81 FR 7041 - Revising the Ticket to Work Program Rules
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 27 (February 10, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 27 (February 10, 2016)
| Page Range | 7041-7044 | |
| FR Document | 2016-02657 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 10, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 7041-7044] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-02657] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION [Docket No. SSA-2015-0025] 20 CFR Part 411 RIN 0960-AH50 Revising the Ticket to Work Program Rules AGENCY: Social Security Administration. ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM). ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We are soliciting public input on whether and how we might revise the current Ticket to Work program rules. The Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999 established the Ticket to Work program to allow individuals with disabilities to seek services to obtain and retain employment in order to reduce dependency on cash benefit programs. In creating the program, Congress found that eliminating barriers to work and providing individuals with real choice in obtaining services and technology to find, enter, and maintain employment can greatly improve the short and long-term financial independence and personal well-being of our beneficiaries. We want to explore improving our Ticket to Work program as part of our ongoing effort to help our beneficiaries find and maintain employment that leads to increased independence and enhanced productivity. If we propose [[Page 7042]] specific revisions to our regulations, we will publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal Register. DATES: To ensure that we consider your comments, we must receive them by no later than April 11, 2016. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by Internet, fax, or mail. Do not submit the same comments multiple times or by more than one method. Regardless of which method you choose, please state that your comments refer to Docket No. SSA-2015-0025 so that we may associate your comments with this ANPRM. Caution: You should be careful to include in your comments only information you wish to make publicly available. We strongly urge you not to include in your comments any personal information, such as Social Security numbers or medical information. 1. Internet: We strongly recommend this method for submitting your comments. Visit the Federal eRulemaking portal at http://www.regulations.gov. Use the Web page's Search function to find docket number SSA-2015-0025. Once you submit your comment, the system will issue you a tracking number to confirm your submission. You will not be able to view your comment immediately because we post each comment manually. It may take up to a week for your comment to appear. 2. Fax: Fax comments to (410) 966-2830. 3. Mail: Address your comments to the Office of Regulations and Reports Clearance, Social Security Administration, 3100 West High Rise Building, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, Maryland 21235-6401. Comments are available for public viewing on the Federal eRulemaking portal at http://www.regulations.gov or in person, during regular business hours, by arranging with the contact person identified below. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Green, Deputy Director, Office of Beneficiary Outreach and Employment Support, Office of Research, Demonstration and Employment Support, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-6401, (410) 965-9852. For information on eligibility or filing for benefits, call our national toll-free number, 1-800-772-1213 or TTY 1-800-325-0778, or visit our Internet site, Social Security Online, at http://www.socialsecurity.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: What is the purpose of this ANPRM? The purpose of this ANPRM is to solicit ideas for improving the Ticket to Work program. We are considering whether and how we might update the Ticket to Work program rules to help both our beneficiaries and the providers that serve our beneficiaries in the program. The Ticket to Work program rules are contained in 20 CFR part 411. We last updated the program rules on May 20, 2008. Through this ANPRM, we are requesting comments and suggestions from the public on what we might include in new Ticket to Work program rules. Why are we considering new Ticket to Work program rules? According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' (BLS) Current Population Survey (http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t06.htm), the July 2015 unemployment rate for individuals with a disability \1\ was 10.4 percent, compared to 5.4 percent for people without disability. This number refers to those who were actively seeking a job, and were willing, able and available to work, but unable to find a job in the month prior to the survey. The July 2015 employment-population ratio, which measures the percent of people in a given population who are working, was 17.7 percent for persons with a disability, versus 65.3 percent for those without a disability. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The BLS uses a different definition of ``disability'' than we do. The BLS defines a person with disability as someone with at least one of the following conditions: Is deaf or has serious difficulty hearing; is blind or has serious difficulty seeing even when wearing glasses; has serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition; has serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs; has difficulty dressing or bathing; or has difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor's office or shopping because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition. Sections 223(d)(1)(A) and 1614(a)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 423(d)(1)(A), 1382c(a)(3)(A), define ``disability'' as the inability to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment. The impairment must be one that can be expected to result in death or that has lasted or can be expected to last for a continuous 12-month period. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Employment programs that assist people with finding jobs may focus on either short-term or long-term goals. For example, the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model emphasizes rapid job search and placement. Other models focus on equipping people with the education, skills, and supports that are building blocks of sustainable success in the labor market. We seek comments on the effectiveness of different employment support models and on how we can change the structure of the Ticket to Work program to incorporate the most successful models. Since the last change in the Ticket to Work rules, there has been increased research in the fields of financial literacy, behavioral economics, and psychology. This could inform us on how to improve Ticket to Work program outcomes. For example, research shows that the way information is presented influences the decisions an individual makes. Therefore, it is essential to present information clearly and effectively, particularly for decisions that are complex or have long- term consequences. Beneficiaries in the Ticket to Work program face complex decisions regarding employment and benefits options. We are seeking your suggestions on effective ways to present information to beneficiaries to improve participation and outcomes in the Ticket to Work program. Further, beneficiaries may need other supports to manage their finances and benefits. In our preliminary research, we noticed three areas of possible interest to beneficiaries in the program: (1) Financial education and counseling, (2) access to financial services and products, and (3) asset building. We request comments on how the Ticket to Work program might assist beneficiaries in understanding the options for increasing their earnings and achieving/sustaining greater financial independence, and whether financial education, financial services, and asset building are necessary to foster work outcomes that are likely to lead to exit from the disability rolls. We also welcome your ideas on fostering program success for and with employment networks (ENs), which are the approved service providers for the program. Beneficiaries may obtain assistance from ENs in locating, retaining, and advancing in jobs/careers. We want your input on how we can remove service barriers for and increase the effectiveness of ENs, and which services the ENs might provide to help beneficiaries to secure employment and increase their earnings. In particular, we welcome comments and actual examples of how ENs can best assist individuals--in concert with employers, VR agencies, public work force systems, WIPAs and other entities--to achieve and sustain our beneficiaries' employment success. Under the current program rules, the amount of our payments to ENs remains the same as long as a beneficiary meets our earnings requirements. We do not increase EN payments when a beneficiary earns more than the substantial gainful activity (SGA) level for sustained periods. (SGA describes a [[Page 7043]] level of work activity and earnings, which we use as one factor to determine disability. We ordinarily consider an individual earning more than a certain monthly amount, excluding impairment-related work expenses, as engaging in SGA.) For 2015, earnings of more than $1,090 per month for non-blind individuals or $1,820 per month for blind individuals indicate SGA. We invite your comments on whether we should structure the payment system to provide ENs with increased payments for helping beneficiaries locate and keep higher paying jobs. In general, with regard to removing service barriers for the ENs or changing the payment structure, we seek comments on how to foster a robust market of employment support services for our beneficiaries. We are committed to identifying strategies that help people find and maintain employment and improve their economic status. Any changes we make to the Ticket to Work program should be based on strong research and effective practices that are evidence-based and data- driven. By adapting these practices to the Ticket to Work program, we hope to improve the long-term employment and economic prospects of our beneficiaries. If we propose specific revisions, we will publish a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register. On which rules are we inviting comments and suggestions? We are interested in any comments and suggestions you have on whether and how we should revise our Ticket to Work rules found in 20 CFR part 411. You can find the current rules for the Ticket to Work and Self-Sufficiency Program on the Internet at: http://www.thefederalregister.org/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2009-title20-vol2/pdf/CFR-2009-title20-vol2-part411.pdf. We issued initial Ticket to Work program rules on December 28, 2001 (66 FR 67370). Based on our experience administering the program, we published amendments to those rules on May 20, 2008 (73 FR 29324). The revised rules simplified the program and made it more attractive to beneficiaries and potential service providers. In our ongoing effort to improve employment outcomes for beneficiaries, we are inviting your comments on whether and how we should revise the rules again. We would like your comments on the program rules and your thoughts on our specific questions below. If you know of research studies supporting your recommendations, please attach the study to your comments or provide the name of the study, date of publication, and name(s) of the researcher(s) in your response. Who should send us comments and suggestions? We invite comments and suggestions from the following individuals and groups: Current and former beneficiaries, State Agencies (particularly State Vocational Agencies and Job Development Programs), advocates, current and former employment networks, and interested members of the public. What should you comment about? We are interested in any comments and suggestions on ways to improve the Ticket to Work program. For example: 1. Overall, how can we support the employment goals of social security beneficiaries through the Ticket to Work program? 2. How could we structure and present information to increase participation in and effectiveness of the program? 3. What employment support models are likely to be most effective in achieving the intent and goals of the program? 4. What incentives could we offer to help ensure ENs are financially and organizationally viable? 5. What incentives could we offer ENs for collaborating effectively with employers, VR agencies, public work force systems, WIPAs and other entities assisting our disability beneficiaries? 6. How could the program encourage youth with disabilities to pursue apprenticeships, career development programs, post-secondary education, and other work-related opportunities in a manner similar to their peers without disabilities? 7. How could ENs become integral to transition planning with youth who have disabilities, their families, and local schools? 8. Would offering beneficiaries financial education and planning services be appropriate for the program? If so, how could we accomplish this through changes to the program regulations? 9. What service barriers or administrative complexities do ENs face that inhibit their ability to serve our beneficiaries? 10. How might we encourage more organizations that can provide appropriate services to our beneficiaries to participate as ENs? 11. Should we adjust our payment systems to increase EN payments when a beneficiary earns more than the SGA level for sustained periods? If so, what adjustments could we make without increasing overall program costs? 12. Should we adjust our payment systems to provide even more EN payments than we currently do for helping a beneficiary secure and maintain part-time employment below the SGA level? If so, how might such a payment differ from the EN payments for a beneficiary earning at or above the SGA level? 13. The blanket purchase agreement we award to contractors to serve as ENs outlines their requirements to provide ongoing support services to beneficiaries. How should we define ``ongoing support services'' for the ENs? What ongoing services are necessary to support beneficiaries in jobs above SGA levels for sustained periods? 14. Under the program, State VR agencies participate either as ENs or under the cost reimbursement payment system (20 CFR 411.355) applicable to them. Should State VR agencies participating as ENs offer the same services and have the same responsibilities as other ENs? If not, what services and supports should State VR agencies participating as ENs provide? 15. In measuring EN performance, we consider factors such as:Completing employment support services as planned; the percentage of Ticket to Work clients who were placed in a job within 9-12 months; the percentage of clients who retained their jobs for significant periods; and the percentage of clients who progressed to long-term earnings above SGA. Are these appropriate measures and, if not, what measures should we use? 16. What are some barriers that ENs face? How might we adjust our rules to help ENs succeed at providing the services and support beneficiaries need to find and maintain employment? Will we respond to your comments from this notice? We will consider all comments and suggestions we receive. However, we will not respond directly to the comments you send in response to this ANPRM. What will we consider when we decide whether to propose revisions? When we decide whether to propose revisions to our rules for the program, we will consider: All comments and suggestions we receive in response to this notice, and Our own experience working with the program. [[Page 7044]] If we decide to propose specific revisions, we will publish a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register, and you will have an opportunity to comment on the revisions we propose. List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 411 Administrative practice and procedure, Blind, Disability benefits, Public assistance programs, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Social security, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), Vocational rehabilitation. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security. [FR Doc. 2016-02657 Filed 2-9-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4191-02-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2016 / Proposed Rules 7041
developing reasoned regulatory CFR), Part 71 by establishing Class E Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103,
decisions on the proposal. Comments airspace extending upward from 700 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
are specifically invited on the overall feet above the surface within an 6-mile 1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
regulatory, aeronautical, economic, radius of South Grand Lake Regional § 71.1 [Amended]
environmental, and energy-related Airport, Ketchum, OK, to accommodate
■ 2. The incorporation by reference in
aspects of the proposal. new standard instrument approach
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Z,
Communications should identify both procedures. Controlled airspace is
Airspace Designations and Reporting
docket numbers and be submitted in needed for the safety and management
Points, dated August 6, 2015, and
triplicate to the address listed above. of IFR operations at the airport.
effective September 15, 2015, is
Commenters wishing the FAA to Class E airspace areas are published
amended as follows:
acknowledge receipt of their comments in Section 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9Z,
on this notice must submit with those dated August 6, 2015, and effective Section 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
comments a self-addressed, stamped September 15, 2015, which is Extending Upward From 700 feet or More
postcard on which the following incorporated by reference in 14 CFR Above the Surface of the Earth.
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to 71.1. The Class E airspace designation * * * * *
Docket No. FAA–2016–1288/Airspace listed in this document will be ASW OK E5 Ketchum, OK [New]
Docket No. 15–ASW–23.’’ The postcard published subsequently in the Order.
South Grand Lake Regional Airport, OK
will be date/time stamped and returned (Lat. 36°32′47″ N., long. 095°00′49″ W.)
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
to the commenter.
That airspace extending upward from 700
The FAA has determined that this
Availability of NPRMs feet above the surface within a 6-mile radius
proposed regulation only involves an of South Grand Lake Regional Airport.
An electronic copy of this document established body of technical
may be downloaded through the regulations for which frequent and Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on January 27,
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. routine amendments are necessary to 2016.
Recently published rulemaking keep them operationally current, is non- Robert W. Beck,
documents can also be accessed through controversial and unlikely to result in Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO
the FAA’s Web page at http:// adverse or negative comments. It, Central Service Center.
www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_ therefore: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant [FR Doc. 2016–02549 Filed 2–9–16; 8:45 am]
traffic/publications/airspace_ regulatory action’’ under Executive BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
amendments/. Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
You may review the public docket rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
containing the proposal, any comments and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
received and any final disposition in SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
person in the Dockets Office (see preparation of a regulatory evaluation as [Docket No. SSA–2015–0025]
ADDRESSES section for address and the anticipated impact is so minimal.
phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and Since this is a routine matter that will 20 CFR Part 411
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, only affect air traffic procedures and air RIN 0960–AH50
except Federal holidays. An informal navigation, it is certified that this rule,
docket may also be examined during when promulgated, would not have a Revising the Ticket to Work Program
normal business hours at the Central significant economic impact on a Rules
Service Center, Operation Support substantial number of small entities
Group, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort AGENCY: Social Security Administration.
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Worth, TX 76177. Flexibility Act. ACTION:Advance notice of proposed
Persons interested in being placed on rulemaking (ANPRM).
a mailing list for future NPRMs should Environmental Review
contact the FAA’s Office of Rulemaking SUMMARY: We are soliciting public input
This proposal will be subject to an on whether and how we might revise
(202) 267–9677, to request a copy of environmental analysis in accordance
Advisory Circular No. 11–2A, Notice of the current Ticket to Work program
with FAA Order 1050.1F, rules. The Ticket to Work and Work
Proposed Rulemaking Distribution ‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
System, which describes the application Incentives Improvement Act of 1999
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final established the Ticket to Work program
procedure. regulatory action. to allow individuals with disabilities to
Availability and Summary of List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 seek services to obtain and retain
Documents Proposed for Incorporation employment in order to reduce
by Reference Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
dependency on cash benefit programs.
Navigation (air)
This document would amend FAA In creating the program, Congress found
Order 7400.9Z, Airspace Designations The Proposed Amendment that eliminating barriers to work and
and Reporting Points, dated August 6, In consideration of the foregoing, the providing individuals with real choice
2015, and effective September 15, 2015. Federal Aviation Administration in obtaining services and technology to
find, enter, and maintain employment
asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with PROPOSALS2
FAA Order 7400.9Z is publicly available proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as
as listed in the ADDRESSES section of this follows: can greatly improve the short and long-
document. FAA Order 7400.9Z lists term financial independence and
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, personal well-being of our beneficiaries.
air traffic service routes, and reporting B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR We want to explore improving our
points. TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND Ticket to Work program as part of our
REPORTING POINTS ongoing effort to help our beneficiaries
The Proposal find and maintain employment that
This action proposes to amend Title ■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR leads to increased independence and
14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 part 71 continues to read as follows: enhanced productivity. If we propose
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:36 Feb 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM 10FEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_7068/page/1.svg)
![7044 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2016 / Proposed Rules
If we decide to propose specific rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant IV. Regulatory Analyses
revisions, we will publish a Notice of John Downing, Sector Charleston Office We developed this proposed rule after
Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal of Waterways Management, Coast considering numerous statutes and
Register, and you will have an Guard; telephone (843) 740–3184, email executive orders related to rulemaking.
opportunity to comment on the John.Z.Downing@uscg.mil. Below we summarize our analyses
revisions we propose. based on a number of these statutes and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List of Subjects in 20 CFR Part 411 executive orders.
I. Table of Abbreviations
Administrative practice and A. Regulatory Planning and Review
procedure, Blind, Disability benefits, CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies
Public assistance programs, Reporting
E.O. Executive order to assess the costs and benefits of
and recordkeeping requirements, Social
FR Federal Register available regulatory alternatives and, if
security, Supplemental Security Income
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking regulation is necessary, to select
(SSI), Vocational rehabilitation.
Pub. L. Public Law regulatory approaches that maximize
Carolyn W. Colvin, § Section net benefits. E.O.13563 emphasizes the
Acting Commissioner of Social Security. U.S.C. United States Code importance of quantifying both costs
[FR Doc. 2016–02657 Filed 2–9–16; 8:45 am] COTP Captain of the Port and benefits, of reducing costs, of
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P harmonizing rules, and of promoting
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal flexibility. This NPRM has not been
Basis designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND action,’’ under E.O. 12866. Accordingly,
On December 27, 2015, the Bucksport
SECURITY the NPRM has not been reviewed by the
Marina notified the Coast Guard that it
Office of Management and Budget.
will be sponsoring a series of drag boat
Coast Guard This proposed rule is not a significant
races from 1 p.m. to 7 p.m. on June 4
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
and June 5, 2016. The legal basis for the
33 CFR Part 100 Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
proposed rule is the Coast Guard’s
Planning and Review, as supplemented
[Docket Number USCG–2016–0009] Authority to establish special local
by Executive Order 13563, Improving
regulations: 33 U.S.C. 1233. The
RIN 1625–AA08 Regulation and Regulatory Review, and
purpose of the proposed rule is to does not require an assessment of
Special Local Regulation; Bucksport/ ensure safety of life on the navigable potential costs and benefits under
Lake Murray Drag Boat Spring water of the United States during the section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866
Nationals, Atlantic Intracoastal Bucksport/Lake Murray Drag Boat or under section 1 of Executive Order
Waterway; Bucksport, SC Spring Nationals, a series of high speed 13563. The Office of Management and
boat races. Budget has not reviewed it under those
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule Orders.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The economic impact of this proposed
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to The Coast Guard proposes to establish rule is not significant for the following
establish a special local regulation on a special local regulation on the Atlantic reasons: (1) The special local regulation
the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway in Intracoastal Waterway in Bucksport, would be enforced for only six hours a
Bucksport, South Carolina during the South Carolina during the Bucksport/ day over a two-day period; (2) although
Bucksport/Lake Murray Drag Boat Lake Murray Drag Boat Spring persons and vessels would not be able
Spring Nationals, on June 4 and June 5, Nationals, on June 4 and June 5, 2016. to enter, transit through, anchor in, or
2016. This special local regulation is Approximately 50 powerboats are remain within the regulated area
necessary to ensure the safety of anticipated to participate in the races without authorization from the Captain
participants, spectators, and the general and approximately 35 spectator vessels of the Port Charleston or a designated
public during the event. This proposed are expected to attend the event. representative, they would be able to
rulemaking would prohibit persons and Persons and vessels desiring to enter, operate in the surrounding area during
vessels from being in the regulated area transit through, anchor in, or remain the enforcement periods; (3) persons
unless authorized by the Captain of the within the regulated area may contact and vessels would still be able to enter,
Port Charleston or a designated the Captain of the Port Charleston by transit through, anchor in, or remain
representative. telephone at (843) 740–7050, or a within the regulated area if authorized
designated representative via VHF radio by the Captain of the Port Charleston or
DATES: Comments and related material
on channel 16, to request authorization. a designated representative; and (4) the
must be received by the Coast Guard on If authorization to enter, transit through, Coast Guard would provide advance
or before March 11, 2016. anchor in, or remain within the notification of the regulated area to the
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments regulated area is granted by the Captain local maritime community by Local
identified by docket number USCG– of the Port Charleston or a designated Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice
2016–0009 using the Federal representative, all persons and vessels
asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with PROPOSALS2
to Mariners.
eRulemaking Portal at http:// receiving such authorization must
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public comply with the instructions of the B. Impact on Small Entities
Participation and Request for Captain of the Port Charleston or a The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
Comments’’ portion of the designated representative. The Coast 1980, (5 U.S.C. 601–612), as amended
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for Guard will provide notice of the special requires Federal agencies to consider
further instructions on submitting local regulation by Local Notice to the potential impact of regulations on
comments. Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If and on-scene designated businesses, not-for-profit organizations
you have questions about this proposed representatives. that are independently owned and
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:14 Feb 09, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\10FEP1.SGM 10FEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_7068/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2016-02-10 00:19:43
Document Modified: 2016-02-10 00:19:43
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM). | |
| Dates | To ensure that we consider your comments, we must receive them by no later than April 11, 2016. | |
| Contact | Mark Green, Deputy Director, Office of Beneficiary Outreach and Employment Support, Office of Research, Demonstration and Employment Support, Social Security Administration, 6401 Security Boulevard, Baltimore, MD 21235-6401, (410) 965-9852. For information on eligibility or filing for benefits, call our national toll-free number, 1-800-772-1213 or TTY 1-800-325-0778, or visit our Internet site, Social Security Online, at http:// www.socialsecurity.gov. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 7041 | |
| RIN Number | 0960-AH50 | |
| CFR Associated | Administrative Practice and Procedure; Blind; Disability Benefits; Public Assistance Programs; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Social Security; Supplemental Security Income (ssi) and Vocational Rehabilitation |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR