81 FR 64192 - Draft Environmental Impact Statement; Indiana Department of Natural Resources Habitat Conservation Plan

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 181 (September 19, 2016)

Page Range		64192-64193
FR Document		2016-22455

Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (NEPA), we are advising the public that we intend to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) on a proposed Endangered Species Act (ESA) incidental take permit (ITP) application from the Indiana Department of Natural Resources (IDNR), Division of Forestry (DoF) for the federally endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis). We are also announcing the initiation of a public scoping process to engage Federal, Tribal, State, and local governments; special interest groups; and the public in the identification of issues and concerns, potential impacts, and possible alternatives to the proposed action.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 181 (Monday, September 19, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 181 (Monday, September 19, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64192-64193]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22455]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

[FWS-R3-ES-2016-N128]; [FVES59420300000F2 14X FF03E00000]


Draft Environmental Impact Statement; Indiana Department of 
Natural Resources Habitat Conservation Plan

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement; 
notice of scoping meeting; and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as 
amended (NEPA), we are advising the public that we intend to prepare an 
environmental impact statement (EIS) on a proposed Endangered Species 
Act (ESA) incidental take permit (ITP) application from the Indiana 
Department of Natural Resources (IDNR), Division of Forestry (DoF) for 
the federally endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis). We are also 
announcing the initiation of a public scoping process to engage 
Federal, Tribal, State, and local governments; special interest groups; 
and the public in the identification of issues and concerns, potential 
impacts, and possible alternatives to the proposed action.

DATES: Public scoping will begin with the publication of this NOI in 
the Federal Register and will continue through October 19, 2016. We 
will consider all comments on the scope of the EIS analysis that are 
received or postmarked by this date. Comments received or postmarked 
after this date will be considered to the extent practicable. We will 
conduct a public scoping meeting during the scoping period. The scoping 
meeting will provide the public with an opportunity to ask questions, 
discuss issues with Service staff regarding the EIS, and provide 
written comments.
     September 30th, 6:00-9:00 p.m. at the Forestry Training 
Center on Morgan-Monroe State Forest. Directions: from the Forest 
Office at 6220 Forest Road, Martinsville, IN (see Google Maps), go 0.2 
miles north on Forest Road and take the first road to the left (West), 
go 0.4 miles and park at 2nd building on the right. The Forestry 
Training Center is located approx. 6 miles south of Martinsville, IN.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments via U.S. mail to the Field Supervisor, 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington Field Office, 620 South 
Walker Street, Bloomington, IN 47403-2121; by facsimile to 812-334-
4273; or by electronic mail to [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew King, by telephone at 812-334-
4261, extension 1216, or email at [email protected]. If you use a 
telecommunications device for the deaf, please call the Federal 
Information Relay Service at 800-877-8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Introduction

    Indiana bats were listed as an endangered species under the ESA in 
1967. The decline of this species has historically been attributed to 
loss and degradation of winter hibernation habitat and summer roosting 
habitat, human disturbance during hibernation, and possibly pesticides. 
A recent new threat to Indiana bats is white-nose syndrome (WNS), a 
disease caused by the fungus Pseudogymnoascus destructans. WNS has 
caused significant population declines throughout much of the Indiana 
bat's range, particularly in the Northeast and Appalachian regions.
    The DoF conducts management activities on 13 State Forests and 2 
State Recreation Areas covering approximately 158,000 acres of state-
owned forest land in Indiana. These activities include maintenance of 
recreation trails, timber harvest, tree plantings, prescribed burning, 
and the use of specific chemicals such as herbicides and fertilizers. 
Management activities on these lands are designed for long-term 
sustainability and to enhance forest health and diversity, create 
wildlife habitat, provide recreational opportunities and to generate 
revenue from timber harvests that contribute to local and state 
economies. While many forest management activities benefit the 
conservation and recovery of the Indiana bat, some activities may 
adversely impact this species and their habitat during certain life 
stages.
    The net effect of forest management on Indiana bats may vary 
depending on the type, scale, and timing of various practices. Unlike 
forest conversion where habitat is permanently removed, the DoF's 
forest management practices are designed to promote and sustain 
suitable forested bat habitat on the landscape, and adverse impacts 
typically are temporary in nature. The primary potential benefit of 
forest management to the species is perpetuating forests on the 
landscape that provide suitable roosting and foraging habitat. Impacts 
from timber harvest, which can range from the selective removal of 
individual trees to small clearcuts, can range from positive (e.g., 
maintaining or increasing suitable roosting and foraging habitat within 
Indiana bat home ranges) to neutral (e.g., minor amounts of timber 
harvest, areas outside Indiana bats summer home ranges, away from 
hibernacula) to negative (e.g., death of adult female bats and/or pups 
resulting from accidental felling of occupied maternity roost trees). 
Therefore, the DoF is developing a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) in 
support of an ITP that would authorize the incidental take of Indiana 
bats from certain forest management activities on State Forest lands 
within the State of Indiana.
    The HCP will incorporate avoidance, minimization, mitigation, 
monitoring, and reporting measures aimed at addressing the impact of 
take caused by certain forest and property management activities 
occurring on approximately 158,000 acres of state-owned land managed by 
the DoF. The forest and property management activities included in the 
DoF HCP are timber harvesting, prescribed burning, timber stand 
improvement, and the construction and maintenance of roads, trails, and 
recreation and operational facilities. Potential measures to avoid, 
minimize, and mitigate impacts to Indiana bats may include, but are not 
limited to, retention of potential roost trees, sustained supply of 
future roost trees, protection of known roost trees, leave-tree 
designation near perennial streams, seasonal tree-felling restrictions 
around known hibernacula, and set-back distances for the protection of 
hibernacula entrances. The requested term of the ITP is 20 years.

[[Page 64193]]

Habitat Conservation Plans and Incidental Take Permits

    Section 9 of the ESA prohibits ``take'' of fish and wildlife 
species listed as endangered under section 4 (16 U.S.C. 1538, and 1533, 
respectively). The ESA implementing regulations extend, under certain 
circumstances, the prohibition of take to threatened species (50 CFR 
17.31). Under section 3 of the ESA, the term ``take'' means to harass, 
harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or 
attempt to engage in any such conduct (16 U.S.C. 1532(19)).
    Under section 10 of the ESA, the Service may issue permits to 
authorize incidental take of federally listed fish and wildlife 
species. ``Incidental take'' is defined by the ESA as ``take that is 
incidental to, and not the purpose of, carrying out an otherwise lawful 
activity.'' To obtain an ITP, an applicant must submit an HCP to the 
Service that specifies (1) the impact that will likely result from the 
taking; (2) what steps the applicant will take to monitor, minimize and 
mitigate the impacts, the funding that will be available to implement 
such steps and the procedures to be used to deal with changed 
circumstances; (3) what alternative actions to the taking the applicant 
considered and the reasons why the alternatives are not being utilized; 
and (4) how the applicant will carry out any other measures that we may 
require as being necessary or appropriate for purposes of the HCP. 50 
CFR 17.22(b)(1)(iii); 50 CFR 17.32(b)(1)(iii)(C). If we find, after 
opportunity for public comment, with respect to the permit application 
and the related HCP that (1) the taking will be incidental; (2) the 
applicant will, to the maximum extent practicable, minimize and 
mitigate the impacts of such taking; (3) the applicant will ensure that 
adequate funding for the HCP will be provided, as well as procedures to 
deal with unforeseen circumstances; (4) the taking will not appreciably 
reduce the likelihood of the survival and recovery of the species in 
the wild; and (5) the measures, if any, required by us will be carried 
out; and we have received assurances that the plan will be implemented, 
then we will issue the DoF its requested permit. 50 CFR 17.22, 
17.32(b)(2)(i).
    The purpose of an HCP and subsequent issuance of an ITP is to 
authorize the incidental take of threatened or endangered species, not 
to authorize the underlying activities that result in take. This 
process ensures that the effects of the authorized incidental take will 
be adequately minimized and mitigated to the maximum extent practicable 
(Final Handbook for Habitat Conservation Planning and Incidental Take 
Permitting Process (61 FR 63854, December 2, 1996)).

Environmental Impact Statement

    NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) requires that Federal agencies 
conduct an environmental analysis of their proposed actions to 
determine if the actions may significantly affect the human 
environment. Based on 40 CFR 1508.27 and 40 CFR 1508.2, we have 
determined that issuance of an ITP to the DoF, including implementation 
of its proposed HCP (i.e., proposed action), may have significant 
impacts on the human environment. Therefore, before deciding whether to 
issue an ITP to the IDNR, we will prepare an EIS to analyze the 
environmental impacts associated with that action. The EIS will also 
include an analysis of a reasonable range of alternatives to the 
proposed action. Alternatives considered in the EIS may include, but 
are not limited to, variations in the permit term or permit structure; 
the level of take allowed; the level, location, or type of 
conservation, monitoring, or mitigation provided in the HCP; the scope 
of covered activities; or a combination of these factors. Additionally, 
a ``no-action'' alternative will be included that assesses the 
anticipated effects of not issuing an ITP for the DoF's management 
activities.

Request for Information

    We request data, comments, information, and suggestions from the 
public, other concerned governmental agencies, the scientific 
community, Tribes, industry, and any other interested party on this 
notice. We will consider all comments we receive with respect to 
complying with the requirements of NEPA and the development of the HCP 
and ITP. We seek comments particularly related to:
    (1) Information concerning the range, distribution, population 
size, and population trends of Indiana bats and other federally listed 
species in Indiana;
    (2) Additional biological information concerning Indiana bats and 
other federally listed species that occur in Indiana that could be 
affected by activities on State-owned forest land;
    (3) Relevant data and information concerning timber management 
practices and bat interactions;
    (4) Current or planned forest management activities and their 
possible impacts on Indiana bats and other federally listed species in 
Indiana;
    (5) The presence of facilities within the project planning area 
that are eligible to be listed on the National Register of Historic 
Places, or whether other historical, archeological, or traditional 
cultural properties may be present; and
    (6) Any other environmental issues that we should consider with 
regard to the HCP coverage area and potential ITP issuance.

Next Steps

    We are seeking information to assist us in the development of the 
EIS and the associated HCP. We will develop a draft EIS based on a 
complete ITP application, draft HCP, and public comments received 
through this early scoping effort. We may solicit additional public, 
agency, and Tribal input to identify the nature and scope of the 
potentially significant environmental issues that should be addressed 
in the EIS. We will publish a notice of availability for the draft EIS 
and draft HCP, and seek additional public comments, before completing 
our final analysis to determine whether to issue an ITP to the DoF.

Public Availability of Comments

    All comments received, including names and addresses, will become 
part of the administrative record and will be available to the public. 
Before including your address, phone number, electronic mail address, 
or other personal identifying information in your comment, you should 
be aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--will be publicly available. If you submit a hardcopy 
comment that includes personal identifying information, you may request 
at the top of your document that we withhold this information from 
public review. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do 
so.

Authority

    We provide this notice under section 10 of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 
et seq.) and per NEPA regulations (40 CFR 1501.7, 1506.5, and 1508.22).

    Dated: August 22, 2016.
Lori H. Nordstrom,
Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Midwest Region.
[FR Doc. 2016-22455 Filed 9-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4333-15-P

64192 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2016 / Notices

respond: 22 responses (Form I–690) at received or postmarked after this date local and state economies. While many
approximately 3 hours per response; 11 will be considered to the extent forest management activities benefit the
responses (Supplement 1) at practicable. We will conduct a public conservation and recovery of the
approximately 2 hours per response. scoping meeting during the scoping Indiana bat, some activities may
(6) An estimate of the total public period. The scoping meeting will adversely impact this species and their
burden (in hours) associated with the provide the public with an opportunity habitat during certain life stages.
collection: The total estimated annual to ask questions, discuss issues with
The net effect of forest management
hour burden associated with this Service staff regarding the EIS, and
on Indiana bats may vary depending on
collection is 88 hours. provide written comments.
(7) An estimate of the total public • September 30th, 6:00–9:00 p.m. at the type, scale, and timing of various
burden (in cost) associated with the the Forestry Training Center on Morgan- practices. Unlike forest conversion
collection: The estimated total annual Monroe State Forest. Directions: from where habitat is permanently removed,
cost burden associated with this the Forest Office at 6220 Forest Road, the DoF’s forest management practices
collection of information is $3,316.50. Martinsville, IN (see Google Maps), go are designed to promote and sustain
0.2 miles north on Forest Road and take suitable forested bat habitat on the
Dated: September 14, 2016.
the first road to the left (West), go 0.4 landscape, and adverse impacts
Samantha Deshommes, typically are temporary in nature. The
miles and park at 2nd building on the
Chief, Regulatory Coordination Division, primary potential benefit of forest
Office of Policy and Strategy, U.S. Citizenship right. The Forestry Training Center is
and Immigration Services, Department of located approx. 6 miles south of management to the species is
Homeland Security. Martinsville, IN. perpetuating forests on the landscape
[FR Doc. 2016–22461 Filed 9–16–16; 8:45 am] ADDRESSES: Send written comments via that provide suitable roosting and
U.S. mail to the Field Supervisor, U.S. foraging habitat. Impacts from timber
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
Fish and Wildlife Service, Bloomington harvest, which can range from the
Field Office, 620 South Walker Street, selective removal of individual trees to
Bloomington, IN 47403–2121; by small clearcuts, can range from positive
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
facsimile to 812–334–4273; or by (e.g., maintaining or increasing suitable
Fish and Wildlife Service electronic mail to commentbfo@fws.gov. roosting and foraging habitat within
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Indiana bat home ranges) to neutral
[FWS–R3–ES–2016–N128];
Andrew King, by telephone at 812–334– (e.g., minor amounts of timber harvest,
[FVES59420300000F2 14X FF03E00000]
4261, extension 1216, or email at areas outside Indiana bats summer
Draft Environmental Impact Statement; andrew_king@fws.gov. If you use a home ranges, away from hibernacula) to
Indiana Department of Natural telecommunications device for the deaf, negative (e.g., death of adult female bats
Resources Habitat Conservation Plan please call the Federal Information and/or pups resulting from accidental
Relay Service at 800–877–8339. felling of occupied maternity roost
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, trees). Therefore, the DoF is developing
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Interior. a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) in
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an Introduction support of an ITP that would authorize
environmental impact statement; notice Indiana bats were listed as an the incidental take of Indiana bats from
of scoping meeting; and request for endangered species under the ESA in certain forest management activities on
comments. 1967. The decline of this species has State Forest lands within the State of
historically been attributed to loss and Indiana.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National degradation of winter hibernation
Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as The HCP will incorporate avoidance,
habitat and summer roosting habitat,
amended (NEPA), we are advising the minimization, mitigation, monitoring,
human disturbance during hibernation,
public that we intend to prepare an and reporting measures aimed at
and possibly pesticides. A recent new
environmental impact statement (EIS) addressing the impact of take caused by
threat to Indiana bats is white-nose
on a proposed Endangered Species Act certain forest and property management
syndrome (WNS), a disease caused by
(ESA) incidental take permit (ITP) activities occurring on approximately
the fungus Pseudogymnoascus
application from the Indiana destructans. WNS has caused significant 158,000 acres of state-owned land
Department of Natural Resources population declines throughout much of managed by the DoF. The forest and
(IDNR), Division of Forestry (DoF) for the Indiana bat’s range, particularly in property management activities
the federally endangered Indiana bat the Northeast and Appalachian regions. included in the DoF HCP are timber
(Myotis sodalis). We are also The DoF conducts management harvesting, prescribed burning, timber
announcing the initiation of a public activities on 13 State Forests and 2 State stand improvement, and the
scoping process to engage Federal, Recreation Areas covering construction and maintenance of roads,
Tribal, State, and local governments; approximately 158,000 acres of state- trails, and recreation and operational
special interest groups; and the public owned forest land in Indiana. These facilities. Potential measures to avoid,
in the identification of issues and activities include maintenance of minimize, and mitigate impacts to
concerns, potential impacts, and recreation trails, timber harvest, tree Indiana bats may include, but are not
possible alternatives to the proposed plantings, prescribed burning, and the limited to, retention of potential roost
action. use of specific chemicals such as trees, sustained supply of future roost
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

DATES: Public scoping will begin with herbicides and fertilizers. Management trees, protection of known roost trees,
the publication of this NOI in the activities on these lands are designed for leave-tree designation near perennial
Federal Register and will continue long-term sustainability and to enhance streams, seasonal tree-felling restrictions
through October 19, 2016. We will forest health and diversity, create around known hibernacula, and set-
consider all comments on the scope of wildlife habitat, provide recreational back distances for the protection of
the EIS analysis that are received or opportunities and to generate revenue hibernacula entrances. The requested
postmarked by this date. Comments from timber harvests that contribute to term of the ITP is 20 years.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:47 Sep 16, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM 19SEN1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 181 / Monday, September 19, 2016 / Notices 64193

Habitat Conservation Plans and practicable (Final Handbook for Habitat other historical, archeological, or
Incidental Take Permits Conservation Planning and Incidental traditional cultural properties may be
Section 9 of the ESA prohibits ‘‘take’’ Take Permitting Process (61 FR 63854, present; and
of fish and wildlife species listed as December 2, 1996)). (6) Any other environmental issues
endangered under section 4 (16 U.S.C. Environmental Impact Statement that we should consider with regard to
1538, and 1533, respectively). The ESA the HCP coverage area and potential ITP
NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) requires
implementing regulations extend, under issuance.
that Federal agencies conduct an
certain circumstances, the prohibition of
environmental analysis of their Next Steps
take to threatened species (50 CFR
proposed actions to determine if the
17.31). Under section 3 of the ESA, the
actions may significantly affect the We are seeking information to assist
term ‘‘take’’ means to harass, harm,
human environment. Based on 40 CFR us in the development of the EIS and
pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap,
1508.27 and 40 CFR 1508.2, we have the associated HCP. We will develop a
capture, or collect, or attempt to engage
determined that issuance of an ITP to draft EIS based on a complete ITP
in any such conduct (16 U.S.C.
the DoF, including implementation of application, draft HCP, and public
1532(19)).
its proposed HCP (i.e., proposed action), comments received through this early
Under section 10 of the ESA, the
may have significant impacts on the scoping effort. We may solicit additional
Service may issue permits to authorize
human environment. Therefore, before public, agency, and Tribal input to
incidental take of federally listed fish
deciding whether to issue an ITP to the identify the nature and scope of the
and wildlife species. ‘‘Incidental take’’
IDNR, we will prepare an EIS to analyze potentially significant environmental
is defined by the ESA as ‘‘take that is
the environmental impacts associated issues that should be addressed in the
incidental to, and not the purpose of,
with that action. The EIS will also
carrying out an otherwise lawful EIS. We will publish a notice of
include an analysis of a reasonable
activity.’’ To obtain an ITP, an applicant availability for the draft EIS and draft
range of alternatives to the proposed
must submit an HCP to the Service that HCP, and seek additional public
action. Alternatives considered in the
specifies (1) the impact that will likely comments, before completing our final
EIS may include, but are not limited to,
result from the taking; (2) what steps the analysis to determine whether to issue
variations in the permit term or permit
applicant will take to monitor, minimize an ITP to the DoF.
structure; the level of take allowed; the
and mitigate the impacts, the funding
level, location, or type of conservation, Public Availability of Comments
that will be available to implement such
monitoring, or mitigation provided in
steps and the procedures to be used to
the HCP; the scope of covered activities; All comments received, including
deal with changed circumstances; (3)
or a combination of these factors. names and addresses, will become part
what alternative actions to the taking
Additionally, a ‘‘no-action’’ alternative of the administrative record and will be
the applicant considered and the
will be included that assesses the available to the public. Before including
reasons why the alternatives are not
anticipated effects of not issuing an ITP your address, phone number, electronic
being utilized; and (4) how the
for the DoF’s management activities. mail address, or other personal
applicant will carry out any other
measures that we may require as being Request for Information identifying information in your
necessary or appropriate for purposes of comment, you should be aware that
We request data, comments,
the HCP. 50 CFR 17.22(b)(1)(iii); 50 CFR your entire comment—including your
information, and suggestions from the
17.32(b)(1)(iii)(C). If we find, after personal identifying information—will
public, other concerned governmental
opportunity for public comment, with agencies, the scientific community, be publicly available. If you submit a
respect to the permit application and Tribes, industry, and any other hardcopy comment that includes
the related HCP that (1) the taking will interested party on this notice. We will personal identifying information, you
be incidental; (2) the applicant will, to consider all comments we receive with may request at the top of your document
the maximum extent practicable, respect to complying with the that we withhold this information from
minimize and mitigate the impacts of requirements of NEPA and the public review. However, we cannot
such taking; (3) the applicant will development of the HCP and ITP. We guarantee that we will be able to do so.
ensure that adequate funding for the seek comments particularly related to:
HCP will be provided, as well as Authority
(1) Information concerning the range,
procedures to deal with unforeseen distribution, population size, and We provide this notice under section
circumstances; (4) the taking will not population trends of Indiana bats and 10 of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
appreciably reduce the likelihood of the other federally listed species in Indiana; and per NEPA regulations (40 CFR
survival and recovery of the species in (2) Additional biological information
the wild; and (5) the measures, if any, 1501.7, 1506.5, and 1508.22).
concerning Indiana bats and other
required by us will be carried out; and federally listed species that occur in Dated: August 22, 2016.
we have received assurances that the Indiana that could be affected by Lori H. Nordstrom,
plan will be implemented, then we will activities on State-owned forest land; Assistant Regional Director, Ecological
issue the DoF its requested permit. 50 (3) Relevant data and information Services, Midwest Region.
CFR 17.22, 17.32(b)(2)(i). concerning timber management [FR Doc. 2016–22455 Filed 9–16–16; 8:45 am]
The purpose of an HCP and practices and bat interactions; BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
subsequent issuance of an ITP is to (4) Current or planned forest
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES

authorize the incidental take of management activities and their
threatened or endangered species, not to possible impacts on Indiana bats and
authorize the underlying activities that other federally listed species in Indiana;
result in take. This process ensures that (5) The presence of facilities within
the effects of the authorized incidental the project planning area that are
take will be adequately minimized and eligible to be listed on the National
mitigated to the maximum extent Register of Historic Places, or whether

VerDate Sep<11>2014 21:47 Sep 16, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\19SEN1.SGM 19SEN1

Document Created: 2016-09-17 02:29:45
Document Modified: 2016-09-17 02:29:45

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Notices
Action		Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement; notice of scoping meeting; and request for comments.
Dates		Public scoping will begin with the publication of this NOI in the Federal Register and will continue through October 19, 2016. We will consider all comments on the scope of the EIS analysis that are received or postmarked by this date. Comments received or postmarked after this date will be considered to the extent practicable. We will conduct a public scoping meeting during the scoping period. The scoping meeting will provide the public with an opportunity to ask questions, discuss issues with Service staff regarding the EIS, and provide written comments.
Contact		Andrew King, by telephone at 812-334- 4261, extension 1216, or email at [email protected] If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf, please call the Federal Information Relay Service at 800-877-8339.
FR Citation		81 FR 64192

81 FR 64192 - Draft Environmental Impact Statement; Indiana Department of Natural Resources Habitat Conservation Plan

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIORFish and Wildlife Service

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 181 (September 19, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service