81 FR 63102 - Air Plan Approval; VT; Prevention of Significant Deterioration, PM2.5
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 178 (September 14, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 178 (September 14, 2016)
| Page Range | 63102-63104 | |
| FR Document | 2016-21881 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 178 (Wednesday, September 14, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 63102-63104] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-21881] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R01-OAR-2016-0441; A-1-FRL-9952-11-Region I] Air Plan Approval; VT; Prevention of Significant Deterioration, PM2.5 AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Vermont. The revision sets the amount of PM2.5 increment sources are permitted to consume when obtaining a prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) preconstruction permit and requires PM2.5 emission offsets under certain circumstances. This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. DATES: This direct final rule will be effective November 14, 2016, unless EPA receives adverse comments by October 14, 2016. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01- OAR-2016-0441 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to [email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ida E. McDonnell, Manager, Air Permits, Toxics, and Indoor Programs Unit, Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100, (OEP05-2), Boston, MA 02109-3912, phone number (617) 918-1653, fax number (617) 918-0653, email [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' ``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. Organization of this document. The following outline is provided to aid in locating information in this preamble. I. Background and Purpose II. Summary of State Submittal III. Final Action IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Background and Purpose On October 20, 2010, EPA issued the final rule on the ``Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) for Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Micrometers (PM2.5 )--Increments, Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and Significant Monitoring Concentration (SMC)'' (2010 PSD Rule). See 75 FR 64864. This rule established several components for making PSD permitting determinations for PM2.5, including a system of ``increments,'' which is the mechanism used to estimate significant deterioration of ambient air quality for a pollutant. These increments are codified in 40 CFR 51.166(c) and 40 CFR 52.21(c). II. Summary of State Submittal On July 25, 2014, the VT DEC submitted a revision to its state implementation plan (SIP) primarily addressing permitting requirements for PM2.5 emissions. In a letter dated July 13, 2016, VT DEC withdrew some, but not all, of the revisions the State requested in its 2014 SIP submittal. The State withdrew these provisions for various reasons; either because more information would be needed before certain provisions could be approved by EPA into the SIP, one provision was erroneously submitted, or Vermont intends in the near future to revise certain provisions and resubmit them to EPA. On July 20, 2016, EPA's Region I Administrator signed a direct final notice approving the remaining revisions except for revisions Vermont made to its Air Pollution Control Regulations (APCR), Table 2 (Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Increments) and Table 3 (Levels of Significant Impact). Vermont revised Table 2 by adding increments for PM2.5 as well as some minor grammatical changes. Vermont revised Table 3 by changing the table's title, removing the level of significant impact for Total Suspended Particles, and adding levels for PM2.5 . Tables 2 and 3 address different aspects of permitting. Table 2 addresses the amount of a pollutant (increment consumption) a major new or modified source may contribute to the ambient air consistent with the CAA's requirements. Table 3 addresses situations in which Vermont's regulations would require emissions offsets, even for major new or modified sources that are subject to PSD preconstruction permitting requirements. III. Final Action EPA has found the PSD increment values added to Table 2 to be consistent with 40 CFR 51.166(c) and has also found that the increment values meet the anti-back sliding requirements of Section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act. Therefore, EPA is approving revised Table 2 into the Vermont SIP. Vermont revised Table 3 by adding thresholds for PM2.5 for Class I, II, and III areas. Major new or modified sources subject to PSD permitting requirements must obtain emissions offsets if the listed thresholds would be exceeded in an area found not to be attaining the national ambient air quality standard. The thresholds in Table 3 for PM2.5 for Class II and Class III areas are consistent [[Page 63103]] with the PM2.5 thresholds in 40 CFR 51.165(b)(2), while Vermont's thresholds for Class I areas are significantly more stringent than the federal regulation. Vermont also removed from Table 3 the threshold for Total Suspended Particles because EPA's regulations no longer contain a threshold for this pollutant. EPA currently sets the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for particulate matter as PM10 and PM2.5 and no longer sets a standard for Total Suspended Particles. EPA has found both revisions to Table 3 to be consistent with 40 CFR 51.165(b)(2) and Section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act. Therefore, EPA is approving revised Table 3 into the Vermont SIP. The EPA is publishing this action without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should relevant adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective November 14, 2016 without further notice unless the Agency receives relevant adverse comments by October 14, 2016. If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a notice withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on the proposed rule. All parties interested in commenting on the proposed rule should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this rule will be effective on November 14, 2016 and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. IV. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of Vermont's Air Pollution Control Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available electronically through http://www.regulations.gov. V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 14, 2016. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. [[Page 63104]] Dated: August 8, 2016. H. Curtis Spalding, Regional Administrator, EPA New England. Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart UU--Vermont 0 2. In Sec. 52.2370(c), the table ``EPA Approved Vermont Regulations'' is amended by revising the state citation entries for Table 2 and Table 3 to read as follows: Sec. 52.2370 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) * * * EPA-Approved Vermont Regulations ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State State citation Title/subject effective date EPA approval date Explanations ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * * * * * * Table 2.......................... Table 2--PSD 7/5/2014 9/14/2016, [Insert Added increment increments. Federal Register thresholds for citation]. PM2.5. Table 3.......................... Table 3--Levels of 7/5/2014 9/14/2016, [Insert Added levels for significant impact. Federal Register PM2.5. citation]. * * * * * * * ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [FR Doc. 2016-21881 Filed 9-13-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![63102 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Register. Free Internet access to the online instructions for submitting a pollutant. These increments are
official edition of the Federal Register comments. Once submitted, comments codified in 40 CFR 51.166(c) and 40
and the Code of Federal Regulations is cannot be edited or removed from CFR 52.21(c).
available via the Federal Digital System Regulations.gov. For either manner of
II. Summary of State Submittal
at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you submission, the EPA may publish any
can view this document, as well as all comment received to its public docket. On July 25, 2014, the VT DEC
other documents of this Department Do not submit electronically any submitted a revision to its state
published in the Federal Register, in information you consider to be implementation plan (SIP) primarily
text or Adobe Portable Document Confidential Business Information (CBI) addressing permitting requirements for
Format (PDF). To use PDF you must or other information whose disclosure is PM2.5 emissions. In a letter dated July
have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is restricted by statute. Multimedia 13, 2016, VT DEC withdrew some, but
available free at the site. submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be not all, of the revisions the State
You may also access documents of the accompanied by a written comment. requested in its 2014 SIP submittal. The
Department published in the Federal The written comment is considered the State withdrew these provisions for
Register by using the article search official comment and should include various reasons; either because more
feature at: www.federalregister.gov. discussion of all points you wish to information would be needed before
Specifically, through the advanced make. The EPA will generally not certain provisions could be approved by
search feature at this site, you can limit consider comments or comment EPA into the SIP, one provision was
your search to documents published by contents located outside of the primary erroneously submitted, or Vermont
the Department. submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or intends in the near future to revise
other file sharing system). For certain provisions and resubmit them to
Dated: September 9, 2016.
additional submission methods, please EPA. On July 20, 2016, EPA’s Region I
John B. King, Jr., Administrator signed a direct final
Secretary of Education.
contact the person identified in the ‘‘For
Further Information Contact’’ section. notice approving the remaining
[FR Doc. 2016–22104 Filed 9–13–16; 8:45 am]
For the full EPA public comment policy, revisions except for revisions Vermont
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
information about CBI or multimedia made to its Air Pollution Control
submissions, and general guidance on Regulations (APCR), Table 2 (Prevention
making effective comments, please visit of Significant Deterioration (PSD)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ Increments) and Table 3 (Levels of
AGENCY commenting-epa-dockets. Significant Impact).
Vermont revised Table 2 by adding
40 CFR Part 52 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ida increments for PM2.5 as well as some
E. McDonnell, Manager, Air Permits, minor grammatical changes. Vermont
[EPA–R01–OAR–2016–0441; A–1–FRL– Toxics, and Indoor Programs Unit,
9952–11–Region I] revised Table 3 by changing the table’s
Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. title, removing the level of significant
Environmental Protection Agency, EPA impact for Total Suspended Particles,
Air Plan Approval; VT; Prevention of
New England Regional Office, 5 Post and adding levels for PM2.5. Tables 2
Significant Deterioration, PM2.5
Office Square, Suite 100, (OEP05–2), and 3 address different aspects of
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Boston, MA 02109–3912, phone number permitting. Table 2 addresses the
Agency (EPA). (617) 918–1653, fax number (617) 918– amount of a pollutant (increment
ACTION: Direct final rule. 0653, email McDonnell.Ida@epa.gov. consumption) a major new or modified
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: source may contribute to the ambient air
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Throughout this document whenever consistent with the CAA’s requirements.
Agency (EPA) is approving a State
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean Table 3 addresses situations in which
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
EPA. Vermont’s regulations would require
submitted by the State of Vermont. The
Organization of this document. The emissions offsets, even for major new or
revision sets the amount of PM2.5
following outline is provided to aid in modified sources that are subject to PSD
increment sources are permitted to
locating information in this preamble. preconstruction permitting
consume when obtaining a prevention
I. Background and Purpose requirements.
of significant deterioration (PSD)
preconstruction permit and requires II. Summary of State Submittal III. Final Action
III. Final Action
PM2.5 emission offsets under certain EPA has found the PSD increment
IV. Incorporation by Reference
circumstances. This action is being V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews values added to Table 2 to be consistent
taken in accordance with the Clean Air with 40 CFR 51.166(c) and has also
Act. I. Background and Purpose
found that the increment values meet
DATES: This direct final rule will be On October 20, 2010, EPA issued the the anti-back sliding requirements of
effective November 14, 2016, unless final rule on the ‘‘Prevention of Section 110(l) of the Clean Air Act.
EPA receives adverse comments by Significant Deterioration (PSD) for Therefore, EPA is approving revised
October 14, 2016. If adverse comments Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Table 2 into the Vermont SIP.
are received, EPA will publish a timely Micrometers (PM2.5)—Increments, Vermont revised Table 3 by adding
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Significant Impact Levels (SILs) and thresholds for PM2.5 for Class I, II, and
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register informing the public Significant Monitoring Concentration III areas. Major new or modified sources
that the rule will not take effect. (SMC)’’ (2010 PSD Rule). See 75 FR subject to PSD permitting requirements
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 64864. This rule established several must obtain emissions offsets if the
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01– components for making PSD permitting listed thresholds would be exceeded in
OAR–2016–0441 at http:// determinations for PM2.5, including a an area found not to be attaining the
www.regulations.gov, or via email to system of ‘‘increments,’’ which is the national ambient air quality standard.
McDonnell.Ida@epa.gov. For comments mechanism used to estimate significant The thresholds in Table 3 for PM2.5 for
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the deterioration of ambient air quality for Class II and Class III areas are consistent
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:49 Sep 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14SER1.SGM 14SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_63280/page/1.svg)
![63104 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 178 / Wednesday, September 14, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: August 8, 2016. PART 52—APPROVAL AND Subpart UU—Vermont
H. Curtis Spalding, PROMULGATION OF
Regional Administrator, EPA New England. IMPLEMENTATION PLANS ■ 2. In § 52.2370(c), the table ‘‘EPA
Approved Vermont Regulations’’ is
Part 52 of chapter I, title 40 of the amended by revising the state citation
Code of Federal Regulations is amended ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows: entries for Table 2 and Table 3 to read
as follows: as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
§ 52.2370 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-APPROVED VERMONT REGULATIONS
State effective
State citation Title/subject EPA approval date Explanations
date
* * * * * * *
Table 2 .................................... Table 2—PSD increments ..... 7/5/2014 9/14/2016, [Insert Federal Added increment thresholds
Register citation]. for PM2.5.
Table 3 .................................... Table 3—Levels of significant 7/5/2014 9/14/2016, [Insert Federal Added levels for PM2.5.
impact. Register citation].
* * * * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016–21881 Filed 9–13–16; 8:45 am] information is not publicly available, maintenance plan for the Lamar area to
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P e.g., CBI or other information whose the EPA. On June 1, 2016, the EPA
disclosure is restricted by statute. published a proposed rulemaking in
Certain other material, such as which we proposed to approve the 10-
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION copyrighted material, is not placed on year update because it demonstrates
AGENCY the Internet and will be publicly continued maintenance of the PM10
available only in hard copy form. NAAQS through 2025.
40 CFR Part 52 Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through II. Response to Comments
[EPA–R08–OAR–2015–0042; FRL–9952–09–
Region 8] http://www.regulations.gov or in hard We received one comment letter
copy at the Air Program, Environmental during the public comment period,
Approval and Promulgation of Air Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, which was submitted anonymously.
Quality Implementation Plans; State of 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado Comment: Given the high number of
Colorado; Second Ten-Year PM10 80202–1129. The EPA requests that if at high wind occurrences, and given the
Maintenance Plan for Lamar all possible, you contact the individual consistently windy nature of the Lamar
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION area, the EPA cannot rely on the
AGENCY: Environmental Protection CONTACT section to view the hard copy
Agency (EPA). Exceptional Events Rule (EER) to ignore
of the docket. You may view the hard PM10 exceedances. In doing so, the EPA
ACTION: Final rule. copy of the docket Monday through is failing to provide environmental
Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding justice for people in rural areas, by
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
federal holidays. failing to provide them with clean air.
Agency (EPA) is approving State
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Response: 55 exceedances between
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of Colorado. On James Hou, Air Program, U.S. two monitors over the course of 14 years
May 13, 2013, the Governor of Environmental Protection Agency, were reported by the City of Lamar. The
Colorado’s designee submitted to the Region 8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 EPA notes that high wind events do not
EPA a revised maintenance plan for the Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado have to be rare to be considered an
Lamar area for the National Ambient Air 80202–1129, (303) 312–6210, exceptional event. Quoting from the
hou.james@epa.gov. ‘‘Interim Guidance on the Preparation of
Quality Standards (NAAQS) for
particulate matter with an aerodynamic SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Demonstrations in Support of Requests
diameter less than or equal to 10 I. Background to Exclude Ambient Air Quality Data
microns (PM10). The EPA is approving Affected by High Winds Under the
The Lamar area was designated
the revised maintenance plan with the Exceptional Events Rule,’’ U.S. EPA
nonattainment for PM10 and classified
exception of one aspect of the plan’s May 2013 page 20, it states,
as moderate by operation of law upon
contingency measures. enactment of the Clean Air Act (CAA) The EPA will use a weight-of-evidence
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
DATES: This final rule is effective on Amendments of 1990. See 56 FR 56694, approach to assess each demonstration and
October 14, 2016. 56705, 56736 (November 6, 1991). EPA comparison of the concentrations during
event(s) in question with historical
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a approved Colorado’s nonattainment area concentration data on a case-by-case basis.
docket for this action under Docket ID SIP for the Lamar PM10 nonattainment The EPA acknowledges that natural events,
No. EPA–R08–OAR–2015–0042. All area on June 9, 1994 (59 FR 29732). such as high wind dust events, can recur and
documents in the docket are listed on On May 13, 2013, the Governor of still be eligible for exclusion under the EER.
the http://www.regulations.gov Web Colorado’s designee submitted the Therefore, events do not necessarily have to
site. Although listed in the index, some second 10-year update of the PM10 be rare to satisfy this element.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:49 Sep 13, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\14SER1.SGM 14SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_63280/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-09-14 02:27:34
Document Modified: 2016-09-14 02:27:34
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This direct final rule will be effective November 14, 2016, unless EPA receives adverse comments by October 14, 2016. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Ida E. McDonnell, Manager, Air Permits, Toxics, and Indoor Programs Unit, Office of Ecosystem Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100, (OEP05-2), Boston, MA 02109-3912, phone number (617) 918-1653, fax number (617) 918-0653, email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 63102 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Particulate Matter and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR