81 FR 65889 - Safety Zone; Arkansas River, Little Rock, AR

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 186 (September 26, 2016)

Page Range		65889-65891
FR Document		2016-23122

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for all waters of the Arkansas River beginning at mile marker 118.6 and ending at mile marker 119.6. The safety zone is necessary to protect persons, property, and infrastructure from potential damage and safety hazards associated with the demolition of the Broadway Bridge. This rulemaking would impose a speed restriction and prohibit persons and vessels from entering the safety zone area during certain operations unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Memphis or a designated representative.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 186 (Monday, September 26, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 186 (Monday, September 26, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65889-65891]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23122]



[[Page 65889]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0885]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Arkansas River, Little Rock, AR

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for 
all waters of the Arkansas River beginning at mile marker 118.6 and 
ending at mile marker 119.6. The safety zone is necessary to protect 
persons, property, and infrastructure from potential damage and safety 
hazards associated with the demolition of the Broadway Bridge. This 
rulemaking would impose a speed restriction and prohibit persons and 
vessels from entering the safety zone area during certain operations 
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Memphis or a designated 
representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m. on October 1, 2016 through 10 
p.m. on November 1, 2016.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0885 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Petty Officer Todd Manow, Sector Lower Mississippi River 
Prevention Department, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 901-521-4813, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule. Although the Coast Guard received initial 
notification of this planned bridge demolition in February of the 
previous year, the dates of each phase of demolition were not finalized 
and submitted until August 29, 2016. Immediate action is needed to 
respond to potential safety hazards related to a bridge demolition on 
or over this navigable waterway. It is impracticable and contrary to 
the public interest to publish an NPRM because we must establish this 
safety zone by October 1, 2016.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30 
days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective 
date of this rule would be contrary to public interest because 
immediate action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards 
associated with demolition of the Broadway Bridge.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The COTP has determined that potential hazards associated with a 
bridge demolition starting October 1, 2016 will be a safety concern for 
anyone desiring to transit this section of the Arkansas River. This 
rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and infrastructure in the 
navigable waters within the safety zone while bridge demolition is 
occurring.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from 7 a.m. on October 1, 2016 
through 10 p.m. on November 1, 2016. The safety zone will cover all 
navigable waters within one half mile on either side of the Broadway 
Bridge. Vessels will be prohibited from entering the safety zone from 
30 minutes prior to, until 30 minutes after, any blasting or large-
scale removal operation that takes place on the Broadway Bridge; 
designated representatives will be on-scene to stop or reroute traffic 
during these evolutions. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter 
the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a 
designated representative. During the entire effective period of this 
safety zone, regardless of operations, all vessel traffic will be 
required to maintain slowest speeds for safe navigation; marker buoys 
will be placed informing waterway users of a no-wake zone. This safety 
zone is intended to protect personnel, vessels, and infrastructure in 
these navigable waters while the bridge is being demolished.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. 
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and 
Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size and 
location of the safety zone, a one-mile section of the Arkansas River 
in the vicinity of Little Rock, AR. Although in effect from October 1, 
2016 until November 1, 2016, traffic will only be excluded from this 
safety zone from 30 minutes before until 30 minutes after any blasting 
or large-scale removal operation that takes place on the Broadway 
Bridge. During periods of non-exclusion, vessel traffic will be allowed 
to transit at slowest speeds for safe navigation through this safety 
zone. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to Mariners 
via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone and the rule allows vessels 
to seek permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.

[[Page 65890]]

605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in 
this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves a month-long safety zone limiting vessel speed and 
intermittently prohibiting entry into a one-mile area of the Arkansas 
River adjacent to the Broadway Bridge during demolition operations. It 
is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of 
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental analysis 
checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical Exclusion 
Determination are available in the docket where indicated under 
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the 
discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Temporary Sec.  [thinsp]165.35T08-0885 is added to read as follows:


Sec.  [thinsp]165.35T08-0885   Safety Zone; Arkansas River; Little 
Rock, AR.

    (a) Location. All waters of the Arkansas River beginning at mile 
marker 118.6 and ending at mile marker 119.6 in the vicinity of Little 
Rock, AR.
    (b) Periods of enforcement. This temporary safety zone will be 
enforced from 7 a.m. on October 1, 2016 through 10 p.m. on November 1, 
2016.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  [thinsp]165.23 of this part, entry into this area during blasting 
or large-scale removal operations is prohibited unless authorized by 
the COTP or a designated representative. All persons and vessels 
permitted to deviate from the safety zone requirements, as well as 
enter the restricted area must transit at the slowest safe speed and 
comply with all lawful directions issued by the COTP or a designated 
representative.
    (2) Buoys marked ``No-Wake'' will be placed along the navigation 
channel while this safety zone is in effect.
    (3) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through this 
safety zone during prohibited entry periods must request permission 
from the COTP or a designated representative. They may be contacted on 
VHF Channel 16 or at 1-800-777-2784.
    (4) A ``designated representative'' of the COTP is any Coast Guard 
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer, or a Federal, State, or local 
law enforcement officer designated by the COTP to act on his behalf.
    (d) Informational broadcasts. The COTP Memphis or a designated 
representative will inform the public through broadcast notices to 
mariners of the enforcement period for the safety zone, as well as any 
changes in the dates and times of enforcement.


[[Page 65891]]


    Dated: September 20, 2016.
J.L. Adams,
Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, 
Memphis, Tennessee.
[FR Doc. 2016-23122 Filed 9-23-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

65890 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

605(b) that this rule will not have a Federal Government and Indian tribes, List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
significant economic impact on a or on the distribution of power and
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
substantial number of small entities. responsibilities between the Federal
While some owners or operators of (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
Government and Indian tribes. If you
vessels intending to transit the safety requirements, Security measures,
believe this rule has implications for
zone may be small entities, for the Waterways.
federalism or Indian tribes, please
reasons stated in section V.A above, this contact the person listed in the FOR For the reasons discussed in the
rule will not have a significant FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
economic impact on any vessel owner above. CFR part 165 as follows:
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
Business Regulatory Enforcement AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
we want to assist small entities in of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
understanding this rule. If the rule Federal agencies to assess the effects of continues to read as follows:
would affect your small business, their discretionary regulatory actions. In Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
organization, or governmental particular, the Act addresses actions 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
jurisdiction and you have questions that may result in the expenditure by a Department of Homeland Security Delegation
concerning its provisions or options for State, local, or tribal government, in the No. 0170.1.
compliance, please contact the person aggregate, or by the private sector of
■ 2. Temporary § 165.35T08–0885 is
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
added to read as follows:
CONTACT section. more in any one year. Though this rule
Small businesses may send comments will not result in such expenditure, we § 165.35T08–0885 Safety Zone; Arkansas
on the actions of Federal employees do discuss the effects of this rule River; Little Rock, AR.
who enforce, or otherwise determine elsewhere in this preamble. (a) Location. All waters of the
compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment Arkansas River beginning at mile
the Small Business and Agriculture marker 118.6 and ending at mile marker
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman We have analyzed this rule under 119.6 in the vicinity of Little Rock, AR.
and the Regional Small Business Department of Homeland Security (b) Periods of enforcement. This
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Management Directive 023–01 and temporary safety zone will be enforced
Ombudsman evaluates these actions Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, from 7 a.m. on October 1, 2016 through
annually and rates each agency’s which guide the Coast Guard in 10 p.m. on November 1, 2016.
responsiveness to small business. If you complying with the National (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
wish to comment on actions by Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 the general regulations in § 165.23 of
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have this part, entry into this area during
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The determined that this action is one of a blasting or large-scale removal
Coast Guard will not retaliate against category of actions that do not operations is prohibited unless
small entities that question or complain individually or cumulatively have a authorized by the COTP or a designated
about this rule or any policy or action significant effect on the human representative. All persons and vessels
of the Coast Guard. environment. This rule involves a permitted to deviate from the safety
C. Collection of Information month-long safety zone limiting vessel zone requirements, as well as enter the
speed and intermittently prohibiting restricted area must transit at the
This rule will not call for a new entry into a one-mile area of the slowest safe speed and comply with all
collection of information under the Arkansas River adjacent to the lawful directions issued by the COTP or
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 Broadway Bridge during demolition a designated representative.
U.S.C. 3501–3520). operations. It is categorically excluded (2) Buoys marked ‘‘No-Wake’’ will be
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal from further review under paragraph placed along the navigation channel
Governments 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant while this safety zone is in effect.
A rule has implications for federalism Instruction. An environmental analysis (3) Persons or vessels requiring entry
under Executive Order 13132, checklist supporting this determination into or passage through this safety zone
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct and a Categorical Exclusion during prohibited entry periods must
effect on the States, on the relationship Determination are available in the request permission from the COTP or a
between the national government and docket where indicated under designated representative. They may be
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or contacted on VHF Channel 16 or at 1–
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the information that may lead to the 800–777–2784.
various levels of government. We have discovery of a significant environmental (4) A ‘‘designated representative’’ of
analyzed this rule under that Order and impact from this rule. the COTP is any Coast Guard
have determined that it is consistent G. Protest Activities commissioned, warrant, or petty officer,
with the fundamental federalism or a Federal, State, or local law
principles and preemption requirements The Coast Guard respects the First enforcement officer designated by the
described in Executive Order 13132. Amendment rights of protesters. COTP to act on his behalf.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES

Also, this rule does not have tribal Protesters are asked to contact the (d) Informational broadcasts. The
implications under Executive Order person listed in the FOR FURTHER COTP Memphis or a designated
13175, Consultation and Coordination INFORMATION CONTACT section to representative will inform the public
with Indian Tribal Governments, coordinate protest activities so that your through broadcast notices to mariners of
because it does not have a substantial message can be received without the enforcement period for the safety
direct effect on one or more Indian jeopardizing the safety or security of zone, as well as any changes in the dates
tribes, on the relationship between the people, places or vessels. and times of enforcement.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:07 Sep 23, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM 26SER1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 65891

Dated: September 20, 2016. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ensued over a period of 60 days. The
J.L. Adams, Forest Service received 12 written
I. Background
Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, comments through 10 letters, and all
Acting Captain of the Port, Memphis, The Forest Service is issuing this final were considered in the development of
Tennessee. rule to implement section 8105 of the this final rule.
[FR Doc. 2016–23122 Filed 9–23–16; 8:45 am] 2008 Farm Bill (section 8105). Section This rule establishes Forest Service
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
8105 has also been codified in Title 25 policy for providing Indian tribes with
of the U.S. Code, chapter 32A—Cultural trees, portions of trees, or forest
and Heritage Cooperation Authority (25 products for traditional and cultural
U.S.C. 3055—Forest Products for purposes. Based on the comments
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Traditional and Cultural Purposes). received on the ID during formal
Forest Service Subject to certain statutory limitations, government-to-government
section 8105 allows the Secretary of consultation, and those received during
36 CFR Part 223 Agriculture to provide Indian tribes the proposed rulemaking, as well as the
with trees, portions of trees, or forest Agency’s experience using the ID to
RIN 0596–AD00 products for traditional and cultural implement section 8105 over the last 7
purposes. In this preamble to the final years, the Agency is now publishing this
Sale and Disposal of National Forest rule, the term ‘‘forest products’’ is used final rule.
System Timber; Forest Products for as a shorthand for ‘‘trees, portions of This final rule adds § 223.15 to 36
Traditional and Cultural Purposes trees, or forest products’’. Specifically, CFR part 223, subpart A. Section
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. section 8105(a) provides that the 223.15(a) authorizes Regional Foresters
ACTION: Final rule. Secretary may provide free of charge to or designated Forest Officers to provide
Indian tribes any trees, portions of trees, trees, portions of trees, or forest
SUMMARY: The USDA Forest Service is or forest products from National Forest products to Indian tribes free of charge
implementing regulations under the System land for traditional and cultural for traditional and cultural purposes.
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of purposes. Section 223.15(b) restates the 2008 Farm
2008 (hereinafter the ‘‘2008 Farm Bill’’). However, pursuant to section 8105(b), Bill’s statutory definitions of ‘‘Indian
This rule provides for the provision of Indian tribes are prohibited from using tribe’’ and ‘‘traditional and cultural
trees, portions of trees, or forest any trees, portions of trees, or forest purpose,’’ and includes the Forest
products from National Forest System products provided under section Services’ regulatory definition of ‘‘tribal
lands, free of charge, to federally 8105(a) for commercial purposes. While officials.’’
recognized Indian tribes (Indian tribes) the 2008 Farm Bill does not define Sections 223.15(c) and (d) describe
for traditional and cultural purposes. commercial purposes, it does define who can request trees, portions of trees,
This rule implements section 8105 of Indian tribe and traditional and cultural or forest products for traditional and
the 2008 Farm Bill. purpose. Section 8102(5) defines Indian cultural purposes, and where those
DATES: This rule is effective October 26,
tribe as any Indian or Alaska Native requests should be directed. Tribal
2016. tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, or officials should submit requests for
other community the name of which is trees, portions of trees, or forest
ADDRESSES: Information on this final included on a list published by the products to their local Forest Service
rule may be obtained via written request Secretary of the Interior pursuant to District Ranger’s office for routing to the
addressed to Director, Forest section 104 of the Federally Recognized appropriate designated authority. In
Management Staff, USDA Forest Indian Tribe List Act of 1994 (25 U.S.C. addition, tribal officials are encouraged
Service, Mail Stop 1103, 1400 479a–1). In addition, per section to explain their requests to the Regional
Independence Avenue SW., 8102(9), traditional and cultural Forester or designated Forest Officer,
Washington, DC 20250 or by email to purpose, with respect to a definable use, and if necessary, how the request fits a
FarmBillForestProductsRule@fs.fed.us. area, or practice, means that the use, traditional and cultural purpose.
The public may inspect comments area, or practice is identified by an A designated Forest Officer is an
previously received at the Office of the Indian tribe as traditional or cultural individual whom the Regional Forester
Director, Forest Management Staff, because of the long-established has granted written authority to provide
Sidney Yates Building, Third Floor SW significance or ceremonial nature of the products under § 223.15. Currently,
Wing, 201 14th Street SW., Washington, use, area, or practice to the Indian tribe. there is no limitation on the number of
DC or via the world wide web/Internet On December 2, 2009, the Forest requests or authorizations per unit of a
at http://www.fs.fed.us/ Service published an Interim Directive forest product or the number of requests
forestmanagement/traditional_cultural/ (ID) to the Forest Service Handbook or authorizations per Indian tribe. There
index.shtml. Visitors are encouraged to (FSH) 2409.18 to implement section is currently no limitation on the amount
call ahead to 202–205–1766 to facilitate 8105 of the 2008 Farm Bill. The ID was of trees, portions of trees, or forest
entry to the building. reissued, without change, four times products that can be requested at any
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe (effective March 8, 2011 (ID 2409.18– one time. However, Forest Officers
Reddan, Assistant Director, Forest 2011–1), June 7, 2012 (ID 2409.18– cannot grant materials in excess of the
Products, 202–557–6591 or Sharon 2012–2), December 6, 2013 (ID 2409.18– value limitations at § 223.15(e) in any
Nygaard-Scott, Forest Service, Forest 2013–3), and May 14, 2015 (ID 2409.18– given fiscal year.
Management Staff, 202–205–1766, 2015–1), and remains in effect until Section 223.15(f) explains that the
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES

during normal business hours. November 14, 2016. This final rule will Forest Service may condition or deny
Individuals who use telecommunication replace the Interim Directive, which requests for trees, portions of trees, or
devices for the deaf (TDD) may call the will be entered in FSH 2409.18, chapter forest products under § 223.15. Finally,
Federal Information Relay Service 80, section 82.5. § 223.15(g) provides that all decisions
(FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339 between 8 The proposed rule was published in made under § 223.15 must comply with
a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Standard Time, the Federal Register on July 31, 2014 the National Forest Management Act,
Monday through Friday. (79 FR 44327), and a comment period relevant land management plans, the

VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:07 Sep 23, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\26SER1.SGM 26SER1

Document Created: 2018-02-09 13:22:51
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 13:22:51

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 7 a.m. on October 1, 2016 through 10 p.m. on November 1, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Petty Officer Todd Manow, Sector Lower Mississippi River Prevention Department, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 901-521-4813, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 65889
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

81 FR 65889 - Safety Zone; Arkansas River, Little Rock, AR

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 186 (September 26, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard