81 FR 62066 - Approval of Missouri's Air Quality Implementation Plans; Open Burning Requirements
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 174 (September 8, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 174 (September 8, 2016)
| Page Range | 62066-62068 | |
| FR Document | 2016-21467 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 174 (Thursday, September 8, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 62066-62068] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-21467] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R07-OAR-2016-0470; FRL-9951-88-Region 7] Approval of Missouri's Air Quality Implementation Plans; Open Burning Requirements AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the State of Missouri related to open burning. On November 24, 2009, the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) requested to amend the SIP to replace four area specific open burning rules into one rule that is area specific and applicable state-wide. These revisions to Missouri's SIP do not have an adverse effect on air quality as demonstrated in the technical support document (TSD) which is a part of this docket. EPA's proposd approval of these SIP revisions is being done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Comments must be received on or before October 11, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07- OAR-2016-0470, to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Brown, Environmental [[Page 62067]] Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 913-551-7718, or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and ``our'' refer to EPA. This section provides additional information by addressing the following: I. What is being addressed in this document? II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met? III. What action is EPA taking? I. What is being addressed in this document? EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision submitted by the state of Missouri that replaces four area specific open burning rules with a rule that is applicable state-wide. On November 24, 2009, the MDNR requested to amend the SIP that recinds Missouri Open Burning Restrictions 10 CSR 10-2.100, 10 CSR 10-3.030, 10 CSR 10-4.090, 10 CSR 10-5.070 and consolidates these four rules into a new rule, 10 CSR 10- 6.045. The rule adds language that allows burning of ``trade wastes'' by permit in areas for situations where open burning is in the best interest of the general public or when it can be shown that open burning is the safest and most feasible method of disposal. The rule reserves the right for the staff director to deny, revoke or suspend an open burn permit. It changes the general provisions section by not limiting liability to an individual who is directly responsible for a violation and extends the regulatory liability to any person, such as a property owner who hires an individual to start the fire. The rule also adds the definition of ``untreated wood'' for clarification to aid compliance purposes. II. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met? The state submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In addition, as explained above and in more detail, including a technical analysis in the technical support document which is part of this docket, the revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and implementing regulations. III. What action is EPA taking? EPA is proposing approval of revisions to the Missouri SIP regarding an open burn regulation that replaces four area-specific open burning rules. EPA has conducted a full evaluation of the regulation, which is discussed in detail in the TSD, which is in the docket for this rulemaking. As discussed in detail in the TSD, Missouri submitted emissions and monitoring analyses to make a demonstration that the rule does not violate the requirements of CAA section 110 (l), 42 U.S.C. 7411. In addition, EPA Region 7 performed an analysis of open burning emissions and utilized emissions inventory data from Missouri's Early Progress Plan to analyze over all emissions in the St. Louis area. EPA believes that consolidating the four rules into one single rule creates less confusion and simplifies open burning restrictions for compliance and implementation. Simplifying the rule and permitting process increases clarity and removes uncertainty in the process of applying for an open burn permit. MDNR credits streamlining the permitting rule and process as the reason for the decrease in illegal open burning attempts in the state, especially in and around the St. Louis area. The evidence provided in the TSD included in the docket for the rulemaking and Missouri's SIP submittal and rules show the rule change does not interfere with state's ability to attain or maintain an ambient air quality standard nor interfere with state's progress toward attainment. Specifically, MDNR's SIP revision will not compromise the State's efforts to meet and/or maintain the 1997 8-hour ozone, 2008 8- hour ozone, or Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5 ) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Therefore, EPA supports approving these SIP revisions that add Missouri rule 10 CSR 10-6.045 to replace four rescinded open burning rules: 10 CSR 10-2.100, 10 CSR 10- 3.030, 10 CSR 10-4.090, 10 CSR 10-5.070. We are processing this as a proposed action because we are soliciting comments on this proposed action. Final rulemaking will occur after consideration of any comments. IV. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference the proposed amendments to 40 CFR part 52 as set forth below. Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion in the State implementation plan, have been incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan, are fully Federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\ EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available electronically through www.regulations.gov and/or in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because [[Page 62068]] application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this proposed action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This proposed action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 7, 2016. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this proposed rule does not affect the finality of this rulemaking for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such future rule or action. This proposed action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: August 24, 2016. Mark Hague, Regional Administrator, Region 7. For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40 CFR part 52 as set forth below: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart AA--Missouri 0 2. In Sec. 52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by: 0 a. Removing the entries ``10-2.100'', ``10-3.030'', ``10-4.090'', and ``10-5.070''. 0 b. Adding the entry ``10-6.045'' in numerical order. The addition reads as follows: Sec. 52.1320 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) * * * EPA-Approved Missouri Regulations ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State Missouri citation Title effective date EPA approval date Explanation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Missouri Department of Natural Resources ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chapter 6--Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of Missouri ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * 10-6.045.................... Open Burning 9/30/09 [Date of ............................ Requirements. publication of the final rule in the Federal Register] [Federal Register citation of the final rule]. * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * [FR Doc. 2016-21467 Filed 9-7-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![62066 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
employees are shipyards; that about 73 materials in reference to an electronic ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
percent of establishments with 20–99 submission, you must submit them to AGENCY
employees are contractors who work at the OSHA Docket Office (see ADDRESSES
shipyards or off-site establishments that section). The additional materials must 40 CFR Part 52
perform shipyard employment clearly identify your electronic [EPA–R07–OAR–2016–0470; FRL–9951–88–
operations; and that all very small submission by name, date, and docket Region 7]
establishments with fewer than 20 number so OSHA can attach them to
employees are contractors or off-site your comments. Approval of Missouri’s Air Quality
establishments. OSHA requests Implementation Plans; Open Burning
comment on whether those estimates Because of security-related problems
Requirements
still reflect the industry today? In the there may be a significant delay in the
Subpart F final rule OSHA also assumed receipt of comments by regular mail. For AGENCY: Environmental Protection
that most small and all very small information about security procedures Agency (EPA).
establishments in NAICS 336611 (Ship concerning the delivery of materials by ACTION: Proposed rule.
Building and Repairing) are contractors express delivery, hand delivery and
working at shipyards, and are not messenger or courier service, please SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
themselves shipyards. These contract contact the OSHA Docket Office (see Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
employers, in most cases, will not incur ADDRESSES section). revisions to the State Implementation
the full cost of compliance due to either Plan (SIP) for the State of Missouri
All comments and submissions in related to open burning. On November
their adherence to the host employer’s
response to this RFI, including personal 24, 2009, the Missouri Department of
programs or the type of work they
information, are placed in the public Natural Resources (MDNR) requested to
perform at shipyards. Is this assumption
and conclusion still reasonable? docket without change. Therefore, amend the SIP to replace four area
2. Are there special issues that make OSHA cautions against submitting specific open burning rules into one
the control of fall hazards more difficult certain personal information such as rule that is area specific and applicable
in small firms? social security numbers and birthdates. state-wide. These revisions to Missouri’s
3. Are there any reasons that the All comments and submissions are SIP do not have an adverse effect on air
benefits of reducing exposure to hazards listed in the http://www.regulations.gov quality as demonstrated in the technical
associated with access/egress, scaffolds, index; however, some information (e.g., support document (TSD) which is a part
and fall protection might be different in copyrighted material) is not publicly of this docket. EPA’s proposd approval
small firms than in larger firms? Please available to read or download through of these SIP revisions is being done in
describe any specific concerns related to that Web site. All comments and accordance with the requirements of the
potential impacts on small entities that submissions are available at the OSHA Clean Air Act (CAA).
you believe warrant special attention Docket Office. Information on using DATES: Comments must be received on
from OSHA. Please describe alternatives http://www.regulations.gov to submit or before October 11, 2016.
that might serve to minimize those comments and access dockets is ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
impacts while meeting the requirements available at that Web site. Contact the identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
of the OSH Act.
OSHA Docket Office for information OAR–2016–0470, to http://
IV. Public Participation about materials not available through www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
OSHA invites interested persons to that Web site and for assistance in using instructions for submitting comments.
submit information, comments, data, the Web site to locate and download Once submitted, comments cannot be
studies, and other materials on the docket submissions. edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
issues and questions in this RFI. In The EPA may publish any comment
Electronic copies of this Federal
particular, throughout this RFI OSHA received to its public docket. Do not
Register document are available at
has invited comment on specific issues submit electronically any information
http://www.regulations.gov. This
and requested information and data you consider to be Confidential
document, as well as news releases and Business Information (CBI) or other
about practices at your establishment other relevant documents, are also
and other workplaces in shipyard information whose disclosure is
available at OSHA’s Web site at http:// restricted by statute. Multimedia
employment. When submitting www.osha.gov.
comments to questions or issues raised submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
or revisions to subpart E that OSHA is Authority and Signature accompanied by a written comment.
considering, OSHA requests that the The written comment is considered the
public explain their rationale and, if David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, official comment and should include
possible, provide data and information Assistant Secretary of Labor for discussion of all points you wish to
to support their comments and Occupational Safety and Health, make. The EPA will generally not
recommendations. directed the preparation of this consider comments or comment
You may submit comments in document under the authority granted contents located outside of the primary
response to this RFI (1) electronically at by 29 U.S.C. 653, 655, and 657; 33 submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
http://www.regulations.gov, (2) by hard U.S.C. 941; 29 CFR part 1911; and other file sharing system). For
copy, or (3) by facsimile (FAX). All Secretary’s Order 1–2012 (77 FR 3912). additional submission methods, the full
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
comments, attachments, and other EPA public comment policy,
Signed at Washington, DC, on August 31, information about CBI or multimedia
materials must identify the Agency 2016.
name and the docket number for this submissions, and general guidance on
document (Docket No. OSHA–2013– David Michaels, making effective comments, please visit
0022). You may supplement electronic Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
submissions by uploading document Safety and Health. commenting-epa-dockets.
files electronically. If, instead, you wish [FR Doc. 2016–21369 Filed 9–7–16; 8:45 am] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
to provide a hardcopy of additional BILLING CODE 4510–26–P Steven Brown, Environmental
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:36 Sep 07, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\08SEP1.SGM 08SEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_62240/page/1.svg)
![62068 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2016 / Proposed Rules
application of those requirements would U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
be inconsistent with the CAA; and Representatives, and the Comptroller requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
• Does not provide EPA with the General of the United States prior to organic compounds.
discretionary authority to address, as publication of the rule in the Federal Dated: August 24, 2016.
appropriate, disproportionate human Register. A major rule cannot take effect Mark Hague,
health or environmental effects, using until 60 days after it is published in the
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
practicable and legally permissible Federal Register. This proposed action
methods, under Executive Order 12898 is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 For the reasons stated in the
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). U.S.C. 804(2). preamble, EPA proposes to amend 40
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, CFR part 52 as set forth below:
The SIP is not approved to apply on
petitions for judicial review of this
any Indian reservation land or in any PART 52—APPROVAL AND
action must be filed in the United States
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe PROMULGATION OF
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
has demonstrated that a tribe has IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
circuit by November 7, 2016. Filing a
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
petition for reconsideration by the
country, the rule does not have tribal ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
Administrator of this proposed rule
implications and will not impose continues to read as follows:
does not affect the finality of this
substantial direct costs on tribal rulemaking for the purposes of judicial Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
governments or preempt tribal law as review nor does it extend the time
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 within which a petition for judicial Subpart AA—Missouri
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). review may be filed, and shall not
The Congressional Review Act, 5 postpone the effectiveness of such ■ 2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small future rule or action. This proposed (c) is amended by:
Business Regulatory Enforcement action may not be challenged later in ■ a. Removing the entries ‘‘10–2.100’’,
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides proceedings to enforce its requirements. ‘‘10–3.030’’, ‘‘10–4.090’’, and ‘‘10–
that before a rule may take effect, the (See section 307(b)(2)). 5.070’’.
agency promulgating the rule must ■ b. Adding the entry ‘‘10–6.045’’ in
submit a rule report, which includes a List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 numerical order.
copy of the rule, to each House of the Environmental protection, Air The addition reads as follows:
Congress and to the Comptroller General pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
of the United States. EPA will submit a Incorporation by reference, § 52.1320 Identification of plan.
report containing this proposed action Intergovernmental relations, Lead, * * * * *
and other required information to the Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate (c) * * *
EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS
State effective
Missouri citation Title EPA approval date Explanation
date
Missouri Department of Natural Resources
* * * * * * *
Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of
Missouri
* * * * * * *
10–6.045 ................... Open Burning Requirements .............. 9/30/09 [Date of publication of the final rule in
the Federal Register] [Federal
Register citation of the final rule].
* * * * * * *
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016–21467 Filed 9–7–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:36 Sep 07, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\08SEP1.SGM 08SEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_62240/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-09 13:12:42
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 13:12:42
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before October 11, 2016. | |
| Contact | Steven Brown, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 913-551-7718, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 62066 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR