81_FR_64340 81 FR 64159 - RPG National Cross-Site Evaluation 30-Day Notice

81 FR 64159 - RPG National Cross-Site Evaluation 30-Day Notice

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 181 (September 19, 2016)

Page Range64159-64161
FR Document2016-22458

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 181 (Monday, September 19, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 181 (Monday, September 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64159-64161]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22458]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


RPG National Cross-Site Evaluation 30-Day Notice

AGENCY: Children's Bureau, Administration for Children and Families, 
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

ACTION: Proposed Information Collection Activity; Comment Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Title: RPG National Cross-Site Evaluation and Evaluation Technical 
Assistance.
    OMB No.: 0970-0444.
    Description: The Children's Bureau within the Administration for 
Children and Families of the U.S. Department of Health and Human 
Services seeks a renewal of clearance to collect information for the 
Regional Partnership Grants to Increase the Well-being of and to 
Improve Permanency Outcomes for Children Affected by Substance Abuse 
Cross-Site Evaluation and Evaluation-Related Technical Assistance and 
Data Collection Support for Regional Partnership Grant Program Round 
Three Sites or ``RPG'' projects. Under RPG, the Children's Bureau has 
issued 21 grants to organizations such as child welfare or substance 
abuse treatment providers or family court systems to develop 
interagency collaborations and integration of programs, activities, and 
services designed to increase well-being, improve permanency, and 
enhance the safety of children who are in an out-of-home placement or 
are at risk of being placed in out-of-home care as a result of a 
parent's or caretaker's substance use dependence. The Child and Family 
Services Improvement and Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-34) includes a 
targeted grants program (section 437(f) of the Social Security Act) 
that directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to reserve a 
specified portion of the appropriation for these Regional Partnership 
Grants, to be used to improve the well-being of children affected by 
substance abuse. The overall objective of the Cross-Site Evaluation and 
Technical Assistance projects (the RPG Cross-Site Evaluation) is to 
plan, develop, and implement a rigorous national cross-site evaluation 
of the RPG Grant Program, provide legislatively-mandated performance 
measurement, furnish evaluation-related technical assistance to the 
grantees in order to improve the quality and rigor of their local 
evaluations, and support their participation in the cross-site 
evaluation. The project will evaluate the programs and activities 
conducted through the RPG Program. The evaluation is being undertaken 
by the Children's Bureau and its contractor Mathematica Policy 
Research. The evaluation is being implemented by Mathematica Policy 
Research and its subcontractors, WRMA, Inc., and Synergy Enterprises.
    The RPG Cross-Site Evaluation includes the following components:

[[Page 64160]]

    1. Implementation and Partnership Study. The RPG cross-site 
implementation and partnership study will contribute to building the 
knowledge base about effective implementation strategies by examining 
the process of implementation in the 21 RPG projects, with a focus on 
factors shown in the research literature to be associated with quality 
implementation of evidence-based programs. This component of the study 
describes the RPG projects' target populations, selected interventions 
and their fit with the target populations, inputs to implementation, 
and actual services provided (including dosage, duration, content, 
adherence to curricula, and participant responsiveness). It examines 
the key attributes of the regional partnerships that grantees develop 
(for example, partnerships among child welfare and substance abuse 
treatment providers, social services, and family courts). It describes 
the characteristics and roles of the partner organizations, the extent 
of coordination and collaboration, and their potential to sustain the 
partnerships after the grant ends. Key data collection activities of 
the implementation and partnership study are: (1) Conducting site 
visits during which researchers interview RPG program directors, 
managers, supervisors, and frontline staff who work directly with 
families; (2) administering a survey to frontline staff involved in 
providing direct services to children, adults, and families; (3) asking 
grantees to provide information about implementation and their 
partnerships as part of their federally required semi-annual progress 
reports; (4) obtaining service use data from grantees, enrollment date 
and demographics of enrollees, exit date and reason, and service 
participation, which are entered into a web-based system operated by 
Mathematica Policy Research and its subcontractors; and (5) 
administering a survey to representatives of the partner organizations.
    2. Outcomes Study. The goal of the outcomes study is to describe 
the changes that occur in children and families who participate in the 
RPG programs. This study will describe participant outcomes in five 
domains: (1) Child well-being, (2) family functioning/stability, (3) 
adult recovery from substance use disorder, (4) child permanency, and 
(5) child safety. Two main types of outcome data will be used--both of 
which are being collected by RPG grantees: (1) Administrative child 
welfare and adult substance abuse treatment records and (2) 
standardized instruments administered to the parents and/or caregivers. 
The Children's Bureau is requiring grantees to obtain and report 
specified administrative records, and to use a prescribed set of 
standardized instruments. Grantees will provide these data to the 
cross-site evaluation team twice a year by uploading them to a data 
system operated by Mathematica Policy Research and its subcontractors.
    3. Impact Study. The goal of the impact study is to assess the 
impact of the RPG interventions on child, adult, and family outcomes by 
comparing outcomes for people enrolled in RPG services to those in 
comparison groups, such as people who do not receive RPG services or 
receive only a subset of the services. The impact study will use 
demographic and outcome data on both program (treatment) and comparison 
groups from a subset of grantees with appropriate local evaluation 
designs such as randomized controlled trials or strong quasi-
experimental designs; 5 of the 21 grantees have such designs. Site-
specific impacts will be estimated for these seven grantees. Aggregated 
impact estimates will be created by pooling impact estimates across 
appropriate sites to obtain a more powerful summary of the 
effectiveness of RPG interventions.
    In addition to conducting local evaluations and participating in 
the RPG Cross-Site Evaluation, the RPG grantees are legislatively 
required to report performance indicators aligned with their proposed 
program strategies and activities. A key strategy of the RPG Cross-Site 
Evaluation is to minimize burden on the grantees by ensuring that the 
cross-site evaluation, which includes all grantees in a study that 
collects data to report on implementation, the partnerships, and 
participant characteristics and outcomes, fully meets the need for 
performance reporting. Thus, rather than collecting separate evaluation 
and performance indicator data, the grantees need only participate in 
the cross-site evaluation. In addition, using the standardized 
instruments that the Children's Bureau has specified will ensure that 
grantees have valid and reliable data on child and family outcomes for 
their local evaluations. The inclusion of an impact study conducted on 
a subset of grantees with rigorous designs will also provide the 
Children's Bureau, Congress, grantees, providers, and researchers with 
information about the effectiveness of RPG programs.
    A 60-Day Federal Register Notice was published for this study on 
June 24, 2016. This 30-Day Federal Register Notice covers the following 
data collection activities: (1) The site visits with grantees; (2) the 
web-based survey of frontline staff who provide direct services to 
children, adults, and families, and their supervisors; (3) the semi-
annual progress reports; (4) enrollment and service data provided by 
grantees; (5) the web-based survey of grantee partners; and (6) outcome 
data provided by grantees.
    Respondents. Respondents include grantee staff or contractors (such 
as local evaluators) and partner staff. Specific types of respondents 
and the expected number per data collection effort are noted in the 
burden table below.
    Annual burden estimates. The following instruments are proposed for 
public comment under this 30-Day Federal Register Notice. Burden for 
all components is annualized over three years.

                              RPG Cross-Site Evaluation Annualized Burden Estimates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  Average burden
                                   Total number      Number of       hours per       Estimated     Total Annual
    Data collection activity      of respondents   responses per   response (in    Total burden    burden hours
                                                    respondent        hours)           hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Implementation and Partnership Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Program director individual                    4               1               2               8            2.67
 interview......................
Program manager/supervisor group              36               1               2              72              24
 interview......................
Program manager/supervisor                    24               1               1              24               8
 individual interviews..........
Frontline staff individual                    24               1               1              24               8
 interviews.....................
Semi-annual progress reports....              21               6            16.5           2,079             693
Case enrollment data............              63              90            0.25         1,417.5           472.5

[[Page 64161]]

 
Service log entries.............             126           2,340            0.05          14,742           4,914
Staff survey....................              80               1            0.42            33.6            11.2
Partner survey..................              80               1            0.33            26.4             8.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Data Entry for Outcomes Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Administrative Data:
    Obtain access to                          21               2              18             378             126
     administrative data........
    Report administrative data..              21               6             144          18,144           6,048
Standardized instruments:
    Enter data into local                     21               6           112.5          14,175           4,725
     database...................
    Review records and submit...              21               6             100          12,600           4,200
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     Additional Data Entry for Impact Study
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Data entry for comparison study                5               1             .25           1,085           361.6
 sites (7 grantees).............
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Total Burden Hours....  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............       21,602.77
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In compliance with the requirements of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Children's Bureau within the 
Administration for Children and Families is soliciting public comment 
on the specific aspects of the information collection described above. 
Copies of the proposed collection of information can be obtained and 
comments may be forwarded by writing to Administration for Children and 
Families, Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation, 330 C Street 
SW., Washington, DC 20416, Attn: ACF Reports Clearance Officer. Email 
address: [email protected]. All requests should be identified 
by the title of the information collection.
    OMB is required to make a decision concerning the collection of 
information between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document 
in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best assured of having 
its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication. 
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent directly to the following: Office of 
Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Email: 
[email protected], Attn: Desk Officer for the Administration 
of Children and Families.

Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-22458 Filed 9-16-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P



                                                                                    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2016 / Notices                                                                                                 64159

                                                  NIOSH information in the current                                        materials. Intermediaries use their                                             NIOSH estimates that it will take 315
                                                  digital environment.                                                    connections to small businesses and                                           total burden hours to complete
                                                    The survey will be directed to the                                    other organizations to disseminate                                            information collections, compared to
                                                  community of occupational safety and                                    information to stakeholders who might                                         204 burden hours estimated for the 2010
                                                  health (OSH) professionals as well as                                   not otherwise receive it. Intermediaries                                      CSS. There are no costs to the
                                                  business and trade association                                          include occupational health service                                           respondents other than their time.
                                                  intermediaries as this audience                                         providers, labor organizations, chambers
                                                  represents the primary and traditional                                                                                                                  Customer Satisfaction and Impact
                                                                                                                          of commerce, and insurance companies.                                         (CSI) Survey:
                                                  customer base for NIOSH information

                                                                                                                         ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Average
                                                                                                                                                                                                      Number of
                                                                                                                                                                           Number of                                              burden per              Total burden
                                                            Type of respondents                                                Form name                                                            responses per
                                                                                                                                                                          respondents                                              response                 (in hrs.)
                                                                                                                                                                                                      respondent                    (in hrs.)

                                                  AIHA members ..................................          NIOSH Customer Satisfaction                         Sur-                        150                            1                   20/60                 50
                                                                                                             vey—full version.
                                                  AIHA Members ..................................          NIOSH Customer Satisfaction                         Sur-                        150                            1                    5/60                 13
                                                                                                             vey—full version.
                                                  AAOHN Members .............................              NIOSH Customer Satisfaction                         Sur-                        150                           1                    20/60                 50
                                                                                                             vey—full version Work,.
                                                  AAOHN Members .............................              NIOSH Customer Satisfaction                         Sur-                       150                             1                     5/60                13
                                                                                                             vey—short version.
                                                  ACOEM members .............................              NIOSH Customer Satisfaction                         Sur-                        150                            1                   20/60                 50
                                                                                                             vey—full version.
                                                  ACOEM members .............................              NIOSH Customer Satisfaction                         Sur-                        150                            1                    5/60                 13
                                                                                                             vey—short version.
                                                  ASSE members ................................            NIOSH Customer Satisfaction                         Sur-                        150                           1                    20/60                 50
                                                                                                             vey—full version.
                                                  ASSE members ................................            NIOSH Customer Satisfaction                         Sur-                        150                           1                      5/60                13
                                                                                                             vey—short version.
                                                  Other members* ................................          NIOSH Customer Satisfaction                         Sur-                        150                           1                    20/60                 50
                                                                                                             vey—full version.
                                                  Other members .................................          NIOSH Customer Satisfaction                         Sur-                       150                             1                     5/60                13
                                                                                                             vey—short version.

                                                       Total ...........................................   ...........................................................   ........................   ........................   ........................            315



                                                  Leroy A. Richardson,                                                    and Families of the U.S. Department of                                        to reserve a specified portion of the
                                                  Chief, Information Collection Review Office,                            Health and Human Services seeks a                                             appropriation for these Regional
                                                  Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the                           renewal of clearance to collect                                               Partnership Grants, to be used to
                                                  Associate Director for Science, Office of the                           information for the Regional Partnership                                      improve the well-being of children
                                                  Director, Centers for Disease Control and                               Grants to Increase the Well-being of and
                                                  Prevention.
                                                                                                                                                                                                        affected by substance abuse. The overall
                                                                                                                          to Improve Permanency Outcomes for                                            objective of the Cross-Site Evaluation
                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–22447 Filed 9–16–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                          Children Affected by Substance Abuse                                          and Technical Assistance projects (the
                                                  BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
                                                                                                                          Cross-Site Evaluation and Evaluation-                                         RPG Cross-Site Evaluation) is to plan,
                                                                                                                          Related Technical Assistance and Data                                         develop, and implement a rigorous
                                                                                                                          Collection Support for Regional                                               national cross-site evaluation of the RPG
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
                                                                                                                          Partnership Grant Program Round Three                                         Grant Program, provide legislatively-
                                                  HUMAN SERVICES
                                                                                                                          Sites or ‘‘RPG’’ projects. Under RPG, the                                     mandated performance measurement,
                                                  Administration for Children and                                         Children’s Bureau has issued 21 grants                                        furnish evaluation-related technical
                                                  Families                                                                to organizations such as child welfare or                                     assistance to the grantees in order to
                                                                                                                          substance abuse treatment providers or                                        improve the quality and rigor of their
                                                  RPG National Cross-Site Evaluation                                      family court systems to develop                                               local evaluations, and support their
                                                  30-Day Notice                                                           interagency collaborations and                                                participation in the cross-site
                                                                                                                          integration of programs, activities, and
                                                  AGENCY:  Children’s Bureau,                                                                                                                           evaluation. The project will evaluate the
                                                                                                                          services designed to increase well-being,
                                                  Administration for Children and                                                                                                                       programs and activities conducted
                                                                                                                          improve permanency, and enhance the
                                                  Families, U.S. Department of Health and                                                                                                               through the RPG Program. The
                                                                                                                          safety of children who are in an out-of-
                                                  Human Services.                                                                                                                                       evaluation is being undertaken by the
                                                                                                                          home placement or are at risk of being
                                                  ACTION: Proposed Information Collection
                                                                                                                          placed in out-of-home care as a result of                                     Children’s Bureau and its contractor
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  Activity; Comment Request.                                              a parent’s or caretaker’s substance use                                       Mathematica Policy Research. The
                                                                                                                          dependence. The Child and Family                                              evaluation is being implemented by
                                                    Title: RPG National Cross-Site                                                                                                                      Mathematica Policy Research and its
                                                  Evaluation and Evaluation Technical                                     Services Improvement and Innovation
                                                                                                                          Act (Pub. L. 112–34) includes a targeted                                      subcontractors, WRMA, Inc., and
                                                  Assistance.
                                                    OMB No.: 0970–0444.                                                   grants program (section 437(f) of the                                         Synergy Enterprises.
                                                    Description: The Children’s Bureau                                    Social Security Act) that directs the                                            The RPG Cross-Site Evaluation
                                                  within the Administration for Children                                  Secretary of Health and Human Services                                        includes the following components:


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014       21:47 Sep 16, 2016        Jkt 238001       PO 00000        Frm 00034        Fmt 4703        Sfmt 4703      E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM               19SEN1


                                                  64160                           Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2016 / Notices

                                                    1. Implementation and Partnership                                changes that occur in children and                    Cross-Site Evaluation is to minimize
                                                  Study. The RPG cross-site                                          families who participate in the RPG                   burden on the grantees by ensuring that
                                                  implementation and partnership study                               programs. This study will describe                    the cross-site evaluation, which
                                                  will contribute to building the                                    participant outcomes in five domains:                 includes all grantees in a study that
                                                  knowledge base about effective                                     (1) Child well-being, (2) family                      collects data to report on
                                                  implementation strategies by examining                             functioning/stability, (3) adult recovery             implementation, the partnerships, and
                                                  the process of implementation in the 21                            from substance use disorder, (4) child                participant characteristics and
                                                  RPG projects, with a focus on factors                              permanency, and (5) child safety. Two                 outcomes, fully meets the need for
                                                  shown in the research literature to be                             main types of outcome data will be                    performance reporting. Thus, rather
                                                  associated with quality implementation                             used—both of which are being collected                than collecting separate evaluation and
                                                  of evidence-based programs. This                                   by RPG grantees: (1) Administrative                   performance indicator data, the grantees
                                                  component of the study describes the                               child welfare and adult substance abuse
                                                                                                                                                                           need only participate in the cross-site
                                                  RPG projects’ target populations,                                  treatment records and (2) standardized
                                                                                                                                                                           evaluation. In addition, using the
                                                  selected interventions and their fit with                          instruments administered to the parents
                                                  the target populations, inputs to                                  and/or caregivers. The Children’s                     standardized instruments that the
                                                  implementation, and actual services                                Bureau is requiring grantees to obtain                Children’s Bureau has specified will
                                                  provided (including dosage, duration,                              and report specified administrative                   ensure that grantees have valid and
                                                  content, adherence to curricula, and                               records, and to use a prescribed set of               reliable data on child and family
                                                  participant responsiveness). It examines                           standardized instruments. Grantees will               outcomes for their local evaluations.
                                                  the key attributes of the regional                                 provide these data to the cross-site                  The inclusion of an impact study
                                                  partnerships that grantees develop (for                            evaluation team twice a year by                       conducted on a subset of grantees with
                                                  example, partnerships among child                                  uploading them to a data system                       rigorous designs will also provide the
                                                  welfare and substance abuse treatment                              operated by Mathematica Policy                        Children’s Bureau, Congress, grantees,
                                                  providers, social services, and family                             Research and its subcontractors.                      providers, and researchers with
                                                  courts). It describes the characteristics                             3. Impact Study. The goal of the                   information about the effectiveness of
                                                  and roles of the partner organizations,                            impact study is to assess the impact of               RPG programs.
                                                  the extent of coordination and                                     the RPG interventions on child, adult,                   A 60-Day Federal Register Notice was
                                                  collaboration, and their potential to                              and family outcomes by comparing                      published for this study on June 24,
                                                  sustain the partnerships after the grant                           outcomes for people enrolled in RPG
                                                                                                                                                                           2016. This 30-Day Federal Register
                                                  ends. Key data collection activities of                            services to those in comparison groups,
                                                                                                                                                                           Notice covers the following data
                                                  the implementation and partnership                                 such as people who do not receive RPG
                                                                                                                     services or receive only a subset of the              collection activities: (1) The site visits
                                                  study are: (1) Conducting site visits
                                                                                                                     services. The impact study will use                   with grantees; (2) the web-based survey
                                                  during which researchers interview RPG
                                                  program directors, managers,                                       demographic and outcome data on both                  of frontline staff who provide direct
                                                  supervisors, and frontline staff who                               program (treatment) and comparison                    services to children, adults, and
                                                  work directly with families; (2)                                   groups from a subset of grantees with                 families, and their supervisors; (3) the
                                                  administering a survey to frontline staff                          appropriate local evaluation designs                  semi-annual progress reports; (4)
                                                  involved in providing direct services to                           such as randomized controlled trials or               enrollment and service data provided by
                                                  children, adults, and families; (3) asking                         strong quasi-experimental designs; 5 of               grantees; (5) the web-based survey of
                                                  grantees to provide information about                              the 21 grantees have such designs. Site-              grantee partners; and (6) outcome data
                                                  implementation and their partnerships                              specific impacts will be estimated for                provided by grantees.
                                                  as part of their federally required semi-                          these seven grantees. Aggregated impact                  Respondents. Respondents include
                                                  annual progress reports; (4) obtaining                             estimates will be created by pooling                  grantee staff or contractors (such as local
                                                  service use data from grantees,                                    impact estimates across appropriate                   evaluators) and partner staff. Specific
                                                  enrollment date and demographics of                                sites to obtain a more powerful                       types of respondents and the expected
                                                  enrollees, exit date and reason, and                               summary of the effectiveness of RPG                   number per data collection effort are
                                                  service participation, which are entered                           interventions.                                        noted in the burden table below.
                                                  into a web-based system operated by                                   In addition to conducting local
                                                  Mathematica Policy Research and its                                evaluations and participating in the RPG                 Annual burden estimates. The
                                                  subcontractors; and (5) administering a                            Cross-Site Evaluation, the RPG grantees               following instruments are proposed for
                                                  survey to representatives of the partner                           are legislatively required to report                  public comment under this 30-Day
                                                  organizations.                                                     performance indicators aligned with                   Federal Register Notice. Burden for all
                                                    2. Outcomes Study. The goal of the                               their proposed program strategies and                 components is annualized over three
                                                  outcomes study is to describe the                                  activities. A key strategy of the RPG                 years.

                                                                                                RPG CROSS-SITE EVALUATION ANNUALIZED BURDEN ESTIMATES
                                                                                                                                                                            Average
                                                                                                                                        Total            Number of                            Estimated          Total
                                                                                                                                                                         burden hours
                                                                          Data collection activity                                    number of        responses per                             Total          Annual
                                                                                                                                                                         per response
                                                                                                                                     respondents         respondent                          burden hours    burden hours
                                                                                                                                                                           (in hours)
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                                                                                        Implementation and Partnership Study

                                                  Program director individual interview ...................................                        4                 1                 2                 8           2.67
                                                  Program manager/supervisor group interview .....................                                36                 1                 2                72             24
                                                  Program manager/supervisor individual interviews .............                                  24                 1                 1                24              8
                                                  Frontline staff individual interviews ......................................                    24                 1                 1                24              8
                                                  Semi-annual progress reports .............................................                      21                 6              16.5             2,079            693
                                                  Case enrollment data ...........................................................                63                90              0.25           1,417.5          472.5



                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014      21:47 Sep 16, 2016       Jkt 238001    PO 00000      Frm 00035   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM   19SEN1


                                                                                      Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2016 / Notices                                                                                              64161

                                                                                         RPG CROSS-SITE EVALUATION ANNUALIZED BURDEN ESTIMATES—Continued
                                                                                                                                                                                                       Average
                                                                                                                                                  Total                   Number of                                             Estimated                    Total
                                                                                                                                                                                                    burden hours
                                                                             Data collection activity                                           number of               responses per                                              Total                    Annual
                                                                                                                                                                                                    per response
                                                                                                                                               respondents                respondent                                           burden hours              burden hours
                                                                                                                                                                                                      (in hours)

                                                  Service log entries ...............................................................                          126                     2,340                        0.05                    14,742              4,914
                                                  Staff survey ..........................................................................                       80                         1                        0.42                      33.6               11.2
                                                  Partner survey ......................................................................                         80                         1                        0.33                      26.4                 8.8

                                                                                                                                     Data Entry for Outcomes Study

                                                  Administrative Data:
                                                      Obtain access to administrative data ...........................                                           21                           2                       18                       378                126
                                                      Report administrative data ............................................                                    21                           6                      144                    18,144              6,048
                                                  Standardized instruments:
                                                      Enter data into local database ......................................                                      21                          6                    112.5                     14,175              4,725
                                                      Review records and submit ..........................................                                       21                          6                     100                      12,600              4,200

                                                                                                                               Additional Data Entry for Impact Study

                                                  Data entry for comparison study sites (7 grantees) ............                                                  5                          1                       .25                    1,085              361.6

                                                  Estimated Total Burden Hours ............................................                  ........................   ........................   ........................   ........................      21,602.77



                                                     In compliance with the requirements                                   information collection should be sent                                       Fund (CCDF) expenditures. Authority to
                                                  of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the                                          directly to the following: Office of                                        collect and report this information is
                                                  Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the                                     Management and Budget, Paperwork                                            found in section 658G of the Child Care
                                                  Children’s Bureau within the                                             Reduction Project, Email:                                                   and Development Block Grant Act of
                                                  Administration for Children and                                          OIRASUBMISSION@OMB.EoP.GOV,                                                 1990, as revised. In addition to the
                                                  Families is soliciting public comment                                    Attn: Desk Officer for the                                                  Program Reporting Requirements set
                                                  on the specific aspects of the                                           Administration of Children and                                              forth in 45 CFR part 98, subpart H, the
                                                  information collection described above.                                  Families.                                                                   regulations at 45 CFR 98.65(g) and
                                                  Copies of the proposed collection of                                     Robert Sargis,
                                                                                                                                                                                                       98.67(c)(1) authorize the Secretary to
                                                  information can be obtained and                                                                                                                      require financial reports as necessary.
                                                                                                                           Reports Clearance Officer.
                                                  comments may be forwarded by writing                                                                                                                   The form provides specific data
                                                                                                                           [FR Doc. 2016–22458 Filed 9–16–16; 8:45 am]
                                                  to Administration for Children and                                                                                                                   regarding claims and provides a
                                                                                                                           BILLING CODE P
                                                  Families, Office of Planning, Research,                                                                                                              mechanism for States to request Child
                                                  and Evaluation, 330 C Street SW.,                                                                                                                    Care grant awards and to certify the
                                                  Washington, DC 20416, Attn: ACF                                          DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND                                                    availability of State matching funds.
                                                  Reports Clearance Officer. Email                                         HUMAN SERVICES                                                              Failure to collect this data would
                                                  address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov. All                                                                                                             seriously compromise ACF’s ability to
                                                  requests should be identified by the title                               Administration for Children and                                             monitor Child Care and Development
                                                  of the information collection.                                           Families                                                                    Fund expenditures. This information is
                                                     OMB is required to make a decision                                                                                                                also used to estimate outlays and may
                                                  concerning the collection of information                                 Submission for OMB Review;                                                  be used to prepare ACF budget
                                                  between 30 and 60 days after                                             Comment Request; Child Care and                                             submissions to Congress.
                                                  publication of this document in the                                      Development Fund Financial Report                                             The previous information collection
                                                  Federal Register. Therefore, a comment                                   (ACF–696) for States and Territories                                        requirements related to the American
                                                  is best assured of having its full effect                                  OMB No.: 0970–0163.                                                       Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
                                                  if OMB receives it within 30 days of                                       Description: States and Territories use                                   of 2009, (Pub. L.111–5) have been
                                                  publication. Written comments and                                        the Financial Report Form ACF–696 to                                        deleted from this reporting form.
                                                  recommendations for the proposed                                         report Child Care and Development                                             Respondents: States and territories.

                                                                                                                                     ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES
                                                                                                                                                                                                     Number of                   Average
                                                                                                                                                                          Number of                                                                      Total burden
                                                                                                   Instrument                                                                                      responses per               burden hours
                                                                                                                                                                         respondents                                                                        hours
                                                                                                                                                                                                     respondent                per response

                                                  ACF–696 ..........................................................................................................             56                          4                          5                   1120
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                    Estimated Total Annual Burden                                          Planning, Research and Evaluation, 330                                        OMB Comment: OMB is required to
                                                  Hours: 1120.                                                             C Street SW., Washington, DC 20201.                                         make a decision concerning the
                                                    Additional Information: Copies of the                                  Attention Reports Clearance Officer. All                                    collection of information between 30
                                                  proposed collection may be obtained by                                   requests should be identified by the title                                  and 60 days after publication of this
                                                  writing to the Administration for                                        of the information collection. Email                                        document in the Federal Register.
                                                  Children and Families, Office of                                         address: infocollection@acf.hhs.gov.                                        Therefore, a comment is best assured of


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014        21:47 Sep 16, 2016         Jkt 238001      PO 00000       Frm 00036       Fmt 4703        Sfmt 4703      E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM               19SEN1



Document Created: 2016-09-17 02:29:41
Document Modified: 2016-09-17 02:29:41
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionProposed Information Collection Activity; Comment Request.
FR Citation81 FR 64159 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR