                 36.59
                                                    B&R Industries Limited ...............................................................   Xinhe Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd. and Jiamen XHHL                        43.35
                                                                                                                                               Stainless Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

                                                       1 See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the                        3 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    People’s Republic of China: Investigation, Final                   to Court Remand, dated April 22, 2015 (‘‘Final
                                                    Determination, 78 FR 13019 (February 26, 2013), as                 Redetermination’’), at 6 and 24.
                                                    amended by Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the                      4 Id.
                                                    People’s Republic of China: Amended Final                            5 See Elkay Mfg. Co. v. United States, Consol.
                                                    Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
                                                    Antidumping Duty Order, 78 FR 21592 (April 11,                     Court No. 13–00176, Slip Op. 16–69 (CIT 2016).
                                                    2013), (collectively, ‘‘Final Determination’’).
                                                       2 See Elkay Mfg. Co. v. United States, Consol.

                                                    Court No. 13–00176, Slip Op. 14–150 (CIT 2014)
                                                    (‘‘Sinks Remand’’), at 3.



                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014      18:54 Aug 24, 2016       Jkt 238001    PO 00000      Frm 00007       Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM    25AUN1


                                                                                     Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 165 / Thursday, August 25, 2016 / Notices                                                                     58475

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                Weighted-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 average
                                                                                        Exporter                                                                              Producer                                            margin
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                (percent)

                                                    Elkay (China) Kitchen Solutions, Co., Ltd ..................................           Elkay (China) Kitchen Solutions, Co., Ltd .................................                43.35
                                                    Feidong Import and Export Co., Ltd ...........................................         Jiangmen Liantai Kitchen Equipment Co.; Jiangmen Xinhe                                     43.35
                                                                                                                                              Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd.
                                                    Foshan Shunde MingHao Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd ..................                     Foshan Shunde MingHao Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd .................                          43.35
                                                    Franke Asia Sourcing Ltd ...........................................................   Guangdong YingAo Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd.; Franke (China)                                43.35
                                                                                                                                              Kitchen System Co., Ltd.
                                                    Grand Hill Work Company ..........................................................     Zhongshan Xintian Hardware Co., Ltd ......................................                 43.35
                                                    Guangdong G-Top Import and Export Co., Ltd ..........................                  Jiangmen Jin Ke Ying Stainless Steel Wares Co., Ltd .............                          43.35
                                                    Guangdong Yingao Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd ............................                Guangdong Yingao Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd ...........................                     43.35
                                                    Hangzhou Heng’s Industries Co., Ltd .........................................          Hangzhou Heng’s Industries Co., Ltd ........................................               43.35
                                                    J&C Industries Enterprise Limited ..............................................       Zhongshan Superte Kitchenware Co., Ltd ................................                    43.35
                                                    Jiangmen Hongmao Trading Co., Ltd ........................................             Xinhe Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd ...................................                43.35
                                                    Jiangmen New Star Hi-Tech Enterprise Ltd ...............................               Jiangmen New Star Hi-Tech Enterprise Ltd ..............................                    43.35
                                                    Jiangmen Pioneer Import & Export Co., Ltd ..............................               Jiangmen Ouert Kitchen Appliance Manufacturing Co., Ltd.;                                  43.35
                                                                                                                                              Jiangmen XHHL Stainless Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
                                                    Jiangxi Zoje Kitchen & Bath Industry Co., Ltd ...........................              Jiangxi Offidun Industry Co. Ltd ................................................          43.35
                                                    Ningbo Oulin Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd ......................................          Ningbo Oulin Kitchen Utensils Co., Ltd .....................................               43.35
                                                    Primy Cooperation Limited .........................................................    Primy Cooperation Limited ........................................................         43.35
                                                    Shenzhen Kehuaxing Industrial Ltd.6 .........................................          Shenzhen Kehuaxing Industrial Ltd ...........................................              43.35
                                                    Shunde Foodstuffs Import & Export Company Limited of                                   Bonke Kitchen & Sanitary Industrial Co., Ltd ............................                  43.35
                                                       Guangdong.
                                                    Zhongshan Newecan Enterprise Development Corporation ......                            Zhongshan Xintian Hardware Co., Ltd ......................................                 43.35
                                                    Zhuhai Kohler Kitchen & Bathroom Products Co., Ltd ...............                     Zhuhai Kohler Kitchen & Bathroom Products Co., Ltd ..............                          43.35



                                                    Cash Deposit Requirements                                          Dated: August 5, 2016.                                                            On July
                                                                                                                                                                                      SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                       Since the Final Determination, the                            Ronald K. Lorentzen,                        25, 2016, the Department of Commerce
                                                    Department has established a new cash                            Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement  (the Department) published the
                                                    deposit rate for Dongyuan, Superte,                              and Compliance.                             Antidumping Duty Orders on certain
                                                    Guangdong Yingao Kitchen Utensils                                [FR Doc. 2016–20428 Filed 8–24–16; 8:45 am] corrosion-resistant steel products from
                                                                                                                                                                 India, Italy, the People’s Republic of
                                                    Co., Ltd., and Zhongshan Newecan                                 BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
                                                                                                                                                                 China (PRC), the Republic of Korea
                                                    Enterprise Development Corporation,
                                                                                                                                                                 (Korea), and Taiwan.1 The Antidumping
                                                    and further determined that Feidong
                                                                                                                     DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                      Duty Orders contained unintended
                                                    Import & Export Co., Ltd. is no longer
                                                                                                                                                                 errors regarding (1) the estimated
                                                    eligible for a separate rate and is                              International Trade Administration          weighted-average dumping margins for
                                                    considered part of the PRC-wide entity.7
                                                    Therefore, this amended final                                    [A–533–863, A–475–832, A–570–026, A–580– the PRC and (2) the date that the
                                                                                                                     878, A–583–856]                             extended period of provisional
                                                    determination does not change the later-
                                                                                                                                                                 measures expired.
                                                    established cash deposit rates for those
                                                    exporters. All other companies                                   Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel           Estimated Weighted-Average Dumping
                                                    identified in the table above do not have                        Products From India, Italy, the             Margins for PRC
                                                    a superseding cash deposit rate and,                             People’s Republic of China, the
                                                                                                                     Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Notice           As stated in the Initiation Notice,2 the
                                                    therefore, the Department will issue                                                                         Department       calculates combination
                                                    revised cash deposit instructions to U.S.                        of Correction to the Antidumping Duty
                                                                                                                     Orders                                      rates for respondents that are eligible for
                                                    Customs and Border Protection,                                                                               a separate rate in non-market economy
                                                    adjusting the cash deposit rate for these                        AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,         antidumping duty investigations. Policy
                                                    separate-rate companies to 43.35                                 International Trade Administration,         Bulletin 05.1 describes this practice.3
                                                    percent, effective July 24, 2016.                                Department of Commerce.                     While we correctly listed the PRC rates
                                                    Notification to Interested Parties                               FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Julia as combination rates in the PRC Final
                                                                                                                     Hancock or Susan Pulongbarit at (202)
                                                      This notice is issued and published in                                                                        1 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products
                                                                                                                     482–1394 and (202) 482–4031,
                                                    accordance with sections 516A(e)(1) and                                                                      from India, Italy, the People’s Republic of China,
                                                                                                                     respectively (Italy), Kabir Archuletta at   the Republic of Korea and Taiwan: Amended Final
                                                    777(i)(1) of the Act.
                                                                                                                     (202) 482–2593 (India); Elfi Blum or        Affirmative Antidumping Determination for India
                                                       6 Though Shenzhen Kehuaxing Industrial Ltd.
                                                                                                                     Lingjun Wang (Korea) at (202) 482–0197 and Taiwan, and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR
                                                                                                                                                                 48390 (July 25, 2016) (Antidumping Duty Orders).
                                                    was not granted a separate rate at the time of the               or (202) 482–2316, respectively; Nancy         2 See Certain Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products
                                                    Final Determination, it was later determined to be               Decker or Andrew Huston at (202) 482– From Italy, India, the People’s Republic of China,
                                                    eligible for a separate in the underlying                        0196 or (202) 482–4261, respectively
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                                                                 the Republic of Korea, and Taiwan: Initiation of
                                                    investigation in a prior amended final                           (PRC); or Shanah Lee or Paul Stolz at       Less-Than-Fair-Value Investigations, 80 FR 37228
                                                    determination and Timken notice. See Drawn                                                                   (June 30, 2015) (Initiation Notice).
                                                    Stainless Steel Sinks From the People’s Republic of              (202) 482–6386 and (202) 482–4474,             3 See Enforcement and Compliance’s Policy
                                                    China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony                   respectively (Taiwan), AD/CVD               Bulletin No. 05.1, regarding, ‘‘Separate-Rates
                                                    With Final Determination of Antidumping Duty                     Operations, Enforcement and                 Practice and Application of Combination Rates in
                                                    Investigation, 79 FR 63079 (October 22, 2014).                   Compliance, International Trade             Antidumping Investigations involving Non-Market
                                                       7 See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the
                                                                                                                     Administration, U.S. Department of          Economy Countries,’’ (April 5, 2005) (Policy
                                                    People’s Republic of China: Final Results of the                                                             Bulletin 05.1), available on the Department’s Web
                                                    Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012–                    Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/policy/bull05–
                                                    2014, 80 FR 69644 (November 10, 2015).                           Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.           1.pdf.



                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014      18:54 Aug 24, 2016     Jkt 238001     PO 00000     Frm 00008       Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703    E:\FR\FM\25AUN1.SGM          25AUN1



Document Created: 2016-08-25 00:34:30
Document Modified: 2016-08-25 00:34:30
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective July 24, 2016.
ContactEve Wang, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6231.
FR Citation81 FR 58474 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR