81 FR 67293 - Reorganization and Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 214 Under Alternative Site Framework; Lenoir County, North Carolina
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 190 (September 30, 2016)
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 190 (September 30, 2016)
| Page Range | 67293-67293 | |
| FR Document | 2016-23700 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 190 (Friday, September 30, 2016)] [Notices] [Page 67293] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-23700] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign-Trade Zones Board [Order No. 2013] Reorganization and Expansion of Foreign-Trade Zone 214 Under Alternative Site Framework; Lenoir County, North Carolina Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of zones; Whereas, the North Carolina Department of Transportation, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 214, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket B-20-2016, docketed April 13, 2016) for authority to reorganize and expand under the ASF with a service area of the Counties of Pender, New Hanover, Brunswick, Duplin, Columbus, Bladen, Robeson, Beaufort, Pitt, Hyde, Onslow, Jones, Craven, Pamlico, Lenoir, Carteret, Wilson, Edgecombe, Nash, Wayne, Greene and Cumberland, within and adjacent to the Wilmington, Morehead City and Raleigh-Durham Customs and Border Protection ports of entry. FTZ 214's existing Sites 1, 5, 6 (as modified) and 7 would be categorized as magnet sites and Sites 2, 3 and 4 would be categorized as usage-driven sites, and the grantee proposes three additional magnet sites (Sites 8, 9 and 10); Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal Register (81 FR 23456-23457, April 21, 2016) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and, Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendation of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied provided that inclusion of Robeson County in the service area is limited to the portion of the county east of Interstate 95 (I-95); Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders: The application to reorganize and expand FTZ 214 under the ASF is approved, with the service area described above (i.e., inclusion of Robeson County in the service area is limited to the portion of the county east of I-95), subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, to the Board's standard 2,000- acre activation limit for the zone, to ASF sunset provisions for magnet sites that would terminate authority for Sites 1, 7, 8, 9 and 10 if not activated within five years from the month of approval and for Sites 5 and 6 if not activated within the initial ten years from the month of approval, and to an ASF sunset provision for usage-driven sites that would terminate authority for Sites 2, 3 and 4 if no foreign-status merchandise is admitted for a bona fide customs purpose within three years from the month of approval. Dated: September 15, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. [FR Doc. 2016-23700 Filed 9-29-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2016 / Notices 67293
• Integrated Partnership and Now, therefore, the Board hereby Shield Framework (Privacy Shield),
Communications Working Group orders: which requires that U.S. organizations
Report The application to reorganize and pay an annual fee to ITA in order to
Dated: September 22, 2016. expand FTZ 214 under the ASF is participate in the Privacy Shield. The
John H. Thompson,
approved, with the service area cost recovery program supports the
described above (i.e., inclusion of administration and supervision of the
Director, Bureau of the Census.
Robeson County in the service area is Privacy Shield program and supports
[FR Doc. 2016–23670 Filed 9–29–16; 8:45 am]
limited to the portion of the county east the provision of Privacy Shield-related
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P of I–95), subject to the FTZ Act and the services, including education and
Board’s regulations, including Section outreach. The Privacy Shield fee
400.13, to the Board’s standard 2,000- schedule was effective on August 1,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
acre activation limit for the zone, to ASF 2016, when ITA began accepting self-
Foreign-Trade Zones Board sunset provisions for magnet sites that certifications under the Privacy Shield
would terminate authority for Sites 1, 7, Framework.
[Order No. 2013]
8, 9 and 10 if not activated within five DATES: This fee schedule was effective
years from the month of approval and August 1, 2016.
Reorganization and Expansion of for Sites 5 and 6 if not activated within FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Foreign-Trade Zone 214 Under the initial ten years from the month of Requests for additional information
Alternative Site Framework; Lenoir approval, and to an ASF sunset regarding the EU–U.S. Privacy Shield
County, North Carolina provision for usage-driven sites that Framework should be directed to Grace
would terminate authority for Sites 2, 3 Harter, Department of Commerce,
Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign- and 4 if no foreign-status merchandise International Trade Administration,
Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as is admitted for a bona fide customs Room 20001, 1401 Constitution Avenue
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a–81u), the Foreign- purpose within three years from the NW, Washington, DC, tel. 202–482–
Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the month of approval. 4936 or 202–482–1512 or via email at
following Order:
Dated: September 15, 2016. privacyshield@trade.gov. Additional
Whereas, the Board adopted the Paul Piquado, information on ITA fees is available at
alternative site framework (ASF) (15 Assistant Secretary of Commerce for trade.gov/fees.
CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
establishment or reorganization of Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
zones; [FR Doc. 2016–23700 Filed 9–29–16; 8:45 am]
Background
Whereas, the North Carolina BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Consistent with the guidelines in
Department of Transportation, grantee OMB Circular A–25, federal agencies are
of Foreign-Trade Zone 214, submitted responsible for implementing cost
an application to the Board (FTZ Docket DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE recovery program fees.
B–20–2016, docketed April 13, 2016) for The role of ITA is to strengthen the
authority to reorganize and expand International Trade Administration competitiveness of U.S. industry,
under the ASF with a service area of the [Docket No. 160713610–6783–02] promote trade and investment, and
Counties of Pender, New Hanover, ensure fair trade through the rigorous
Brunswick, Duplin, Columbus, Bladen, RIN 0625–XC020 enforcement of our trade laws and
Robeson, Beaufort, Pitt, Hyde, Onslow, agreements. ITA works to promote
Jones, Craven, Pamlico, Lenoir, Carteret, Cost Recovery Fee Schedule for the privacy policy frameworks to facilitate
Wilson, Edgecombe, Nash, Wayne, EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework the flow of data across borders to
Greene and Cumberland, within and AGENCY: International Trade support international trade.
adjacent to the Wilmington, Morehead Administration, U.S. Department of The United States and the European
City and Raleigh-Durham Customs and Commerce. Union (EU) share the goal of enhancing
Border Protection ports of entry. FTZ privacy protection but take different
ACTION: Final notice of implementation
214’s existing Sites 1, 5, 6 (as modified) approaches to protecting personal data.
of a cost recovery program fee.
and 7 would be categorized as magnet Given those differences, the Department
sites and Sites 2, 3 and 4 would be SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce of Commerce (DOC) developed the
categorized as usage-driven sites, and published the Cost Recovery Fee Privacy Shield in consultation with the
the grantee proposes three additional Schedule for the EU–U.S. Privacy European Commission, as well as with
magnet sites (Sites 8, 9 and 10); Shield Framework on July 22, 2016 (81 industry and other stakeholders, to
Whereas, notice inviting public FR 47752). We gave interested parties an provide organizations in the United
comment was given in the Federal opportunity to comment on the fee States with a reliable mechanism for
Register (81 FR 23456–23457, April 21, schedule. No comments were received personal data transfers to the United
2016) and the application has been and so the fee schedule is considered States from the European Union while
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and final until further review one year after ensuring the protection of the data as
the Board’s regulations; and, implementation of the program. required by EU law.
Whereas, the Board adopts the Consistent with the guidelines in OMB In July 2016, the European
findings and recommendation of the Commission approved the EU–U.S.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Circular A–25,1 the U.S. Department of
examiner’s report, and finds that the Commerce’s International Trade Privacy Shield Framework. The
requirements of the FTZ Act and the Administration (ITA) has implemented published Privacy Shield Principles are
Board’s regulations are satisfied a cost recovery program fee to support available at: [insert link]. The DOC has
provided that inclusion of Robeson the operation of the EU–U.S. Privacy issued the Privacy Shield Principles
County in the service area is limited to under its statutory authority to foster,
the portion of the county east of 1 https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars_ promote, and develop international
Interstate 95 (I–95); a025. commerce (15 U.S.C. 1512). ITA will
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:49 Sep 29, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM 30SEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_67483/page/1.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-09 13:33:29
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 13:33:29
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 67293 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR