81 FR 71602 - Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 201 (October 18, 2016)
Federal Aviation Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 201 (October 18, 2016)
| Page Range | 71602-71605 | |
| FR Document | 2016-22837 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 18, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 71602-71605] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-22837] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA-2015-8132; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-127-AD; Amendment 39-18663; AD 2016-19-14] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Airbus Model A318 and A319 series airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, - 214, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and Model A321 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report of cracks found during maintenance inspections on certain lugs of the 10VU rack side fittings in the cockpit. This AD requires repetitive inspections for cracking of the lugs on the 10VU rack side fittings, and repair of any cracking. We are issuing this AD to prevent reading difficulties of flight-critical information displayed to the flightcrew during a critical phase of flight, such as an approach or takeoff, which could result in loss of airplane control at an altitude insufficient for recovery. DATES: This AD is effective November 22, 2016. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of November 22, 2016. ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule, contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email [email protected]; Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015- 8132. Examining the AD Docket You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015- 8132; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (telephone 800-647-5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1405; fax 425-227-1149. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Discussion We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on December 31, 2015 (80 FR 81792) (``the NPRM''). The NPRM was prompted by a report of cracks found during maintenance inspections on certain lugs of the 10VU rack side fittings in the cockpit. The NPRM proposed to require repetitive inspections for cracking of the lugs on the 10VU rack side fittings, and repair of any cracking. We are issuing this AD to prevent reading difficulties of flight-critical information displayed to the flightcrew during a critical phase of flight, such as an approach or takeoff, which could result in loss of airplane control at an altitude insufficient for recovery. The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness Directive 2015-0170, dated August 18, 2015 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for certain Airbus Model A318 and A319 series airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and Model A321 series airplanes. The MCAI states: [[Page 71603]] During an unscheduled maintenance operation on an A330 aeroplane, the 10VU rack was removed for access and cracks were discovered on 10VU rack side fittings on lugs 1, 3, and 4. As a similar design is installed on A320 family aeroplanes, a sampling review was done to determine the possible fleet impact. The result showed that several aeroplanes had cracked or broken 10VU rack side fittings. This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to a high vibration level on the primary flight- and navigation displays during critical flight phases (takeoff and landing), possibly creating reading difficulties for the crew. Prompted by these findings, Airbus developed mod 35869 to reinforce the affected rack fitting lugs. For in-service aeroplanes, Airbus published Service Bulletin (SB) A320-92-1087 to provide inspection and repair instructions. For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires repetitive detailed inspections (DET) of the affected 10VU rack fitting lugs and, depending on findings, accomplishment of a repair. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015- 8132. Comments We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment. Request To Clarify the Description of the Unsafe Condition Airbus asked that we revise the unsafe condition by stating that the NPRM is intended to prevent ``reading difficulties of flight- critical information,'' and not ``loss of flight-critical information.'' Airbus stated that this clarification would correspond with the language specified in EASA AD 2015-0170, dated August 18, 2015. We agree with the commenter's request, for the reason provided. We have clarified the unsafe condition in the SUMMARY and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Discussion sections in the preamble of this final rule and in paragraph (e) of the AD. Request To Extend Compliance Time Delta Airlines (DAL) asked that the compliance time specified in the NPRM be extended from 24 to 36 months. DAL stated that the subject cracking issue has been known for over five years; however, the FAA just recently took regulatory action. DAL added that there have been no in-service reports of issues related to safety of flight due to the cracking condition. DAL noted that the unsafe condition of vibration during a critical phase of flight is theoretical and not based on actual testing or experience. In light of this, DAL stated that the 24- month time limit is unwarranted, and should be extended to 36 months to allow more time so the inspection can be accomplished during a hangar visit. We do not agree with the commenter's request. In developing an appropriate compliance time for the actions specified in this AD, we considered the safety implications and normal maintenance schedules for the timely accomplishment of the specified actions. We have determined that the proposed 24-month compliance time will ensure an acceptable level of safety and allow the actions to be done during scheduled maintenance intervals for most affected operators. However, affected operators may request an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) for an extension of the compliance time under the provisions of paragraph (i)(1) of this AD by submitting data and analysis substantiating that the change would provide an acceptable level of safety. We have not changed this AD in this regard. Request To Remove Reporting Requirement DAL asked that the proposed mandatory reporting requirement in paragraph (h) of the proposed AD be removed. DAL understands that Airbus wants to gather necessary in-service information; however, the airworthiness of the airplane does not depend on mandatory reporting. DAL stated that the airplane would be airworthy and public safety would be maintained without the mandatory reporting requirement. DAL added that requiring reporting places an unfair burden on operators of Airbus airplanes compared to operators of airplanes produced by other manufacturers, particularly when there are no findings, because reporting is mandated for the benefit of the original equipment manufacturer. DAL concluded that the reporting should not be mandated through this regulatory action. We do not agree with the commenter's request to remove the reporting requirement in paragraph (h) of this AD. We disagree that public safety would be maintained without the mandatory reporting requirement. Reporting is necessary for the airframe manufacturer to determine the extent of the cracking of the lugs on the 10VU rack side fittings, and to ascertain any necessary follow-up actions. Therefore, we have not changed this AD in this regard. Request To Clarify Reporting Requirements DAL asked for clarification of the format necessary to report the inspection results specified in paragraph (h) of the proposed AD. DAL asked if the reporting form located in the back of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014, must be used or if the report can be submitted using another format. While we recommend that operators use the form in Figure A-FRAAA-- Sheet 02, titled ``Inspection Report,'' of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014, this AD does not require use of that form. We have changed paragraph (h) of this AD to clarify our intent. DAL also noted that it disagrees with having to determine and report the supplemental type certificate (STC) status for equipment attached to the 10VU rack, as specified in Figure A-FRAAA--Sheet 02, titled ``Inspection Report,'' of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014. DAL stated that STC equipment should be addressed in a separate regulatory action. We agree with the comment. As previously indicated, the referenced form is not specifically required by this AD, and we have changed paragraph (h) of this AD to clarify our intent. Request for Clarification on Returning Damaged Parts DAL and United Airlines (UAL) asked for clarification on returning damaged parts to Airbus. DAL stated that if the reporting form must be used, it disagrees with sending all damaged parts to Airbus. UAL stated that the NPRM proposes requiring reporting inspection findings to Airbus, and Figure A-FRAAA--Sheet 02, titled ``Inspection Report'' of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014, specifies that damaged lugs are to be sent to Airbus for investigation. UAL noted that it will try to deliver damaged parts, but added that this should not be an AD requirement since parts shipment will increase cost and the operator cannot guarantee delivery. We agree that clarification is necessary. Although the note contained in Figure A-FRAAA--Sheet 02, titled ``Inspection Report,'' of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014, specifies ``If lugs have been replaced the removed part should be sent to Airbus for investigation,'' this AD does not include that requirement. We have included this [[Page 71604]] exception in the reporting requirement in paragraph (h) of this AD. Request To Use a Certain Drawing UAL asked that we approve using the current version of the Airbus repair drawing, as called out in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014. UAL noted that this repair drawing is the latest version and may be revised without revision of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014. For clarification, we agree that the current version of the repair drawing can be used. We have not changed this AD in this regard. Request To Change Costs of Compliance Section DAL asked that we change the repair estimate in the `Costs of Compliance' section of the NPRM, as specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014. DAL stated that the service information does not provide the cost of the parts, and Airbus does have the price of each part listed in the COMPA01 components. DAL added that the parts cost is $9,140 per airplane to accomplish the repair work. DAL asked that this cost be included in the cost of the repair, for a total of $16,280 per airplane. We agree with the commenter's request, for the reason provided. We have changed the repair estimate in the `Costs of Compliance' section of this final rule accordingly. Conclusion We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM. We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD. Related Service Information Under 1 CFR part 51 We reviewed Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014. The service information describes procedures for repetitive inspections for cracking of the lugs on the 10VU rack side fittings, and repair of any cracking. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section. Costs of Compliance We estimate that this AD affects 959 airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it takes about 2 work-hours per product to comply with the basic requirements of this AD, and 1 work-hour per product to report inspection findings. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S. operators to be $244,545, or $255 per product. In addition, we estimate that any necessary repair takes about 84 work-hours and require parts costing $9,140, for a cost of $16,280 per product. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these actions. Paperwork Reduction Act A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control number for the collection of information required by this AD is 2120- 0056. The paperwork cost associated with this AD has been detailed in the Costs of Compliance section of this document and includes time for reviewing instructions, as well as completing and reviewing the collection of information. Therefore, all reporting associated with this AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA at 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, ATTN: Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200. Authority for This Rulemaking Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in ``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. Regulatory Findings We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: 1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; 2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and 4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. Sec. 39.13 [Amended] 0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): 2016-19-14 Airbus: Amendment 39-18663; Docket No. FAA-2015-8132; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-127-AD. (a) Effective Date This AD is effective November 22, 2016. (b) Affected ADs None. (c) Applicability This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(4) of this AD, certificated in any category; [[Page 71605]] except airplanes on which Airbus Modification 35869 has been embodied in production. (1) Airbus Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -122 airplanes. (2) Airbus Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133 airplanes. (3) Airbus Model A320-211, -212, -214, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes. (4) Airbus Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes. (d) Subject Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 25, Equipment/ Furnishings. (e) Reason This AD was prompted by a report of cracks found during maintenance inspections on certain lugs of the 10VU rack side fittings in the cockpit. We are issuing this AD to prevent reading difficulties of flight-critical information displayed to the flightcrew during a critical phase of flight, such as an approach or takeoff, which could result in loss of airplane control at an altitude insufficient for recovery. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. (g) Repetitive Inspections and Repair At the later of the times specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD: Do a detailed inspection for cracking of the lugs on the 10VU rack side fittings in the cockpit, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92- 1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014. If any crack is found, before further flight, repair in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 20,000 flight cycles or 40,000 flight hours, whichever occurs first. Repair of the 10VU rack lugs does not terminate the repetitive inspections required by this paragraph. (1) Before the accumulation of 30,000 total flight cycles or 60,000 total flight hours, whichever occurs first since the airplane's first flight. (2) Within 24 months after the effective date of this AD. (h) Reporting Requirement Submit a report of any findings (positive and negative) of any inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD to Airbus Service Bulletin Reporting Online Application on Airbus World (https://w3.airbus.com/), at the applicable time specified in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD. Where Figure A-FRAAA--Sheet 02, titled ``Inspection Report,'' of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014, specifies sending removed lugs to Airbus for investigation, this AD does not include that requirement. The form contained in Figure A-FRAAA--Sheet 02, titled ``Inspection Report,'' of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014, may be used to meet this reporting requirement. (1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of this AD: Submit the report within 90 days after the inspection. (2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this AD: Submit the report within 90 days after the effective date of this AD. (i) Other FAA AD Provisions The following provisions also apply to this AD: (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057- 3356; telephone 425-227-1405; fax 425-227-1149. Information may be emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature. (3) Reporting Requirements: A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the collection of information. All responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200. (4) Required for Compliance (RC): If any service information contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC require approval of an AMOC. (j) Related Information Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness Directive 2015- 0170, dated August 18, 2015, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA- 2015-8132. (k) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-92-1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014. (ii) Reserved. (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email [email protected]; Internet http://www.airbus.com. (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 14, 2016. Michael Kaszycki, Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2016-22837 Filed 10-17-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
![71602 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 18, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
(r) Material Incorporated by Reference Issued in Renton, Washington, on www.regulations.gov by searching for
(1) The Director of the Federal Register September 19, 2016. and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
approved the incorporation by reference Dionne Palermo, 8132.
(IBR) of the service information listed in this Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
Examining the AD Docket
part 51. [FR Doc. 2016–23261 Filed 10–17–16; 8:45 am] You may examine the AD docket on
(2) You must use this service information BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
the Internet at http://
as applicable to do the actions required by www.regulations.gov by searching for
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise. and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
(3) The following service information was 8132; or in person at the Docket
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
approved for IBR on November 22, 2016. Management Facility between 9 a.m.
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–0116, and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
Federal Aviation Administration
Revision 07, dated September 19, 2011,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
including Appendixes A and B. Only the first
page of Appendixes A and B of this 14 CFR Part 39 contains this AD, the regulatory
document are identified as appendixes. evaluation, any comments received, and
[Docket No. FAA–2015–8132; Directorate
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6005, Identifier 2015–NM–127–AD; Amendment other information. The street address for
Revision 06, dated November 14, 2013. 39–18663; AD 2016–19–14] the Docket Office (telephone 800–647–
(4) The following service information was 5527) is Docket Management Facility,
approved for IBR on November 17, 1995 (60 RIN 2120–AA64 U.S. Department of Transportation,
FR 53847, October 18, 1995). Docket Operations, M–30, West
(i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–116, Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Revision 6, dated July 16, 1993, which Airplanes 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
contains the following effective pages: Pages Washington, DC 20590.
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
1 through 11 of this document are identified
Administration (FAA), Department of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
as Revision 6, dated July 16, 1993.
(ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–128, Transportation (DOT). Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
Revision 3, dated January 26, 1990, which ACTION: Final rule. International Branch, ANM–116,
contains the following effective pages: Page Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1 is identified as Revision 3, dated January SUMMARY: We are adopting a new 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
26, 1990; pages 2 through 5 are identified as airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 98057–3356; telephone 425–227–1405;
Revision 1, dated February 7, 1986; and Airbus Model A318 and A319 series fax 425–227–1149.
pages 6 through 14 are identified as the airplanes; Model A320–211, –212, –214, SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
original issue, dated August 27, 1983. –231, –232, and –233 airplanes; and
(iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–141, Model A321 series airplanes. This AD Discussion
Revision 7, dated July 16, 1993, which was prompted by a report of cracks We issued a notice of proposed
contains the following effective pages: Pages found during maintenance inspections rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
1 through 24 of this document are identified part 39 by adding an AD that would
on certain lugs of the 10VU rack side
as Revision 7, dated July 16, 1993. apply to certain Airbus Model A318,
(iv) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–
fittings in the cockpit. This AD requires
repetitive inspections for cracking of the A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes.
6005, Revision 2, dated December 16, 1993,
which contains the following effective pages: lugs on the 10VU rack side fittings, and The NPRM published in the Federal
Pages 1 through 4 are identified as Revision repair of any cracking. We are issuing Register on December 31, 2015 (80 FR
2, dated December 16, 1993; pages 5 through this AD to prevent reading difficulties of 81792) (‘‘the NPRM’’). The NPRM was
7 and 9 are identified as Revision 1, dated flight-critical information displayed to prompted by a report of cracks found
February 26, 1993; and page 8 is identified the flightcrew during a critical phase of during maintenance inspections on
as the original issue, dated August 13, 1986. flight, such as an approach or takeoff, certain lugs of the 10VU rack side
(v) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–57–6006, which could result in loss of airplane fittings in the cockpit. The NPRM
Revision 4, dated July 25, 1994, which control at an altitude insufficient for proposed to require repetitive
contains the following effective pages: Pages recovery. inspections for cracking of the lugs on
1, 2, 5, and 7 are identified as Revision 4, the 10VU rack side fittings, and repair
dated July 25, 1994; and pages 3, 4, 6, and DATES: This AD is effective November
of any cracking. We are issuing this AD
8 through 20 are identified as Revision 3, 22, 2016. to prevent reading difficulties of flight-
dated December 16, 1993. The Director of the Federal Register critical information displayed to the
(5) For service information identified in approved the incorporation by reference flightcrew during a critical phase of
this AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness of a certain publication listed in this AD flight, such as an approach or takeoff,
Office—EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice as of November 22, 2016.
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; which could result in loss of airplane
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 ADDRESSES: For service information control at an altitude insufficient for
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@ identified in this final rule, contact recovery.
airbus.com; Internet http://www.airbus.com. Airbus, Airworthiness Office—EIAS, 1 The European Aviation Safety Agency
(6) You may view this service information Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 (EASA), which is the Technical Agent
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 for the Member States of the European
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
information on the availability of this account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; Directive 2015–0170, dated August 18,
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. Internet http://www.airbus.com. You 2015 (referred to after this as the
(7) You may view this service information may view this referenced service Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
information at the FAA, Transport Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
Administration (NARA). For information on Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue an unsafe condition for certain Airbus
the availability of this material at NARA, call SW., Renton, WA. For information on Model A318 and A319 series airplanes;
202–741–6030, or go to: http:// the availability of this material at the Model A320–211, –212, –214, –231,
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr- FAA, call 425–227–1221. It is also –232, and –233 airplanes; and Model
locations.html. available on the Internet at http:// A321 series airplanes. The MCAI states:
VerDate Sep<11>2014 12:31 Oct 17, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\18OCR1.SGM 18OCR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_71803/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 18, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 71603
During an unscheduled maintenance critical phase of flight is theoretical and Request To Clarify Reporting
operation on an A330 aeroplane, the 10VU not based on actual testing or Requirements
rack was removed for access and cracks were experience. In light of this, DAL stated
discovered on 10VU rack side fittings on lugs DAL asked for clarification of the
that the 24-month time limit is format necessary to report the
1, 3, and 4. As a similar design is installed
on A320 family aeroplanes, a sampling unwarranted, and should be extended to inspection results specified in
review was done to determine the possible 36 months to allow more time so the paragraph (h) of the proposed AD. DAL
fleet impact. The result showed that several inspection can be accomplished during asked if the reporting form located in
aeroplanes had cracked or broken 10VU rack a hangar visit. the back of Airbus Service Bulletin
side fittings. We do not agree with the commenter’s A320–92–1087, Revision 02, dated
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to a high vibration level
request. In developing an appropriate November 25, 2014, must be used or if
on the primary flight- and navigation compliance time for the actions the report can be submitted using
displays during critical flight phases (takeoff specified in this AD, we considered the another format.
and landing), possibly creating reading safety implications and normal While we recommend that operators
difficulties for the crew. maintenance schedules for the timely use the form in Figure A–FRAAA—
Prompted by these findings, Airbus accomplishment of the specified Sheet 02, titled ‘‘Inspection Report,’’ of
developed mod 35869 to reinforce the actions. We have determined that the Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1087,
affected rack fitting lugs. For in-service proposed 24-month compliance time Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014,
aeroplanes, Airbus published Service this AD does not require use of that
Bulletin (SB) A320–92–1087 to provide
will ensure an acceptable level of safety
and allow the actions to be done during form. We have changed paragraph (h) of
inspection and repair instructions.
For the reasons described above, this scheduled maintenance intervals for this AD to clarify our intent.
[EASA] AD requires repetitive detailed most affected operators. However, DAL also noted that it disagrees with
inspections (DET) of the affected 10VU rack affected operators may request an having to determine and report the
fitting lugs and, depending on findings, alternative method of compliance supplemental type certificate (STC)
accomplishment of a repair. (AMOC) for an extension of the status for equipment attached to the
You may examine the MCAI in the AD compliance time under the provisions of 10VU rack, as specified in Figure A–
docket on the Internet at http:// paragraph (i)(1) of this AD by submitting FRAAA—Sheet 02, titled ‘‘Inspection
www.regulations.gov by searching for data and analysis substantiating that the Report,’’ of Airbus Service Bulletin
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015– change would provide an acceptable A320–92–1087, Revision 02, dated
8132. level of safety. We have not changed November 25, 2014. DAL stated that
this AD in this regard. STC equipment should be addressed in
Comments a separate regulatory action.
We gave the public the opportunity to Request To Remove Reporting We agree with the comment. As
participate in developing this AD. The Requirement previously indicated, the referenced
following presents the comments form is not specifically required by this
DAL asked that the proposed AD, and we have changed paragraph (h)
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s mandatory reporting requirement in
response to each comment. of this AD to clarify our intent.
paragraph (h) of the proposed AD be
Request To Clarify the Description of removed. DAL understands that Airbus Request for Clarification on Returning
the Unsafe Condition wants to gather necessary in-service Damaged Parts
information; however, the airworthiness DAL and United Airlines (UAL) asked
Airbus asked that we revise the unsafe
of the airplane does not depend on for clarification on returning damaged
condition by stating that the NPRM is
mandatory reporting. DAL stated that parts to Airbus. DAL stated that if the
intended to prevent ‘‘reading difficulties
the airplane would be airworthy and reporting form must be used, it
of flight-critical information,’’ and not
public safety would be maintained disagrees with sending all damaged
‘‘loss of flight-critical information.’’
without the mandatory reporting parts to Airbus. UAL stated that the
Airbus stated that this clarification
requirement. DAL added that requiring NPRM proposes requiring reporting
would correspond with the language
reporting places an unfair burden on inspection findings to Airbus, and
specified in EASA AD 2015–0170, dated
operators of Airbus airplanes compared Figure A–FRAAA—Sheet 02, titled
August 18, 2015.
to operators of airplanes produced by ‘‘Inspection Report’’ of Airbus Service
We agree with the commenter’s
other manufacturers, particularly when Bulletin A320–92–1087, Revision 02,
request, for the reason provided. We
there are no findings, because reporting dated November 25, 2014, specifies that
have clarified the unsafe condition in
is mandated for the benefit of the damaged lugs are to be sent to Airbus
the SUMMARY and SUPPLEMENTARY
original equipment manufacturer. DAL for investigation. UAL noted that it will
INFORMATION Discussion sections in the
concluded that the reporting should not try to deliver damaged parts, but added
preamble of this final rule and in
be mandated through this regulatory that this should not be an AD
paragraph (e) of the AD.
action. requirement since parts shipment will
Request To Extend Compliance Time We do not agree with the commenter’s increase cost and the operator cannot
Delta Airlines (DAL) asked that the request to remove the reporting guarantee delivery.
compliance time specified in the NPRM requirement in paragraph (h) of this AD. We agree that clarification is
be extended from 24 to 36 months. DAL We disagree that public safety would be necessary. Although the note contained
stated that the subject cracking issue has maintained without the mandatory in Figure A–FRAAA—Sheet 02, titled
been known for over five years; reporting requirement. Reporting is ‘‘Inspection Report,’’ of Airbus Service
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
however, the FAA just recently took necessary for the airframe manufacturer Bulletin A320–92–1087, Revision 02,
regulatory action. DAL added that there to determine the extent of the cracking dated November 25, 2014, specifies ‘‘If
have been no in-service reports of issues of the lugs on the 10VU rack side lugs have been replaced the removed
related to safety of flight due to the fittings, and to ascertain any necessary part should be sent to Airbus for
cracking condition. DAL noted that the follow-up actions. Therefore, we have investigation,’’ this AD does not include
unsafe condition of vibration during a not changed this AD in this regard. that requirement. We have included this
VerDate Sep<11>2014 12:31 Oct 17, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\18OCR1.SGM 18OCR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_71803/page/2.svg)
![71604 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 18, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
exception in the reporting requirement repair of any cracking. This service for practices, methods, and procedures
in paragraph (h) of this AD. information is reasonably available the Administrator finds necessary for
because the interested parties have safety in air commerce. This regulation
Request To Use a Certain Drawing
access to it through their normal course is within the scope of that authority
UAL asked that we approve using the of business or by the means identified because it addresses an unsafe condition
current version of the Airbus repair in the ADDRESSES section. that is likely to exist or develop on
drawing, as called out in Airbus Service products identified in this rulemaking
Bulletin A320–92–1087, Revision 02, Costs of Compliance
action.
dated November 25, 2014. UAL noted We estimate that this AD affects 959
that this repair drawing is the latest airplanes of U.S. registry. Regulatory Findings
version and may be revised without We also estimate that it takes about 2 We determined that this AD will not
revision of Airbus Service Bulletin work-hours per product to comply with have federalism implications under
A320–92–1087, Revision 02, dated the basic requirements of this AD, and Executive Order 13132. This AD will
November 25, 2014. 1 work-hour per product to report not have a substantial direct effect on
For clarification, we agree that the inspection findings. The average labor the States, on the relationship between
current version of the repair drawing rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on the national government and the States,
can be used. We have not changed this these figures, we estimate the cost of or on the distribution of power and
AD in this regard. this AD on U.S. operators to be responsibilities among the various
$244,545, or $255 per product. levels of government.
Request To Change Costs of Compliance In addition, we estimate that any
Section For the reasons discussed above, I
necessary repair takes about 84 work- certify that this AD:
DAL asked that we change the repair hours and require parts costing $9,140, 1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
estimate in the ‘Costs of Compliance’ for a cost of $16,280 per product. We action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
section of the NPRM, as specified in have no way of determining the number 2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1087, of aircraft that might need these actions. DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014. (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
Paperwork Reduction Act
DAL stated that the service information 3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
does not provide the cost of the parts, A federal agency may not conduct or Alaska; and
and Airbus does have the price of each sponsor, and a person is not required to 4. Will not have a significant
part listed in the COMPA01 respond to, nor shall a person be subject economic impact, positive or negative,
components. DAL added that the parts to penalty for failure to comply with a on a substantial number of small entities
cost is $9,140 per airplane to collection of information subject to the under the criteria of the Regulatory
accomplish the repair work. DAL asked requirements of the Paperwork Flexibility Act.
that this cost be included in the cost of Reduction Act unless that collection of
the repair, for a total of $16,280 per information displays a current valid List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
airplane. OMB control number. The control Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
We agree with the commenter’s number for the collection of information safety, Incorporation by reference,
request, for the reason provided. We required by this AD is 2120–0056. The Safety.
have changed the repair estimate in the paperwork cost associated with this AD
‘Costs of Compliance’ section of this has been detailed in the Costs of Adoption of the Amendment
final rule accordingly. Compliance section of this document Accordingly, under the authority
and includes time for reviewing delegated to me by the Administrator,
Conclusion instructions, as well as completing and the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
We reviewed the relevant data, reviewing the collection of information. follows:
considered the comments received, and Therefore, all reporting associated with
determined that air safety and the this AD is mandatory. Comments PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
public interest require adopting this AD concerning the accuracy of this burden DIRECTIVES
with the changes described previously and suggestions for reducing the burden
and minor editorial changes. We have should be directed to the FAA at 800 ■ 1. The authority citation for part 39
determined that these minor changes: Independence Ave. SW., Washington, continues to read as follows:
• Are consistent with the intent that DC 20591, ATTN: Information Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
was proposed in the NPRM for Collection Clearance Officer, AES–200.
correcting the unsafe condition; and § 39.13 [Amended]
• Do not add any additional burden Authority for This Rulemaking
■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
upon the public than was already Title 49 of the United States Code the following new airworthiness
proposed in the NPRM. specifies the FAA’s authority to issue directive (AD):
We also determined that these rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
2016–19–14 Airbus: Amendment 39–18663;
changes will not increase the economic section 106, describes the authority of Docket No. FAA–2015–8132; Directorate
burden on any operator or increase the the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: Identifier 2015–NM–127–AD.
scope of this AD. Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s (a) Effective Date
Related Service Information Under 1 authority. This AD is effective November 22, 2016.
CFR part 51 We are issuing this rulemaking under (b) Affected ADs
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
We reviewed Airbus Service Bulletin the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
A320–92–1087, Revision 02, dated Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: None.
November 25, 2014. The service General requirements.’’ Under that (c) Applicability
information describes procedures for section, Congress charges the FAA with This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes
repetitive inspections for cracking of the promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in identified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(4)
lugs on the 10VU rack side fittings, and air commerce by prescribing regulations of this AD, certificated in any category;
VerDate Sep<11>2014 12:31 Oct 17, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\18OCR1.SGM 18OCR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_71803/page/3.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 201 / Tuesday, October 18, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 71605
except airplanes on which Airbus November 25, 2014, may be used to meet this procedures and tests that are not identified
Modification 35869 has been embodied in reporting requirement. as RC may be deviated from using accepted
production. (1) If the inspection was done on or after methods in accordance with the operator’s
(1) Airbus Model A318–111, –112, –121, the effective date of this AD: Submit the maintenance or inspection program without
and –122 airplanes. report within 90 days after the inspection. obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
(2) Airbus Model A319–111, –112, –113, (2) If the inspection was done before the the procedures and tests identified as RC can
–114, –115, –131, –132, and –133 airplanes. effective date of this AD: Submit the report be done and the airplane can be put back in
(3) Airbus Model A320–211, –212, –214, within 90 days after the effective date of this an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
–231, –232, and –233 airplanes. AD. changes to procedures or tests identified as
(4) Airbus Model A321–111, –112, –131, RC require approval of an AMOC.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
–211, –212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes. (j) Related Information
The following provisions also apply to this
(d) Subject AD: Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Air Transport Association (ATA) of (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance Airworthiness Information (MCAI) European
America Code 25, Equipment/Furnishings. (AMOCs): The Manager, International Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane Airworthiness Directive 2015–0170, dated
(e) Reason Directorate, FAA, has the authority to August 18, 2015, for related information.
This AD was prompted by a report of approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested This MCAI may be found in the AD docket
cracks found during maintenance inspections using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
on certain lugs of the 10VU rack side fittings In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your by searching for and locating Docket No.
in the cockpit. We are issuing this AD to request to your principal inspector or local FAA–2015–8132.
prevent reading difficulties of flight-critical Flight Standards District Office, as (k) Material Incorporated by Reference
information displayed to the flightcrew appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: (1) The Director of the Federal Register
during a critical phase of flight, such as an
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, approved the incorporation by reference
approach or takeoff, which could result in
International Branch, ANM–116, Transport (IBR) of the service information listed in this
loss of airplane control at an altitude
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
insufficient for recovery. part 51.
Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356;
(f) Compliance telephone 425–227–1405; fax 425–227–1149. (2) You must use this service information
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116- as applicable to do the actions required by
Comply with this AD within the
AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
compliance times specified, unless already
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320–92–1087,
done.
principal inspector, or lacking a principal Revision 02, dated November 25, 2014.
(g) Repetitive Inspections and Repair inspector, the manager of the local flight (ii) Reserved.
standards district office/certificate holding (3) For service information identified in
At the later of the times specified in
district office. this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD: Do a
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
detailed inspection for cracking of the lugs
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
on the 10VU rack side fittings in the cockpit,
actions from a manufacturer, the action must telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
in accordance with the Accomplishment
be accomplished using a method approved 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
by the Manager, International Branch, ANM– airbus.com; Internet http://www.airbus.com.
92–1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, (4) You may view this service information
2014. If any crack is found, before further 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate,
flight, repair in accordance with the the European Aviation Safety Agency
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus (EASA); or Airbus’s EASA Design
information on the availability of this
Service Bulletin A320–92–1087, Revision 02, Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
dated November 25, 2014. Repeat the the DOA, the approval must include the
(5) You may view this service information
inspection thereafter at intervals not to DOA-authorized signature.
that is incorporated by reference at the
exceed 20,000 flight cycles or 40,000 flight (3) Reporting Requirements: A federal
National Archives and Records
hours, whichever occurs first. Repair of the agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
Administration (NARA). For information on
10VU rack lugs does not terminate the person is not required to respond to, nor
the availability of this material at NARA, call
repetitive inspections required by this shall a person be subject to a penalty for 202–741–6030, or go to: http://
paragraph. failure to comply with a collection of www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-
(1) Before the accumulation of 30,000 total information subject to the requirements of locations.html.
flight cycles or 60,000 total flight hours, the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
whichever occurs first since the airplane’s collection of information displays a current Issued in Renton, Washington, on
first flight. valid OMB Control Number. The OMB September 14, 2016.
(2) Within 24 months after the effective Control Number for this information Michael Kaszycki,
date of this AD. collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
this collection of information is estimated to Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
(h) Reporting Requirement be approximately 5 minutes per response,
[FR Doc. 2016–22837 Filed 10–17–16; 8:45 am]
Submit a report of any findings (positive including the time for reviewing instructions,
and negative) of any inspection required by completing and reviewing the collection of BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
paragraph (g) of this AD to Airbus Service information. All responses to this collection
Bulletin Reporting Online Application on of information are mandatory. Comments
Airbus World (https://w3.airbus.com/), at the concerning the accuracy of this burden and COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
applicable time specified in paragraph (h)(1) suggestions for reducing the burden should COMMISSION
or (h)(2) of this AD. Where Figure A– be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence
FRAAA—Sheet 02, titled ‘‘Inspection Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: 17 CFR Part 1
Report,’’ of Airbus Service Bulletin A320– Information Collection Clearance Officer,
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
92–1087, Revision 02, dated November 25, AES–200. Order Establishing De Minimis
2014, specifies sending removed lugs to (4) Required for Compliance (RC): If any Threshold Phase-In Termination Date
Airbus for investigation, this AD does not service information contains procedures or
include that requirement. The form tests that are identified as RC, those AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading
contained in Figure A–FRAAA—Sheet 02, procedures and tests must be done to comply Commission.
titled ‘‘Inspection Report,’’ of Airbus Service with this AD; any procedures or tests that are ACTION: Order.
Bulletin A320–92–1087, Revision 02, dated not identified as RC are recommended. Those
VerDate Sep<11>2014 12:31 Oct 17, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\18OCR1.SGM 18OCR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_71803/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2016-10-17 23:52:14
Document Modified: 2016-10-17 23:52:14
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This AD is effective November 22, 2016. | |
| Contact | Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone 425-227-1405; fax 425-227-1149. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 71602 | |
| RIN Number | 2120-AA64 | |
| CFR Associated | Air Transportation; Aircraft; Aviation Safety; Incorporation by Reference and Safety |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR