81 FR 61133 - Safety Zone; Swim Around Charleston; Charleston, SC
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 172 (September 6, 2016)
Coast Guard
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 172 (September 6, 2016)
| Page Range | 61133-61136 | |
| FR Document | 2016-21272 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 6, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 61133-61136] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-21272] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket Number USCG-2016-0241] RIN 1625-AA00 Safety Zone; Swim Around Charleston; Charleston, SC AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Temporary final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 61134]] SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary moving safety zone during the Swim Around Charleston, a swimming race occurring on the Wando River, the Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, and the Ashley River, in Charleston, South Carolina on September 25, 2016. The temporary safety zone is necessary for the safety of the swimmers, participant vessels, spectators, and the general public during the event. The temporary safety zone will restrict vessel traffic in portions of the Charleston Harbor and surrounding rivers. Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative. DATES: This rule is effective on September 25, 2016 from 8:45 a.m. until 3:45 p.m. ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov type USCG- 2016-0241 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, call or email Lieutenant John Downing, Sector Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843) 740-3184, email [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Sec. Section U.S.C. United States Code II. Background Information and Regulatory History On March 17, 2016, Kathleen Wilson notified the Coast Guard that she will be sponsoring the Swim Around Charleston from 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. on September 25, 2016. In response, on June 6, 2016, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled Safety Zone, Swim Around Charleston; Charleston, SC. There we stated why we issued the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action related to this special local regulation. During the comment period that ended July 7, 2016, we received no comments. We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of this rule would be impracticable due to the date of the event. The Coast Guard did not receive any adverse comments during the period outlined in the NPRM with regard to this rule. III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule The legal basis for this rule is the Coast Guard's Authority to establish regulated navigation areas and other limited access areas: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. The purpose of the rule is to ensure the safety of the swimmers, participant vessels, spectators, and the general public life during the Swim Around Charleston. IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM published June 6, 2016. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this rule from the proposed rule in the NPRM. This rule establishes a safety zone from 8:45 a.m. to 3:45 p.m. on September 25, 2016. The safety zone will cover a portion of the waters of the Wando River, Cooper River, Charleston Harbor, and Ashley River, in Charleston, South Carolina. Approximately 120 swimmers are anticipated to participate in the race. Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the Port Charleston by telephone at (843) 740-7050, or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization. If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area is granted, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative. The Coast Guard will provide notice of the safety zone by Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated representatives. V. Regulatory Analyses We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protesters. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. The economic impact of this rule is not significant for the following reasons: (1) The temporary safety zone will be enforced for a total of seven hours; (2) the safety zone will move with the participant vessels so that once the swimmers clear a portion of the waterway, the safety zone will no longer be enforced in that portion of the waterway; (3) although persons and vessels may not enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the safety zone without authorization from the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative; they may operate in the surrounding area during the enforcement period; (4) persons and vessels may still enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the safety zone if authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative; and (5) the Coast Guard will provide advance notification of the safety zone to the local maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons discussed in the Regulatory Planning and Review section above, this rule will not have a [[Page 61135]] significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section, above. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a temporary safety zone. This rule is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist and a Categorical Exclusion Determination was completed for 2016. The environmental analysis checklist and Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket folder where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 0 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 160.5; and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 0 2 . Add Sec. 165.T07-0241 to read as follows: Sec. 165.T07-0241 Safety Zone; Swim Around Charleston, Charleston, SC. (a) Regulated area. The following regulated area is a moving safety zone: All waters within a 50-yard radius in front of the lead safety vessel preceding the first race participants, 50 yards behind the safety vessel trailing the last race participants, and at all times extend 100 yards on either side of safety vessels. The Swim Around Charleston swimming race consists of a 12 mile course that starts at Remley Point on the Wando River in approximate position 32[deg]48'49'' N., 79[deg]54'27'' W., crosses the main shipping channel of Charleston Harbor, and finishes at the General William B. Westmoreland Bridge on the Ashley River in approximate position 32[deg]50'14'' N., 80[deg]01'23'' W. All coordinates are North American Datum 1983. (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Charleston in the enforcement of the regulated areas. (c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative. (2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the Port Charleston by telephone at (843) 740-7050, or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization. If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area is granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative. (3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by Marine Safety Information Bulletins, Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated representatives. (d) Effective date. This rule will is effective on September 25, 2016 and [[Page 61136]] will be enforced from 8:45 a.m. until 3:45 p.m. B.D. Falk, Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port Charleston. [FR Doc. 2016-21272 Filed 9-2-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 61133
hearing,’’ which are conducted pursuant estimated to have already established List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and and implemented the systems and Administrative practice and
557. The CSA sets forth the criteria for processes required to handle PB-22, 5F- procedure, Drug traffic control,
scheduling a drug or other substance. PB-22, AB-FUBINACA, and ADB- Reporting and recordkeeping
Such actions are exempt from review by PINACA. Therefore, the DEA anticipates requirements.
the Office of Management and Budget that this rule will impose minimal or no
(OMB) pursuant to section 3(d)(1) of economic impact on businesses that For the reasons set out above, 21 CFR
Executive Order 12866 and the currently handle PB-22, 5F-PB-22, AB- part 1308 is amended as follows:
principles reaffirmed in Executive Order FUBINACA, or ADB-PINACA for lawful PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF
13563. purposes. This estimate applies to CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
entities large and small. Accordingly,
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
the DEA has concluded that this rule ■ 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
Reform
will not have a significant effect on a part 1308 continues to read as follows:
This regulation meets the applicable substantial number of small entities.
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b),
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 unless otherwise noted.
eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, ■ 2. Amend § 1308.11 as follows:
On the basis of information contained
minimize litigation, provide a clear legal ■ a. Add paragraphs (d)(51) through
in the ‘‘Regulatory Flexibility Act’’
standard for affected conduct, and (54);
section above, the DEA has determined
promote simplification and burden ■ b. Remove paragraphs (h)(4) through
and certifies pursuant to the Unfunded
reduction. (7);
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) of 1995,
■ c. Redesignate paragraphs (h)(8)
Executive Order 13132, Federalism 2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq., that this action
through (22) as paragraphs (h)(4)
will not result in any Federal mandate
This rulemaking does not have through (18); and
that may result in the expenditure by
federalism implications warranting the ■ d. Redesignate paragraphs (h)(26) and
State, local, and tribal governments, in
application of Executive Order 13132. (27) as paragraphs (h)(19) and (20).
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
The rule does not have substantial The additions read as follows:
$100,000,000 or more (adjusted for
direct effects on the States, on the
inflation) in any one year. Therefore, § 1308.11 Schedule I.
relationship between the national
neither a Small Government Agency * * * * *
government and the States, or the
Plan nor any other action is required (d) * * *
distribution of power and
under provisions of the UMRA of 1995.
responsibilities among the various (51) quinolin-8-yl 1-pentyl-1H-
levels of government. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 indole-3-carboxylate (PB-22;
QUPIC) ...................................... (7222)
Executive Order 13175, Consultation This action does not impose a new (52) quinolin-8-yl 1-(5-
and Coordination With Indian Tribal collection of information under the fluoropentyl)-1H-indole-3-
Governments Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 44 carboxylate (5-fluoro-PB-22;
U.S.C. 3501–3521. This action would 5F-PB-22) .................................. (7225)
This rule does not have tribal (53) N-(1-amino-3-methyl-1-
implications warranting the application not impose recordkeeping or reporting
requirements on State or local oxobutan-2-yl)-1-(4-
of Executive Order 13175. It does not fluorobenzyl)-1H-indazole-3-
have substantial direct effects on one or governments, individuals, businesses, or carboxamide (AB-FUBINACA) (7012)
more Indian tribes, on the relationship organizations. An agency may not (54) N-(1-amino-3,3-dimethyl-1-
between the Federal Government and conduct or sponsor, and a person is not oxobutan-2-yl)-1-pentyl-1H-in-
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of required to respond to, a collection of dazole-3-carboxamide (ADB-
power and responsibilities between the information unless it displays a PINACA) ................................... (7035)
Federal Government and Indian tribes. currently valid OMB control number. * * * * *
Regulatory Flexibility Act Congressional Review Act Dated: August 30, 2016.
The Administrator, in accordance This rule is not a major rule as Chuck Rosenberg,
with the Regulatory Flexibility Act defined by section 804 of the Small Acting Administrator.
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–602, has reviewed Business Regulatory Enforcement [FR Doc. 2016–21345 Filed 9–2–16; 8:45 am]
this final rule and by approving it Fairness Act of 1996 (Congressional BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
certifies that it will not have a Review Act (CRA)). This rule will not
significant economic impact on a result in: ‘‘an annual effect on the
substantial number of small entities. On economy of $100,000,000 or more; a DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
February 10, 2014, the DEA published a major increase in costs or prices for SECURITY
final order amending 21 CFR 1308.11(h) consumers, individual industries,
to temporarily place these four synthetic Federal, State, or local government Coast Guard
cannabinoids into schedule I of the CSA agencies, or geographic regions; or
pursuant to the temporary scheduling significant adverse effects on 33 CFR Part 165
provisions of 21 U.S.C. 811(h). 79 FR competition, employment, investment, [Docket Number USCG–2016–0241]
7577. On February 5, 2016, the DEA productivity, innovation, or on the
published a final order extending the ability of U.S.-based companies to RIN 1625–AA00
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
temporary placement of these compete with foreign based companies
substances in schedule I of the CSA for in domestic and export markets.’’ Safety Zone; Swim Around Charleston;
up to one year pursuant to 21 U.S.C. However, pursuant to the CRA, the DEA Charleston, SC
811(h)(2). 81 FR 6175. Accordingly, all has submitted a copy of this final rule AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
entities that currently handle or plan to to both Houses of Congress and to the
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
handle these synthetic cannabinoids are Comptroller General.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:06 Sep 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM 06SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_61305/page/1.svg)
![61136 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
will be enforced from 8:45 a.m. until materials are available either recommendation and intends to
3:45 p.m. electronically in http:// promulgate a designation different from
www.regulations.gov. a state’s recommendation, the EPA must
B.D. Falk,
In addition, the EPA has established notify the state at least 120 days prior
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting a Web site for the rulemakings to to promulgating the final designation
Captain of the Port Charleston.
initially designate areas for the 2012 and the EPA must provide the state an
[FR Doc. 2016–21272 Filed 9–2–16; 8:45 am]
primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS at: opportunity to demonstrate why any
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P https://www3.epa.gov/pmdesignations/ proposed modification is inappropriate.
2012standards/index.htm. This Web These modifications may relate either to
site includes the EPA’s final area an area’s designation or boundaries.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION designations for the PM2.5 NAAQS, as On December 18, 2014, the
AGENCY well as state and tribal initial Administrator of the EPA signed a final
recommendation letters, the EPA’s action promulgating initial designations
40 CFR Part 81 modification letters, technical support for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS for the
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–0918; FRL–9951–91– documents, responses to comments and majority of the U.S., including areas of
OAR] other related technical information. Indian country (80 FR 2206 FR; January
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 15, 2015). That action designated 14
Air Quality Designations for the 2012 general questions concerning this areas in six states, including two multi-
Primary Annual Fine Particle (PM2.5) action, please contact Carla Oldham, state areas, as nonattainment for the
National Ambient Air Quality Standard U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. The EPA also
(NAAQS) for Areas in Georgia and and Standards, Air Quality Planning designated three areas, including the
Florida Division, C539–04, Research Triangle entire state of Illinois, as
Park, North Carolina 27711, telephone ‘‘unclassifiable’’ because the ambient air
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
(919) 541–3347, email at oldham.carla@ quality monitoring sites in these areas
Agency.
epa.gov. The Region 4 contact is lacked complete data for the relevant
ACTION: Final rule. period from 2011–2013. In the absence
Madolyn Sanchez, U.S. EPA, Air
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Regulatory Management Section, Air of complete monitoring data, the EPA
Agency (EPA) is establishing air quality Planning and Implementation Branch, could not determine, based on available
designations in the United States (U.S.) Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management information, whether these areas meet
for the 2012 primary annual fine Division, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, or do not meet the NAAQS, and also
particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Georgia 30303–8960, telephone (404) could not determine whether these areas
Quality Standard (NAAQS) for three contribute to a nearby violation.
562–9644, email at sanchez.madolyn@
areas in Georgia and 62 counties in Consistent with the EPA’s ‘‘Policy for
epa.gov.
Florida. When the EPA designated the Establishing Separate Air Quality
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Designations for Areas of Indian
majority of areas in the country in
December 2014, and March 2015, the I. Background Country’’ (December 20, 2011), the EPA
EPA deferred initial area designations designated the lands of the Pechanga
On December 14, 2012, the EPA Band of Luiseño Mission Indians in
for several locations, including these promulgated a revised primary annual
areas, because the EPA could not Southern California as an unclassifiable/
PM2.5 NAAQS to provide increased attainment area separate from its
determine using available data whether protection of public health from fine
the areas were meeting or not meeting adjacent/surrounding state areas. Except
particle pollution (78 FR 3086; January for the 10 areas discussed in the next
the NAAQS, but we believed that 15, 2013). In that action, the EPA
forthcoming data in 2015 would allow paragraph, the EPA designated all the
strengthened the primary annual PM2.5 remaining state areas and areas of
the EPA to make that determination. standard from 15.0 micrograms per Indian country as unclassifiable/
Georgia and Florida have recently cubic meter (mg/m3) to 12.0 mg/m3, attainment.
submitted complete, quality-assured, which is attained when the 3-year The EPA deferred initial area
and certified air quality monitoring data average of the annual arithmetic means designations for 10 areas where
for 2015 for the areas identified in this does not exceed 12.0 mg/m3. available data, including air quality
notice, and based on these data, the EPA Section 107(d) of the Clean Air Act monitoring data, were insufficient to
is designating these areas as (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7407(d), governs the determine whether the areas met or did
unclassifiable/attainment for the 2012 process for initial area designations after not meet the NAAQS, but where
primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS. the EPA establishes a new or revised forthcoming data were likely to result in
DATES: This final rule is effective on NAAQS. Under CAA section 107(d), complete and valid air quality data
October 6, 2016. each governor is required to, and each sufficient to determine whether these
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a tribal leader may, if they so choose, areas meet the NAAQS. Accordingly,
docket for this action under Docket ID recommend air quality designations, the EPA stated that it would use the
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–0918. All including the appropriate boundaries additional time available as provided
documents in the docket are listed in for ‘‘nonattainment’’ areas, to the EPA under section 107(d)(1)(B) of the CAA to
the http://www.regulations.gov Web by a date which cannot be later than 1 assess relevant information and
site. Although listed in the index, some year after the promulgation of a new or subsequently promulgate initial
information is not publicly available, revised NAAQS. The EPA considers designations for the identified areas
i.e., Confidential Business Information these recommendations as part of its through a separate rulemaking action or
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
or other information whose disclosure is duty to promulgate the area actions. The 10 deferred areas included:
restricted by statute. Certain other designations and boundaries for the new Eight areas in the state of Georgia,
material, such as copyrighted material, or revised NAAQS. If, after careful including two neighboring counties in
is not placed on the Internet and will be consideration of these the bordering states of Alabama and
publicly available only in hard copy recommendations, the EPA believes that South Carolina; the entire state of
form. Publicly available docket it is necessary to modify a state’s Tennessee, excluding three counties in
VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:06 Sep 02, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\06SER1.SGM 06SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_61305/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-09 12:03:59
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 12:03:59
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Temporary final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on September 25, 2016 from 8:45 a.m. until 3:45 p.m. | |
| Contact | If you have questions on this rule, call or email Lieutenant John Downing, Sector Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843) 740-3184, email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 61133 | |
| RIN Number | 1625-AA00 | |
| CFR Associated | Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR