81 FR 62474 - Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 175 (September 9, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 175 (September 9, 2016)
| Page Range | 62474-62476 | |
| FR Document | 2016-21782 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 175 (Friday, September 9, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 62474-62476] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-21782] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-929] Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014- 2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On March 9, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on small diameter graphite electrodes (SDGEs) from the People's Republic of China (the PRC). The period of review (POR) is February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015. For the final results, we find that certain companies sold subject merchandise at less than normal value. DATES: Effective September 9, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dmitry Vladimirov or Michael A. Romani, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0665 or (202) 482-0198, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On March 9, 2016, the Department published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on SDGEs from the PRC.\1\ We received case and rebuttal briefs with respect to the Preliminary Results. On June 7, 2016, the Department extended the deadline for the final results by 60 days to September 6, 2016.\2\ The Department conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission of Review In Part; 2014-2015, 81 FR 12468 (March 9, 2016) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. \2\ See Memorandum from Dmitry Vladimirov, International Trade Compliance Analyst, Office I, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations to Deputy Assistant Secretary Christian Marsh entitled, ``Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated June 7, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order includes all small diameter graphite electrodes with a nominal or actual [[Page 62475]] diameter of 400 millimeters (16 inches) or less and graphite pin joining systems for small diameter graphite electrodes. Small diameter graphite electrodes and graphite pin joining systems for small diameter graphite electrodes that are subject to the order are currently classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheadings 8545.11.0010, 3801.10, and 8545.11.0020. While the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ See Memorandum from Deputy Assistant Secretary Christian Marsh to Assistant Secretary Paul Piquado entitled, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes from the People's Republic of China; 2014-2015,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum), at 2-3. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised is attached to this notice as Appendix I. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and to all parties in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of comments received, we made revisions, including the valuation of certain factors of production, which changed the results for one individually examined company, the Fangda Group,\4\ but did not change the results for the other individually examined company, Fushun Jinly Petrochemical Co., Ltd. (Fushun Jinly). For further details on the changes we made for these final results, see the company-specific analysis memoranda, the Issues and Decision Memorandum, and the final surrogate value memorandum, dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ We refer to the Fangda Group as a single entity pursuant to 19 CFR 351.401(f)(1). See Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, and Affirmative Preliminary Determination of Critical Circumstances, in Part, 73 FR 49408, 49411-12 (August 21, 2008) (where we collapsed the individual members of the Fangda Group: Beijing Fangda Carbon Tech Co., Ltd., Chengdu Rongguang Carbon Co., Ltd., Fangda Carbon New Material Co., Ltd., Fushun Carbon Co., Ltd., and Hefei Carbon Co., Ltd.), unchanged in Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances: Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes from the People's Republic of China, 74 FR 2049 (January 14, 2009). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rate for Non-Examined Separate Rate Respondent In these final results of the review, we calculated a zero or de minimis weighted-average dumping margin for Fushun Jinly, and a weighted-average dumping margin above de minimis for the Fangda Group. Accordingly, we used the weighted-average dumping margin calculated for the Fangda Group, which is 11.49 percent, as the rate for Xuzhou Jianglong Carbon Products Co., Ltd. (Xuzhou Jianglong), a company that was not individually examined and is eligible for a separate rate.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 3-4 for a full discussion. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of the Review As a result of this administrative review, we determine that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period February 1, 2014, through January 31, 2015: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Margin Company (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Fangda Group............................................... 11.49 Fushun Jinly Petrochemical Carbon Co., Ltd................. 0.00 Xuzhou Jianglong Carbon Products Co., Ltd.................. 11.49 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this proceeding within five days after public announcement of the final results, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rates Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. For entries of subject merchandise during the period of review produced by Fushun Jinly, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties because Fushun Jinly's weighted-average dumping margin in these final results is de minimis.\6\ For customers or importers of the the Fangda Group for which we do not have entered values, we will calculate customer- (or importer-) specific per unit duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the customer's (or importer's) examined sales of subject merchandise to the total sales quantity associated with those sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). For certain customers or importers of the Fangda Group for which we received entered-value information, we will calculate an antidumping duty assessment rate based on customer-/ importer-specific ad valorem rate in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). For Xuzhou Jianglong, the assessment rate is equal to the weighted average dumping margin calculated for the Fangda Group, or 11.49 percent. For entries that were not reported in the U.S. sales databases submitted by companies individually examined during this review, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate such entries at the PRC-wide rate of 159.64 percent.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Duty Proceedings; Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). \7\ See Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances: Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes from the People's Republic of China, 74 FR 2049, 2054-55. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- We intend to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results of review. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this administrative review for all shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) No cash deposit will be required for subject merchandise exported by Fushun Jinly; (2) for subject merchandise exported by the Fangda Group and Xuzhou Jianglong, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established in these final results of review for each exporter as listed above; (3) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate; (4) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found [[Page 62476]] to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity, which is 159.64 percent; (5) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of the antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. These final results of review are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: September 2, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Separate Rates V. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Eligibility for Separate Rate (Fangda Group and Xuzhou Jianglong) Comment 2: Whether Xuzhou Jianglong's Sale is Bona Fide Comment 3: Consumption of Needle Coke (Fangda Group and Fushin Jinly) Comment 4: Whether U.S. Sales are Bona Fide (Fangda Group and Fushin Jinly) Comment 5: Universe of Sales (Fangda Group) Comment 6: Reporting of Forming Scrap (Fangda Group) Comment 7: Claim for Silicon Carbide By-Product Offset (Fushin Jinly) Comment 8: Valuation of Certain By-Products/Scrap Items (Fangda Group and Fushin Jinly) Comment 9: Date of Sale (Fangda Group and Fushin Jinly) Comment 10: Tolling Data (Fangda Group) Comment 11: VAT Adjustment Calculation (Fangda Group) VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-21782 Filed 9-8-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![62474 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 175 / Friday, September 9, 2016 / Notices
made, parties will be notified of the rate, the cash deposit rate will be that DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
time and date for the hearing to be held established in the final results of this
at the U.S. Department of Commerce, review (except, if the rate is zero or de International Trade Administration
14th Street and Constitution Avenue minimis, then zero cash deposit will be [A–570–929]
NW., Washington, DC 20230.22 required); (2) for previously investigated
The Department intends to issue the or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes
final results of this administrative not listed that received a separate rate From the People’s Republic of China:
review, which will include the results of in a prior segment of this proceeding, Final Results of Antidumping Duty
our analysis of any issues raised in case the cash deposit rate will continue to be Administrative Review; 2014–2015
briefs, within 120 days of publication of the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for
these preliminary results in the Federal AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
all PRC exporters of subject International Trade Administration,
Register, unless extended, pursuant to
merchandise that have not been found Department of Commerce.
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash SUMMARY: On March 9, 2016, the
1930, as amended (‘‘the Act’’).
deposit rate will be that for the PRC- Department of Commerce (the
Assessment Rates wide entity; and (4) for all non-PRC Department) published the preliminary
Upon issuance of the final results, the exporters of subject merchandise which results of the administrative review of
Department will determine, and CBP have not received their own rate, the the antidumping duty order on small
shall assess, antidumping duties on all cash deposit rate will be the rate diameter graphite electrodes (SDGEs)
appropriate entries covered by this applicable to the PRC exporter that from the People’s Republic of China (the
review.23 The Department intends to supplied that non-PRC exporter. These PRC). The period of review (POR) is
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 deposit requirements, when imposed, February 1, 2014, through January 31,
days after the publication date of the shall remain in effect until further 2015. For the final results, we find that
final results of this review. We intend to notice. certain companies sold subject
instruct CBP to liquidate entries merchandise at less than normal value.
containing subject merchandise Notification to Importers DATES: Effective September 9, 2016.
exported by the PRC-wide entity at the This notice also serves as a FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
current rate for the PRC-wide entity (i.e., preliminary reminder to importers of Dmitry Vladimirov or Michael A.
236 percent). their responsibility under 19 CFR Romani, AD/CVD Operations, Office I,
The Department announced a Enforcement and Compliance,
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
refinement to its assessment practice in International Trade Administration,
NME cases. Pursuant to this refinement regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
in practice, for entries that were not Constitution Avenue NW., Washington
reported in the U.S. sales data submitted of the relevant entries during the POR.
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0665 or
by companies individually examined Failure to comply with this requirement
(202) 482–0198, respectively.
during the administrative review, the could result in the Department’s
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Department will instruct CBP to presumption that reimbursement of
liquidate such entries for the PRC-wide antidumping duties occurred and the Background
entity. Additionally, if the Department subsequent assessment of double On March 9, 2016, the Department
determines that an exporter had no antidumping duties. published the preliminary results of the
shipments of the subject merchandise, These preliminary results are being administrative review of the
any suspended entries that entered issued and published in accordance antidumping duty order on SDGEs from
under that exporter’s case number (i.e., with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the PRC.1 We received case and rebuttal
at that exporter’s cash deposit rate) will the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). briefs with respect to the Preliminary
be liquidated at the rate for the PRC- Results. On June 7, 2016, the
wide entity.24 The final results of this Dated: September 1, 2016.
Department extended the deadline for
review shall be the basis for the Paul Piquado, the final results by 60 days to September
assessment of antidumping duties on Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 6, 2016.2 The Department conducted
entries of merchandise covered by the Compliance. this administrative review in
final results of this review and for future accordance with section 751 of the
cash deposits of estimated duties, where Appendix I
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
applicable. List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum Scope of the Order
Cash Deposit Requirements
1. Summary The merchandise covered by the order
The following cash deposit 2. Case History includes all small diameter graphite
requirements will be effective upon 3. Scope of the Order electrodes with a nominal or actual
publication of the final results of this 4. Discussion of the Methodology
review for shipments of the subject a. Non-Market Economy Status
1 See Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes from
merchandise from the PRC entered, or the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results
b. Companies That Did Not Establish Their of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
withdrawn from warehouse, for Eligibility for a Separate Rate Rescission of Review In Part; 2014–2015, 81 FR
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
consumption on or after the publication c. Preliminary Determination of No 12468 (March 9, 2016) (Preliminary Results), and
date, as provided by sections Shipments accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For any d. Preliminary Partial Rescission of Review
2 See Memorandum from Dmitry Vladimirov,
companies listed that have a separate International Trade Compliance Analyst, Office I,
5. Recommendation Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations
[FR Doc. 2016–21767 Filed 9–8–16; 8:45 am] to Deputy Assistant Secretary Christian Marsh
22 See 19 CFR 351.310(d). entitled, ‘‘Small Diameter Graphite Electrodes from
23 See 19 CFR 351.212(b). BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
the People’s Republic of China: Extension of
24 For a full discussion of this practice, see NME Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Assessment Policy. Administrative Review,’’ dated June 7, 2016.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:11 Sep 08, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM 09SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_62649/page/1.svg)
![62476 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 175 / Friday, September 9, 2016 / Notices
to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash Comment 6: Reporting of Forming Scrap 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. (room to be
deposit rate will be that for the PRC- (Fangda Group) determined). The Halibut Management
wide entity, which is 159.64 percent; (5) Comment 7: Claim for Silicon Carbide By- Committee will meet on Tuesday,
for all non-PRC exporters of subject Product Offset (Fushin Jinly) October 4, 2016, from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.
Comment 8: Valuation of Certain By-
merchandise which have not received Products/Scrap Items (Fangda Group and
(room to be determined). The
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will Fushin Jinly) Enforcement Committee will meet on
be the rate applicable to the PRC Comment 9: Date of Sale (Fangda Group Tuesday, October 4, 2016, from 1 p.m.
exporter that supplied that non-PRC and Fushin Jinly) to 4 p.m. (room to be determined).
exporter. These deposit requirements, Comment 10: Tolling Data (Fangda Group)
Comment 11: VAT Adjustment Calculation
Agenda
when imposed, shall remain in effect
until further notice. (Fangda Group) Monday, October 3, 2016 Through
VI. Recommendation Tuesday, October 11, 2016
Notification to Importers [FR Doc. 2016–21782 Filed 9–8–16; 8:45 am]
Council Plenary Session: The agenda
This notice serves as a final reminder BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
for the Council’s plenary session will
to importers of their responsibility include the following issues. The
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a Council may take appropriate action on
certificate regarding the reimbursement DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
any of the issues identified.
of antidumping duties prior to
National Oceanic and Atmospheric (1) Executive Director’s Report
liquidation of the relevant entries
Administration (including ROA, allocation policy
during this POR. Failure to comply with
directive, legislative update; 40th
this requirement could result in the RIN 0648–XE872
Anniversary celebration update)
Secretary’s presumption that (2) NMFS Management Report
reimbursement of the antidumping North Pacific Fishery Management
(3) ADF&G Report
duties occurred and the subsequent Council; Public Meetings
(4) U.S. CG Report
assessment of double antidumping AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries (5) U.S. FWS Report
duties. Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and (6) Protected Species Report
Notification Regarding Administrative Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), (7) BSAI Crab Harvest Specifications for
Protective Order Commerce. 6 Stocks
(8) Groundfish Harvest Specifications;
ACTION: Notice of public meetings of the
This notice also serves as a reminder Stock Structure Report; Chinook
to parties subject to administrative North Pacific Fishery Management
Salmon 3-River Index
protective order (APO) of their Council and its advisory committees.
(9) Electronic Monitoring Integration
responsibility concerning the SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery (10) 2017 Observer Program Annual
disposition of proprietary information Management Council (Council) and its Deployment Plan
disclosed under APO in accordance advisory committees will meet October (11) Observer Lead Level 2
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 3, 2016 through October 11, 2016, in (12) Halibut/Sablefish IFQ Program
written notification of the return or Anchorage, AK. (13) Area 4 Halibut IFQ Leasing
destruction of APO materials or (14) BSAI Halibut Abundance-Based
DATES: The meetings will be held PSC
conversion to judicial protective order is
October 3, 2016 through October 11, (15) Halibut DMR’s Methodology
hereby requested. Failure to comply
2016. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION (16) EFH Descriptions
with the regulations and terms of an
for specific dates and times. (17) EFH Non-Fishing Effects
APO is a sanctionable violation.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at (18) EFH Fishing Effects Methods/
These final results of review are
issued and published in accordance the Anchorage Hilton Hotel, 500 W. 3rd Criteria
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Ave., Anchorage, AK 99501. (19) Staff Tasking
Act. Council address: North Pacific The Advisory Panel will address most
Fishery Management Council, 605 W. of the same agenda issues as the Council
Dated: September 2, 2016. 4th Ave., Suite 306, Anchorage, AK except B reports.
Paul Piquado, 99501–2252; telephone: (907) 271–2809. The SSC agenda will include the
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: following issues:
Compliance. David Witherell, Council staff; (1) BSAI Crab Harvest Specifications for
Appendix I telephone: (907) 271–2809. 6 Stocks
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The (2) Groundfish Harvest Specifications;
Decision Memorandum Council will begin its plenary session at Stock Structure Report; 3-River
I. Summary
8 a.m. in the Aleutian Room on Index
II. Background Wednesday, October 5 continuing (3) Electronic Monitoring Integration
III. Scope of the Order through Tuesday, October 11, 2016. The (4) 2017 Observer Program Annual
IV. Separate Rates Scientific and Statistical Committee Deployment Plan
V. Discussion of the Issues (SSC) will begin at 8 a.m. in the King (5) BSAI Halibut Abundance-Based PSC
Comment 1: Eligibility for Separate Rate Salmon/Iliamna Room on Monday, (6) Halibut/Sablefish IFQ Program
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(Fangda Group and Xuzhou Jianglong) October 3 and continue through (7) Area 4 Halibut IFQ Leasing
Comment 2: Whether Xuzhou Jianglong’s Thursday, October 6, 2016. The (8) Halibut DMR’s Methodology
Sale is Bona Fide Council’s Advisory Panel (AP) will (9) EFH Descriptions
Comment 3: Consumption of Needle Coke (10) EFH Non-Fishing Effects
(Fangda Group and Fushin Jinly)
begin at 8 a.m. in the Dillingham/
Katmai Room on Tuesday, October 4 (11) EFH Fishing Effects Methods/
Comment 4: Whether U.S. Sales are Bona Criteria
Fide (Fangda Group and Fushin Jinly) and continue through Saturday, October
Comment 5: Universe of Sales (Fangda 8, 2016. The Ecosystem Committee will In addition to providing ongoing
Group) meet on Tuesday, October 4, 2016, from scientific advice for fishery management
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:11 Sep 08, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM 09SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_62649/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-09 13:14:57
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 13:14:57
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective September 9, 2016. | |
| Contact | Dmitry Vladimirov or Michael A. Romani, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0665 or (202) 482-0198, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 62474 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR