81 FR 62096 - Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 174 (September 8, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 174 (September 8, 2016)
| Page Range | 62096-62098 | |
| FR Document | 2016-21659 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 174 (Thursday, September 8, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 62096-62098] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-21659] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. Background Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), may request, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') conduct an administrative review of that antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended investigation. All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by the Department discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting date. Respondent Selection In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend to release the CBP data under Administrative Protective Order (``APO'') to all parties having an APO within five days of publication of the initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation Federal Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested in commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications on the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon thereafter as possible. The Department invites comments regarding the CBP data and respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP data on the record of the review. In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: In general, the Department finds that determinations concerning whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. Parties are requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete the Quantity and Value Questionnaire for purposes of respondent selection, in general each company must report volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of this proceeding where the Department considered collapsing that entity, complete quantity and value data for that collapsed entity must be submitted. Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that requests a review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to extend this 90- day deadline, interested parties are advised that, with regard to reviews requested on the basis of anniversary months on or after September 2016, the Department does not intend to extend the 90-day deadline unless the requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary circumstance prevented it from submitting a timely withdrawal request. Determinations by the Department to extend the 90-day deadline will be made on a case-by-case basis. The Department is providing this notice on its Web site, as well as in its ``Opportunity to Request Administrative Review'' notices, so that interested parties will be aware of the manner in [[Page 62097]] which the Department intends to exercise its discretion in the future. Opportunity to Request a Review: Not later than the last day of September 2016,\1\ interested parties may request administrative review of the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with anniversary dates in September for the following periods: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day when the Department is closed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Period of review ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Antidumping Duty Proceedings Belarus: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars A-822-804... 9/1/15-8/31/16 India: Lined Paper Products A-533-843................ 9/1/15-8/31/16 India: Oil Country Tubular Goods A-533-857........... 9/1/15-8/31/16 Indonesia: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars A-560-811. 9/1/15-8/31/16 Japan: Stainless Steel Wire Rod A-588-843............ 9/1/15-8/31/16 Latvia: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars A-449-804.... 9/1/15-8/31/16 Mexico: Magnesia Carbon Bricks A-201-837............. 9/1/15-8/31/16 Moldova: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars -841-804.... 9/1/15-8/31/16 Poland: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars A-455-803.... 9/1/15-8/31/16 Republic of Korea: Oil Country Tubular Goods A-580- 9/1/15-8/31/16 870................................................. Republic of Korea: Stainless Steel Wire Rod A-580-829 9/1/15-8/31/16 Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Oil Country Tubular 9/1/15-8/31/16 Goods A-552-817..................................... Taiwan: Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge A- 9/1/15-8/31/16 583-844............................................. Taiwan: Oil Country Tubular Goods A-583-850.......... 9/1/15-8/31/16 Taiwan: Raw Flexible Magnets A-583-842............... 9/1/15-8/31/16 Taiwan: Stainless Steel Wire Rod A-583-828........... 9/1/15-8/31/16 The People's Republic of China: Freshwater Crawfish 9/1/15-8/31/16 Tailmeat A-570-848.................................. The People's Republic of China: Foundry Coke A-570- 9/1/15-8/31/16 862................................................. The People's Republic of China: Kitchen Appliance 9/1/15-8/31/16 Shelving and Racks A-570-941........................ The People's Republic of China: Lined Paper Products 9/1/15-8/31/16 A-570-901........................................... The People's Republic of China: Magnesia Carbon 9/1/15-8/31/16 Bricks A-570-954.................................... The People's Republic of China: Narrow Woven Ribbons 9/1/15-8/31/16 with Woven Selvedge A-570-952....................... The People's Republic of China: New Pneumatic Off-The- 9/1/15-8/31/16 Road Tires A-570-912................................ The People's Republic of China: Raw Flexible Magnets 9/1/15-8/31/16 A-570-922........................................... The People's Republic of China: Steel Concrete 9/1/15-8/31/16 Reinforcing Bars A-570-860.......................... Turkey: Oil Country Tubular Goods A-489-816.......... 9/1/15-8/31/16 Ukraine: Solid Agricultural Grade Ammonium Nitrate A- 9/1/15-8/31/16 823-810............................................. Ukraine: Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bars A-823-809... 9/1/15-8/31/16 Countervailing Duty Proceedings India: Lined Paper Products C-533-844................ 1/1/15-12/31/15 India: Oil Country Tubular Goods C-533-858........... 1/1/15-12/31/15 The People's Republic of China: Kitchen Appliance 1/1/15-12/31/15 Shelving and Racks C-570-942........................ The People's Republic of China: Narrow Woven Ribbons 1/1/15-12/31/15 with Woven Selvedge C-570-953....................... The People's Republic of China: New Pneumatic Off-The- 1/1/15-12/31/15 Road Tires C-570-913................................ The People's Republic of China: Raw Flexible Magnets 1/1/15-12/31/15 C-570-923........................................... The People's Republic of China: Magnesia Carbon 1/1/15-12/31/15 Bricks C-570-955.................................... Turkey: Oil Country Tubular Goods C-489-817.......... 1/1/15-12/31/15 Suspension agreements Argentina: Lemon Juice A-357-818..................... 9/1/15-8/31/16 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested party or an interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular producers or exporters. If the interested party intends for the Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which was produced in more than one country of origin and each country of origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the request is intended to cover. Note that, for any party the Department was unable to locate in prior segments, the Department will not accept a request for an administrative review of that party absent new information as to the party's location. Moreover, if the interested party who files a request for review is unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it requested the review, the interested party must provide an explanation of the attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same time it files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to determine if the interested party's attempts were reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii). As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non- Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) the Department clarified its practice with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties [[Page 62098]] on imports of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The public should be aware of this clarification in determining whether to request an administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping findings and orders.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Further, as explained in Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013), the Department clarified its practice with regard to the conditional review of the non-market economy (NME) entity in administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders. The Department will no longer consider the NME entity as an exporter conditionally subject to administrative reviews. Accordingly, the NME entity will not be under review unless the Department specifically receives a request for, or self-initiates, a review of the NME entity.\3\ In administrative reviews of antidumping duty orders on merchandise from NME countries where a review of the NME entity has not been initiated, but where an individual exporter for which a review was initiated does not qualify for a separate rate, the Department will issue a final decision indicating that the company in question is part of the NME entity. However, in that situation, because no review of the NME entity was conducted, the NME entity's entries were not subject to the review and the rate for the NME entity is not subject to change as a result of that review (although the rate for the individual exporter may change as a function of the finding that the exporter is part of the NME entity). Following initiation of an antidumping administrative review when there is no review requested of the NME entity, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters not named in the initiation notice, including those that were suspended at the NME entity rate. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties should specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names of such exporters in their request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- All requests must be filed electronically in Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS'') on Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS Web site at http://access.trade.gov.\4\ Further, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on the petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department will publish in the Federal Register a notice of ``Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation'' for requests received by the last day of September 2016. If the Department does not receive, by the last day of September 2016, a request for review of entries covered by an order, finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the period identified above, the Department will instruct CBP to assess antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or bond for) estimated antidumping or countervailing duties required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered. For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period of the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review. This notice is not required by statute but is published as a service to the international trading community. Dated: August 25, 2016. Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2016-21659 Filed 9-7-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![62096 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2016 / Notices
the Decision Memorandum are identical Background there has been a determination to
in content. Each year during the anniversary collapse certain companies in a
month of the publication of an previous segment of this antidumping
Final Results of Review
antidumping or countervailing duty proceeding (i.e., investigation,
Pursuant to sections 752(c)(1) and (3) order, finding, or suspended administrative review, new shipper
of the Act, we determine that revocation investigation, an interested party, as review or changed circumstances
of the Russia Order would be likely to defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff review). For any company subject to this
lead to continuation or recurrence of Act of 1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’), review, if the Department determined,
dumping at weighted average margins may request, in accordance with 19 CFR or continued to treat, that company as
up to the following: 351.213, that the Department of collapsed with others, the Department
Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) conduct will assume that such companies
Weighted-
an administrative review of that continue to operate in the same manner
average and will collapse them for respondent
Exporter/producer antidumping or countervailing duty
margin
(percent) order, finding, or suspended selection purposes. Otherwise, the
investigation. Department will not collapse companies
JSC Severstal ....................... 73.59 All deadlines for the submission of for purposes of respondent selection.
Russia-Wide Rate ................. 184.56 comments or actions by the Department Parties are requested to (a) identify
discussed below refer to the number of which companies subject to review
Administrative Protective Order calendar days from the applicable previously were collapsed, and (b)
starting date. provide a citation to the proceeding in
This notice also serves as the only which they were collapsed. Further, if
reminder to parties subject to Respondent Selection companies are requested to complete
administrative protective order (APO) of the Quantity and Value Questionnaire
their responsibility concerning the In the event the Department limits the
number of respondents for individual for purposes of respondent selection, in
return or destruction of proprietary general each company must report
information disclosed under APO in examination for administrative reviews
initiated pursuant to requests made for volume and value data separately for
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. itself. Parties should not include data
Timely notification of the return of the orders identified below, the
Department intends to select for any other party, even if they believe
destruction of APO materials or they should be treated as a single entity
conversion to judicial protective order is respondents based on U.S. Customs and with that other party. If a company was
hereby requested. Failure to comply Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S.
imports during the period of review. We collapsed with another company or
with the regulations and terms of an companies in the most recently
APO is a violation which is subject to intend to release the CBP data under
Administrative Protective Order completed segment of this proceeding
sanction. where the Department considered
(‘‘APO’’) to all parties having an APO
The Department is issuing and within five days of publication of the collapsing that entity, complete quantity
publishing these final results and notice initiation notice and to make our and value data for that collapsed entity
in accordance with sections 751(c), decision regarding respondent selection must be submitted.
752(c), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 within 21 days of publication of the
CFR 351.218. Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for
initiation Federal Register notice. Administrative Review
Dated: August 30, 2016. Therefore, we encourage all parties
Paul Piquado, interested in commenting on respondent Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and selection to submit their APO party that requests a review may
Compliance/ applications on the date of publication withdraw that request within 90 days of
[FR Doc. 2016–21652 Filed 9–7–16; 8:45 am] of the initiation notice, or as soon the date of publication of the notice of
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P thereafter as possible. The Department initiation of the requested review. The
invites comments regarding the CBP regulation provides that the Department
data and respondent selection within may extend this time if it is reasonable
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE five days of placement of the CBP data to do so. In order to provide parties
on the record of the review. additional certainty with respect to
International Trade Administration In the event the Department decides when the Department will exercise its
it is necessary to limit individual discretion to extend this 90-day
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty examination of respondents and deadline, interested parties are advised
Order, Finding, or Suspended conduct respondent selection under that, with regard to reviews requested
Investigation; Opportunity To Request section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: on the basis of anniversary months on
Administrative Review In general, the Department finds that or after September 2016, the Department
determinations concerning whether does not intend to extend the 90-day
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, deadline unless the requestor
International Trade Administration, particular companies should be
‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single demonstrates that an extraordinary
Department of Commerce. circumstance prevented it from
entity for purposes of calculating
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: antidumping duty rates) require a submitting a timely withdrawal request.
Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD substantial amount of detailed Determinations by the Department to
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, information and analysis, which often extend the 90-day deadline will be
Enforcement and Compliance, require follow-up questions and made on a case-by-case basis.
International Trade Administration, analysis. Accordingly, the Department The Department is providing this
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th will not conduct collapsing analyses at notice on its Web site, as well as in its
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., the respondent selection phase of this ‘‘Opportunity to Request Administrative
Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) review and will not collapse companies Review’’ notices, so that interested
482–4735. at the respondent selection phase unless parties will be aware of the manner in
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:34 Sep 07, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM 08SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_62270/page/1.svg)
![62098 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2016 / Notices
on imports of merchandise where access.trade.gov.4 Further, in AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and
intermediate firms are involved. The accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(l)(i), Compliance, International Trade
public should be aware of this a copy of each request must be served Administration, Department of
clarification in determining whether to on the petitioner and each exporter or Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
request an administrative review of producer specified in the request. Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
merchandise subject to antidumping The Department will publish in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
findings and orders.2 Federal Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation
of Administrative Review of Background
Further, as explained in Antidumping
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty On July 20, 2016, the Department of
Proceedings: Announcement of Change
Order, Finding, or Suspended Commerce (the Department) initiated a
in Department Practice for Respondent
Investigation’’ for requests received by countervailing duty investigation on
Selection in Antidumping Duty
the last day of September 2016. If the finished carbon steel flanges from
Proceedings and Conditional Review of
Department does not receive, by the last India.1 Currently, the preliminary
the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME
day of September 2016, a request for determination is due no later than
Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR
review of entries covered by an order, September 23, 2016.
65963 (November 4, 2013), the
finding, or suspended investigation
Department clarified its practice with Postponement of the Preliminary
listed in this notice and for the period
regard to the conditional review of the identified above, the Department will Determinations
non-market economy (NME) entity in instruct CBP to assess antidumping or Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of
administrative reviews of antidumping countervailing duties on those entries at 1930, as amended (the Act), requires the
duty orders. The Department will no a rate equal to the cash deposit of (or Department to issue the preliminary
longer consider the NME entity as an bond for) estimated antidumping or determination in a countervailing duty
exporter conditionally subject to countervailing duties required on those investigation within 65 days after the
administrative reviews. Accordingly, entries at the time of entry, or date on which the Department initiated
the NME entity will not be under review withdrawal from warehouse, for the investigation. However, if the
unless the Department specifically consumption and to continue to collect petitioner makes a timely request for an
receives a request for, or self-initiates, a the cash deposit previously ordered. extension in accordance with 19 CFR
review of the NME entity.3 In For the first administrative review of 351.205(e), section 703(c)(1)(A) of the
administrative reviews of antidumping any order, there will be no assessment Act allows the Department to postpone
duty orders on merchandise from NME of antidumping or countervailing duties the preliminary determination until no
countries where a review of the NME on entries of subject merchandise later than 130 days after the date on
entity has not been initiated, but where entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, which the Department initiated the
an individual exporter for which a for consumption during the relevant investigation.
review was initiated does not qualify for provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of On August 24, 2016, Petitioners 2
a separate rate, the Department will the order, if such a gap period is submitted a timely request pursuant to
issue a final decision indicating that the applicable to the period of review. section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act and 19
company in question is part of the NME This notice is not required by statute CFR 351.205(e) to postpone the
entity. However, in that situation, but is published as a service to the preliminary determination.3 In its
because no review of the NME entity international trading community. request, Petitioners state: ‘‘As the
was conducted, the NME entity’s entries Dated: August 25, 2016. Department has not yet made a selection
were not subject to the review and the Christian Marsh, of mandatory respondents, Petitioners
rate for the NME entity is not subject to seek postponement of the preliminary
Deputy Assistant Secretary, for Antidumping
change as a result of that review and Countervailing Duty Operations. determination to permit the Department
(although the rate for the individual sufficient time to receive, analyze, and
[FR Doc. 2016–21659 Filed 9–7–16; 8:45 am]
exporter may change as a function of the comment on the questionnaire
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
finding that the exporter is part of the responses prior to the preliminary
NME entity). Following initiation of an determination.’’ 4
antidumping administrative review DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE For the reasons stated above and
when there is no review requested of the because there are no compelling reasons
NME entity, the Department will International Trade Administration to deny the request, the Department, in
instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all accordance with section 703(c)(1)(A) of
[C–533–872]
exporters not named in the initiation the Act, is postponing the deadline for
notice, including those that were Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From the preliminary determination to no
suspended at the NME entity rate. India: Postponement of Preliminary later than 124 days after the day on
All requests must be filed Determination in the Countervailing which the investigation was initiated.
electronically in Enforcement and Duty Investigation As a result, the Department will issue its
Compliance’s Antidumping and preliminary determination no later than
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, November 21, 2016. In accordance with
Countervailing Duty Centralized International Trade Administration,
Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’) Department of Commerce. 1 See Finished Carbon Steel Flanges From India:
on Enforcement and Compliance’s
DATES: Effective September 8, 2016. Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 81
ACCESS Web site at http://
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
FR 49625 (July 28, 2016).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 2 Weldbend Corporation (Weldbend) and Boltex
2 See also the Enforcement and Compliance Web
Emily Maloof at (202) 482–5649, or Manufacturing Co., L.P. (Boltex) (collectively,
site at http://trade.gov/enforcement/. Davina Friedmann at (202) 482–0698, Petitioners).
3 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties 3 See Letter from Petitioners, ‘‘Re: Finished
should specify that they are requesting a review of 4 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Carbon Steel Flanges from India: Request for the
entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; Postponement of the Preliminary Determination,’’
the extent possible, include the names of such Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR dated August 24, 2016.
exporters in their request. 39263 (July 6, 2011). 4 Id., at 1–2.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:34 Sep 07, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM 08SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_62270/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-09 13:12:39
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 13:12:39
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 62096 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR