81_FR_70921 81 FR 70723 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Supplementary Material .20 to Rule 103

81 FR 70723 - Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Supplementary Material .20 to Rule 103

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 198 (October 13, 2016)

Page Range70723-70726
FR Document2016-24775

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 198 (Thursday, October 13, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 198 (Thursday, October 13, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70723-70726]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-24775]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-79071; File No. SR-NYSE-2016-64]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; 
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change 
Amending Supplementary Material .20 to Rule 103

October 7, 2016.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby 
given that on September 22, 2016, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' 
or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``SEC'' or the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described 
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the 
self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice 
to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested 
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Supplementary Material .20 to Rule 
103 (``NYSE Rule 103.20''), to reduce the Minimum Net Liquid Assets 
requirement for Designated Market Maker (``DMM'') units. The proposed 
rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at 
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public 
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared 
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most 
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Rule 103.20, which sets forth 
the net liquid assets requirements for a member organization that 
operates as a DMM unit on the Exchange,\4\ to reduce the Minimum Net 
Liquid Assets requirement for DMM units.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Pursuant to Rule 2(j), a DMM unit is defined as a member 
organization or unit within a member organization that has been 
approved to act as a DMM unit under Rule 98. Pursuant to Rule 2(i), 
a DMM is defined as an individual member, officer, partner, employee 
or associated person of a DMM unit who is approved by the Exchange 
to act in the capacity of a DMM. All references to rules herein are 
to NYSE rules, unless otherwise noted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Current Rule
    Rule 103.20 sets forth a Net Liquid Assets requirement for each DMM 
unit \5\ in addition to the SEC Net Capital Rule \6\ minimum net 
capital requirement applicable to market-making activities. The purpose 
of the Exchange's requirement is to reasonably assure that each DMM 
unit maintains sufficient liquidity to carry out its obligation to 
maintain a fair and orderly market in its assigned securities in times 
of market stress. The formula for the current net liquid assets 
requirement was established in July 2011, which resulted in the 
aggregate net liquid assets of all DMM units equaling at least $125 
million.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ All DMMs on the Exchange are required to comply with Rule 
104.
    \6\ See 17 CFR 240.15c3-1.
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64918 (July 19, 
2011), 76 FR 44390 (July 25, 2011) (SR-NYSE-2011-35) (``Release No. 
64918'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under current Rule 103.20(b), each DMM unit must maintain or have 
allocated to it Net Liquid Assets that are the greater of (1) $1 
million, or (2) $125,000 for each one-tenth of one percent (0.1%) of 
Exchange transaction dollar volume \8\ in its registered securities. A 
DMM unit must inform the Exchange immediately whenever the DMM unit is 
unable to comply with these requirements.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The term ``Exchange transaction dollar volume'' means the 
most recent Statistical Data, calculated and provided by the NYSE on 
a monthly basis. See Rule 103.20(a)(4).
    \9\ See Rule 103.20(c)(1)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Current Rule 103.20(a) defines ``Net Liquid Assets'' as the sum of 
(A) ``Excess Net Capital'' and (B) ``Liquidity'' dedicated to the DMM 
unit. Excess Net Capital has the same meaning as the term excess net 
capital as computed in accordance with the

[[Page 70724]]

SEC Net Capital Rule,\10\ which means the amount identified as item 
number 3770 of SEC Form X-17A-5 (``FOCUS Report''), except for DMM 
units that compute net capital under the alternative standard, for 
which it would mean item number 3910 of the FOCUS Report. Liquidity is 
defined as undrawn or actual borrowings that are dedicated to the DMM 
unit's business, as specified in Rule 103.20(a)(3)(A)-(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See note 6 supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If two or more DMM units are associated with each other and deal 
for the same DMM unit account, then the Net Liquid Assets requirements 
of Rule 103.20 applies to such DMM units as one unit, rather than to 
each DMM unit individually. Any joint account must be approved by the 
Exchange.\11\ The Exchange may allow a DMM unit to operate despite 
noncompliance with the provisions of the minimum requirements of Rule 
103.20, for up to five business days from the date the DMM notifies the 
Exchange of such condition.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Rule 103.20(b)(3).
    \12\ See id. at (c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background and Proposed Rule Change
    On July 25, 2006, the SEC approved amendments to the predecessor of 
current Rule 103.20 that set the Net Liquid Asset requirement 
applicable to specialist member organizations at $1 billion.\13\ In 
February 2008, based on significant changes in the NYSE's market 
structure resulting in reduced specialist participation, position 
levels, and performance during periods of high market volatility, this 
amount was reduced to $250 million.\14\ In July 2011, once again 
relying on significant changes in the NYSE's market structure as well 
as market-wide regulatory and trading developments and trends, the Net 
Liquid Asset requirement in Rule 103.20 was reduced to the current $125 
million.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54205 (July 25, 
2006), 71 FR 43260 (July 31, 2006) (SR-NYSE-2005-38) (approving 
amendments to NYSE Rules 104 and 123E (``Specialist Combination 
Review Policy'') that changed the capital requirements of specialist 
organizations). See also NYSE Information Memo 06-56 (August 2, 
2006).
    \14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57272 (February 5, 
2008), 73 FR 8098 (February 12, 2008) (SR-NYSE-2007-101).
    \15\ See note 7 supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A determination of whether the Net Liquid Assets requirement will 
be adequate to support the liquidity needs of DMM units to perform 
their obligations to the market during periods of market stress 
involves consideration and assessment of many factors, including market 
structure developments, market fragmentation, DMM unit end-of-day 
inventory positions and position duration, and the use of technology to 
manage market volatility. Since July 2011, the Exchange has continued 
to regularly assess these factors.
    Market-wide developments since 2011 have continued to dampen 
volatility and reduce DMM unit risk levels. Specifically, the 
implementation in April 2013 of market-wide volatility controls as part 
of the Regulation NMS Plan to Address Extraordinary Market Volatility 
(``Limit Up/Limit Down'') significantly mitigated industry-wide risks 
by limiting single-stock and market-wide volatility throughout the 
trading day.\16\ Additional initiatives since 2011, including enhanced 
technology resulting in reduced trading latency levels, clearing 
organization risk control enhancements, tighter percentage triggers on 
market-wide circuit breakers,\17\ pre-trade risk controls to prevent 
the routing of orders that exceed credit or capital thresholds (i.e., 
SEC Rule 15c3-5,\18\ the ``Market Access Rule''), and clearly defined 
Clearly Erroneous Execution parameters and processes,\19\ have all 
contributed to reducing the potential for significant and/or rapid 
movements in the market and to help DMM units satisfy their obligation 
to maintain an orderly market in assigned securities in times of market 
stress.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77679 (April 21, 
2016), 81 FR 24908 (April 27, 2016) (File No. 4-631) (Order 
approving 10th Amendment to the Limit Up Limit Down Plan).
    \17\ See Rule 80B.
    \18\ See 17 CFR 240.15c3-5.
    \19\ See Rule 128.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Since 2011, market fragmentation has increased the amount of off-
exchange trading in NYSE-listed securities. Trading on the Trade 
Reporting Facility (``TRF'') in NYSE-listed securities increased from 
29.8% year-to-date between January-May 2011 to 34.7% year-to-date 
between January-May 2016. There are currently 13 competing exchanges 
trading NYSE-listed securities and one-third of NYSE consolidated 
volume is traded off-exchange on over 30 dark pools and over 200 
upstairs trading desks.
    The net liquid asset requirement should be reasonably related to 
the amount of trading that DMM units transact within the NYSE's market 
share and dollar value traded. The Exchange believes that as NYSE share 
and dollar volume has declined, the amount of net liquid assets 
required to meet the DMM unit's obligations should similarly decline. 
The Exchange notes that both the overall consolidated Tape A volume as 
well as the Exchange's average daily volume of shares traded have 
declined since 2011 (6% and 13% YTD, respectively), therefore resulting 
in less trading both market-wide and at the Exchange in the securities 
assigned to DMMs.
    The growth in NYSE's Supplemental Liquidity Provider (``SLP'') 
program, implemented in October 2008 and made permanent in July 
2015,\20\ has increased liquidity provider participation across a 
broader group of market participants, thereby also helping to reduce 
DMM risk. Today, around one-third of liquidity provider participation 
comes from nine firms participating in the SLP program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75578 (July 31, 
2015), 80 FR 47008 (August 6, 2015) (SR-NYSE-2015-26).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The disparity between the current capital requirement and DMM gross 
inventory levels is also significant. End-of-day DMM average gross 
inventory positions have declined 27% from $74 million in the January-
June 2011 period to $54 million in the January-June 2016 period, 
reducing overnight risk exposure. The current $125 million capital 
requirement is 2.3 times greater than the gross inventory level of $53 
million (long market value plus short market value) and 34 times 
greater than the average net inventory level of $3.6 million (long 
market value--short market value).
    DMM units are also putting fewer dollars at risk on a given trade, 
and less capital is needed to support the resultant positions. This 
trend is largely the result of the DMM units' increased use of 
algorithms to trade in smaller order sizes to reduce risk exposure. The 
industry's increased use of algorithms to trade in small order sizes to 
reduce risk exposure has resulted in a 14% decline in the average NYSE 
intraday trade size from 2011 to 2016 year-to-date through May 2016, 
resulting in fewer DMM shares at risk on a given trade.
    Moreover, DMM liquidity provider and other payments to DMMs have 
increased since 2011. In particular, DMM rebates per share have 
increased from $0.0015, $0.0025 and $0.0030 in mid-2011 to $0.0027, 
$0.0031, $0.0034 today. Further, quote market data revenue payments 
have been expanded to cover less-active securities under 1.5 million in 
consolidated volume versus 1 million in consolidated volume in 2011, 
and monthly flat payments have been introduced between $100 to $500 per 
security for less active securities under 1.5 million in consolidated 
volume. By reducing the DMM's costs per share traded, the Exchange 
believes that higher trading rebates and other

[[Page 70725]]

payments to DMMs have reduced overall DMM trading risk.
    Further, the DMM units' increasing use of trading technology and 
faster NYSE execution speeds enable DMMs to reduce order exposure time 
and better manage the risks of positions held. Faster NYSE executions 
speeds and DMM units' use of algorithms allow them to adjust positions 
quickly in response to changing market dynamics. The NYSE has also 
reduced the time needed to incorporate market information into quotes, 
thereby allowing for better risk controls mechanisms by DMMs. Median 
order-to-acknowledgement latency for NYSE gateways declined 81% between 
June 2011 and June 2016.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ The Exchange notes that multi-asset market makers mitigate 
risk by hedging between different products. Technology advances like 
use of microwave towers has reduced data transmission times helping 
firms to better manage risks and hedge price differences between 
equities/ETFs generally trading in the New York area and futures 
generally trading in the Chicago area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on the foregoing, the Exchange believes that it is 
appropriate to reduce the Net Liquid Assets requirement for all DMM 
units by an additional 40% to $75 million.
    The Exchange notes that the Exchange and FINRA will continue to 
assess DMM capital requirements and monitor capital positions on a 
daily basis.
    The Exchange will notify DMM units of the implementation date of 
this rule change via a Member Education Bulletin.
    The proposed change is not otherwise intended to address any other 
issues and the Exchange is not aware of any problems that DMM units 
would have in complying with the proposed change.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\22\ in general, and furthers the 
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\23\ in particular, because it 
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, 
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster 
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, 
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and 
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and 
perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market and a national market 
system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest 
and because it is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between 
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed change would remove 
impediments to, and perfect the mechanisms of, a free and open market 
and a national market system by reducing the burden on DMM units to 
maintain net liquidity while still reasonably ensuring that DMM units 
have sufficient liquidity to carry out their obligations to maintain an 
orderly market in their assigned securities in times of market stress. 
In this regard, the Exchange notes that overall DMM unit risk levels 
have continued to decline due to, among other things, implementation of 
market-wide volatility controls (e.g., Limit Up/Limit Down price 
controls), enhanced technology resulting in reduced trading latency 
levels, clearing organization risk control enhancements, tighter 
percentage triggers on market-wide circuit breakers, pre-trade risk 
controls (i.e., the Market Access Rule), and clearly defined Clearly 
Erroneous Execution parameters and processes. These initiatives have 
contributed to reducing the potential for significant and/or rapid 
movements in the market and provide support to DMM units in satisfying 
their obligation to maintain an orderly market in assigned securities 
in times of market stress. The Exchange further believes that continued 
market fragmentation, the decline in the average value of DMM units' 
end-of-day position inventories and the shorter duration of positions, 
lower per share trading costs and improved technology to manage market 
risk also support the proposed rule change.
    The Exchange further believes that the proposed change would 
protect investors and the public interest by reducing existing barriers 
to entry for new DMM units and mitigating the potential loss of 
existing DMM units. Stabilizing and increasing the pool of DMM units 
with a more efficient financial structure would be beneficial to the 
Exchange and would also enhance market quality and thereby support 
investor protection and public interest goals. Finally, the Exchange 
believes that it is subject to significant competitive forces, as 
described below in the Exchange's statement regarding the burden on 
competition.
    For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal 
is consistent with the Act.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change is 
designed to amend the structure of DMM unit financial requirements. 
This proposed change would eliminate a potential barrier to entry for 
new DMM units interested in operating on both markets, thereby 
promoting competition.
    The Exchange notes that market makers and traders on other U.S. 
equity exchanges are not subject to net capital requirements beyond 
those required by the SEC Net Capital Rule. Nonetheless, DMM units have 
unique affirmative obligations and the Exchange continues to believe 
that it is appropriate that their financial requirements be higher than 
other market participants. The proposal would support competition by 
making DMM unit financial requirements more manageable for member 
organizations, including both existing and potential future DMM units, 
and would thereby promote greater interest in seeking DMM unit 
appointments on the Exchange.
    Finally, the Exchange notes that it operates in a highly 
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor 
competing venues. In such an environment, the Exchange must continually 
review, and consider adjusting the services it offers and the 
requirements it imposes to remain competitive with other U.S. equity 
exchanges.
    For the reasons described above, the Exchange believes that the 
proposed rule change reflects this competitive environment.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \24\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\25\ 
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the 
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any 
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to 
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as 
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of

[[Page 70726]]

investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become 
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \25\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \26\ normally 
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the 
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),\27\ the Commission 
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the 
protection of investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \27\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or 
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or 
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission 
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under 
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \28\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-NYSE-2016-64 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, 
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2016-64. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all 
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are 
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to 
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other 
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does 
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should 
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2016-64 and should be 
submitted on or before November 3, 2016.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\29\
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2016-24775 Filed 10-12-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P



                                                                         Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 198 / Thursday, October 13, 2016 / Notices                                                   70723

                                             of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE                               A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                             thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to                  COMMISSION                                            Statement of the Purpose of, and the
                                             list and trade shares of the                                                                                  Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
                                             AdvisorShares KIM Korea Equity ETF                      [Release No. 34–79071; File No. SR–NYSE–              Change
                                             under NYSE Arca Equities Rule 8.600.                    2016–64]                                              1. Purpose
                                             On May 13, 2016, the Exchange
                                             submitted Amendment No. 1 to the                        Self-Regulatory Organizations; New                      The Exchange proposes to amend
                                             proposed rule change.3 The Commission                   York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of                    NYSE Rule 103.20, which sets forth the
                                             published notice of the proposed rule                   Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of                 net liquid assets requirements for a
                                             change, as modified by Amendment No.                    Proposed Rule Change Amending                         member organization that operates as a
                                             1, in the Federal Register on May 23,                   Supplementary Material .20 to Rule 103                DMM unit on the Exchange,4 to reduce
                                             2016.4 On May 23, 2016, the Exchange                                                                          the Minimum Net Liquid Assets
                                             submitted Amendment No. 2 to the                        October 7, 2016.                                      requirement for DMM units.
                                             proposed rule change.5 On July 7, 2016,                    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the              Current Rule
                                             pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,6               Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
                                                                                                                                                              Rule 103.20 sets forth a Net Liquid
                                             the Commission designated a longer                      ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
                                                                                                                                                           Assets requirement for each DMM unit 5
                                             period within which to approve the                      notice is hereby given that on
                                                                                                                                                           in addition to the SEC Net Capital Rule 6
                                             proposed rule change, disapprove the                    September 22, 2016, New York Stock                    minimum net capital requirement
                                             proposed rule change, or institute                      Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the                         applicable to market-making activities.
                                             proceedings to determine whether to                     ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities               The purpose of the Exchange’s
                                             disapprove the proposed rule change.7                   and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or                   requirement is to reasonably assure that
                                             On August 18, 2016, the Commission                      the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule                 each DMM unit maintains sufficient
                                             instituted proceedings under Section                    change as described in Items I, II, and               liquidity to carry out its obligation to
                                             19(b)(2)(B) of the Act 8 to determine                   III below, which Items have been                      maintain a fair and orderly market in its
                                             whether to approve or disapprove the                    prepared by the self-regulatory                       assigned securities in times of market
                                             proposed rule change.9 The Commission                   organization. The Commission is                       stress. The formula for the current net
                                             received no comments on the proposed                    publishing this notice to solicit                     liquid assets requirement was
                                             rule change. On September 28, 2016, the                 comments on the proposed rule change                  established in July 2011, which resulted
                                             Exchange withdrew the proposed rule                     from interested persons.                              in the aggregate net liquid assets of all
                                             change.                                                                                                       DMM units equaling at least $125
                                                                                                     I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                     million.7
                                               For the Commission, by the Division of                Statement of the Terms of Substance of
                                             Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated                                                                       Under current Rule 103.20(b), each
                                                                                                     the Proposed Rule Change
                                             authority.10                                                                                                  DMM unit must maintain or have
                                             Brent J. Fields,                                           The Exchange proposes to amend                     allocated to it Net Liquid Assets that are
                                                                                                     Supplementary Material .20 to Rule 103                the greater of (1) $1 million, or (2)
                                             Secretary.                                                                                                    $125,000 for each one-tenth of one
                                             [FR Doc. 2016–24699 Filed 10–12–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                     (‘‘NYSE Rule 103.20’’), to reduce the
                                                                                                     Minimum Net Liquid Assets                             percent (0.1%) of Exchange transaction
                                             BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
                                                                                                     requirement for Designated Market                     dollar volume 8 in its registered
                                                                                                     Maker (‘‘DMM’’) units. The proposed                   securities. A DMM unit must inform the
                                                                                                                                                           Exchange immediately whenever the
                                                                                                     rule change is available on the
                                                                                                                                                           DMM unit is unable to comply with
                                                                                                     Exchange’s Web site at www.nyse.com,
                                                                                                                                                           these requirements.9
                                                                                                     at the principal office of the Exchange,
                                                                                                     and at the Commission’s Public                           Current Rule 103.20(a) defines ‘‘Net
                                                                                                                                                           Liquid Assets’’ as the sum of (A)
                                                                                                     Reference Room.
                                                                                                                                                           ‘‘Excess Net Capital’’ and (B)
                                                                                                     II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s                    ‘‘Liquidity’’ dedicated to the DMM unit.
                                                                                                     Statement of the Purpose of, and                      Excess Net Capital has the same
                                                                                                     Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule                meaning as the term excess net capital
                                                                                                     Change                                                as computed in accordance with the
                                               1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
                                               2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.                                     In its filing with the Commission, the                 4 Pursuant to Rule 2(j), a DMM unit is defined as

                                               3 Amendment No. 1 replaced and superseded the         self-regulatory organization included                 a member organization or unit within a member
                                             original filing in its entirety. Amendment No. 1 is     statements concerning the purpose of,                 organization that has been approved to act as a
                                             available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-                                                                 DMM unit under Rule 98. Pursuant to Rule 2(i), a
                                                                                                     and basis for, the proposed rule change               DMM is defined as an individual member, officer,
                                             nysearca-2016-64/nysearca201664-1.pdf.
                                               4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34–
                                                                                                     and discussed any comments it received                partner, employee or associated person of a DMM
                                                                                                     on the proposed rule change. The text                 unit who is approved by the Exchange to act in the
                                             77847 (May 17, 2016), 81 FR 32364.                                                                            capacity of a DMM. All references to rules herein
                                               5 Amendment No. 2 replaced and superseded the         of those statements may be examined at                are to NYSE rules, unless otherwise noted.
                                             original filing in its entirety. Amendment No. 2 is     the places specified in Item IV below.                   5 All DMMs on the Exchange are required to

                                             available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-           The Exchange has prepared summaries,                  comply with Rule 104.
                                                                                                                                                              6 See 17 CFR 240.15c3–1.
                                             nysearca-2016-64/nysearca201664-2.pdf.                  set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES




                                               6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).                                                                                         7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 64918
                                                                                                     of the most significant parts of such
                                               7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78240,                                                            (July 19, 2011), 76 FR 44390 (July 25, 2011) (SR–
                                                                                                     statements.                                           NYSE–2011–35) (‘‘Release No. 64918’’).
                                             81 FR 45332 (July 13, 2016).                                                                                     8 The term ‘‘Exchange transaction dollar volume’’
                                               8 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
                                                                                                                                                           means the most recent Statistical Data, calculated
                                               9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78614,        1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                              and provided by the NYSE on a monthly basis. See
                                             81 FR 57981 (August 24, 2016).                            2 15 U.S.C. 78a.                                    Rule 103.20(a)(4).
                                               10 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).                              3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.                                    9 See Rule 103.20(c)(1)(A).




                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:07 Oct 12, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00060   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM   13OCN1


                                             70724                       Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 198 / Thursday, October 13, 2016 / Notices

                                             SEC Net Capital Rule,10 which means                     DMM unit end-of-day inventory                          volume of shares traded have declined
                                             the amount identified as item number                    positions and position duration, and the               since 2011 (6% and 13% YTD,
                                             3770 of SEC Form X–17A–5 (‘‘FOCUS                       use of technology to manage market                     respectively), therefore resulting in less
                                             Report’’), except for DMM units that                    volatility. Since July 2011, the Exchange              trading both market-wide and at the
                                             compute net capital under the                           has continued to regularly assess these                Exchange in the securities assigned to
                                             alternative standard, for which it would                factors.                                               DMMs.
                                             mean item number 3910 of the FOCUS                         Market-wide developments since                         The growth in NYSE’s Supplemental
                                             Report. Liquidity is defined as undrawn                 2011 have continued to dampen                          Liquidity Provider (‘‘SLP’’) program,
                                             or actual borrowings that are dedicated                 volatility and reduce DMM unit risk                    implemented in October 2008 and made
                                             to the DMM unit’s business, as specified                levels. Specifically, the implementation               permanent in July 2015,20 has increased
                                             in Rule 103.20(a)(3)(A)–(C).                            in April 2013 of market-wide volatility                liquidity provider participation across a
                                                If two or more DMM units are                         controls as part of the Regulation NMS                 broader group of market participants,
                                             associated with each other and deal for                 Plan to Address Extraordinary Market                   thereby also helping to reduce DMM
                                             the same DMM unit account, then the                     Volatility (‘‘Limit Up/Limit Down’’)                   risk. Today, around one-third of
                                             Net Liquid Assets requirements of Rule                  significantly mitigated industry-wide                  liquidity provider participation comes
                                             103.20 applies to such DMM units as                     risks by limiting single-stock and                     from nine firms participating in the SLP
                                             one unit, rather than to each DMM unit                  market-wide volatility throughout the                  program.
                                             individually. Any joint account must be                 trading day.16 Additional initiatives                     The disparity between the current
                                             approved by the Exchange.11 The                         since 2011, including enhanced                         capital requirement and DMM gross
                                             Exchange may allow a DMM unit to                        technology resulting in reduced trading                inventory levels is also significant. End-
                                             operate despite noncompliance with the                  latency levels, clearing organization risk             of-day DMM average gross inventory
                                             provisions of the minimum                               control enhancements, tighter                          positions have declined 27% from $74
                                             requirements of Rule 103.20, for up to                  percentage triggers on market-wide                     million in the January–June 2011 period
                                             five business days from the date the                    circuit breakers,17 pre-trade risk                     to $54 million in the January–June 2016
                                             DMM notifies the Exchange of such                       controls to prevent the routing of orders              period, reducing overnight risk
                                             condition.12                                            that exceed credit or capital thresholds               exposure. The current $125 million
                                                                                                     (i.e., SEC Rule 15c3–5,18 the ‘‘Market                 capital requirement is 2.3 times greater
                                             Background and Proposed Rule Change
                                                                                                     Access Rule’’), and clearly defined                    than the gross inventory level of $53
                                                On July 25, 2006, the SEC approved                   Clearly Erroneous Execution parameters                 million (long market value plus short
                                             amendments to the predecessor of                        and processes,19 have all contributed to               market value) and 34 times greater than
                                             current Rule 103.20 that set the Net                    reducing the potential for significant                 the average net inventory level of $3.6
                                             Liquid Asset requirement applicable to                  and/or rapid movements in the market                   million (long market value—short
                                             specialist member organizations at $1                   and to help DMM units satisfy their                    market value).
                                             billion.13 In February 2008, based on                   obligation to maintain an orderly market                  DMM units are also putting fewer
                                             significant changes in the NYSE’s                       in assigned securities in times of market              dollars at risk on a given trade, and less
                                             market structure resulting in reduced                   stress.                                                capital is needed to support the
                                             specialist participation, position levels,                 Since 2011, market fragmentation has                resultant positions. This trend is largely
                                             and performance during periods of high                  increased the amount of off-exchange                   the result of the DMM units’ increased
                                             market volatility, this amount was                      trading in NYSE-listed securities.                     use of algorithms to trade in smaller
                                             reduced to $250 million.14 In July 2011,                Trading on the Trade Reporting Facility                order sizes to reduce risk exposure. The
                                             once again relying on significant                       (‘‘TRF’’) in NYSE-listed securities                    industry’s increased use of algorithms to
                                             changes in the NYSE’s market structure                  increased from 29.8% year-to-date                      trade in small order sizes to reduce risk
                                             as well as market-wide regulatory and                   between January–May 2011 to 34.7%                      exposure has resulted in a 14% decline
                                             trading developments and trends, the                    year-to-date between January–May 2016.                 in the average NYSE intraday trade size
                                             Net Liquid Asset requirement in Rule                    There are currently 13 competing                       from 2011 to 2016 year-to-date through
                                             103.20 was reduced to the current $125                  exchanges trading NYSE-listed                          May 2016, resulting in fewer DMM
                                             million.15                                              securities and one-third of NYSE                       shares at risk on a given trade.
                                                A determination of whether the Net                   consolidated volume is traded off-                        Moreover, DMM liquidity provider
                                             Liquid Assets requirement will be                       exchange on over 30 dark pools and                     and other payments to DMMs have
                                             adequate to support the liquidity needs                 over 200 upstairs trading desks.                       increased since 2011. In particular,
                                             of DMM units to perform their                              The net liquid asset requirement                    DMM rebates per share have increased
                                             obligations to the market during periods                should be reasonably related to the                    from $0.0015, $0.0025 and $0.0030 in
                                             of market stress involves consideration                 amount of trading that DMM units                       mid-2011 to $0.0027, $0.0031, $0.0034
                                             and assessment of many factors,                         transact within the NYSE’s market share                today. Further, quote market data
                                             including market structure                              and dollar value traded. The Exchange                  revenue payments have been expanded
                                             developments, market fragmentation,                     believes that as NYSE share and dollar                 to cover less-active securities under 1.5
                                                                                                     volume has declined, the amount of net                 million in consolidated volume versus 1
                                               10 See  note 6 supra.                                 liquid assets required to meet the DMM                 million in consolidated volume in 2011,
                                               11 See  Rule 103.20(b)(3).                            unit’s obligations should similarly                    and monthly flat payments have been
                                                12 See id. at (c)(2).
                                                                                                     decline. The Exchange notes that both                  introduced between $100 to $500 per
                                                13 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54205
                                                                                                     the overall consolidated Tape A volume
                                             (July 25, 2006), 71 FR 43260 (July 31, 2006) (SR–                                                              security for less active securities under
                                                                                                     as well as the Exchange’s average daily
                                             NYSE–2005–38) (approving amendments to NYSE                                                                    1.5 million in consolidated volume. By
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES




                                             Rules 104 and 123E (‘‘Specialist Combination                                                                   reducing the DMM’s costs per share
                                                                                                       16 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 77679
                                             Review Policy’’) that changed the capital
                                             requirements of specialist organizations). See also     (April 21, 2016), 81 FR 24908 (April 27, 2016) (File   traded, the Exchange believes that
                                             NYSE Information Memo 06–56 (August 2, 2006).           No. 4–631) (Order approving 10th Amendment to          higher trading rebates and other
                                                14 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57272     the Limit Up Limit Down Plan).
                                                                                                       17 See Rule 80B.
                                             (February 5, 2008), 73 FR 8098 (February 12, 2008)                                                                20 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75578
                                             (SR–NYSE–2007–101).                                       18 See 17 CFR 240.15c3–5.
                                                                                                                                                            (July 31, 2015), 80 FR 47008 (August 6, 2015) (SR–
                                                15 See note 7 supra.                                   19 See Rule 128.                                     NYSE–2015–26).



                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:07 Oct 12, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00061   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM   13OCN1


                                                                         Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 198 / Thursday, October 13, 2016 / Notices                                              70725

                                             payments to DMMs have reduced                           discrimination between customers,                     necessary or appropriate in furtherance
                                             overall DMM trading risk.                               issuers, brokers, or dealers.                         of the purposes of the Act. The
                                                Further, the DMM units’ increasing                      The Exchange believes that the                     proposed change is designed to amend
                                             use of trading technology and faster                    proposed change would remove                          the structure of DMM unit financial
                                             NYSE execution speeds enable DMMs to                    impediments to, and perfect the                       requirements. This proposed change
                                             reduce order exposure time and better                   mechanisms of, a free and open market                 would eliminate a potential barrier to
                                             manage the risks of positions held.                     and a national market system by                       entry for new DMM units interested in
                                             Faster NYSE executions speeds and                       reducing the burden on DMM units to                   operating on both markets, thereby
                                             DMM units’ use of algorithms allow                      maintain net liquidity while still                    promoting competition.
                                             them to adjust positions quickly in                     reasonably ensuring that DMM units                       The Exchange notes that market
                                             response to changing market dynamics.                   have sufficient liquidity to carry out                makers and traders on other U.S. equity
                                             The NYSE has also reduced the time                      their obligations to maintain an orderly              exchanges are not subject to net capital
                                             needed to incorporate market                            market in their assigned securities in                requirements beyond those required by
                                             information into quotes, thereby                        times of market stress. In this regard, the           the SEC Net Capital Rule. Nonetheless,
                                             allowing for better risk controls                       Exchange notes that overall DMM unit                  DMM units have unique affirmative
                                             mechanisms by DMMs. Median order-                       risk levels have continued to decline                 obligations and the Exchange continues
                                             to-acknowledgement latency for NYSE                     due to, among other things,                           to believe that it is appropriate that their
                                             gateways declined 81% between June                      implementation of market-wide                         financial requirements be higher than
                                             2011 and June 2016.21                                   volatility controls (e.g., Limit Up/Limit             other market participants. The proposal
                                                                                                     Down price controls), enhanced                        would support competition by making
                                                Based on the foregoing, the Exchange                 technology resulting in reduced trading
                                             believes that it is appropriate to reduce                                                                     DMM unit financial requirements more
                                                                                                     latency levels, clearing organization risk            manageable for member organizations,
                                             the Net Liquid Assets requirement for                   control enhancements, tighter
                                             all DMM units by an additional 40% to                                                                         including both existing and potential
                                                                                                     percentage triggers on market-wide                    future DMM units, and would thereby
                                             $75 million.                                            circuit breakers, pre-trade risk controls             promote greater interest in seeking
                                                The Exchange notes that the Exchange                 (i.e., the Market Access Rule), and                   DMM unit appointments on the
                                             and FINRA will continue to assess                       clearly defined Clearly Erroneous                     Exchange.
                                             DMM capital requirements and monitor                    Execution parameters and processes.                      Finally, the Exchange notes that it
                                             capital positions on a daily basis.                     These initiatives have contributed to                 operates in a highly competitive market
                                                The Exchange will notify DMM units                   reducing the potential for significant                in which market participants can
                                             of the implementation date of this rule                 and/or rapid movements in the market                  readily favor competing venues. In such
                                             change via a Member Education                           and provide support to DMM units in                   an environment, the Exchange must
                                             Bulletin.                                               satisfying their obligation to maintain an            continually review, and consider
                                                The proposed change is not otherwise                 orderly market in assigned securities in              adjusting the services it offers and the
                                             intended to address any other issues                    times of market stress. The Exchange                  requirements it imposes to remain
                                             and the Exchange is not aware of any                    further believes that continued market                competitive with other U.S. equity
                                             problems that DMM units would have                      fragmentation, the decline in the                     exchanges.
                                             in complying with the proposed change.                  average value of DMM units’ end-of-day                   For the reasons described above, the
                                                                                                     position inventories and the shorter                  Exchange believes that the proposed
                                             2. Statutory Basis                                      duration of positions, lower per share                rule change reflects this competitive
                                                The Exchange believes that the                       trading costs and improved technology                 environment.
                                             proposed rule change is consistent with                 to manage market risk also support the
                                                                                                     proposed rule change.                                 C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                             Section 6(b) of the Act,22 in general, and
                                                                                                        The Exchange further believes that the             Statement on Comments on the
                                             furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5)
                                                                                                     proposed change would protect                         Proposed Rule Change Received From
                                             of the Act,23 in particular, because it is
                                                                                                     investors and the public interest by                  Members, Participants, or Others
                                             designed to prevent fraudulent and
                                             manipulative acts and practices, to                     reducing existing barriers to entry for                 No written comments were solicited
                                             promote just and equitable principles of                new DMM units and mitigating the                      or received with respect to the proposed
                                             trade, to foster cooperation and                        potential loss of existing DMM units.                 rule change.
                                             coordination with persons engaged in                    Stabilizing and increasing the pool of
                                                                                                                                                           III. Date of Effectiveness of the
                                             regulating, clearing, settling, processing              DMM units with a more efficient
                                                                                                                                                           Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
                                             information with respect to, and                        financial structure would be beneficial
                                                                                                                                                           Commission Action
                                             facilitating transactions in securities, to             to the Exchange and would also
                                             remove impediments to, and perfect the                  enhance market quality and thereby                       The Exchange has filed the proposed
                                             mechanisms of, a free and open market                   support investor protection and public                rule change pursuant to Section
                                             and a national market system and, in                    interest goals. Finally, the Exchange                 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 24 and Rule
                                             general, to protect investors and the                   believes that it is subject to significant            19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.25 Because the
                                             public interest and because it is not                   competitive forces, as described below                proposed rule change does not: (i)
                                             designed to permit unfair                               in the Exchange’s statement regarding                 Significantly affect the protection of
                                                                                                     the burden on competition.                            investors or the public interest; (ii)
                                               21 The Exchange notes that multi-asset market            For the foregoing reasons, the                     impose any significant burden on
                                             makers mitigate risk by hedging between different       Exchange believes that the proposal is                competition; and (iii) become operative
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES




                                             products. Technology advances like use of               consistent with the Act.                              prior to 30 days from the date on which
                                             microwave towers has reduced data transmission                                                                it was filed, or such shorter time as the
                                             times helping firms to better manage risks and          B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                                                                                                                           Commission may designate, if
                                             hedge price differences between equities/ETFs           Statement on Burden on Competition
                                             generally trading in the New York area and futures                                                            consistent with the protection of
                                             generally trading in the Chicago area.                    The Exchange does not believe that
                                               22 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).                                  the proposed rule change will impose                    24 15   U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
                                               23 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).                               any burden on competition that is not                   25 17   CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).



                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:07 Oct 12, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00062   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM    13OCN1


                                             70726                        Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 198 / Thursday, October 13, 2016 / Notices

                                             investors and the public interest, the                  Commission, and all written                           I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                             proposed rule change has become                         communications relating to the                        Statement of the Terms of Substance of
                                             effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)               proposed rule change between the                      the Proposed Rule Change
                                             of the Act and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)                    Commission and any person, other than                    The Exchange proposes to amend a
                                             thereunder.                                             those that may be withheld from the                   current billing practice with respect to
                                                A proposed rule change filed under                   public in accordance with the                         billing disputes.
                                             Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 26 normally does not                   provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be                      The text of the proposed rule change
                                             become operative prior to 30 days after                 available for Web site viewing and                    is available on the Exchange’s Web site
                                             the date of the filing. However, pursuant               printing in the Commission’s Public                   at www.ise.com, at the principal office
                                             to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),27 the Commission               Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,                     of the Exchange, and at the
                                             may designate a shorter time if such                    Washington, DC 20549 on official                      Commission’s Public Reference Room.
                                             action is consistent with the protection                business days between the hours of
                                             of investors and the public interest.                   10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the                II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                                At any time within 60 days of the                    filing also will be available for                     Statement of the Purpose of, and
                                             filing of such proposed rule change, the                inspection and copying at the principal               Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
                                             Commission summarily may                                office of the Exchange. All comments                  Change
                                             temporarily suspend such rule change if                 received will be posted without change;                  In its filing with the Commission, the
                                             it appears to the Commission that such                  the Commission does not edit personal                 Exchange included statements
                                             action is necessary or appropriate in the               identifying information from                          concerning the purpose of and basis for
                                             public interest, for the protection of                  submissions. You should submit only                   the proposed rule change and discussed
                                             investors, or otherwise in furtherance of               information that you wish to make                     any comments it received on the
                                             the purposes of the Act. If the                         available publicly. All submissions                   proposed rule change. The text of these
                                             Commission takes such action, the                       should refer to File Number SR–NYSE–                  statements may be examined at the
                                             Commission shall institute proceedings                  2016–64 and should be submitted on or                 places specified in Item IV below. The
                                             under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 28 of the Act to              before November 3, 2016.                              Exchange has prepared summaries, set
                                             determine whether the proposed rule                                                                           forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
                                             change should be approved or                              For the Commission, by the Division of
                                                                                                     Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
                                                                                                                                                           the most significant aspects of such
                                             disapproved.                                                                                                  statements.
                                                                                                     authority.29
                                             IV. Solicitation of Comments                            Robert W. Errett,                                     A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
                                               Interested persons are invited to                     Deputy Secretary.                                     Statement of the Purpose of, and
                                             submit written data, views, and                         [FR Doc. 2016–24775 Filed 10–12–16; 8:45 am]
                                                                                                                                                           Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
                                             arguments concerning the foregoing,                                                                           Change
                                                                                                     BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
                                             including whether the proposed rule
                                                                                                                                                           1. Purpose
                                             change is consistent with the Act.
                                             Comments may be submitted by any of                                                                              The Exchange proposes to amend its
                                                                                                     SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE                               Schedule of Fees to change the
                                             the following methods:                                  COMMISSION                                            timeframe within which Members must
                                             Electronic Comments                                                                                           dispute billing. Today, ISE Mercury
                                               • Use the Commission’s Internet                       [Release No. 34–79059; File No. SR–                   Members must submit all disputes no
                                             comment form (http://www.sec.gov/                       ISEMercury–2016–17]                                   later than ninety calendar days after
                                             rules/sro.shtml); or                                                                                          receipt of an Exchange invoice. After
                                               • Send an email to rule-comments@                     Self-Regulatory Organizations; ISE                    ninety calendar days, all fees assessed
                                             sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–                 Mercury, LLC; Notice of Filing and                    by the Exchange are considered final.
                                             NYSE–2016–64 on the subject line.                       Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed                   The Exchange is proposing to amend the
                                                                                                     Rule Change To Amend a Current                        policy from ninety to sixty days to
                                             Paper Comments                                          Billing Practice With Respect to Billing              submit a dispute. Today, the NASDAQ
                                               • Send paper comments in triplicate                   Disputes                                              PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’), NASDAQ BX, Inc.
                                             to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities                                                                     (‘‘BX’’) and The NASDAQ Options
                                                                                                     October 6, 2016.
                                             and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street                                                                         Market LLC (‘‘NOM’’) all have a sixty
                                             NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.                            Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the                day timeframe within which to dispute
                                             All submissions should refer to File                    Securities Exchange Act of 1934                       option invoices.3
                                             Number SR–NYSE–2016–64. This file                       (‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2                  The Exchange provides Members with
                                             number should be included on the                        notice is hereby given that on                        both daily and monthly fee reports and
                                             subject line if email is used. To help the              September 22, 2016, ISE Mercury, LLC                  thus believes Members should be aware
                                             Commission process and review your                      (‘‘ISE Mercury’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed               of any potential billing errors within
                                             comments more efficiently, please use                   with the Securities and Exchange                      sixty calendar days of receiving an
                                             only one method. The Commission will                    Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)                invoice. Requiring that Members
                                             post all comments on the Commission’s                   the proposed rule change as described                 dispute an invoice within this time
                                             Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/                  in Items I, II, and III, below, which Items           period will encourage them to promptly
                                             rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the                         have been prepared by the Exchange.                   review their invoices so that any
                                             submission, all subsequent                              The Commission is publishing this                     disputed charges can be addressed in a
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with NOTICES




                                             amendments, all written statements                      notice to solicit comments on the                     timely manner while the information
                                             with respect to the proposed rule                       proposed rule change from interested                  and data underlying those charges (e.g.
                                             change that are filed with the                          persons.                                              applicable fees and order information) is
                                                                                                                                                           still easily and readily available. This
                                               26 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).                              29 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
                                               27 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).                         1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                               3 See Phlx’s Pricing Schedule. See also NOM and
                                               28 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).                              2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.                                 BX Rules at Chapter XV, Section 7.



                                        VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:07 Oct 12, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00063   Fmt 4703   Sfmt 4703   E:\FR\FM\13OCN1.SGM   13OCN1



Document Created: 2016-10-13 00:53:45
Document Modified: 2016-10-13 00:53:45
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
FR Citation81 FR 70723 

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR