81 FR 62125 - Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request; Information Collection Request for Plywood and Composite Wood Products National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Residual Risk and Technology Review (RTR)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 174 (September 8, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 174 (September 8, 2016)
| Page Range | 62125-62127 | |
| FR Document | 2016-21507 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 174 (Thursday, September 8, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 62125-62127] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-21507] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0243; FRL-9951-55-OAR] Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request; Information Collection Request for Plywood and Composite Wood Products National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Residual Risk and Technology Review (RTR) AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to submit an information collection request (ICR), ``Information Collection Request for Plywood and Composite Wood Products National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) Residual Risk and Technology Review (RTR)'' (EPA ICR No. 2552.01, OMB Control No. 2060--NEW) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Before doing so, the EPA is soliciting public comments on specific aspects of the proposed information collection as described below. This is a request for approval of a new collection. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 7, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR- 2016-0243, online using http://www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by email to [email protected], or by mail to EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460. The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Bradfield, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (E143- 03), Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number: (919) 541-3062; fax number: (919) 541-3470; email address: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone number for the Docket Center is 202-566-1742. The telephone number for the public reading room is 202-566-1744. For additional information about the EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets. Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the EPA is soliciting comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and its practical feasibility and the assumptions used; (iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. The EPA is evaluating the use of the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) to collect ICR data for this category. Using CEDRI can both reduce the ICR collection burden through the use of on-line information technology and reduce reporting burdens in the future for affected facilities in the category. The EPA is interested in receiving comments on the use of this data collection approach. The EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for review and approval. At that time, the EPA will issue another Federal Register notice to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. Abstract: This ICR is being conducted by the EPA's Office of Air and Radiation to assist the EPA Administrator to fulfill her responsibilities under sections 112(d) and 112(f) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), as amended. The CAA requires a review of each NESHAP following the application of the standards to determine any remaining risk and whether the standards protect public health with an ample margin of safety and to determine whether more stringent standards are necessary to prevent an adverse environmental effect. The CAA also requires that the standard be reviewed and revised, as necessary, taking into account developments in practices, processes, and control technology. For efficiency and to reduce burden, these reviews are conducted concurrently and known as residual risk and technology reviews (RTR). In addition to the CAA reviews, in 2007, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a remand requiring the administrator to develop standards for emission units identified in the Plywood and Composite Wood Products (PCWP) NESHAP for which emission limits were not promulgated. The EPA reviewed its emission inventory and compliance databases to determine if its current information was sufficient to conduct an RTR for the PCWP NESHAP and develop emission limits for the remanded PCWP process units. The available data for the affected population of plywood, composite wood products, and lumber dry kilns was found to be insufficient to adequately review and evaluate the emission standards for these source categories. The ICR will provide specific, required information, including emission inventories, compliance demonstrations, process changes, and information about control technologies/practices adopted since the application of maximum achievable control technology (MACT). Table 1 contains the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes of facilities impacted by this information collection. Only major sources and synthetic area sources for these NESHAP categories will be affected by this information collection. There will be a survey phase, Phase I, and a contingent testing phase, Phase [[Page 62126]] II, in this information collection. Phase I seeks to collect facility- level information (e.g., facility name, location, contact information, and process unit details), emissions information, compliance data, control information, and descriptions of technological innovations. Phase I will be sent to all known operators of PCWP facilities that are major sources for hazardous air pollutants (HAP) regulated by these standards and synthetic area sources which used technology to avoid major PCWP NESHAP source status. Phase I responses may contain CBI. The survey will be provided and collected in an electronic format. The submission requires the owner or operator to certify that the information being provided is accurate and complete. If the emission information that we collect in Phase I is inadequate to assess the remaining risk following the application of MACT and/or to assess technological developments in practices, processes, or controls that reduce HAP from PCWP facilities, we plan to require facilities to conduct emissions testing and will implement Phase II. Phase II, the testing phase of the survey, will be sent to selected PCWP facilities across the different industry segments. The emissions information collected in Phase II, if implemented, will not be CBI. However, production information will also be collected so that adequate emission factors can be generated from the required testing. There may be some production information associated with the emissions tests that facilities will consider CBI. If OMB approves this ICR, this one-time collection will solicit information under authority of CAA section 114. The EPA intends to provide the survey in electronic format. The survey will be sent to all facilities identified as being affected by the PCWP NESHAP through information available to the Agency. The EPA envisions allowing recipients 90 days to respond to the survey after it is approved by the OMB and distributed to the PCWP industry for their response. Non- confidential information from this ICR would be made available to the public. Any information designated as confidential by a survey respondent that the EPA subsequently determines to constitute CBI or a trade secret under the EPA's CBI regulations at 40 CFR part 2, subpart B, will be protected pursuant to those regulations and, for trade secrets, under 18 U.S.C. 1905. If no claim of confidentiality accompanies the information when it is received by the EPA, it may be made available to the public by the EPA without further notice pursuant to the EPA regulations at 40 CFR 2.203. The EPA identified facilities potentially subject to the PCWP MACT using the Air Facility System (AFS) database, the Facility Registry Service (FRS) database, and the Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) database. Facilities were maintained in the facility list if the affected facilities were labeled as major sources or synthetic minor sources. This conservative approach to identifying affected facilities may overestimate the number of respondents. Table 1--Examples of Regulated Industries ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NAICS c odes Examples of regulated entities ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 321113................... Sawmills with lumber kilns. 321211................... Hardwood plywood and veneer plants. 321212................... Softwood plywood and veneer plants. 321213................... Structural Wood Members, Not Elsewhere Classified (engineered wood products plants). 321219................... Reconstituted Wood Product Manufacturing. 32199.................... All Other Wood Product Manufacturing. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This ICR was developed specifically for facilities regulated by the PCWP NESHAP rule and has been tailored to the processes of each PCWP manufacturing segment listed in the above table. The federal emission standard that is the subject of this information collection is the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Plywood and Composite Wood Products (40 CFR part 63, subpart DDDD). We have placed in the docket a draft version of the survey and are considering two additional response options for which we are requesting comment. First, we are considering an optional form for submitting emission information which includes default emission factors from AP-42 and other industry technical publications. Respondents can use the listed emission factors or their own factors. We believe this option may reduce the survey burden. We are requesting comments about whether such an emission estimation tool would be useful. Also, we plan to provide facilities the option of an on-line, electronic submission approach that will allow the entry of just the facility and sub- facility information for the Phase I survey directly into the FRS database using the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI). While we anticipate that entering data to the FRS database through CEDRI would reduce burden for the survey and for future EPA information collection activities, we have not estimated the potential burden reduction. Comments on the CEDRI/FRS information collection approach addressing its usefulness as an alternative and whether additional response time would be required are requested. Respondents are asked to complete forms from available information, and no request is made to create or develop emission estimates from information in the literature. Responses to the ICR are mandatory under the authority of section 114 of the CAA. Form Numbers: None. Respondents/affected entities: Phase I of this ICR is specifically requesting information from major source facilities regulated by the PCWP NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart DDDD) and synthetic area sources whose permit limits remove the facility from PCWP applicability. Phase II of this ICR, if implemented in whole or part, will only request information from major source facilities regulated by the PCWP NESHAP (40 CFR part 63, subpart DDDD). Respondent's obligation to respond: Responses to the ICR are mandatory under the authority of section 114 of the CAA. Estimated number of respondents: 425 (total). Frequency of response: Once. Total estimated burden: Since phase II of this ICR is contingent on the information collected in phase I, there is a range in the total estimated burden for this ICR. The range is from $12,003,650 to $19,778,180 and from 106,065 to 114,306 hours (per year), depending on whether Phase II is required. Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.03(b). [[Page 62127]] The Agency burden to implement Phase I is 14,658 hours and, potentially, 994 hours for Phase II. The estimated cumulative Agency burden to administer this ICR (all phases) is 15,652 hours. Total estimated cost: The estimated costs for the PCWP industry for Phase I is $11,996,531, which includes $7,119 in operating and maintenance (O&M) costs to cover mailing hard copies of Phase I. The estimated Agency costs to administer Phase I is $511,033, which includes $7,353 in O&M costs to send certified CAA section 114 letters to all respondents selected for Phase I. Since the actions in Phase II are contingent on the information collected in Phase I, the cost for Phase II could range from zero to the amount needed to conduct all the potential tests outlined in the test plan, the maximum amount. The EPA can only estimate the cost on the maximum amount at this time, however, since the Phase I information has not been collected. The estimated costs for the PCWP industry for Phase II, if implemented in whole, is $7,774,530, which includes $637 in O&M costs to cover mailing hard copies of Phase II. The estimated Agency costs to administer Phase II in whole is $34,872, which includes $706 in O&M costs to send certified CAA section 114 letters to all respondents selected for Phase II surveys with electronic return receipt. The resulting maximum total industry costs for all phases of this ICR is estimated to be $19,778,180, which includes $7,755 in O&M costs to cover mailing hard copies of Phase I responses and Phase II. The estimated cumulative Agency costs to administer this ICR (all phases) is $545,905, which includes $8,059 in O&M costs to send certified CAA section 114 letters to all respondents selected for Phase I and Phase II surveys with electronic return receipt. Changes in Estimates: This is a new ICR, so this section does not apply. Peter Tsirigotis, Director, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. [FR Doc. 2016-21507 Filed 9-7-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2016 / Notices 62125
Total estimated cost: $3,064,594 (per Business Information (CBI), or other The EPA will consider the comments
year), includes $3,005,000 non-labor information whose disclosure is received and amend the ICR as
costs. restricted by statute. appropriate. The final ICR package will
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John then be submitted to OMB for review
Spencer Clark,
Bradfield, Sector Policies and Programs and approval. At that time, the EPA will
Acting Director, Regulatory Support Division. issue another Federal Register notice to
Division, Office of Air Quality Planning
[FR Doc. 2016–21592 Filed 9–7–16; 8:45 am] announce the submission of the ICR to
and Standards (E143–03),
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Environmental Protection Agency, 109 OMB and the opportunity to submit
T.W. Alexander Drive, Research additional comments to OMB.
Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone Abstract: This ICR is being conducted
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION by the EPA’s Office of Air and Radiation
AGENCY number: (919) 541–3062; fax number:
(919) 541–3470; email address: to assist the EPA Administrator to fulfill
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0243; FRL–9951–55– bradfield.john@epa.gov. her responsibilities under sections
OAR] 112(d) and 112(f) of the Clean Air Act
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(CAA), as amended. The CAA requires
Proposed Information Collection Supporting documents which explain in a review of each NESHAP following the
Request; Comment Request; detail the information that the EPA will application of the standards to
Information Collection Request for be collecting are available in the public determine any remaining risk and
Plywood and Composite Wood docket for this ICR. The docket can be whether the standards protect public
Products National Emission Standards viewed online at http:// health with an ample margin of safety
for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) www.regulations.gov or in person at the and to determine whether more
Residual Risk and Technology Review EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA WJC stringent standards are necessary to
(RTR) West Building, Room 3334, 1301 prevent an adverse environmental
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, effect. The CAA also requires that the
AGENCY: Environmental Protection DC. The telephone number for the standard be reviewed and revised, as
Agency (EPA). Docket Center is 202–566–1742. The necessary, taking into account
ACTION: Notice. telephone number for the public reading developments in practices, processes,
room is 202–566–1744. For additional and control technology. For efficiency
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection information about the EPA’s public
Agency (EPA) is planning to submit an and to reduce burden, these reviews are
docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/ conducted concurrently and known as
information collection request (ICR), dockets.
‘‘Information Collection Request for residual risk and technology reviews
Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of (RTR). In addition to the CAA reviews,
Plywood and Composite Wood Products the PRA, the EPA is soliciting comments
National Emission Standards for in 2007, the United States Court of
and information to enable it to: Appeals for the District of Columbia
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) (i) Evaluate whether the proposed Circuit issued a remand requiring the
Residual Risk and Technology Review collection of information is necessary administrator to develop standards for
(RTR)’’ (EPA ICR No. 2552.01, OMB for the proper performance of the emission units identified in the
Control No. 2060—NEW) to the Office of functions of the Agency, including Plywood and Composite Wood Products
Management and Budget (OMB) for whether the information will have (PCWP) NESHAP for which emission
review and approval in accordance with practical utility; limits were not promulgated.
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 (ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the The EPA reviewed its emission
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Before doing so, the Agency’s estimate of the burden of the inventory and compliance databases to
EPA is soliciting public comments on proposed collection of information, determine if its current information was
specific aspects of the proposed including the validity of the sufficient to conduct an RTR for the
information collection as described methodology and its practical feasibility PCWP NESHAP and develop emission
below. This is a request for approval of and the assumptions used; limits for the remanded PCWP process
a new collection. An Agency may not (iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and units. The available data for the affected
conduct or sponsor and a person is not clarity of the information to be population of plywood, composite wood
required to respond to a collection of collected; and products, and lumber dry kilns was
information unless it displays a (iv) Minimize the burden of the found to be insufficient to adequately
currently valid OMB control number. collection of information on those who review and evaluate the emission
DATES: Comments must be submitted on are to respond, including through the standards for these source categories.
or before November 7, 2016. use of appropriate automated electronic, The ICR will provide specific, required
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, mechanical, or other technological information, including emission
referencing Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– collection techniques or other forms of inventories, compliance
OAR–2016–0243, online using http:// information technology, e.g., permitting demonstrations, process changes, and
www.regulations.gov (our preferred electronic submission of responses. The information about control technologies/
method), by email to A-and-R-docket@ EPA is evaluating the use of the practices adopted since the application
epa.gov, or by mail to EPA Docket Compliance and Emissions Data of maximum achievable control
Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Reporting Interface (CEDRI) to collect technology (MACT). Table 1 contains
Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, ICR data for this category. Using CEDRI the North American Industry
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., can both reduce the ICR collection Classification System (NAICS) codes of
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Washington, DC 20460. burden through the use of on-line facilities impacted by this information
The EPA’s policy is that all comments information technology and reduce collection. Only major sources and
received will be included in the public reporting burdens in the future for synthetic area sources for these
docket without change, including any affected facilities in the category. The NESHAP categories will be affected by
personal information provided, unless EPA is interested in receiving comments this information collection.
the comment includes profanity, threats, on the use of this data collection There will be a survey phase, Phase
information claimed to be Confidential approach. I, and a contingent testing phase, Phase
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:34 Sep 07, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM 08SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_62299/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 174 / Thursday, September 8, 2016 / Notices 62127
The Agency burden to implement FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Form No.: N/A.
Phase I is 14,658 hours and, potentially, COMMISSION Type of Review: Extension of a
994 hours for Phase II. The estimated currently approved collection.
[OMB 3060–0360] Respondents: Business or other for-
cumulative Agency burden to
administer this ICR (all phases) is profit entities, not-for-profit institutions,
Information Collection Being Reviewed
15,652 hours. and state, local and tribal government.
by the Federal Communications
Number of Respondents: 19,919
Total estimated cost: The estimated Commission
respondents; 19,919 responses.
costs for the PCWP industry for Phase AGENCY: Federal Communications Estimated Time per Response: 27.3–
I is $11,996,531, which includes $7,119 Commission. 95 hours.
in operating and maintenance (O&M) ACTION: Notice and request for Frequency of Response:
costs to cover mailing hard copies of comments. Recordkeeping requirement.
Phase I. The estimated Agency costs to Obligation to Respond: Required to
administer Phase I is $511,033, which SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort obtain or retain benefits. The statutory
includes $7,353 in O&M costs to send to reduce paperwork burdens, and as authority for this collection is contained
certified CAA section 114 letters to all required by the Paperwork Reduction in 47 U.S.C. 151–155, 301–609.
respondents selected for Phase I. Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– Total Annual Burden: 561,188 hours.
3520), the Federal Communications Annual Cost Burden: None.
Since the actions in Phase II are Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No
Commission (FCC or Commission)
contingent on the information collected impact(s).
invites the general public and other
in Phase I, the cost for Phase II could Federal agencies to take this Nature and Extent of Confidentiality:
range from zero to the amount needed opportunity to comment on the There is no need for confidentiality with
to conduct all the potential tests following information collections. this collection of information.
outlined in the test plan, the maximum Comments are requested concerning: Needs and Uses: The Commission
amount. The EPA can only estimate the Whether the proposed collection of will submit this extension (no change in
cost on the maximum amount at this information is necessary for the proper the recordkeeping requirement) to the
time, however, since the Phase I performance of the functions of the OMB after this 60 day comment period
information has not been collected. The Commission, including whether the to obtain the full three-year clearance
estimated costs for the PCWP industry information shall have practical utility; from them. The information collection
for Phase II, if implemented in whole, the accuracy of the Commission’s requirements are as follows:
is $7,774,530, which includes $637 in burden estimate; ways to enhance the Section 80.409(c), Public Coast
O&M costs to cover mailing hard copies quality, utility, and clarity of the Station Logs: This requirement is
information collected; ways to minimize necessary to document the operation
of Phase II. The estimated Agency costs
the burden of the collection of and public correspondence of public
to administer Phase II in whole is
information on the respondents, coast radio telegraph, public coast
$34,872, which includes $706 in O&M
including the use of automated radiotelephone stations, and Alaska
costs to send certified CAA section 114 public-fixed stations, including the
letters to all respondents selected for collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; and ways to logging of distress and safety calls
Phase II surveys with electronic return where applicable. Entries must be made
receipt. further reduce the information
collection burden on small business giving details of all work performed
The resulting maximum total industry concerns with fewer than 25 employees. which may affect the proper operation
costs for all phases of this ICR is The FCC may not conduct or sponsor of the station. Logs must be retained by
estimated to be $19,778,180, which a collection of information unless it the licensee for a period of two years
includes $7,755 in O&M costs to cover displays a currently valid OMB control from the date of entry, and, where
mailing hard copies of Phase I responses number. No person shall be subject to applicable, for such additional periods
and Phase II. The estimated cumulative any penalty for failing to comply with such as logs relating to a distress
Agency costs to administer this ICR (all a collection of information subject to the situation or disaster must be retained for
phases) is $545,905, which includes PRA that does not display a valid OMB three years from the date of entry in the
$8,059 in O&M costs to send certified control number. log. If the Commission has notified the
CAA section 114 letters to all licensee of an investigation, the related
DATES: Written PRA comments should
respondents selected for Phase I and logs must be retained until the licensee
be submitted on or before November 7,
is specifically authorized in writing to
Phase II surveys with electronic return 2016. If you anticipate that you will be
destroy them. Logs relating to any claim
receipt. submitting comments, but find it
or complaint of which the station
Changes in Estimates: This is a new difficult to do so within the period of
licensee has notice must be retained
ICR, so this section does not apply. time allowed by this notice, you should
until the claim or complaint has been
advise the contact listed below as soon
Peter Tsirigotis,
satisfied or barred by statute limiting the
as possible.
time for filing suits upon such claims.
Director, Sector Policies and Programs ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to Section 80.409(d), Ship
Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Cathy Williams, FCC, via email PRA@ Radiotelegraph Logs: Logs of ship
Standards. fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. stations which are compulsorily
[FR Doc. 2016–21507 Filed 9–7–16; 8:45 am] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For equipped for radiotelegraphy and
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P additional information about the operating in the band 90 to 535 kHz
information collection, contact Cathy must contain specific information in log
Williams at (202) 418–2918. entries according to this subsection.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 80.409(e), Ship
OMB Control No.: 3060–0360. Radiotelephone Logs: Logs of ship
Title: Section 80.409, Station Logs stations which are compulsorily
(Maritime Services). equipped for radiotelephony must
VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:34 Sep 07, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08SEN1.SGM 08SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_62299/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-09 13:12:50
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 13:12:50
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice. | |
| Dates | Comments must be submitted on or before November 7, 2016. | |
| Contact | John Bradfield, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (E143- 03), Environmental Protection Agency, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number: (919) 541-3062; fax | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 62125 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR