81 FR 6549 - Portland General Electric Company; Trojan Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation in Columbia County, Oregon
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 25 (February 8, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 25 (February 8, 2016)
| Page Range | 6549-6551 | |
| FR Document | 2016-02381 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 25 (Monday, February 8, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 6549-6551] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-02381] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [Docket No. 72-17; NRC-2016-0021] Portland General Electric Company; Trojan Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation in Columbia County, Oregon AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; issuance. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing an environmental assessment (EA) and a finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for its review and approval of the decommissioning funding plan submitted by Portland General Electric Company (PGE), on December 13, 2012, for the Trojan independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI). ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2016-0021 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information regarding this document. You may obtain publicly-available information related to this document using any of the following methods:Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2016-0021. Address questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher; telephone: 301-415- 3463; email: [email protected]. For technical questions, contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly-available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``ADAMS Public Documents'' and then select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for each document referenced (if it available in ADAMS) is provided the first time that a document is referenced. In addition, for the convenience of the reader, the ADAMS accession numbers are provided in a table in the, ``Availability of Documents'' section of this document. NRC's PDR: You may examine and purchase copies of public documents at the NRC's PDR, Room O1-F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jose Cuadrado, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-0606, email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Introduction The NRC is considering the approval of the decommissioning funding plan (DFP) for the Trojan ISFSI. Portland General Electric Company (PGE), submitted its DFP for NRC's review and approval by letter dated December 13, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML12355A286). The NRC staff has prepared an EA (ADAMS Accession No. ML16029A242) in support of its review of PGE's DFP, in accordance with the NRC's regulations in part 51 of title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), ``Environmental Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions,'' which implement the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Based on the EA, the NRC staff has determined that approval of the DFP for the Trojan ISFSI will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment, and, accordingly, the staff has concluded that a FONSI is appropriate. The NRC staff further finds that preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) is not warranted. II. Environmental Assessment Summary Background The Trojan ISFSI is located on the Trojan Nuclear Plant site, in Columbia County, Oregon, approximately 42 miles north of the city of Portland, Oregon. Portland General Electric Company (PGE) is authorized by the NRC, under License No. SNM-2509, to store spent nuclear fuel at the Trojan ISFSI. The NRC requires its licensees to plan for the eventual decommissioning of their licensed facilities prior to license termination. On June 17, 2011; 76 FR 35512, the NRC published a final rule in the Federal Register amending its decommissioning planning regulations. The final rule amended the NRC's regulation in 10 CFR 72.30, which concerns financial assurance and decommissioning for ISFSIs. This regulation now requires each holder of, or applicant for, a license under 10 CFR part 72 to submit, for NRC's review and approval, a DFP. The purpose of the DFP is to demonstrate the licensee's financial assurance, i.e., that funds will be available to decommission the ISFSI. The NRC staff is reviewing the DFP submitted by PGE on December 13, 2012. Specifically, the NRC must determine whether PGE's DFP contains the information required by 10 CFR 72.30(b) and whether PGE has provided reasonable assurance that funds will be available to decommission the ISFSI. Proposed Action The proposed federal action is the NRC's review and approval of PGE's DFP submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 72.30(b). In order to approve the DFP, the NRC will evaluate (i) whether the decommissioning cost estimate (DCE) adequately estimates the cost to conduct the required ISFSI decommissioning activities prior to license termination, including identification of the volume of onsite subsurface material containing residual radioactivity that will require remediation to meet the license termination criteria in 10 CFR 20.1402 or 10 CFR 20.1403, and (ii) whether the aggregate dollar amount of PGE's financial instruments provide adequate [[Page 6550]] financial assurance to cover the DCE and that the financial instruments meet the criteria of 10 CFR 72.30(e). The proposed action does not require any changes to the ISFSI's licensed routine operations, maintenance activities, or monitoring programs, nor does it require any new construction or land disturbing activities. The scope of the proposed action concerns only the NRC's review and approval of the PGE's DFP. The scope of the proposed action does not include, and will not result in, the review and approval of any decontamination or decommissioning activity or license termination for the ISFSI. Purpose and Need for the Proposed Action The proposed action provides a means for PGE to demonstrate that it will have sufficient funding to cover the costs of decommissioning the ISFSI, including the reduction of the residual radioactivity at the ISFSI to the level specified by the applicable NRC's license termination regulations concerning release of the property (10 CFR 20.1402 or 10 CFR 20.1403). Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action The NRC's approval of the DFP will not change the scope or nature of the operation of the ISFSI and will not authorize any changes to licensed operations or maintenance activities. The NRC's approval of the DFP will not result in any changes in the types, characteristics, or quantities of radiological or non-radiological effluents released into the environment from the ISFSI, or result in the creation of any solid waste. Moreover, the approval of the DFP will not authorize any construction activity or facility modification. Therefore, the NRC staff concludes that the approval of the DFP is a procedural and administrative action that will not result in any significant impact to the environment. Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (NHPA), requires Federal agencies to consider the effects of their undertakings on historic properties. In accordance with the NHPA implementing regulations at 36 CFR part 800, ``Protection of Historic Properties,'' the NRC's approval of PGE's DFP constitutes a Federal undertaking. The NRC, however, has determined that the approval of the DFP is a type of undertaking that does not have the potential to cause effects on historic properties, assuming such historic properties were present, because the NRC's approval of PGE's DFP will not authorize or result in changes to licensed operations or maintenance activities, or changes in the types, characteristics, or quantities of radiological or non-radiological effluents released into the environment from the ISFSI, or result in the creation of any solid waste. Therefore, in accordance with 36 CFR 800.3(a)(1), no consultation is required under Section 106 of the NHPA. Under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, prior to taking a proposed action, a Federal agency must determine whether (i) endangered and threatened species or their critical habitats are known to be in the vicinity of the proposed action and if so, whether (ii) the proposed Federal action may affect listed species or critical habitats. If the proposed action may affect listed species or critical habitats, the federal agency is required to consult with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and/or the U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service. In accordance with 50 CFR 402.13, the NRC has engaged in informal consultation with the FWS. The NRC has determined that the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect listed species or their critical habitats because the NRC's approval of PGE's DFP will not authorize or result in changes to licensed operations or maintenance activities, or changes in the types, characteristics, or quantities of radiological or non-radiological effluents released into the environment from the ISFSI, or result in the creation of any solid waste. The FWS has concurred with the NRC's determination that the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect listed species or critical habitat. Alternative to the Proposed Action In addition to the proposed action, the NRC evaluated the no-action alternative. The no-action alternative is to deny PGE's DFP. A denial of a DFP that meets the criteria of 10 CFR 72.30(b) does not support the regulatory intent of the 2011 rulemaking. As noted in the rulemaking EA (ADAMS Accession No. ML090500648), not promulgating the 2011 final rule would have increased the likelihood of additional legacy sites. Thus, denying the licensee's DFP, which the NRC has found to meet the criteria of 10 CFR 72.30(b), will undermine the licensee's decommissioning planning. On this basis, the NRC has concluded that the no-action alternative is not a viable alternative. Agencies and Persons Consulted The NRC staff consulted with other agencies and parties regarding the environmental impacts of the proposed action. The NRC provided a draft of its EA to the State of Oregon's Department of Nuclear Energy on June 24, 2015. The State responded via email on June 29, 2015, stating that it had no comments on the proposed action. The NRC also consulted with the FWS. The FWS concurred with the NRC's determination that the proposed action is not likely to adversely affect listed species or critical habitat. III. Finding of No Significant Impact The NRC staff has determined that the proposed action, the review and approval of the DFP, submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 72.30(b), will not authorize or result in changes to licensed operations or maintenance activities, or changes in the types, characteristics, or quantities of radiological or non-radiological effluents released into the environment from the ISFSI, or result in the creation of any solid waste. Moreover, the approval of the DFP will not authorize any construction activity, facility modification, or any other land- disturbing activity. The NRC staff has concluded that the proposed action is a procedural and administrative action and as such, that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment. Therefore, the NRC staff has determined not to prepare an EIS for the proposed action but will issue this FONSI. In accordance with 10 CFR 51.32(a)(4), the FONSI incorporates the EA by reference. IV. Availability of Documents ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ADAMS Accession Date Document No. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ December 13, 2012............ Submission of PGE's ML12355A286 decommissioning funding plan. February 1, 2009............. Environmental ML090500648 Assessment for Final Rule--Decommissionin g Planning. January 20, 2016............. NRC staff's EA for ML16029A242 the approval of the decommissioning funding plan. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [[Page 6551]] The following documents, related to this document, can be found using any of the methods provided in the following table. Instructions for accessing ADAMS were provided under the ADDRESSES section of this document. Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 1st day of February, 2016. For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Steve Ruffin, Acting Branch Chief, Spent Fuel Licensing Branch, Division of Spent Fuel Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. [FR Doc. 2016-02381 Filed 2-5-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 25 / Monday, February 8, 2016 / Notices 6549
home phone numbers in their filings, You may obtain publicly-available U.S.C. 4321 et seq.). Based on the EA,
unless an NRC regulation or other law information related to this document the NRC staff has determined that
requires submission of such using any of the following methods: approval of the DFP for the Trojan ISFSI
information. However, in some • Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to will not significantly affect the quality
instances, a request to intervene will http://www.regulations.gov and search of the human environment, and,
require including information on local for Docket ID NRC–2016–0021. Address accordingly, the staff has concluded that
residence in order to demonstrate a questions about NRC dockets to Carol a FONSI is appropriate. The NRC staff
proximity assertion of interest in the Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; further finds that preparation of an
proceeding. With respect to copyrighted email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For environmental impact statement (EIS) is
works, except for limited excerpts that technical questions, contact the not warranted.
serve the purpose of the adjudicatory individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
II. Environmental Assessment
filings and would constitute a Fair Use INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
Summary
application, participants are requested document.
not to include copyrighted materials in • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Background
their submission. Access and Management System The Trojan ISFSI is located on the
The Commission will issue a notice or (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly- Trojan Nuclear Plant site, in Columbia
order granting or denying a hearing available documents online in the County, Oregon, approximately 42 miles
request or intervention petition, ADAMS Public Documents collection at north of the city of Portland, Oregon.
designating the issues for any hearing http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ Portland General Electric Company
that will be held and designating the adams.html. To begin the search, select (PGE) is authorized by the NRC, under
Presiding Officer. A notice granting a ‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then License No. SNM–2509, to store spent
hearing will be published in the Federal select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS nuclear fuel at the Trojan ISFSI.
Register and served on the parties to the Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, The NRC requires its licensees to plan
hearing. please contact the NRC’s Public for the eventual decommissioning of
For further details with respect to this Document Room (PDR) reference staff at their licensed facilities prior to license
application, see the letters dated 1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by termination. On June 17, 2011; 76 FR
November 12 and December 9, 2015. email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The 35512, the NRC published a final rule in
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 27th day ADAMS accession number for each the Federal Register amending its
of January 2016. document referenced (if it available in decommissioning planning regulations.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ADAMS) is provided the first time that The final rule amended the NRC’s
Balwant K. Singal,
a document is referenced. In addition, regulation in 10 CFR 72.30, which
for the convenience of the reader, the concerns financial assurance and
Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing
Branch IV–1, Division of Operating Reactor
ADAMS accession numbers are decommissioning for ISFSIs. This
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor provided in a table in the, ‘‘Availability regulation now requires each holder of,
Regulation. of Documents’’ section of this or applicant for, a license under 10 CFR
[FR Doc. 2016–02380 Filed 2–5–16; 8:45 am] document. part 72 to submit, for NRC’s review and
• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and approval, a DFP. The purpose of the
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
purchase copies of public documents at DFP is to demonstrate the licensee’s
the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One financial assurance, i.e., that funds will
NUCLEAR REGULATORY White Flint North, 11555 Rockville be available to decommission the ISFSI.
COMMISSION Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The NRC staff is reviewing the DFP
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jose submitted by PGE on December 13,
[Docket No. 72–17; NRC–2016–0021]
Cuadrado, Office of Nuclear Material 2012. Specifically, the NRC must
Portland General Electric Company; Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear determine whether PGE’s DFP contains
Trojan Independent Spent Fuel Storage Regulatory Commission, Washington, the information required by 10 CFR
Installation in Columbia County, DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415– 72.30(b) and whether PGE has provided
Oregon 0606, email: Jose.Cuadrado@nrc.gov. reasonable assurance that funds will be
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: available to decommission the ISFSI.
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission. I. Introduction Proposed Action
ACTION: Environmental assessment and The NRC is considering the approval The proposed federal action is the
finding of no significant impact; of the decommissioning funding plan NRC’s review and approval of PGE’s
issuance. (DFP) for the Trojan ISFSI. Portland DFP submitted in accordance with 10
General Electric Company (PGE), CFR 72.30(b). In order to approve the
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory submitted its DFP for NRC’s review and DFP, the NRC will evaluate (i) whether
Commission (NRC) is issuing an approval by letter dated December 13, the decommissioning cost estimate
environmental assessment (EA) and a 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. (DCE) adequately estimates the cost to
finding of no significant impact (FONSI) ML12355A286). The NRC staff has conduct the required ISFSI
for its review and approval of the prepared an EA (ADAMS Accession No. decommissioning activities prior to
decommissioning funding plan ML16029A242) in support of its review license termination, including
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
submitted by Portland General Electric of PGE’s DFP, in accordance with the identification of the volume of onsite
Company (PGE), on December 13, 2012, NRC’s regulations in part 51 of title 10 subsurface material containing residual
for the Trojan independent spent fuel of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 radioactivity that will require
storage installation (ISFSI). CFR), ‘‘Environmental Protection remediation to meet the license
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID Regulations for Domestic Licensing and termination criteria in 10 CFR 20.1402
NRC–2016–0021 when contacting the Related Regulatory Functions,’’ which or 10 CFR 20.1403, and (ii) whether the
NRC about the availability of implement the National Environmental aggregate dollar amount of PGE’s
information regarding this document. Policy Act of 1969, as amended (42 financial instruments provide adequate
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:51 Feb 05, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM 08FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_6574/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 25 / Monday, February 8, 2016 / Notices 6551
The following documents, related to following procedures apply to public compliance with securities law
this document, can be found using any participation in the meeting: requirements and assures the public
of the methods provided in the 1. Persons who wish to provide a availability of such information. We
following table. Instructions for written statement should submit an estimate that Form F–8 takes
accessing ADAMS were provided under electronic copy to Ms. Holiday at the approximately one hour per response to
the ADDRESSES section of this document. contact information listed above. All prepare and is filed by approximately 5
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 1st day submittals must be received by March respondents. We estimate that 25% of
of February, 2016. 07, 2016, three business days prior to one hour per response (15 minutes) is
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
the meeting, and must pertain to the prepared by the company for a total
topic on the agenda for the meeting. annual reporting burden of one hour (15
Steve Ruffin,
2. Questions and comments from minutes/60 minutes per response × 5
Acting Branch Chief, Spent Fuel Licensing members of the public will be permitted
Branch, Division of Spent Fuel Management,
responses = 1.25 hours rounded to the
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and
during the meetings, at the discretion of nearest whole number one hour).
Safeguards. the Chairman. Written comments are invited on: (a)
3. The draft transcript and meeting whether this proposed collection of
[FR Doc. 2016–02381 Filed 2–5–16; 8:45 am]
summary will be available on ACMUI’s information is necessary for the proper
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
Web site http://www.nrc.gov/reading- performance of the functions of the
rm/doc-collections/acmui/meetings/ agency, including whether the
NUCLEAR REGULATORY 2016.html on or about April 21, 2016. information will have practical utility;
COMMISSION This meeting will be held in (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
accordance with the Atomic Energy Act of the burden imposed by the collection
Advisory Committee on the Medical of 1954, as amended (primarily Section of information; (c) ways to enhance the
Uses of Isotopes: Meeting Notice 161a); the Federal Advisory Committee quality, utility, and clarity of the
Act (5 U.S.C. App); and the information collected; and (d) ways to
AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s regulations in 10 CFR minimize the burden of the collection of
Commission. part 7. information on respondents, including
ACTION: Notice of meeting. through the use of automated collection
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory of February 2016. techniques or other forms of information
Commission will convene a Andrew L. Bates, technology. Consideration will be given
teleconference meeting of the Advisory Advisory Committee Management Officer. to comments and suggestions submitted
Committee on the Medical Uses of [FR Doc. 2016–02382 Filed 2–5–16; 8:45 am] in writing within 60 days of this
Isotopes (ACMUI) on March 10, 2016, to BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
publication.
discuss the draft report of the ACMUI An agency may not conduct or
Training and Experience for Authorized sponsor, and a person is not required to
Users of Alpha, Beta and Gamma respond to, a collection of information
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE unless it displays a currently valid
Emitters (Title 10 of the Code of Federal COMMISSION
Regulations (10 CFR) Section 35.390) control number.
Subcommittee. This report will include Proposed Collection; Comment Please direct your written comment to
the subcommittee’s recommendation for Request Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
the total number of training and Information Officer, Securities and
experience hours for authorized users Upon Written Request Copies Available Exchange Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-
for 35.390 that is necessary for safety. From: Securities and Exchange Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
Meeting information, including a copy Commission, Office of FOIA Services, DC 20549 or send an email to: PRA_
of the agenda and handouts, will be 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC Mailbox@sec.gov.
available at http://www.nrc.gov/reading- 20549–0213. Dated: February 2, 2016.
rm/doc-collections/acmui/meetings/ Extension: Robert W. Errett,
2016.html. The agenda and handouts Form F–8. SEC File No. 270–332, OMB Deputy Secretary.
may also be obtained by contacting Ms. Control No. 3235–0378.
[FR Doc. 2016–02339 Filed 2–5–16; 8:45 am]
Sophie Holiday using the information Notice is hereby given that, pursuant BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
below. to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
DATES: The teleconference meeting will (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
be held on Thursday, March 10, 2016, and Exchange Commission SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. Eastern Time. (‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments COMMISSION
Public Participation: Any member of on the collection of information
the public who wishes to participate in summarized below. The Commission Proposed Collection; Comment
the teleconference should contact Ms. plans to submit this existing collection Request
Holiday using the contact information of information to the Office of
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
below. Management and Budget for extension
From: Securities and Exchange
Contact Information: Sophie Holiday, and approval.
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
Form F–8 (17 CFR 239.38) may be
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
email: sophie.holiday@nrc.gov, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
telephone: (301) 415–7865. used to register securities of certain
20549–2736.
Canadian issuers under the Securities
Conduct of the Meeting Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) that Extension: Rule 15b1–1/Form BD;
Dr. Philip Alderson, ACMUI will be used in an exchange offer or SEC File No. 270–19, OMB Control No.
Chairman, will preside over the business combination. The information 3235–0012.
meeting. Dr. Alderson will conduct the collected is intended to ensure that the Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
meeting in a manner that will facilitate information required to be filed by the to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
the orderly conduct of business. The Commission permits verification of (‘‘PRA’’) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:51 Feb 05, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\08FEN1.SGM 08FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_6574/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-02-06 00:24:31
Document Modified: 2016-02-06 00:24:31
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact; issuance. | |
| Contact | Jose Cuadrado, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-0606, email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 6549 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR