81 FR 60672 - Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 171 (September 2, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 171 (September 2, 2016)
| Page Range | 60672-60674 | |
| FR Document | 2016-21211 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 171 (Friday, September 2, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 60672-60674] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-21211] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-867] Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on large power transformers (LPTs) from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of review is August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015. The review covers five producers/exporters of the subject merchandise. We preliminarily determine that sales of subject merchandise by Hyosung Corporation (Hyosung) and Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (Hyundai), the two companies selected for individual examination, were made at less than normal value during the period of review. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective September 2, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Drury or Edythe Artman, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 0195 or (202) 482-3931, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Scope of the Order The scope of this order covers large liquid dielectric power transformers having a top power handling capacity greater than or equal to 60,000 kilovolt amperes (60 megavolt amperes), whether assembled or unassembled, complete or incomplete. The merchandise subject to the order is currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States at subheadings 8504.23.0040, 8504.23.0080 and 8504.90.9540. This tariff classification is provided for convenience and Customs purposes; however, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.\1\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The full text of the scope of the order is contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled ``Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Large Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea; 2014-2015'' (Preliminary Decision Memorandum), which is issued concurrent with and hereby adopted by this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Access to ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and is available to all [[Page 60673]] parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as an Appendix to this notice. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Tolling of Deadline As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department exercised its discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due to a closure of the Federal Government. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by four business days. The revised deadline for the preliminary results of this review is now August 26, 2016.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Memorandum to the File from Ron Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, regarding ``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During Snowstorm Jonas,'' dated January 27, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Constructed export price is calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Preliminary Results of Review We preliminarily determine that, for the period August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015, the following weighted-average dumping margins exist: \3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ As we did not have a publicly-ranged total U.S. sales value for Hyosung for the period August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015, to calculate a weighted-average dumping margin for the non-examined companies (i.e., Iljin, Iljin Electric Co., Ltd, and LSIS Co., Ltd.), the rate applied to these companies is a simple average of the weighted-average dumping margins calculated for Hyosung and Hyundai. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Producer or exporter dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hyosung Corporation..................................... 1.76 Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd....................... 3.09 Iljin Electric Co., Ltd................................. 2.43 Iljin................................................... 2.43 LSIS Co., Ltd........................................... 2.43 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure and Public Comment The Department will disclose to parties to the proceeding any calculations performed in connection with these preliminary results of review within five days after the date of publication of this notice.\4\ The Department will announce the briefing schedule to interested parties at a later date. Interested parties may submit case briefs on the deadline that the Department will announce.\5\ Rebuttal briefs, the content of which is limited to the issues raised in the case briefs, must be filed within five days from the deadline date for the submission of case briefs.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b) \5\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii) and (d)(1). \6\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1) and (2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are requested to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities.\7\ Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed using ACCESS.\8\ Case and rebuttal briefs must be served on interested parties.\9\ Executive summaries should be limited to five pages total, including footnotes. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). \8\ See generally 19 CFR 351.303. \9\ See 19 CFR 351.303(f). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a date and time to be determined.\10\ Parties should confirm the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department intends to publish the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of issues raised in any case or rebuttal brief, no later than 120 days after publication of these preliminary results, unless extended.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act; 19 CFR 351.213(h). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Upon completion of this administrative review, the Department shall determine, and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If a respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis in the final results of this review and the respondent reported reliable entered values, we will calculate importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates for the merchandise based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales made during the period of review to each importer to the total entered value of those same sales in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). If the respondent has not reported reliable entered values, we will calculate a per-unit assessment rate for each importer by dividing the total amount of dumping for the examined sales made during the period of review to that importer by the total sales quantity associated with those transactions. Where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If the respondent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP not to assess duties on any of its entries in accordance with the Final Modification for Reviews, i.e., ``{w{time} here the weighted-average margin of dumping for the exporter is determined to be zero or de minimis, no antidumping duties will be assessed.'' \12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Regarding entries of subject merchandise during the period of review that were produced by Hyosung and Hyundai and for which they did not know that the merchandise was destined for the United States, we will instruct CBP to liquidate un-reviewed entries at the all-others rate of 22.00 percent, as established in the less-than-fair-value investigation of the order, if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the [[Page 60674]] transaction.\13\ For a full discussion of this matter, see Assessment Policy Notice.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012). \14\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for Hyosung and Hyundai and other companies listed above will be equal to the weighted- average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding in which they were reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or in the investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be the all-others rate of 22.00 percent, the rate established in the investigation of this proceeding.\15\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ See Large Power Transformers From the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 53177 (August 31, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: August 26, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Background 2. Companies Not Selected for Individual Examination 3. Deadline for Submission of Updated Sales and Cost Information 4. Scope of the Order 5. Comparisons to Normal Value A. Determination of Comparison Method B. Results of the Differential Pricing Analysis 6. Product Comparisons 7. Date of Sale 8. Constructed Export Price 9. Normal Value A. Home Market Viability as Comparison Market B. Level of Trade C. Sales to Affiliates D. Cost of Production 1. Calculation of Cost of Production 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices 3. Results of the Cost of Production Test E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on Comparison Market Prices F. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparison 10. Currency Conversion 11. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-21211 Filed 9-1-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![60672 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 171 / Friday, September 2, 2016 / Notices
7306.30.50.90, 7306.50.50.50, and merchandise; (4) if neither the exporter SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
7306.50.50.70. nor the manufacturer has its own rate, (the Department) is conducting an
While the HTSUS subheadings are the cash deposit rate will be 2.34 administrative review of the
provided for convenience and customs percent.3 These cash deposit antidumping duty order on large power
purposes, the written description is requirements, when imposed, shall transformers (LPTs) from the Republic
dispositive. remain in effect until further notice. of Korea (Korea). The period of review
Final Results of Review is August 1, 2014, through July 31, 2015.
Notification to Importers
The review covers five producers/
The Department made no changes to This notice serves as a final reminder exporters of the subject merchandise.
the Preliminary Results. As a result of to importers of their responsibility We preliminarily determine that sales of
this review, we determine that a under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a subject merchandise by Hyosung
weighted-average dumping margin of certificate regarding the reimbursement Corporation (Hyosung) and Hyundai
0.00 percent exists for Tension Steel of antidumping duties prior to Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (Hyundai),
Industries Co., Ltd. for the period July liquidation of the relevant entries the two companies selected for
18, 2014, through August 31, 2015. during this review period. Failure to individual examination, were made at
Assessment comply with this requirement could less than normal value during the
result in the Secretary’s presumption period of review. Interested parties are
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)
that reimbursement of antidumping invited to comment on these
and the Final Modification,2 the
duties occurred and the subsequent preliminary results.
Department will instruct U.S. Customs
assessment of double antidumping DATES: Effective September 2, 2016.
and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate
duties.
all appropriate entries for Tension Steel FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
without regard to antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Orders Drury or Edythe Artman, AD/CVD
For entries of subject merchandise Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and
This notice also serves as a reminder
during the POR produced by Tension Compliance, International Trade
to parties subject to administrative
Steel for which it did not know that the Administration, U.S. Department of
protective order (APO) of their
merchandise was destined for the Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
responsibility concerning the
United States, we will instruct CBP to Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230;
destruction of proprietary information
liquidate un-reviewed entries at the all- telephone: (202) 482–0195 or (202) 482–
disclosed under APO in accordance
others rate if there is no rate for the 3931, respectively.
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
intermediate company(ies) involved in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
written notification of the return or
the transaction. We intend to issue
destruction of APO materials or Scope of the Order
instructions to CBP 15 days after
conversion to judicial protective order is
publication of the final results of this The scope of this order covers large
hereby requested. Failure to comply
review. liquid dielectric power transformers
with the regulations and terms of an
Cash Deposit Requirements APO is a sanctionable violation. having a top power handling capacity
We are issuing and publishing these greater than or equal to 60,000 kilovolt
The following deposit requirements
results in accordance with sections amperes (60 megavolt amperes),
will be effective upon publication of the
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. whether assembled or unassembled,
final results of administrative review for
complete or incomplete. The
all shipments of subject merchandise Dated: August 26, 2016. merchandise subject to the order is
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, Paul Piquado, currently classified in the Harmonized
for consumption on or after the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Tariff Schedule of the United States at
publication date as provided by section Compliance. subheadings 8504.23.0040,
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash [FR Doc. 2016–21212 Filed 9–1–16; 8:45 am] 8504.23.0080 and 8504.90.9540. This
deposit rate for Tension Steel will be BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P tariff classification is provided for
0.00 percent, the weighted-average
convenience and Customs purposes;
dumping margin established in the final
however, the written description of the
results of this administrative review; (2) DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE scope of the order is dispositive.1
for merchandise exported by
The Preliminary Decision
manufacturers or exporters not covered International Trade Administration
Memorandum is a public document and
in this review but covered in a prior
is on file electronically via Enforcement
segment of the proceeding, the cash [A–580–867] and Compliance’s Antidumping and
deposit rate will continue to be the
Large Power Transformers From the Countervailing Duty Centralized
company-specific rate published for the
Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
most recently completed segment of this
of Antidumping Duty Administrative Access to ACCESS is available to
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a
Review; 2014–2015 registered users at http://
firm covered in this review, a prior
access.trade.gov and is available to all
review, or the less-than-fair-value
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
investigation but the manufacturer is,
International Trade Administration, 1 The full text of the scope of the order is
the cash deposit rate will be the rate contained in the memorandum to Paul Piquado,
Department of Commerce.
established for the most recently Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
completed segment of this proceeding Compliance, from Gary Taverman, Associate
3 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
for the manufacturer of the India, the Republic of Korea, Taiwan, the Republic Countervailing Duty Operations, entitled ‘‘Decision
of Turkey, and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Memorandum for Preliminary Results of
2 See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of Antidumping Duty Orders; and Certain Oil Country Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Large
the Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and Tubular Goods From the Socialist Republic of Power Transformers from the Republic of Korea;
Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Vietnam: Amended Final Determination of Sales at 2014–2015’’ (Preliminary Decision Memorandum),
Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8103 Less Than Fair Value, 79 FR 53691, 53693 which is issued concurrent with and hereby
(February 14, 2012) (Final Modification). (September 10, 2014). adopted by this notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:25 Sep 01, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM 02SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_60843/page/1.svg)
![60674 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 171 / Friday, September 2, 2016 / Notices
transaction.13 For a full discussion of Notification to Interested Parties Council address: North Pacific
this matter, see Assessment Policy We are issuing and publishing this Fishery Management Council, 605 W.
Notice.14 notice in accordance with sections 4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK
We intend to issue liquidation 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 99501–2252; telephone: (907) 271–2809.
instructions to CBP 15 days after FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dated: August 26, 2016.
publication of the final results of this Diana Stram, Council staff; telephone:
Paul Piquado, (907) 271–2809.
review.
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Cash Deposit Requirements SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Compliance.
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in Agenda
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon the Preliminary Decision Memorandum Tuesday, September 20, 2016 Through
publication of the final results of this 1. Background Friday, September 23, 2016
administrative review for all shipments 2. Companies Not Selected for Individual The CPT will review updated stock
of the subject merchandise entered, or Examination assessments to determine overfishing
withdrawn from warehouse, for 3. Deadline for Submission of Updated Sales
status and catch specifications for
consumption on or after the publication and Cost Information
PIBKC (Pribilof Islands Blue King Crab),
date of the final results of this 4. Scope of the Order
5. Comparisons to Normal Value BBRKC (Bristol Bay Red King Crab),
administrative review, as provided by PIRKC (Pribilof Island Red King Crab),
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The A. Determination of Comparison Method
B. Results of the Differential Pricing SMBKC (St. Matthew Blue King Crab),
cash deposit rate for Hyosung and Analysis Bering Sea Snow Crab, and Bering Sea
Hyundai and other companies listed 6. Product Comparisons Tanner Crab. The Agenda is subject to
above will be equal to the weighted- 7. Date of Sale change, and the latest version will be
average dumping margin established in 8. Constructed Export Price posted at http://www.npfmc.org/.
the final results of this administrative 9. Normal Value
review; (2) for previously reviewed or A. Home Market Viability as Comparison Special Accommodations
investigated companies not listed above, Market
B. Level of Trade These meetings are physically
the cash deposit rate will continue to be accessible to people with disabilities.
the company-specific rate published for C. Sales to Affiliates
D. Cost of Production Requests for sign language
the most recently completed segment of 1. Calculation of Cost of Production interpretation or other auxiliary aids
this proceeding in which they were 2. Test of Comparison Market Sales Prices should be directed to Shannon Gleason
reviewed; (3) if the exporter is not a firm 3. Results of the Cost of Production Test at (907) 271–2809 at least 7 working
covered in this review, a prior review, E. Calculation of Normal Value Based on days prior to the meeting date.
or in the investigation but the producer Comparison Market Prices
is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate F. Price-to-Constructed Value Comparison Dated: August 30, 2016.
established for the most recently 10. Currency Conversion Tracey L. Thompson,
completed segment of this proceeding 11. Recommendation Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable
for the producer of the merchandise; [FR Doc. 2016–21211 Filed 9–1–16; 8:45 am] Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P [FR Doc. 2016–21188 Filed 9–1–16; 8:45 am]
producers or exporters will continue to BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
be the all-others rate of 22.00 percent,
the rate established in the investigation DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
of this proceeding.15 These cash deposit DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
requirements, when imposed, shall National Oceanic and Atmospheric
remain in effect until further notice. Administration National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XE855
Notification to Importers
RIN 0648–XE856
This notice also serves as a reminder North Pacific Fishery Management
to importers of their responsibility Council; Public Meeting North Pacific Fishery Management
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a Council; Public Meeting
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
certificate regarding the reimbursement Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
of antidumping duties prior to Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
liquidation of the relevant entries Commerce. Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
during this review period. Failure to Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
comply with this requirement could
ACTION: Notice of public meeting.
result in the Department’s presumption SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery
that reimbursement of antidumping Management Council (Council) Crab SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery
duties occurred and the subsequent Plan Team (CPT) will meet September Management Council (Council)
assessment of double antidumping 20 through September 23, 2016. Observer Advisory Committee (OAC)
duties. will meet in Seattle, WA.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Tuesday, September 20, 2016 through DATES: The meeting will be held on
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
13 See Large Power Transformers From the
Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR
Friday, September 23, 2016, from 9 a.m. Monday, September 19, 2016, from 9
53177 (August 31, 2012). to 5 p.m. a.m. to 5 p.m. and on Tuesday,
14 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at September 20, 2016, from 8:30 a.m. to
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 the Alaska Fishery Science Center 1 p.m.
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003) (Assessment Policy Notice).
15 See Large Power Transformers From the Traynor Room 2076, 7600 Sand Point ADDRESSES: The meeting will be in the
Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR Way NE., Building 4, Seattle, WA Observer Training Room, Building 4 at
53177 (August 31, 2012). 98115. the Alaska Fisheries Science Center,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:25 Sep 01, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\02SEN1.SGM 02SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_60843/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-09 11:55:35
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 11:55:35
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective September 2, 2016. | |
| Contact | John Drury or Edythe Artman, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 0195 or (202) 482-3931, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 60672 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR