81 FR 70449 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change Amending Section 146 of the NYSE MKT Company Guide To Adjust the Entitlement to Services of Special Purpose Acquisition Companies
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 197 (October 12, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 197 (October 12, 2016)
| Page Range | 70449-70452 | |
| FR Document | 2016-24608 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 12, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 70449-70452] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-24608] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34-79056; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2016-62] Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rule Change Amending Section 146 of the NYSE MKT Company Guide To Adjust the Entitlement to Services of Special Purpose Acquisition Companies October 6, 2016. I. Introduction On August 2, 2016, NYSE MKT LLC (``NYSE MKT'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities [[Page 70450]] Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend Section 146 of the NYSE MKT Company Guide (``Company Guide'') to adjust the entitlement to services of special purpose acquisition companies. The proposed rule change was published in the Federal Register on August 22, 2016.\3\ The Commission received no comments on the proposal. This order grants approval of the proposed rule change. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78586 (August 16, 2016), 81 FR 56720 (``Notice''). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Description of the Proposal The Exchange proposed to amend Section 146 of the Company Guide to adjust the service entitlements of special purpose acquisition companies (``SPACs'') under that rule. In its filing, the Exchange stated that a SPAC is a special purpose company formed for the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase, reorganization or similar business combination with one or more operating businesses or assets.\4\ The Exchange further stated that to qualify for initial listing, a SPAC must meet one of the quantitative standards in Section 101 or 102 of the Company Guide and must also meet the SPAC-specific requirements of Section 119 of the Company Guide.\5\ Pursuant to Section 119(b) of the Company Guide, within 36 months of the effectiveness of a SPAC's initial public offering registration statement, or such shorter period that the company specifies in its registration statement, the company must complete one or more business combinations having an aggregate fair market value of at least 80% of the value of the deposit account (excluding any deferred underwriter's fees and taxes payable on the income earned on the deposit account) at the time of the agreement to enter into the initial combination (the condition set forth in Section 119(b) is referred to as the ``Business Combination Condition''). Under Section 119 of the Company Guide, among other things, a SPAC must also meet the requirements for initial listing after it meets the Business Combination Condition. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Id. at 56721. \5\ Id. Section 119(a) of the Company Guide requires that at least 90% of the gross proceeds from the SPAC's initial public offering and any concurrent sale by the SPAC of equity securities must be deposited in a trust account maintained by an independent trustee, an escrow account maintained by an ``insured depository institution,'' as that term is defined in Section 3(c)(2) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, or in a separate bank account established by a registered broker or dealer (collectively, a ``deposit account''). For the full set of requirements to list a SPAC, see Section 119 of the Company Guide. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As set forth in Section 146 of the Company Guide, the Exchange offers complimentary products and services for a period of 24 calendar months from the date of initial listing to a category of listed companies defined as ``Eligible New Listings.'' Under the current rule, Eligible New Listings include: (i) Any U.S. company that lists common stock on the Exchange for the first time and any non-U.S. company that lists an equity security on the Exchange under Section 101 or 110 of the Company Guide for the first time, regardless of whether such U.S. or non-U.S. company conducts an offering; (ii) any U.S. or non-U.S. company that transfers its listing of common stock or equity securities, respectively, to the Exchange from another national securities exchange; or (iii) any U.S. or non-U.S. company emerging from a bankruptcy, spinoff (where a company lists new shares in the absence of a public offering), and carve-out (where a company carves out a business line or division, which then conducts a separate initial public offering). Currently, pursuant to Section 146 of the Company Guide, Eligible New Listings are entitled to receive Web-hosting products and services (with a commercial value of approximately $16,000 annually), web- casting services (with a commercial value of approximately $6,500 annually), whistleblower hotline services (with a commercial value of approximately $4,000 annually), news distribution products and services (with a commercial value of approximately $20,000 annually) and corporate governance tools (with a commercial value of approximately $15,000 annually) for a period of 24 calendar months from the date of initial listing on the Exchange. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, if an Eligible New Listing begins to use a particular product or service provided for under Section 146 within 30 days of its initial listing date, the complimentary period begins on the date of first use. The Exchange has now proposed to amend Section 146 of the Company Guide to provide that a SPAC will no longer be deemed to be an Eligible New Listing at the time of its initial listing, and instead will be deemed to be an Eligible New Listing at such time as it has completed the Business Combination Condition, if it remains listed thereafter on the Exchange. Thus, under the proposal, a SPAC will no longer be eligible to receive complimentary products and services under Section 146 at the time of its initial listing, but will instead be entitled to receive such products and services if and when it meets the Business Combination Condition. A SPAC that remains listed on the Exchange after meeting the Business Combination Condition will be entitled to the complimentary products and services under Section 146 for a period of 24 months from the date on which it meets the Business Combination Condition. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, if such a company begins to use a particular product or service provided for under Section 146 within 30 days of meeting the Business Combination Condition, the complimentary period for that product or service will begin on the date of first use. III. Discussion and Commission's Findings The Commission has carefully reviewed the proposed rule change and finds that it is consistent with the requirements of Section 6 of the Act.\6\ Specifically, the Commission believes it is consistent with the provisions of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among Exchange members, issuers, and other persons using the Exchange's facilities, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. Moreover, the Commission believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act \8\ in that it does not impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f. In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5). \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission believes that it is consistent with the Act for the Exchange to adjust the timing of when SPACs are eligible to receive complimentary products and services under Section 146 of the Company Guide from the time of initial listing to the period immediately after meeting the Business Combination Condition. The Exchange represented that SPACs are unlikely to utilize these complimentary products and services at the time of initial listing, but would likely find these products and services useful if they remain listed after they meet the Business Combination Condition.\9\ The Exchange explained that at the time of initial listing, SPACs [[Page 70451]] are typically not focused on their stock price and investor relations to the same degree as operating companies.\10\ The Exchange stated that the complimentary products and services provided under Section 146 are targeted in large part toward the market-driven concerns of newly- listed operating companies, and are therefore less useful to SPACs that have not met the Business Combination Condition.\11\ The Exchange stated that a SPAC that has met the Business Combination Condition, on the other hand, is similarly situated to a newly-formed publicly-traded operating company.\12\ Therefore, the Exchange said that it believes that the complimentary products and services provided under Section 146 will be as relevant and attractive to a SPAC that has met the Business Combination Condition as to the newly-listed operating companies that are generally eligible for those services.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Notice, supra note 3, 81 FR at 56721. \10\ Id. The Exchange stated in its filing that SPACs raise money on a one-time basis and typically trade at a price that is very close to their liquidation value. Id. \11\ Id. \12\ Id. \13\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In addition, the Exchange stated that in many cases SPACs will consider transferring to a new listing venue at the time they meet the Business Combination Condition, and that the proposed rule change will enable the Exchange to compete for the retention of these companies by offering them a package of complimentary products and services that assist their transition to becoming a publicly listed operating company for the first time.\14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ Id. at 56722. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Exchange also stated that it recognizes that not all SPACs will meet the Business Combination Condition and that some listed SPACs will therefore never become eligible for the complimentary products and services under Section 146 that would be provided to an otherwise similarly qualified operating company.\15\ However, the Exchange reiterated that, given the specific characteristics of the SPAC structure, the complimentary products and services provided under Section 146 are generally not of any particular value to a SPAC prior to meeting the Business Combination Condition, and the Exchange therefore believes that those SPACs that never meet the Business Combination Condition and therefore never qualify for the products and services under Section 146 will not suffer any meaningful detriment as a consequence.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \15\ Id. \16\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- As noted in the previous order approving Section 146 of the Company Guide, Section 6(b)(5) of the Act does not require that all issuers be treated the same; rather, the Act requires that the rules of an Exchange not unfairly discriminate between issuers.\17\ In its proposal, the Exchange has made representations that reasonably justify treating a SPAC that decides to continue to list on the Exchange after meeting the Business Combination Condition similar to a newly-listed operating company. In addition, when listed as a SPAC, the SPAC will also be eligible to receive complementary products through the Exchange's Market Access Center similar to all listed companies.\18\ The Commission further notes that a SPAC that completes the Business Combination Condition will be receiving the same package of services as an Eligible New Listing \19\ and that it will not be receiving any additional benefits or services by virtue of the proposed rule change. The Commission has previously found that the package of complimentary products and services offered to Eligible New Listings is equitably allocated among issuers consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act and that describing the values of the products and services will add greater transparency to the Exchange's rules and to the fees applicable to such companies.\20\ The Commission also previously noted that describing in the Company Guide the products and services available to listed companies and their associated values will ensure that individual listed companies are not given specially negotiated packages of products or services to list or remain listed that would raise unfair discrimination issues under the Act.\21\ Based on the foregoing, the Commission believes that the Exchange has provided a sufficient basis for adjusting the timing of when SPACs are eligible to receive the additional complimentary products and services, set forth under Section 146, from the time of a SPAC's initial listing to the period immediately after a SPAC meets the Business Combination Condition, and that this change does not unfairly discriminate among issuers and is therefore consistent with the Act. For similar reasons, and as the value of the services offered are not changing, only the timing of when such services are provided to a SPAC, we find that the proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5); see also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77401 (March 17, 2016), 81 FR 15585 (March 23, 2016) (approving NYSEMKT-2016-12) (``Previous Order''). \18\ See Section 146 of the Company Guide; see also Previous Order, supra note 17, footnotes 11-12 and accompanying text. \19\ See Section 119 of the Company Guide, requiring, among other things, that a SPAC meet the requirements for initial listing after it meets the Business Combination Condition just as is required for other Eligible New Listings. \20\ See Previous Order, supra note 17, at 15586. \21\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission also believes that it is consistent with the Act for the Exchange to allow the complimentary period for a particular service to begin on the date of first use if a SPAC that has met the Business Combination Condition begins to use the service within 30 days after the date of meeting the Business Combination Condition. The Exchange stated in its filing that, in its experience, it will often take companies a period of time to review and complete necessary contracts and training for the complimentary products and services under Section 146 following their becoming eligible for those services and that allowing this modest 30 day period, if the company needs it, will help to ensure that the company will have the benefit of the full period permitted under the rule to actually use the services, thereby enabling companies to receive the full intended benefit.\22\ The Commission notes that Section 146 currently allows an Eligible New Listing to begin using services within 30 days of its initial listing date.\23\ As noted in the Previous Order, the Commission believes that this would provide only a short window of additional time to allow companies to finalize their contracts for the complimentary products and services. The Commission notes that under the proposed rule this additional 30 day window would only be available to SPACs that have determined to remain listed on the Exchange after meeting the Business Combination Condition and thereby treats such SPACs, at the time they qualify for listing as an operating company, the same as other newly-listed companies that qualify as Eligible New Listings under Section 146.\24\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \22\ See Notice, supra note 3, 81 FR at 56722. \23\ See Previous Order, supra note 17. \24\ The Commission expects the Exchange to track the start (and end) date of each free service. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Commission believes that the Exchange is responding to competitive pressures in the market for listings in making this proposal. Specifically, the Exchange has represented that in many cases, SPACs will consider transferring to a new listing venue at the time they meet the Business Combination Condition, and that the proposed rule [[Page 70452]] change would enable it to compete for the retention of these companies by offering them a package of complimentary products and services that assist their transition to being a publicly listed operating company for the first time.\25\ Further, the Commission notes that other exchanges have recently filed similar rule changes with respect to the timing of complementary services offered to SPACs under their rules.\26\ The Commission also notes that nothing in the Exchange's rules requires a SPAC to remain listed on the Exchange after it meets the Business Combination Condition and that such company is free to list on other markets. Accordingly, the Commission believes that the proposed rule reflects the current competitive environment for exchange listings among national securities exchanges, and is appropriate and consistent with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act.\27\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \25\ See Notice, supra note 3, 81 FR at 56722. \26\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78782 (September 7, 2016), 81 FR 62937 (September 13, 2016) (SR-NYSE-2016-58) and Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79025 (October 3, 2016) (SR- NASDAQ-2016-106). \27\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- V. Conclusion It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\28\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEMKT-2016-62) be, and it hereby is, approved. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \28\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). \29\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12). For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.\29\ Brent J. Fields, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2016-24608 Filed 10-11-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 12, 2016 / Notices 70449
including whether the proposed rule SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 5 provides
change is consistent with the Act. COMMISSION that, within 45 days of the publication
Comments may be submitted by any of of notice of the filing of a proposed rule
[Release No. 34–79051; File No. SR–NYSE–
the following methods: 2016–55]
change, or within such longer period up
to 90 days as the Commission may
Electronic Comments
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New designate if it finds such longer period
• Use the Commission’s Internet York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of to be appropriate and publishes its
comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ Designation of a Longer Period for reasons for so finding or as to which the
rules/sro.shtml); or Commission Action on Proposed Rule self-regulatory organization consents,
Change Adopting Maximum Fees the Commission shall either approve the
• Send an email to rule-comments@ proposed rule change, disapprove the
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– Member Organizations May Charge in
Connection With the Distribution of proposed rule change, or institute
Phlx–2016–96 on the subject line. proceedings to determine whether the
Investment Company Shareholder
Paper Comments Reports Pursuant to Any Electronic proposed rule change should be
Delivery Rules Adopted by the disapproved. The 45th day for this filing
• Send paper comments in triplicate Securities and Exchange Commission is October 6, 2016.
to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities The Commission is extending the 45-
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street October 5, 2016.
On August 15, 2016, New York Stock day time period for Commission action
NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. on the proposed rule change. The
Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’) filed with the
All submissions should refer to File Securities and Exchange Commission Commission finds that it is appropriate
Number SR–Phlx–2016–96. This file (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section to designate a longer period within
number should be included on the 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act which to take action on the proposed
subject line if email is used. To help the of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 rule change so that it has sufficient time
Commission process and review your thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to to consider the Exchange’s proposal, as
comments more efficiently, please use adopt maximum fees NYSE member described above. Accordingly, pursuant
only one method. The Commission will organizations may charge in connection to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,6 and for
post all comments on the Commission’s with the distribution of investment the reason noted above, the Commission
Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ company shareholder reports pursuant designates November 20, 2016, as the
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the to any notice and access delivery rules date by which the Commission shall
submission, all subsequent adopted by the Commission. The either approve or disapprove or institute
amendments, all written statements proposed rule change was published for proceedings to determine whether to
with respect to the proposed rule comment in the Federal Register on disapprove the proposed rule change
change that are filed with the August 22, 2016.3 The Commission (File No. SR–NYSE–2016–55).
Commission, and all written received fourteen comment letters on For the Commission, by the Division of
communications relating to the the proposal.4 Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
proposed rule change between the authority.7
Commission and any person, other than 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). Brent J. Fields,
those that may be withheld from the 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. Secretary.
public in accordance with the 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78589
[FR Doc. 2016–24576 Filed 10–11–16; 8:45 am]
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be (August 16, 2016), 81 FR 56717.
4 See letters to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
available for Web site viewing and Commission from: James R. Rooney, Chief Financial
printing in the Commission’s Public Officer and Treasurer, Aril Investment Trust, dated
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., September 8, 2016; Mortimer J. Buckley, Chief SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
Washington, DC 20549, on official Investment Officer, Vanguard, dated September 12,
2016; Barbara Novick, Vice Chairman, and
COMMISSION
business days between the hours of Benjamin Archibald, Managing Director, BlackRock,
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the Inc., dated September 12, 2016; Charles V. Callan, [Release No. 34–79056; File No. SR–
filing also will be available for SVP Regulatory Affairs, Broadridge Financial NYSEMKT–2016–62]
inspection and copying at the principal Solutions, Inc., dated September 12, 2016; John
Zerr, Managing Director and General Counsel,
office of the Exchange. All comments Invesco Advisers, Inc., dated September 12, 2016; Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
received will be posted without change; Amy B.R. Lancellotta, Managing Director, MKT LLC; Order Granting Approval of
the Commission does not edit personal Independent Directors Council, dated September Proposed Rule Change Amending
identifying information from 12, 2016; David G. Booth, President and Co-Chief Section 146 of the NYSE MKT
Executive Officer, Dimensional Fund Advisers LP,
submissions. You should submit only dated September 12, 2016; David W. Blass, General Company Guide To Adjust the
information that you wish to make Counsel, Investment Company Institute, dated Entitlement to Services of Special
available publicly. All submissions September 12, 2016; Darrell N. Braman, Vice Purpose Acquisition Companies
should refer to File Number SR–Phlx– President & Managing Counsel, T. Rowe Price
Associates, Inc., dated September 12, 2016; Mark N. October 6, 2016.
2016–96 and should be submitted on or Polebaum, Executive Vice President and General
before November 2, 2016. Counsel, MFS Investment Management, dated I. Introduction
For the Commission, by the Division of September 12, 2016; Thomas E. Faust Jr., Chairman
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
and Chief Executive Officer, Eaton Vance Corp., On August 2, 2016, NYSE MKT LLC
dated September 12, 2016; Ellen Greene, Managing
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
authority.11 (‘‘NYSE MKT’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
Director, Securities Industry and Financial Markets
Brent J. Fields, Association, dated September 15, 2016; Christopher with the Securities and Exchange
O. Petersen, President, Columbia Mutual Funds, Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
Secretary. Columbia Threadneedle Investments, dated to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
[FR Doc. 2016–24572 Filed 10–11–16; 8:45 am] September 15, 2016 (‘‘Columbia Letter’’); and
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Rodney D. Johnson, Chairman, The Independent
5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
Directors of the Blackrock Equity-Liquidity Funds,
6 Id.
dated September 27, 2016 (‘‘Blackrock Directors
11 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). Letter’’). 7 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:13 Oct 11, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM 12OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_70646/page/1.svg)
![70452 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 197 / Wednesday, October 12, 2016 / Notices
change would enable it to compete for of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
the retention of these companies by thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to COMMISSION
offering them a package of adopt the Third Party Connectivity
complimentary products and services Service under Rules 7034(b) and 7051. Sunshine Act Meeting
that assist their transition to being a The proposed rule change was
publicly listed operating company for published for comment in the Federal Notice is hereby given, pursuant to
the first time.25 Further, the Register on September 2, 2016.3 The the provisions of the Government in the
Commission notes that other exchanges Commission received one comment in Sunshine Act, Public Law 94–409, that
have recently filed similar rule changes response to the proposal.4 The Exchange the Securities and Exchange
with respect to the timing of responded to the comment on October Commission will hold a closed meeting
complementary services offered to 4, 2016.5 on Thursday, October 13, 2016 at 2 p.m.
SPACs under their rules.26 The
Commission also notes that nothing in Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 6 provides Commissioners, Counsel to the
the Exchange’s rules requires a SPAC to that within 45 days of the publication of Commissioners, the Secretary to the
remain listed on the Exchange after it notice of the filing of a proposed rule Commission, and recording secretaries
meets the Business Combination change, or within such longer period up will attend the closed meeting. Certain
Condition and that such company is free to 90 days as the Commission may staff members who have an interest in
to list on other markets. Accordingly, designate if it finds such longer period the matters also may be present.
the Commission believes that the to be appropriate and publishes its
The General Counsel of the
proposed rule reflects the current reasons for so finding, or as to which the
self-regulatory organization consents, Commission, or her designee, has
competitive environment for exchange certified that, in her opinion, one or
listings among national securities the Commission shall either approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the more of the exemptions set forth in 5
exchanges, and is appropriate and U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10)
consistent with Section 6(b)(8) of the proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(7),
Act.27 (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit
proposed rule change should be
V. Conclusion disapproved. The 45th day after consideration of the scheduled matter at
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to publication of the notice for this the closed meeting.
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,28 that the proposed rule change is October 17, Commissioner Piwowar, as duty
proposed rule change (SR–NYSEMKT– 2016. The Commission is extending this officer, voted to consider the items
2016–62) be, and it hereby is, approved. 45-day time period. listed for the closed meeting in closed
For the Commission, by the Division of The Commission finds it appropriate session.
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated to designate a longer period within The subject matter of the closed
authority.29 which to take action on the proposed meeting will be:
Brent J. Fields, rule change so as to allow sufficient
time to consider the issues raised in the Institution and settlement of
Secretary.
Bats Letter and NASDAQ Response. injunctive actions;
[FR Doc. 2016–24608 Filed 10–11–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant Institution and settlement of
to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,7 administrative proceedings;
designates December 1, 2016, as the date Adjudicatory matters; and
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE by which the Commission shall either
approve or disapprove, or institute Other matters relating to enforcement
COMMISSION
proceedings to determine whether to proceedings.
[Release No. 34–79049; File No. SR– disapprove, the proposed rule change At times, changes in Commission
Nasdaq–2016–120] (File No. SR–Nasdaq–2016–120). priorities require alterations in the
For the Commission, by the Division of scheduling of meeting items.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated For further information and to
authority.8 ascertain what, if any, matters have been
Designation of a Longer Period for
Commission Action on Proposed Rule Brent J. Fields, added, deleted or postponed; please
Change To Adopt the Third Party Secretary. contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of
Connectivity Service Under Rules [FR Doc. 2016–24574 Filed 10–11–16; 8:45 am] the Secretary at (202) 551–5400.
7034(b) and 7051 BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
Dated: October 6, 2016.
October 5, 2016. 1 15
Brent J. Fields,
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
On August 16, 2016, the Nasdaq Stock 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. Secretary.
Market LLC (‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78713 [FR Doc. 2016–24732 Filed 10–7–16; 11:15 am]
Securities and Exchange Commission (August 29, 2016), 81 FR 60768. BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section 4 See letter from Eric Swanson, Esq., General
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act Counsel, Bats Global Markets, Inc., to Brent J.
Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, dated September 12, 2016 (‘‘Bats
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
25 See Notice, supra note 3, 81 FR at 56722. Letter’’).
26 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78782 5 See letter from Jeffrey S. Davis, Vice President
(September 7, 2016), 81 FR 62937 (September 13, and General Counsel, NASDAQ Stock Market LLC,
2016) (SR–NYSE–2016–58) and Securities Exchange to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and
Act Release No. 79025 (October 3, 2016) (SR– Exchange Commission, dated October 4, 2016
NASDAQ–2016–106). (‘‘NASDAQ Response’’).
27 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8). 6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
28 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 7 Id.
29 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 8 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:13 Oct 11, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\12OCN1.SGM 12OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_70646/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2016-10-12 00:55:31
Document Modified: 2016-10-12 00:55:31
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 70449 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR