81 FR 70092 - Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments in Part; 2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 196 (October 11, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 196 (October 11, 2016)
| Page Range | 70092-70094 | |
| FR Document | 2016-24488 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 11, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 70092-70094] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-24488] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-890] Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments in Part; 2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: In response to requests from interested parties, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is conducting the eleventh administrative review (``AR'') of the antidumping duty order on wooden bedroom furniture (``WBF'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). The period of review (``POR'') is January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2015. This AR covers 18 companies. The Department has preliminarily determined that seven of the 18 companies, including the sole mandatory respondent, have not established their entitlement to a separate rate and are part of the PRC-wide entity. The Department has also preliminarily determined that the remaining 11 companies had no reviewable transactions during the POR. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective October 11, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick O'Connor, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0989. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background After initiating this review with respect to 141 companies or company groupings,\1\ interested parties withdrew [[Page 70093]] all review requests for 123 of the 141 companies.\2\ On June 8, 2016, the Department issued an antidumping duty questionnaire to the sole mandatory respondent in this review, Nantong Wangzhuang Furniture Co., Ltd. (``Nantong Wangzhuang''). Nantong Wangzhuang did not respond to the questionnaire. For a complete description of the events that followed the initiation of this administrative review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum which is hereby adopted by this notice.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 81 FR 11179 (March 3, 2016) (``Initiation Notice''). \2\ See Wooden Bedroom Furniture, From the People's Republic of China: Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 81 FR 62083 (September 8, 2016). \3\ See ``Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China,'' from Edward Yang, Senior Director, Office VII, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance (``Preliminary Decision Memorandum''), dated concurrently with this notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Scope of the Order The product covered by the order is wooden bedroom furniture, subject to certain exceptions.\4\ Imports of subject merchandise are classified under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS'') subheadings: 9403.50.9042, 9403.50.9045, 9403.50.9041, 9403.60.8081, 9403.20.0018, 9403.90.8041, 7009.92.1000 or 7009.92.5000. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written product description in the Order remains dispositive.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the People's Republic of China, 70 FR 329 (January 4, 2005) (``Order''). \5\ For a complete description of the scope of the Order, please see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'') and 19 CFR 351.213. For a full description of the methodology underlying our preliminary results of review, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. A list of topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is provided in Appendix I to this notice. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments Because U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') did not provide any information contradicting the claims of the 11 companies under review which claimed to have made no shipments, the Department preliminarily determines that these 11 companies did not have any reviewable transactions during the POR.\6\ For additional information regarding this determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\7\ Consistent with the Department's practice in non-market economy (``NME'') cases, the Department is not rescinding this AR, in part, with respect to these 11 companies, but intends to complete the review with respect to the companies for which it has preliminarily found no shipments and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of the review.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ The 11 companies/company groupings are: (1) Dongguan Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd., Taicang Sunrise Wood Industry Co., Ltd., Taicang Fairmount Designs Furniture Co., Ltd., Meizhou Sunrise Furniture Co., Ltd.; (2) Eurosa (Kunshan) Co., Ltd., Eurosa Furniture Co., (Pte) Ltd.; (3) Golden Well International (HK) Ltd.; (4) Jiangsu Tairui Structure Engineering Co., Ltd.; (5) Nanhai Jiantai Woodwork Co., Ltd., Fortune Glory Industrial Ltd. (H.K. Ltd.); (6) Rizhao Sanmu Woodworking Co., Ltd.; (7) Shenyang Shining Dongxing Furniture Co., Ltd.; (8) Wanvog Furniture (Kunshan) Co., Ltd.; (9) Woodworth Wooden Industries (Dong Guan) Co., Ltd.; (10) Yeh Brothers World Trade Inc.; and (11) Zhejiang Tianyi Scientific & Educational Equipment Co., Ltd. \7\ See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. \8\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694, 65694-95 (October 24, 2011) and the ``Assessment Rates'' section, below. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Review As noted above, Nantong Wangzhuang did not respond to the Department's antidumping duty questionnaire. Therefore, the Department preliminarily determines that Nantong Wangzhuang did not establish its eligibility for separate rate status. In addition, six other companies for which a review was requested failed to provide separate rate applications or certifications.\9\ Therefore, the Department preliminarily determines that these seven companies are part of the PRC-wide entity. The PRC-wide entity rate is 216.01 percent. For additional information regarding this determination, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ The six companies are: (1) Dongguan Singways Furniture Co., Ltd.; (2) Clearwise Co., Ltd.; (3) Pleasant Wave Ltd., Passwell Corp.; (4) Shanghai JianPu Export & Import Co., Ltd.; (5) Decca Furniture Ltd.; and (6) Hangzhou Cadman Trading Co., Ltd. (Exporter), Haining Changbei Furniture Co., Ltd. (Producer). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public Comment Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results and may submit case briefs and/or written comments, filed electronically using ACCESS, within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, will be due five days after the due date for case briefs, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(d). Parties who submit case or rebuttal briefs in this review are requested to submit with each argument a statement of the issue, a summary of the argument not to exceed five pages, and a table of statutes, regulations, and cases cited, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2). Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of this notice.\10\ Hearing requests should contain the following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral presentations at the hearing will be limited to issues raised in the case briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). \11\ See 19 CFR 351.310(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unless extended, the Department intends to issue the final results of this AR, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in any briefs received, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuing the final results of this review, the Department will determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\12\ The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. We intend to instruct CBP to liquidate [[Page 70094]] entries of subject merchandise exported by the PRC-wide entity, including Nantong Wangzhuang and the other six companies noted above which did not qualify for separate rate status, at the PRC-wide rate. Additionally, pursuant to the Department's practice in NME cases, if we continue to determine that the 11 companies noted above had no shipments of subject merchandise, any suspended entries of subject merchandise during the POR under their case numbers will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b). \13\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (2) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate for the PRC-wide entity, which is 216.01 percent; and (3) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. We are issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213. Dated: October 3, 2016. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix I List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum (1) Summary (2) Background (3) Scope of the Order (4) Respondent Selection (5) Discussion of the Methodology a. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments b. Duty Absorption c. NME Country Status d. Separate Rates (6) Conclusion [FR Doc. 2016-24488 Filed 10-7-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![70092 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2016 / Notices
Preliminary Decision Memorandum can Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme
be accessed directly at http:// DC 20230, at a time and location to be (EPCGS)
enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed determined. Parties should confirm by Programs Requiring Additional
Information
Preliminary Decision Memorandum and telephone the date, time, and location of Duty Drawback and Annex 45
the electronic version of the Preliminary the hearing two days before the Program Preliminarily Determined To Be Not
Decision Memorandum are identical in scheduled date. Countervailable
content. A list of topics discussed in the Unless the deadline is extended Central Value Added Tax (CENVAT)
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Reimbursements
included as Appendix I to this notice. Act, the Department will issue the final Programs Preliminarily Determined To Be
results of this administrative review, Not Used During the POR
Preliminary Results of Review Recommendation
including the results of its analysis of
The Department preliminarily issues raised in any written briefs, [FR Doc. 2016–24486 Filed 10–7–16; 8:45 am]
determines that the following net within 120 days after the date of BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
subsidy rate exists for the period publication of these preliminary results.
January 1, 2014, through December 31,
2014: Assessment Rates DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Upon issuance of the final results, the
Manufacturer/exporter Net subsidy rate International Trade Administration
Department shall determine, and U.S.
Goldenpalm Manufactur- 0.92 percent ad Customs and Border Protection (CBP) [A–570–890]
ers PVT Ltd. valorem. shall assess, countervailing duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the
review. We intend to issue instructions People’s Republic of China:
Disclosure and Public Comment Preliminary Results of Antidumping
to CBP 15 days after publication of the
The Department will disclose to Duty Administrative Review and
final results of review.
parties to this proceeding the Preliminary Determination of No
calculations performed in connection Cash Deposit Instructions Shipments in Part; 2015
with these preliminary results within
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
five days of the date of publication of
Act, the Department also intends to International Trade Administration,
this notice.3 Pursuant to 19 CFR
instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of Department of Commerce.
351.309(c)(1)(ii), the Department will
estimated countervailing duties, in the
notify interested parties of the due date SUMMARY: In response to requests from
amount shown above, for the company
to submit case briefs.4 Rebuttal briefs interested parties, the Department of
shown above, on shipments of subject
may be filed no later than five days after Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) is
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
the deadline for filing case briefs, and conducting the eleventh administrative
from warehouse, for consumption on or
must be limited to issues raised in the review (‘‘AR’’) of the antidumping duty
after the date of publication of the final order on wooden bedroom furniture
case briefs.5 Parties who submit case or
rebuttal briefs are requested to submit results of this review. For all non- (‘‘WBF’’) from the People’s Republic of
with the argument: (1) A statement of reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to China (‘‘PRC’’). The period of review
the issue; (2) a brief summary of the collect cash deposits of estimated (‘‘POR’’) is January 1, 2015, through
argument; and (3) a table of authorities.6 countervailing duties at the most recent December 31, 2015. This AR covers 18
Case and rebuttal briefs should be filed company-specific or all-others rate companies. The Department has
electronically using ACCESS.7 applicable to the company, as preliminarily determined that seven of
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), appropriate. These cash deposit the 18 companies, including the sole
interested parties who wish to request a requirements, when imposed, shall mandatory respondent, have not
hearing must do so within 30 days of remain in effect until further notice. established their entitlement to a
publication of these preliminary results Notification to Interested Parties separate rate and are part of the PRC-
by submitting a written request to the wide entity. The Department has also
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and These preliminary results of review preliminarily determined that the
Compliance, U.S. Department of are issued and published in accordance remaining 11 companies had no
Commerce, filed electronically using with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of reviewable transactions during the POR.
ACCESS. Requests should contain the the Act and 19 CFR 351.213 and We invite interested parties to comment
party’s name, address, and telephone 351.221(b)(4). on these preliminary results.
number; the number of participants; and Dated: October 4, 2016. DATES: Effective October 11, 2016.
a list of the issues to be discussed. If a Ronald K. Lorentzen, FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
request for a hearing is made, we will Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement Patrick O’Connor, AD/CVD Operations,
inform parties of the scheduled date for and Compliance. Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance,
the hearing which will be held at the
Appendix I—List of Topics in the International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Preliminary Decision Memorandum Department of Commerce, 1401
3 See
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
19 CFR 351.224(b). Summary
4 Because the Department requires additional
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0989.
Background
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
time to examine Goldenpalm’s use of duty Scope of the Order SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
drawback programs during the POR, which will Subsidies Valuation
require post-preliminary results analysis, we will Background
announce to parties at a later date the case brief Allocation Period
deadlines. See the Preliminary Decision Cross-Ownership After initiating this review with
Memorandum at 9 for a discussion of the programs Denominator respect to 141 companies or company
that require further analysis. Benchmark Interest Rates groupings,1 interested parties withdrew
5 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). Analysis of Programs
6 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). Program Preliminarily Determined To Be 1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
7 See 19 CFR 351.303. Countervailable Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:12 Oct 07, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM 11OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_70288/page/1.svg)
![70094 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 196 / Tuesday, October 11, 2016 / Notices
entries of subject merchandise exported Dated: October 3, 2016. Electricity and Water Authority (DEWA)
by the PRC-wide entity, including Ronald K. Lorentzen, and Sharjah Electricity and Water
Nantong Wangzhuang and the other six Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement Authority, and by a federal authority
companies noted above which did not and Compliance. that operates in the smaller northern
qualify for separate rate status, at the emirates (FEWA).
Appendix I In Abu Dhabi, ADWEA has
PRC-wide rate. Additionally, pursuant
to the Department’s practice in NME List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary established a long-term program for the
Decision Memorandum privatization of the electricity sector and
cases, if we continue to determine that
the 11 companies noted above had no (1) Summary a number of independent water and
(2) Background power producers have been established
shipments of subject merchandise, any
(3) Scope of the Order as joint-venture arrangements between
suspended entries of subject (4) Respondent Selection
merchandise during the POR under ADWEA and various international
(5) Discussion of the Methodology
their case numbers will be liquidated at power companies as Build—Operate—
a. Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments Own projects. The Dubai government is
the PRC-wide rate.13
b. Duty Absorption also promoting private investment in its
Cash Deposit Requirements c. NME Country Status electricity generation sector, and
d. Separate Rates recently passed legislation allowing the
The following cash deposit (6) Conclusion private sector to participate in
requirements will be effective upon [FR Doc. 2016–24488 Filed 10–7–16; 8:45 am] electricity generation by establishing
publication of the final results of this BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P project companies and by collaborating
review for shipments of the subject with third parties.
merchandise from the PRC entered, or Per the UAE Ministry of Energy, the
withdrawn from warehouse, for DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE total generated electricity in 2014 was
consumption on or after the publication 116, 528 GWH and consumption was
date, as provided by sections International Trade Administration about 111.685 GWH. Rapid economic
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For and demographic growth over the past
previously investigated or reviewed PRC Executive-Led Power Technologies decade is pushing the UAE’s electricity
and non-PRC exporters that received a Trade Mission to the United Arab grid close to its limits. The UAE
Emirates and Saudi Arabia, March 12– currently relies primarily on natural gas,
separate rate in a prior segment of this
16, 2017 but it is also adding nuclear, renewable,
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the existing exporter- AGENCY: International Trade and coal-fired electricity generating
specific rate; (2) for all PRC exporters of Administration, Department of capacity. To support its economic
subject merchandise that have not been Commerce. diversification and sustainable
found to be entitled to a separate rate, ACTION: Notice.
development, the UAE plans to meet a
the cash deposit rate will be the rate for significant portion of its energy needs
the PRC-wide entity, which is 216.01 SUMMARY: The United States Department using renewable sources. According to
percent; and (3) for all non-PRC of Commerce (DOC), International Trade statements made by Energy Minister
exporters of subject merchandise which Administration (ITA), is organizing an Suhail Al Mazrouei in January 2016, the
have not received their own rate, the executive-led Power Technologies Trade UAE plans to increase its target for
cash deposit rate will be the rate Mission to the United Arab Emirates power generation from clean energy to
applicable to the PRC exporter that (UAE) and Saudi Arabia (KSA) on 30 percent by 2030, with at least 25
March 12–16, 2017. The purpose of the percent of the country’s electricity
supplied that non-PRC exporter.
trade mission is to introduce U.S. firms generated from both nuclear and solar.
These deposit requirements, when to KSA and UAE’s expanding power Below is information on various sub-
imposed, shall remain in effect until technology sector, which seeks to sectors of the power sector in the UAE.
further notice. procure power equipment, distribution, D Solar: In 2013, DEWA launched the
power grid, as well as spare parts, and Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum
Notification to Importers
equipment with a focus on the Solar Park in Dubai, which was
This notice also serves as a renewable sector, and also to assist originally slated to generate 1,000MW of
preliminary reminder to importers of those U.S. firms in pursuing export solar energy; however, in January 2016,
their responsibility under 19 CFR opportunities in this sector, by helping DEWA announced that it would triple
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate new-to-market companies learn about the project’s size to 3,000MW, and then
regarding the reimbursement of the KSA and UAE energy markets and in February, the Dubai directives
antidumping duties prior to liquidation make initial contacts, and by supporting expanded the plant to 5,000MW by 2030
of the relevant entries during this U.S. companies already doing business (the expected completion date). Also in
review period. Failure to comply with in the KSA and UAE to widen and 2013, Abu Dhabi’s Masdar Clean Energy
this requirement could result in the deepen their business interests. commissioned the 100-megawatt, grid
Department’s presumption that connected concentrated solar power
UAE Commercial Setting plant Shams One, a joint venture with
reimbursement of antidumping duties
The UAE is a federation of the seven Abengoa Solar and Total. Masdar also
occurred and the subsequent assessment
emirates of Abu Dhabi, Ajman, Dubai, developed the 10MW solar PV plant at
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
of double antidumping duties. We are
Fujairah, Ras Al-Khaimah, Sharjah and Masdar City and is developing a 30MW
issuing and publishing these results in
Umm Al-Quwain. The generation, wind farm and a PV array on Sir
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
transmission and distribution of BaniYas Island.
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213.
electricity in the UAE is dominated by D Smart Grid and Smart Metering: In
13 For a full discussion of this practice, see Non-
three water and power authorities 2014, ADWEA achieved a milestone
Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings:
owned by each of the individual when it successfully deployed a Battery
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 emirates: Abu Dhabi Water and Energy Storage System which is
(October 24, 2011). Electricity Authority (ADWEA), Dubai connected to the Abu Dhabi electricity
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:12 Oct 07, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM 11OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_70288/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-13 16:34:00
Document Modified: 2018-02-13 16:34:00
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective October 11, 2016. | |
| Contact | Patrick O'Connor, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0989. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 70092 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR