81_FR_67918 81 FR 67728 - Federal Acquisition Regulation; Prohibition on Contracting With Corporations With Delinquent Taxes or a Felony Conviction

81 FR 67728 - Federal Acquisition Regulation; Prohibition on Contracting With Corporations With Delinquent Taxes or a Felony Conviction

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 190 (September 30, 2016)

Page Range67728-67731
FR Document2016-23194

DoD, GSA, and NASA have adopted as final, without changes, an interim rule amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement sections of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015, to prohibit the Federal Government from entering into a contract with any corporation having a delinquent Federal tax liability or a felony conviction under any Federal law, unless the agency has considered suspension or debarment of the corporation and has made a determination that this further action is not necessary to protect the interests of the Government.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 190 (Friday, September 30, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 190 (Friday, September 30, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67728-67731]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23194]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Parts 1, 4, 9, 12, and 52

[FAC 2005-91; FAR Case 2015-011; Item I; Docket No. 2015-0011, Sequence 
No. 1]
RIN 9000-AN05


Federal Acquisition Regulation; Prohibition on Contracting With 
Corporations With Delinquent Taxes or a Felony Conviction

AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration 
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DoD, GSA, and NASA have adopted as final, without changes, an 
interim rule amending the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to 
implement sections of the Consolidated and Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2015, to prohibit the Federal Government from 
entering into a contract with any corporation having a delinquent 
Federal tax liability or a felony conviction under any Federal law, 
unless the agency has considered suspension or debarment of the 
corporation and has made a determination that this further action is 
not necessary to protect the interests of the Government.

DATES: Effective: September 30, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cecelia L. Davis, Procurement 
Analyst, at 202-219-0202 for clarification of content. For information 
pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory 
Secretariat Division at 202-501-4755. Please cite FAC 2005-91, FAR Case 
2015-011.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    DoD, GSA, and NASA published an interim rule in the Federal 
Register at 80 FR 75903 on December 4, 2015, to implement sections 744 
and 745 of Division E of the Consolidated and Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113-235) and section 523 of Division 
B of the same act. Three respondents submitted comments on the interim 
rule.

II. Discussion and Analysis

    The Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense Acquisition 
Regulations Council (the Councils) reviewed the public comments in the 
development of the final rule. A discussion of the comments are 
provided as follows:

A. Summary of Public Comments

    There were no changes made in the final rule as a result of the 
three public comments.

B. Analysis of Public Comments

1. Need for the Rule
    Comment: Two respondents expressed support for the interim rule. 
According to the respondents, this rule will facilitate more rigorous 
scrutiny of companies with a recent Federal conviction or unpaid 
Federal taxes and will help ensure that Federal contractors conduct 
themselves with the highest degree of integrity and honesty.
    Response: Noted.
    Comment: The other respondent said the rule is unnecessary, given 
the existing statutory and regulatory framework. This respondent noted 
that tax and criminal statutes already include penalties for tax 
delinquency and felony conviction, such as the Internal Revenue Code 
(title 26) and the Criminal Code (title 18). Furthermore, the 
respondent noted that the FAR already includes Federal tax delinquency 
and criminal malfeasance as causes for debarment. The respondent stated 
that agencies already reliably utilize suspension and debarment 
processes.
    Response: This rule is necessary to implement the requirements of 
sections 744 and 745 of Division E, title VIII of the Consolidated and 
Further Continuing Resolution Appropriations Act, 2015, as well as 
section 523 of Division B, title V of the same act (affects Commerce, 
Justice, NASA, and some related agencies). These appropriations act 
restrictions, although having some overlap with existing laws, have 
specific provisions that are not identical to existing laws and 
regulations, and must be implemented in order to avoid misuse of 
appropriated funds.
2. Meaning of ``Corporation''
    Comment: One respondent requested clarification as to what entities 
are and are not corporations for the purposes of this rule. The 
respondent stated that the term ``corporation'' could encompass C 
corporations, S corporations, and limited liability corporations 
(LLCs), among others. The respondent is concerned that if the rule 
applies to LLCs and S corporations, through which tax liability falls 
at the individual rather than the corporate level, that failure of one 
shareholder to pay taxes could adversely affect all shareholders. 
Likewise, the respondent is concerned how the rule would be applied if 
a shareholder or member of the entity is convicted of a felony.
    The respondent is also concerned about how this rule applies to a 
joint venture and teaming. First, can a corporation avoid disclosure of 
a felony conviction if it becomes a member of a joint venture? Second, 
if the joint venture is a corporate entity, are the underlying entities 
that make up the joint venture required to disclose tax delinquencies 
and felonies?
    Response: No change is made. The term ``corporation'' is used 
throughout the FAR without definition. If a term is used in the FAR 
without definition, then it has the standard dictionary definition. A 
corporation is a legal entity that is separate and distinct from the 
entities that own, manage, or control it. It is organized and 
incorporated under the jurisdictional authority of a governmental body, 
such as a State or the District of Columbia. The law does not specify 
any particular type of

[[Page 67729]]

corporation. The most common type of corporation in the U.S. is the 
subchapter C corporation--authorized under State law, and subject to 
tax under subchapter C of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). Most 
publicly traded corporations are C corporations. The IRC and other 
governing statutes authorize specialized corporations including the 
subchapter S corporation (e.g., per the IRC and State laws), 
professional corporation (PC) (e.g., per State laws), and limited 
liability company (LLC) (e.g., per State laws).
    Section 744 applies to ``any corporation that has any unpaid 
Federal tax liability . . .'' Section 745 applies to ``any corporation 
that was convicted of a felony criminal violation under any Federal law 
. . .'' Any corporation, including pass-through entities such as the S 
corporation and the LLC, may have an unpaid Federal tax liability--
there are Federal tax liabilities other than corporate income tax 
liability. While the S corporation and LLC may not incur Federal income 
tax liabilities as pass-through entities, they may incur Federal 
employment tax liabilities under subtitle C of 26 U.S.C. for payroll 
tax withholdings, social security and Medicare taxes; as well as 
various Federal excise tax liabilities, e.g., under subtitle D of 26 
U.S.C. on communications and air transportation facilities and 
services, coal, medical devices, group health plans, and failure to 
maintain minimum essential health insurance coverage; and under 
subtitle E of 26 U.S.C. on alcohol and tobacco, machine guns, some 
other firearms, and structured settlement factoring transactions.
    The corporation is an artificial construct, a legally created 
entity that generally has the same rights and responsibilities as a 
natural person. Thus, the corporation is not automatically immune from 
being convicted of a felony criminal violation under any Federal law 
merely because it is an artificial entity. A corporation can commit 
crimes as it can be held criminally liable for the illegal act of its 
directors, officers, employees, agents, or shareholders under the legal 
doctrine of respondeat superior. A corporation cannot be jailed if 
convicted. Otherwise, it faces the same consequences as a natural 
person following conviction. Depending on the facts and circumstances, 
any corporation may be convicted of a felony criminal violation under 
any Federal law, separate and apart from any felony criminal conviction 
of any of its directors, officers, employees, agents, or shareholders. 
While the liabilities of the corporate entity are separate from the 
liabilities of its shareholders generally because they are separate 
legal entities, the shareholders may become liable for corporate 
liabilities under the legal doctrine of piercing the corporate veil. 
Under certain facts and circumstances, a court may pierce the corporate 
veil and ignore the legal separateness of the corporation and its 
shareholders, and hold the shareholders and other principals personally 
liable for what would otherwise be corporate liabilities.
    Joint ventures and other teaming arrangements are temporary 
business arrangements where two or more parties agree to work together 
to achieve a specific task or objective, e.g., usually a new project, 
business activity, or a contract. A joint venture or other teaming 
arrangement is not necessarily a corporation--it all depends upon the 
legal structure and arrangement chosen for the temporary relationship 
formed by the members of the teaming arrangement. FAR 9.601 defines two 
types of teaming arrangements: Two or more companies form a partnership 
or joint venture entity to act as a potential prime contractor--the 
joint venture teaming arrangement; or a potential prime contractor 
agrees with one or more companies to have them act as its 
subcontractors under a specified Government contract or acquisition 
program--the prime-subcontractor teaming arrangement. In either type of 
teaming arrangement, the parties to the arrangement may be existing or 
newly created entities, or a combination thereof. With respect to the 
prime-subcontractor teaming arrangement, the prime contractor is 
subject to the rule if it is a corporation. With respect to the joint 
venture teaming arrangement, the joint venture can take many legal 
forms, including as a C corporation, LLC, or partnership. If the prime 
contractor(s) in the joint venture teaming arrangement is a 
corporation, it is subject to the rule. Conversely, if the prime 
contractor(s) in the joint venture teaming arrangement is(are) not a 
corporation, it is not subject to the rule, i.e., the legal form of the 
joint venture teaming arrangement will determine whether the joint 
venture prime contractor(s) is(are) subject to the rule. See FAR 4.102 
for the signatories for the various prime contractor entity types. If 
the signatory for the prime contractor is a corporation, it is subject 
to the rule.
    If the offeror or contractor is uncertain as to its legal status as 
a corporation, the offeror or contractor needs to consult with its 
legal counsel to determine whether it is a corporation subject to 
sections 744 and 745.
3. Finality of Felony Criminal Conviction
    Comment: One respondent noted that the rule requires contractors to 
report assessed, unpaid Federal tax liability only when all judicial 
and administrative remedies have been exhausted or have lapsed. The 
respondent noted, however, that the rule requires a contractor to 
disclose conviction of a felony criminal violation under any Federal 
law within the preceding 24 months, but does not provide any 
consideration as to whether the contractor has appealed the decision 
and such an appeal is pending. The respondent recommends that the rule 
should require disclosure of convictions only after all judicial 
remedies have been exhausted.
    Response: No change is made. The disclosure requirements of this 
rule are based on the statutory requirements of section 744 and 745. 
Section 745 applies to ``any corporation that was convicted of a felony 
criminal violation under any Federal law within the preceding 24 
months.'' Unlike section 744 which requires the exhaustion of all 
judicial and administrative remedies for any unpaid Federal tax 
liability, the plain text of section 745 does not require the 
exhaustion of all judicial and administrative remedies for a felony 
criminal violation conviction before it is applicable.
4. Response Time for Debarring Official
    Comment: One respondent is concerned that the lack of requirement 
for a reasonable response time for a debarring official to make a 
decision under this rule will likely delay the procurement process. The 
respondent recommends that the debarment official should be required to 
make a determination within five business days of receiving the inquiry 
from a contracting officer. According to the respondent, after the five 
days expires, the determination should automatically default to no 
suspension or debarment.
    Response: No change is made. Sections 744 and 745 do not require 
the suspending or debarring official to issue a determination to 
suspend or debar a corporation in accordance with the normal suspension 
and debarment process (see FAR subpart 9.4). If statutory text similar 
to the text of these sections is in an appropriations act, the funds 
appropriated by such an act are prohibited from being used to award to 
a corporation that has delinquent Federal taxes or has been convicted 
of a Federal felony unless the suspending or debarring official makes a 
positive determination that suspension or

[[Page 67730]]

debarment is not necessary to protect the interests of the Government.
5. Out of Scope
    Comment: Two respondents recommended that because this rule has a 
zero tolerance for tax delinquencies, the FAR Council should remove the 
$3,500 threshold for reporting of tax delinquencies at FAR 9.104-
5(a)(2) and paragraph (a)(1)(i)(D) of the provision at 52.209-5, 
Certification Regarding Responsibility Matters. The respondents also 
recommended expanding the certification provision at FAR 52.209-12 to 
include reporting of State and local tax delinquencies.
    Response: These recommendations are outside the scope of this rule, 
which is to implement sections 744 and 745 of division E and section 
523 of division B of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Resolution 
Appropriations Act, 2015. The certification at FAR 52.209-5(a)(1)(i)(D) 
with regard to delinquent Federal taxes was inserted in the FAR under 
FAR Case 2006-011 at the request of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee 
on Investigations. The certification in FAR 52.209-5 covers delinquent 
Federal taxes in excess of $3,500 within the past three years, is 
required in all solicitations when the contract value is expected to 
exceed the simplified acquisition threshold, and is used along with 
other factors in the determination of contractor responsibility. The 
representations in this final rule are based on an annual 
appropriations act funding restriction, and are required to be included 
in all solicitations when awards are made with such restricted 
appropriated funds. There is no de minimis amount of delinquent Federal 
taxes which does not need to be reported. These requirements are only 
in effect with respect to the affected appropriated funds when the 
funding restrictions are included in the specific annual appropriations 
act. The law does not restrict the award with appropriated funds to 
entities with regard to State and local tax delinquencies. Thus, there 
are no representations required as to the status of State and local tax 
delinquencies. 41 U.S.C. 1304, as implemented at FAR 1.107, prohibits 
the inclusion of non-statutory certifications unless justified in 
writing to the Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy.

III. Applicability to Acquisitions Not Greater Than the Simplified 
Acquisition Threshold and Commercial Items (Including Commercially 
Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items)

    The FAR Council and the Administrator for Federal Procurement 
Policy have determined that it would not be in the best interest of the 
Federal Government to exempt acquisitions with estimated value not 
greater than the simplified acquisition threshold and contracts for the 
acquisition of commercial items (including COTS items) from the 
application of these appropriations act restrictions.

IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

    Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess 
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O. 
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, 
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. 
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not 
subject to review under Section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning 
and Review, dated September 30, 1993. This rule is not a major rule 
under 5 U.S.C. 804.

V. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    DoD, GSA, and NASA have prepared a Final Regulatory Flexibility 
Analysis (FRFA) consistent with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 
U.S.C. 601, et seq. The FRFA is summarized as follows:

    This rule implements sections 744 and 745 of Division E of the 
Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. 
L. 113-235) (and similar provisions in subsequent appropriations 
acts) to prohibit using any of the funds made available under that 
or any other act to enter a contract with any corporation with any 
delinquent Federal tax liability or a felony conviction, unless the 
agency has considered suspension or debarment of the corporation and 
has made a determination that this further action is not necessary 
to protect the interests of the Government.
    The rule also implements section 523 of Division B of the 
Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. 
L. 113-235) (and similar provisions in subsequent appropriations 
acts). This section prohibits award of any contract in an amount 
greater than $5,000,000, unless the offeror affirmatively certifies 
that it has filed all Federal tax returns required during the three 
years preceding the certification; has not been convicted of a 
criminal offense under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and has 
not, more than 90 days prior to certification, been notified of any 
unpaid Federal tax assessment for which the liability remains 
unsatisfied, unless the assessment is the subject of an installment 
agreement or offer in compromise that has been approved by the 
Internal Revenue Service and is not in default, or the assessment is 
the subject of a non-frivolous administrative or judicial 
proceeding.
    DoD, GSA, and NASA published an interim rule in the Federal 
Register at 80 FR 75903 on December 4, 2015, to implement sections 
744 and 745 of Division E of the Consolidated and Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113-235) and section 523 of 
Division B of the same act. Three respondents submitted comments on 
the interim rule. No comments were received from the public relative 
to the initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
    Based on current data with regard to active registrants in the 
System for Award Management (SAM), the rule will apply to 
approximately 65,000 small business concerns, which are required to 
complete the annual representations and certifications at least once 
per year in order to keep their registration in SAM current.
    The information collection requirement imposed by this rule is 
minimal--a brief representation, and in some cases also a 
certification, each estimated to require an average of 6 minutes to 
complete.
    DoD, GSA, and NASA were unable to identify any significant 
alternatives that would reduce the impact on small businesses and 
still meet the objectives of the statute. However, other than the 
potential for not receiving award if the small entity is delinquent 
in payment of Federal taxes or has been convicted of a felony, there 
is no significant economic impact on small entities because the 
information collection burden imposed by the rule is minimal.

    Interested parties may obtain a copy of the FRFA from the 
Regulatory Secretariat. The Regulatory Secretariat has submitted a copy 
of the FRFA to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business 
Administration.

VI. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35) applies. The 
rule contains information collection requirements. OMB has cleared this 
information collection requirement under OMB Control Number 9000-0193, 
titled: Prohibition on Contracting with Corporations with Delinquent 
Taxes or a Felony Conviction.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1, 4, 9, 12, and 52

    Government procurement.

    Dated: September 19, 2016.
William F. Clark,
Director, Office of Government-wide Acquisition Policy, Office of 
Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.

Interim Rule Adopted as Final Without Change

0
Accordingly, the interim rule amending 48 CFR parts 1, 4, 9, 12, and 
52, which published in the Federal Register at 80 FR 75903 on December 
4,

[[Page 67731]]

2015, is adopted as a final rule without change.

[FR Doc. 2016-23194 Filed 9-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P



                                                  67728            Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

                                                  Item XI—Technical Amendments                            implement sections of the Consolidated                and felony conviction, such as the
                                                     Editorial changes are made at FAR                    and Further Continuing Appropriations                 Internal Revenue Code (title 26) and the
                                                  1.603–1, 4.1400, 22.805, 23.704, 26.103,                Act, 2015, to prohibit the Federal                    Criminal Code (title 18). Furthermore,
                                                  and 52.234–1.                                           Government from entering into a                       the respondent noted that the FAR
                                                                                                          contract with any corporation having a                already includes Federal tax
                                                    Dated: September 19, 2016.                            delinquent Federal tax liability or a                 delinquency and criminal malfeasance
                                                  William F. Clark,                                       felony conviction under any Federal                   as causes for debarment. The
                                                  Director, Office of Government-wide                     law, unless the agency has considered                 respondent stated that agencies already
                                                  Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition               suspension or debarment of the                        reliably utilize suspension and
                                                  Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.                                                                     debarment processes.
                                                                                                          corporation and has made a
                                                     Federal Acquisition Circular (FAC) 2005–             determination that this further action is                Response: This rule is necessary to
                                                  91 is issued under the authority of the                 not necessary to protect the interests of             implement the requirements of sections
                                                  Secretary of Defense, the Administrator of              the Government.                                       744 and 745 of Division E, title VIII of
                                                  General Services, and the Administrator for                                                                   the Consolidated and Further
                                                  the National Aeronautics and Space                      DATES: Effective: September 30, 2016.
                                                                                                                                                                Continuing Resolution Appropriations
                                                  Administration.                                         FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
                                                                                                                                                                Act, 2015, as well as section 523 of
                                                     Unless otherwise specified, all Federal              Cecelia L. Davis, Procurement Analyst,
                                                  Acquisition Regulation (FAR) and other                                                                        Division B, title V of the same act
                                                                                                          at 202–219–0202 for clarification of
                                                  directive material contained in FAC 2005–91                                                                   (affects Commerce, Justice, NASA, and
                                                                                                          content. For information pertaining to
                                                  is effective September 30, 2016 except for                                                                    some related agencies). These
                                                                                                          status or publication schedules, contact
                                                  items V, VI, VII, VIII, and IX, which are                                                                     appropriations act restrictions, although
                                                  effective October 31, 2016.                             the Regulatory Secretariat Division at                having some overlap with existing laws,
                                                                                                          202–501–4755. Please cite FAC 2005–                   have specific provisions that are not
                                                     Dated: September 20, 2016.                           91, FAR Case 2015–011.                                identical to existing laws and
                                                  Claire M. Grady,                                        SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                            regulations, and must be implemented
                                                  Director, Defense Procurement and                       I. Background                                         in order to avoid misuse of appropriated
                                                  Acquisition Policy.                                                                                           funds.
                                                                                                             DoD, GSA, and NASA published an
                                                     Dated: September 20, 2016.                           interim rule in the Federal Register at               2. Meaning of ‘‘Corporation’’
                                                  Jeffrey A. Koses,                                       80 FR 75903 on December 4, 2015, to                      Comment: One respondent requested
                                                  Senior Procurement Executive/Deputy CAO,                implement sections 744 and 745 of                     clarification as to what entities are and
                                                  Office of Acquisition Policy, U.S. General              Division E of the Consolidated and                    are not corporations for the purposes of
                                                  Services Administration.                                Further Continuing Appropriations Act,                this rule. The respondent stated that the
                                                     Dated: September 20, 2016.                           2015 (Pub. L. 113–235) and section 523                term ‘‘corporation’’ could encompass C
                                                  William G. Roets,
                                                                                                          of Division B of the same act. Three                  corporations, S corporations, and
                                                                                                          respondents submitted comments on the                 limited liability corporations (LLCs),
                                                  Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of
                                                  Procurement National Aeronautics and Space
                                                                                                          interim rule.                                         among others. The respondent is
                                                  Administration.                                         II. Discussion and Analysis                           concerned that if the rule applies to
                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–23193 Filed 9–29–16; 8:45 am]                                                                   LLCs and S corporations, through which
                                                                                                             The Civilian Agency Acquisition                    tax liability falls at the individual rather
                                                  BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
                                                                                                          Council and the Defense Acquisition                   than the corporate level, that failure of
                                                                                                          Regulations Council (the Councils)                    one shareholder to pay taxes could
                                                                                                          reviewed the public comments in the                   adversely affect all shareholders.
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
                                                                                                          development of the final rule. A                      Likewise, the respondent is concerned
                                                  GENERAL SERVICES                                        discussion of the comments are                        how the rule would be applied if a
                                                  ADMINISTRATION                                          provided as follows:                                  shareholder or member of the entity is
                                                                                                          A. Summary of Public Comments                         convicted of a felony.
                                                  NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND                                                                                         The respondent is also concerned
                                                  SPACE ADMINISTRATION                                       There were no changes made in the                  about how this rule applies to a joint
                                                                                                          final rule as a result of the three public            venture and teaming. First, can a
                                                  48 CFR Parts 1, 4, 9, 12, and 52                        comments.                                             corporation avoid disclosure of a felony
                                                                                                          B. Analysis of Public Comments                        conviction if it becomes a member of a
                                                  [FAC 2005–91; FAR Case 2015–011; Item
                                                  I; Docket No. 2015–0011, Sequence No. 1]
                                                                                                                                                                joint venture? Second, if the joint
                                                                                                          1. Need for the Rule                                  venture is a corporate entity, are the
                                                  RIN 9000–AN05                                              Comment: Two respondents                           underlying entities that make up the
                                                                                                          expressed support for the interim rule.               joint venture required to disclose tax
                                                  Federal Acquisition Regulation;                         According to the respondents, this rule               delinquencies and felonies?
                                                  Prohibition on Contracting With                         will facilitate more rigorous scrutiny of                Response: No change is made. The
                                                  Corporations With Delinquent Taxes or                   companies with a recent Federal                       term ‘‘corporation’’ is used throughout
                                                  a Felony Conviction                                     conviction or unpaid Federal taxes and                the FAR without definition. If a term is
                                                  AGENCY:  Department of Defense (DoD),                   will help ensure that Federal contractors             used in the FAR without definition,
                                                  General Services Administration (GSA),                  conduct themselves with the highest                   then it has the standard dictionary
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                  and National Aeronautics and Space                      degree of integrity and honesty.                      definition. A corporation is a legal
                                                  Administration (NASA).                                     Response: Noted.                                   entity that is separate and distinct from
                                                  ACTION: Final rule.                                        Comment: The other respondent said                 the entities that own, manage, or control
                                                                                                          the rule is unnecessary, given the                    it. It is organized and incorporated
                                                  SUMMARY:  DoD, GSA, and NASA have                       existing statutory and regulatory                     under the jurisdictional authority of a
                                                  adopted as final, without changes, an                   framework. This respondent noted that                 governmental body, such as a State or
                                                  interim rule amending the Federal                       tax and criminal statutes already                     the District of Columbia. The law does
                                                  Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to                         include penalties for tax delinquency                 not specify any particular type of


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   22:05 Sep 29, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00004   Fmt 4701   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\30SER4.SGM   30SER4


                                                                   Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2016 / Rules and Regulations                                        67729

                                                  corporation. The most common type of                    liabilities of its shareholders generally             3. Finality of Felony Criminal
                                                  corporation in the U.S. is the subchapter               because they are separate legal entities,             Conviction
                                                  C corporation—authorized under State                    the shareholders may become liable for                  Comment: One respondent noted that
                                                  law, and subject to tax under subchapter                corporate liabilities under the legal                 the rule requires contractors to report
                                                  C of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC).                   doctrine of piercing the corporate veil.              assessed, unpaid Federal tax liability
                                                  Most publicly traded corporations are C                 Under certain facts and circumstances,                only when all judicial and
                                                  corporations. The IRC and other                         a court may pierce the corporate veil                 administrative remedies have been
                                                  governing statutes authorize specialized                and ignore the legal separateness of the              exhausted or have lapsed. The
                                                  corporations including the subchapter S                 corporation and its shareholders, and                 respondent noted, however, that the
                                                  corporation (e.g., per the IRC and State                hold the shareholders and other                       rule requires a contractor to disclose
                                                  laws), professional corporation (PC)                    principals personally liable for what                 conviction of a felony criminal violation
                                                  (e.g., per State laws), and limited                     would otherwise be corporate liabilities.             under any Federal law within the
                                                  liability company (LLC) (e.g., per State
                                                                                                             Joint ventures and other teaming                   preceding 24 months, but does not
                                                  laws).
                                                     Section 744 applies to ‘‘any                         arrangements are temporary business                   provide any consideration as to whether
                                                  corporation that has any unpaid Federal                 arrangements where two or more parties                the contractor has appealed the decision
                                                  tax liability . . .’’ Section 745 applies to            agree to work together to achieve a                   and such an appeal is pending. The
                                                  ‘‘any corporation that was convicted of                 specific task or objective, e.g., usually a           respondent recommends that the rule
                                                  a felony criminal violation under any                   new project, business activity, or a                  should require disclosure of convictions
                                                  Federal law . . .’’ Any corporation,                    contract. A joint venture or other                    only after all judicial remedies have
                                                  including pass-through entities such as                 teaming arrangement is not necessarily                been exhausted.
                                                  the S corporation and the LLC, may                      a corporation—it all depends upon the                   Response: No change is made. The
                                                  have an unpaid Federal tax liability—                   legal structure and arrangement chosen                disclosure requirements of this rule are
                                                  there are Federal tax liabilities other                 for the temporary relationship formed                 based on the statutory requirements of
                                                  than corporate income tax liability.                    by the members of the teaming                         section 744 and 745. Section 745
                                                  While the S corporation and LLC may                     arrangement. FAR 9.601 defines two                    applies to ‘‘any corporation that was
                                                  not incur Federal income tax liabilities                types of teaming arrangements: Two or                 convicted of a felony criminal violation
                                                  as pass-through entities, they may incur                more companies form a partnership or                  under any Federal law within the
                                                  Federal employment tax liabilities                      joint venture entity to act as a potential            preceding 24 months.’’ Unlike section
                                                  under subtitle C of 26 U.S.C. for payroll               prime contractor—the joint venture                    744 which requires the exhaustion of all
                                                  tax withholdings, social security and                   teaming arrangement; or a potential                   judicial and administrative remedies for
                                                  Medicare taxes; as well as various                      prime contractor agrees with one or                   any unpaid Federal tax liability, the
                                                  Federal excise tax liabilities, e.g., under             more companies to have them act as its                plain text of section 745 does not
                                                  subtitle D of 26 U.S.C. on                              subcontractors under a specified                      require the exhaustion of all judicial
                                                  communications and air transportation                   Government contract or acquisition                    and administrative remedies for a felony
                                                  facilities and services, coal, medical                  program—the prime-subcontractor                       criminal violation conviction before it is
                                                  devices, group health plans, and failure                teaming arrangement. In either type of                applicable.
                                                  to maintain minimum essential health                    teaming arrangement, the parties to the               4. Response Time for Debarring Official
                                                  insurance coverage; and under subtitle E                arrangement may be existing or newly
                                                  of 26 U.S.C. on alcohol and tobacco,                                                                            Comment: One respondent is
                                                                                                          created entities, or a combination
                                                  machine guns, some other firearms, and                                                                        concerned that the lack of requirement
                                                                                                          thereof. With respect to the prime-
                                                  structured settlement factoring                                                                               for a reasonable response time for a
                                                                                                          subcontractor teaming arrangement, the
                                                  transactions.                                                                                                 debarring official to make a decision
                                                                                                          prime contractor is subject to the rule if
                                                     The corporation is an artificial                                                                           under this rule will likely delay the
                                                                                                          it is a corporation. With respect to the
                                                  construct, a legally created entity that                                                                      procurement process. The respondent
                                                                                                          joint venture teaming arrangement, the
                                                  generally has the same rights and                                                                             recommends that the debarment official
                                                                                                          joint venture can take many legal forms,
                                                  responsibilities as a natural person.                                                                         should be required to make a
                                                                                                          including as a C corporation, LLC, or
                                                  Thus, the corporation is not                                                                                  determination within five business days
                                                                                                          partnership. If the prime contractor(s) in            of receiving the inquiry from a
                                                  automatically immune from being                         the joint venture teaming arrangement is
                                                  convicted of a felony criminal violation                                                                      contracting officer. According to the
                                                                                                          a corporation, it is subject to the rule.             respondent, after the five days expires,
                                                  under any Federal law merely because                    Conversely, if the prime contractor(s) in
                                                  it is an artificial entity. A corporation                                                                     the determination should automatically
                                                                                                          the joint venture teaming arrangement                 default to no suspension or debarment.
                                                  can commit crimes as it can be held
                                                                                                          is(are) not a corporation, it is not subject            Response: No change is made.
                                                  criminally liable for the illegal act of its
                                                                                                          to the rule, i.e., the legal form of the              Sections 744 and 745 do not require the
                                                  directors, officers, employees, agents, or
                                                                                                          joint venture teaming arrangement will                suspending or debarring official to issue
                                                  shareholders under the legal doctrine of
                                                                                                          determine whether the joint venture                   a determination to suspend or debar a
                                                  respondeat superior. A corporation
                                                  cannot be jailed if convicted. Otherwise,               prime contractor(s) is(are) subject to the            corporation in accordance with the
                                                  it faces the same consequences as a                     rule. See FAR 4.102 for the signatories               normal suspension and debarment
                                                  natural person following conviction.                    for the various prime contractor entity               process (see FAR subpart 9.4). If
                                                  Depending on the facts and                              types. If the signatory for the prime                 statutory text similar to the text of these
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                  circumstances, any corporation may be                   contractor is a corporation, it is subject            sections is in an appropriations act, the
                                                  convicted of a felony criminal violation                to the rule.                                          funds appropriated by such an act are
                                                  under any Federal law, separate and                        If the offeror or contractor is uncertain          prohibited from being used to award to
                                                  apart from any felony criminal                          as to its legal status as a corporation, the          a corporation that has delinquent
                                                  conviction of any of its directors,                     offeror or contractor needs to consult                Federal taxes or has been convicted of
                                                  officers, employees, agents, or                         with its legal counsel to determine                   a Federal felony unless the suspending
                                                  shareholders. While the liabilities of the              whether it is a corporation subject to                or debarring official makes a positive
                                                  corporate entity are separate from the                  sections 744 and 745.                                 determination that suspension or


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   22:05 Sep 29, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00005   Fmt 4701   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\30SER4.SGM   30SER4


                                                  67730            Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

                                                  debarment is not necessary to protect                   Policy have determined that it would                  non-frivolous administrative or judicial
                                                  the interests of the Government.                        not be in the best interest of the Federal            proceeding.
                                                                                                          Government to exempt acquisitions                        DoD, GSA, and NASA published an
                                                  5. Out of Scope                                                                                               interim rule in the Federal Register at 80 FR
                                                                                                          with estimated value not greater than
                                                     Comment: Two respondents                                                                                   75903 on December 4, 2015, to implement
                                                                                                          the simplified acquisition threshold and              sections 744 and 745 of Division E of the
                                                  recommended that because this rule has                  contracts for the acquisition of                      Consolidated and Further Continuing
                                                  a zero tolerance for tax delinquencies,                 commercial items (including COTS                      Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113–235)
                                                  the FAR Council should remove the                       items) from the application of these                  and section 523 of Division B of the same act.
                                                  $3,500 threshold for reporting of tax                   appropriations act restrictions.                      Three respondents submitted comments on
                                                  delinquencies at FAR 9.104–5(a)(2) and                                                                        the interim rule. No comments were received
                                                  paragraph (a)(1)(i)(D) of the provision at              IV. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563                  from the public relative to the initial
                                                  52.209–5, Certification Regarding                          Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and                 regulatory flexibility analysis.
                                                  Responsibility Matters. The respondents                 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs                Based on current data with regard to active
                                                  also recommended expanding the                          and benefits of available regulatory                  registrants in the System for Award
                                                  certification provision at FAR 52.209–12                alternatives and, if regulation is                    Management (SAM), the rule will apply to
                                                  to include reporting of State and local                                                                       approximately 65,000 small business
                                                                                                          necessary, to select regulatory                       concerns, which are required to complete the
                                                  tax delinquencies.                                      approaches that maximize net benefits                 annual representations and certifications at
                                                     Response: These recommendations                      (including potential economic,                        least once per year in order to keep their
                                                  are outside the scope of this rule, which               environmental, public health and safety               registration in SAM current.
                                                  is to implement sections 744 and 745 of                 effects, distributive impacts, and                       The information collection requirement
                                                  division E and section 523 of division                  equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the                    imposed by this rule is minimal—a brief
                                                  B of the Consolidated and Further                       importance of quantifying both costs                  representation, and in some cases also a
                                                  Continuing Resolution Appropriations                    and benefits, of reducing costs, of                   certification, each estimated to require an
                                                  Act, 2015. The certification at FAR                     harmonizing rules, and of promoting                   average of 6 minutes to complete.
                                                  52.209–5(a)(1)(i)(D) with regard to                                                                              DoD, GSA, and NASA were unable to
                                                                                                          flexibility. This is not a significant                identify any significant alternatives that
                                                  delinquent Federal taxes was inserted in                regulatory action and, therefore, was not
                                                  the FAR under FAR Case 2006–011 at                                                                            would reduce the impact on small businesses
                                                                                                          subject to review under Section 6(b) of               and still meet the objectives of the statute.
                                                  the request of the Senate Permanent                     E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and                   However, other than the potential for not
                                                  Subcommittee on Investigations. The                     Review, dated September 30, 1993. This                receiving award if the small entity is
                                                  certification in FAR 52.209–5 covers                    rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.               delinquent in payment of Federal taxes or
                                                  delinquent Federal taxes in excess of                   804.                                                  has been convicted of a felony, there is no
                                                  $3,500 within the past three years, is                                                                        significant economic impact on small entities
                                                  required in all solicitations when the                  V. Regulatory Flexibility Act                         because the information collection burden
                                                  contract value is expected to exceed the                  DoD, GSA, and NASA have prepared                    imposed by the rule is minimal.
                                                  simplified acquisition threshold, and is                a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
                                                  used along with other factors in the                                                                            Interested parties may obtain a copy
                                                                                                          (FRFA) consistent with the Regulatory                 of the FRFA from the Regulatory
                                                  determination of contractor                             Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. The
                                                  responsibility. The representations in                                                                        Secretariat. The Regulatory Secretariat
                                                                                                          FRFA is summarized as follows:                        has submitted a copy of the FRFA to the
                                                  this final rule are based on an annual
                                                                                                             This rule implements sections 744 and 745          Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
                                                  appropriations act funding restriction,                 of Division E of the Consolidated and Further
                                                  and are required to be included in all                                                                        Business Administration.
                                                                                                          Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L.
                                                  solicitations when awards are made                      113–235) (and similar provisions in                   VI. Paperwork Reduction Act
                                                  with such restricted appropriated funds.                subsequent appropriations acts) to prohibit
                                                  There is no de minimis amount of                        using any of the funds made available under              The Paperwork Reduction Act (44
                                                  delinquent Federal taxes which does not                 that or any other act to enter a contract with        U.S.C. Chapter 35) applies. The rule
                                                  need to be reported. These requirements                 any corporation with any delinquent Federal           contains information collection
                                                                                                          tax liability or a felony conviction, unless the      requirements. OMB has cleared this
                                                  are only in effect with respect to the                  agency has considered suspension or
                                                  affected appropriated funds when the                                                                          information collection requirement
                                                                                                          debarment of the corporation and has made
                                                  funding restrictions are included in the                a determination that this further action is not       under OMB Control Number 9000–0193,
                                                  specific annual appropriations act. The                 necessary to protect the interests of the             titled: Prohibition on Contracting with
                                                  law does not restrict the award with                    Government.                                           Corporations with Delinquent Taxes or
                                                  appropriated funds to entities with                        The rule also implements section 523 of            a Felony Conviction.
                                                  regard to State and local tax                           Division B of the Consolidated and Further
                                                                                                          Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L.          List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1, 4, 9,
                                                  delinquencies. Thus, there are no                                                                             12, and 52
                                                                                                          113–235) (and similar provisions in
                                                  representations required as to the status               subsequent appropriations acts). This section
                                                  of State and local tax delinquencies. 41                prohibits award of any contract in an amount              Government procurement.
                                                  U.S.C. 1304, as implemented at FAR                      greater than $5,000,000, unless the offeror             Dated: September 19, 2016.
                                                  1.107, prohibits the inclusion of non-                  affirmatively certifies that it has filed all         William F. Clark,
                                                  statutory certifications unless justified               Federal tax returns required during the three
                                                                                                          years preceding the certification; has not            Director, Office of Government-wide
                                                  in writing to the Administrator for
                                                                                                          been convicted of a criminal offense under            Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
                                                  Federal Procurement Policy.
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                                                                          the Internal Revenue Code of 1986; and has            Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
                                                  III. Applicability to Acquisitions Not                  not, more than 90 days prior to certification,        Interim Rule Adopted as Final Without
                                                  Greater Than the Simplified                             been notified of any unpaid Federal tax
                                                                                                                                                                Change
                                                  Acquisition Threshold and Commercial                    assessment for which the liability remains
                                                  Items (Including Commercially                           unsatisfied, unless the assessment is the
                                                                                                          subject of an installment agreement or offer          ■ Accordingly, the interim rule
                                                  Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items)                                                                         amending 48 CFR parts 1, 4, 9, 12, and
                                                                                                          in compromise that has been approved by the
                                                     The FAR Council and the                              Internal Revenue Service and is not in                52, which published in the Federal
                                                  Administrator for Federal Procurement                   default, or the assessment is the subject of a        Register at 80 FR 75903 on December 4,


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   22:05 Sep 29, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00006   Fmt 4701   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\30SER4.SGM   30SER4


                                                                   Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 190 / Friday, September 30, 2016 / Rules and Regulations                                          67731

                                                  2015, is adopted as a final rule without                VEVRAA requires Federal contractors                   veterans’ employment filed in 2012 to
                                                  change.                                                 and subcontractors to annually report                 estimate the number of small entities that
                                                                                                          on the total number of their employees                would be subject to its rule. The VETS rule
                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–23194 Filed 9–29–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                          who belong to the categories of veterans              applies to any industry represented by a
                                                  BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P                                                                                        Federal contractor with a contract of
                                                                                                          protected under VEVRAA, as amended                    $150,000 or more. Therefore, VETS used the
                                                                                                          by the JVA, and the total number of                   Small Business Administration’s ‘‘fewer than
                                                  DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE                                   those protected veterans who were hired               500 employees’’ limit when making an
                                                                                                          during the period covered by the report.              across-the-board size standard classification
                                                  GENERAL SERVICES                                        No public comments were submitted on                  for estimating purposes. VETS estimated that
                                                  ADMINISTRATION                                          the interim rule.                                     15,000 Federal contractors will be subject to
                                                                                                                                                                the reporting requirements of the rule and of
                                                                                                          II. Discussion and Analysis                           that, VETS approximated that the number of
                                                  NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
                                                  SPACE ADMINISTRATION                                       The Civilian Agency Acquisition                    small entities that would be subject to the
                                                                                                          Council and the Defense Acquisition                   rule would be 8,000 (approximately 53
                                                  48 CFR Parts 1, 22, and 52                              Regulations Council (the Councils) did                percent of the total Federal contractors
                                                                                                          not receive any comments on the                       impacted by the rule).
                                                  [FAC 2005–91; FAR Case 2015–036; Item                                                                           This FAR rule does not add any new
                                                                                                          interim rule; accordingly the Councils
                                                  II; Docket No. 2015–0036, Sequence No. 1]                                                                     reporting, recordkeeping, or other
                                                                                                          are finalizing the interim rule without               compliance burdens. The FAR rule makes
                                                  RIN 9000–AN14                                           change.                                               contracting officers and contractors aware of
                                                                                                          III. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563                 the VETS reporting requirements.
                                                  Federal Acquisition Regulation;                                                                                 DoD, GSA, and NASA are not aware of any
                                                  Updating Federal Contractor Reporting                      Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and                 significant alternatives to the rule which
                                                  of Veterans’ Employment                                 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs             would accomplish the stated objectives of
                                                                                                          and benefits of available regulatory                  implementing the VETS final rule, while
                                                  AGENCY:  Department of Defense (DoD),
                                                                                                          alternatives and, if regulation is                    minimizing impact on small entities. DoD,
                                                  General Services Administration (GSA),                                                                        GSA, and NASA do not have the flexibility
                                                                                                          necessary, to select regulatory
                                                  and National Aeronautics and Space                                                                            of making any changes to the VETS rule,
                                                                                                          approaches that maximize net benefits
                                                  Administration (NASA).                                                                                        which has already been published for public
                                                                                                          (including potential economic,
                                                  ACTION: Final rule.                                                                                           comment and has taken effect as a final rule.
                                                                                                          environmental, public health and safety
                                                                                                                                                                There is no significant impact on small
                                                  SUMMARY:   DoD, GSA, and NASA are                       effects, distributive impacts, and                    entities imposed by the FAR rule.
                                                  adopting as final, without change, an                   equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
                                                  interim rule amending the Federal                       importance of quantifying both costs                    Interested parties may obtain a copy
                                                  Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to                         and benefits, of reducing costs, of                   of the FRFA from the Regulatory
                                                  implement a final rule issued by the                    harmonizing rules, and of promoting                   Secretariat. The Regulatory Secretariat
                                                  Department of Labor’s (DOL) Veterans’                   flexibility. This is not a significant                has submitted a copy of the FRFA to the
                                                  Employment and Training Service                         regulatory action and, therefore, was not             Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
                                                  (VETS) that replaced the VETS–100 and                   subject to review under Section 6(b) of               Business Administration.
                                                  VETS–100A Federal Contractor                            E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
                                                                                                          Review, dated September 30, 1993. This                V. Paperwork Reduction Act
                                                  Veterans’ Employment Report forms
                                                  with the VETS–4212, Federal Contractor                  rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C.                 The Paperwork Reduction Act (44
                                                  Veterans’ Employment Report form.                       804.                                                  U.S.C chapter 35) applies. The rule
                                                  DATES: Effective: September 30, 2016.                   IV. Regulatory Flexibility Act                        contains information collection
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.                      DoD, GSA, and NASA have prepared                    requirements that are subject to review
                                                  Zenaida Delgado, Procurement Analyst,                   a Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis               and approval by the Office of
                                                  at 202–969–7207 for clarification of                    (FRFA) consistent with the Regulatory                 Management and Budget (OMB) under
                                                  content. For information pertaining to                  Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. The            the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
                                                  status or publication schedules, contact                FRFA is summarized as follows:                        (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. However,
                                                  the Regulatory Secretariat Division at                                                                        the applicable information collections
                                                                                                            This rule is issued to adopt as final,              are derived from the requirements of the
                                                  202–501–4755. Please cite FAC 2005–                     without change, an interim rule published in
                                                  91, FAR Case 2015–036.                                                                                        41 CFR part 61–300 regulations
                                                                                                          the Federal Register at 80 FR 75908 on
                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:                              December 4, 2015, implementing changes to             implementing the reporting
                                                                                                          41 CFR 61–250 and 61–300 which was                    requirements under VEVRAA; see
                                                  I. Background                                           published in the Federal Register at 79 FR            detailed discussion in DOL’s rule under
                                                     DoD, GSA, and NASA published an                      57463 on September 25, 2014, by the                   the Paperwork Reduction Act section
                                                  interim rule in the Federal Register at                 Veterans’ Employment and Training Service             which was published in the Federal
                                                                                                          (VETS) of the Department of Labor (DOL).              Register at 79 FR 57463 on September
                                                  80 FR 75908 on December 4, 2015, to                     The objective of the VETS rule is to revise
                                                  implement a final rule issued by VETS                                                                         25, 2014. OMB assigned OMB Control
                                                                                                          the current regulations implementing 38
                                                  of the DOL that was published in the                    U.S.C. 4212. The VETS rule rescinded
                                                                                                                                                                Numbers 1250–0004, OFCCP
                                                  Federal Register at 79 FR 57463 on                      obsolete regulations at 41 CFR 61–250,                Recordkeeping and Reporting
                                                  September 25, 2014. The VETS of DOL                     changed the manner in which Federal                   Requirements, 38 U.S.C. 4212, Vietnam
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES




                                                  rule rescinded the regulations at 41 CFR                Contractors report veterans’ employment               Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance
                                                  part 61–250 and revised the regulations                 data, updated terminology, and revised the            Act of 1974, as amended, and 1293–
                                                  at 41 CFR part 61–300, which                            annual report, the report name, and methods           0005, Federal Contractor Veterans’
                                                                                                          of filing the report.                                 Employment Report.
                                                  implemented the reporting requirements                    No public comments were submitted in
                                                  under the Vietnam Era Veterans’                         response to the initial regulatory flexibility        List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 1, 22,
                                                  Readjustment Assistance Act                             analysis or the interim rule.                         and 52
                                                  (VEVRAA), as amended and the Jobs for                     VETS used data in the VETS–100/100A
                                                  Veterans Act (JVA) (Pub. L. 107–288).                   Reporting System regarding reports on                    Government procurement.


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   22:05 Sep 29, 2016   Jkt 238001   PO 00000   Frm 00007   Fmt 4701   Sfmt 4700   E:\FR\FM\30SER4.SGM   30SER4



Document Created: 2018-02-09 13:33:42
Document Modified: 2018-02-09 13:33:42
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionRules and Regulations
ActionFinal rule.
DatesEffective: September 30, 2016.
ContactMs. Cecelia L. Davis, Procurement Analyst, at 202-219-0202 for clarification of content. For information pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory Secretariat Division at 202-501-4755. Please cite FAC 2005-91, FAR Case 2015-011.
FR Citation81 FR 67728 
RIN Number9000-AN05
CFR Citation48 CFR 12
48 CFR 1
48 CFR 4
48 CFR 52
48 CFR 9

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR