81 FR 67918 - Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants, State of Wyoming; Control of Emissions From Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerator Units, Plan Revision
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 191 (October 3, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 191 (October 3, 2016)
| Page Range | 67918-67920 | |
| FR Document | 2016-23584 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 191 (Monday, October 3, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 67918-67920] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-23584] [[Page 67918]] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 62 [EPA-R08-OAR-2016-0197; FRL-9953-13-Region 8] Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants, State of Wyoming; Control of Emissions From Existing Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerator Units, Plan Revision AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct final action to approve a revision to the Wyoming hospital/medical/ infectious waste incinerator (HMIWI) Section 111(d)/129 plan (the ``plan''). The plan was submitted to the EPA to fulfill requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and to implement and enforce the emissions guidelines (EG) for existing hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerators (HMIWI). The plan establishes emission limits; operator training and qualification requirements; performance testing, monitoring, and inspection requirements; and requirements for a waste management plan and reporting and recordkeeping requirements for existing hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerator units as specified in the October 6, 2009, amendments to the federal EG and New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), 40 CFR part 60, subparts Ce and Ec, respectively. DATES: This direct final rule is effective on December 2, 2016 without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse written comments by November 2, 2016. If adverse comments are received, the EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08- OAR-2016-0197 at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kendra Morrison, Air Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6145, [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Why is EPA using a direct final rule? The EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because we view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse comments. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the revision if adverse comments are received on this direct final rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. For further information about commenting on this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this document. If the EPA receives adverse comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that this direct final will not take effect. We would address all public comments in any subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. II. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA? A. Submitting Confidential Business Information (CBI). Do not submit CBI to EPA through http://www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information on a disk or CD ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. B. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments, remember to:Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register volume, date, and page number); Follow directions and organize your comments; Explain why you agree or disagree; Suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes; Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/or data that you used; If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced; Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and suggest alternatives; Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats; and, III. Background The EPA's statutory authority for the regulation of new and existing solid waste incineration units is outlined in the CAA sections 111 and 129. Section 129 of the CAA is specific to solid waste combustion, and requires the EPA to establish performance standards for each category of solid waste incineration units. Section 111 of the Act gives EPA the statutory authority to promulgate NSPS, applicable to new units, and/or EG for existing units. EG are implemented and enforced through either an EPA-approved state plan or a promulgated federal plan. Section 129(b)(2) requires states to submit to the EPA for approval state plans that implement and enforce the promulgated EG. Section 129(b)(3) requires the EPA to promulgate a federal plan (FP) within two years from the date on which the EG, or amendment, was promulgated. The FP is applicable to any affected facility if the state has failed to receive the EPA approval of the state plan, or revision. The FP acts as an enforcement place holder until the state submits and receives the EPA approval of its plan. State plan submittals must be consistent with the relevant emissions guidelines, in this instance 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ce, and the requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subpart B and part 62, subpart A. Section 129 of the CAA regulates the following substances or mixtures: Organics (dioxins/furans), carbon monoxide, metals (cadmium, lead, and mercury), acid gases (hydrogen chloride, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides) and [[Page 67919]] particulate matter (which includes opacity). The initial Wyoming plan for HMIWI units was approved by the EPA on August 21, 2000 (65 FR 38732). The plan approval is codified in 40 CFR part 62, subpart ZZ. On May 13, 2015, the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) submitted to the EPA a revised Section 111(d)/129 plan for HMIWI units. The DEQ made minor edits to the plan at the request of the EPA and the DEQ revised and resubmitted its submission to the EPA on November 24, 2015. The submitted plan revision was in response to the October 6, 2009 amendments to federal EG and NSPS requirements for HMIWI units, 40 CFR part 60, subparts Ce and Ec, respectively (74 FR 51367). This rulemaking action will supersede the EPA's August 21, 2000 (65 FR 38732) approval of Wyoming's initial plan. IV. Summary of Wyoming's HMIWI Plan Revision The EPA has reviewed the Wyoming HMIWI plan revision submittal in the context of the requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subparts B and Ce, as amended, and part 62, subpart A. The plan contained (1) a demonstration of Wyoming's legal authority to implement the plan; (2) identification and a copy of the state's adoption of Subpart Ce into rule Wyoming Air Quality Standards and Regulations (WAQSR) Chapter 4, Section 5, and Chapter 5 as the mechanism to enforce the emissions guidelines; (3) an inventory of one known designated facility and an inventory of its air emissions; (4) emission limits that are as protective as the emissions guidelines; (5) a final compliance date no later than October 6, 2014; (6) testing, monitoring, inspection, operator training and qualification, waste management plan, and recordkeeping and reporting requirements for the designated facilities; (7) documentation of public hearing(s) on the plan; (8) provisions to submit annual state progress reports to the EPA; and (9) a commitment to the EPA that all Title V operating permits, modifications, and renewals for designated facilities will specify all applicable state requirements and 40 CFR part 62, subpart ZZ. The submitted plan revision meets all requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subparts B and Ce, as amended, and part 62, subpart A. V. What action is the EPA taking today? The EPA is approving the Wyoming HMIWI Section 111(d)/129 plan revision that reflects amendments made to 40 CFR part 60, subparts Ce and Ec. Therefore, the EPA is amending 40 CFR part 62, subpart ZZ to reflect this action. This approval is based on the EPA's review of the plan, discussed above. This plan revision approval does not negate or void any of the initial August 21, 2000 plan approval requirements, including compliance dates for any affected facility. The scope of this plan revision approval is limited to the provisions of 40 CFR parts 60 and 62 for existing HMIWI units, as referenced in the EG, subpart Ce, and the related NSPS, subpart Ec, as amended. The EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because we view this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipate no adverse comments. However, in the Proposed Rules section of today's Federal Register publication, we are publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the revision if adverse comments are filed. This rule will be effective December 2, 2016 without further notice unless we receive adverse comments by November 2, 2016. If we receive adverse comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. VI. Statutory and Executive Orders Review Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a Section 111(d)/129 plan submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing Section 111(d)/129 plan submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state actions, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this direct final action merely approves some state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact in a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045(62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note)because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The state plan is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian Country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq, as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). [[Page 67920]] Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 2, 2016. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so that the EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Solid waste incineration, Hospital/medical/infectious waste incineration. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: May 17, 2016. Shaun L. McGrath, Regional Administrator, Region 8. 40 CFR part 62, subpart ZZ, is amended as follows: PART 62--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS 0 1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows: Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart ZZ--Wyoming 0 2. Section 62.12610 is revised to read as follows: Sec. 62.12610 Identification of plan. Section 111(d)/129 Plan for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators and the associated State regulation, Chapter 4, Section 5, and Chapter 5 of the Wyoming Air Quality Standards and Regulations, submitted by the State on September 7, 1999 and November 9, 1999, and as amended on May 13, 2015 and November 24, 2015. 0 3. Section 62.12611 is revised to read as follows: Sec. 62.12611 Identification of sources. The plan applies to each individual hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerator: (a) For which construction was commenced on or before June 20, 1996, or for which modification was commenced on or before March 16, 1998. (b) For which construction was commenced after June 20, 1996 but no later than December 1, 2008, or for which modification is commenced after March 16, 1998 but no later than April 6, 2010. 0 4. Section 62.12612 is revised to read as follows: Sec. 62.12612 Effective date. The effective date of the plan for hospital/medical/infectious waste incinerators is December 2, 2016. Editorial Note: This document was received for publication by the Office of the Federal Register on September 26, 2016. [FR Doc. 2016-23584 Filed 9-30-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![67918 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION official comment and should include disclosed except in accordance with
AGENCY discussion of all points you wish to procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
make. The EPA will generally not B. Tips for preparing your comments.
40 CFR Part 62 consider comments or comment When submitting comments, remember
[EPA–R08–OAR–2016–0197; FRL–9953–13– contents located outside of the primary to:
Region 8] submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or • Identify the rulemaking by docket
other file sharing system). For number and other identifying
Approval and Promulgation of State additional submission methods, the full information (subject heading, Federal
Plans for Designated Facilities and EPA public comment policy, Register volume, date, and page
Pollutants, State of Wyoming; Control information about CBI or multimedia number);
of Emissions From Existing Hospital/ submissions, and general guidance on • Follow directions and organize your
Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerator making effective comments, please visit comments;
Units, Plan Revision http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ • Explain why you agree or disagree;
commenting-epa-dockets. • Suggest alternatives and substitute
AGENCY: Environmental Protection language for your requested changes;
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Agency (EPA). • Describe any assumptions and
ACTION: Direct final rule. Kendra Morrison, Air Program, U.S. provide any technical information and/
Environmental Protection Agency, or data that you used;
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, • If you estimate potential costs or
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final Colorado 80202–1129, (303) 312–6145, burdens, explain how you arrived at
action to approve a revision to the morrison.kendra@epa.gov. your estimate in sufficient detail to
Wyoming hospital/medical/infectious SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: allow for it to be reproduced;
waste incinerator (HMIWI) Section • Provide specific examples to
111(d)/129 plan (the ‘‘plan’’). The plan I. Why is EPA using a direct final rule?
illustrate your concerns, and suggest
was submitted to the EPA to fulfill The EPA is publishing this rule alternatives;
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) without prior proposal because we view • Explain your views as clearly as
and to implement and enforce the this as a noncontroversial amendment possible, avoiding the use of profanity
emissions guidelines (EG) for existing and anticipate no adverse comments. or personal threats; and,
hospital/medical/infectious waste However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’
incinerators (HMIWI). The plan section of today’s Federal Register III. Background
establishes emission limits; operator publication, we are publishing a The EPA’s statutory authority for the
training and qualification requirements; separate document that will serve as the regulation of new and existing solid
performance testing, monitoring, and proposal to approve the revision if waste incineration units is outlined in
inspection requirements; and adverse comments are received on this the CAA sections 111 and 129. Section
requirements for a waste management direct final rule. We will not institute a 129 of the CAA is specific to solid waste
plan and reporting and recordkeeping second comment period on this action. combustion, and requires the EPA to
requirements for existing hospital/ Any parties interested in commenting establish performance standards for
medical/infectious waste incinerator must do so at this time. For further each category of solid waste
units as specified in the October 6, information about commenting on this incineration units. Section 111 of the
2009, amendments to the federal EG and rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this Act gives EPA the statutory authority to
New Source Performance Standards document. promulgate NSPS, applicable to new
(NSPS), 40 CFR part 60, subparts Ce and If the EPA receives adverse comment, units, and/or EG for existing units. EG
Ec, respectively. we will publish a timely withdrawal in are implemented and enforced through
DATES: This direct final rule is effective the Federal Register informing the either an EPA-approved state plan or a
on December 2, 2016 without further public that this direct final will not take promulgated federal plan. Section
notice, unless the EPA receives adverse effect. We would address all public 129(b)(2) requires states to submit to the
written comments by November 2, 2016. comments in any subsequent final rule EPA for approval state plans that
If adverse comments are received, the based on the proposed rule. implement and enforce the promulgated
EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of EG. Section 129(b)(3) requires the EPA
the direct final rule in the Federal II. What should I consider as I prepare to promulgate a federal plan (FP) within
Register informing the public that the my comments for the EPA? two years from the date on which the
rule will not take effect. A. Submitting Confidential Business EG, or amendment, was promulgated.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, Information (CBI). Do not submit CBI to The FP is applicable to any affected
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08– EPA through http://www.regulations.gov facility if the state has failed to receive
OAR–2016–0197 at http:// or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the EPA approval of the state plan, or
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online the information that you claim to be revision. The FP acts as an enforcement
instructions for submitting comments. CBI. For CBI information on a disk or place holder until the state submits and
Once submitted, comments cannot be CD ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark receives the EPA approval of its plan.
edited or removed from Regulations.gov. the outside of the disk or CD ROM as State plan submittals must be consistent
The EPA may publish any comment CBI and then identify electronically with the relevant emissions guidelines,
received to its public docket. Do not within the disk or CD ROM the specific in this instance 40 CFR part 60, subpart
submit electronically any information information that is claimed as CBI. In Ce, and the requirements of 40 CFR part
you consider to be Confidential addition to one complete version of the 60, subpart B and part 62, subpart A.
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Business Information (CBI) or other comment that includes information Section 129 of the CAA regulates the
information whose disclosure is claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment following substances or mixtures:
restricted by statute. Multimedia that does not contain the information Organics (dioxins/furans), carbon
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be claimed as CBI must be submitted for monoxide, metals (cadmium, lead, and
accompanied by a written comment. inclusion in the public docket. mercury), acid gases (hydrogen chloride,
The written comment is considered the Information so marked will not be sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides) and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:33 Sep 30, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03OCR1.SGM 03OCR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_68109/page/1.svg)
![67920 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 191 / Monday, October 3, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean § 62.12611 Identification of sources. available at http://www.regulations.gov
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of The plan applies to each individual or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
this action must be filed in the United hospital/medical/infectious waste Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
States Court of Appeals for the incinerator: in the Environmental Protection Agency
appropriate circuit by December 2, (a) For which construction was Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
2016. Filing a petition for commenced on or before June 20, 1996, Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
reconsideration by the Administrator of or for which modification was Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
this final rule does not affect the finality commenced on or before March 16, 20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
of this action for the purposes of judicial 1998. is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
review nor does it extend the time (b) For which construction was Monday through Friday, excluding legal
within which a petition for judicial commenced after June 20, 1996 but no holidays. The telephone number for the
review may be filed, and shall not later than December 1, 2008, or for Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
postpone the effectiveness of such rule which modification is commenced after and the telephone number for the OPP
or action. Parties with objections to this March 16, 1998 but no later than April Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
direct final rule are encouraged to file a 6, 2010. the visitor instructions and additional
comment in response to the parallel ■ 4. Section 62.12612 is revised to read information about the docket available
notice of proposed rulemaking for this as follows: at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
action published in the proposed rules FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
section of today’s Federal Register, § 62.12612 Effective date. Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
rather than file an immediate petition The effective date of the plan for Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),
for judicial review of this direct final hospital/medical/infectious waste Office of Pesticide Programs,
rule, so that the EPA can withdraw this incinerators is December 2, 2016. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
direct final rule and address the Editorial Note: This document was Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington,
comment in the proposed rulemaking. received for publication by the Office of the DC 20460–0001; main telephone
This action may not be challenged later Federal Register on September 26, 2016. number: (703) 305–7090; email address:
in proceedings to enforce its [FR Doc. 2016–23584 Filed 9–30–16; 8:45 am] BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov.
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) BILLING CODE 6560–50–P SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62 I. General Information
Environmental protection, Air ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION A. Does this action apply to me?
pollution control, Solid waste AGENCY You may be potentially affected by
incineration, Hospital/medical/
40 CFR Part 180 this action if you are an agricultural
infectious waste incineration.
producer, food manufacturer, or
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. [EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0920; FRL–9947–92] pesticide manufacturer. The following
Dated: May 17, 2016. list of North American Industrial
Bacillus Mycoides Isolate J; Exemption Classification System (NAICS) codes is
Shaun L. McGrath, From the Requirement of a Tolerance
Regional Administrator, Region 8. not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
AGENCY: Environmental Protection provides a guide to help readers
40 CFR part 62, subpart ZZ, is Agency (EPA). determine whether this document
amended as follows: applies to them. Potentially affected
ACTION: Final rule.
entities may include:
PART 62—APPROVAL AND SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an • Crop production (NAICS code 111).
PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS exemption from the requirement of a • Animal production (NAICS code
FOR DESIGNATED FACILITIES AND tolerance for residues of Bacillus 112).
POLLUTANTS mycoides isolate J in or on all • Food manufacturing (NAICS code
agricultural commodities when used in 311).
■ 1. The authority citation for part 62 accordance with label directions and • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
continues to read as follows: good agricultural practices. Certis USA code 32532).
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. LLC submitted a petition to EPA under B. How can I get electronic access to
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic other related information?
Subpart ZZ—Wyoming Act (FFDCA), requesting an exemption
You may access a frequently updated
from the requirement of a tolerance.
■ 2. Section 62.12610 is revised to read electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
This regulation eliminates the need to
as follows: through the Government Printing
establish a maximum permissible level
Office’s e-CFR site at http://
§ 62.12610 Identification of plan.
for residues of Bacillus mycoides isolate
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-
J under FFDCA.
Section 111(d)/129 Plan for Hospital/ idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
DATES: This regulation is effective 40tab_02.tpl.
Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators October 3, 2016. Objections and
and the associated State regulation, requests for hearings must be received C. How can I file an objection or hearing
Chapter 4, Section 5, and Chapter 5 of on or before December 2, 2016, and request?
the Wyoming Air Quality Standards and must be filed in accordance with the Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Regulations, submitted by the State on instructions provided in 40 CFR part U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an
September 7, 1999 and November 9, 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the objection to any aspect of this regulation
1999, and as amended on May 13, 2015 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). and may also request a hearing on those
and November 24, 2015.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, objections. You must file your objection
■ 3. Section 62.12611 is revised to read identified by docket identification (ID) or request a hearing on this regulation
as follows: number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0920, is in accordance with the instructions
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:23 Sep 30, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\03OCR1.SGM 03OCR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_68109/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-13 14:11:36
Document Modified: 2018-02-13 14:11:36
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Direct final rule. | |
| Dates | This direct final rule is effective on December 2, 2016 without further notice, unless the EPA receives adverse written comments by November 2, 2016. If adverse comments are received, the EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. | |
| Contact | Kendra Morrison, Air Program, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6145, [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 67918 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Solid Waste Incineration and Hospital/medical/infectious Waste Incineration |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR