81 FR 6761 - Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California; San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Employer Based Trip Reduction Programs
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 26 (February 9, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 26 (February 9, 2016)
| Page Range | 6761-6763 | |
| FR Document | 2016-02411 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 6761-6763] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-02411] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0715; FRL-9941-16-Region 9] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California; San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District; Employer Based Trip Reduction Programs AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a regulation submitted for incorporation into the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District (SJVUAPCD or District) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). The regulation, Rule 9410 (Employer Based Trip Reduction), establishes requirements for employers in the San Joaquin Valley to implement programs encouraging employees to use ridesharing and alternative transportation methods to reduce air pollution. The effect of this action is to make the requirements of Rule 9410 federally enforceable as part of the California SIP. DATES: This rule will be effective on March 10, 2016. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0715 for this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105- 3901. While all documents in the docket are listed at http://www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi- volume reports), and some may not be available in either location (e.g., confidential business information (CBI)). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Buss, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-4152, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and ``our'' refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. Proposed Action II. Public Comments and EPA Responses III. EPA Action IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Proposed Action On August 24, 2015 at 80 FR 51153, the EPA proposed to approve the following rule into the California SIP. [[Page 6762]] Table 1--Submitted Rule ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Local agency Rule No. Rule title Adopted Submitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SJVUAPCD...................... 9410 Employer Based Trip Reduction 12/17/09 05/17/10 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We proposed to approve this rule because we determined that it complied with the relevant Clean Air Act (``CAA'' or ``Act'') requirements. Our proposed action contains more information on the rule and our evaluation. II. Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, which ended on September 23, 2015, we received one comment from a member of the public. We are summarizing that comment and providing our response below. Comment: The commenter supports the rule and the District's goal of encouraging transportation alternatives to driving to work alone. But the commenter states that, although the supporting documents provide satisfactory information about how commuter programs can reduce air pollution, ``when reviewing the available information in the docket folder, [the commenter] noticed a lack of solutions to the problem of this particular facet of pollution in the primary document.'' The commenter asks whether this means that ``solutions have yet to be identified or fully planned.'' Response: Section 5 of Rule 9410 suggests trip reduction strategies that covered employers may choose to implement, including transit programs and ride-sharing opportunities, among others. Employers must identify which of these specific trip reduction strategies they will adopt, and report the results of their efforts annually to the SJVUAPCD. In today's action, EPA is not approving specific trip reduction plans for individual employers, but is approving the general requirements in Rule 9410 that direct employers to develop trip reduction plans. III. EPA Action No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rule as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving this rule into the California SIP. IV. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the SJVUAPCD rule described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA had made, and will continue to make, these documents available electronically through www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at the appropriate EPA office (see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information). V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Oxides of nitrogen, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: December 11, 2015. Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, Region IX. Part 52, Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 0 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F--California 0 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(379)(i)(C)(7) to read as follows: Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan. * * * * * (c) * * * (379) * * * (i) * * * (C) * * * [[Page 6763]] (7) Rule 9410, ``Employer Based Trip Reduction,'' adopted on December 17, 2009. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2016-02411 Filed 2-8-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 6761
and other required information to the and (G), (c)(187)(i)(E), (c)(254)(i)(C)(6) ACTION: Final rule.
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of and (7), and (c)(361)(i)(A)(4) to read as
Representatives, and the Comptroller follows: SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
General of the United States prior to Agency (EPA) is approving a regulation
§ 52.220 Identification of plan.
publication of the rule in the Federal submitted for incorporation into the San
Register. A major rule cannot take effect * * * * *
(c) * * * Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution
until 60 days after it is published in the Control District (SJVUAPCD or District)
Federal Register. This action is not a (51) * * *
(xiii) * * * portion of the California State
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. (E) Previously approved on May 18, Implementation Plan (SIP). The
804(2). 1981 in paragraph (c)(51)(xiii)(A) of this regulation, Rule 9410 (Employer Based
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean section and now deleted with Trip Reduction), establishes
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of replacement in paragraph requirements for employers in the San
this action must be filed in the United (c)(187)(i)(E)(1) of this section, Rule 206.
States Court of Appeals for the Joaquin Valley to implement programs
(F) Previously approved on May 18, encouraging employees to use
appropriate circuit by April 11, 2016. 1981 in paragraph (c)(51)(xiii)(A) of this
Filing a petition for reconsideration by ridesharing and alternative
section and now deleted with transportation methods to reduce air
the Administrator of this final rule does replacement in paragraph (c)(254)(i)(C)
not affect the finality of this action for pollution. The effect of this action is to
of this section, Rules 203 and 204.
the purposes of judicial review nor does make the requirements of Rule 9410
(G) Previously approved on May 18,
it extend the time within which a 1981 in paragraph (c)(51)(xiii)(A) of this federally enforceable as part of the
petition for judicial review may be filed, section and now deleted with California SIP.
and shall not postpone the effectiveness replacement in paragraph DATES:This rule will be effective on
of such rule or action. Parties with (c)(361)(i)(A)(4) of this section, Rule March 10, 2016.
objections to this direct final rule are 201.
encouraged to file a comment in * * * * * ADDRESSES: The EPA has established
response to the parallel notice of (187) * * * docket number EPA–R09–OAR–2014–
proposed rulemaking for this action (i) * * * 0715 for this action. Generally,
published in the Proposed Rules section (E) Santa Barbara County Air documents in the docket for this action
of this Federal Register, rather than file Pollution Control District. are available electronically at http://
an immediate petition for judicial (1) Rule 206, ‘‘Conditional Approval www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
review of this direct final rule, so that of Authority to Construct or Permit to EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
the EPA can withdraw this direct final Operate,’’ Revised October 15, 1991. San Francisco, California 94105–3901.
rule and address the comment in the * * * * * While all documents in the docket are
proposed rulemaking. This action may (254) * * * listed at http://www.regulations.gov,
not be challenged later in proceedings to (i) * * * some information may be publicly
enforce its requirements (see section (C) * * * available only at the hard copy location
307(b)(2)). (6) Rule 203, ‘‘Transfer,’’ revised April
17, 1997. (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps,
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 (7) Rule 204, ‘‘Applications,’’ revised multi-volume reports), and some may
Environmental protection, Air April 17, 1997. not be available in either location (e.g.,
pollution control, Incorporation by * * * * * confidential business information
reference, Intergovernmental relations, (361) * * * (CBI)). To inspect the hard copy
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate (i) * * * materials, please schedule an
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping (A) * * * appointment during normal business
requirements. (4) Rule 201, ‘‘Permits Required,’’ hours with the contact listed in the FOR
revised June 19, 2008. FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
* * * * *
Dated: December 3, 2015. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2016–02417 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am] Jeffrey Buss, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–
Jared Blumenfeld,
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 4152, buss.jeffrey@epa.gov.
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
of Federal Regulations is amended as ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
follows: AGENCY and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND 40 CFR Part 52 Table of Contents
PROMULGATION OF [EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0715; FRL–9941–16– I. Proposed Action
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Region 9] II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 Approval and Promulgation of IV. Incorporation by Reference
continues to read as follows: Implementation Plans; California; San V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution
I. Proposed Action
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Control District; Employer Based Trip
Subpart F—California Reduction Programs On August 24, 2015 at 80 FR 51153,
■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by AGENCY: Environmental Protection the EPA proposed to approve the
adding paragraphs (c)(51)(xiii)(E), (F), Agency (EPA). following rule into the California SIP.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:23 Feb 08, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM 09FER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_6787/page/1.svg)
![6762 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULE
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Adopted Submitted
SJVUAPCD ....... 9410 Employer Based Trip Reduction .................................................................. 12/17/09 05/17/10
We proposed to approve this rule accordance with requirements of 1 CFR • is not subject to requirements of
because we determined that it complied 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the Section 12(d) of the National
with the relevant Clean Air Act (‘‘CAA’’ incorporation by reference of the Technology Transfer and Advancement
or ‘‘Act’’) requirements. Our proposed SJVUAPCD rule described in the Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
action contains more information on the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth application of those requirements would
rule and our evaluation. below. The EPA had made, and will be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
II. Public Comments and EPA continue to make, these documents and
Responses available electronically through • does not provide EPA with the
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy discretionary authority to address, as
The EPA’s proposed action provided at the appropriate EPA office (see the appropriate, disproportionate human
a 30-day public comment period. During ADDRESSES section of this preamble for health or environmental effects, using
this period, which ended on September more information). practicable and legally permissible
23, 2015, we received one comment methods, under Executive Order 12898
from a member of the public. We are V. Statutory and Executive Order
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
summarizing that comment and Reviews
In addition, the SIP is not approved
providing our response below. Under the Clean Air Act, the to apply on any Indian reservation land
Comment: The commenter supports Administrator is required to approve a or in any other area where EPA or an
the rule and the District’s goal of SIP submission that complies with the Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
encouraging transportation alternatives provisions of the Act and applicable tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
to driving to work alone. But the Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); Indian country, the proposed rule does
commenter states that, although the 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP not have tribal implications and will not
supporting documents provide submissions, EPA’s role is to approve impose substantial direct costs on tribal
satisfactory information about how state choices, provided that they meet governments or preempt tribal law as
commuter programs can reduce air the criteria of the Clean Air Act. specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
pollution, ‘‘when reviewing the Accordingly, this action merely FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
available information in the docket proposes to approve state law as
folder, [the commenter] noticed a lack of meeting Federal requirements and does List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
solutions to the problem of this not impose additional requirements Environmental protection, Air
particular facet of pollution in the beyond those imposed by state law. For pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
primary document.’’ The commenter that reason, this proposed action: Incorporation by reference,
asks whether this means that ‘‘solutions • Is not a significant regulatory action Intergovernmental relations, Oxides of
have yet to be identified or fully subject to review by the Office of nitrogen, Ozone, Reporting and
planned.’’ Management and Budget under recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
Response: Section 5 of Rule 9410 Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, organic compounds.
suggests trip reduction strategies that October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
covered employers may choose to Dated: December 11, 2015.
January 21, 2011); Jared Blumenfeld,
implement, including transit programs • does not impose an information
and ride-sharing opportunities, among Regional Administrator, Region IX.
collection burden under the provisions
others. Employers must identify which of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 Part 52, Chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of these specific trip reduction strategies U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); of Federal Regulations is amended as
they will adopt, and report the results
• is certified as not having a follows:
of their efforts annually to the
significant economic impact on a
SJVUAPCD. In today’s action, EPA is PART 52—APPROVAL AND
substantial number of small entities
not approving specific trip reduction PROMULGATION OF
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
plans for individual employers, but is IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
approving the general requirements in
• does not contain any unfunded ■ 1. The authority citation for part 52
Rule 9410 that direct employers to
mandate or significantly or uniquely continues to read as follows:
develop trip reduction plans.
affect small governments, as described
III. EPA Action in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
No comments were submitted that of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
Subpart F—California
change our assessment of the rule as • does not have Federalism
described in our proposed action. implications as specified in Executive ■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by
Therefore, as authorized in section Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, adding paragraph (c)(379)(i)(C)(7) to
110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully 1999); read as follows:
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
approving this rule into the California • is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or § 52.220 Identification of plan.
SIP.
safety risks subject to Executive Order * * * * *
IV. Incorporation by Reference 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); (c) * * *
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing • is not a significant regulatory action (379) * * *
regulatory text that includes subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR (i) * * *
incorporation by reference. In 28355, May 22, 2001); (C) * * *
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:23 Feb 08, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM 09FER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_6787/page/2.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 9, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 6763
(7) Rule 9410, ‘‘Employer Based Trip DATES: This rule is effective on April 11, FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Reduction,’’ adopted on December 17, 2016 without further notice, unless the For the full EPA public comment policy,
2009. EPA receives adverse comments by information about CBI or multimedia
* * * * * March 10, 2016. If we receive such submissions, and general guidance on
[FR Doc. 2016–02411 Filed 2–8–16; 8:45 am] comments, we will publish a timely making effective comments, please visit
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P withdrawal in the Federal Register to http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
notify the public that this direct final commenting-epa-dockets.
rule will not take effect. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, Kevin Gong, EPA Region IX, (415) 972
AGENCY identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– 3073, Gong.Kevin@epa.gov.
OAR–2015–0756 at http://
40 CFR Part 52 www.regulations.gov, or via email to SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Steckel.Andrew@epa.gov. For comments Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0756; FRL–9941–11– submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Region 9] online instructions for submitting Table of Contents
Approval of California Air Plan comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from I. The State’s Submittal
Revisions, Yolo-Solano Air Quality A. What rules did the State submit?
Management District Regulations.gov. For either manner of
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
submission, the EPA may publish any C. What is the purpose of the rule
AGENCY: Environmental Protection comment received to its public docket. revisions?
Agency (EPA). Do not submit electronically any II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
ACTION: Direct final rule. information you consider to be A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
Confidential Business Information (CBI) B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection or other information whose disclosure is criteria?
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final restricted by statute. Multimedia C. EPA Recommendations to Further
action to approve revisions to the Yolo- submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be Improve the Rules
Solano Air Quality Management District accompanied by a written comment. D. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
(YSAQMD) portion of the California The written comment is considered the IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These official comment and should include
revisions concern emissions of volatile discussion of all points you wish to I. The State’s Submittal
organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides make. The EPA will generally not A. What rules did the State submit?
of nitrogen (NOX) from gasoline consider comments or comment
dispensing facilities and stationary gas contents located outside of the primary Table 1 lists the rules addressed by
turbines. We are approving local rules submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or this action with the dates that they were
that regulate these emission sources other file sharing system). For adopted by the local air agency and
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the additional submission methods, please submitted by the California Air
Act). contact the person identified in the FOR Resources Board (CARB).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Revised Submitted
YSAQMD ........... 2.22 Gasoline Dispensing Facilities ..................................................................... 01/14/14 06/26/15
YSAQMD ........... 2.34 Stationary Gas Turbines .............................................................................. 11/12/14 06/26/15
On August 13, 2015, the EPA 2.22 exempt certain categories of The EPA’s technical support
determined that the submittal for facilities that have other vapor recovery documents (TSDs) have more
YSAQMD Rules 2.22 and 2.34 met the control measures in place, require information about these rules.
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, aboveground storage tanks to install II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
appendix V, which must be met before additional approved vapor recovery
formal EPA review. systems, require Phase II enhanced A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Are there other versions of these vapor recovery systems at all dispensing SIP rules must be enforceable (see
rules? facilities, and require operators to CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not
conduct appropriate inspection and interfere with applicable requirements
We approved an earlier version of maintenance procedures.
Rule 2.22 into the SIP on January 23, concerning attainment and reasonable
2003 (68 FR 3190), and an earlier NOX helps produce ground-level further progress or other CAA
version of Rule 2.34 into the SIP on ozone, smog and PM, which harm requirements (see CAA section 110(l)),
September 3, 1998 (63 FR 46892). human health and the environment. and must not modify certain SIP control
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires requirements in nonattainment areas
C. What is the purpose of the rule States to submit regulations that control without ensuring equivalent or greater
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES
revisions? NOX emissions. The revisions to Rule emissions reductions (see CAA section
VOCs help produce ground-level 2.34 define new operation requirements 193).
ozone, smog and PM, which harm during start-up and shut-down of units Generally, SIP rules must require
human health and the environment. and during short-term exceedances Reasonably Available Control
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires under specific circumstances, and Technology (RACT) for each category of
States to submit regulations that control require facilities to install continuous sources covered by a Control
VOC emissions. The revisions to Rule emissions monitoring systems. Techniques Guidelines (CTG) document
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:23 Feb 08, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\09FER1.SGM 09FER1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_6787/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-02 14:30:35
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 14:30:35
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This rule will be effective on March 10, 2016. | |
| Contact | Jeffrey Buss, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-4152, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 6761 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Oxides of Nitrogen; Ozone; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements and Volatile Organic Compounds |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR