81 FR 66530 - Safety Zone; Main Branch of the Chicago River, Chicago, IL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 188 (September 28, 2016)

Page Range		66530-66532
FR Document		2016-23318

The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the Main Branch of the Chicago River, Chicago, IL. This action is necessary and intended to ensure safety of life on the navigable waters of the United States immediately prior to, during, and after the filming of a motion picture from a low flying helicopter. Entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 188 (Wednesday, September 28, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 188 (Wednesday, September 28, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 66530-66532]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23318]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0883]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Main Branch of the Chicago River, Chicago, IL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the 
Main Branch of the Chicago River, Chicago, IL. This action is necessary 
and intended to ensure safety of life on the navigable waters of the 
United States immediately prior to, during, and after the filming of a 
motion picture from a low flying helicopter. Entry of vessels or 
persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by 
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan.

[[Page 66531]]


DATES: This rule will be effective from 6 p.m. on October 1, 2016 to 11 
p.m. on October 2, 2016.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0883 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule, 
call or email LT Lindsay Cook, Marine Safety Unit Chicago, U.S. Coast 
Guard; telephone (630) 986-2155, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable. The 
final details for this event were not known to the Coast Guard until 
there was insufficient time remaining before the event to publish a 
NPRM. Thus, delaying the effective date of this rule to wait for a 
comment period to run would be impracticable because it would inhibit 
the Coast Guard's ability to protect the public and vessels from the 
hazards associated with the filming from a low flying helicopter on 
October 1, 2016, or an alternate date of October 2, 2016.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for making this temporary rule 
effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. 
For the same reasons discussed in the preceding paragraph, waiting for 
a 30 day notice period to run would be impracticable.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's authority to 
establish safety zones: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 160.5; 
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
    On October 1, 2016 or an alternate date of October 2, 2016, filming 
from a low flying helicopter will take place on the Main Branch of the 
Chicago River between the Franklin-Orleans Street Highway Bridge and 
the Michigan Avenue Highway Bridge in Chicago, IL. The Captain of the 
Port Lake Michigan has determined that the filming from a low flying 
helicopter will pose a significant risk to public safety and property. 
Such hazards include rotor turbulence, strong gusts of air, and close 
proximity of any vessel on the Chicago River.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    With the aforementioned hazards in mind, the Captain of the Port 
Lake Michigan has determined that this temporary safety zone is 
necessary to ensure the safety of the public during the filming from a 
low flying helicopter on the Main Branch of the Chicago River. This 
safety zone will be enforced intermittently from 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. on 
October 1, 2016, or an alternate date of October 2, 2016. This zone 
will encompass all waters of the Main Branch of the Chicago River 
between the Franklin-Orleans Street Highway Bridge and the Michigan 
Avenue Highway Bridge in Chicago, IL.
    Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety zone is 
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, 
or a designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or a 
designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive order 12866. 
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and 
Budget.
    We conclude that this rule is not a significant regulatory action 
because we anticipate that it will have minimal impact on the economy, 
will not interfere with other agencies, will not adversely alter the 
budget of any grant or loan recipients, and will not raise any novel 
legal or policy issues. The safety zone created by this rule will be 
relatively small and enforced intermittently on October 1, 2016, or an 
alternate date of October 2, 2016 from 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. Under certain 
conditions, moreover, vessels may still transit through the safety zone 
when permitted by the Captain of the Port.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered the impact of this temporary rule on small entities. This 
rule will affect the following entities, some of which might be small 
entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit on a 
portion of the Main Branch of the Chicago River on October 1, 2016, or 
an alternate date of October 2, 2016 from 6 p.m. to 11 p.m.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities for the reasons cited in the 
Regulatory Planning and Review section. Additionally, before the 
enforcement of the zone, we will issue local Broadcast Notice to 
Mariners and Public Notice of Safety Zone so vessel owners and 
operators can plan accordingly.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person

[[Page 66532]]

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves the establishment of a safety zone for filming from a low 
flying helicopter on the Main Branch of the Chicago River in Chicago, 
IL. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 
34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental 
analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical 
Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated 
under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to 
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0883 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0883  Safety Zone; Main Branch of the Chicago River, 
Chicago, IL.

    (a) Location. All waters of the Main Branch of the Chicago River 
between the Franklin-Orleans Street Highway Bridge and the Michigan 
Avenue Highway Bridge.
    (b) Enforcement Period. This rule will be enforced intermittently 
on October 1, 2016 from 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. or an alternate date of 
October 2, 2016 from 6 p.m. to 11 p.m.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in 
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within 
this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the 
Port Lake Michigan or a designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may 
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or a designated 
on-scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port Lake 
Michigan is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who 
has been designated by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan to act on 
his or her behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety 
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port 
Lake Michigan or an on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF 
Channel 16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in 
the safety zone must comply with all directions given to them by the 
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, or an on-scene representative.

    Dated: September 21, 2016.
A.B. Cocanour,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. 2016-23318 Filed 9-27-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

66530 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

percent cap on administrative expenses III. Procedural Requirements For the reasons set forth herein, the
will be applied. Specifically, Treasury Department of the Treasury amends 31
understands that the Council A. Regulatory Flexibility Act CFR part 34 to read as follows:
anticipated its annual administrative Because no notice of proposed
expenses would remain relatively PART 34—RESOURCES AND
rulemaking is required, the provisions
constant, while the amount of funds ECOSYSTEMS SUSTAINABILITY,
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
received and transferred by the Council TOURIST OPPORTUNITIES, AND
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply.
for projects undertaken by its members REVIVED ECONOMIES OF THE GULF
may vary considerably from one year to B. Regulatory Planning and Review COAST STATES
the next, depending on the Council’s (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
■ 1. The authority citation for part 34
funded priorities list. The Council also
The amendment to the regulation is a continues to read as follows:
anticipated that its members would seek
to fund large-scale projects under the significant regulatory action as defined Authority: 31 U.S.C. 301; 31 U.S.C. 321; 33
Comprehensive Plan Component, but in Executive Order 12866, as U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
anticipated that such large-scale projects supplemented by Executive Order ■ 2. Revise paragraph (b) of § 34.204 to
would occur in later years after 13563. Accordingly, it has been read as follows:
sufficient civil penalties had been reviewed by the Office of Management
deposited into the trust fund. Treasury and Budget. § 34.204 Limitations on administrative
costs and administrative expenses.
supports the Council’s goal of restoring C. Administrative Procedure Act
and protecting the Gulf Coast region * * * * *
under the Comprehensive Plan The Administrative Procedure Act (5 (b) Of the amounts received by the
Component, and is amending section U.S.C. 551 et seq.) (APA) provides that Council under the Comprehensive Plan
34.204(b), with a 45 day comment agencies issue regulations with prior Component, not more than three percent
period. notice and an opportunity for public may be used for administrative
comment and that rules should become expenses. The three percent limit is
II. This Interim Rule effective 30 days after publication in the applied to the amounts it receives under
For the reasons described above, Federal Register. See 5 U.S.C. 553. The the Comprehensive Plan Component
Treasury is amending when the APA, however, allows agencies to before termination of the Trust Fund.
statutory three percent cap on dispense with these procedures when Amounts used for administrative
administrative expenses is applied to the agency finds that good cause exists. expenses may not at any time exceed
the Council under 31 CFR 34.204(b). In this case, Treasury finds that good three percent of the total of the amounts
This Interim Final Rule provides that cause exists to dispense with prior received by the Council and the
the Council’s three percent limit applies notice and comment procedures and amounts in the Trust Fund that are
to the total amount the Council will make this rule immediately effective. As allocated to, but not yet received by, the
receive under the Comprehensive Plan discussed earlier in the preamble, the Council under § 34.103.
Component and ensures that the revision in this Interim Final Rule David A. Lebryk,
Council will not exceed the statutory amends when the Council calculates the Fiscal Assistant Secretary.
three percent cap before the termination statutorily required three percent [FR Doc. 2016–23348 Filed 9–27–16; 8:45 am]
of the trust fund. Specifically, the administrative expense limitation, and
BILLING CODE 4810–25–P
Interim Final Rule provides that does not impose any new obligations on
amounts used by the Council for the Act’s eligible recipients. While
administrative expenses may not at any Treasury had previously indicated it
time exceed three percent of the total of would issue a proposed rule, Treasury DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
the amounts received by the Council has determined that the revision will SECURITY
from the trust fund and the amounts in have minimal, and more than likely no, Coast Guard
the trust fund that are allocated to, but effect on the Act’s eligible recipients.
not yet received by, the Council. Nor does the Interim Final Rule impact 33 CFR Part 165
Treasury believes that this Interim Final the receipt and deposit into the trust
Rule balances the Council’s need for fund of the civil penalties which are [Docket Number USCG–2016–0883]
greater flexibility with compliance with generally fixed by consent decree. RIN 1625–AA00
the statutory limitation. The Interim Finally, the revision will help ensure
Final Rule amends only section that the Council can continue to Safety Zone; Main Branch of the
34.204(b) pertaining to when the three function effectively by supporting Chicago River, Chicago, IL
percent cap on administrative expenses predictable, long term financial
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
is measured. It does not amend the planning and operations. As a result,
definition of ‘‘administrative expenses’’ Treasury has determined that prior ACTION: Temporary final rule.
found at section 34.2. Nor does it amend notice and comment and a delayed SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
section 34.204(a) regarding limitations effective date are unnecessary and that establishing a temporary safety zone on
on administrative costs associated with good cause exists to make this Interim the Main Branch of the Chicago River,
grants from the Council under the Final Rule effective immediately. Chicago, IL. This action is necessary and
Comprehensive Plan Component.3 intended to ensure safety of life on the
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 34
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES

Treasury requests public comment on navigable waters of the United States
the amendment to section 34.204(b). Coastal zone, Fisheries, Grant immediately prior to, during, and after
programs, Grants administration, the filming of a motion picture from a
3 The final regulations define the term
Intergovernmental relations, Marine low flying helicopter. Entry of vessels or
‘‘administrative expenses.’’ 31 CFR 34.2. Note that
the final regulations distinguish ‘‘administrative
resources, Natural resources, Oil persons into this zone is prohibited
expenses’’ from ‘‘administrative costs,’’ also defined pollution, Research, Science and unless specifically authorized by the
in 31 CFR 34.2. technology, Trusts, Wildlife. Captain of the Port Lake Michigan.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Sep 27, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM 28SER1

66532 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 188 / Wednesday, September 28, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION more in any one year. Though this rule § 165.T09–0883 Safety Zone; Main Branch
CONTACT section. will not result in such an expenditure, of the Chicago River, Chicago, IL.
Small businesses may send comments we do discuss the effects of this rule (a) Location. All waters of the Main
on the actions of Federal employees elsewhere in this preamble. Branch of the Chicago River between the
who enforce, or otherwise determine Franklin-Orleans Street Highway Bridge
compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment and the Michigan Avenue Highway
the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under Bridge.
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security (b) Enforcement Period. This rule will
and the Regional Small Business Management Directive 023–01 and be enforced intermittently on October 1,
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, 2016 from 6 p.m. to 11 p.m. or an
Ombudsman evaluates these actions which guide the Coast Guard in alternate date of October 2, 2016 from 6
annually and rates each agency’s complying with the National p.m. to 11 p.m.
responsiveness to small business. If you Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
wish to comment on actions by U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have the general regulations in § 165.23 of
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– determined that this action is one of a this part, entry into, transiting, or
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The category of actions that do not anchoring within this safety zone is
Coast Guard will not retaliate against individually or cumulatively have a prohibited unless authorized by the
small entities that question or complain significant effect on the human Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or a
about this rule or any policy or action environment. This rule involves the designated on-scene representative.
of the Coast Guard. establishment of a safety zone for (2) This safety zone is closed to all
C. Collection of Information filming from a low flying helicopter on vessel traffic, except as may be
the Main Branch of the Chicago River in permitted by the Captain of the Port
This rule will not call for a new Lake Michigan or a designated on-scene
collection of information under the Chicago, IL. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph representative.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 (3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
U.S.C. 3501–3520). 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal checklist supporting this determination is any Coast Guard commissioned,
Governments and a Categorical Exclusion warrant or petty officer who has been
Determination are available in the designated by the Captain of the Port
A rule has implications for federalism
docket where indicated under Lake Michigan to act on his or her
under Executive order 13132,
ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or behalf.
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
information that may lead to the (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
effect on the States, on the relationship
discovery of a significant environmental or operate within the safety zone shall
between the national government and
impact from this rule. contact the Captain of the Port Lake
the States, or on the distribution of
Michigan or an on-scene representative
power and responsibilities among the G. Protest Activities to obtain permission to do so. The
various levels of government. We have
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or an
analyzed this rule under that Order and The Coast Guard respects the First on-scene representative may be
have determined that it is consistent Amendment rights of protesters. contacted via VHF Channel 16. Vessel
with the fundamental federalism Protesters are asked to contact the operators given permission to enter or
principles and preemption requirements person listed in the FOR FURTHER operate in the safety zone must comply
described in Executive order 13132. INFORMATION CONTACT section to
Also, this rule does not have tribal with all directions given to them by the
coordinate protest activities so that your Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, or an
implications under Executive order message can be received without
13175, Consultation and Coordination on-scene representative.
jeopardizing the safety or security of
with Indian Tribal Governments, people, places or vessels. Dated: September 21, 2016.
because it does not have a substantial A.B. Cocanour,
direct effect on one or more Indian List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
tribes, on the relationship between the Port, Lake Michigan.
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
Federal Government and Indian tribes, [FR Doc. 2016–23318 Filed 9–27–16; 8:45 am]
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
or on the distribution of power and BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
requirements, Security measures,
responsibilities between the Federal
Waterways.
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for For the reasons discussed in the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
federalism or Indian tribes, please preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 AGENCY
contact the person listed in the FOR CFR part 165 as follows:
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section 40 CFR Part 52
above. PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS [EPA–R06–OAR–2014–0221; FRL–9951–54–
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Region 6]
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Approval and Promulgation of
continues to read as follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES

Federal agencies to assess the effects of Implementation Plans; Oklahoma;
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; Revisions to Major New Source Review
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Permitting
particular, the Act addresses actions
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
that may result in the expenditure by a AGENCY: Environmental Protection
No. 0170.1.
State, local, or tribal government, in the Agency (EPA).
aggregate, or by the private sector of ■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0883 to read as
ACTION: Final rule.
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or follows:

VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Sep 27, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\28SER1.SGM 28SER1

Document Created: 2016-09-28 01:08:17
Document Modified: 2016-09-28 01:08:17

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule will be effective from 6 p.m. on October 1, 2016 to 11 p.m. on October 2, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions about this rule, call or email LT Lindsay Cook, Marine Safety Unit Chicago, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (630) 986-2155, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 66530
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

81 FR 66530 - Safety Zone; Main Branch of the Chicago River, Chicago, IL

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 188 (September 28, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard