81_FR_70858 81 FR 70660 - Fisheries off West Coast States; Highly Migratory Fisheries; California Drift Gillnet Fishery; Protected Species Hard Caps for the California/Oregon Large-Mesh Drift Gillnet Fishery

81 FR 70660 - Fisheries off West Coast States; Highly Migratory Fisheries; California Drift Gillnet Fishery; Protected Species Hard Caps for the California/Oregon Large-Mesh Drift Gillnet Fishery

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 198 (October 13, 2016)

Page Range70660-70663
FR Document2016-24780

NMFS is proposing regulations under the authority of Section 303(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (MSA) to implement an immediate closure of the California thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (DGN) (mesh size >=14 inches) fishery if a hard cap (i.e., limit) on mortality/injury is met or exceeded for certain protected species during a rolling 2-year period. The length of the closure would be dependent on when--during the 2-year period--the hard cap is reached.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 198 (Thursday, October 13, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 198 (Thursday, October 13, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70660-70663]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-24780]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 660

[Docket No. 160728670-6904-01]
RIN 0648-BG23


Fisheries off West Coast States; Highly Migratory Fisheries; 
California Drift Gillnet Fishery; Protected Species Hard Caps for the 
California/Oregon Large-Mesh Drift Gillnet Fishery

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Proposed rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS is proposing regulations under the authority of Section 
303(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act 
(MSA) to implement an immediate closure of the California thresher 
shark/swordfish drift gillnet (DGN) (mesh size >=14 inches) fishery if 
a hard cap (i.e., limit) on mortality/injury is met or exceeded for 
certain protected species during a rolling 2-year period. The length of 
the closure would be dependent on when--during the 2-year period--the 
hard cap is reached.

DATES: Comments on the proposed rule and supporting documents must be 
submitted in writing by November 28, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document, the draft 
Environmental Assessment (EA), draft Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) and 
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA), identified by NOAA-
NMFS-2016-0123, by any of the following methods:
     Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public 
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2016-0123, click the 
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or 
attach your comments.
     Mail: Submit written comments to Lyle Enriquez, NMFS West 
Coast Region, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802. 
Include the identifier ``NOAA-NMFS-2016-0123'' in the comments.
    Instructions: Comments must be submitted by one of the above 
methods to ensure they are received, documented, and considered by 
NMFS. Comments sent by any other method, to any other address or 
individual, or received after the end of the comment period, may not be 
considered. All comments received are a part of the public record and 
will generally be posted for public viewing on www.regulations.gov 
without change. All personal identifying information (e.g., name, 
address, etc.) submitted voluntarily by the sender will be publicly 
accessible. Do not submit confidential business information, or 
otherwise sensitive or protected information. NMFS will accept 
anonymous comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to 
remain anonymous).
    Copies of the draft EA, draft RIR, IRFA, and other supporting 
documents are available via the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov, docket NOAA-NMFS-2016-0123 or by contacting the 
Regional Administrator, Barry Thom, NMFS West Coast Region, 1201 NE. 
Lloyd Blvd., Portland, OR 97232-2182, or 
[email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lyle Enriquez, NMFS, West Coast 
Region, 562-980-4025, or [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The DGN fishery for swordfish and thresher shark (14'' minimum mesh 
size) is federally managed under the Federal Fishery Management Plan 
for U.S. West Coast Fisheries for Highly Migratory Species (HMS FMP) 
and via regulations of the states of California and Oregon to conserve 
target and non-target stocks, including protected species that are 
incidentally captured. The HMS FMP was prepared by the Pacific Fishery 
Management Council (Council) and is implemented under the authority of 
the MSA by regulations at 50 CFR part 660.
    The DGN fishery has been subject to a number of seasonal closures. 
Since 1982, it has been closed inside the entire U.S. West Coast 
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) from February 1 to April 30 of each year. 
In 1986, a closure was established within 75 miles of the California 
mainland from June 1 through Aug 14 of each year to conserve common 
thresher sharks; this closure was extended to include May in 1990 and 
later years. In 2001, NMFS implemented two Pacific sea turtle 
conservation areas on the U.S. West Coast with seasonal DGN 
restrictions to protect endangered leatherback and loggerhead sea 
turtles. The larger of the two closures spans the EEZ north of Point 
Conception, CA (34[deg]27' N. latitude) to mid-Oregon (45[deg] N. 
latitude) and west to 129[deg] W. longitude. DGN fishing is prohibited 
annually within this conservation area from August 15 to November 15 to 
protect leatherback sea turtles. A smaller closure was implemented to 
protect Pacific loggerhead turtles from DGN gear from June 1-August 31 
of each year during a forecasted or occurring El Ni[ntilde]o event, and 
is located south of Point Conception, CA, and east of 120[deg] W. 
longitude (72 FR 31756). The number of active vessels in the DGN 
fishery has remained under 50 vessels since 2003, and there has been an 
average of 20 active vessels per year from 2010 through 2015.
    Since 1990, NMFS has targeted 20 percent observer coverage of the 
DGN fishery each year, per recommendations from the Southwest Fisheries 
Science Center (NMFS 1989). NMFS' fleet-wide observer coverage target 
has been 30 percent since 2013. Since some DGN vessels are unobservable 
due to safety or accommodations requirements, the observable vessels 
are observed at a rate higher than 30 percent to attain the fleet-wide 
30 percent coverage. Four to six DGN vessels have been unobservable 
during each fishing season from 2011 to present.

Council Background

    In March 2012, the Council tasked NMFS with determining the steps 
needed to implement protected species hard caps in the DGN fishery. 
Originally concerned with sea turtle interactions, the Council expanded 
its scope to include marine mammals at its June 2014 meeting. At that 
meeting, the Council directed its Highly Migratory Species Management 
Team (HMSMT) to begin developing a range of alternatives

[[Page 70661]]

to establish hard caps on high-priority protected species (i.e. sea 
turtles and marine mammals) incidentally caught in the DGN fishery. In 
September 2014, the Council selected a Range of Alternatives and 
Preliminary Preferred Alternative (PPA); however, the HMSMT identified 
implementation issues with the Council's PPA, and an additional PPA, 
identified as the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) 
PPA, was selected in March 2015. In June, the Council added a 2-year 
hard cap sub-option to the Council hard cap PPA and the CDFW hard cap 
PPA, and an additional alternative that modified the CDFW PPA was added 
in September 2015. This alternative contained 2-year rolling hard caps 
based on observed mortality/injury; the Council selected this 
alternative as its Final Preferred Alternative (FPA).

Proposed Regulations for Hard Cap Limits

    The implementation of hard caps is intended to manage the fishery 
under the MSA to protect certain non-target species. Its purpose is not 
to manage marine mammal or endangered species populations, but rather 
to enhance the provisions of ESA and the MMPA under MSA Section 
303(b)(12) and National Standard 9. This proposed rule would implement 
the Council's FPA, which would establish 2-year rolling hard caps on 
observed mortality and injury to fin, humpback, and sperm whales, 
leatherback, loggerhead, olive ridley, and green sea turtles, short-fin 
pilot whales, and bottlenose dolphins in the DGN fishery. The 
definition of injury is taken from the NMFS West Coast Region Observer 
Program field manual. Observers record protected species released as 
Alive, Injured, or Dead. Observer program staff reviews observer data 
forms and notes to make a final determination of the condition of 
entangled protected species. To determine whether a hard cap has been 
reached, NMFS would count observed mortalities and injuries to these 
species during the current DGN fishing season (May 1 through January 
31) and the previous fishing season. If a cap were reached, the DGN 
fishery would close until the 2-year (i.e. two fishing seasons) 
mortality and injury for all species is below their hard cap value. The 
DGN fishery would then re-open on May 1 of the subsequent fishing 
season. The Council recommended hard cap values for when the DGN 
observer coverage level is less than 75 percent; the Council will 
revisit hard cap values when observer coverage becomes greater than 75 
percent.

 Table 1--Proposed Protected Species Hard Caps for Drift Gillnet Fishery
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Rolling 2-
                          Species                             year hard
                                                                 cap
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fin Whale..................................................            2
Humpback Whale.............................................            2
Sperm Whale................................................            2
Leatherback Sea Turtle.....................................            2
Loggerhead Sea Turtle......................................            2
Olive Ridley Sea Turtle....................................            2
Green Sea Turtle...........................................            2
Short-fin Pilot Whale (CA/OR/WA stock).....................            4
Bottlenose Dolphin (CA/OR/WA stock)........................            4
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fishery Closure Procedures

    NMFS will report observed protected species mortalities and 
injuries to help participants in the DGN fishery plan for the 
possibility of a hard cap being reached. If, as determined by NMFS, the 
DGN fleet meets or exceeds a hard cap during a rolling 2-year period, 
the fishery will be closed. NMFS will publish a notice in the Federal 
Register announcing the specified beginning and end dates of the 
closure. Upon the effective date identified in the Federal Register 
Notice, a DGN vessel may not be used to target, retain on board, 
transship, or land any additional fish using DGN gear in the U.S. West 
Coast EEZ during the period specified in the announcement. Any fish 
already on board a DGN fishing vessel on the effective date may be 
retained on board, transshipped, and/or landed, to the extent 
authorized by applicable laws and regulations, if they are landed 
within 4 days after the effective date. NMFS will notify vessel owners/
operators of the closure by Vessel Monitoring System communication to 
the fleet stating when large-mesh drift gillnet fishing is closed. 
Notification will also be made by postal mail and a posting on the NMFS 
regional Web site.

Classification

    Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the MSA, the NMFS West Coast 
Regional Administrator has determined that this proposed rule is 
consistent with the HMS FMP, other provisions of the MSA, and other 
applicable law, subject to further consideration after public comment.
    There are no new collection-of-information requirements associated 
with this action that are subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 
and existing collection-of-information requirements still apply under 
the following Control Numbers: 0648-0593. Notwithstanding any other 
provision of the law, no person is required to respond to, and no 
person shall be subject to penalty for failure to comply with, a 
collection-of-information subject to the requirements of the PRA, 
unless that collection-of-information displays a currently valid Office 
of Management and Budget control number.
    NMFS prepared a draft EA for the proposed regulations that 
discusses the impact on the environment as a result of this rule. The 
proposed action will have minor beneficial environmental impacts on 
target, not-target, and protected species and negative economic impacts 
to the DGN fleet. All of the proposed alternatives would result in a 
negative economic impact; however, the Council's FPA would result in a 
limited economic impact when compared to the other alternatives (a more 
detailed explanation can be found in the IRFA). A copy of the draft EA 
is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
    This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for 
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
    On December 29, 2015, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) 
issued a final rule establishing a small business size standard of $11 
million in annual gross receipts for all businesses primarily engaged 
in the commercial fishing industry (NAICS 11411) for Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (RFA) compliance purposes only (80 FR 81194, December 
29, 2015). The $11 million standard became effective on July 1, 2016, 
and is to be used in place of the U.S. Small Business Administration's 
(SBA) current standards of $20.5 million, $5.5 million, and $7.5 
million for the finfish (NAICS 114111), shellfish (NAICS 114112), and 
other marine fishing (NAICS 114119) sectors of the U.S. commercial 
fishing industry in all NMFS rules subject to the RFA after July 1, 
2016. Id. at 81194.
    An initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as 
required by section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The 
IRFA describes the economic impact this proposed rule, if adopted, 
would have on small entities. A description of the action, why it is 
being considered, and the legal basis for this action are contained at 
the beginning of this section in the preamble and in the SUMMARY 
section of the preamble. A summary of the analysis follows. A copy of 
this analysis is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
    There are currently 73 individual permit holders with valid 
California Department of Fish and Wildlife drift gillnet permits; 
however, many permits remain inactive. On average, 20 vessels

[[Page 70662]]

participated in the fishery each year from 2010 through 2015. In 2015, 
18 vessels participated in the fishery with total landings equaling 96 
metric tons (mt) (round weight), about 5.3 mt on average per vessel. 
Total landings included 18 mt of common thresher shark, 6 mt of 
shortfin mako shark, 66 mt of swordfish, and 5 mt of tunas. All 
participants in the fishery are considered small businesses since 
average annual per vessel revenues persist well below the $11 million 
threshold.
    The Council considered six alternatives for protected species hard 
caps for the DGN fishery before selecting Alternative 6 as their FPA. 
Compared to the baseline, the proposed regulatory action (i.e., based 
on Alternative 6) would result in a $4,596 annual loss per vessel based 
on a DGN fleet size of 20 vessels. These potential adverse economic 
effects of the proposed regulations appear to be limited. DGN effort is 
variable over the course of a fishing season, as vessels may choose to 
fish for salmon, albacore, and other marketable species based on 
abundance and environmental conditions, which may mitigate some of the 
anticipated economic losses. If vessel operators are successful in 
reducing the frequency of hard cap species catch in the future, the DGN 
fishery would close less often. However, given the many existing 
regulatory measures to reduce protected species interactions in the DGN 
fishery to minimal levels, the degree to which further take reductions 
can be realized through fishermen's deliberate effort to avoid reaching 
caps cannot be determined.
    Action Alternatives 1 through 4 were estimated to produce fewer 
costs to the fleet than the FPA; however, these alternatives presented 
significant implementation challenges. The evaluation of the fishery 
against hard caps in each of these Alternatives was based on an 
estimated mortality and serious injury (M&SI) calculation derived from 
observer coverage levels. The current NMFS process under the MMPA for 
making M&SI determinations is an extensive and multi-step process that 
takes months to complete and occurs at the end of each calendar year. 
It was deemed that this process, therefore, would not be responsive 
enough to inseason interactions with protected species. NMFS would have 
to create an expedited M&SI assessment process to make a more timely 
determination, which would have further delayed this action. 
Additionally, observer coverage rates for the DGN fishery vary between 
and within fishing seasons. This makes it difficult to determine the 
coverage rate at the time an interaction occurs and then extrapolate 
observed M&SI for comparison to the hard caps. Similarly, using a 
generalized observer coverage rate is problematic because DGN vessels 
often participate in multiple fisheries based on environmental factors 
and the presence of different species. This adds to the variation in 
observer coverage levels over the course of a fishing season. Lastly, 
because fishing effort has been low compared to historical levels, a 
small change in observed fishing effort can have a potentially big 
effect on the observer coverage rate if unobserved effort does not 
change commensurately.
    In response to the identified implementation issues with 
Alternatives 1 through 4, the CDFW proposed Alternative 5 with two sub-
Alternatives. Based on Alternative 5 sub-option 1, the DGN fishery 
would be expected to meet or exceed a hard cap seven out of thirteen 
fishing seasons, using historical observations (there is, however, less 
fishing effort in recent years, so the fishery would be expected to 
close fewer than seven times under this Alternative). Using Alternative 
5 sub-option 2, the fishery would be expected to close in 14.6 percent 
of simulated seasons, with the possibility of closing for more than one 
full fishing season. While Alternative 5 would produce greater 
beneficial effects to target, non-target, and protected species than 
the other alternatives, the results of the economic analysis indicate 
that it would have the greatest economic impact and not be conducive to 
supporting an economically viable swordfish fishery. The Council's FPA, 
Alternative 6, is the least costly alternative of those that did not 
present significant implementation issues.
    NMFS considers all entities subject to this action to be small 
entities as defined NMFS' size standards. The small entities that would 
be affected by the proposed action are all U.S. commercial DGN vessels 
that may be used in the California/Oregon large-mesh DGN fishery. 
Because each affected vessel is a small business, the proposed rule has 
an equal effect on all of these small entities. Therefore, the proposed 
action will impact all these small entities in the same manner. This 
rulemaking is not anticipated to have a significant economic impact on 
a substantial number of small entities, or place small entities at a 
disadvantage to large entities.

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660

    Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting, and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: October 6, 2016.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.

    For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is 
proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 660--FISHERIES OFF WEST COAST STATES

0
1. The authority citation for part 660 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq., and 
16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  660.702, add the definition for ``Injury'' in alphabetical 
order to read as follows:


Sec.  660.702  Definitions.

* * * * *
    Injury, when referring to marine mammals and sea turtles, means the 
animal has been released with obvious physical injury or with attached 
fishing gear.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec.  660.705, add paragraphs (tt) and (uu) to read as follows:


Sec.  660.705  Prohibitions.

* * * * *
    (tt) Fish with a large-mesh drift gillnet (mesh size >=14 inches) 
in the U.S. West Coast Exclusive Economic Zone during the time the 
fishery is closed pursuant to Sec.  660.713(h)(2)(ii).
    (uu) Retain on board, transship, or land any fish caught with a 
large-mesh drift gillnet (mesh size >=14 inches) later than 4 days 
after the effective date of a drift gillnet fishery closure and before 
the drift gillnet fishery re-opens pursuant to Sec.  660.713(h)(2)(ii).
0
4. In Sec.  660.713, add paragraph (h) to read as follows:


Sec.  660.713  Drift gillnet fishery.

* * * * *
    (h) Limits on protected species mortalities and injuries.
    (1) Maximum 2-year hard caps are established on the number of sea 
turtle and marine mammal mortalities and injuries that occur as a 
result of observed interactions with large-mesh drift gillnets (mesh 
size >=14 inches) deployed by vessels registered for use under HMS 
permits. Mortalities and injuries during the current fishing season 
(May 1 through January 31) and the previous fishing season are counted 
towards the hard caps. The mortality and injury hard caps are as 
follows:

[[Page 70663]]



------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Rolling 2-
                          Species                             year hard
                                                                 cap
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fin Whale..................................................            2
Humpback Whale.............................................            2
Sperm Whale................................................            2
Leatherback Sea Turtle.....................................            2
Loggerhead Sea Turtle......................................            2
Olive Ridley Sea Turtle....................................            2
Green Sea Turtle...........................................            2
Short-fin Pilot Whale (CA/OR/WA stock).....................            4
Bottlenose Dolphin (CA/OR/WA stock)........................            4
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (2) Upon determination by the Regional Administrator that, based on 
data from NMFS observers or a NMFS Electronic Monitoring program, the 
fishery has reached any of the protected species hard caps during a 
given 2-year period:
    (i) As soon as practicable, the Regional Administrator will file 
for publication at the Office of the Federal Register a notification 
that the fishery has reached a protected species hard cap. The 
notification will include an advisement that the large-mesh drift 
gillnet (mesh size >=14 inches) fishery shall be closed, and that drift 
gillnet fishing in the U.S. West Coast Exclusive Economic Zone by 
vessels registered for use under HMS permits will be prohibited 
beginning at a specified date and ending at a specified date. Drift 
gillnet fishing will then be allowed beginning May 1 of the year when 
observed mortality and injury of each species during the previous May 1 
through January 31 fishing season is below its hard cap value. 
Coincidental with the filing of the notification, the Regional 
Administrator will also provide actual notice that the large-mesh drift 
gillnet (mesh size >=14 inches) fishery shall be closed, and that drift 
gillnet fishing in the U.S. West Coast Exclusive Economic Zone by 
vessels registered for use under HMS permits will be prohibited 
beginning at a specified date, to all holders of HMS permits with a 
drift gillnet endorsement via VMS communication, postal mail, and a 
posting on the NMFS regional Web site.
    (ii) Beginning on the fishery closure date published in the Federal 
Register and indicated by the Regional Administrator in the 
notification provided to vessel operators and permit holders under 
paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this section, and until the specified ending 
date, the large-mesh drift gillnet (mesh size >=14 inches) fishery 
shall be closed. During the closure period commercial fishing vessels 
registered for use under HMS permits may not be used to target, retain 
on board, transship, or land fish captured with a large-mesh drift 
gillnet (mesh size >=14 inches), with the exception that any fish 
already on board a fishing vessel on the effective date of the notice 
may be retained on board, transshipped, and/or landed, to the extent 
authorized by applicable laws and regulations, provided such fish are 
landed within 4 days after the effective date published in the fishing 
closure notice.

[FR Doc. 2016-24780 Filed 10-12-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P



                                               70660                 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 198 / Thursday, October 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules

                                               We have scheduled a scoping webinar                     Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis               was prepared by the Pacific Fishery
                                               for October 20, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. during                (IRFA), identified by NOAA–NMFS–                      Management Council (Council) and is
                                               which we will take and discuss scoping                  2016–0123, by any of the following                    implemented under the authority of the
                                               comments on future Jonah crab                           methods:                                              MSA by regulations at 50 CFR part 660.
                                               regulations. Please use the link and call                  • Electronic Submission: Submit all                   The DGN fishery has been subject to
                                               in information provided below:                          electronic public comments via the                    a number of seasonal closures. Since
                                                 • Webinar: https://                                   Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to                    1982, it has been closed inside the
                                               noaaevents.webex.com/noaaevents/                        http://www.regulations.gov/                           entire U.S. West Coast exclusive
                                               onstage/g.php?MTID=ed272b501b73                         #!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-2016-                      economic zone (EEZ) from February 1 to
                                               da9f75dff6eb36ca49229,                                  0123, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,                April 30 of each year. In 1986, a closure
                                                 • Webinar access code: Meeting123,                    complete the required fields, and enter               was established within 75 miles of the
                                                 • Telephone Number: 877–661–2084,                     or attach your comments.                              California mainland from June 1
                                                 • Participant Code: 613780.                              • Mail: Submit written comments to                 through Aug 14 of each year to conserve
                                                                                                       Lyle Enriquez, NMFS West Coast                        common thresher sharks; this closure
                                                  Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
                                                                                                       Region, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite 4200,               was extended to include May in 1990
                                                 Dated: October 6, 2016.                               Long Beach, CA 90802. Include the                     and later years. In 2001, NMFS
                                               Samuel D. Rauch III,                                    identifier ‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2016–0123’’                    implemented two Pacific sea turtle
                                               Deputy Assistant Administrator for                      in the comments.                                      conservation areas on the U.S. West
                                               Regulatory Programs, National Marine                       Instructions: Comments must be                     Coast with seasonal DGN restrictions to
                                               Fisheries Service.                                      submitted by one of the above methods                 protect endangered leatherback and
                                               [FR Doc. 2016–24746 Filed 10–12–16; 8:45 am]            to ensure they are received,                          loggerhead sea turtles. The larger of the
                                               BILLING CODE 3510–22–P                                  documented, and considered by NMFS.                   two closures spans the EEZ north of
                                                                                                       Comments sent by any other method, to                 Point Conception, CA (34°27′ N.
                                                                                                       any other address or individual, or                   latitude) to mid-Oregon (45° N. latitude)
                                               DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE                                  received after the end of the comment                 and west to 129° W. longitude. DGN
                                                                                                       period, may not be considered. All                    fishing is prohibited annually within
                                               National Oceanic and Atmospheric                        comments received are a part of the                   this conservation area from August 15 to
                                               Administration                                          public record and will generally be                   November 15 to protect leatherback sea
                                                                                                       posted for public viewing on                          turtles. A smaller closure was
                                               50 CFR Part 660                                         www.regulations.gov without change.                   implemented to protect Pacific
                                               [Docket No. 160728670–6904–01]                          All personal identifying information                  loggerhead turtles from DGN gear from
                                                                                                       (e.g., name, address, etc.) submitted                 June 1–August 31 of each year during a
                                               RIN 0648–BG23                                                                                                 forecasted or occurring El Niño event,
                                                                                                       voluntarily by the sender will be
                                                                                                       publicly accessible. Do not submit                    and is located south of Point
                                               Fisheries off West Coast States; Highly
                                                                                                       confidential business information, or                 Conception, CA, and east of 120° W.
                                               Migratory Fisheries; California Drift
                                                                                                       otherwise sensitive or protected                      longitude (72 FR 31756). The number of
                                               Gillnet Fishery; Protected Species
                                                                                                       information. NMFS will accept                         active vessels in the DGN fishery has
                                               Hard Caps for the California/Oregon
                                                                                                       anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in                  remained under 50 vessels since 2003,
                                               Large-Mesh Drift Gillnet Fishery
                                                                                                       the required fields if you wish to remain             and there has been an average of 20
                                               AGENCY:  National Marine Fisheries                      anonymous).                                           active vessels per year from 2010
                                               Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and                       Copies of the draft EA, draft RIR,                 through 2015.
                                               Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),                      IRFA, and other supporting documents                     Since 1990, NMFS has targeted 20
                                               Commerce.                                               are available via the Federal                         percent observer coverage of the DGN
                                               ACTION: Proposed rule; request for                      eRulemaking Portal: http://                           fishery each year, per recommendations
                                                                                                       www.regulations.gov, docket NOAA–                     from the Southwest Fisheries Science
                                               comments.
                                                                                                       NMFS–2016–0123 or by contacting the                   Center (NMFS 1989). NMFS’ fleet-wide
                                               SUMMARY:   NMFS is proposing                            Regional Administrator, Barry Thom,                   observer coverage target has been 30
                                               regulations under the authority of                      NMFS West Coast Region, 1201 NE.                      percent since 2013. Since some DGN
                                               Section 303(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens                  Lloyd Blvd., Portland, OR 97232–2182,                 vessels are unobservable due to safety or
                                               Fishery Conservation and Management                     or RegionalAdministrator.WCRHMS@                      accommodations requirements, the
                                               Act (MSA) to implement an immediate                     noaa.gov.                                             observable vessels are observed at a rate
                                               closure of the California thresher shark/                                                                     higher than 30 percent to attain the
                                                                                                       FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lyle                 fleet-wide 30 percent coverage. Four to
                                               swordfish drift gillnet (DGN) (mesh size                Enriquez, NMFS, West Coast Region,
                                               ≥14 inches) fishery if a hard cap (i.e.,                562–980–4025, or Lyle.Enriquez@
                                                                                                                                                             six DGN vessels have been unobservable
                                               limit) on mortality/injury is met or                                                                          during each fishing season from 2011 to
                                                                                                       noaa.gov.                                             present.
                                               exceeded for certain protected species
                                               during a rolling 2-year period. The                     SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                                                                             Council Background
                                               length of the closure would be                          Background
                                               dependent on when—during the 2-year                                                                             In March 2012, the Council tasked
                                               period—the hard cap is reached.                            The DGN fishery for swordfish and                  NMFS with determining the steps
                                                                                                       thresher shark (14″ minimum mesh size)                needed to implement protected species
                                               DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
                                                                                                       is federally managed under the Federal                hard caps in the DGN fishery. Originally
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                               and supporting documents must be                        Fishery Management Plan for U.S. West                 concerned with sea turtle interactions,
                                               submitted in writing by November 28,                    Coast Fisheries for Highly Migratory                  the Council expanded its scope to
                                               2016.                                                   Species (HMS FMP) and via regulations                 include marine mammals at its June
                                               ADDRESSES:  You may submit comments                     of the states of California and Oregon to             2014 meeting. At that meeting, the
                                               on this document, the draft                             conserve target and non-target stocks,                Council directed its Highly Migratory
                                               Environmental Assessment (EA), draft                    including protected species that are                  Species Management Team (HMSMT) to
                                               Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) and                      incidentally captured. The HMS FMP                    begin developing a range of alternatives


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   13:36 Oct 12, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00014   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM   13OCP1


                                                                     Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 198 / Thursday, October 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules                                                    70661

                                               to establish hard caps on high-priority                        TABLE 1—PROPOSED PROTECTED the law, no person is required to
                                               protected species (i.e. sea turtles and                       SPECIES HARD CAPS FOR DRIFT respond to, and no person shall be
                                               marine mammals) incidentally caught in                        GILLNET FISHERY             subject to penalty for failure to comply
                                               the DGN fishery. In September 2014, the                                                                                  with, a collection-of-information subject
                                               Council selected a Range of Alternatives                                                                   Rolling       to the requirements of the PRA, unless
                                               and Preliminary Preferred Alternative                                    Species                           2-year        that collection-of-information displays a
                                               (PPA); however, the HMSMT identified                                                                      hard cap       currently valid Office of Management
                                               implementation issues with the                                                                                           and Budget control number.
                                                                                                       Fin Whale .................................                  2      NMFS prepared a draft EA for the
                                               Council’s PPA, and an additional PPA,                   Humpback Whale .....................                         2
                                               identified as the California Department                 Sperm Whale ............................                     2
                                                                                                                                                                        proposed regulations that discusses the
                                               of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) PPA, was                    Leatherback Sea Turtle ............                          2   impact on the environment as a result
                                               selected in March 2015. In June, the                    Loggerhead Sea Turtle .............                          2   of this rule. The proposed action will
                                               Council added a 2-year hard cap sub-                    Olive Ridley Sea Turtle ............                         2   have minor beneficial environmental
                                               option to the Council hard cap PPA and                  Green Sea Turtle ......................                      2   impacts on target, not-target, and
                                               the CDFW hard cap PPA, and an                           Short-fin Pilot Whale (CA/OR/                                    protected species and negative
                                                                                                         WA stock) ..............................                   4   economic impacts to the DGN fleet. All
                                               additional alternative that modified the                Bottlenose Dolphin (CA/OR/WA
                                               CDFW PPA was added in September                                                                                          of the proposed alternatives would
                                                                                                         stock) .....................................               4
                                               2015. This alternative contained 2-year                                                                                  result in a negative economic impact;
                                               rolling hard caps based on observed                                                                                      however, the Council’s FPA would
                                                                                                       Fishery Closure Procedures                                       result in a limited economic impact
                                               mortality/injury; the Council selected
                                               this alternative as its Final Preferred                    NMFS will report observed protected                           when compared to the other alternatives
                                               Alternative (FPA).                                      species mortalities and injuries to help                         (a more detailed explanation can be
                                                                                                       participants in the DGN fishery plan for                         found in the IRFA). A copy of the draft
                                               Proposed Regulations for Hard Cap                       the possibility of a hard cap being                              EA is available from NMFS (see
                                               Limits                                                  reached. If, as determined by NMFS, the                          ADDRESSES).
                                                                                                       DGN fleet meets or exceeds a hard cap                               This proposed rule has been
                                                  The implementation of hard caps is                   during a rolling 2-year period, the                              determined to be not significant for
                                               intended to manage the fishery under                    fishery will be closed. NMFS will                                purposes of Executive Order 12866.
                                               the MSA to protect certain non-target                   publish a notice in the Federal Register                            On December 29, 2015, the National
                                               species. Its purpose is not to manage                   announcing the specified beginning and                           Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) issued
                                               marine mammal or endangered species                     end dates of the closure. Upon the                               a final rule establishing a small business
                                               populations, but rather to enhance the                  effective date identified in the Federal                         size standard of $11 million in annual
                                               provisions of ESA and the MMPA under                    Register Notice, a DGN vessel may not                            gross receipts for all businesses
                                               MSA Section 303(b)(12) and National                     be used to target, retain on board,                              primarily engaged in the commercial
                                               Standard 9. This proposed rule would                    transship, or land any additional fish                           fishing industry (NAICS 11411) for
                                               implement the Council’s FPA, which                      using DGN gear in the U.S. West Coast                            Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
                                               would establish 2-year rolling hard caps                EEZ during the period specified in the                           compliance purposes only (80 FR
                                               on observed mortality and injury to fin,                announcement. Any fish already on                                81194, December 29, 2015). The $11
                                               humpback, and sperm whales,                             board a DGN fishing vessel on the                                million standard became effective on
                                               leatherback, loggerhead, olive ridley,                  effective date may be retained on board,                         July 1, 2016, and is to be used in place
                                               and green sea turtles, short-fin pilot                  transshipped, and/or landed, to the                              of the U.S. Small Business
                                               whales, and bottlenose dolphins in the                  extent authorized by applicable laws                             Administration’s (SBA) current
                                               DGN fishery. The definition of injury is                and regulations, if they are landed                              standards of $20.5 million, $5.5 million,
                                               taken from the NMFS West Coast Region                   within 4 days after the effective date.                          and $7.5 million for the finfish (NAICS
                                               Observer Program field manual.                          NMFS will notify vessel owners/                                  114111), shellfish (NAICS 114112), and
                                               Observers record protected species                      operators of the closure by Vessel                               other marine fishing (NAICS 114119)
                                               released as Alive, Injured, or Dead.                    Monitoring System communication to                               sectors of the U.S. commercial fishing
                                               Observer program staff reviews observer                 the fleet stating when large-mesh drift                          industry in all NMFS rules subject to
                                               data forms and notes to make a final                    gillnet fishing is closed. Notification                          the RFA after July 1, 2016. Id. at 81194.
                                               determination of the condition of                       will also be made by postal mail and a                              An initial regulatory flexibility
                                               entangled protected species. To                         posting on the NMFS regional Web site.                           analysis (IRFA) was prepared, as
                                               determine whether a hard cap has been                                                                                    required by section 603 of the
                                               reached, NMFS would count observed                      Classification                                                   Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA). The
                                               mortalities and injuries to these species                 Pursuant to section 304(b)(1)(A) of the                        IRFA describes the economic impact
                                               during the current DGN fishing season                   MSA, the NMFS West Coast Regional                                this proposed rule, if adopted, would
                                               (May 1 through January 31) and the                      Administrator has determined that this                           have on small entities. A description of
                                               previous fishing season. If a cap were                  proposed rule is consistent with the                             the action, why it is being considered,
                                               reached, the DGN fishery would close                    HMS FMP, other provisions of the MSA,                            and the legal basis for this action are
                                               until the 2-year (i.e. two fishing seasons)             and other applicable law, subject to                             contained at the beginning of this
                                               mortality and injury for all species is                 further consideration after public                               section in the preamble and in the
                                               below their hard cap value. The DGN                     comment.                                                         SUMMARY section of the preamble. A
                                               fishery would then re-open on May 1 of                    There are no new collection-of-                                summary of the analysis follows. A copy
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                               the subsequent fishing season. The                      information requirements associated                              of this analysis is available from NMFS
                                               Council recommended hard cap values                     with this action that are subject to the                         (see ADDRESSES).
                                               for when the DGN observer coverage                      Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), and                                  There are currently 73 individual
                                               level is less than 75 percent; the Council              existing collection-of-information                               permit holders with valid California
                                               will revisit hard cap values when                       requirements still apply under the                               Department of Fish and Wildlife drift
                                               observer coverage becomes greater than                  following Control Numbers: 0648–0593.                            gillnet permits; however, many permits
                                               75 percent.                                             Notwithstanding any other provision of                           remain inactive. On average, 20 vessels


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   13:36 Oct 12, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000    Frm 00015     Fmt 4702      Sfmt 4702     E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM   13OCP1


                                               70662                 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 198 / Thursday, October 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules

                                               participated in the fishery each year                   within fishing seasons. This makes it                   Dated: October 6, 2016.
                                               from 2010 through 2015. In 2015, 18                     difficult to determine the coverage rate              Samuel D. Rauch III,
                                               vessels participated in the fishery with                at the time an interaction occurs and                 Deputy Assistant Administrator for
                                               total landings equaling 96 metric tons                  then extrapolate observed M&SI for                    Regulatory Programs, National Marine
                                               (mt) (round weight), about 5.3 mt on                    comparison to the hard caps. Similarly,               Fisheries Service.
                                               average per vessel. Total landings                      using a generalized observer coverage
                                               included 18 mt of common thresher                       rate is problematic because DGN vessels                 For the reasons set out in the
                                               shark, 6 mt of shortfin mako shark, 66                  often participate in multiple fisheries               preamble, 50 CFR part 660 is proposed
                                               mt of swordfish, and 5 mt of tunas. All                 based on environmental factors and the                to be amended as follows:
                                               participants in the fishery are                         presence of different species. This adds
                                                                                                                                                             PART 660—FISHERIES OFF WEST
                                               considered small businesses since                       to the variation in observer coverage
                                               average annual per vessel revenues                      levels over the course of a fishing                   COAST STATES
                                               persist well below the $11 million                      season. Lastly, because fishing effort has
                                               threshold.                                              been low compared to historical levels,               ■ 1. The authority citation for part 660
                                                  The Council considered six                           a small change in observed fishing effort             continues to read as follows:
                                               alternatives for protected species hard                 can have a potentially big effect on the                Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq., 16
                                               caps for the DGN fishery before                         observer coverage rate if unobserved                  U.S.C. 773 et seq., and 16 U.S.C. 7001 et seq.
                                               selecting Alternative 6 as their FPA.                   effort does not change commensurately.
                                               Compared to the baseline, the proposed                     In response to the identified                      ■  2. In § 660.702, add the definition for
                                               regulatory action (i.e., based on                       implementation issues with Alternatives               ‘‘Injury’’ in alphabetical order to read as
                                               Alternative 6) would result in a $4,596                 1 through 4, the CDFW proposed                        follows:
                                               annual loss per vessel based on a DGN                   Alternative 5 with two sub-Alternatives.              § 660.702   Definitions.
                                               fleet size of 20 vessels. These potential               Based on Alternative 5 sub-option 1, the              *     *     *     *    *
                                               adverse economic effects of the                         DGN fishery would be expected to meet
                                               proposed regulations appear to be                       or exceed a hard cap seven out of                       Injury, when referring to marine
                                               limited. DGN effort is variable over the                thirteen fishing seasons, using historical            mammals and sea turtles, means the
                                               course of a fishing season, as vessels                  observations (there is, however, less                 animal has been released with obvious
                                               may choose to fish for salmon, albacore,                fishing effort in recent years, so the                physical injury or with attached fishing
                                               and other marketable species based on                   fishery would be expected to close                    gear.
                                               abundance and environmental                             fewer than seven times under this                     *     *     *     *    *
                                               conditions, which may mitigate some of                  Alternative). Using Alternative 5 sub-                ■ 3. In § 660.705, add paragraphs (tt)
                                               the anticipated economic losses. If                     option 2, the fishery would be expected               and (uu) to read as follows:
                                               vessel operators are successful in                      to close in 14.6 percent of simulated
                                               reducing the frequency of hard cap                      seasons, with the possibility of closing              § 660.705   Prohibitions.
                                               species catch in the future, the DGN                    for more than one full fishing season.                *      *     *     *     *
                                               fishery would close less often. However,                While Alternative 5 would produce
                                               given the many existing regulatory                      greater beneficial effects to target, non-              (tt) Fish with a large-mesh drift gillnet
                                               measures to reduce protected species                    target, and protected species than the                (mesh size ≥14 inches) in the U.S. West
                                               interactions in the DGN fishery to                      other alternatives, the results of the                Coast Exclusive Economic Zone during
                                               minimal levels, the degree to which                     economic analysis indicate that it would              the time the fishery is closed pursuant
                                               further take reductions can be realized                 have the greatest economic impact and                 to § 660.713(h)(2)(ii).
                                               through fishermen’s deliberate effort to                not be conducive to supporting an                       (uu) Retain on board, transship, or
                                               avoid reaching caps cannot be                           economically viable swordfish fishery.                land any fish caught with a large-mesh
                                               determined.                                             The Council’s FPA, Alternative 6, is the              drift gillnet (mesh size ≥14 inches) later
                                                  Action Alternatives 1 through 4 were                 least costly alternative of those that did            than 4 days after the effective date of a
                                               estimated to produce fewer costs to the                 not present significant implementation                drift gillnet fishery closure and before
                                               fleet than the FPA; however, these                      issues.                                               the drift gillnet fishery re-opens
                                               alternatives presented significant                         NMFS considers all entities subject to             pursuant to § 660.713(h)(2)(ii).
                                               implementation challenges. The                          this action to be small entities as                   ■ 4. In § 660.713, add paragraph (h) to
                                               evaluation of the fishery against hard                  defined NMFS’ size standards. The                     read as follows:
                                               caps in each of these Alternatives was                  small entities that would be affected by
                                               based on an estimated mortality and                     the proposed action are all U.S.                      § 660.713   Drift gillnet fishery.
                                               serious injury (M&SI) calculation                       commercial DGN vessels that may be                    *      *     *    *     *
                                               derived from observer coverage levels.                  used in the California/Oregon large-
                                               The current NMFS process under the                                                                              (h) Limits on protected species
                                                                                                       mesh DGN fishery. Because each
                                               MMPA for making M&SI determinations                                                                           mortalities and injuries.
                                                                                                       affected vessel is a small business, the
                                               is an extensive and multi-step process                  proposed rule has an equal effect on all                (1) Maximum 2-year hard caps are
                                               that takes months to complete and                       of these small entities. Therefore, the               established on the number of sea turtle
                                               occurs at the end of each calendar year.                proposed action will impact all these                 and marine mammal mortalities and
                                               It was deemed that this process,                        small entities in the same manner. This               injuries that occur as a result of
                                               therefore, would not be responsive                      rulemaking is not anticipated to have a               observed interactions with large-mesh
                                               enough to inseason interactions with                                                                          drift gillnets (mesh size ≥14 inches)
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                                                                                       significant economic impact on a
                                               protected species. NMFS would have to                   substantial number of small entities, or              deployed by vessels registered for use
                                               create an expedited M&SI assessment                     place small entities at a disadvantage to             under HMS permits. Mortalities and
                                               process to make a more timely                           large entities.                                       injuries during the current fishing
                                               determination, which would have                                                                               season (May 1 through January 31) and
                                               further delayed this action.                            List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 660                   the previous fishing season are counted
                                               Additionally, observer coverage rates for                 Fisheries, Fishing, Reporting, and                  towards the hard caps. The mortality
                                               the DGN fishery vary between and                        recordkeeping requirements.                           and injury hard caps are as follows:


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   13:36 Oct 12, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00016   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM   13OCP1


                                                                           Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 198 / Thursday, October 13, 2016 / Proposed Rules                                                   70663

                                                                                                    Rolling       advisement that the large-mesh drift                     (ii) Beginning on the fishery closure
                                                                Species                             2-year        gillnet (mesh size ≥14 inches) fishery                date published in the Federal Register
                                                                                                   hard cap       shall be closed, and that drift gillnet               and indicated by the Regional
                                                                                                                  fishing in the U.S. West Coast Exclusive              Administrator in the notification
                                               Fin Whale .................................                    2
                                                                                                                  Economic Zone by vessels registered for               provided to vessel operators and permit
                                               Humpback Whale .....................                           2
                                               Sperm Whale ............................                       2   use under HMS permits will be                         holders under paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this
                                               Leatherback Sea Turtle ............                            2   prohibited beginning at a specified date              section, and until the specified ending
                                               Loggerhead Sea Turtle .............                            2   and ending at a specified date. Drift                 date, the large-mesh drift gillnet (mesh
                                               Olive Ridley Sea Turtle ............                           2   gillnet fishing will then be allowed                  size ≥14 inches) fishery shall be closed.
                                               Green Sea Turtle ......................                        2   beginning May 1 of the year when
                                                                                                                                                                        During the closure period commercial
                                               Short-fin Pilot Whale (CA/OR/                                      observed mortality and injury of each
                                                 WA stock) ..............................                     4                                                         fishing vessels registered for use under
                                                                                                                  species during the previous May 1
                                               Bottlenose Dolphin (CA/OR/WA                                       through January 31 fishing season is                  HMS permits may not be used to target,
                                                 stock) .....................................                 4   below its hard cap value. Coincidental                retain on board, transship, or land fish
                                                                                                                  with the filing of the notification, the              captured with a large-mesh drift gillnet
                                                  (2) Upon determination by the                                   Regional Administrator will also                      (mesh size ≥14 inches), with the
                                               Regional Administrator that, based on                              provide actual notice that the large-                 exception that any fish already on board
                                               data from NMFS observers or a NMFS                                 mesh drift gillnet (mesh size ≥14 inches)             a fishing vessel on the effective date of
                                               Electronic Monitoring program, the                                 fishery shall be closed, and that drift               the notice may be retained on board,
                                               fishery has reached any of the protected                           gillnet fishing in the U.S. West Coast                transshipped, and/or landed, to the
                                               species hard caps during a given 2-year                            Exclusive Economic Zone by vessels                    extent authorized by applicable laws
                                               period:                                                            registered for use under HMS permits                  and regulations, provided such fish are
                                                  (i) As soon as practicable, the                                 will be prohibited beginning at a                     landed within 4 days after the effective
                                               Regional Administrator will file for                               specified date, to all holders of HMS                 date published in the fishing closure
                                               publication at the Office of the Federal                           permits with a drift gillnet endorsement              notice.
                                               Register a notification that the fishery                           via VMS communication, postal mail,                   [FR Doc. 2016–24780 Filed 10–12–16; 8:45 am]
                                               has reached a protected species hard                               and a posting on the NMFS regional
                                                                                                                                                                        BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
                                               cap. The notification will include an                              Web site.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014        13:36 Oct 12, 2016         Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00017   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 9990   E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM   13OCP1



Document Created: 2016-10-13 00:53:22
Document Modified: 2016-10-13 00:53:22
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionProposed rule; request for comments.
DatesComments on the proposed rule and supporting documents must be submitted in writing by November 28, 2016.
ContactLyle Enriquez, NMFS, West Coast Region, 562-980-4025, or [email protected]
FR Citation81 FR 70660 
RIN Number0648-BG23
CFR AssociatedFisheries; Fishing; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR