81 FR 71074 - Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 199 (October 14, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 199 (October 14, 2016)
| Page Range | 71074-71076 | |
| FR Document | 2016-24800 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 199 (Friday, October 14, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 71074-71076] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-24800] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-580-870] Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014- 2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain oil country tubular goods (OCTG) from the Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of review (POR) is July 18, 2014, through August 31, 2015. The Department preliminarily determines that the producers or exporters subject to the review, including the mandatory respondents NEXTEEL Co. Ltd. (NEXTEEL) and SeAH Steel Corporation (SeAH), made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective October 14, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Victoria Cho or Deborah Scott, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 5075 or (202) 482-2657, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On September 1, 2015, we published in the Federal Register a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the order.\1\ As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department has exercised its discretion to toll all administrative deadlines by four business days due to the closure of the Federal Government during Snowstorm Jonas.\2\ On February 12, 2016, we selected as mandatory respondents the two exporters or producers accounting for the largest volume of OCTG from Korea during the POR (i.e., in alphabetical order, NEXTEEL and SeAH).\3\ On May 31, 2016, we fully extended the preliminary results by 120 days.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 80 FR 52741 (September 1, 2015). \2\ See Memorandum to the Record from Ron Lorentzen, Acting A/S for Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During Snowstorm Jonas,'' dated January 27, 2016. \3\ See the Department's Memorandum entitled, ``Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea: Respondent Selection Memorandum,'' dated February 12, 2016 (Respondent Selection Memo). \4\ See the Memoradum to Christian Marsh entitled, ``Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea: Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated May 31, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is certain OCTG, which are hollow steel products of circular cross-section, including oil well casing and tubing, of iron (other than cast iron) or steel (both carbon and alloy), whether seamless or welded, regardless of end finish (e.g., whether or not plain end, threaded, or threaded and coupled) whether or not conforming to American Petroleum Institute (API) or non-API specifications, whether finished (including limited service OCTG products) or unfinished (including green tubes and limited service OCTG products), whether or not thread protectors are attached. The scope of the order also covers OCTG coupling stock. For a complete description of the scope of the order, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See the accompanying Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea, dated October 5, 2016 (Preliminary Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Methodology The Department is conducting this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export price and constructed export price are calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Normal value is calculated in accordance with section 773 of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is made available to the public via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be found at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed and electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the topics discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum is attached as Appendix 1 to this notice. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments Among the companies under review, certain companies properly filed statements reporting that they made no shipments of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR.\6\ Based on the certifications submitted by these companies and our analysis of information from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), we preliminarily determine that the following companies had no shipments during the POR: Hyundai Glovis, Hyundai Mobis, Hyundai RB, Kolon Global, POSCO Plantec, and Samsung C&T Corporation. For a full explanation of the Department's analysis, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Department finds that it is not appropriate to preliminarily rescind the review with respect to these companies but, rather, intends to complete the review with respect to these companies and issue appropriate instructions to CBP based on the final results of this review. [[Page 71075]] Rates for Non-Examined Companies --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Letter from Hyundai Steel Company to the Department (certifying that its affiliates Hyundai Glovis, Hyundai Mobis, and Hyundai RB had no exports, sales or entries of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR), dated December 9, 2015; Letter from Kolon Global to the Department, dated December 9, 2015; Letter from POSCO Plantec to the Department, dated December 9, 2015; and Letter from Samsung C&T Corporation to the Department, dated December 9, 2015. One other company, POSCO Processing & Service Co., Ltd., submitted a letter stating that it had no exports, sales or entries of subject merchandise to the United States during the POR. See Letter from POSCO Processing & Service Co., Ltd. to the Department, dated December 9, 2015. However, no company with this specific name was listed in the Initiation Notice. See Initiation Notice, 80 FR at 69195-6. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The statute and the Department's regulations do not address the establishment of a rate to be applied to companies not selected for examination when the Department limits its examination in an administrative review pursuant to section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, the Department looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, which provides instructions for calculating the all-others rate in a market economy investigation, for guidance when calculating the rate for companies which were not selected for individual examination in an administrative review. Under section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all- others rate is normally ``an amount equal to the weighted- average of the estimated weighted-average dumping margins established for exporters and producers individually investigated, excluding any zero or de minimis margins, and any margins determined entirely {on the basis of facts available{time} .'' In this review, we have preliminarily calculated weighted-average dumping margins for NEXTEEL and SeAH that are not zero, de minimis, or determined entirely on the basis of facts available. Accordingly, the Department preliminarily has assigned to the companies not individually examined (see Appendix 2 for a full list of these companies) a margin of 5.92 percent, which is the simple average \7\ of NEXTEEL's and SeAH's calculated weighted-average dumping margins. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ We calculated the all-others rate using a simple average of the dumping margins calculated for the mandatory respondents because complete publicly ranged sales data were not available. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Review The Department preliminarily determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter or producer dumping margin (percent) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ NEXTEEL Co., Ltd........................................ 8.04 SeAH Steel Corporation.................................. 3.80 Non-examined companies.................................. 5.92 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Public Comment on Allegations of a Particular Market Situation The Department intends to further consider allegations of a particular market situation in this proceeding. We invite parties to submit comments and arguments on these allegations no later than 14 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal comments will be due no later than five days after the deadline for submission of affirmative comments. Disclosure, Public Comment, and Opportunity To Request a Hearing We intend to disclose the calculations performed for these preliminary results of review to the parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c), interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the date for filing case briefs.\8\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this proceeding are encouraged to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue, (2) a brief summary of the argument, and (3) a table of authorities.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS. An electronically filed request must be received successfully in its entirety by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time within 30 days after the date of publication of this notice.\10\ Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues to be discussed. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case briefs. The Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, including the results of its analysis of the issues raised in any written briefs, not later than 120 days after the date of publication of this notice, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assessment Rates Upon completion of the administrative review, the Department shall determine, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. We intend to issue liquidation instructions to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. For any individually examined respondent whose weighted-average dumping margin is not zero or de minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent) in the final results of this review, we will calculate importer- specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales made to each importer and the total entered value of those sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an importer-specific ad valorem assessment rate is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties in accordance with 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). If a respodent's weighted-average dumping margin is zero or de minimis in the final results of review, we will instruct CBP not to assess duties on any of its entries in accordance with the Final Modification for Reviews, i.e., ``{w{time} here the weighted-average margin of dumping for the exporter is determined to be zero or de minimis, no antidumping duties will be assessed.'' \11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the Weighted- Average Dumping Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101, 8102 (February 14, 2012) (Final Modification for Reviews). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by NEXTEEL or SeAH for which the producer did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States or for any respondent for which we have a final determination of no shipments, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of this review for all shipments of OCTG from Korea entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the companies listed in the final results of review, will be equal to the weighted- average dumping margin established in the final results of this administrative review; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company- specific rate published from a completed segment for the most recent period; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original investigation but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established from a completed segment for the most recent period for the producer of the merchandise; (4) the [[Page 71076]] cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 5.24 percent,\13\ the all-others rate established in the less-than- fair-value investigation. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination, 81 FR 59603 (August 30, 2016). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notification to Importers This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. Notification to Interested Parties The Department is issuing and publishing these results in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act. Dated: October 5, 2016. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix 1 List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Background 3. Scope of Order 4. Preliminary Determination of No Shipments 5. Rates for Non-Examined Companies 6. Affiliation 7. Discussion of the Methodology 8. Currency Conversion 9. Recommendation Appendix 2 List of Companies Not Individually Examined A.R. Williams Materials AJU Besteel Co., Ltd. AK Steel BDP International Cantak Corporation Daewoo International Corporation Dong-A Steel Co., Ltd. Dong Yang Steel Pipe Dongbu Incheon Steel Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. Dongkuk S and C DSEC EEW Korea Erndtebruecker Eisenwerk and Company GS Global H K Steel Hansol Metal HG Tubulars Canada Ltd. Husteel Co., Ltd. Hyundai HYSCO \14\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \14\ On September 21, 2016, the Department published the final results of a changed circumstances review with respect to OCTG from Korea, finding that Hyundai Steel is the successor-in-interest to Hyundai HYSCO for purposes of determining antidumping duty cash deposits and liabilities. See Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Oil Country Tubular Goods From the Republic of Korea, 81 FR 64873 (September 21, 2016). Hyundai Steel Company is also known as Hyundai Steel Corporation and Hyundai Steel Co. Ltd. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hyundai HYSCO Co., Ltd. Hyundai Steel Company Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd. ILJIN Steel Corporation Kukbo Logix Kukje Steel Kumkang Industrial Co., Ltd. McJunkin Red Man Tubular NEXTEEL Q&T Nippon Arwwl and Aumikin Vuaan Korea Co., Ltd. Phocennee POSCO Processing and Acy Service Samson Sedae Entertech Steel Canada Steel Flower Steelpia Sung Jin TGS Pipe Toyota Tsusho Corporation UNI Global Logistics Yonghyun Base Materials [FR Doc. 2016-24800 Filed 10-13-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![71074 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 199 / Friday, October 14, 2016 / Notices
e. Comparisons to Normal Value administrative deadlines by four Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a
f. Determination of Comparison Method business days due to the closure of the public document and is made available
g. Results of Differential Pricing Analysis Federal Government during Snowstorm to the public via Enforcement and
h. Date of Sale
Jonas.2 On February 12, 2016, we Compliance’s Antidumping and
i. U.S. Price
j. Normal Value selected as mandatory respondents the Countervailing Duty Centralized
k. Factor Valuations two exporters or producers accounting Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
l. Currency Conversion for the largest volume of OCTG from ACCESS is available to registered users
5. Recommendation Korea during the POR (i.e., in at http://access.trade.gov, and is
[FR Doc. 2016–24797 Filed 10–13–16; 8:45 am] alphabetical order, NEXTEEL and available to all parties in the Central
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
SeAH).3 On May 31, 2016, we fully Records Unit, room B8024 of the main
extended the preliminary results by 120 Department of Commerce building. In
days.4 addition, a complete version of the
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Scope of the Order Preliminary Decision Memorandum can
International Trade Administration The merchandise covered by the order be found at http://
is certain OCTG, which are hollow steel enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
[A–580–870] The signed and electronic versions of
products of circular cross-section,
including oil well casing and tubing, of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods
iron (other than cast iron) or steel (both are identical in content. A list of the
From the Republic of Korea:
carbon and alloy), whether seamless or topics discussed in the Preliminary
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
welded, regardless of end finish (e.g., Decision Memorandum is attached as
Duty Administrative Review; 2014–
whether or not plain end, threaded, or Appendix 1 to this notice.
2015
threaded and coupled) whether or not
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, conforming to American Petroleum Preliminary Determination of No
International Trade Administration, Institute (API) or non-API Shipments
Department of Commerce. specifications, whether finished Among the companies under review,
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (including limited service OCTG certain companies properly filed
(the Department) is conducting an products) or unfinished (including statements reporting that they made no
administrative review of the green tubes and limited service OCTG shipments of subject merchandise to the
antidumping duty order on certain oil products), whether or not thread United States during the POR.6 Based
country tubular goods (OCTG) from the protectors are attached. The scope of the
on the certifications submitted by these
Republic of Korea (Korea). The period of order also covers OCTG coupling stock.
companies and our analysis of
review (POR) is July 18, 2014, through For a complete description of the scope
information from U.S. Customs and
August 31, 2015. The Department of the order, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.5 Border Protection (CBP), we
preliminarily determines that the preliminarily determine that the
producers or exporters subject to the Methodology following companies had no shipments
review, including the mandatory during the POR: Hyundai Glovis,
respondents NEXTEEL Co. Ltd. The Department is conducting this
administrative review in accordance Hyundai Mobis, Hyundai RB, Kolon
(NEXTEEL) and SeAH Steel Corporation
with section 751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act Global, POSCO Plantec, and Samsung
(SeAH), made sales of subject
of 1930, as amended (the Act). Export C&T Corporation.
merchandise at less than normal value.
We invite interested parties to comment price and constructed export price are For a full explanation of the
on these preliminary results. calculated in accordance with section Department’s analysis, see the
772 of the Act. Normal value is Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
DATES: Effective October 14, 2016.
calculated in accordance with section The Department finds that it is not
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 773 of the Act.
Victoria Cho or Deborah Scott, AD/CVD appropriate to preliminarily rescind the
For a full description of the review with respect to these companies
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and methodology underlying our
Compliance, International Trade but, rather, intends to complete the
conclusions, see the Preliminary
Administration, U.S. Department of review with respect to these companies
Decision Memorandum. The
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution and issue appropriate instructions to
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 2 See Memorandum to the Record from Ron
CBP based on the final results of this
telephone: (202) 482–5075 or (202) 482– Lorentzen, Acting A/S for Enforcement & review.
2657, respectively. Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of Administrative
Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure 6 See Letter from Hyundai Steel Company to the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: During Snowstorm Jonas,’’ dated January 27, 2016. Department (certifying that its affiliates Hyundai
3 See the Department’s Memorandum entitled,
Background Glovis, Hyundai Mobis, and Hyundai RB had no
‘‘Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of exports, sales or entries of subject merchandise to
On September 1, 2015, we published Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods from the the United States during the POR), dated December
in the Federal Register a notice of Republic of Korea: Respondent Selection 9, 2015; Letter from Kolon Global to the
Memorandum,’’ dated February 12, 2016 Department, dated December 9, 2015; Letter from
opportunity to request an administrative (Respondent Selection Memo). POSCO Plantec to the Department, dated December
review of the order.1 As explained in the 4 See the Memoradum to Christian Marsh
9, 2015; and Letter from Samsung C&T Corporation
memorandum from the Acting Assistant entitled, ‘‘Oil Country Tubular Goods from the to the Department, dated December 9, 2015. One
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Secretary for Enforcement and Republic of Korea: Extension of Time Limit for other company, POSCO Processing & Service Co.,
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Ltd., submitted a letter stating that it had no
Compliance, the Department has Administrative Review,’’ dated May 31, 2016. exports, sales or entries of subject merchandise to
exercised its discretion to toll all 5 See the accompanying Decision Memorandum the United States during the POR. See Letter from
for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty POSCO Processing & Service Co., Ltd. to the
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Administrative Review: Certain Oil Country Department, dated December 9, 2015. However, no
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity Tubular Goods from the Republic of Korea, dated company with this specific name was listed in the
To Request Administrative Review, 80 FR 52741 October 5, 2016 (Preliminary Decision Initiation Notice. See Initiation Notice, 80 FR at
(September 1, 2015). Memorandum). 69195–6.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:29 Oct 13, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM 14OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_71273/page/1.svg)
![71076 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 199 / Friday, October 14, 2016 / Notices
cash deposit rate for all other producers HG Tubulars Canada Ltd. lemon, and sand tiger sharks based on
or exporters will continue to be 5.24 Husteel Co., Ltd. recent information, as warranted;
percent,13 the all-others rate established Hyundai HYSCO 14 minimize to the extent practicable the
Hyundai HYSCO Co., Ltd.
in the less-than-fair-value investigation. adverse effects of fishing and non-
Hyundai Steel Company
These cash deposit requirements, when Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd. fishing activities on EFH; and identify
imposed, shall remain in effect until ILJIN Steel Corporation other actions to encourage the
further notice. Kukbo Logix conservation and enhancement of EFH.
Kukje Steel NMFS announces two public hearing
Notification to Importers Kumkang Industrial Co., Ltd. conference calls/webinars to allow
This notice serves as a preliminary McJunkin Red Man Tubular opportunities for interested members of
reminder to importers of their NEXTEEL Q&T the public from all geographic areas to
responsibility under 19 CFR Nippon Arwwl and Aumikin Vuaan Korea
submit verbal comments on Draft
Co., Ltd.
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate Phocennee Amendment 10.
regarding the reimbursement of POSCO Processing and Acy Service DATES: NMFS will host public hearing
antidumping duties prior to liquidation Samson conference calls/webinars on November
of the relevant entries during this POR. Sedae Entertech 10, 2016, from 3 to 5 p.m. EST and
Failure to comply with this requirement Steel Canada November 18, 2016, from 10 a.m. to 12
could result in the Department’s Steel Flower p.m. EST. Written comments on Draft
presumption that reimbursement of Steelpia Amendment 10 will be accepted until
antidumping duties occurred and the Sung Jin
TGS Pipe
December 22, 2016.
subsequent assessment of double ADDRESSES: Two public hearing
Toyota Tsusho Corporation
antidumping duties. UNI Global Logistics conference calls/webinars will be
Notification to Interested Parties Yonghyun Base Materials conducted. See SUPPLEMENTARY
[FR Doc. 2016–24800 Filed 10–13–16; 8:45 am] INFORMATION for information on how to
The Department is issuing and access the conference calls/webinars.
publishing these results in accordance BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
More information about Draft
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Amendment 10, including how to
Act. submit written comments, may be found
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Dated: October 5, 2016. at http://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/sfa/
Ronald K. Lorentzen, National Oceanic and Atmospheric hms/documents/fmp/am10/index.html.
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement Administration FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
and Compliance. Jennifer Cudney or Randy Blankinship
RIN 0648–XD990
Appendix 1 at (727) 824–5399.
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Essential Fish Habitat
Decision Memorandum
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Conservation and Management Act
1. Summary (Magnuson-Stevens Act) includes
2. Background Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
3. Scope of Order Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), provisions concerning the identification
4. Preliminary Determination of No Commerce. and conservation of EFH (16 U.S.C.
Shipments 1801 et seq.). EFH is defined at 50 CFR
ACTION: Notice of public hearings.
5. Rates for Non-Examined Companies 600.10 as ‘‘those waters and substrate
6. Affiliation SUMMARY: On September 8, 2016, NMFS necessary to fish for spawning,
7. Discussion of the Methodology breeding, feeding, or growth to
published a notice of availability of the
8. Currency Conversion maturity.’’ NMFS must identify and
9. Recommendation Draft Environmental Assessment for
Amendment 10 to the 2006 describe EFH, minimize to the extent
Appendix 2 Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory practicable the adverse effects of fishing
List of Companies Not Individually Species (HMS) Fishery Management on EFH, and identify actions to
Examined Plan (FMP). The purpose of this Draft encourage the conservation and
Amendment is to update Atlantic HMS enhancement of EFH (§ 600.815(a)).
A.R. Williams Materials
AJU Besteel Co., Ltd. Essential Fish Habitat (EFH) with recent Federal agencies that authorize, fund, or
AK Steel information following the EFH undertake actions that may adversely
BDP International delineation methodology established in affect EFH must consult with NMFS
Cantak Corporation Amendment 1 to the 2006 Consolidated (§ 600.920(a)), and NMFS must provide
Daewoo International Corporation Atlantic HMS FMP (Amendment 1); comments and EFH conservation
Dong-A Steel Co., Ltd. recommendations to Federal or state
update and consider new Habitat Areas
Dong Yang Steel Pipe agencies regarding any such actions
Dongbu Incheon Steel of Particular Concern (HAPCs) for
Dongbu Steel Co., Ltd. Atlantic bluefin tuna and sandbar, (§ 600.905).
Dongkuk S and C In addition to identifying and
DSEC 14 On September 21, 2016, the Department describing EFH for managed fish
EEW Korea published the final results of a changed species, a review of EFH must be
Erndtebruecker Eisenwerk and Company circumstances review with respect to OCTG from completed every 5 years, and EFH
rmajette on DSK2TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
GS Global Korea, finding that Hyundai Steel is the successor-
in-interest to Hyundai HYSCO for purposes of
provisions must be revised or amended,
H K Steel as warranted, based on the best
determining antidumping duty cash deposits and
Hansol Metal liabilities. See Notice of Final Results of available scientific information. NMFS
Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: announced the initiation of this review
13 See Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods From Oil Country Tubular Goods From the Republic of
the Republic of Korea: Notice of Court Decision Not Korea, 81 FR 64873 (September 21, 2016). Hyundai
and solicited information for
in Harmony With Final Determination, 81 FR 59603 Steel Company is also known as Hyundai Steel compilation for the draft review from
(August 30, 2016). Corporation and Hyundai Steel Co. Ltd. the public in a Federal Register notice
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:29 Oct 13, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\14OCN1.SGM 14OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_71273/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-10-14 00:00:42
Document Modified: 2016-10-14 00:00:42
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective October 14, 2016. | |
| Contact | Victoria Cho or Deborah Scott, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482- 5075 or (202) 482-2657, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 71074 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR