81_FR_68646 81 FR 68454 - Certain Recombinant Factor VIII Products; Notice of Commission Determination To Grant a Joint Motion To Terminate the Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement; Termination of the Investigation

81 FR 68454 - Certain Recombinant Factor VIII Products; Notice of Commission Determination To Grant a Joint Motion To Terminate the Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement; Termination of the Investigation

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 192 (October 4, 2016)

Page Range68454-68454
FR Document2016-23864

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to grant a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation based on a settlement agreement.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 192 (Tuesday, October 4, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 192 (Tuesday, October 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 68454]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23864]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-956]


Certain Recombinant Factor VIII Products; Notice of Commission 
Determination To Grant a Joint Motion To Terminate the Investigation on 
the Basis of a Settlement Agreement; Termination of the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined to grant a joint motion to terminate the 
above-captioned investigation based on a settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Traud, Office of the General 
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 
Washington, DC 20436, (202) 205-3427. Copies of non-confidential 
documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be 
available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 
5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, (202) 205-2000. 
General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained at 
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docketing system (EDIS) at 
https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that 
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal at (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 22, 2015, the Commission instituted 
this investigation pursuant to Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended, based on a complaint filed by Baxter Healthcare Corporation 
and Baxter Healthcare SA, both of Deerfield, Illinois. 80 FR 29745 (May 
22, 2015). Baxalta Inc., Baxalta US Inc., and Baxalta GmbH were added 
as complainants after the filing of the complaint. 80 FR 62569 (Oct. 
16, 2015). (The complainants are collectively referred to as 
``Baxter.'') The Commission sought to determine whether there is a 
violation of Section 337(a)(1)(B) in the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation into the United States, or the sale 
within the United States after importation of certain recombinant 
factor VIII products by reason of infringement of any of claims 19-21, 
36, 37, and 39 of U.S. Patent No. 6,100,061 (``the '061 patent''); 
claims 20 and 21 of U.S. Patent No. 6,936,441 (``the '441 patent''); 
and claims 1, 5, 8, 10, 14, and 18 of U.S. Patent No. 8,084,252 (``the 
'252 patent''). 80 FR at 29746. The Commission directed the ALJ to make 
findings of fact and provide a recommended determination with respect 
to the statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 
1337(d)(1), (f)(1), and (g)(1). Id. The notice of investigation named 
as respondents Novo Nordisk A/S of Bagsvaerd, Denmark and Novo Nordisk 
Inc., of Plainsboro, NJ (collectively, ``Novo Nordisk''). Id. The 
Office of Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'') is also a party to 
this investigation. Id.
    On December 8, 2015, Baxter moved for partial termination of this 
investigation based on the withdrawal of claims 21, 36, 37, and 39 of 
the '061 patent; claims 1 and 10 of the '252 patent; and claims 20 and 
21 of the '441 patent. That motion was granted, leaving only claims 19 
and 20 of the '061 and claims 5, 8, 14, and 18 of the '252 patent at 
issue. Order No. 23 (Dec. 10, 2016), unreviewed, Notice of Commission 
Determination Not to Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion 
for Partial Termination of the Investigation with Respect to Certain 
Claims (Jan. 5, 2016).
    On February 26, 2016, the ALJ issued an initial determination 
(``the Summary ID'') (Order No. 30), which concluded that Novo Nordisk 
infringed the `061 patent. Novo Nordisk filed a petition requesting 
that the Commission review the Summary ID and related claim 
construction orders. The Commission determined to defer its decision on 
whether to review those orders until the date on which the Commission 
determines whether to review the ALJ's final ID (``the Final ID''). 
Notice of Comm'n Determination to Extend the Date for Determining 
Whether to Review a Non-Final Initial Determination Granting 
Complainants' Motion for Summary Determination that the Accused 
Products Infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,100,061 (Mar. 29, 2016).
    On May 27, 2016, the ALJ issued the Final ID, which found no 
violation of Section 337 as to either remaining asserted patent. On 
June 3, 2016, the ALJ issued the Recommended Determination on Remedy, 
Bonding, and the Public Interest, which contingently recommends both a 
limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order. The parties each 
petitioned for review of the Final ID. The Commission determined to 
review (1) the Summary ID's conclusion that the `061 patent is 
infringed (and the underlying claim constructions); (2) the Final ID's 
conclusion that the asserted claims of the `061 patent are anticipated 
and obvious; and (3) the Final ID's conclusion that the economic prong 
of the domestic industry is not met as to both remaining patents. 81 FR 
51463, 51464 (Aug. 4, 2016). The Commission requested briefing on one 
issue under review and on remedy, the public interest, and bonding. Id. 
at 51464-65.
    On September 12, 2016, the private parties filed a Joint Motion to 
Terminate the Investigation Based on a Settlement Agreement (``the 
Motion'') and a confidential and a public version of the settlement 
agreement. On September 14, 2016, OUII filed a response supporting the 
Motion.
    The Commission has determined that the Motion complies with the 
requirements of section 210.21(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21(b)(1)), and that there are no 
extraordinary circumstances that would prevent the requested 
termination. The Commission also finds that granting the Motion would 
not be contrary to the public interest pursuant to section 210.50(b)(2) 
of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
210.50(b)(2)). Accordingly, the Commission hereby grants the Motion. 
This investigation is terminated.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 28, 2016.
Katherine M. Hiner,
Acting Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2016-23864 Filed 10-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P



                                                  68454                        Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 192 / Tuesday, October 4, 2016 / Notices

                                                  meals are the responsibility of the                     whether there is a violation of Section               contingently recommends both a limited
                                                  participating public.                                   337(a)(1)(B) in the importation into the              exclusion order and a cease and desist
                                                                                                          United States, the sale for importation               order. The parties each petitioned for
                                                  Jenna Whitlock,
                                                                                                          into the United States, or the sale within            review of the Final ID. The Commission
                                                  Acting State Director.                                  the United States after importation of                determined to review (1) the Summary
                                                  [FR Doc. 2016–23937 Filed 10–3–16; 8:45 am]             certain recombinant factor VIII products              ID’s conclusion that the ‘061 patent is
                                                  BILLING CODE 4310–DQ–P                                  by reason of infringement of any of                   infringed (and the underlying claim
                                                                                                          claims 19–21, 36, 37, and 39 of U.S.                  constructions); (2) the Final ID’s
                                                                                                          Patent No. 6,100,061 (‘‘the ’061 patent’’);           conclusion that the asserted claims of
                                                  INTERNATIONAL TRADE                                     claims 20 and 21 of U.S. Patent No.
                                                                                                                                                                the ‘061 patent are anticipated and
                                                  COMMISSION                                              6,936,441 (‘‘the ’441 patent’’); and
                                                                                                                                                                obvious; and (3) the Final ID’s
                                                                                                          claims 1, 5, 8, 10, 14, and 18 of U.S.
                                                  [Investigation No. 337–TA–956]
                                                                                                          Patent No. 8,084,252 (‘‘the ’252 patent’’).           conclusion that the economic prong of
                                                                                                          80 FR at 29746. The Commission                        the domestic industry is not met as to
                                                  Certain Recombinant Factor VIII                                                                               both remaining patents. 81 FR 51463,
                                                  Products; Notice of Commission                          directed the ALJ to make findings of fact
                                                                                                          and provide a recommended                             51464 (Aug. 4, 2016). The Commission
                                                  Determination To Grant a Joint Motion                                                                         requested briefing on one issue under
                                                  To Terminate the Investigation on the                   determination with respect to the
                                                                                                          statutory public interest factors set forth           review and on remedy, the public
                                                  Basis of a Settlement Agreement;                                                                              interest, and bonding. Id. at 51464–65.
                                                                                                          in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), and (g)(1).
                                                  Termination of the Investigation
                                                                                                          Id. The notice of investigation named as                On September 12, 2016, the private
                                                  AGENCY: U.S. International Trade                        respondents Novo Nordisk A/S of                       parties filed a Joint Motion to Terminate
                                                  Commission.                                             Bagsvaerd, Denmark and Novo Nordisk                   the Investigation Based on a Settlement
                                                  ACTION: Notice.                                         Inc., of Plainsboro, NJ (collectively,                Agreement (‘‘the Motion’’) and a
                                                                                                          ‘‘Novo Nordisk’’). Id. The Office of                  confidential and a public version of the
                                                  SUMMARY:    Notice is hereby given that                 Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is            settlement agreement. On September 14,
                                                  the U.S. International Trade                            also a party to this investigation. Id.
                                                                                                             On December 8, 2015, Baxter moved                  2016, OUII filed a response supporting
                                                  Commission has determined to grant a
                                                                                                          for partial termination of this                       the Motion.
                                                  joint motion to terminate the above-
                                                  captioned investigation based on a                      investigation based on the withdrawal                   The Commission has determined that
                                                  settlement agreement.                                   of claims 21, 36, 37, and 39 of the ’061              the Motion complies with the
                                                  FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron                    patent; claims 1 and 10 of the ’252                   requirements of section 210.21(b)(1) of
                                                  Traud, Office of the General Counsel,                   patent; and claims 20 and 21 of the ’441              the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
                                                  U.S. International Trade Commission,                    patent. That motion was granted,                      Procedure (19 CFR 210.21(b)(1)), and
                                                  500 E Street SW., Washington, DC                        leaving only claims 19 and 20 of the                  that there are no extraordinary
                                                  20436, (202) 205–3427. Copies of non-                   ’061 and claims 5, 8, 14, and 18 of the               circumstances that would prevent the
                                                  confidential documents filed in                         ’252 patent at issue. Order No. 23 (Dec.              requested termination. The Commission
                                                  connection with this investigation are or               10, 2016), unreviewed, Notice of                      also finds that granting the Motion
                                                  will be available for inspection during                 Commission Determination Not to                       would not be contrary to the public
                                                                                                          Review an Initial Determination
                                                  official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15                                                                    interest pursuant to section 210.50(b)(2)
                                                                                                          Granting a Motion for Partial
                                                  p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.                                                                    of the Commission’s Rules of Practice
                                                                                                          Termination of the Investigation with
                                                  International Trade Commission, 500 E                                                                         and Procedure (19 CFR 210.50(b)(2)).
                                                                                                          Respect to Certain Claims (Jan. 5, 2016).
                                                  Street SW., Washington, DC 20436,                          On February 26, 2016, the ALJ issued               Accordingly, the Commission hereby
                                                  (202) 205–2000. General information                     an initial determination (‘‘the Summary               grants the Motion. This investigation is
                                                  concerning the Commission may also be                   ID’’) (Order No. 30), which concluded                 terminated.
                                                  obtained at https://www.usitc.gov. The                  that Novo Nordisk infringed the ‘061                    The authority for the Commission’s
                                                  public record for this investigation may                patent. Novo Nordisk filed a petition
                                                  be viewed on the Commission’s                                                                                 determination is contained in Section
                                                                                                          requesting that the Commission review                 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
                                                  electronic docketing system (EDIS) at                   the Summary ID and related claim
                                                  https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired                                                                      amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
                                                                                                          construction orders. The Commission                   210 of the Commission’s Rules of
                                                  persons are advised that information on                 determined to defer its decision on
                                                  this matter can be obtained by                                                                                Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
                                                                                                          whether to review those orders until the              210).
                                                  contacting the Commission’s TDD                         date on which the Commission
                                                  terminal at (202) 205–1810.                             determines whether to review the ALJ’s                  By order of the Commission.
                                                  SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May                       final ID (‘‘the Final ID’’). Notice of                  Issued: September 28, 2016.
                                                  22, 2015, the Commission instituted this                Comm’n Determination to Extend the                    Katherine M. Hiner,
                                                  investigation pursuant to Section 337 of                Date for Determining Whether to Review                Acting Supervisory Attorney.
                                                  the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,                     a Non-Final Initial Determination
                                                                                                                                                                [FR Doc. 2016–23864 Filed 10–3–16; 8:45 am]
                                                  based on a complaint filed by Baxter                    Granting Complainants’ Motion for
                                                  Healthcare Corporation and Baxter                       Summary Determination that the                        BILLING CODE 7020–02–P

                                                  Healthcare SA, both of Deerfield,                       Accused Products Infringe U.S. Patent
                                                  Illinois. 80 FR 29745 (May 22, 2015).                   No. 6,100,061 (Mar. 29, 2016).
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES




                                                  Baxalta Inc., Baxalta US Inc., and                         On May 27, 2016, the ALJ issued the
                                                  Baxalta GmbH were added as                              Final ID, which found no violation of
                                                  complainants after the filing of the                    Section 337 as to either remaining
                                                  complaint. 80 FR 62569 (Oct. 16, 2015).                 asserted patent. On June 3, 2016, the
                                                  (The complainants are collectively                      ALJ issued the Recommended
                                                  referred to as ‘‘Baxter.’’) The                         Determination on Remedy, Bonding,
                                                  Commission sought to determine                          and the Public Interest, which


                                             VerDate Sep<11>2014   19:01 Oct 03, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00057   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\04OCN1.SGM   04OCN1



Document Created: 2016-10-04 03:04:19
Document Modified: 2016-10-04 03:04:19
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
ActionNotice.
ContactRon Traud, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, (202) 205-3427. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docketing system (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal at (202) 205-1810.
FR Citation81 FR 68454 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR