81 FR 66189 - Extension of Deadline for Action on the August 2016 Section 126 Petition From Delaware
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 187 (September 27, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 187 (September 27, 2016)
| Page Range | 66189-66191 | |
| FR Document | 2016-23155 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 187 (Tuesday, September 27, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 66189-66191] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-23155] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0509; FRL-9952-97-OAR] Extension of Deadline for Action on the August 2016 Section 126 Petition From Delaware AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: In this action, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is determining that 60 days is insufficient time to complete the technical and other analyses and public notice-and-comment process required for our review of a petition submitted by the state of Delaware pursuant to section 126 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The petition requests that the EPA make a finding that Harrison Power Station, located near Haywood, Harrison County, West Virginia, emits air pollution that significantly contributes to nonattainment and interferes with maintenance of the 2008 and 2015 ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) in the state of Delaware. Under section 307(d)(10) of CAA, the EPA is authorized to grant a time extension for responding to a petition if the EPA determines that the extension is necessary to afford the public, and the agency, adequate opportunity to carry out the purposes of the section 307(d) notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements. By this action, the EPA is making that determination. The EPA is therefore extending the deadline for acting on the petition to no later than April 7, 2017. DATES: This final rule is effective on September 27, 2016. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0509. All documents in the docket are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available electronically through http://www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Gobeail McKinley, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (C504-04), U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, telephone number (919) 541-5246, email: mckinley.gobeail@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION I. Background and Legal Requirements for Interstate Air Pollution This is a procedural action to extend the deadline for the EPA to respond to a petition from the state of Delaware filed pursuant to CAA section 126(b). The EPA received the petition on August 8, 2016. The petition requests that the EPA make a finding under section 126(b) of the CAA that the Harrison Power Station, located near Haywood, Harrison County, West Virginia, is operating in a manner that emits air pollutants in violation of the provisions of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of the CAA with respect to the 2008 and 2015 ozone NAAQS. Section 126(b) of the CAA authorizes states to petition the EPA to find that a major source or group of stationary sources in upwind states emits or would emit any air pollutant in violation of the prohibition of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) \1\ by contributing significantly to nonattainment or maintenance problems in downwind states. Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of the CAA prohibits emissions of any air pollutant in amounts which will contribute significantly to nonattainment in, or interfere with maintenance by, any other state with respect to any NAAQS. The petition asserts that emissions from Harrison Power Station's three electric generating units emit air pollutants in violation of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with respect to the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, set at 0.075 parts per million [[Page 66190]] (ppm), and the revised 2015 8-hour ozone NAAQS, set at 0.070 ppm.\2\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The text of CAA section 126 codified in the United States Code cross references CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) instead of CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i). The courts have confirmed that this is a scrivener's error and the correct cross reference is to CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i). See Appalachian Power Co. v. EPA, 249 F.3d 1032, 1040-44 (D.C. Cir. 2001). \2\ On October 1, 2015, the EPA strengthened the ground-level ozone NAAQS, based on extensive scientific evidence about ozone's effects on public health and welfare. See 80 FR 65291 (October 26, 2015). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to CAA section 126(b), the EPA must make the finding requested in the petition, or must deny the petition within 60 days of its receipt. Under CAA section 126(c), any existing sources for which the EPA makes the requested finding must cease operations within 3 months of the finding, except that the source may continue to operate if it complies with emission limitations and compliance schedules (containing increments of progress) that the EPA may provide to bring about compliance with the applicable requirements as expeditiously as practical but no later than 3 years from the date of the finding. CAA section 126(b) further provides that the EPA must hold a public hearing on the petition. The EPA's action under section 126 is also subject to the procedural requirements of CAA section 307(d). See CAA section 307(d)(1)(N). One of these requirements is notice-and-comment rulemaking, under section 307(d)(3)-(6). In addition, CAA section 307(d)(10) provides for a time extension, under certain circumstances, for a rulemaking subject to CAA section 307(d). Specifically, CAA section 307(d)(10) provides: Each statutory deadline for promulgation of rules to which this subsection applies which requires promulgation less than six months after date of proposal may be extended to not more than six months after date of proposal by the Administrator upon a determination that such extension is necessary to afford the public, and the agency, adequate opportunity to carry out the purposes of the subsection. CAA section 307(d)(10) may be applied to section 126 rulemakings because the 60-day time limit under CAA section 126(b) necessarily limits the period for promulgation of a final rule after proposal to less than 6 months. II. Final Rule A. Rule In accordance with CAA section 307(d)(10), the EPA is determining that the 60-day period afforded by CAA section 126(b) for responding to the petition from the state of Delaware is not adequate to allow the public and the agency the opportunity to carry out the purposes of CAA section 307(d). Specifically, the 60-day period is insufficient for the EPA to complete the necessary technical review, develop an adequate proposal, and allow time for notice and comment, including an opportunity for public hearing, on a proposed finding regarding whether the Harrison Power Plant identified in the CAA section 126 petition contributes significantly to nonattainment or interferes with maintenance of the 2008 ozone NAAQS or the 2015 ozone NAAQS in Delaware. Moreover, the 60-day period is insufficient for the EPA to review and develop response to any public comments on a proposed finding, or testimony supplied at a public hearing, and to develop and promulgate a final finding in response to the petition. The EPA is in the process of determining an appropriate schedule for action on the CAA section 126 petition. This schedule must afford the EPA adequate time to prepare a proposal that clearly elucidates the issues to facilitate public comment, and must provide adequate time for the public to comment and for the EPA to review and develop responses to those comments prior to issuing the final rule. As a result of this extension, the deadline for the EPA to act on the petition is April 7, 2017. B. Notice and Comment Under the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) This document is a final agency action, but may not be subject to the notice-and-comment requirements of the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553(b). The EPA believes that, because of the limited time provided to make a determination, the deadline for action on the CAA section 126 petition should be extended. Congress may not have intended such a determination to be subject to notice-and-comment rulemaking. However, to the extent that this determination otherwise would require notice and opportunity for public comment, there is good cause within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B) not to apply those requirements here. Providing for notice and comment would be impracticable because of the limited time provided for making this determination, and would be contrary to the public interest because it would divert agency resources from the substantive review of the CAA section 126 petition. C. Effective Date Under the APA This action is effective on September 27, 2016. Under the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), agency rulemaking may take effect before 30 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register if the agency has good cause to mandate an earlier effective date. This action--a deadline extension--must take effect immediately because its purpose is to extend by 6 months the deadline for action on the petition. As discussed earlier, the EPA intends to use the 6-month extension period to develop a proposal on the petition and provide time for public comment before issuing the final rule. It would not be possible for the EPA to complete the required notice and comment and public hearing process within the original 60-day period noted in the statute. These reasons support an immediate effective date. III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. Executive Orders 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory This action is exempt from review by the Office of Management and Budget because it simply extends the date for the EPA to take action on a petition. B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) This action does not impose an information collection burden under the PRA. This good cause final action simply extends the date for the EPA to take action on a petition and does not impose any new obligations or enforceable duties on any state, local or tribal governments or the private sector. It does not contain any recordkeeping or reporting requirements. C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) This action is not subject to the RFA. The RFA applies only to rules subject to notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements under the APA, 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other statute. This rule is not subject to notice-and-comment requirements because the agency has invoked the APA ``good cause'' exemption under 5 U.S.C. 553(b). D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) This action does not contain any unfunded mandate of $100 million or more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state, local or tribal governments or the private sector. E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. [[Page 66191]] F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175. This good cause final action simply extends the date for the EPA to take action on a petition. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this rule. G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health and Safety Risks The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental health risk or safety risk. H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) This rulemaking does not involve technical standards. J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations The EPA believes that this action is not subject to Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) because it does not establish an environmental health or safety standard. This good cause final action simply extends the date for the EPA to take action on a petition and does not have any impact on human health or the environment. K. Congressional Review Act (CRA) This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The CRA allows the issuing agency to make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the agency makes a good cause finding that notice-and-comment rulemaking procedures are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest (5 U.S.C. 808(2)). The EPA has made a good cause finding for this rule as discussed in Section II.B of this document, including the basis for that finding. IV. Statutory Authority The statutory authority for this action is provided by sections 110, 126 and 307 of the CAA as amended (42 U.S.C. 7410, 7426 and 7607). V. Judicial Review Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, judicial review of this final rule is available only by the filing of a petition for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November 28, 2016. Under section 307(b)(2) of the CAA, the requirements that are the subject of this final rule may not be challenged later in civil or criminal proceedings brought by us to enforce these requirements. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Administrative practices and procedures, Air pollution control, Electric utilities, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone. Dated: September 19, 2016. Gina McCarthy, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2016-23155 Filed 9-26-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 66189
The revisions and additions read as (12) Establish guidance for when an e.g., Confidential Business Information
follows: Expedited Transfer has been requested or other information whose disclosure is
in accordance with DoD Instruction restricted by statute. Certain other
§ 103.5 Responsibilities. 6495.02. material, such as copyrighted material,
(a) * * * * * * * * is not placed on the Internet and will be
(6) Oversee the DoD Sexual Assault publicly available only in hard copy
Prevention and Response Office Dated: September 7, 2016.
Patricia L. Toppings, form. Publicly available docket
(SAPRO). Serving as the DoD single materials are available electronically
point of authority, accountability, and OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense. through http://www.regulations.gov.
oversight for the SAPR program, SAPRO
provides recommendations to the [FR Doc. 2016–21875 Filed 9–26–16; 8:45 am] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
USD(P&R) on the issue of DoD sexual BILLING CODE 5001–06–P Gobeail McKinley, Office of Air Quality
assault policy matters on prevention, Planning and Standards (C504–04), U.S.
response, and oversight. The SAPRO EPA, Research Triangle Park, North
Director will be appointed from among ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Carolina 27709, telephone number (919)
general or flag officers of the Military AGENCY 541–5246, email: mckinley.gobeail@
Services or DoD employees in a epa.gov.
comparable Senior Executive Service 40 CFR Part 52
position in accordance with Public Law [EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0509; FRL–9952–97– SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
112–81 . The SAPRO Director is OAR]
I. Background and Legal Requirements
responsible for:
Extension of Deadline for Action on for Interstate Air Pollution
* * * * *
(vi) Overseeing development of the August 2016 Section 126 Petition This is a procedural action to extend
strategic program guidance and joint From Delaware
the deadline for the EPA to respond to
planning objectives for resources in AGENCY: Environmental Protection a petition from the state of Delaware
support of the SAPR Program, and Agency (EPA). filed pursuant to CAA section 126(b).
making recommendations on ACTION: Final rule. The EPA received the petition on
modifications to policy, law, and August 8, 2016. The petition requests
regulations needed to ensure the SUMMARY: In this action, the that the EPA make a finding under
continuing availability of such resources Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) section 126(b) of the CAA that the
(Pub. L. 113–66). is determining that 60 days is Harrison Power Station, located near
* * * * * insufficient time to complete the Haywood, Harrison County, West
(f) * * * technical and other analyses and public
Virginia, is operating in a manner that
(5) Align Service prevention strategies notice-and-comment process required
emits air pollutants in violation of the
with the DoD Sexual Assault Prevention for our review of a petition submitted by
provisions of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of
Strategy. the state of Delaware pursuant to section
126 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The the CAA with respect to the 2008 and
* * * * * petition requests that the EPA make a 2015 ozone NAAQS.
(12) Submit required data to DSAID. finding that Harrison Power Station, Section 126(b) of the CAA authorizes
Require confirmation that a multi- located near Haywood, Harrison states to petition the EPA to find that a
disciplinary case management group County, West Virginia, emits air major source or group of stationary
(CMG) tracks each open Unrestricted pollution that significantly contributes sources in upwind states emits or would
Report, is chaired by the installation to nonattainment and interferes with emit any air pollutant in violation of the
commander (or the deputy installation maintenance of the 2008 and 2015 prohibition of CAA section
commander), and that CMG meetings ozone national ambient air quality 110(a)(2)(D)(i) 1 by contributing
are held monthly for reviewing all standards (NAAQS) in the state of significantly to nonattainment or
Unrestricted Reports of sexual assaults Delaware. Under section 307(d)(10) of
in accordance with DoD Instruction maintenance problems in downwind
CAA, the EPA is authorized to grant a states. Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) of the
6495.02. time extension for responding to a CAA prohibits emissions of any air
* * * * * petition if the EPA determines that the pollutant in amounts which will
(17) Require the installation SARC extension is necessary to afford the contribute significantly to
and the installation FAP staff to public, and the agency, adequate nonattainment in, or interfere with
coordinate together when a sexual opportunity to carry out the purposes of maintenance by, any other state with
assault occurs as a result of domestic the section 307(d) notice-and-comment
abuse or domestic violence or involves respect to any NAAQS. The petition
rulemaking requirements. By this asserts that emissions from Harrison
child abuse to ensure the victim is action, the EPA is making that
directed to FAP. Power Station’s three electric generating
determination. The EPA is therefore units emit air pollutants in violation of
* * * * * extending the deadline for acting on the
CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I) with
(g) On behalf and with the approval petition to no later than April 7, 2017.
respect to the 2008 8-hour ozone
of the Secretaries of the Army and Air DATES: This final rule is effective on
NAAQS, set at 0.075 parts per million
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Force, and in coordination with DoD September 27, 2016.
SAPRO and the State Adjutants General, ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a 1 The text of CAA section 126 codified in the
the Chief, NGB establishes and docket for this action under Docket ID United States Code cross references CAA section
implements SAPR policy and No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0509. All 110(a)(2)(D)(ii) instead of CAA section
procedures for National Guard members documents in the docket are listed on 110(a)(2)(D)(i). The courts have confirmed that this
on duty pursuant to Title 32, U.S.C. is a scrivener’s error and the correct cross reference
the http://www.regulations.gov Web is to CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i). See Appalachian
* * * * * site. Although listed in the index, some Power Co. v. EPA, 249 F.3d 1032, 1040–44 (D.C. Cir.
(i) * * * information is not publicly available, 2001).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:16 Sep 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27SER1.SGM 27SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_66376/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 187 / Tuesday, September 27, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 66191
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation document, including the basis for that ‘‘Medication Assisted Treatment for
and Coordination With Indian Tribal finding. Opioid Use Disorders,’’ published in the
Governments Federal Register on July 8, 2016.
IV. Statutory Authority
This action does not have tribal DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
implications, as specified in Executive The statutory authority for this action effective on October 27, 2016.
Order 13175. This good cause final is provided by sections 110, 126 and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
action simply extends the date for the 307 of the CAA as amended (42 U.S.C. Jinhee Lee, Pharm.D., Public Health
EPA to take action on a petition. Thus, 7410, 7426 and 7607). Advisor, Center for Substance Abuse
Executive Order 13175 does not apply V. Judicial Review Treatment, 240–276–2700
to this rule. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of judicial review of this final rule is Electronic Access
Children From Environmental Health available only by the filing of a petition This Federal Register document is
and Safety Risks for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals also available from the Federal Register
The EPA interprets Executive Order for the appropriate circuit by November online database through Federal Digital
13045 as applying only to those 28, 2016. Under section 307(b)(2) of the System (FDsys), a service of the U.S.
regulatory actions that concern CAA, the requirements that are the Government Printing Office. This
environmental health or safety risks that subject of this final rule may not be database can be accessed via the
the EPA has reason to believe may challenged later in civil or criminal Internet at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys.
disproportionately affect children, per proceedings brought by us to enforce
these requirements. I. Background
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 On July 8, 2016, HHS issued a final
Executive Order. This action is not rule entitled ‘‘Medication Assisted
subject to Executive Order 13045 Environmental protection, Treatment for Opioid Use Disorders’’ in
because it does not concern an Administrative practices and the Federal Register (81 FR 44712). That
environmental health risk or safety risk. procedures, Air pollution control, final rule increases access to
Electric utilities, Incorporation by medication-assisted treatment (MAT)
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That reference, Intergovernmental relations, with covered medications,1 in an office-
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone. based setting, by allowing eligible
Distribution or Use physicians to request approval to treat
Dated: September 19, 2016.
This action is not subject to Executive Gina McCarthy, up to 275 patients if certain conditions
Order 13211 because it is not a Administrator. are met. The final rule also includes
significant regulatory action under requirements to help ensure that
[FR Doc. 2016–23155 Filed 9–26–16; 8:45 am]
Executive Order 12866. patients receive the full array of services
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
I. National Technology Transfer and that comprise evidence-based MAT and
Advancement Act (NTTAA) minimize the risk that the medications
provided for treatment are misused or
This rulemaking does not involve DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND diverted. HHS issued a supplemental
technical standards. HUMAN SERVICES Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal (SNPRM) along with the final rule,
42 CFR Part 8
Actions To Address Environmental which included reporting requirements
Justice in Minority Populations and RIN 0930–AA22 for practitioners who increase their
Low-Income Populations patient limit to 275.
Medication Assisted Treatment for
The EPA believes that this action is Opioid Use Disorders Reporting A. Regulatory History
not subject to Executive Order 12898 (59 Requirements On March 30, 2016, HHS issued a
FR 7629, February 16, 1994) because it Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
does not establish an environmental AGENCY: Substance Abuse and Mental ‘‘Medication Assisted Treatment for
health or safety standard. This good Health Services Administration Opioid Use Disorders.’’ On July 8, 2016,
cause final action simply extends the (SAMHSA), HHS. HHS issued a final rule which finalized
date for the EPA to take action on a ACTION: Final rule. the regulation with the exception of
petition and does not have any impact sections relating to the requirement to
on human health or the environment. SUMMARY: This final rule outlines provide reports to SAMHSA (§ 8.630(b))
annual reporting requirements for and the reporting requirements
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA) practitioners who are authorized to treat (§ 8.635). Also on July 8, 2016, HHS
This action is subject to the CRA, and up to 275 patients with covered published a Supplemental Notice of
the EPA will submit a rule report to medications in an office-based setting. Proposed Rulemaking (SNPRM) in the
each House of the Congress and to the This final rule will require practitioners Federal Register which proposed
Comptroller General of the United to provide information on their annual reporting requirements for practitioners
States. The CRA allows the issuing caseload of patients by month, the whose Request for Patient Limit
agency to make a rule effective sooner number of patients provided behavioral Increase is approved under Section
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
than otherwise provided by the CRA if health services and referred to 8.625. The purpose of the reporting
the agency makes a good cause finding behavioral health services, and the requirements is to help HHS assess
that notice-and-comment rulemaking features of the practitioner’s diversion practitioner compliance with the
procedures are impracticable, control plan. These reporting additional responsibilities of
unnecessary or contrary to the public requirements will help the Department
interest (5 U.S.C. 808(2)). The EPA has of Health and Human Services (HHS) 1 Covered medications means the drugs or
made a good cause finding for this rule ensure compliance with the combination of drugs that are covered under 21
as discussed in Section II.B of this requirements of the final rule, U.S.C. 823(g)(2)(C).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:16 Sep 26, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27SER1.SGM 27SER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_66376/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-09-27 01:19:27
Document Modified: 2016-09-27 01:19:27
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This final rule is effective on September 27, 2016. | |
| Contact | Ms. Gobeail McKinley, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (C504-04), U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709, telephone number (919) 541-5246, email: [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 66189 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Administrative Practices and Procedures; Air Pollution Control; Electric Utilities; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Nitrogen Oxides and Ozone |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR