81 FR 64068 - Security Zone; 22nd International Seapower Symposium Special Events, Rosecliff Mansion and Newport Marriott Hotel, Newport, RI

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 181 (September 19, 2016)

Page Range		64068-64070
FR Document		2016-22463

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary 500-yard security zone on the waters adjacent to Rosecliff Mansion and the Newport Marriott Hotel, in Newport, Rhode Island, in conjunction with special events of the U.S. Navy's 22nd International Seapower Symposium. Vessels and people are prohibited from entering these security zones.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 181 (Monday, September 19, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 181 (Monday, September 19, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64068-64070]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22463]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[USCG-2016-0813]
RIN 1625-AA87


Security Zone; 22nd International Seapower Symposium Special 
Events, Rosecliff Mansion and Newport Marriott Hotel, Newport, RI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary 500-yard security 
zone on the waters adjacent to Rosecliff Mansion and the Newport 
Marriott Hotel, in Newport, Rhode Island, in conjunction with special 
events of the U.S. Navy's 22nd International Seapower Symposium. 
Vessels and people are prohibited from entering these security zones.

DATES: This rule is effective from 4 p.m. on September 20, 2016 through 
11:30 p.m. on September 22, 2016.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0813 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this 
temporary rule, call or email Mr. Edward G. LeBlanc at Sector 
Southeastern New England, telephone (401) 435-2351, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Acronyms

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
TFR Temporary Final Rule
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior 
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.''
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause 
exists for not publishing a NPRM with respect to this rule. Because of 
the sensitive security issues related to these special events, the 
Coast Guard was not aware of the final details with sufficient time to 
solicit public comments. Thus, waiting for a full comment period to run 
would inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to keep senior military leaders 
and government officials, along with the general public, safe from 
subversive acts directed at these high visibility special events. 
Providing a prolonged public notice and comment period is contrary

[[Page 64069]]

to the public interest due to national security concerns.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less 
than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. For the same 
reasons discussed in the preceding paragraph, delaying the effective 
date of this rule would be contrary to the public interest.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The legal authority for this rule is 33 U.S.C. 1231 which 
authorizes the Coast Guard to define Security Zones.
    The 22nd International Seapower Symposium is being held on Goat 
Island, Newport, RI, from September 18 to September 23, 2016. High 
level U.S. officials and delegates from over 125 countries are expected 
to attend. As part of the Symposium, special events are being held on 
the evenings of Tuesday, September 20 and Thursday, September 22, 2016, 
at Rosecliff Mansion and the Newport Marriott Hotel, respectively, 
which are waterfront properties in Newport, Rhode Island, and within 
the COTP, Southeastern New England zone. The COTP has determined that 
it is necessary to temporarily prohibit vessel traffic from transiting 
within 500 yards of Rosecliff Mansion (approximate position 41[deg]-
27'54'' N., 071[deg]-18'18'' W.) and the Newport Marriott Hotel 
(approximate position 41[deg]-29'23'' N., 071[deg]-19'04'' W.), 
Newport, RI, to safeguard the symposium attendees against potential 
sabotage, subversive acts, or other threats.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    For the reasons discussed above, this rule establishes temporary 
500-yard security zones in the navigable waters adjacent to Rosecliff 
Mansion (approximate position 41[deg]-27'54'' N., 071[deg]-18'18'' W.) 
and the Newport Marriott Hotel (approximate position 41[deg]-29'23'' 
N., 071[deg]-19'04'' W.) respectively, in Newport, Rhode Island. These 
security zones will be effective and enforced at Rosecliff Mansion and 
the Newport Marriott Hotel from 4 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. on Tuesday, 
September 20 and Thursday, September 22, 2016, respectively. Vessels 
and persons will be prohibited from entering these security zones 
during this time.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on these statutes and executive orders, and we discuss First 
Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, the rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management 
and Budget.
    The Coast Guard expects the economic impact of this rule to be 
minimal, such that a full regulatory evaluation under the regulatory 
policies and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. The effect of this rule 
will be small, as the duration of the security zones is for only seven 
and a half hours on two separate evenings. Additionally, vessels may be 
permitted to transit and navigate in waters adjacent to this security 
zones, minimizing any adverse impact. Maritime advisories will be 
broadcasted.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
security zones may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above this rule would not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have 
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see 
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what 
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions

[[Page 64070]]

that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal 
government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 
(adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule does 
not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this 
rule elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves the establishment of temporary security zones for special 
events being held in conjunction with the 22nd International Seapower 
Symposium. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from 
further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of Commandant 
Instruction M16475.lD. An environmental analysis checklist and 
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where 
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may 
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this 
rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reports and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add temporary Sec.  165.T01-0813 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T01-0813  Security Zones: Rosecliff Mansion and Newport 
Marriott Hotel, Newport, Rhode Island.

    (a) Location. The following areas are security zones: All navigable 
waters, from surface to bottom, within 500 yards of Rosecliff Mansion 
(approximate position 41[deg]-27'54'' N., 071[deg]-18'18'' W.) and the 
Newport Marriott Hotel (approximate position 41[deg]-29'23'' N., 
071[deg]-19'04'' W.), Newport, Rhode Island.
    (b) Effective and enforcement period. This rule will be effective 
and enforced from 4 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. on Tuesday, September 20, 2016 
at Rosecliff Mansion, and from 4 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. on Thursday, 
September 22, 2016, at the Newport Marriott Hotel.
    (c) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section: 
``Designated on-scene patrol personnel'' means any commissioned, 
warrant and petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard operating Coast 
Guard vessels who have been authorized to act on the behalf of the 
Captain of the Port, Southeastern New England.
    (d) Regulations. (1) The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 
165.30 and 165.33 apply.
    (2) In accordance with the general regulations in 33 CFR 165.33 of 
this part, entry into or movement within these zones is prohibited 
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Southeastern New England.
    (3) Any vessel permitted to enter these security zones shall comply 
with the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or designated on-scene patrol 
personnel.
    (4) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio, 
flashing light or other means, the operator of the vessel shall proceed 
as directed.
    (5) Persons and vessels may request permission to enter the zone on 
VHF-16.

    Dated: August 31, 2016.
J.A. Smith,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, Southeastern 
New England.
[FR Doc. 2016-22463 Filed 9-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 64069

to the public interest due to national A. Regulatory Planning and Review would affect your small business,
security concerns. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 organization, or governmental
We are issuing this rule, and under 5 jurisdiction and you have questions
direct agencies to assess the costs and
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds concerning its provisions or options for
benefits of available regulatory
that good cause exists for making this compliance, please contact the person
alternatives and, if regulation is
rule effective less than 30 days after listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
necessary, to select regulatory
publication in the Federal Register. For CONTACT section.
approaches that maximize net benefits.
the same reasons discussed in the Small businesses may send comments
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
preceding paragraph, delaying the on the actions of Federal employees
importance of quantifying both costs
effective date of this rule would be who enforce, or otherwise determine
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
contrary to the public interest. compliance with, Federal regulations to
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
the Small Business and Agriculture
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule flexibility. This rule has not been
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
The legal authority for this rule is 33 designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
and the Regional Small Business
U.S.C. 1231 which authorizes the Coast action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Guard to define Security Zones. Accordingly, the rule has not been
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
The 22nd International Seapower reviewed by the Office of Management
annually and rates each agency’s
Symposium is being held on Goat and Budget.
responsiveness to small business. If you
Island, Newport, RI, from September 18 The Coast Guard expects the
wish to comment on actions by
to September 23, 2016. High level U.S. economic impact of this rule to be
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
officials and delegates from over 125 minimal, such that a full regulatory
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
countries are expected to attend. As part evaluation under the regulatory policies
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
of the Symposium, special events are and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
small entities that question or complain
being held on the evenings of Tuesday, The effect of this rule will be small, as
about this rule or any policy or action
September 20 and Thursday, September the duration of the security zones is for
of the Coast Guard.
22, 2016, at Rosecliff Mansion and the only seven and a half hours on two
Newport Marriott Hotel, respectively, separate evenings. Additionally, vessels C. Collection of Information
which are waterfront properties in may be permitted to transit and navigate This rule calls for no new collection
Newport, Rhode Island, and within the in waters adjacent to this security zones, of information under the Paperwork
COTP, Southeastern New England zone. minimizing any adverse impact. Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
The COTP has determined that it is Maritime advisories will be broadcasted. 3520).
necessary to temporarily prohibit vessel B. Impact on Small Entities
traffic from transiting within 500 yards D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
of Rosecliff Mansion (approximate The Regulatory Flexibility Act of Governments
position 41°-27′54″ N., 071°-18′18″ W.) 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, A rule has implications for federalism
and the Newport Marriott Hotel requires Federal agencies to consider under Executive Order 13132,
(approximate position 41°-29′23″ N., the potential impact of regulations on Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
071°-19′04″ W.), Newport, RI, to small entities during rulemaking. The effect on the States, on the relationship
safeguard the symposium attendees term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small between the national government and
against potential sabotage, subversive businesses, not-for-profit organizations the States, or on the distribution of
acts, or other threats. that are independently owned and power and responsibilities among the
operated and are not dominant in their various levels of government. We have
IV. Discussion of the Rule fields, and governmental jurisdictions analyzed this rule under that Order and
For the reasons discussed above, this with populations of less than 50,000. have determined that it is consistent
rule establishes temporary 500-yard The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. with the fundamental federalism
security zones in the navigable waters 605(b) that this rule would not have a principles and preemption requirements
adjacent to Rosecliff Mansion significant economic impact on a described in Executive Order 13132.
(approximate position 41°-27′54″ N., substantial number of small entities. Also, this rule does not have tribal
071°-18′18″ W.) and the Newport While some owners or operators of implications under Executive Order
Marriott Hotel (approximate position vessels intending to transit the security 13175, Consultation and Coordination
41°-29′23″ N., 071°-19′04″ W.) zones may be small entities, for the with Indian Tribal Governments,
respectively, in Newport, Rhode Island. reasons stated in section V.A above this because it would not have a substantial
These security zones will be effective rule would not have a significant direct effect on one or more Indian
and enforced at Rosecliff Mansion and economic impact on any vessel owner tribes, on the relationship between the
the Newport Marriott Hotel from 4 p.m. or operator. Federal Government and Indian tribes,
to 11:30 p.m. on Tuesday, September 20 If you think that your business, or on the distribution of power and
and Thursday, September 22, 2016, organization, or governmental responsibilities between the Federal
respectively. Vessels and persons will jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity Government and Indian tribes. If you
be prohibited from entering these and that this rule would have a believe this rule has implications for
security zones during this time. significant economic impact on it, federalism or Indian tribes, please
please submit a comment (see contact the person listed in the FOR
V. Regulatory Analyses ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
We developed this rule after qualifies and how and to what degree
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES

considering numerous statutes and this rule would economically affect it. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
executive orders related to rulemaking. Under section 213(a) of the Small The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Below we summarize our analyses Business Regulatory Enforcement of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
based on these statutes and executive Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), Federal agencies to assess the effects of
orders, and we discuss First we want to assist small entities in their discretionary regulatory actions. In
Amendment rights of protestors. understanding this rule. If the rule particular, the Act addresses actions

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:11 Sep 16, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM 19SER1

64070 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

that may result in the expenditure by a ■ 2. Add temporary § 165.T01–0813 to ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
State, local, or tribal government, in the read as follows: AGENCY
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or § 165.T01–0813 Security Zones: Rosecliff 40 CFR Part 52
more in any one year. Though this rule Mansion and Newport Marriott Hotel,
Newport, Rhode Island. [EPA–R02–OAR–2016–0389; FRL–9952–41–
does not result in such an expenditure,
Region 2]
we do discuss the effects of this rule (a) Location. The following areas are
elsewhere in this preamble. security zones: All navigable waters, Partial Approval and Partial
F. Environment from surface to bottom, within 500 Disapproval of Air Quality
yards of Rosecliff Mansion (approximate Implementation Plans; NJ;
We have analyzed this rule under position 41°¥27′54″ N., 071°¥18′18″ Infrastructure SIP Requirements for
Department of Homeland Security W.) and the Newport Marriott Hotel 2008 Lead, 2008 Ozone, 2010 Nitrogen
Management Directive 023–01 and (approximate position 41°¥29′23″ N., Dioxide, 2010 Sulfur Dioxide, and 2012
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 071°¥19′04″ W.), Newport, Rhode PM2.5, 2006 PM10 and 2011 Carbon
which guide the Coast Guard in Island. Monoxide NAAQS: Interstate Transport
complying with the National Provisions
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 (b) Effective and enforcement period.
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have This rule will be effective and enforced AGENCY: Environmental Protection
determined that this action is one of a from 4 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. on Tuesday, Agency (EPA).
category of actions that do not September 20, 2016 at Rosecliff ACTION: Final rule.
individually or cumulatively have a Mansion, and from 4 p.m. to 11:30 p.m.
significant effect on the human on Thursday, September 22, 2016, at the SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
environment. This rule involves the Newport Marriott Hotel. Agency (EPA) is partially approving and
establishment of temporary security partially disapproving elements of a
(c) Definitions. The following
zones for special events being held in New Jersey State Implementation Plan
definitions apply to this section: (SIP) submittal pertaining to the
conjunction with the 22nd International ‘‘Designated on-scene patrol personnel’’
Seapower Symposium. Normally such infrastructure requirements of section
means any commissioned, warrant and 110(a)(1) and (2) of the Clean Air Act
actions are categorically excluded from petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard
further review under paragraph 34(g) of (CAA) for the 2008 Lead, 2008 Ozone,
operating Coast Guard vessels who have 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), 2010
Figure 2–1 of Commandant Instruction
been authorized to act on the behalf of Sulfur Dioxide (SO2), 2011 Carbon
M16475.lD. An environmental analysis
checklist and Categorical Exclusion the Captain of the Port, Southeastern Monoxide (CO), 2006 Particulate Matter
Determination are available in the New England. of ten microns or less (PM10), and 2012
docket where indicated under (d) Regulations. (1) The general Particulate Matter of 2.5 microns or less
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.30 (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality
information that may lead to the and 165.33 apply. Standards (NAAQS). The infrastructure
discovery of a significant environmental requirements are designed to ensure that
(2) In accordance with the general the structural components of each
impact from this rule. regulations in 33 CFR 165.33 of this state’s air quality management program
G. Protest Activities part, entry into or movement within are adequate to meet the state’s
these zones is prohibited unless responsibilities under the CAA. This
The Coast Guard respects the First authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Amendment rights of protesters. action pertains specifically to
Southeastern New England. infrastructure requirements relating to
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER (3) Any vessel permitted to enter interstate transport provisions
INFORMATION CONTACT section to these security zones shall comply with concerning the Prevention of Significant
coordinate protest activities so that your the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or Deterioration of Air Quality (PSD)
message can be received without designated on-scene patrol personnel. regulations, and visibility protection.
jeopardizing the safety or security of (4) Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast DATES: This rule is effective on October
people, places or vessels. Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing 19, 2016.
light or other means, the operator of the ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
vessel shall proceed as directed. docket for this action under Docket ID
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation No. EPA–R02–OAR–2016–0389. All
(water), Reports and recordkeeping (5) Persons and vessels may request documents in the docket are listed on
requirements, Security measures, and permission to enter the zone on VHF– the http://www.regulations.gov Web
Waterways. 16. site. Although listed in the index, some
For the reasons discussed in the Dated: August 31, 2016. information is not publicly available,
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 J.A. Smith, e.g., Confidential Business Information
CFR part 165 as follows: Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting or other information whose disclosure is
Captain of the Port, Southeastern New restricted by statute. Certain other
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION England. material, such as copyrighted material,
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS [FR Doc. 2016–22463 Filed 9–16–16; 8:45 am]
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 Publicly available docket materials are
continues to read as follows: available either electronically through
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; http://www.regulations.gov or please
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; contact the person identified in the FOR
Department of Homeland Security Delegation FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
No. 0170.1. for additional information.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:11 Sep 16, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19SER1.SGM 19SER1

Document Created: 2016-09-17 02:29:38
Document Modified: 2016-09-17 02:29:38

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 4 p.m. on September 20, 2016 through 11:30 p.m. on September 22, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions on this temporary rule, call or email Mr. Edward G. LeBlanc at Sector Southeastern New England, telephone (401) 435-2351, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 64068
RIN Number		1625-AA87
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reports and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

81 FR 64068 - Security Zone; 22nd International Seapower Symposium Special Events, Rosecliff Mansion and Newport Marriott Hotel, Newport, RI

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 181 (September 19, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard