81 FR 67913 - Safety Zone; 100th Ore Dock Anniversary Celebration; Chequamegon Bay, Ashland, WI

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 191 (October 3, 2016)

Page Range		67913-67915
FR Document		2016-23712

The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone within Chequamegon Bay in Ashland, WI. This safety zone is intended to restrict vessels from specified waters in Chequamegon Bay during the 100th Ore Dock Anniversary Celebration Fireworks Display. This safety zone is necessary to protect spectators from the hazards associated with the fireworks display.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 191 (Monday, October 3, 2016)

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 191 (Monday, October 3, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67913-67915]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23712]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0918]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; 100th Ore Dock Anniversary Celebration; Chequamegon 
Bay, Ashland, WI

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone within 
Chequamegon Bay in Ashland, WI. This safety zone is intended to 
restrict vessels from specified waters in Chequamegon Bay during the 
100th Ore Dock Anniversary Celebration Fireworks Display. This safety 
zone is necessary to protect spectators from the hazards associated 
with the fireworks display.

DATES: This rule is effective from 6:30 p.m. through 7:30 p.m. on 
October 1, 2016.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0918 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open 
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade John Mack, Waterways management, 
MSU Duluth, Coast Guard; telephone 218-725-3818, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice 
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of 
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because doing so would be impracticable and 
contrary to the public interest. The event sponsor notified the Coast 
Guard on September 26, 2016 that the fireworks display will be held on 
October 1, 2016, accordingly there is insufficient time to accommodate 
the comment period. Thus, delaying the effective date of this rule to 
wait for the comment period to run would be both impracticable and 
contrary to public interest because it would inhibit the Coast Guard's 
ability to protect spectators and vessels from the hazards associated 
with the event.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast 
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30 
days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective 
date of this rule would be contrary to public interest as it would 
inhibit the Coast Guard's ability to protect spectator and vessels from 
the hazards associated with the event.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C. 
1231. The Captain of the Port Duluth (COTP) has determined that 
potential hazards associated with fireworks displays starting after 
6:30 p.m. on October 1, 2016 will be a safety concern for anyone within 
a 420-foot radius of the launch site. The likely combination of 
recreational vessels, darkness punctuated by bright flashes of light, 
and fireworks debris falling into the water presents risks of 
collisions which could result in serious injuries or fatalities. This 
rule is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine 
environment in the navigable waters within the safety zone during the 
fireworks display.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone from 6:30 p.m. through 7:30 
p.m. October 1, 2016. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters 
within an area bounded by a circle with a 420-foot radius of the 
fireworks display launching site located in Ashland, WI at coordinates 
46[deg]36'02'' N., 090[deg]52'49'' W. The duration of the zone is 
intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in 
these navigable waters during the fireworks display. No vessel or 
person will be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining 
permission from the COTP or a designated representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive order related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of 
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing 
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated 
a ``significant regulatory

[[Page 67914]]

action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, it has not been 
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
location, duration, and time-of-year of the safety zone. Vessel traffic 
will be able to safely transit around this safety zone which will 
impact a small designated area of Superior Bay in Superior, WI for 1 
hour and during a time of year when commercial vessel traffic is 
normally low. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to 
Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about the zone and the rule 
allows vessels to seek permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule 
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any 
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If 
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, 
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves a safety zone lasting no more than 1 hour that will 
prohibit entry within a 420-foot radius from where a fireworks display 
will be conducted. It is categorically excluded from further review 
under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An 
environmental analysis checklist supporting this determination and a 
Categorical Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where 
indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may 
lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this 
rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that 
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and record 
keeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
0170.1.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0918 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T09-0834  Safety zone; 100th Ore Dock Anniversary Celebration 
Fireworks Display, Chequamegon Bay, Ashland, WI.

    (a) Location. All waters of Chequamegon Bay within an area bounded 
by a circle with a 420-foot radius at position 46[deg]36'02'' N., 
090[deg]52'49'' W.
    (b) Effective period. This safety zone is effective from 6:30 p.m. 
through 7:30 p.m. on October 1, 2016.
    (c) Regulations.
    (1) In accordance with the general regulations in Sec.  165.23 of 
this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety zone 
is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Duluth, or 
his designated on-scene representative.

[[Page 67915]]

    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may 
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Duluth or his designated on-
scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port is 
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been 
designated by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. The on-
scene representative of the Captain of the Port will be aboard either a 
Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the Port or 
his designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 
16.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety 
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Duluth or his on-scene 
representative to obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators given 
permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply with all 
directions given to them by the Captain of the Port Duluth or his on-
scene representative.

    Dated: September 27, 2016.
E.E. Williams,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Duluth.
[FR Doc. 2016-23712 Filed 9-30-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

67914 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations

action,’’ under Executive Order 12866. small entities that question or complain significant effect on the human
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed about this rule or any policy or action environment. This rule involves a safety
by the Office of Management and of the Coast Guard. zone lasting no more than 1 hour that
Budget. will prohibit entry within a 420-foot
This regulatory action determination C. Collection of Information
radius from where a fireworks display
is based on the size, location, duration, This rule will not call for a new will be conducted. It is categorically
and time-of-year of the safety zone. collection of information under the excluded from further review under
Vessel traffic will be able to safely Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the
transit around this safety zone which U.S.C. 3501–3520). Commandant Instruction. An
will impact a small designated area of environmental analysis checklist
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Superior Bay in Superior, WI for 1 hour supporting this determination and a
Governments
and during a time of year when Categorical Exclusion Determination are
commercial vessel traffic is normally A rule has implications for federalism available in the docket where indicated
low. Moreover, the Coast Guard will under Executive Order 13132, under ADDRESSES. We seek any
issue Broadcast Notice to Mariners via Federalism, if it has a substantial direct comments or information that may lead
VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the effect on the States, on the relationship to the discovery of a significant
zone and the rule allows vessels to seek between the national government and environmental impact from this rule.
permission to enter the zone. the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the G. Protest Activities
B. Impact on Small Entities various levels of government. We have The Coast Guard respects the First
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of analyzed this rule under that Order and Amendment rights of protesters.
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, have determined that it is consistent Protesters are asked to contact the
requires Federal agencies to consider with the fundamental federalism person listed in the FOR FURTHER
the potential impact of regulations on principles and preemption requirements INFORMATION CONTACT section to
small entities during rulemaking. The described in Executive Order 13132. coordinate protest activities so that your
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small Also, this rule does not have tribal message can be received without
businesses, not-for-profit organizations implications under Executive Order jeopardizing the safety or security of
that are independently owned and 13175, Consultation and Coordination people, places or vessels.
operated and are not dominant in their with Indian Tribal Governments,
fields, and governmental jurisdictions because it does not have a substantial List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
with populations of less than 50,000. direct effect on one or more Indian Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. tribes, on the relationship between the (water), Reporting and record keeping
605(b) that this rule will not have a Federal Government and Indian tribes, requirements, Security measures,
significant economic impact on a or on the distribution of power and Waterways.
substantial number of small entities. responsibilities between the Federal For the reasons discussed in the
While some owners or operators of Government and Indian tribes. If you preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
vessels intending to transit the safety believe this rule has implications for CFR part 165 as follows:
zone may be small entities, for the federalism or Indian tribes, please
reasons stated in section V.A above, this contact the person listed in the FOR PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
rule will not have a significant FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
economic impact on any vessel owner above.
or operator. ■ 1. The authority citation for Part 165
Under section 213(a) of the Small E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act continues to read as follows:
Business Regulatory Enforcement The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
we want to assist small entities in Federal agencies to assess the effects of Department of Homeland Security Delegation
understanding this rule. If the rule their discretionary regulatory actions. In No. 0170.1.
would affect your small business, particular, the Act addresses actions ■ 2. Add § 165.T09–0918 to read as
organization, or governmental that may result in the expenditure by a follows:
jurisdiction and you have questions State, local, or tribal government, in the
concerning its provisions or options for aggregate, or by the private sector of § 165.T09–0834 Safety zone; 100th Ore
compliance, please contact the person $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or Dock Anniversary Celebration Fireworks
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION more in any one year. Though this rule Display, Chequamegon Bay, Ashland, WI.
CONTACT section. will not result in such an expenditure, (a) Location. All waters of
Small businesses may send comments we do discuss the effects of this rule Chequamegon Bay within an area
on the actions of Federal employees elsewhere in this preamble. bounded by a circle with a 420-foot
who enforce, or otherwise determine radius at position 46°36′02″ N.,
compliance with, Federal regulations to F. Environment 090°52′49″ W.
the Small Business and Agriculture We have analyzed this rule under (b) Effective period. This safety zone
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman Department of Homeland Security is effective from 6:30 p.m. through 7:30
and the Regional Small Business Management Directive 023–01 and p.m. on October 1, 2016.
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, (c) Regulations.
Ombudsman evaluates these actions which guide the Coast Guard in (1) In accordance with the general
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES

annually and rates each agency’s complying with the National regulations in § 165.23 of this part, entry
responsiveness to small business. If you Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 into, transiting, or anchoring within this
wish to comment on actions by U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have safety zone is prohibited unless
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– determined that this action is one of a authorized by the Captain of the Port
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The category of actions that do not Duluth, or his designated on-scene
Coast Guard will not retaliate against individually or cumulatively have a representative.

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:33 Sep 30, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03OCR1.SGM 03OCR1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 67915

(2) This safety zone is closed to all DATES: This direct final rule will be incorporate Federal permitting
vessel traffic, except as may be effective December 2, 2016, without requirements to address new
permitted by the Captain of the Port further notice, unless EPA receives construction projects that emit 100,000
Duluth or his designated on-scene adverse comment by November 2, 2016. tons per year or more of greenhouse
representative. If EPA receives adverse comment, we gases, as well as clarifying some rule
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of will publish a timely withdrawal of the text.
the Captain of the Port is any Coast direct final rule in the Federal Register In the third request dated August 31,
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty informing the public that the rule will 2012, the State of Missouri asked that
officer who has been designated by the not take effect. EPA amend the SIP to include recently
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, promulgated revisions to the state rule
The on-scene representative of the identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 10 CSR 10–6.065 in order to defer for a
Captain of the Port will be aboard either OAR–2016–0529, to http:// period of three years the application of
a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary www.regulations.gov. Follow the online Title V permitting to carbon dioxide
vessel. The Captain of the Port or his instructions for submitting comments. emissions from biogenic sources. In
designated on-scene representative may Once submitted, comments cannot be addition to the biogenic deferral
be contacted via VHF Channel 16. edited or removed from Regulations.gov. language, Missouri included non-
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter EPA may publish any comment received substantive edits and minor
or operate within the safety zone shall to its public docket. Do not submit administrative rule revisions in this
contact the Captain of the Port Duluth submission. For example, Missouri
electronically any information you
or his on-scene representative to obtain relabeled 10 CSR 10–6.065(3)(A)5 to 10
consider to be Confidential Business
permission to do so. Vessel operators CSR 10–6.065(3)(B), and reworded the
Information (CBI) or other information
given permission to enter or operate in following in that same subsection ‘‘40
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
the safety zone must comply with all CFR part 63, subpart EEE’’ to ‘‘40 CFR
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
directions given to them by the Captain 63, subpart EEE.’’
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
of the Port Duluth or his on-scene
comment. The written comment is On July 14, 2016, the State of
representative.
considered the official comment and Missouri modified the 2011 and 2012
Dated: September 27, 2016. should include discussion of all points requests in a letter to EPA. The letter
E.E. Williams, you wish to make. EPA will generally addresses the court directed revisions to
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of not consider comments or comment EPA’s GHG permitting provisions.
the Port Duluth. contents located outside of the primary Specifically, in the July 14, 2016, letter,
[FR Doc. 2016–23712 Filed 9–30–16; 8:45 am] submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or Missouri identified regulatory language
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P other file sharing system). For of the earlier submittals that it was
additional submission methods, the full withdrawing its request to EPA to
EPA public comment policy, approve into the SIP and notified EPA
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION information about CBI or multimedia that the state will update its rules in the
AGENCY submissions, and general guidance on future to remove those provisions. The
making effective comments, please visit State explained that these changes to
40 CFR Parts 52 and 70 http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ their earlier submittals are a result of
[EPA–R07–OAR–2016–0529; FRL–9953–34– commenting-epa-dockets. court decisions by the Supreme Court
Region 7] FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA,
Larry Gonzalez at (913) 551–7041, or by June 23, 2014) and the U.S. Court of
Approval of Missouri’s Air Quality email at gonzalez.larry@epa.gov. Appeals for the District of Columbia
Implementation Plans and Operating SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: (Coalition for Responsible Regulation,
Permits Program; Greenhouse Gas Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ Inc. et al. v. EPA, April 10, 2015), in
Tailoring Rule and Non-Substantive and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section which the courts vacated certain
Definition and Language Changes provides additional information by permitting requirements that were
addressing the following: included in Missouri’s August 8, 2011,
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
submission. In the July 2016 submittal,
Agency (EPA). I. What is being addressed in this document? the state clarified this earlier request to
ACTION: Direct final rule. II. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP revision been met?
EPA as follows:
SUMMARY: Environmental Protection III. What action is EPA taking? (1) Missouri requested that in 10 CSR
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final 10–6.060(8)(A), not include as part of
action to approve revisions to the I. What is being addressed in this the Missouri SIP the phrase ‘‘including
Missouri State Implementation Plan document? the revision published at 75 FR 31606–
(SIP) and the 40 CFR part 70 operating EPA is approving revisions to the 07 (effective August 2, 2010).’’ Instead
permits program. EPA is approving Missouri SIP and Operating Permits subsection (8)(A) will read ‘‘. . .
revisions to two Missouri rule(s) Program requested from four separate promulgated as of July 1, 2009 are
entitled, ‘‘Construction Permits requests. In the first request dated hereby incorporated . . .’’
Required,’’ and ‘‘Operating Permits.’’ August 8, 2011, the State of Missouri (2) Missouri requested that in 10 CSR
This approval action is consistent with asked that EPA amend the SIP and the 10–6.6065(2)(A)2., not include the
the July 12, 2013, U.S. Court of Appeals state’s operating permits program to words ‘‘Except that:’’ and do not include
for the District of Columbia and the June the subparagraphs (2)(A)2.A. and
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES

include rule revisions that incorporate
23, 2014, U.S. Supreme Court actions Federal permitting requirements for (2)(A)2.B. as part of the Missouri SIP.
regarding Greenhouse Gas Prevention of greenhouse gas emissions under state In addition, Missouri requested that
Significant Deterioration and Title V rule 10 CSR 10–6.065. EPA only include into the Missouri SIP
Permitting. This action makes non- In the second request, also dated the non-substantive wording
substantive changes to definitions, and August 8, 2011, the State of Missouri clarifications submitted on August 31,
language clarifications. asked that EPA amend the SIP to 2012, without the biogenic deferral

VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:33 Sep 30, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03OCR1.SGM 03OCR1

Document Created: 2018-02-13 14:11:34
Document Modified: 2018-02-13 14:11:34

Category		Regulatory Information
Collection		Federal Register
sudoc Class		AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106:
Publisher		Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
Section		Rules and Regulations
Action		Temporary final rule.
Dates		This rule is effective from 6:30 p.m. through 7:30 p.m. on October 1, 2016.
Contact		If you have questions on this rule, call or email Lieutenant Junior Grade John Mack, Waterways management, MSU Duluth, Coast Guard; telephone 218-725-3818, email [email protected]
FR Citation		81 FR 67913
RIN Number		1625-AA00
CFR Associated		Harbors; Marine Safety; Navigation (water); Reporting and Record Keeping Requirements; Security Measures and Waterways

81 FR 67913 - Safety Zone; 100th Ore Dock Anniversary Celebration; Chequamegon Bay, Ashland, WI

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITYCoast Guard

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 191 (October 3, 2016)

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard