81 FR 69874 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing of Partial Amendment No. 2 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Partial Amendment No. 2, To Amend Rule 67-Equities Relating to the Tick Size Pilot Program
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 195 (October 7, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 195 (October 7, 2016)
| Page Range | 69874-69877 | |
| FR Document | 2016-24283 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 195 (Friday, October 7, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 69874-69877] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-24283] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-79029; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2016-83] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing of Partial Amendment No. 2 and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Partial Amendment No. 2, To Amend Rule 67--Equities Relating to the Tick Size Pilot Program October 3, 2016. I. Introduction On August 25, 2016, NYSE MKT LLC (``Exchange'' or ``NYSE MKT'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to (1) change system functionality to implement the Plan to Implement a Tick Size Pilot Program (``Plan'' or ``Pilot'') \3\ submitted to the Commission pursuant to Rule 608 of Regulation NMS \4\ under the Act, (2) clarify the operation of certain exceptions to the Trade-at Prohibition \5\ on Pilot Securities in the Test Group Three, (3) amend the Limit Up/Limit Down (``LULD'' price controls set forth in Exchange Rule 80C--Equities regarding the Regulation NMS Plan to Address Extraordinary Market Volatility (``LULD Plan''),\6\ and (4) amend the Exchange's Trading Collars calculation in Exchange Rule 1000-Equities. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on September 15, 2016.\7\ The Commission received two comment letters on the proposal.\8\ On September 27, 2016, the [[Page 69875]] Exchange filed Partial Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change (``Amendment No. 1''). On September 30, 2016, the Exchange withdrew Amendment No. 1 and filed Partial Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change (``Amendment No. 2'').\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74892 (May 6, 2015), 80 FR 27513 (May 13, 2015) (``Approval Order''). Unless otherwise specified, capitalized terms used in this order are defined as set forth in the Plan. \4\ 17 CFR 242.608. \5\ Exchange Rule 67(e)(4)(A)--Equities defines the ``Trade-at Prohibition'' to mean the prohibition against executions by a Trading Center of a sell order for a Pilot Security at the price of a Protected Bid or the execution of a buy order for a Pilot Security at the price of a Protected Offer during regular trading hours. See also Plan Section I(LL) and Plan Section VI(D). \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091 (May 31, 2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (File No. 4-631). \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78803 (September 9, 2016), 81 FR 63552. \8\ See Letters from Eric Swanson, EVP, General Counsel, Bats Global Markets, Inc., Elizabeth K. King, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, New York Stock Exchange; and Thomas A. Wittman, EVP, Global Head of Equities, Nasdaq, Inc., dated September 9, 2016 (``Comment Letter No. 1''); and Eric Swanson, EVP, General Counsel, Bats Global Markets, Inc., dated September 12, 2016 (``Comment Letter No. 2''). \9\ In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange proposes to: (1) Specify that in all Pilot Securities, d-Quotes to buy (sell) would not exercise discretion if (A) exercising discretion would result in an execution equal to or higher (lower) than the price of a protected offer (bid) or (B) the price of a protected bid (offer) is equal to or higher (lower) than the filed price of the d-Quote; and (2) correct cross references. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This order provides notice of Amendment No. 2 and approves the proposal, as modified by Amendment No. 2, on an accelerated basis. II. Description of the Amended Proposal The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 67--Equities to (1) change system functionality to implement the Plan; (2) clarify the operation of certain exceptions to the Trade-at Prohibition on Pilot Securities in Test Group Three; (3) amend the LULD price controls set forth in Exchange Rule 80C--Equities; and (4) amend the Exchange's trading collar calculation set forth in Exchange Rule 1000 Equities. A. Amendments to Exchange Systems Functionality To Implement the Plan 1. Trade-at Intermarket Sweep Orders \10\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See proposed Exchange Rule 67(f)(1). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes to accept Trade-at Intermarket Sweep Orders (``TAISO'') in all securities, and that TAISOs must be designated as immediate or cancel (``IOC''), may include a minimum trade size, and do not route. The Exchange would immediately and automatically execute a TAISO against the displayed and non-displayed bid (offer) up to its full size in accordance with and to the extent provided by Exchange Rules 1000--Equities--1004--Equities and will then sweep the Exchange's book as provided in Rule 1000(e)(iii)--Equities. Any portion of the TAISO that is not executed would be immediately and automatically cancelled. The Exchange proposes to accept TAISOs before the Exchange opens and they would be eligible to participate in the opening transaction at its limit price. TAISOs would not be accepted during a trading halt or pause for participation in a reopening transaction. Finally, the Exchange would not allow TAISOs to be entered as e-Quotes, d-Quotes, or g-Quotes. 2. Pilot Securities in Test Groups One, Two, and Three \11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See proposed Exchange Rule 67(f)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes that references in Exchange rules to the minimum price variation (``MPV'') would mean the quoting minimum price variation specified in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) of Exchange Rule 67.\12\ The Exchange proposes that pre-opening indications,\13\ would be published in $0.05 pricing increments for Pilot Securities in Test Groups One, Two, and Three.\14\ Mid-Point Passive Liquidity (``MPL'') Orders, which are undisplayed limit orders that automatically execute at the mid-point of the protected best bid (``PBB'') and the protected best offer (``PBO''),\15\ must be entered with a limit price in a $0.05 pricing increment.\16\ Trading collars that are not in the trading MPV for the security would be moved to the nearest price in the trading MPV for the security.\17\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See proposed Exchange Rule 67(f)(2)(A). \13\ Rule 15(a)--Equities provides that pre-opening indications will include the security and the price range within which the opening price is anticipated to occur and will be published via the securities information processor and proprietary data feeds. \14\ See proposed Exchange Rule 67(f)(2)(B). \15\ See Rule 13(d)(1)(A)--Equities. \16\ See proposed Exchange Rule 67(f)(2)(C). \17\ See proposed Exchange Rule 67(f)(2)(D). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. Pilot Securities in Test Groups Two and Three \18\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \18\ See proposed Exchange Rule 67(f)(3). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes that Retail Price Improvement Orders (``RPI'') for Pilot Securities in Test Groups Two and Three must be entered with a limit price and an offset in a $0.005 pricing increment. 4. Pilot Securities in Test Group Three \19\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ See proposed Exchange Rule 67(f)(4). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes procedures for handling, executing, re- pricing and displaying of certain order types and order type instructions applicable to Pilot Securities in Test Group Three. a. Change in Priority \20\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \20\ See proposed Exchange Rule 67(f)(4)(A). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes that an incoming automatically executing order to sell (buy) will trade with displayable bids (offers) and route to protected bids (offers) before trading with an unexecuted Market Order held undisplayed at the same price. After trading or routing, or both, any remaining balance of such an incoming automatically executing order would satisfy any unexecuted Market Orders in time priority before trading with non-displayable interest on parity. b. ISOs \21\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \21\ See proposed Exchange Rule 67(f)(4)(B). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes that, on entry, Day ISOs would be eligible for the TAISO exception set forth in proposed Rule 67(e)(4)(C)(ix). In addition, an IOC ISO to buy (sell) would not trade with non-displayed interest to sell (buy) that is the same price as a protected offer (bid) unless the limit price of such IOC ISO is higher (lower) than the price of the protected offer (bid). c. Non-Displayed Resting Orders \22\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ See proposed Exchange Rule 67(f)(4)(C). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes restrictions applicable to resting non- displayed interest, i.e., a resting order to buy (sell) that is not displayed at the price at which it is eligible to trade. Resting non- displayed interest on the Exchange could include Non-Display Reserve Orders,\23\ Non-Display Reserve e-Quotes,\24\ the reserve interest of Minimum Display Reserve Orders and Minimum Display Reserve e- Quotes,\25\ and pegging interest that is not displayed.\26\ The proposed rule changes are intended to assure that these orders would not price match a protected quotation. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \23\ A ``Non Displayed Reserve Order'' is a Limit Order that is not displayed, but remains available for potential execution against all incoming automatically executing orders until executed in full or cancelled. See Rule 13(d)(1)(A)--Equities. \24\ See Rule 70(f)(ii)--Equities. \25\ A ``Minimum Display Reserve Order'' is a Limit Order that will have a portion of the interest displayed when the order is or becomes the Exchange BBO and a portion of the interest (``reserve interest'') that is not displayed. See Rules 13(d)(2)(C)--Equities and 70(f)(i)--Equities. \26\ See Rule 13(f)(1)(A)--Equities (Pegging interest includes non-displayable interest to buy or sell at a price to track the same-side PBBO). d-Quotes enable Floor brokers to enter discretionary instructions as to the price at which the d-Quote may trade and the number of shares to which the discretionary price instructions apply. Executions of d-Quotes within a discretionary pricing instruction range are considered non-displayable interest for purposes of Rule 72--Equities. See Rule 70.25(a)(ii)--Equities. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- First, the Exchange proposes that resting non-displayed interest to buy (sell) would not trade at the price of a protected offer (bid). Second, a resting non-displayed order to buy (sell) would not trade at the price of a protected bid (offer) unless the incoming order to sell (buy) is a TAISO, Day ISO, or IOC ISO that has a limit price lower (higher) than the price of the non-displayed interest. Finally, the Exchange proposes that resting non-displayed interest will be either routed, cancelled, or re-priced, consistent with the terms of the order. [[Page 69876]] d. Block Size Exception to the Trade-at Prohibition \27\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \27\ See proposed Exchange Rule 67(f)(4)(E). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes that only buy and sell orders that are entered into the Cross Function pursuant to Supplementary Material .10 to Rule 76--Equities and that satisfy the Block Size definition would be eligible for the Block Size exception to the Trade-at Prohibition. e. Self-Trade Prevention Modifiers \28\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \28\ See proposed Exchange Rule 67(f)(4)(F). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes that incoming orders designated with a specific self-trade prevention (``STP'') Modifier, STPN, would cancel before routing or trading with non-displayed orders if the opposite- side resting interest marked with an STP modifier with the same market participant identifier (``MPID'') is a displayed order. f. G-Quotes and Buy Minus/Zero Plus Orders \29\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \29\ See proposed Exchange Rule 67(f)(4)(G). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes to reject g-Quotes and Buy Minus/Zero Plus Orders. 5. d-Quotes \30\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \30\ See proposed Exchange Rule 67(f)(5). See also Amendment No. 2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes that in all Pilot Securities, d-Quotes to buy (sell) would not exercise discretion if (i) exercising discretion would result in an execution equal to or higher (lower) than the price of a protected offer (bid), or (ii) the price of a protected bid (offer) is equal to or higher (lower) than the filed price of the d-Quote. B. Operation of Certain Exceptions to the Trade-at Prohibition on Pilot Securities in Test Group Three 1. TAISOs \31\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \31\ See proposed Exchange Rule 67(a)(1)(D) and proposed Exchange Rule 67(e)(4)(C)(x). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes to add the phrase ``or Intermarket Sweep Orders'' to the definition of TAISO as well as to the TAISO exception to the Trade-at Prohibition to clarify that ISOs may be routed to execute against the full displayed size of the Protected Quotation that was traded at.\32\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \32\ The Exchange also proposes to add the word ``display'' to Exchange Rule 67(a)(1)(D) to correct a previous omission. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2. Block Size Exemption to Trade-at Prohibition \33\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \33\ See proposed Exchange Rule 67(e)(4)(C)(iii). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes to amend the Block Size exception to the Trade-at Prohibition to allow execution on multiple Trading Centers to comply with Regulation NMS. C. LULD Price Bands The Exchange proposes to add a new subsection (8) to Rule 80C(a)-- Equities that would specify that, after the Exchange opens or reopens an Exchange-listed security but before receiving Price Bands from the Securities Information Processor (``SIP'') under the LULD Plan, the Exchange would calculate Price Bands based on the first Reference Price provided to the SIP and, if such Price Bands are not in the MPV for the security, round such Price Bands to the nearest price at the applicable MPV. D. Trading Collars Rounding \34\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \34\ See proposed Exchange Rule 1000--Equities (c)(i). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes that Trading Collars for both buy and sell orders that are not in the MPV for the security would be rounded down to the nearest price at the applicable MPV. III. Summary of Comment Letters Both comment letters express support for the proposed rule change and suggest that the Commission should approve the proposal. In Comment Letter No. 1, the commenters stated that if the proposal is approved as proposed, then NYSE would be able to meet the October 3, 2016 implementation date. Further, in Comment Letter No. 1, the commenters stated their belief that the requirements from the Commission have been unclear. In Comment Letter No. 2, the commenter questioned Commission staff's authority. IV. Discussion and Commission's Findings After careful review of the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 2, and the comment letters, the Commission finds that the proposal, as modified by Amendment No. 2, is consistent with the requirements of the Act, Rule 608 of Regulation NMS,\35\ and the rules and regulations thereunder that are applicable to a national securities exchange.\36\ Specifically, the Commission finds that the rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, which requires that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed, among other things, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and to protect investors and the public interest; and are not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \35\ 17 CFR 242.608. \36\ In approving this rule change, the Commission has considered the rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As noted in the Approval Order, the Plan is by design, an objective, data-driven test to evaluate how a wider tick size would impact trading, liquidity, and market quality of securities of smaller capitalization companies. In addition, the Plan is designed with three Test Groups and a Control Group, to allow analysis and comparison of incremental market structure changes on the Pilot Securities and is designed to produce empirical data that could inform future policy decisions. As such, any proposed changes targeted at particular Test Groups during the Pilot Period should be necessary for compliance with the Plan. The Exchange proposes changes to modify how the Exchange will handle orders during the Pilot Period. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to accept TAISOs in all securities. In addition, the Exchange proposes to make changes to d-Quotes for all Pilot Securities by limiting instances when d-Quotes would exercise discretion.\37\ Further, for Pilot Securities in the Test Groups, the Exchange proposes to specify references to the MPV, provide that pre-opening indications would be published in $0.05 increments, require that MPL Orders with a limit price must be entered in a $0.05 increment, and clarify how Trading Collars that are not in the trading MPV would be handled. The Exchange also proposes to specify that Retail Price Improvement Orders must be entered with a limit price and an offset in a $0.005 pricing increment in Test Groups Two and Three. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \37\ See Amendment No. 2. The Exchange originally proposed to limit d-Quotes from exercising discretion only in Test Group Three. In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange proposes to apply the proposed limitation of discretion to all Pilot Securities. The Commission believes that the amendment to apply the proposed changes to the exercise of discretion by d-Quotes to all Pilot Securities modifies the proposal so that it does not have an unnecessary disparate impact on the different Test Groups and the Control Group. Thus, the Commission believes that the Exchange's proposal is consistent with the Pilot. The Exchange has committed to make the systems changes necessary to implement Amendment No. 2 no later than November 7, 2016. See Email from Clare Saperstein, Exchange to Kelly Riley, SEC date October 2, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange proposes changes for Pilot Securities in Test Group Three to comply with the Trade-at Prohibition, including a different priority for execution of resting orders, how certain ISOs would be handled in Test Group [[Page 69877]] Three, how resting non-displayed orders would trade, how order with a STPN Modifier would be handled, and that g-Quotes and Buy Minus/Zero Plus orders will be rejected. The Exchange also proposes to only permit buy and sell orders that are entered into the Cross Function pursuant to Supplementary Material .10 to Rule 76 to be eligible for the Block Size order exception to the Trade-at Prohibition.\38\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \38\ The Commission notes that the orders entered into the Cross Function for purposes of relying on the Block Size exception must satisfy the provisions of the exception, including that it may not be an aggregation of non-block orders, or broken into orders smaller than Block Size prior to submitting the order the Trading Center for execution. See Exchange Rule 67(e)(4)(C)(iii). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition, the Exchange proposes to amend provisions related to two exceptions to the Trade-at Prohibition. First, the Exchange proposes amend the TAISO definition to reflect that ISOs may be routed to the full displayed size of a Protected Quotation that is traded-at and to make the corresponding change to the specific trade-at exception. Second, the Exchange proposes to amend the exception for Block Size orders to allow an order of Block Size to be executed on multiple Trading Centers. The Commission believes that these changes are reasonably designed to comply with the Plan. Further, the Commission believes that the proposed changes that are targeted at particular Test Groups are necessary for compliance with the Plan. Accordingly, the Commission finds that these changes are consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \39\ and Rule 608 of Regulation NMS \40\ because they implement the Plan and clarify Exchange Rules. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \39\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). \40\ 17 CFR 242.608. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition, the Exchange proposes to adopt a rule to specify how the Exchange will calculate LULD Price Bands after the Exchange opens or reopens. The Commission believes that this change should help to ensure that trading does not occur outside of Price Bands when LULD is in effect. Finally, the Exchange proposes to specify that Trading Collars that are not in the MPV would be rounded down to the nearest price. The Commission believes that this change should provide clarity in the Exchange's rules. For these reasons, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 2, is consistent with the requirements of the Act and Rule 608 of Regulation NMS. V. Solicitation of Comments on Amendment No. 2 Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether Amendment No. 2 is consistent with the Exchange Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic CommentsUse the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or Send an email to rule-comments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2016-83 on the subject line. Paper Comments Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2016-83. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2016-83 and should be submitted on or before October 28, 2016. VI. Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 2 The Commission finds good cause to approve the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 2, prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of notice of Amendment No. 2 in the Federal Register. As described above, the Exchange proposes to amend its rules to comply with the Plan and clarify other rules related to LULD and Trading Collars. The Commission believes that the proposals related to LULD Price Bands and Trading Collars should provide clarity on instances where they are not in the MPV. The Commission believes that the proposals related to the Pilot are designed to ensure compliance with the Plan. The Commission notes that the Pilot is scheduled to start on October 3, 2016, and accelerated approval would ensure that the rules of the Exchange would be in place for the start of the Pilot. Accordingly, the Commission finds good cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\41\ to approve the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 2, on an accelerated basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \41\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- VII. Conclusion It is therefore ordered that, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\42\ the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEMKT-2016-83), as modified by Amendment No. 2, be and hereby is approved on an accelerated basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \42\ Id. \43\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\43\ Robert W. Errett, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016-24283 Filed 10-6-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![69874 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2016 / Notices
Consumers may also benefit from response by mail, please allow sufficient SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
increased competition. If consumers time for mail processing. COMMISSION
cannot switch easily between platforms, Instructions: Response to this RFI is [Release No. 34–79029; File No. SR–
then it may be difficult for would-be voluntary. Responses exceeding 5,000 NYSEMKT–2016–83]
services to enter the market, potentially words will not be considered.
resulting in less innovation or higher Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Respondents need not comment on all
prices. Increasing data portability may MKT LLC; Notice of Filing of Partial
topics; however, they should clearly
induce businesses to compete with one Amendment No. 2 and Order Granting
another to offer better prices and higher indicate the number of each topic to
which they are responding (please see Accelerated Approval of a Proposed
quality services so as to win or retain a Rule Change, as Modified by Partial
customer’s business. Service providers, Supplementary Information for list of
Amendment No. 2, To Amend Rule
meanwhile, can benefit from offering topics). Brevity is appreciated.
67—Equities Relating to the Tick Size
data portability to increase user trust Responses to this RFI may be posted
Pilot Program
through the transparency and ease of without change online. OSTP therefore
switching data portability provides, and requests that no business proprietary October 3, 2016.
to help manage the termination of information or personally identifiable I. Introduction
services. Finally, the public benefits information be submitted in response to
when data portability increases this RFI. Please note that the U.S. On August 25, 2016, NYSE MKT LLC
competition, provides some sense of Government will not pay for response (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE MKT’’) filed
accountability, and promotes preparation, or for the use of any with the Securities and Exchange
transparency as to what information a information contained in the response. Commission (‘‘Commission’’) pursuant
provider is holding. to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Disclaimer: Responses to this RFI will Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
Others may point to potential private not be returned. The Office of Science
and public downsides. With lower 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
and Technology Policy is under no change to (1) change system
switching costs, businesses might adjust
obligation to acknowledge receipt of the functionality to implement the Plan to
their business models and become more
information received, or to provide Implement a Tick Size Pilot Program
selective in their initial customer
acquisition strategy or invest less in feedback to respondents with respect to (‘‘Plan’’ or ‘‘Pilot’’) 3 submitted to the
their customer relationships, which any information submitted under this Commission pursuant to Rule 608 of
might leave some sets of customers RFI. Regulation NMS 4 under the Act, (2)
worse off than before. Some privacy and clarify the operation of certain
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: exceptions to the Trade-at Prohibition 5
security advocates also worry that the Alexander Macgillivray (202) 494–0085.
strength of data portability—easier on Pilot Securities in the Test Group
sharing of information—could SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OSTP is Three, (3) amend the Limit Up/Limit
encourage more information sharing, particularly interested in responses Down (‘‘LULD’’ price controls set forth
including when it might be inadvisable related to the following topics: (1) The in Exchange Rule 80C—Equities
from a privacy perspective or when a potential benefits and drawbacks of regarding the Regulation NMS Plan to
criminal successfully breaks into an Address Extraordinary Market Volatility
increased data portability; (2) the
unsecured service. (‘‘LULD Plan’’),6 and (4) amend the
industries or types of data that would
The Office of Science and Technology Exchange’s Trading Collars calculation
most benefit or be harmed by increased in Exchange Rule 1000-Equities. The
Policy (OSTP) is interested in data portability; (3) the specific steps
understanding the benefits and proposed rule change was published for
the Federal Government, private comment in the Federal Register on
drawbacks of increased data portability companies, associations, or others might
as well as potential policy avenues to September 15, 2016.7 The Commission
take to encourage or require greater data received two comment letters on the
achieve greater data portability. The portability (and the important benefits
views of the American people, proposal.8 On September 27, 2016, the
or drawbacks of each approach); (4) best
including stakeholders such as
practices in implementing data 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
consumers, academic and industry
portability; and (5) any additional 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
researchers, and private companies, are 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74892
important to inform an understanding of information related to data portability
(May 6, 2015), 80 FR 27513 (May 13, 2015)
these questions. policy making, not requested above, that (‘‘Approval Order’’). Unless otherwise specified,
you believe OSTP should consider with capitalized terms used in this order are defined as
DATES: Responses must be received by
respect to data portability. set forth in the Plan.
November 23, 2016 to be considered. 4 17 CFR 242.608.
ADDRESSES: You may submit responses Ted Wackler, 5 Exchange Rule 67(e)(4)(A)—Equities defines the
by any of the following methods (online Deputy Chief of Staff and Assistant Director. ‘‘Trade-at Prohibition’’ to mean the prohibition
against executions by a Trading Center of a sell
is preferred): [FR Doc. 2016–24246 Filed 10–6–16; 8:45 am] order for a Pilot Security at the price of a Protected
• Online: You may submit via the BILLING CODE 3270–F6–P Bid or the execution of a buy order for a Pilot
web form at: https:// Security at the price of a Protected Offer during
www.whitehouse.gov/webform/request- regular trading hours. See also Plan Section I(LL)
and Plan Section VI(D).
information-regarding-data-portability. 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67091
• Email: USCTO@ostp.eop.gov.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
(May 31, 2012), 77 FR 33498 (June 6, 2012) (File
Include [Data Portability] in the subject No. 4–631).
line of the message. 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78803
• Mail: Data Portability RFI, c/o (September 9, 2016), 81 FR 63552.
8 See Letters from Eric Swanson, EVP, General
Alexander Macgillivray, Eisenhower
Counsel, Bats Global Markets, Inc., Elizabeth K.
Executive Office Building (Office 437), King, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary,
1650 Pennsylvania Ave NW., New York Stock Exchange; and Thomas A.
Washington, DC 20502. If submitting a Wittman, EVP, Global Head of Equities, Nasdaq,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:36 Oct 06, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM 07OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_70069/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 195 / Friday, October 7, 2016 / Notices 69877
Three, how resting non-displayed orders V. Solicitation of Comments on modified by Amendment No. 2, prior to
would trade, how order with a STPN Amendment No. 2 the thirtieth day after the date of
Modifier would be handled, and that g- Interested persons are invited to publication of notice of Amendment No.
Quotes and Buy Minus/Zero Plus orders submit written data, views, and 2 in the Federal Register. As described
will be rejected. The Exchange also arguments concerning the foregoing, above, the Exchange proposes to amend
proposes to only permit buy and sell including whether Amendment No. 2 is its rules to comply with the Plan and
orders that are entered into the Cross consistent with the Exchange Act. clarify other rules related to LULD and
Function pursuant to Supplementary Comments may be submitted by any of Trading Collars.
Material .10 to Rule 76 to be eligible for the following methods: The Commission believes that the
the Block Size order exception to the proposals related to LULD Price Bands
Trade-at Prohibition.38 Electronic Comments and Trading Collars should provide
In addition, the Exchange proposes to • Use the Commission’s Internet clarity on instances where they are not
amend provisions related to two comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ in the MPV. The Commission believes
exceptions to the Trade-at Prohibition. rules/sro.shtml); or that the proposals related to the Pilot are
• Send an email to rule-comments@ designed to ensure compliance with the
First, the Exchange proposes amend the
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– Plan. The Commission notes that the
TAISO definition to reflect that ISOs
NYSEMKT–2016–83 on the subject line. Pilot is scheduled to start on October 3,
may be routed to the full displayed size
of a Protected Quotation that is traded- Paper Comments 2016, and accelerated approval would
at and to make the corresponding ensure that the rules of the Exchange
• Send paper comments in triplicate would be in place for the start of the
change to the specific trade-at to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
exception. Second, the Exchange Pilot. Accordingly, the Commission
Commission, 100 F Street NE., finds good cause, pursuant to Section
proposes to amend the exception for Washington, DC 20549–1090.
Block Size orders to allow an order of 19(b)(2) of the Act,41 to approve the
All submissions should refer to File proposed rule change, as modified by
Block Size to be executed on multiple Number SR–NYSEMKT–2016–83. This
Trading Centers. Amendment No. 2, on an accelerated
file number should be included on the basis.
The Commission believes that these subject line if email is used. To help the
changes are reasonably designed to Commission process and review your VII. Conclusion
comply with the Plan. Further, the comments more efficiently, please use It is therefore ordered that, pursuant
Commission believes that the proposed only one method. The Commission will to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,42 the
changes that are targeted at particular post all comments on the Commission’s proposed rule change (SR–NYSEMKT–
Test Groups are necessary for Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ 2016–83), as modified by Amendment
compliance with the Plan. Accordingly, rules/sro.shtml). No. 2, be and hereby is approved on an
the Commission finds that these Copies of the submission, all accelerated basis.
changes are consistent with Section subsequent amendments, all written
For the Commission, by the Division of
6(b)(5) of the Act 39 and Rule 608 of statements with respect to the proposed
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
Regulation NMS 40 because they rule change that are filed with the authority.43
implement the Plan and clarify Commission, and all written
Robert W. Errett,
Exchange Rules. communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the Deputy Secretary.
In addition, the Exchange proposes to [FR Doc. 2016–24283 Filed 10–6–16; 8:45 am]
Commission and any person, other than
adopt a rule to specify how the
those that may be withheld from the BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Exchange will calculate LULD Price
public in accordance with the
Bands after the Exchange opens or
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
reopens. The Commission believes that SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
available for Web site viewing and
this change should help to ensure that COMMISSION
printing in the Commission’s Public
trading does not occur outside of Price
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Bands when LULD is in effect. Washington, DC 20549–1090, on official
[Release No. 34–79023; File No. SR–Phlx–
2016–82]
Finally, the Exchange proposes to business days between the hours of
specify that Trading Collars that are not 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such Self-Regulatory Organizations;
in the MPV would be rounded down to filing will also be available for NASDAQ PHLX LLC; Notice of
the nearest price. The Commission inspection and copying at the principal Designation of Longer Period for
believes that this change should provide office of the Exchange. All comments Commission Action on a Proposed
clarity in the Exchange’s rules. received will be posted without change; Rule Change To Adopt a New
For these reasons, the Commission the Commission does not edit personal Exception in Exchange Rule 1000(f) for
finds that the proposed rule change, as identifying information from Sub-MPV Split-Priced Orders
modified by Amendment No. 2, is submissions. You should submit only
consistent with the requirements of the information that you wish to make October 3, 2016.
Act and Rule 608 of Regulation NMS. available publicly. All submissions On August 3, 2016, NASDAQ PHLX
should refer to File Number SR– LLC (the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
38 The Commission notes that the orders entered NYSEMKT–2016–83 and should be Securities and Exchange Commission
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
into the Cross Function for purposes of relying on submitted on or before October 28, (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
the Block Size exception must satisfy the provisions 2016. 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of the exception, including that it may not be an of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
aggregation of non-block orders, or broken into VI. Accelerated Approval of Proposed
orders smaller than Block Size prior to submitting Rule Change, as Modified by 41 15
the order the Trading Center for execution. See U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
Amendment No. 2
Exchange Rule 67(e)(4)(C)(iii). 42 Id.
39 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). The Commission finds good cause to 43 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
40 17 CFR 242.608. approve the proposed rule change, as 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:36 Oct 06, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM 07OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_70069/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-13 16:31:53
Document Modified: 2018-02-13 16:31:53
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 69874 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR