81_FR_67609 81 FR 67419 - Lehigh Railway, LLC-Lease Exemption Containing Interchange Commitment-Norfolk Southern Railway Company

81 FR 67419 - Lehigh Railway, LLC-Lease Exemption Containing Interchange Commitment-Norfolk Southern Railway Company

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 190 (September 30, 2016)

Page Range67419-67420
FR Document2016-23695

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 190 (Friday, September 30, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 190 (Friday, September 30, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67419-67420]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23695]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

[Docket No. FD 36062]


Lehigh Railway, LLC--Lease Exemption Containing Interchange 
Commitment--Norfolk Southern Railway Company

    Lehigh Railway, LLC (LRWY), a Class III rail carrier, has filed a 
verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to continue to lease 
from Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSR), and to operate, 
approximately 56.0 miles of rail line between milepost IS 269.5 at 
Athens, Pa., and milepost IS 213.5 at Mehoopany, Pa., in Bradford and 
Wyoming Counties, Pa., including any sidings, sidetracks, yards, or 
facilities presently owned by NSR that are accessed via the line.
    LRWY states that LRWY and NSR have entered into an amended lease 
agreement \1\ (Amended Lease) which served to renew the original lease 
agreement (Original Lease) that the parties had previously entered into 
on

[[Page 67420]]

October 28, 2008.\2\ According to LRWY, the Amended Lease extends the 
term of the Original Lease to December 31, 2023, and includes other 
changes. As required under 49 CFR 1150.43(h)(1), LRWY has disclosed in 
its verified notice that the Amended Lease contains an interchange 
commitment in the form of lease credits. LRWY states that these credits 
were part of the Original Lease and the terms of the credits in the 
Amended Lease remain unchanged. LRWY has provided additional 
information regarding the interchange commitment, as required by 49 CFR 
1150.43(h). LRWY notes that it will continue to be the operator of the 
line.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ LRWY filed a confidential, complete version of the Amended 
Lease with its notice of exemption to be kept confidential by the 
Board under 49 CFR 1104.14(a) without need for the filing of an 
accompanying motion for protective order under 49 CFR 1104.14(b).
    \2\ LRWY was granted authority to lease and operate the rail 
line in Lehigh Railway, LLC--Lease & Operation Exemption--Norfolk 
Southern Railway, FD 35192 (STB served Nov. 14, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    LRWY certifies that the projected annual revenues as a result of 
the proposed transaction will not result in LRWY's becoming a Class II 
or Class I rail carrier and will not exceed $5 million.
    The transaction may be consummated on or after October 15, 2016, 
the effective date of the exemption (30 days after the verified notice 
of exemption was filed). If the verified notice contains false or 
misleading information, the exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to 
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) may be filed at any time. 
The filing of a petition to revoke will not automatically stay the 
effectiveness of the exemption. Petitions to stay must be filed by 
October 7, 2016 (at least seven days prior to the date the exemption 
becomes effective).
    An original and 10 copies of all pleadings, referring to Docket No. 
FD 36062, must be filed with the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E 
Street SW., Washington, DC 20423-0001. In addition, a copy of each 
pleading must be served on applicant's representative, Kevin M. Sheys, 
Nossaman LLP, 1666 K Street NW., Suite 500, Washington, DC 20006.
    According to LRWY, this action is categorically excluded from 
environmental review under 49 CFR 1105.6(c).
    Board decisions and notices are available on our Web site at 
WWW.STB.GOV.

    Decided: September 27, 2016.

    By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of 
Proceedings.

Kenyatta Clay,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2016-23695 Filed 9-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4915-01-P



                                                                              Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2016 / Notices                                                 67419

                                                  and state threatened or endangered                        a. Describe the potential noise and                 archaeological resources that are
                                                  species, and the potential impacts to                   vibration impacts during the proposed                 historic properties, as appropriate.
                                                  these resources resulting from the                      project construction.
                                                                                                                                                                13. Aesthetics
                                                  proposed project.                                         b. Describe the potential noise and
                                                    b. Propose mitigation measures to                     vibration impacts of the proposed                       The EIS will:
                                                  avoid, minimize, eliminate, or                          project operation.                                      a. Describe the potential impacts of
                                                  compensate for potential impacts to                       c. Propose mitigation measures to                   the proposed project on any areas
                                                  biological resources, as appropriate.                   avoid, minimize or eliminate potential                identified or determined to be of high
                                                                                                          project impacts to sensitive noise                    visual quality.
                                                  6. Water Resources
                                                                                                          receptors, as appropriate.                              b. Propose mitigation measures to
                                                     The EIS will:
                                                     a. Describe the existing surface water               10. Energy Resources                                  avoid, minimize or eliminate potential
                                                  and groundwater resources within the                                                                          project impacts on aesthetics, as
                                                                                                            The EIS will:
                                                  project area, including lakes, rivers,                                                                        appropriate.
                                                                                                            a. Describe and evaluate the potential
                                                  streams, ponds, wetlands, and                           impact of the proposed project on the                 14. Environmental Justice
                                                  floodplains and analyze the potential                   distribution of energy resources in the
                                                  impacts on these resources.                                                                                     The EIS will:
                                                                                                          project area.
                                                     b. Describe the permitting                             b. Propose mitigation measures to                     a. Evaluate the potential impacts
                                                  requirements with regard to wetlands,                   avoid, minimize or eliminate potential                resulting from the proposed project on
                                                  river crossings, water quality,                         project impacts to energy resources, as               local and regional minority and low-
                                                  floodplains, and erosion control.                       appropriate.                                          income populations.
                                                     c. Propose mitigation measures to                                                                            b. Propose mitigation measures to
                                                  avoid, minimize, eliminate, or                          11. Socioeconomics                                    avoid, minimize or eliminate potential
                                                  compensate for potential project                          The EIS will:                                       project impacts on environmental
                                                  impacts to water resources, as                            a. Analyze the effects of the potential             justice populations, as appropriate.
                                                  appropriate.                                            temporary influx of construction                        Decided: September 27, 2016.
                                                     d. Describe EPA’s CERCLA process as                  workers and creation of permanent rail                  By the Board, Victoria Rutson, Director,
                                                  it relates to on and off-site water                     facilities jobs to the project area.                  Office of Environmental Analysis
                                                  resources.                                                b. Propose mitigation measures to                   Jeffrey Herzig,
                                                  7. Geology and Soils                                    avoid, minimize or eliminate potential
                                                                                                                                                                Clearance Clerk.
                                                                                                          project-related adverse impacts to social
                                                     The EIS will:                                        and economic resources, as appropriate.               [FR Doc. 2016–23692 Filed 9–29–16; 8:45 am]
                                                     a. Describe the geology, soils, and                                                                        BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
                                                  seismic conditions found within the                     12. Cultural and Historic Resources
                                                  project area, including unique or                          The EIS will:
                                                  problematic geologic formations or soils,                  a. Identify historic buildings,                    SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
                                                  prime farmland, and hydric soils, and                   structures, sites, objects, or districts
                                                  analyze the potential impacts on these                  eligible for listing on or listed on the              [Docket No. FD 36062]
                                                  resources resulting from each                           National Register of Historic Places
                                                  alternative.                                            (historic properties) within the area of              Lehigh Railway, LLC—Lease
                                                     b. Evaluate any potential measures to                potential effects for each alternative.               Exemption Containing Interchange
                                                  avoid or construct through unique or                    The cultural resources identified will be             Commitment—Norfolk Southern
                                                  problematic geologic formations or soils.               categorized into three major groups:                  Railway Company
                                                     c. Propose mitigation measures to                    Tribal resources, archaeological
                                                  avoid, minimize or eliminate potential                  resources, and built resources.                          Lehigh Railway, LLC (LRWY), a Class
                                                  project impacts to geology and soils, as                   b. Consult with federally recognized               III rail carrier, has filed a verified notice
                                                  appropriate.                                            Native American tribes to identify                    of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to
                                                     d. Describe EPA’s CERCLA process as                  properties with religious and cultural                continue to lease from Norfolk Southern
                                                  it relates to geology and soils.                        significance to the tribes within the area            Railway Company (NSR), and to
                                                  8. Air Quality and Climate                              of potential effects for each alternative             operate, approximately 56.0 miles of rail
                                                                                                          (tribal resources), and analyze potential             line between milepost IS 269.5 at
                                                     The EIS will:                                                                                              Athens, Pa., and milepost IS 213.5 at
                                                     a. Evaluate the air emissions from the               project impacts to them.
                                                                                                             c. Identify prehistoric-era and                    Mehoopany, Pa., in Bradford and
                                                  potential operation of the proposed                                                                           Wyoming Counties, Pa., including any
                                                  project including potential greenhouse                  historic-era archaeological resources by
                                                                                                          using professionals who meet the                      sidings, sidetracks, yards, or facilities
                                                  gas emissions, as appropriate.                                                                                presently owned by NSR that are
                                                     b. Evaluate the potential air quality                Secretary of the Interior Professional
                                                                                                          Qualifications Standards (SOIPQS) in                  accessed via the line.
                                                  impacts resulting from the proposed
                                                  project construction activities.                        the discipline of archaeology, and                       LRWY states that LRWY and NSR
                                                     c. Evaluate the potential impacts of                 analyze potential project impacts to                  have entered into an amended lease
                                                  the proposed project on global climate                  them.                                                 agreement 1 (Amended Lease) which
                                                  change and the potential impacts of                        d. Identify built resources by using               served to renew the original lease
                                                                                                          professionals who meet the SOIPQS in                  agreement (Original Lease) that the
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  global climate change on the proposed
                                                  project.                                                the disciplines of history or                         parties had previously entered into on
                                                     d. Propose mitigation measures to                    architectural history, and analyze
                                                  avoid, minimize or eliminate potential                  potential project impacts to them.                      1 LRWY filed a confidential, complete version of

                                                                                                             e. Propose measures to avoid,                      the Amended Lease with its notice of exemption to
                                                  project impacts, as appropriate.                                                                              be kept confidential by the Board under 49 CFR
                                                                                                          minimize, or mitigate potentially                     1104.14(a) without need for the filing of an
                                                  9. Noise and Vibration                                  adverse project impacts to tribal                     accompanying motion for protective order under 49
                                                     The EIS will:                                        resources, built resources, and                       CFR 1104.14(b).



                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   20:49 Sep 29, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00131   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM   30SEN1


                                                  67420                       Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2016 / Notices

                                                  October 28, 2008.2 According to LRWY,                   DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION                          65 from the I–80 separation to the
                                                  the Amended Lease extends the term of                                                                         Pleasant Grove Boulevard interchange
                                                  the Original Lease to December 31,                      Federal Highway Administration                        (post miles R4.8–R7.3) in the cities of
                                                  2023, and includes other changes. As                                                                          Roseville and Rocklin. The total length
                                                  required under 49 CFR 1150.43(h)(1),                    Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions                of the project is 2.5 miles along SR 65
                                                  LRWY has disclosed in its verified                      on Proposed Highway in California                     and 4.2 miles along I–80. The actions by
                                                  notice that the Amended Lease contains                  AGENCY:  Federal Highway                              the Federal agencies, and the laws
                                                  an interchange commitment in the form                   Administration (FHWA), DOT.                           under which such actions were taken,
                                                  of lease credits. LRWY states that these                ACTION: Notice of limitation on claims                are described in the Final
                                                  credits were part of the Original Lease                 for judicial review of actions by the                 Environmental Assessment (FEA) for
                                                  and the terms of the credits in the                     California Department of Transportation               the project, approved on 9/8/16, in the
                                                  Amended Lease remain unchanged.                         (Caltrans), pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327.                FHWA Finding of No Significant Impact
                                                  LRWY has provided additional                                                                                  (FONSI) issued on 9/8/16, and in other
                                                  information regarding the interchange                   SUMMARY:   The FHWA, on behalf of                     documents in the FHWA project
                                                  commitment, as required by 49 CFR                       Caltrans, is issuing this notice to                   records. The FEA, FONSI and other
                                                  1150.43(h). LRWY notes that it will                     announce actions taken by Caltrans, that              project records are available by
                                                  continue to be the operator of the line.                are final within the meaning of 23                    contacting Caltrans at the addresses
                                                     LRWY certifies that the projected                    U.S.C. 139(l)(1). The actions relate to a             provided above. This notice applies to
                                                  annual revenues as a result of the                      proposed highway project, located on                  all Federal agency decisions as of the
                                                  proposed transaction will not result in                 Interstate 80 between post miles 1.9 to               issuance date of this notice and all laws
                                                  LRWY’s becoming a Class II or Class I                   6.1 and on State Route 65 between post                under which such actions were taken,
                                                  rail carrier and will not exceed $5                     miles R4.8 to R7.3 in the County of                   including but not limited to:
                                                  million.                                                Placer, State of California. Those actions            1. Council on Environmental Quality
                                                                                                          grant licenses, permits, and approvals                     Regulations
                                                     The transaction may be consummated
                                                                                                          for the project.                                      2. National Environmental Policy Act of
                                                  on or after October 15, 2016, the
                                                  effective date of the exemption (30 days                DATES: By this notice, the FHWA, on                        1969, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et
                                                  after the verified notice of exemption                  behalf of Caltrans, is advising the public                 seq.
                                                  was filed). If the verified notice contains             of final agency actions subject to 23                 3. Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1970, 23
                                                  false or misleading information, the                    U.S.C. 139(l)(1). A claim seeking                          U.S.C 109
                                                  exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to               judicial review of the Federal agency                 4. MAP–21, the Moving Ahead for
                                                  revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C.                    actions on the highway project will be                     Progress in the 21st Century Act
                                                  10502(d) may be filed at any time. The                  barred unless the claim is filed on or                     (Pub. L. 112–141)
                                                  filing of a petition to revoke will not                 before February 27, 2017. If the Federal              5. Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
                                                  automatically stay the effectiveness of                 law that authorizes judicial review of a                   (CAAA)
                                                  the exemption. Petitions to stay must be                claim provides a time period of less                  6. Clean Water Act of 1977 and 1987
                                                                                                          than 150 days for filing such claim, then             7. Federal Water Pollution Control Act
                                                  filed by October 7, 2016 (at least seven
                                                                                                          that shorter time period still applies.                    of 1972 (see Clean Water Act of
                                                  days prior to the date the exemption
                                                                                                          FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For                       1977 & 1987)
                                                  becomes effective).
                                                                                                          Caltrans: Adele Pommerenck, Senior                    8. Federal Land Policy and Management
                                                     An original and 10 copies of all                                                                                Act of 1976 (Paleontological
                                                  pleadings, referring to Docket No. FD                   Environmental Planner, California
                                                                                                          Department of Transportation—District                      Resources)
                                                  36062, must be filed with the Surface                                                                         9. Noise Control Act of 1972
                                                  Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW.,                 3, 703 B Street, Marysville, California,
                                                                                                          95901, during normal business hours                   10. Safe Drinking Water Act of 1944, as
                                                  Washington, DC 20423–0001. In                                                                                      amended
                                                  addition, a copy of each pleading must                  from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., telephone
                                                                                                          (530) 741–4215 or email                               11. Endangered Species Act of 1973
                                                  be served on applicant’s representative,                                                                      12. Executive Order 11990, Protection of
                                                  Kevin M. Sheys, Nossaman LLP, 1666 K                    adele.pommerenck@dot.ca.gov.
                                                                                                                                                                     Wetlands
                                                  Street NW., Suite 500, Washington, DC                   SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective                  13. Executive Order 13112, Invasive
                                                  20006.                                                  July 1, 2007, the Federal Highway                          Species
                                                     According to LRWY, this action is                    Administration (FHWA) assigned, and                   14. Executive Order 13186, Migratory
                                                  categorically excluded from                             the California Department of                               Birds
                                                  environmental review under 49 CFR                       Transportation (Caltrans) assumed,                    15. Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act
                                                  1105.6(c).                                              environmental responsibilities for this                    of 1934, as amended
                                                                                                          project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327.                    16. Migratory Bird Treaty Act
                                                     Board decisions and notices are                      Notice is hereby given that the Caltrans,
                                                  available on our Web site at                                                                                  17. Water Bank Act Wetlands Mitigation
                                                                                                          has taken final agency actions subject to                  Banks, ISTEA 1991, Sections 1006–
                                                  WWW.STB.GOV.                                            23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) by issuing licenses,                   1007
                                                    Decided: September 27, 2016.                          permits, and approvals for the following              18. Wildflowers, Surface Transportation
                                                    By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,                     highway project in the State of                            and Uniform Relocation Act of 1987
                                                  Director, Office of Proceedings.                        California: improve the Interstate 80/                     Section 130
                                                  Kenyatta Clay,                                          State Route 65 (I–80/SR 65) interchange               19. Coastal Zone Management Act of
                                                                                                          in Placer County, California, to reduce
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  Clearance Clerk.                                                                                                   1972
                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–23695 Filed 9–29–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                          future traffic congestion, improve                    20. Coastal Zone Management Act
                                                                                                          operations and safety, and comply with                     Reauthorization Amendments Of
                                                  BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
                                                                                                          current Caltrans and local agency design                   1990
                                                    2 LRWY was granted authority to lease and
                                                                                                          standards. The project limits consist of              21. Executive Order 11988, Floodplain
                                                  operate the rail line in Lehigh Railway, LLC—Lease
                                                                                                          I–80 from the Douglas Boulevard                            Management
                                                  & Operation Exemption—Norfolk Southern                  interchange to the Rocklin Road                       22. Department of Transportation (DOT)
                                                  Railway, FD 35192 (STB served Nov. 14, 2008).           interchange (post miles 1.9–6.1) and SR                    Executive Order 5650.2—


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   20:49 Sep 29, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00132   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\30SEN1.SGM   30SEN1



Document Created: 2018-02-09 13:33:37
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 13:33:37
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation81 FR 67419 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR