81_FR_6072 81 FR 6049 - Notice of Lodging of Proposed Partial Consent Decree Under the Clean Water Act

81 FR 6049 - Notice of Lodging of Proposed Partial Consent Decree Under the Clean Water Act

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 23 (February 4, 2016)

Page Range6049-6050
FR Document2016-02068

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 23 (Thursday, February 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6049-6050]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02068]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE


Notice of Lodging of Proposed Partial Consent Decree Under the 
Clean Water Act

    On January 28, 2016, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed 
Partial Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the 
Northern District of Mississippi in the lawsuit entitled United States 
and the State of Mississippi v. City of Greenville, Mississippi, Civil 
Action No. 4:16-cv-00018-DMB-JMV.
    The United States and the State of Mississippi filed this lawsuit 
under the Clean Water Act and the Mississippi Air and Water Pollution 
Control Law. The complaint seeks injunctive relief and civil penalties 
for violations in connection with the City's sanitary sewer system. The 
City has grouped mini-systems within the sewer system into three 
different groups and prioritized Sewer Group 1 and Sewer Group 2 for 
sewer assessment and rehabilitation work. The Partial Consent Decree 
provides for the City to conduct early action projects; capacity, 
management, operations, and maintenance program; and assessment and 
rehabilitation of Sewer Groups 1 and 2. The partial settlement will not 
resolve the claims for civil penalties or for injunctive relief related 
to Sewer Group 3, as those will be the topics of future negotiation 
among the parties.
    The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on 
the Partial Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the 
Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, 
and should refer to United States and the State of Mississippi v. City 
of Greenville, Mississippi, D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-1-1-10932. All comments 
must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication 
date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by 
mail:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         To submit comments:                     Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By email............................  [email protected].
By mail.............................  Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
                                       DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
                                       Washington, DC 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    During the public comment period, the Partial Consent Decree may be 
examined and downloaded at this Justice Department Web site: http://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. We will provide a paper copy of 
the Partial Consent Decree upon written

[[Page 6050]]

request and payment of reproduction costs. Please mail your request and 
payment to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, 
Washington, DC 20044-7611.
    Please enclose a check or money order for $60.50 (25 cents per page 
reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury. For a paper 
copy without the appendices, the cost is $14.

Henry S. Friedman,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment 
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-02068 Filed 2-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-15-P



                                                                                Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 23 / Thursday, February 4, 2016 / Notices                                                    6049

                                                       This rule derives from the text of two               citations omitted). ‘‘Rather,                           DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
                                                    provisions of the CSA. First, Congress                  Respondent’s challenge to the validity
                                                    defined ‘‘the term ‘practitioner’ [to]                  of the [New Mexico Board’s] Order must                  Notice of Lodging of Proposed Partial
                                                    mean[ ] a . . . physician . . . or other                be litigated in the forums provided by                  Consent Decree Under the Clean Water
                                                    person licensed, registered or otherwise                the State of [New Mexico], and his                      Act
                                                    permitted, by . . . the jurisdiction in                 contentions regarding the validity of the                 On January 28, 2016, the Department
                                                    which he practices . . . to distribute,                 [Board’s] order are not material to this                of Justice lodged a proposed Partial
                                                    dispense, [or] administer . . . a                       Agency’s resolution of whether he is                    Consent Decree with the United States
                                                    controlled substance in the course of                   entitled to maintain his DEA registration               District Court for the Northern District
                                                    professional practice.’’ 21 U.S.C.                      in’’ New Mexico. Id.                                    of Mississippi in the lawsuit entitled
                                                    802(21). Second, in setting the                            Because it is undisputed that
                                                                                                                                                                    United States and the State of
                                                    requirements for obtaining a                            Respondent’s New Mexico medical
                                                    practitioner’s registration, Congress                                                                           Mississippi v. City of Greenville,
                                                                                                            license remains suspended, I find that
                                                    directed that ‘‘[t]he Attorney General                                                                          Mississippi, Civil Action No. 4:16–cv–
                                                                                                            he no longer has authority under the
                                                    shall register practitioners . . . if the                                                                       00018–DMB–JMV.
                                                                                                            laws of New Mexico, the State in which
                                                                                                                                                                      The United States and the State of
                                                    applicant is authorized to dispense . . .               he is registered, to dispense controlled
                                                                                                                                                                    Mississippi filed this lawsuit under the
                                                    controlled substances under the laws of                 substances. Therefore, he is not entitled
                                                                                                                                                                    Clean Water Act and the Mississippi Air
                                                    the State in which he practices.’’ 21                   to maintain his DEA registration. See 21
                                                    U.S.C. 823(f). Because Congress has                                                                             and Water Pollution Control Law. The
                                                                                                            U.S.C. 802(21), 823(f), 824(a)(3).
                                                    clearly mandated that a practitioner                                                                            complaint seeks injunctive relief and
                                                                                                            Accordingly, I will order that his
                                                    possess state authority in order to be                                                                          civil penalties for violations in
                                                                                                            registration be revoked and that any
                                                    deemed a practitioner under the Act,                                                                            connection with the City’s sanitary
                                                                                                            pending application to renew or modify
                                                    DEA has held repeatedly that revocation                                                                         sewer system. The City has grouped
                                                                                                            his registration be denied.6
                                                    of a practitioner’s registration is the                                                                         mini-systems within the sewer system
                                                    appropriate sanction whenever he is no                  Order                                                   into three different groups and
                                                    longer authorized to dispense controlled                   Pursuant to the authority vested in me               prioritized Sewer Group 1 and Sewer
                                                    substances under the laws of the State                  by 21 U.S.C. 823(f) and 824(a), as well                 Group 2 for sewer assessment and
                                                    in which he practices medicine. See,                    as 28 CFR 0.100(b), I order that DEA                    rehabilitation work. The Partial Consent
                                                    e.g., Calvin Ramsey, 76 FR 20034, 20036                 Certificate of Registration AB5662552,                  Decree provides for the City to conduct
                                                    (2011); Sheran Arden Yeates, M.D., 71                   issued to Kenneth Harold Bull, M.D., be,                early action projects; capacity,
                                                    FR 39130, 39131 (2006); Dominick A.                     and it hereby is, revoked. I further order              management, operations, and
                                                    Ricci, 58 FR 51104, 51105 (1993); Bobby                 that any application of Kenneth Harold                  maintenance program; and assessment
                                                    Watts, 53 FR 11919, 11920 (1988).                       Bull, M.D., to renew or modify his                      and rehabilitation of Sewer Groups 1
                                                       Thus, the Agency has held that                       registration, be, and it hereby is, denied.             and 2. The partial settlement will not
                                                    revocation is warranted even where, as                  This Order is effective immediately.7                   resolve the claims for civil penalties or
                                                    here, the state board has suspended (as                                                                         for injunctive relief related to Sewer
                                                                                                              Dated: January 18, 2016.                              Group 3, as those will be the topics of
                                                    opposed to revoked) a practitioner’s
                                                                                                            Chuck Rosenberg,                                        future negotiation among the parties.
                                                    dispensing authority and that authority
                                                    may be restored at some point in the                    Acting Administrator.                                     The publication of this notice opens
                                                    future through further proceedings. See                 [FR Doc. 2016–02129 Filed 2–3–16; 8:45 am]              a period for public comment on the
                                                    Ramsey 76 FR at 20036 (citations                        BILLING CODE 4410–09–P                                  Partial Consent Decree. Comments
                                                    omitted). As the Agency has held, the                                                                           should be addressed to the Assistant
                                                    controlling question is not whether a                      6 While Respondent also asked that I delay the       Attorney General, Environment and
                                                    practitioner’s license to practice                      resolution of this matter, ‘‘in circumstances similar   Natural Resources Division, and should
                                                                                                            to those raised by Respondent, DEA has repeatedly       refer to United States and the State of
                                                    medicine in the state is suspended or                   denied requests to stay the issuance of a final order
                                                    revoked; rather, it is whether the                      of revocation, noting that [u]nder the Controlled       Mississippi v. City of Greenville,
                                                    Respondent is currently authorized to                   Substances Act, a practitioner must be currently        Mississippi, D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–1–1–
                                                    handle controlled substances in the                     authorized to handle controlled substances in the       10932. All comments must be submitted
                                                                                                            jurisdiction in which [he] practices in order to        no later than thirty (30) days after the
                                                    state. James L. Hooper, 76 FR 71371                     maintain [his] DEA registration.’’ Gregory F. Saric,
                                                    (2011) (collecting cases), pet. for rev.                76 FR 16821, 16822 (2011) (internal quotations and      publication date of this notice.
                                                    denied, Hooper v. Holder, 481 Fed.                      citations omitted). Of further note, Respondent’s       Comments may be submitted either by
                                                    Appx. 826 (4th Cir. 2012).                              state medical license was suspended more than 18        email or by mail:
                                                       Respondent further argues that I                     months ago, and yet his license still remains
                                                                                                            suspended.
                                                    should consider that the Medical                                                                                To submit
                                                                                                               Finally, while Respondent asserts that New                               Send them to:
                                                    Board’s case ‘‘rested entirely on                                                                               comments:
                                                                                                            Mexico is a medically underserved area, in the case
                                                    unsworn hearsay evidence in the form                    of individual practitioners, DEA has held that
                                                                                                                                                                    By email .......    pubcomment-ees.enrd@
                                                    of’’ the CPEP Report and that his expert                community impact evidence is irrelevant in the
                                                                                                            public interest determination as it is in a                                   usdoj.gov.
                                                    witness ‘‘disagreed with’’ the Board’s                  proceeding based on a loss of state authority. See      By mail .........   Assistant Attorney General,
                                                    conclusion that he should undergo a                     Linda Sue Cheek, 76 FR 66972, 66972 (2011);                                   U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
                                                    ‘‘residency-type program to continue                    Gregory Owens, 74 FR 36751, 36757 (2009). So too,                             Box 7611, Washington, DC
                                                    practicing. GX 8, at 2. This argument is                Respondent’s statement regarding his acceptance of
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                                                                                          20044–7611.
                                                                                                            responsibility is not a defense to a revocation based
                                                    simply a collateral attack on the State                 on the loss of state authority, because the CSA
                                                    Board proceeding. The Agency has held,                  mandate that a practitioner possess such authority        During the public comment period,
                                                    however, ‘‘that a registrant cannot                     to obtain and maintain a DEA registration.              the Partial Consent Decree may be
                                                    collaterally attack the result of a state                  7 Based on the findings of fact and conclusions of   examined and downloaded at this
                                                    criminal or administrative proceeding in                law which led the NMMB to immediately suspend           Justice Department Web site: http://
                                                                                                            Registrant’s license until he successfully completes
                                                    a proceeding under section 304, 21                      Board approved re-training,’’ GX 4, at 1; I conclude
                                                                                                                                                                    www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
                                                    U.S.C. 824, of the CSA.’’ Muzaffer                      that the public interest requires that this Order be    We will provide a paper copy of the
                                                    Aslan, 77 FR 37068, 37069 (2012) (other                 effective immediately. See 21 CFR 1316.67.              Partial Consent Decree upon written


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:21 Feb 03, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00069   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM    04FEN1


                                                    6050                        Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 23 / Thursday, February 4, 2016 / Notices

                                                    request and payment of reproduction                     —Evaluate whether the proposed                        others interested in criminal justices
                                                    costs. Please mail your request and                      collection of information is necessary               statistics.
                                                    payment to: Consent Decree Library,                      for the proper performance of the                       (5) An estimate of the total number of
                                                    U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,                            functions of the Bureau of Justice                   respondents and the amount of time
                                                    Washington, DC 20044–7611.                               Statistics, including whether the                    estimated for an average respondent to
                                                      Please enclose a check or money order                  information will have practical utility;             respond: An estimate of the total
                                                    for $60.50 (25 cents per page                           —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s                number of respondents is 111,960.
                                                    reproduction cost) payable to the United                 estimate of the burden of the                        About 98.5% (110,280) will have no
                                                    States Treasury. For a paper copy                        proposed collection of information,                  stalking victimization and will complete
                                                    without the appendices, the cost is $14.                 including the validity of the                        the short interview with an average
                                                                                                             methodology and assumptions used;                    burden of four (4) minutes. Among the
                                                    Henry S. Friedman,
                                                                                                            —Evalute whether and if so how the                    1.5% of respondents (1,679) who
                                                    Assistant Section Chief, Environmental                                                                        experience stalking victimization, the
                                                    Enforcement Section, Environment and
                                                                                                             quality, utility, and clarity of the
                                                    Natural Resources Division.                              information to be collected can be                   time to ask the detailed questions
                                                                                                             enchanced; and                                       regarding the aspects of their stalking
                                                    [FR Doc. 2016–02068 Filed 2–3–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                            —Minimize the burden of the collection                victimization is estimated to take an
                                                    BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
                                                                                                             of information on those who are to                   average of 8.25 minutes. Respondents
                                                                                                             respond, including through the use of                will be asked to respond to this survey
                                                                                                             appropriate automated, electronic,                   only once during the six month period.
                                                    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
                                                                                                             mechanical, or other technological                   The burden estimates are based on data
                                                    [OMB Number 1121–0302]                                   collection techniques or other forms                 from the prior administration of the
                                                                                                             of information technology, e.g.,                     SVS.
                                                    Agency Information Collection                            permitting electronic submission of                     (6) An estimate of the total public
                                                    Activities; Proposed eCollection                         responses.                                           burden (in hours) associated with the
                                                    eComments Requested;                                                                                          collection: There are an estimated 7,583
                                                    Reinstatement, With Change, of a                        Overview of This Information                          total burden hours associated with this
                                                    Previously Approved Collection for                      Collection                                            collection.
                                                    Which Approval has Expired: 2016                           (1) Type of Information Collection:                   If additional information is required
                                                    Supplemental Victimization Survey                       Reinstatement of the Supplemental                     contact: Jerri Murray, Department
                                                    (SVS)                                                   Victimization Survey (SVS), with                      Clearance Officer, United States
                                                                                                            change, to a previously approved                      Department of Justice, Justice
                                                    AGENCY:  Bureau of Justice Statistics,                  collection for which approval has                     Management Division, Policy and
                                                    Department of Justice.                                  expired.                                              Planning Staff, Two Constitution
                                                    ACTION: 60-day notice.                                     (2) The Title of the Form/Collection:              Square, 145 N Street NE., 3E.405B,
                                                                                                            2016 Supplemental Victimization                       Washington, DC 20530.
                                                    SUMMARY:   The Department of Justice
                                                                                                            Survey (SVS)                                            Dated: February 1, 2016.
                                                    (DOJ), Office of Justice Programs,
                                                    Bureau of Justice Statistics, will be                      (3) The agency form number, if any,                Jerri Murray,
                                                    submitting the following information                    and the applicable component of the                   Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
                                                    collection request to the Office of                     Department sponsoring the collection:                 Department of Justice.
                                                    Management and Budget (OMB) for                         The form number for the questionnaire                 [FR Doc. 2016–02125 Filed 2–3–16; 8:45 am]
                                                    review and approval in accordance with                  is SVS–1. The applicable component                    BILLING CODE 4410–18–P
                                                    the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.                    within the Department of Justice is the
                                                                                                            Bureau of Justice Statistics, in the Office
                                                    DATES: Comments are encouraged and                      of Justice Programs.
                                                    will be accepted for 60 days until April                                                                      DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
                                                                                                               (4) Affected public who will be asked
                                                    4, 2016.                                                or required to respond, as well as a brief            Occupational Safety and Health
                                                    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If                     abstract: Respondents will be persons                 Administration
                                                    you have additional comments                            16 years or older living in households
                                                    especially on the estimated public                      located throughout the United States                  [Docket No. OSHA–2016–0002]
                                                    burden or associated response time,                     sampled for the National Crime
                                                    suggestions, or need a copy of the                                                                            Federal Advisory Council on
                                                                                                            Victimization Survey (NCVS). The SVS                  Occupational Safety and Health
                                                    proposed information collection                         will be conducted as a supplement to
                                                    instrument with instructions or                                                                               (FACOSH)
                                                                                                            the NCVS in all sample households for
                                                    additional information, please contact                  a six (6) month period. The SVS is                    AGENCY:  Occupational Safety and Health
                                                    Jennifer Truman or Rachel Morgan,                       primarily an effort to measure the                    Administration (OSHA), Labor.
                                                    Statisticians, Bureau of Justice Statistics,            prevalence of stalking victimization                  ACTION: Announcement of FACOSH
                                                    810 Seventh Street NW., Washington,                     among persons, the types of stalking                  meeting.
                                                    DC 20531 (email: Jennifer.Truman@                       victimization experienced, the
                                                    usdoj.gov; telephone: 202–514–5083;                     characteristics of stalking victims, the              SUMMARY:   The Federal Advisory Council
                                                    email: Rachel.Morgan@usdoj.gov;                         nature and consequences of stalking                   on Occupational Safety and Health
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES




                                                    telephone: 202–616–1707).                               victimization, and patterns of reporting              (FACOSH) will meet Thursday,
                                                    SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written                      to the police. BJS plans to publish this              February 18, 2016, in Washington, DC.
                                                    comments and suggestions from the                       information in reports and reference it               DATES: FACOSH meeting: FACOSH will
                                                    public and affected agencies concerning                 when responding to queries from the                   meet from 1 to 4:30 p.m., Thursday,
                                                    the proposed collection of information                  U.S. Congress, Executive Office of the                February 18, 2016.
                                                    are encouraged. Your comments should                    President, the U.S. Supreme Court, state                Submission of comments, requests to
                                                    address one or more of the following                    officials, international organizations,               speak, speaker presentations, and
                                                    four points:                                            researchers, students, the media, and                 requests for special accommodations:


                                               VerDate Sep<11>2014   17:21 Feb 03, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00070   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\04FEN1.SGM   04FEN1



Document Created: 2016-02-04 00:31:17
Document Modified: 2016-02-04 00:31:17
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation81 FR 6049 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR