81 FR 65696 - Commercial Driver's License Standards: Application for Exemption; CRST Expedited
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 185 (September 23, 2016)
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 185 (September 23, 2016)
| Page Range | 65696-65698 | |
| FR Document | 2016-22961 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 185 (Friday, September 23, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 65696-65698] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-22961] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration [Docket No. FMCSA-2015-0480] Commercial Driver's License Standards: Application for Exemption; CRST Expedited AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of final disposition; grant of application for exemption. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to grant CRST Expedited (CRST) an exemption from the regulation that requires a commercial learner's permit (CLP) holder to be accompanied by a commercial driver's license (CDL) holder with the proper CDL class and endorsements, seated in the front seat of the vehicle while the CLP holder performs behind-the- wheel training on public roads or highways. Under the terms and conditions of this exemption, a CLP holder who has documentation of passing the CDL skills test may drive a commercial motor vehicle (CMV) for CRST without being accompanied by a CDL holder in the front seat of the vehicle. The exemption enables CLP holders to drive as part of a team and have the same regulatory flexibility as CRST team drivers with CDLs. FMCSA has analyzed the exemption application and the public comments and has determined that the exemption, subject to the terms and conditions imposed, will achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved absent such exemption. DATES: The exemption is effective from September 23, 2016 through September 24, 2018. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Tom Yager, Chief, FMCSA Driver and Carrier Operations Division; Office of Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety Standards; Telephone: (614) 942-6477. Email: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to grant exemptions from some of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations. FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption request in the Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must provide the public an opportunity to inspect the information relevant to the application, including any safety analyses that have been conducted. The Agency must also provide an opportunity for public comment on the request. The Agency reviews the safety analyses and the public comments, and determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305). The decision of the Agency must be published in the Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(b)) with the reason for the grant or denial, and, if granted, the specific person or class of persons receiving the exemption, and the regulatory provision or provisions from which exemption is granted. The notice must also specify the effective period of the exemption, and explain the terms and conditions of the exemption. The exemption may be renewed (49 CFR 381.300(b)). Request for Exemption CRST is one of the nation's largest transportation companies with a fleet of more than 4,500 CMVs. CRST seeks an exemption from 49 CFR 383.25(a)(1) that would allow CLP holders who have successfully passed a CDL skills test and are thus eligible to receive a CDL, to drive a truck without a CDL holder being present in the front seat of the vehicle. CRST indicates that the CDL holder will remain in the vehicle at all times while the CLP holder is driving--just not in the front seat. This would allow a CLP holder to participate in a revenue- producing trip back to his or her State of domicile to obtain the CDL document, as the CDL can only be issued by the State of domicile in accordance with 49 CFR part 383. CRST noted the trucking industry's need for qualified and well- trained drivers to meet increasing shipping demands. CRST believes that 49 CFR 383.25(a)(1) limits its ability to efficiently recruit, train, and employ new entrants to the industry. Prior to the implementation of section 385.25(a)(1), States routinely issued temporary CDLs to drivers who passed the CDL skills test. The temporary CDL allowed CRST time to route the new driver to his or her State of domicile to obtain the permanent CDL and place the new driver into an on-the-job training position with a driver-trainer. The driver-trainer supervised and observed the new driver, but was not required to be on duty and in the front seat at all times. Thus, the new driver became productive immediately, allowing more freight movement for CRST and compensation for the new driver. CRST contends that compliance with the CDL rule places them in a very difficult position regarding how they return CLP holders who have passed their skills testing to their State of domicile to obtain their CDL. According to CRST, the two possible courses of action in this scenario are simple, yet costly: (1) CRST sends CLP holders to their home State by public transportation to obtain the CDL and hopes the drivers return to CRST for employment; or (2) CRST sends CLP holders back to their home State as passengers on one of its trucks. Granting the exemption would allow the CLP holder to drive as part of a team on that trip, resulting in reduced costs and increased productivity. CRST asserts that the exemption would be consistent with the Agency's comments in the preamble to the final rule adopting Sec. 383.25 that ``FMCSA does not believe that it is safe to permit inexperienced drivers who have not passed the CDL skills test to drive unaccompanied.'' (76 FR 26854, 26861 May 9, 2011). The exemption sought would apply only to those CRST drivers who have passed the CDL skills test and hold a CLP. CRST believes that the exemption would result in a level of safety that is equivalent to or greater than the level of safety provided under the rule. The only difference between a CLP holder who has passed the CDL skills test and a CDL holder is that the latter has received the actual CDL document from a State driver licensing agency. Public Comments On January 5, 2016, FMCSA published notice of this application and requested public comment (81 FR 291). The Agency received 56 comments. Most of the comments opposed to the CRST request were from truck drivers, driver-trainers, and other individuals. These respondents do not believe that it is safe for a CLP holder to operate a CMV without the supervision of a CDL driver-trainer in the front seat of the truck. The Iowa Motor Truck Association (IMTA) supported the exemption request, commenting that if CLP holders are properly trained and tested, the fact that they have not yet obtained their [[Page 65697]] CDL credential would in no way compromise the safety of the operation. IMTA added that granting this exemption would enhance the productivity while maintaining the safety of CRST's operation. It would also give the applicant flexibility to allow a CLP holder who has successfully passed all CDL exams to operate more freely and in a way that benefits the driver, the carrier and the economy as a whole. According to IMTA, one of the issues with the current CLP rule is the fact that it's not always convenient to allow the CLP driver to return to their home state immediately after completing training and passing their CDL exam. The exemption would allow these drivers to join a team operation, and give CRST the time to get CLP holders through their State of domicile at a future time to complete the conversion of the CLP to a CDL. IMTA is confident in the safety and performance of CRST and believe that, if granted, these drivers would operate safely within the terms of their exemption. Opposing the exemption were three industry groups, the Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety (Advocates), the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA), and the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT). Advocates commented that ``FMCSA must reject the CRST application because it undermines existing Federal safety regulations, and will usurp the exclusive authority of states to determine who should be granted commercial driving privileges associated with the issuance of a CDL. The Application also fails to evaluate any potential safety risk to the public or address alternative means of pursuing the goal of the exemption. The Application appears to be an obvious attempt to increase company profits while ignoring the potentially significant increase in truck crash risk to the motoring public.'' OOIDA believes the exemption sought by CRST is not in the interest of highway safety, will put OOIDA members who share the road with these poorly trained drivers at risk, and fails to demonstrate that an exemption would result in ``a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved absent such exemption'' as set forth in 49 U.S.C. 31315(b). Further, OOIDA states that CRST does not demonstrate that it is ``significantly burdened'' by the existing regulation and rather only demonstrates a desire to increase productivity and preserve CRST's current business practices. OOIDA finds the request fails to meet the applicable standards the FMCSA must consider and is ill-timed, considering FMCSA is currently reviewing entry-level driver training standards. In a similar vein, IBT commented, ``It is clear from CRST's application that it is more concerned about saving money and retaining the investment that it has made in the training of the driver than making sure that the CLP holder receives the proper mentoring and supervision needed for first time CLP holders while they gather their behind-the-wheel training. Neither the DOT nor the FMCSA should entertain the relaxing of important safety standards so that motor carriers have a better opportunity to retain drivers that they have trained. The idea that a driver may not return to the company that provided his/her training has more to do with overall pay and benefits that the motor carrier may be offering in the long term than the time or distance traveled for the CLP holder to obtain a CDL from the CLP holder's home state in the short term. Neither should it be a goal of the DOT or FMCSA to `promote greater productivity' for a motor carrier or allow CLP holders to `actively earn a living faster.' The department's goal should be safety. Finally, the IBT feels strongly that there is no substituting the skills test for behind-the-wheel training of CLP holders by experienced CDL holders in the front seat of the CMV.'' FMCSA Response and Decision The premise of respondents opposing the exemption is that CLP holders lack experience and are safer drivers when observed by a CDL driver-trainer who is on duty and in the front seat of the vehicle. The fact is that CLP holders who have passed the CDL skills test are qualified and eligible to obtain a CDL. If these CLP holders had obtained their training and CLPs in their State of domicile, they could immediately obtain their CDL at the State driver licensing agency and begin driving a CMV without any on-board supervision. There is no data showing that having a CDL holder accompany a CLP holder who has passed the skills test improves safety. Because these drivers have passed the CDL skills test, the only thing necessary to obtain the CDL is to visit the Department of Motor Vehicles office in their State of domicile. FMCSA has evaluated CRST's application for exemption and the public comments. The Agency believes that CRST's overall safety performance, as reflected in its ``satisfactory'' safety rating, will enable it to achieve a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level of safety achieved without the exemption (49 CFR 381.305(a)). The exemption is restricted to CRST's CLP holders who have documentation that they have passed the CDL skills test. The exemption will enable these drivers to operate a CMV as a team driver without requiring the accompanying CDL holder be on duty and in the front seat while the vehicle is moving. Terms and Conditions of the Exemption Period of the Exemption This exemption from the requirements of 49 CFR 383.25(a)(1) is effective during the period of September 23, 2016 through September 24, 2018. Extent of the Exemption The exemption is contingent upon CRST maintaining USDOT registration, minimum levels of public liability insurance, and not being subject to any ``imminent hazard'' or other out-of- service (OOS) order issued by FMCSA. Each driver covered by the exemption must maintain a valid driver's license and CLP with the required endorsements, not be subject to any OOS order or suspension of driving privileges, and meet all physical qualifications required by 49 CFR part 391. This exemption from 49 CFR 383.25(a)(1) will allow CRST drivers who hold a CLP and have successfully passed a CDL skills test, to drive a CMV without a CDL holder being present in the front seat of the vehicle. The CDL holder must remain in the vehicle at all times while the CLP holder is driving--just not in the front seat. Preemption During the period this exemption is in effect, no State may enforce any law or regulation that conflicts with or is inconsistent with the exemption with respect to a person or entity operating under the exemption (49 U.S.C. 31315(d)). FMCSA Accident Notification CRST must notify FMCSA within 5 business days of any accidents (as defined by 49 CFR 390.5) involving the operation of any of its CMVs while utilizing this exemption. The notification must be by email to [email protected], and include the following information: a. Exemption Identifier: ``CRST'' b. Date of the accident, c. City or town, and State, in which the accident occurred, or which is closest to the scene of the accident, d. Driver's name and driver's license number, e. Vehicle number and State license number, [[Page 65698]] f. Number of individuals suffering physical injury, g. Number of fatalities, h. The police-reported cause of the accident, i. Whether the driver was cited for violation of any traffic laws, or motor carrier safety regulations, and j. The total driving time and the total on-duty time of the CMV driver at the time of the accident. Termination The FMCSA does not believe the CLP-holders covered by the exemption will experience any deterioration of their safety record. However, should this occur, FMCSA will take all steps necessary to protect the public interest, including revocation of the exemption. The FMCSA will immediately revoke the exemption for failure to comply with its terms and conditions. Issued on: September 12, 2016. T.F. Scott Darling, III, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2016-22961 Filed 9-22-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P
![65696 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 185 / Friday, September 23, 2016 / Notices
Federal programs and activities apply to this Background obtain the permanent CDL and place the
program.) new driver into an on-the-job training
FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C.
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) 31136(e) and 31315 to grant exemptions position with a driver-trainer. The
Issued on: September 12, 2016. from some of the Federal Motor Carrier driver-trainer supervised and observed
Safety Regulations. FMCSA must the new driver, but was not required to
Peter Osborn,
publish a notice of each exemption be on duty and in the front seat at all
Division Administrator, Federal Highway times. Thus, the new driver became
Administration, Albany, New York. request in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(a)). The Agency must provide productive immediately, allowing more
[FR Doc. 2016–22700 Filed 9–22–16; 8:45 am] freight movement for CRST and
the public an opportunity to inspect the
BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P compensation for the new driver.
information relevant to the application,
CRST contends that compliance with
including any safety analyses that have the CDL rule places them in a very
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION been conducted. The Agency must also difficult position regarding how they
provide an opportunity for public return CLP holders who have passed
Federal Motor Carrier Safety comment on the request. their skills testing to their State of
Administration The Agency reviews the safety domicile to obtain their CDL. According
analyses and the public comments, and to CRST, the two possible courses of
[Docket No. FMCSA–2015–0480] determines whether granting the action in this scenario are simple, yet
exemption would likely achieve a level costly: (1) CRST sends CLP holders to
Commercial Driver’s License of safety equivalent to, or greater than, their home State by public
Standards: Application for Exemption; the level that would be achieved by the transportation to obtain the CDL and
CRST Expedited current regulation (49 CFR 381.305). hopes the drivers return to CRST for
The decision of the Agency must be employment; or (2) CRST sends CLP
AGENCY:Federal Motor Carrier Safety published in the Federal Register (49 holders back to their home State as
Administration (FMCSA), DOT. CFR 381.315(b)) with the reason for the passengers on one of its trucks. Granting
ACTION: Notice of final disposition; grant grant or denial, and, if granted, the the exemption would allow the CLP
of application for exemption. specific person or class of persons holder to drive as part of a team on that
receiving the exemption, and the trip, resulting in reduced costs and
SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its regulatory provision or provisions from increased productivity.
decision to grant CRST Expedited which exemption is granted. The notice CRST asserts that the exemption
(CRST) an exemption from the must also specify the effective period of would be consistent with the Agency’s
regulation that requires a commercial the exemption, and explain the terms comments in the preamble to the final
learner’s permit (CLP) holder to be and conditions of the exemption. The rule adopting § 383.25 that ‘‘FMCSA
accompanied by a commercial driver’s exemption may be renewed (49 CFR does not believe that it is safe to permit
license (CDL) holder with the proper 381.300(b)). inexperienced drivers who have not
CDL class and endorsements, seated in Request for Exemption passed the CDL skills test to drive
the front seat of the vehicle while the unaccompanied.’’ (76 FR 26854, 26861
CRST is one of the nation’s largest May 9, 2011). The exemption sought
CLP holder performs behind-the-wheel
transportation companies with a fleet of would apply only to those CRST drivers
training on public roads or highways.
more than 4,500 CMVs. CRST seeks an who have passed the CDL skills test and
Under the terms and conditions of this
exemption from 49 CFR 383.25(a)(1) hold a CLP. CRST believes that the
exemption, a CLP holder who has
that would allow CLP holders who have exemption would result in a level of
documentation of passing the CDL skills
successfully passed a CDL skills test and safety that is equivalent to or greater
test may drive a commercial motor
are thus eligible to receive a CDL, to than the level of safety provided under
vehicle (CMV) for CRST without being
drive a truck without a CDL holder the rule. The only difference between a
accompanied by a CDL holder in the
being present in the front seat of the CLP holder who has passed the CDL
front seat of the vehicle. The exemption
vehicle. CRST indicates that the CDL skills test and a CDL holder is that the
enables CLP holders to drive as part of
holder will remain in the vehicle at all latter has received the actual CDL
a team and have the same regulatory
times while the CLP holder is driving— document from a State driver licensing
flexibility as CRST team drivers with
just not in the front seat. This would agency.
CDLs. FMCSA has analyzed the
allow a CLP holder to participate in a
exemption application and the public Public Comments
revenue-producing trip back to his or
comments and has determined that the
her State of domicile to obtain the CDL On January 5, 2016, FMCSA
exemption, subject to the terms and
document, as the CDL can only be published notice of this application and
conditions imposed, will achieve a level
issued by the State of domicile in requested public comment (81 FR 291).
of safety that is equivalent to, or greater
accordance with 49 CFR part 383. The Agency received 56 comments.
than, the level that would be achieved CRST noted the trucking industry’s Most of the comments opposed to the
absent such exemption. need for qualified and well-trained CRST request were from truck drivers,
DATES: The exemption is effective from drivers to meet increasing shipping driver-trainers, and other individuals.
September 23, 2016 through September demands. CRST believes that 49 CFR These respondents do not believe that it
24, 2018. 383.25(a)(1) limits its ability to is safe for a CLP holder to operate a
efficiently recruit, train, and employ
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. CMV without the supervision of a CDL
new entrants to the industry. Prior to driver-trainer in the front seat of the
Tom Yager, Chief, FMCSA Driver and
the implementation of section truck.
Carrier Operations Division; Office of
385.25(a)(1), States routinely issued The Iowa Motor Truck Association
Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety
temporary CDLs to drivers who passed (IMTA) supported the exemption
Standards; Telephone: (614) 942–6477.
the CDL skills test. The temporary CDL request, commenting that if CLP holders
Email: MCPSD@dot.gov.
allowed CRST time to route the new are properly trained and tested, the fact
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: driver to his or her State of domicile to that they have not yet obtained their
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Sep 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM 23SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_65881/page/1.svg)
![65698 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 185 / Friday, September 23, 2016 / Notices
f. Number of individuals suffering Toone, Information Collection Clearance collection activities on the public by
physical injury, Officer, Office of Information automated, electronic, mechanical, or
g. Number of fatalities, Technology, RAD–20, FRA, 1200 New other technological collection
h. The police-reported cause of the Jersey Avenue SE., Mail Stop 35, techniques or other forms of information
accident, Washington, DC 20590. Commenters technology (e.g., permitting electronic
i. Whether the driver was cited for requesting that FRA acknowledge submission of responses). See 44 U.S.C.
violation of any traffic laws, or receipt of their respective comments 3506(c)(2)(A); 5 CFR 1320.8(d)(1). FRA
motor carrier safety regulations, and must include a self-addressed stamped believes that soliciting public comment
j. The total driving time and the total postcard stating, ‘‘Comments on OMB will advance three objectives: (1)
on-duty time of the CMV driver at Control Number 2130–0590’’ and Reduce reporting burdens; (2) ensure
the time of the accident. should also include the title of the that it organizes information collection
collection of information. Alternatively, requirements in a ‘‘user friendly’’ format
Termination
comments may be faxed to (202) 493– to improve the use of such information;
The FMCSA does not believe the CLP- 6216 or (202) 493–6497, or emailed to and (3) accurately assess the resources
holders covered by the exemption will Mr. Brogan at Robert.Brogan@dot.gov, or expended to retrieve and produce
experience any deterioration of their to Ms. Toone at Kim.Toone@dot.gov. information requested. See 44 U.S.C.
safety record. However, should this Please refer to the assigned OMB control 3501.
occur, FMCSA will take all steps number in any correspondence Below is a brief summary of the
necessary to protect the public interest, submitted. FRA will summarize currently approved information
including revocation of the exemption. comments received in response to this collection activities that FRA will be
The FMCSA will immediately revoke notice in a subsequent notice and submitting for clearance by OMB as
the exemption for failure to comply include them in its information required under the PRA:
with its terms and conditions. collection submission to OMB for
Title: Alleged Violation Reporting
Issued on: September 12, 2016. approval.
Form.
T.F. Scott Darling, III, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. OMB Control Number: 2130–0590.
Administrator. Robert Brogan, Information Collection Abstract: The Alleged Violation
[FR Doc. 2016–22961 Filed 9–22–16; 8:45 am] Clearance Officer, Regulatory Analysis Reporting Form is a response to section
BILLING CODE 4910–EX–P
Division, RRS–21, Federal Railroad 307(b) of the Rail Safety Improvement
Administration, 1200 Jersey Avenue Act of 2008 that requires FRA to
SE., Mail Stop 25, Washington, DC ‘‘provide a mechanism for the public to
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 20590 (telephone: (202) 493–6292) or submit written reports of potential
Ms. Kim Toone, Information Collection violations of Federal railroad safety and
Federal Railroad Administration Clearance Officer, Office of Information hazardous materials transportation laws,
Technology, RAD–20, Federal Railroad
[Docket No. FRA–2010–0002–N–23] regulations, and orders to the Federal
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Railroad Administration.’’ The Alleged
Proposed Agency Information Avenue SE., Mail Stop 35, Washington,
Violation Reporting Form allows the
Collection Activities; Comment DC 20590 (telephone: (202) 493–6132).
general public to submit alleged
Request (These telephone numbers are not toll
violations directly to FRA. The form’s
free.)
AGENCY: Federal Railroad goal is to allow FRA to collect
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The PRA, information necessary to investigate the
Administration (FRA), Department of 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520, and its
Transportation (DOT). alleged violation and to follow up with
implementing regulations, 5 CFR part the submitting party.
ACTION: Notice and request for 1320, require Federal agencies to The Alleged Violation Reporting Form
comments. provide 60-days’ notice to the public for collects the name, phone number, and
comment on information collection email address of the person submitting
SUMMARY: Under the Paperwork
activities before seeking approval for the alleged violation; the preferred
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) and its reinstatement or renewal by OMB. See
implementing regulations, FRA seeks method by which to contact the person;
44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A); 5 CFR the railroad or company name that
renewal of the following currently 1320.8(d)(1), 1320.10(e)(1), 1320.12(a).
approved information collection committed the alleged violation; the
Specifically, FRA invites interested date and time the alleged violation
activities. Before submitting the respondents to comment on the
information collection requirements for occurred; the location the alleged
following summary of proposed violation occurred; and details about the
clearance by the Office of Management information collection activities
and Budget (OMB), FRA is soliciting violation. All information is voluntary.
regarding: (1) Whether the information FRA will collect the information
public comment on specific aspects of collection activities are necessary for
the activities identified in this notice. through a form on the FRA public Web
FRA to properly execute its functions, site. FRA may share the information
DATES: Comments must be received no including whether the activities will
later than November 22, 2016. collected with FRA employees, State
have practical utility; (2) the accuracy of department of transportation partners,
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments FRA’s estimates of the burden of the and law enforcement agencies.
on the following proposed activities by information collection activities,
mail to either: Mr. Robert Brogan, including the validity of the Form Number(s): FRA F 6180.151.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Information Collection Clearance methodology and assumptions used to Affected Public: U.S. Residents.
Officer, Office of Railroad Safety, determine the estimates; (3) ways for Respondent Universe: 1,000
Regulatory Analysis Division, RRS–21, FRA to enhance the quality, utility, and individuals.
Federal Railroad Administration, 1200 clarity of the information being Frequency of Submission: On
New Jersey Avenue SE., Mail Stop 25, collected; and (4) ways for FRA to occasion.
Washington, DC 20590, or Ms. Kim minimize the burden of information Reporting Burden:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:22 Sep 22, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23SEN1.SGM 23SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_65881/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-09-23 01:43:28
Document Modified: 2016-09-23 01:43:28
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Notice of final disposition; grant of application for exemption. | |
| Dates | The exemption is effective from September 23, 2016 through September 24, 2018. | |
| Contact | Mr. Tom Yager, Chief, FMCSA Driver and Carrier Operations Division; Office of Carrier, Driver and Vehicle Safety Standards; Telephone: (614) 942-6477. Email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 65696 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR