81_FR_66220 81 FR 66034 - Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

81 FR 66034 - Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 186 (September 26, 2016)

Page Range66034-66035
FR Document2016-23058

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 186 (Monday, September 26, 2016) 
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 186 (Monday, September 26, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 66034-66035]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23058]



[[Page 66034]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Administration for Children and Families


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    Title: Evaluation of the Child Welfare Capacity Building 
Collaborative: Part Two.
    OMB No.: New Collection.
    Description: This new data collection is the second part of a 
larger data collection effort being conducted for the evaluation of the 
Child Welfare Capacity Building Collaborative. The first group of 
instruments has already been submitted for this evaluation. This notice 
details the second group of instruments that will be used for data 
collection as part of this evaluation. The Evaluation of the Child 
Welfare Capacity Building Collaborative is sponsored by the Children's 
Bureau, Administration for Children and Families of the U.S. Department 
of Health and Human Services. The Capacity Building Collaborative 
includes three centers (Center for States, Center for Tribes, Center 
for Courts) funded by the Children's Bureau to provide national child 
welfare expertise and evidence-informed training and technical 
assistance services to State, Tribal and Territorial public child 
welfare agencies and Court Improvement Programs (CIP). The Centers 
offer a wide array of services including, but not limited to: Web-based 
content and resources, product development and dissemination, self-
directed and group-based training, virtual learning and peer networking 
events, and tailored consultation and coaching. During the project 
period the Centers' services will be evaluated by both Center-specific 
evaluations and a Cross-Center Evaluation. The Center-specific 
evaluations are designed to collect data on Center-specific processes 
and outcomes. The Cross-Center Evaluation is designed to respond to a 
set of cross-cutting evaluation questions posed by the Children's 
Bureau. The Cross-Center Evaluation will examine: The extent to which 
key partners across and within the Centers are collaborating; whether 
the capacity building service interventions offered by the Centers are 
evaluable; the degree to which Centers follow common protocols; whether 
service interventions are delivered or performed as designed; how 
satisfied recipients are with the services received; how effective the 
service interventions were; which service approaches were most 
effective and under what conditions; and the costs of services.
    The Cross-Center Evaluation is utilizing a longitudinal mixed 
methods approach to evaluate the Centers' services as they develop and 
mature over the course of the study period. Multiple data collection 
strategies will be used to efficiently capture quantitative and 
qualitative data to enable analyses that address each evaluation 
question. Proposed Cross-Center Evaluation data sources for this effort 
include: (1) A capacity survey to capture perceived changes in 
organizational capacity after receiving Center services; (2) a tailored 
services satisfaction survey administered in conjunction with the 
capacity survey to capture satisfaction with tailored services; (3) a 
foundational assessment to capture contextual data regarding the 
organizational health and functioning of child welfare agencies and 
courts; (4) a follow-up survey that will examine short-term and 
intermediate outcomes among CIPs that receive different levels of 
tailored services following continuous quality improvement (CQI) 
workshops; and (5) a key informant survey and interview to examine how 
capacity building services are incorporated into state and tribal 
activities to support implementation of Public Law 113-183. Center-
specific data sources for this effort include (1) registration forms 
such as the webinar and learning management system (CapLEARN) 
registration forms and (2) service-specific feedback forms and 
interviews, such as the Center for States Tailored Services interviews 
and the Center for Courts Universal and Constituency Services survey.
    Respondents: Respondents of data collection instruments will 
include (1) child welfare agency staff and stakeholders who directly 
receive services that have been tailored to the needs of their 
jurisdiction and (2) CIP coordinators, CIP Directors, and other project 
staff. The proposed data collection will span three years.

                                             Annual Burden Estimates
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Number of    Average burden
                   Instrument                      Annual number   responses per     hours per     Total annual
                                                  of respondents    respondent       response      burden hours
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Capacity Survey.................................             462               1              .3          138.60
Tailored Services Satisfaction Survey...........             462               1            .083           38.35
Foundational Assessment Survey..................             277               1              .1            27.7
CQI Workshop Follow-Up Survey...................              48               2             .12           11.52
Public Law 113-183 Key Informant Survey.........              52               1             .26           13.52
Public Law 113-183 Key Informant Interview......               5               1               1               5
Center for Courts: Universal and Constituency                104               1             .41           42.64
 Services.......................................
Webinar Registration............................            4650               1             .03           139.5
Center for States: Tailored Services Interviews.              60               1               1              60
Center for States: Assessment and Work Planning              150               1             .25            37.5
 Survey.........................................
CapLEARN Registration...........................             600               1            .084            50.4
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 564.73.
    Additional Information: Copies of the proposed collection may be 
obtained by writing to the Administration for Children and Families, 
Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, 370 L'Enfant Promenade 
SW., Washington, DC 20447, Attn: OPRE Reports Clearance Officer. All 
requests should be identified by the title of the information 
collection. Email address: [email protected].
    OMB Comment: OMB is required to make a decision concerning the 
collection of information between 30 and 60 days after publication of 
this document in the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment is best 
assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of 
publication. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed 
information collection should be sent directly to the following: Office 
of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project, Fax: 202-395-
6974, Attn: Desk Officer for the

[[Page 66035]]

Administration for Children and Families.

Robert Sargis,
Reports Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2016-23058 Filed 9-23-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P

66034 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2016 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND content and resources, product effort include: (1) A capacity survey to HUMAN SERVICES development and dissemination, self- capture perceived changes in directed and group-based training, organizational capacity after receiving Administration for Children and virtual learning and peer networking Center services; (2) a tailored services Families events, and tailored consultation and satisfaction survey administered in coaching. During the project period the conjunction with the capacity survey to Submission for OMB Review; Centers’ services will be evaluated by capture satisfaction with tailored Comment Request both Center-specific evaluations and a services; (3) a foundational assessment Cross-Center Evaluation. The Center- to capture contextual data regarding the Title: Evaluation of the Child Welfare specific evaluations are designed to organizational health and functioning of Capacity Building Collaborative: Part collect data on Center-specific processes child welfare agencies and courts; (4) a Two. and outcomes. The Cross-Center follow-up survey that will examine OMB No.: New Collection. Evaluation is designed to respond to a Description: This new data collection short-term and intermediate outcomes set of cross-cutting evaluation questions among CIPs that receive different levels is the second part of a larger data posed by the Children’s Bureau. The collection effort being conducted for the of tailored services following Cross-Center Evaluation will examine: continuous quality improvement (CQI) evaluation of the Child Welfare Capacity The extent to which key partners across Building Collaborative. The first group workshops; and (5) a key informant and within the Centers are survey and interview to examine how of instruments has already been collaborating; whether the capacity submitted for this evaluation. This capacity building services are building service interventions offered by incorporated into state and tribal notice details the second group of the Centers are evaluable; the degree to instruments that will be used for data activities to support implementation of which Centers follow common Public Law 113–183. Center-specific collection as part of this evaluation. The protocols; whether service interventions Evaluation of the Child Welfare data sources for this effort include (1) are delivered or performed as designed; Capacity Building Collaborative is registration forms such as the webinar how satisfied recipients are with the sponsored by the Children’s Bureau, and learning management system services received; how effective the Administration for Children and (CapLEARN) registration forms and (2) service interventions were; which Families of the U.S. Department of service-specific feedback forms and service approaches were most effective Health and Human Services. The interviews, such as the Center for States and under what conditions; and the Capacity Building Collaborative Tailored Services interviews and the costs of services. includes three centers (Center for States, The Cross-Center Evaluation is Center for Courts Universal and Center for Tribes, Center for Courts) utilizing a longitudinal mixed methods Constituency Services survey. funded by the Children’s Bureau to approach to evaluate the Centers’ Respondents: Respondents of data provide national child welfare expertise services as they develop and mature collection instruments will include (1) and evidence-informed training and over the course of the study period. child welfare agency staff and technical assistance services to State, Multiple data collection strategies will stakeholders who directly receive Tribal and Territorial public child be used to efficiently capture services that have been tailored to the welfare agencies and Court quantitative and qualitative data to needs of their jurisdiction and (2) CIP Improvement Programs (CIP). The enable analyses that address each coordinators, CIP Directors, and other Centers offer a wide array of services evaluation question. Proposed Cross- project staff. The proposed data including, but not limited to: Web-based Center Evaluation data sources for this collection will span three years. ANNUAL BURDEN ESTIMATES Annual Number of Average Total annual Instrument number of responses per burden hours burden hours respondents respondent per response Capacity Survey ............................................................................................... 462 1 .3 138.60 Tailored Services Satisfaction Survey ............................................................. 462 1 .083 38.35 Foundational Assessment Survey ................................................................... 277 1 .1 27.7 CQI Workshop Follow-Up Survey .................................................................... 48 2 .12 11.52 Public Law 113–183 Key Informant Survey .................................................... 52 1 .26 13.52 Public Law 113–183 Key Informant Interview ................................................. 5 1 1 5 Center for Courts: Universal and Constituency Services ................................ 104 1 .41 42.64 Webinar Registration ....................................................................................... 4650 1 .03 139.5 Center for States: Tailored Services Interviews .............................................. 60 1 1 60 Center for States: Assessment and Work Planning Survey ........................... 150 1 .25 37.5 CapLEARN Registration .................................................................................. 600 1 .084 50.4 Estimated Total Annual Burden Clearance Officer. All requests should Therefore, a comment is best assured of Hours: 564.73. be identified by the title of the having its full effect if OMB receives it mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES Additional Information: Copies of the information collection. Email address: within 30 days of publication. Written proposed collection may be obtained by OPREinfocollection@acf.hhs.gov. comments and recommendations for the writing to the Administration for OMB Comment: OMB is required to proposed information collection should Children and Families, Office of make a decision concerning the be sent directly to the following: Office Planning, Research and Evaluation, 370 collection of information between 30 of Management and Budget, Paperwork L’Enfant Promenade SW., Washington, and 60 days after publication of this Reduction Project, Fax: 202–395–6974, DC 20447, Attn: OPRE Reports document in the Federal Register. Attn: Desk Officer for the VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:40 Sep 23, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM 26SEN1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 186 / Monday, September 26, 2016 / Notices 66035 Administration for Children and 1503), Silver Spring, MD 20993. http://www.regulations.gov or at the Families. Entrance for the public meeting Division of Dockets Management participants (non-FDA employees) is between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday Robert Sargis, through Building 1, where routine through Friday. Reports Clearance Officer. security check procedures will be • Confidential Submissions—To [FR Doc. 2016–23058 Filed 9–23–16; 8:45 am] performed. For parking and security submit a comment with confidential BILLING CODE P information, refer to http:// information that you do not wish to be www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/Workingat made publicly available, submit your FDA/BuildingsandFacilities/WhiteOak comments only as a written/paper DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND CampusInformation/ucm241740.htm. submission. You should submit two HUMAN SERVICES You may submit comments as copies total. One copy will include the follows: information you claim to be confidential Food and Drug Administration with a heading or cover note that states Electronic Submissions [Docket No. FDA–2012–N–0882] ‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS Submit electronic comments in the CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The Generic Drug User Fees; Public following way: Agency will review this copy, including Meeting; Request for Comments • Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// the claimed confidential information, in www.regulations.gov. Follow the its consideration of comments. The AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, instructions for submitting comments. second copy, which will have the HHS. Comments submitted electronically, claimed confidential information ACTION: Notice of public meeting; including attachments, to http:// request for comments. redacted/blacked out, will be available www.regulations.gov will be posted to for public viewing and posted on http:// SUMMARY: The Food and Drug the docket unchanged. Because your www.regulations.gov. Submit both Administration (FDA) is announcing a comment will be made public, you are copies to the Division of Dockets public meeting to discuss proposed solely responsible for ensuring that your Management. If you do not wish your recommendations for the comment does not include any name and contact information to be reauthorization of the Generic Drug User confidential information that you or a made publicly available, you can Fee Amendments of 2012 (GDUFA), third party may not wish to be posted, provide this information on the cover which authorizes FDA to collect fees such as medical information, your or sheet and not in the body of your and use them for the review of certain anyone else’s Social Security number, or comments and you must identify this generic human drug applications and confidential business information, such information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any associated Type II active pharmaceutical as a manufacturing process. Please note information marked as ‘‘confidential’’ ingredient (API) drug master files that if you include your name, contact will not be disclosed except in (DMFs), and for conducting associated information, or other information that accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other inspections for fiscal years (FYs) 2018 identifies you in the body of your applicable disclosure law. For more through 2022. The legislative authority comments, that information will be information about FDA’s posting of for GDUFA expires at the end of posted on http://www.regulations.gov. comments to public dockets, see 80 FR September 2017. At that time, new • If you want to submit a comment 56469, September 18, 2015, or access legislation will be required for FDA to with confidential information that you the information at: http://www.fda.gov/ continue to collect generic drug user do not wish to be made available to the regulatoryinformation/dockets/ fees for future fiscal years. Following public, submit the comment as a default.htm. discussions with the regulated industry written/paper submission and in the Docket: For access to the docket to and periodic consultations with public manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper read background documents or the stakeholders, the Federal Food, Drug, Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’). electronic and written/paper comments and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) Written/Paper Submissions received, go to http:// directs FDA to present the www.regulations.gov and insert the Submit written/paper submissions as recommendations to the relevant docket number, found in brackets in the follows: Congressional committees, publish the • Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for heading of this document, into the recommendations for the reauthorized written/paper submissions): Division of ‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts program in the Federal Register, Dockets Management (HFA–305), Food and/or go to the Division of Dockets provide for a period of 30 days for the and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. public to provide written comments on Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. such recommendations, and hold a • For written/paper comments FDA will post the agenda meeting at which the public may submitted to the Division of Dockets approximately 5 days before the meeting present its views on such Management, FDA will post your at www.fda.gov/gdufa. recommendations. FDA will then comment, as well as any attachments, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: consider such public views and except for information submitted, Derek Griffing, Center for Drug comments and revise such marked and identified, as confidential, Evaluation and Research, Food and recommendations as necessary. if submitted as detailed in Drug Administration, 10903 New DATES: The public meeting will be held ‘‘Instructions.’’ Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 75, Rm. 1673, on October 21, 2016, from 9 a.m. to 5 Instructions: All submissions received Silver Spring, MD 20993, 240–402– mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES p.m. Submit electronic or written must include the Docket No. FDA– 6980, email: GenericDrugPolicy@ comments to the public docket by 2012–N–0882 for ‘‘Generic Drug User fda.hhs.gov. November 7, 2016. Fees; Public Meeting; Request for SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Comments.’’ Received comments will be the FDA White Oak Campus, 10903 placed in the docket and, except for I. Introduction New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31 those submitted as ‘‘Confidential FDA is announcing a public meeting Conference Center, the Great Room (Rm. Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at to discuss proposed recommendations VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:40 Sep 23, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26SEN1.SGM 26SEN1


Document Created: 2018-02-09 13:22:30
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 13:22:30
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation81 FR 66034 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR