81 FR 58894 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; State Operating Permit Conditions for the Control of Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds from the Reynolds Consumer Products LLC-Bellwood Printing Plant
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 166 (August 26, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 166 (August 26, 2016)
| Page Range | 58894-58895 | |
| FR Document | 2016-20297 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 166 (Friday, August 26, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 58894-58895] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-20297] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R03-OAR-2016-0233; FRL-9951-40-Region 3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia; State Operating Permit Conditions for the Control of Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds from the Reynolds Consumer Products LLC--Bellwood Printing Plant AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes to approve the state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the Commonwealth of Virginia (Virginia) for the purpose of removing a consent agreement and order (consent order) previously included in the Virginia SIP to address reasonably available control technology (RACT) requirements for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) control at Reynolds Consumer Product LLC (Reynolds) plant and include a state operating permit for the Reynolds plant in the SIP to continue to address RACT requirements. In the Final Rules section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the Commonwealth's SIP submittal as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. A more detailed description of the state submittal and EPA's evaluation is included in a technical support document (TSD) prepared in support of this rulemaking action. A copy of the TSD is available, upon request, from the EPA Regional Office listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document or is also available electronically within the Docket for this rulemaking action. If no adverse comments are received in response to this action, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. DATES: Comments must be received in writing by September 26, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03- OAR-2016-0233 at http:// [[Page 58895]] www.regulations.gov, or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Becoat, (215) 814-2036, or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For further information, please see the information provided in the direct final action, with the same title, that is located in the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register publication. Dated: August 12, 2016. Shawn M. Garvin, Regional Administrator, Region III. [FR Doc. 2016-20297 Filed 8-25-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![58894 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 166 / Friday, August 26, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(b) Emergency disclosures. Upon permit the individual to take measures ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
disclosing a record pertaining to an to destroy evidence, intimidate potential AGENCY
individual made under compelling witnesses, or flee the area to avoid the
circumstances affecting health or safety, investigation. 40 CFR Part 52
the Privacy Act Office shall, within a (2) From 5 U.S.C. 552a(d), (e)(1), and [EPA–R03–OAR–2016–0233; FRL–9951–40–
reasonable time, notify that individual (f) concerning individual access to Region 3]
of the disclosure. This notice shall be records, when such access could
mailed to the individual’s last known compromise classified information Approval and Promulgation of Air
address and shall state the nature of the related to national security, interfere Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;
information disclosed; the person, with a pending investigation or internal State Operating Permit Conditions for
organization, or agency to which it was inquiry, constitute an unwarranted the Control of Emissions of Volatile
disclosed; the date of disclosure; and invasion of privacy, reveal a sensitive Organic Compounds from the
the compelling circumstances justifying investigative technique, or pose a Reynolds Consumer Products LLC—
disclosure. potential threat to the Commission or its Bellwood Printing Plant
employees or to law enforcement AGENCY: Environmental Protection
§ 515.10 Fees.
personnel. Additionally, access could Agency (EPA).
The Commission shall charge fees for reveal the identity of a source who
duplication of records under the Privacy ACTION: Proposed rule.
provided information under an express
Act in the same way in which it charges promise of confidentiality.
duplication fees under § 517.9. No SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
(3) From 5 U.S.C. 552a(d)(2), because Agency (EPA) proposes to approve the
search or review fee may be charged for to require the Commission to amend state implementation plan (SIP) revision
any record. Additionally, when the information thought to be incorrect, submitted by the Commonwealth of
Privacy Act Office makes a copy of a irrelevant, or untimely, because of the Virginia (Virginia) for the purpose of
record as a necessary part of reviewing nature of the information collected and removing a consent agreement and order
the record or granting access to the the length of time it is maintained, (consent order) previously included in
record, the Commission shall not charge would create an impossible the Virginia SIP to address reasonably
for the cost of making that copy. administrative and investigative burden available control technology (RACT)
Otherwise, the Commission may charge by continually forcing the Commission requirements for volatile organic
a fee sufficient to cover the cost of to resolve questions of accuracy, compounds (VOCs) control at Reynolds
duplicating a copy. relevance, timeliness, and Consumer Product LLC (Reynolds) plant
§ 515.11 Penalties. completeness. and include a state operating permit for
Any person who makes a false (4) From 5 U.S.C. 552a(e)(1) because: the Reynolds plant in the SIP to
statement in connection with any (i) It is not always possible to continue to address RACT requirements.
request for access to a record, or an determine relevance or necessity of In the Final Rules section of this
amendment thereto, under this part, is specific information in the early stages Federal Register, EPA is approving the
subject to the penalties prescribed in 18 of an investigation. Commonwealth’s SIP submittal as a
U.S.C. 494 and 495. (ii) Relevance and necessity are direct final rule without prior proposal
matters of judgment and timing in that because the Agency views this as a
§ 515.12 [Reserved] what appears relevant and necessary noncontroversial submittal and
when collected may be deemed anticipates no adverse comments. A
§ 515.13 Specific exemptions.
unnecessary later. Only after detailed rationale for the approval is set
(a) The following systems of records information is assessed can its relevance forth in the direct final rule. A more
are exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), and necessity be established. detailed description of the state
(e)(1) and (f): (iii) In any investigation the submittal and EPA’s evaluation is
(1) Indian Gaming Individuals included in a technical support
Commission may receive information
Records System. document (TSD) prepared in support of
(2) Management Contract Individuals concerning violations of law under the
jurisdiction of another agency. In the this rulemaking action. A copy of the
Record System.
(b) The exemptions under paragraph interest of effective law enforcement TSD is available, upon request, from the
(a) of this section apply only to the and under 25 U.S.C. 2716(b), the EPA Regional Office listed in the
information could be relevant to an ADDRESSES section of this document or
extent that information in these systems
is subject to exemption under 5 U.S.C. investigation by the Commission. is also available electronically within
552a(k)(2). When compliance would not (iv) In the interviewing of individuals the Docket for this rulemaking action. If
appear to interfere with or adversely or obtaining evidence in other ways no adverse comments are received in
affect the overall responsibilities of the during an investigation, the Commission response to this action, no further
Commission, with respect to licensing could obtain information that may or activity is contemplated. If EPA receives
of key employees and primary may not appear relevant at any given adverse comments, the direct final rule
management officials for employment in time; however, the information could be will be withdrawn and all public
an Indian gaming operation, the relevant to another investigation by the comments received will be addressed in
applicable exemption may be waived by Commission. a subsequent final rule based on this
the Commission. proposed rule. EPA will not institute a
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Jonodev O. Chaudhuri,
(c) Exemptions from the particular second comment period. Any parties
Chairman. interested in commenting on this action
sections are justified for the following Kathryn Isom-Clause,
reasons: should do so at this time.
(1) From 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), because Vice Chair. DATES: Comments must be received in
making available the accounting of E. Sequoyah Simermeyer, writing by September 26, 2016.
disclosures to an individual who is the Associate Commissioner. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
subject of a record could reveal [FR Doc. 2016–19749 Filed 8–25–16; 8:45 am] identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
investigative interest. This would BILLING CODE 7565–01–P OAR–2016–0233 at http://
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Aug 25, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM 26AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_59060/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 166 / Friday, August 26, 2016 / Proposed Rules 58895
www.regulations.gov, or via email to Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
fernandez.cristina@epa.gov. For Department of Commerce. Maggie Miller, Office of Protected
comments submitted at Regulations.gov, ACTION: 90-Day petition finding, request Resources, 301–427–8403.
follow the online instructions for for information. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed Background
SUMMARY: We, NMFS, announce a 90-
from Regulations.gov. For either manner day finding on a petition to list the On May 31, 2016, we received a
of submission, the EPA may publish any chambered nautilus (Nautilus petition from the Center for Biological
comment received to its public docket. pompilius) as a threatened species or an Diversity to list the chambered nautilus
Do not submit electronically any endangered species under the (N. pompilius) as a threatened species or
information you consider to be Endangered Species Act (ESA). We find an endangered species under the ESA.
confidential business information (CBI) that the petition, along with information Copies of the petition are available upon
or other information whose disclosure is readily available in our files, presents request (see ADDRESSES).
restricted by statute. Multimedia substantial scientific or commercial ESA Statutory, Regulatory, and Policy
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be information indicating that the Provisions and Evaluation Framework
accompanied by a written comment. petitioned action may be warranted. We
The written comment is considered the Section 4(b)(3)(A) of the ESA of 1973,
will conduct a status review of this
official comment and should include as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),
species to determine whether the
discussion of all points you wish to requires, to the maximum extent
petitioned action is in fact warranted.
make. The EPA will generally not practicable, that within 90 days of
To ensure that the status review is receipt of a petition to list a species as
consider comments or comment comprehensive, we are soliciting
contents located outside of the primary threatened or endangered, the Secretary
scientific and commercial information of Commerce make a finding on whether
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or pertaining to the chambered nautilus
other file sharing system). For that petition presents substantial
from any interested party. scientific or commercial information
additional submission methods, please
DATES: Information and comments on indicating that the petitioned action
contact the person identified in the FOR
the subject action must be received by may be warranted, and to promptly
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
October 25, 2016. publish such finding in the Federal
For the full EPA public comment policy,
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, Register (16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(3)(A)). When
information about CBI or multimedia
information, or data on this document, it is found that substantial scientific or
submissions, and general guidance on
identified by the code NOAA-NMFS- commercial information in a petition
making effective comments, please visit
2016-0098, by either of the following indicates the petitioned action may be
http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
methods: warranted (a ‘‘positive 90-day finding’’),
commenting-epa-dockets.
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all we are required to promptly commence
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: a review of the status of the species
Gregory Becoat, (215) 814–2036, or by electronic public comments via the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to concerned during which we will
email at becoat.gregory@epa.gov. conduct a comprehensive review of the
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For best available scientific and commercial
NOAA-NMFS-2016-0098. Click the
further information, please see the information. In such cases, we conclude
‘‘Comment Now’’ icon, complete the
information provided in the direct final the review with a finding as to whether,
required fields, and enter or attach your
action, with the same title, that is in fact, the petitioned action is
comments.
located in the ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ warranted within 12 months of receipt
section of this Federal Register • Mail: Submit written comments to of the petition. Because the finding at
publication. Maggie Miller, NMFS Office of the 12-month stage is based on a more
Protected Resources (F/PR3), 1315 East thorough review of the available
Dated: August 12, 2016. West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
Shawn M. Garvin,
information, as compared to the narrow
20910, USA. scope of review at the 90-day stage, a
Regional Administrator, Region III. Instructions: Comments sent by any ‘‘may be warranted’’ finding does not
[FR Doc. 2016–20297 Filed 8–25–16; 8:45 am] other method, to any other address or prejudge the outcome of the status
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P individual, or received after the end of review.
the comment period, may not be Under the ESA, a listing
considered by NMFS. All comments determination may address a species,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE received are a part of the public record which is defined to also include
and will generally be posted for public subspecies and, for any vertebrate
National Oceanic and Atmospheric viewing on www.regulations.gov species, any distinct population
Administration without change. All personal identifying segment (DPS) that interbreeds when
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), mature (16 U.S.C. 1532(16)). Because
50 CFR Parts 223 and 224 confidential business information, or the chambered nautilus is an
[Docket No. 160614518–6518–01] otherwise sensitive information invertebrate, the DPS option does not
submitted voluntarily by the sender will apply. Under the ESA, a species or
RIN 0648–XE685 be publicly accessible. NMFS will subspecies is ‘‘endangered’’ if it is in
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/ danger of extinction throughout all or a
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife;
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to significant portion of its range, or
90-Day Finding on a Petition To List
remain anonymous). ‘‘threatened’’ if it is likely to become
Chambered Nautilus as Threatened or
Endangered Under the Endangered Copies of the petition and related endangered within the foreseeable
Species Act materials are available on our Web site future throughout all or a significant
at http://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/pr/ portion of its range (ESA sections 3(6)
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries species/invertebrates/chambered- and 3(20), respectively, 16 U.S.C.
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and nautilus.html. 1532(6) and (20)). Pursuant to the ESA
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:00 Aug 25, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\26AUP1.SGM 26AUP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_59060/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2016-08-26 10:41:20
Document Modified: 2016-08-26 10:41:20
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received in writing by September 26, 2016. | |
| Contact | Gregory Becoat, (215) 814-2036, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 58894 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR