81_FR_61460 81 FR 61288 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule 12400 of the Code of Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes and Rule 13400 of the Code of Arbitration Procedure for Industry Disputes Relating to Broadening Chairperson Eligibility in Arbitration

81 FR 61288 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule 12400 of the Code of Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes and Rule 13400 of the Code of Arbitration Procedure for Industry Disputes Relating to Broadening Chairperson Eligibility in Arbitration

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 172 (September 6, 2016)

Page Range61288-61290
FR Document2016-21253

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 172 (Tuesday, September 6, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 6, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61288-61290]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21253]



[[Page 61288]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-78729; File No. SR-FINRA-2016-033]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory 
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Amending 
Rule 12400 of the Code of Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes 
and Rule 13400 of the Code of Arbitration Procedure for Industry 
Disputes Relating to Broadening Chairperson Eligibility in Arbitration

August 30, 2016.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that 
on August 18, 2016, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. 
(``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by FINRA. The Commission 
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule 
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA Rule 12400 of the Code of 
Arbitration Procedure for Customer Disputes (``Customer Code'') and 
FINRA Rule 13400 of the Code of Arbitration Procedure for Industry 
Disputes (``Industry Code,'' and together with the Customer Code, the 
``Codes'') to provide that an attorney arbitrator would be eligible for 
the chairperson roster if he or she completes chairperson training and 
serves as an arbitrator through award on at least one arbitration, 
instead of two arbitrations, administered by a self-regulatory 
organization (``SRO'') in which hearings were held.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on FINRA's Web 
site at http://www.finra.org, at the principal office of FINRA and at 
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, FINRA included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. FINRA has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, 
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
Background
    FINRA rules require chairpersons, who play a vital role in the 
administration of arbitration cases, to have arbitrator experience and 
training to ensure the quality and efficiency of arbitrations. FINRA 
Rules 12400 and 13400 address the Neutral List Selection System 
(``NLSS'') \3\ and arbitrator rosters and provide, among other matters, 
that an arbitrator is eligible for the chairperson roster if he or she 
has completed chairperson training provided by FINRA and:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The NLSS is a computer system that generates, on a random 
basis, lists of arbitrators from FINRA's rosters of arbitrators for 
the selected hearing location for each proceeding. FINRA maintains a 
roster of non-public arbitrators (as defined in FINRA Rules 12100(p) 
and 13100(p)), a roster of public arbitrators (as defined in FINRA 
Rules 12100(u) and 13100(u)), and a roster of arbitrators who are 
eligible to serve as chairperson of a panel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Has a law degree and is a member of a bar of at least one 
jurisdiction and has served as an arbitrator through award on at least 
two arbitrations administered by an SRO in which hearings were held (an 
``attorney arbitrator''); or
     Has served as an arbitrator through award on at least 
three arbitrations administered by an SRO in which hearings were held.
    FINRA's Office of Dispute Resolution (``ODR'') offers 71 hearing 
locations, including at least one in each state of the United States, 
one in San Juan, Puerto Rico, and one in London, UK. ODR maintains a 
diverse roster of approximately 6,750 arbitrators, of which 
approximately 3,060 are currently classified as public. Approximately 
1,000 of the 3,060 are chair-qualified. Despite the size of the public 
chairperson roster, forum users have raised concerns of a diminished 
public chairperson roster resulting from amendments to the ``public 
arbitrator'' definition that became effective on June 26, 2015.\4\ As a 
result of the amended public arbitrator definition, FINRA reclassified 
approximately 13.8 percent (487 out of 3,512) of its public arbitrator 
roster as non-public and approximately 2.6 percent (93 out of 3,512) of 
its public arbitrator roster were temporarily disqualified and made 
ineligible for service.\5\ Many of the arbitrators who were 
reclassified or disqualified were chair-qualified.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74383 (February 26, 
2015), 80 FR 11695 (Order Approving Filing No. SR-FINRA-2014-028) 
(in part narrowing the public arbitrator definition by adding 
disqualifications relating to, among other things, affiliations with 
the securities industry concerning an arbitrator's family member or 
place of employment).
    \5\ There were an estimated 2,932 public arbitrators after the 
amended public arbitrator definition became effective. Arbitrator 
recruitment since July 2015 added approximately 128 to the public 
arbitrator roster, thereby reaching approximately 3,060 public 
arbitrators as of this rule filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Currently, the public chairperson roster in each hearing location 
ranges from fewer than 40 to over 200. Forum users recognize the risk 
that when the caseload increases, the ratio of cases to qualified 
public chairpersons is higher and FINRA may not have a sufficient 
number of public chairpersons on its roster.
    To expand the roster of public chairpersons in locations where the 
ratio of cases to qualified public chairpersons is higher, FINRA asks 
many public chairpersons to serve in multiple hearing locations. FINRA 
reimburses these chairpersons for their travel, lodging, and meals. 
However, party representatives have told FINRA staff that it is 
inconvenient to schedule hearings with out-of-town arbitrators. 
Moreover, during inclement weather, arbitrators may not be able to 
travel to the hearing location, which would then require parties to 
reschedule and incur additional costs. In addition, some forum users 
suggest that these arbitrators may also need instruction on the state 
laws, procedures, and customs for the hearing venue.
    FINRA has had limited success in enrolling new public chairpersons. 
One reason is that for the last few years, FINRA's arbitration caseload 
has remained low, and public arbitrators were not serving on a 
sufficient number of cases through award to meet the case experience 
requirements for attorney arbitrators outlined above. In 2015, only 24% 
of cases closed by award. However, thus far in 2016, there has been an 
increase in case filings (up 20% compared to the same period in 2015). 
If this trend persists, the need for more public chairpersons could 
outpace the qualification pipeline under the current eligibility 
criteria.
Proposed Amendments to Rules 12400(c) and 13400(c)
    FINRA is proposing to amend Rules 12400(c) and 13400(c) to provide 
that an

[[Page 61289]]

attorney arbitrator would be eligible for the chairperson roster if he 
or she completes chairperson training and serves as an arbitrator 
through award on at least one arbitration, instead of two arbitrations, 
administered by an SRO in which hearings were held. Reducing the case 
experience requirement from two arbitrations to one arbitration could 
add more than 270 attorney arbitrators across 59 of the 71 hearing 
locations, resulting in a nearly 30 percent increase in the number of 
arbitrators who might be eligible to serve as public chairpersons once 
they take chairperson training.
    FINRA is also proposing to replace the bullets in Rules 12400 and 
13400 with numbers for ease of citation.
2. Statutory Basis
    FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the 
provisions of section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\6\ which requires, among 
other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent 
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the 
public interest. FINRA believes that the proposed rule change would 
protect investors and the public interest by potentially increasing the 
number of eligible public chairpersons in all hearing locations, 
without negatively impacting the quality of the chairperson rosters. 
The proposal would address concerns raised by forum users of FINRA's 
diminished public chairperson roster resulting from the amended public 
arbitrator definition and the inconvenience of scheduling hearings with 
out-of-town arbitrators.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in 
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Attorney arbitrators have the 
skillset to efficiently manage hearings and the experience to decide 
motions, among other matters. Their service as an arbitrator through 
award on one arbitration provides them with valuable experience 
regarding the arbitration forum. FINRA rules also require chairperson 
training before an attorney arbitrator becomes eligible to serve on a 
case as chairperson. The path to becoming chair-qualified is not 
mandatory however. ODR prompts candidates to register for chairperson 
training when they meet the other minimum qualifications. Any 
arbitrator who would like additional experience prior to serving as 
chairperson can defer the training until he or she gains that 
experience. In addition, ODR recently implemented a chairperson 
mentorship program to offer new chairpersons an additional resource for 
refining their chairperson skills. FINRA believes that by potentially 
increasing local chairpersons in hearing locations, FINRA would address 
forum users' concerns about scheduling out-of-town public chairpersons. 
Local arbitrators may also need less instruction on state laws, 
procedures, and customs. In addition, if the caseload increases, FINRA 
may not need to expand the use of public chairpersons from outside 
hearing locations, thereby avoiding additional forum user concerns.
    The proposed rule change is expected to provide a greater selection 
of local chairpersons for forum users, thereby potentially lowering 
instances in which chairpersons must travel. In addition, during the 
arbitrator selection process, FINRA supplies all parties with 
Arbitrator Disclosure Reports \7\ that include the arbitration case 
history for each potential arbitrator. Parties can strike arbitrators 
from the list for any reason. FINRA believes that the transparency of 
the Arbitrator Disclosure Report will continue to ensure that parties 
can make informed decisions regarding their chairperson selection and 
that the proposed rule change will increase the parties' choices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Arbitrator Disclosure Report contains background 
information about the potential arbitrator, such as the arbitrator's 
name, classification, skills, employment, education, training, 
conflict information, and any publicly available awards the 
arbitrator issued.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the 
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may 
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to 
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to 
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) by order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule 
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-FINRA-2016-033 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2016-033. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090, on official business days between the hours 
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for 
inspection and copying at the principal office of FINRA. All comments 
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit 
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2016-033 and should be 
submitted on or before September 27, 2016.


[[Page 61290]]


    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-21253 Filed 9-2-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P



                                                  61288                         Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2016 / Notices

                                                  SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE                                    rule change. The text of these statements              public arbitrator definition, FINRA
                                                  COMMISSION                                                 may be examined at the places specified                reclassified approximately 13.8 percent
                                                                                                             in Item IV below. FINRA has prepared                   (487 out of 3,512) of its public arbitrator
                                                  [Release No. 34–78729; File No. SR–FINRA–
                                                  2016–033]
                                                                                                             summaries, set forth in sections A, B,                 roster as non-public and approximately
                                                                                                             and C below, of the most significant                   2.6 percent (93 out of 3,512) of its public
                                                  Self-Regulatory Organizations;                             aspects of such statements.                            arbitrator roster were temporarily
                                                  Financial Industry Regulatory                                                                                     disqualified and made ineligible for
                                                                                                             A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                  Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a                                                                            service.5 Many of the arbitrators who
                                                                                                             Statement of the Purpose of, and
                                                  Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule                                                                                were reclassified or disqualified were
                                                                                                             Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
                                                  12400 of the Code of Arbitration                                                                                  chair-qualified.
                                                                                                             Change                                                    Currently, the public chairperson
                                                  Procedure for Customer Disputes and
                                                  Rule 13400 of the Code of Arbitration                      1. Purpose                                             roster in each hearing location ranges
                                                  Procedure for Industry Disputes                                                                                   from fewer than 40 to over 200. Forum
                                                                                                             Background
                                                  Relating to Broadening Chairperson                                                                                users recognize the risk that when the
                                                  Eligibility in Arbitration                                    FINRA rules require chairpersons,                   caseload increases, the ratio of cases to
                                                                                                             who play a vital role in the                           qualified public chairpersons is higher
                                                  August 30, 2016.                                           administration of arbitration cases, to                and FINRA may not have a sufficient
                                                     Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the                     have arbitrator experience and training                number of public chairpersons on its
                                                  Securities Exchange Act of 1934                            to ensure the quality and efficiency of                roster.
                                                  (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2                    arbitrations. FINRA Rules 12400 and                       To expand the roster of public
                                                  notice is hereby given that on August                      13400 address the Neutral List Selection               chairpersons in locations where the
                                                  18, 2016, Financial Industry Regulatory                    System (‘‘NLSS’’) 3 and arbitrator rosters             ratio of cases to qualified public
                                                  Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the                 and provide, among other matters, that                 chairpersons is higher, FINRA asks
                                                  Securities and Exchange Commission                         an arbitrator is eligible for the                      many public chairpersons to serve in
                                                  (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule                         chairperson roster if he or she has                    multiple hearing locations. FINRA
                                                  change as described in Items I, II, and                    completed chairperson training                         reimburses these chairpersons for their
                                                  III below, which Items have been                           provided by FINRA and:                                 travel, lodging, and meals. However,
                                                  prepared by FINRA. The Commission is                          • Has a law degree and is a member                  party representatives have told FINRA
                                                  publishing this notice to solicit                          of a bar of at least one jurisdiction and              staff that it is inconvenient to schedule
                                                  comments on the proposed rule change                       has served as an arbitrator through                    hearings with out-of-town arbitrators.
                                                  from interested persons.                                   award on at least two arbitrations                     Moreover, during inclement weather,
                                                                                                             administered by an SRO in which                        arbitrators may not be able to travel to
                                                  I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                                                                             hearings were held (an ‘‘attorney                      the hearing location, which would then
                                                  Statement of the Terms of Substance of
                                                                                                             arbitrator’’); or                                      require parties to reschedule and incur
                                                  the Proposed Rule Change
                                                                                                                • Has served as an arbitrator through               additional costs. In addition, some
                                                     FINRA is proposing to amend FINRA                       award on at least three arbitrations                   forum users suggest that these
                                                  Rule 12400 of the Code of Arbitration                      administered by an SRO in which                        arbitrators may also need instruction on
                                                  Procedure for Customer Disputes                            hearings were held.                                    the state laws, procedures, and customs
                                                  (‘‘Customer Code’’) and FINRA Rule                            FINRA’s Office of Dispute Resolution                for the hearing venue.
                                                  13400 of the Code of Arbitration                           (‘‘ODR’’) offers 71 hearing locations,                    FINRA has had limited success in
                                                  Procedure for Industry Disputes                            including at least one in each state of                enrolling new public chairpersons. One
                                                  (‘‘Industry Code,’’ and together with the                  the United States, one in San Juan,                    reason is that for the last few years,
                                                  Customer Code, the ‘‘Codes’’) to provide                   Puerto Rico, and one in London, UK.                    FINRA’s arbitration caseload has
                                                  that an attorney arbitrator would be                       ODR maintains a diverse roster of                      remained low, and public arbitrators
                                                  eligible for the chairperson roster if he                  approximately 6,750 arbitrators, of                    were not serving on a sufficient number
                                                  or she completes chairperson training                      which approximately 3,060 are                          of cases through award to meet the case
                                                  and serves as an arbitrator through                        currently classified as public.                        experience requirements for attorney
                                                  award on at least one arbitration,                         Approximately 1,000 of the 3,060 are                   arbitrators outlined above. In 2015, only
                                                  instead of two arbitrations, administered                  chair-qualified. Despite the size of the               24% of cases closed by award. However,
                                                  by a self-regulatory organization                          public chairperson roster, forum users                 thus far in 2016, there has been an
                                                  (‘‘SRO’’) in which hearings were held.                     have raised concerns of a diminished                   increase in case filings (up 20%
                                                     The text of the proposed rule change                                                                           compared to the same period in 2015).
                                                                                                             public chairperson roster resulting from
                                                  is available on FINRA’s Web site at                                                                               If this trend persists, the need for more
                                                                                                             amendments to the ‘‘public arbitrator’’
                                                  http://www.finra.org, at the principal                                                                            public chairpersons could outpace the
                                                                                                             definition that became effective on June
                                                  office of FINRA and at the                                                                                        qualification pipeline under the current
                                                                                                             26, 2015.4 As a result of the amended
                                                  Commission’s Public Reference Room.                                                                               eligibility criteria.
                                                  II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                            3 The NLSS is a computer system that generates,
                                                                                                                                                                    Proposed Amendments to Rules
                                                  Statement of the Purpose of, and                           on a random basis, lists of arbitrators from FINRA’s
                                                                                                             rosters of arbitrators for the selected hearing        12400(c) and 13400(c)
                                                  Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule                     location for each proceeding. FINRA maintains a          FINRA is proposing to amend Rules
                                                  Change                                                     roster of non-public arbitrators (as defined in
                                                                                                             FINRA Rules 12100(p) and 13100(p)), a roster of        12400(c) and 13400(c) to provide that an
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                     In its filing with the Commission,                      public arbitrators (as defined in FINRA Rules
                                                  FINRA included statements concerning                       12100(u) and 13100(u)), and a roster of arbitrators    an arbitrator’s family member or place of
                                                  the purpose of and basis for the                           who are eligible to serve as chairperson of a panel.   employment).
                                                                                                                4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74383        5 There were an estimated 2,932 public arbitrators
                                                  proposed rule change and discussed any
                                                                                                             (February 26, 2015), 80 FR 11695 (Order Approving      after the amended public arbitrator definition
                                                  comments it received on the proposed                       Filing No. SR–FINRA–2014–028) (in part narrowing       became effective. Arbitrator recruitment since July
                                                                                                             the public arbitrator definition by adding             2015 added approximately 128 to the public
                                                    1 15   U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                                 disqualifications relating to, among other things,     arbitrator roster, thereby reaching approximately
                                                    2 17   CFR 240.19b–4.                                    affiliations with the securities industry concerning   3,060 public arbitrators as of this rule filing.



                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014      17:04 Sep 02, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00108   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM   06SEN1


                                                                                 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2016 / Notices                                         61289

                                                  attorney arbitrator would be eligible for                 who would like additional experience                    (B) institute proceedings to determine
                                                  the chairperson roster if he or she                       prior to serving as chairperson can defer             whether the proposed rule change
                                                  completes chairperson training and                        the training until he or she gains that               should be disapproved.
                                                  serves as an arbitrator through award on                  experience. In addition, ODR recently
                                                  at least one arbitration, instead of two                  implemented a chairperson mentorship                  IV. Solicitation of Comments
                                                  arbitrations, administered by an SRO in                   program to offer new chairpersons an                    Interested persons are invited to
                                                  which hearings were held. Reducing the                    additional resource for refining their                submit written data, views and
                                                  case experience requirement from two                      chairperson skills. FINRA believes that               arguments concerning the foregoing,
                                                  arbitrations to one arbitration could add                 by potentially increasing local                       including whether the proposed rule
                                                  more than 270 attorney arbitrators                        chairpersons in hearing locations,                    change is consistent with the Act.
                                                  across 59 of the 71 hearing locations,                    FINRA would address forum users’                      Comments may be submitted by any of
                                                  resulting in a nearly 30 percent increase                 concerns about scheduling out-of-town                 the following methods:
                                                  in the number of arbitrators who might                    public chairpersons. Local arbitrators
                                                  be eligible to serve as public                            may also need less instruction on state               Electronic Comments
                                                  chairpersons once they take chairperson                   laws, procedures, and customs. In
                                                  training.                                                 addition, if the caseload increases,                    • Use the Commission’s Internet
                                                     FINRA is also proposing to replace                     FINRA may not need to expand the use                  comment form (http://www.sec.gov/
                                                  the bullets in Rules 12400 and 13400                      of public chairpersons from outside                   rules/sro.shtml); or
                                                  with numbers for ease of citation.                        hearing locations, thereby avoiding                     • Send an email to rule-
                                                  2. Statutory Basis                                        additional forum user concerns.                       comments@sec.gov. Please include File
                                                                                                               The proposed rule change is expected               Number SR–FINRA–2016–033 on the
                                                     FINRA believes that the proposed rule
                                                                                                            to provide a greater selection of local               subject line.
                                                  change is consistent with the provisions
                                                                                                            chairpersons for forum users, thereby
                                                  of section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,6 which                                                                         Paper Comments
                                                  requires, among other things, that                        potentially lowering instances in which
                                                  FINRA rules must be designed to                           chairpersons must travel. In addition,                  • Send paper comments in triplicate
                                                  prevent fraudulent and manipulative                       during the arbitrator selection process,              to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
                                                  acts and practices, to promote just and                   FINRA supplies all parties with                       Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
                                                  equitable principles of trade, and, in                    Arbitrator Disclosure Reports 7 that                  Washington, DC 20549–1090.
                                                  general, to protect investors and the                     include the arbitration case history for
                                                                                                            each potential arbitrator. Parties can                All submissions should refer to File
                                                  public interest. FINRA believes that the                                                                        Number SR–FINRA–2016–033. This file
                                                  proposed rule change would protect                        strike arbitrators from the list for any
                                                                                                            reason. FINRA believes that the                       number should be included on the
                                                  investors and the public interest by
                                                                                                            transparency of the Arbitrator                        subject line if email is used. To help the
                                                  potentially increasing the number of
                                                                                                            Disclosure Report will continue to                    Commission process and review your
                                                  eligible public chairpersons in all
                                                                                                            ensure that parties can make informed                 comments more efficiently, please use
                                                  hearing locations, without negatively
                                                                                                            decisions regarding their chairperson                 only one method. The Commission will
                                                  impacting the quality of the chairperson
                                                                                                            selection and that the proposed rule                  post all comments on the Commission’s
                                                  rosters. The proposal would address
                                                                                                            change will increase the parties’                     Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
                                                  concerns raised by forum users of
                                                                                                            choices.                                              rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
                                                  FINRA’s diminished public chairperson
                                                                                                                                                                  submission, all subsequent
                                                  roster resulting from the amended                         C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                     amendments, all written statements
                                                  public arbitrator definition and the                      Statement on Comments on the                          with respect to the proposed rule
                                                  inconvenience of scheduling hearings                      Proposed Rule Change Received From                    change that are filed with the
                                                  with out-of-town arbitrators.                             Members, Participants, or Others                      Commission, and all written
                                                  B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                           Written comments were neither                       communications relating to the
                                                  Statement on Burden on Competition                        solicited nor received.                               proposed rule change between the
                                                     FINRA does not believe that the                                                                              Commission and any person, other than
                                                                                                            III. Date of Effectiveness of the                     those that may be withheld from the
                                                  proposed rule change will result in any                   Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
                                                  burden on competition that is not                                                                               public in accordance with the
                                                                                                            Commission Action                                     provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
                                                  necessary or appropriate in furtherance
                                                  of the purposes of the Act. Attorney                         Within 45 days of the date of                      available for Web site viewing and
                                                  arbitrators have the skillset to efficiently              publication of this notice in the Federal             printing in the Commission’s Public
                                                  manage hearings and the experience to                     Register or within such longer period (i)             Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
                                                  decide motions, among other matters.                      as the Commission may designate up to                 Washington, DC 20549–1090, on official
                                                  Their service as an arbitrator through                    90 days of such date if it finds such                 business days between the hours of 10
                                                  award on one arbitration provides them                    longer period to be appropriate and                   a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
                                                  with valuable experience regarding the                    publishes its reasons for so finding or               also will be available for inspection and
                                                  arbitration forum. FINRA rules also                       (ii) as to which the self-regulatory                  copying at the principal office of
                                                  require chairperson training before an                    organization consents, the Commission                 FINRA. All comments received will be
                                                  attorney arbitrator becomes eligible to                   will:                                                 posted without change; the Commission
                                                  serve on a case as chairperson. The path                     (A) by order approve or disapprove                 does not edit personal identifying
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  to becoming chair-qualified is not                        such proposed rule change, or                         information from submissions. You
                                                  mandatory however. ODR prompts                                                                                  should submit only information that
                                                  candidates to register for chairperson                       7 The Arbitrator Disclosure Report contains        you wish to make available publicly. All
                                                  training when they meet the other                         background information about the potential            submissions should refer to File
                                                                                                            arbitrator, such as the arbitrator’s name,            Number SR–FINRA–2016–033 and
                                                  minimum qualifications. Any arbitrator                    classification, skills, employment, education,
                                                                                                            training, conflict information, and any publicly
                                                                                                                                                                  should be submitted on or before
                                                    6 15   U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).                              available awards the arbitrator issued.               September 27, 2016.


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014     17:04 Sep 02, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00109   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM   06SEN1


                                                  61290                           Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 172 / Tuesday, September 6, 2016 / Notices

                                                    For the Commission, by the Division of                  (totalized) work credits from both                    ACTION:  Seventh Meeting of the SC–233
                                                  Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated                countries.                                            addressing human factors/pilot interface
                                                  authority.8                                                  Persons who wish to obtain copies of               issues for avionics.
                                                  Robert W. Errett,                                         the agreement or want more information
                                                  Deputy Secretary.                                         about its provisions may write to the                 SUMMARY:   The FAA is issuing this notice
                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–21253 Filed 9–2–16; 8:45 am]                Social Security Administration, Office                to advise the public of a meeting of
                                                  BILLING CODE 8011–01–P                                    of International Programs, Post Office                Seventh Meeting of SC–233 Addressing
                                                                                                            Box 17741, Baltimore, MD 21235–7741                   Human Factors/Pilot Interface Issues for
                                                                                                            or visit the Social Security Web site at              Avionics.
                                                  SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION                            www.socialsecurity.gov/international.                 DATES: The meeting will be held
                                                  [Docket No. SSA–2016–0037]                                Carolyn Colvin,                                       September 27–29, 2016, 9:00 a.m. to
                                                                                                                                                                  4:30 p.m.
                                                                                                            Acting Commissioner of Social Security.
                                                  Agreement on Social Security Between                      [FR Doc. 2016–21348 Filed 9–2–16; 8:45 am]            ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at:
                                                  the United States and Hungary; Entry                                                                            1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910,
                                                                                                            BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
                                                  into Force                                                                                                      Washington, DC 20036.
                                                  AGENCY:      Social Security Administration                                                                     FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
                                                  (SSA)                                                                                                           Jennifer Iversen at jiversen@rtca.org or
                                                  ACTION:     Notice                                        DEPARTMENT OF STATE                                   (202) 330–0662, or The RTCA
                                                                                                                                                                  Secretariat, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite
                                                  SUMMARY:   We are giving notice that an                   [Public Notice 9699]                                  910, Washington, DC 20036, or by
                                                  agreement coordinating the United                                                                               telephone at (202) 833–9339, fax at (202)
                                                  States (U.S.) and Hungarian social                        Review of the Designation as a Foreign                833–9434, or Web site at http://
                                                  security programs will enter into force                   Terrorist Organization of Kata’ib                     www.rtca.org.
                                                  on September 1, 2016. The agreement                       Hizballah (and Other Aliases)
                                                  with Hungary, which was signed on                                                                               SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:      Pursuant
                                                  February 3, 2015, is similar to U.S.                         Based upon a review of the                         to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal
                                                  social security agreements already in                     Administrative Record assembled                       Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–
                                                  force with 25 other countries—                            pursuant to Section 219(a)(4)(C) of the               463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is hereby
                                                  Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada,                      Immigration and Nationality Act, as                   given for a meeting of the Seventh
                                                  Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark,                       amended (8 U.S.C. 1189(a)(4)(C))                      Meeting of the SC–233, Addressing
                                                  Finland, France, Germany, Greece,                         (‘‘INA’’), and in consultation with the               Human Factors/Pilot Interface Issues for
                                                  Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea (South),                     Attorney General and the Secretary of                 Avionics. The agenda will include the
                                                  Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway,                      the Treasury, I conclude that the                     following:
                                                  Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic,                    circumstances that were the basis for the             September 27–29, 2016, 9:00 a.m. to
                                                  Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the                       designation of the aforementioned                          4:30 p.m.
                                                  United Kingdom. Section 233 of the                        organization as a Foreign Terrorist
                                                                                                                                                                  Tuesday September 27, 2016
                                                  Social Security Act authorizes                            Organization have not changed in such
                                                  agreements of this type.                                  a manner as to warrant revocation of the              AM
                                                     Like the other agreements, the U.S.-                   designation and that the national                       • Introduction, Upcoming PMC Dates
                                                  Hungarian agreement eliminates dual                       security of the United States does not                     and Deliverable
                                                  social security coverage. This situation                  warrant a revocation of the designation.                • Review of TOR
                                                  exists when a worker from one country                        Therefore, I hereby determine that the               • June meeting summary
                                                  works in the other country and has                        designation of the aforementioned                       • Roadmap for remaining items to be
                                                  coverage under the social security                        organization as a Foreign Terrorist                        completed; notional schedule of
                                                  systems of both countries for the same                    Organization, pursuant to Section 219 of                   activities remaining
                                                  work. When dual coverage occurs, the                      the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189), shall be                       • Consensus on document review
                                                  worker, the worker’s employer, or both                    maintained.                                                process
                                                  may be required to pay social security                       This determination shall be published
                                                  contributions to the two countries                        in the Federal Register.                              PM
                                                  simultaneously without such                                                                                       • Overview of the combined
                                                                                                              Dated: August 23, 2016.
                                                  agreements in force. Under the U.S.-                                                                                 document and initial feedback
                                                                                                            John F. Kerry,
                                                  Hungarian agreement, a worker who is                                                                              • Detailed review of document and
                                                                                                            Secretary of State.                                        identification of work to be done
                                                  sent by an employer in one country to
                                                  work in the other country for five or                     [FR Doc. 2016–21335 Filed 9–2–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                                                                  Wednesday September 28, 2016
                                                  fewer years remains covered only by the                   BILLING CODE 4710–AE–P
                                                                                                                                                                    • Working Groups Break Out Sessions
                                                  sending country. The agreement
                                                                                                                                                                    • End of the Day Working Group
                                                  includes additional rules that eliminate
                                                                                                                                                                       Status Report Outs
                                                  dual U.S. and Hungarian coverage in
                                                  other work situations.                                    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION                          Thursday September 29, 2016
                                                     The agreement also helps eliminate                                                                           AM
                                                                                                            Federal Aviation Administration
                                                  situations where workers suffer a loss of                                                                         • Working Groups Break Out Session
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  benefit rights because they have divided                  Seventh Meeting of SC–233                             PM
                                                  their careers between the two countries.                  Addressing Human Factors/Pilot
                                                  Under the agreement, workers may                                                                                  • Working Group Status
                                                                                                            Interface Issues for Avionics                           1. Working group leader reports
                                                  qualify for partial U.S. benefits or partial
                                                  Hungarian benefits based on combined                      AGENCY: Federal Aviation                                2. Follow-on actions
                                                                                                            Administration (FAA), U.S. Department                   • Meeting Recap, Action Items, Key
                                                    8 17   CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).                             of Transportation (DOT).                                   Dates


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014     17:04 Sep 02, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00110   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\06SEN1.SGM   06SEN1



Document Created: 2018-02-09 12:04:27
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 12:04:27
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation81 FR 61288 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR