81 FR 7256 - Safety Zone; Cooper River Bridge Run, Cooper River, and Town Creek Reaches, Charleston, SC
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 28 (February 11, 2016)
Coast Guard
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 28 (February 11, 2016)
| Page Range | 7256-7259 | |
| FR Document | 2016-02621 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 28 (Thursday, February 11, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 7256-7259] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-02621] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 100 [Docket Number USCG-2016-0022] RIN 1625-AA08 Safety Zone; Cooper River Bridge Run, Cooper River, and Town Creek Reaches, Charleston, SC AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on the waters of [[Page 7257]] Cooper River and Town Creek Reaches in Charleston, South Carolina during the Cooper River Bridge Run on April 2, 2016 from 7:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. The Cooper River Bridge Run is a 10-K run across the Arthur Ravenel Bridge. The safety zone is necessary for the safety of the runners and the general public during this event. This proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative. DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before February 26, 2016. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG- 2016-0022 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant John Downing, Sector Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843) 740-3184, email [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security E.O. Executive order FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking Pub. L. Public Law Sec. Section U.S.C. United States Code COTP Captain of the Port II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis The legal basis for this proposed rule is the Coast Guard's authority to establish regulated safety zones and other limited access areas: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170. The purpose of the rule is to ensure the safety of the runners, and the general public during the scheduled event. III. Discussion of Proposed Rule The Coast Guard proposes to establish a safety zone on the waters of the Cooper River and Town Creek Reaches in Charleston, South Carolina during the Cooper River Bridge Run. The race is scheduled to take place from 7:30 a.m.10:30 a.m. April 2, 2016 Approximately 40,000 runners are anticipated to participate in the race. Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the proposed safety zone may contact the Captain of the Port Charleston by telephone at (843) 740-7050, or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization. If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the proposed safety zone is granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative. The Coast Guard will provide notice of the safety zone by Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated representatives. IV. Regulatory Analyses We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and executive orders. A. Regulatory Planning and Review E.O.s 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. E.O.13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under E.O. 12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. The economic impact of this rule is not significant for the following reasons: (1) The safety zone will only be enforced for a total of three hours; (2) although persons and vessels may not enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the safety zone without authorization from the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative, they may operate in the surrounding area during the enforcement period; and (3) the Coast Guard will provide advance notification of the safety zone to the local maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, (5 U.S.C. 601-612), as amended requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on ``small entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for- profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. We have considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. This rule may affect the following entities, some of which may be small entities: the owner or operators of vessels intending to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area during the enforcement period. For the reasons discussed in Regulatory Planning and Review section above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. If you think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically affect it. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501- 3520). [[Page 7258]] D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under E.O. 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in E.O. 13132. Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under E.O. 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves safety zone prohibiting vessel traffic from a limited area surrounding the Cooper River Bridge on the waters of the Cooper River and Town Creek Reaches for a 3 hour period. This rule is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. We seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places, or vessels. V. Public Participation and Request for Comments We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking, and will consider all comments and material received during the comment period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or recommendation. We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate instructions. We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 15086). Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket, and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a final rule is published. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS 0 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191, 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04- 1, 6.04-6, 160.5; and Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170. 0 2. Add a temporary Sec. 165.35T07-0022 to read as follows: Sec. 165.35T07-0022 Safety Zone; Cooper River Bridge Run, Charleston SC. (a) Location. All waters of the Cooper River, and Town Creek Reaches encompassed within the following points: (1) 32[deg]48'32'' N./079[deg]56'08'' W., (2) 32[deg]48'20'' N./079[deg]54'20'' W., (3) 32[deg]47'20'' N./079[deg]54'29'' W., (4) 32[deg]47'20'' N./079[deg]55'28'' W. (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast Guard Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers, and other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, state, and local officers designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Charleston in the enforcement of the regulated areas. (c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels are prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative. (2) Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, or remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the Port Charleston by telephone at 843-740-7050, or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization. If authorization to enter, transit through, or remain within the regulated area is granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative. (3) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by Local Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated representatives. (d) Enforcement Period. This proposed rule will be enforced from 7:30 a.m. until 10:30 a.m. on April 2, 2016. [[Page 7259]] Dated: January 29, 2016. G.L. Tomasulo, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Charleston. [FR Doc. 2016-02621 Filed 2-10-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
![7256 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 28 / Thursday, February 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules
would have been if, holding constant Proposed Amendments to the described in paragraph (d)(8)(i)(C) of
the benefit formula, work history, and Regulations this section than the reduction that is
all other relevant factors used to Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is applied to benefits described in
determine benefits, those benefits were proposed to be amended as follows: paragraph (d)(8)(i)(B) of this section.
attributable to service with any other This requirement is satisfied if no
employer). PART 1—INCOME TAXES participant’s benefits that are directly
All comments will be available for attributable to service with an employer
public inspection and copying at ■ Paragraph 1. The authority citation described in paragraph (d)(8)(i)(C) of
www.regulations.gov or upon request. for part 1 continues to read in part as this section are reduced more than that
Please Note: All comments will be made follows: participant’s benefits would have been
available to the public. Do not include reduced if, holding the benefit formula,
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
any personally identifiable information work history, and all relevant factors
(such as Social Security number, name, ■ Par. 2. Section 1.432(e)(9)–1 is added used to compute benefits constant, those
address, or other contact information) or to read as follows: benefits were attributable to service
confidential business information that with an employer that is not described
§ 1.432(e)(9)–1 Benefit suspensions for
you do not want publicly disclosed. All multiemployer plans in critical and in paragraph (d)(8)(i)(C) of this section.
comments may be posted on the Internet declining status. (B) Application of limitation to
and can be retrieved by most Internet benefits of participants with respect to
(a) through (c) [Reserved]
search engines. which the employer has not assumed
A public hearing on these proposed (d) Limitations on suspension. (1)
through (7) [Reserved] liability. Benefits under a plan that are
regulations has been scheduled for directly attributable to a participant’s
March 22, 2016 beginning at 10 a.m. in (8) Additional rules for plans
described in section 432(e)(9)(D)(vii)— service with an employer described in
the Auditorium, Internal Revenue paragraph (d)(8)(i)(C) of this section
Service, 1111 Constitution Avenue NW., (i) In general. In the case of a plan that
includes the benefits described in include all such benefits without regard
Washington, DC. Due to building to whether the employer has assumed
security procedures, visitors must enter paragraph (d)(8)(i)(C) of this section, any
suspension of benefits under this liability for providing benefits to the
at the Constitution Avenue entrance. In participant that were reduced as a result
addition, all visitors must present photo section shall—
(A) First, be applied to the maximum of the financial status of the plan as
identification to enter the building. described in paragraph (d)(8)(i)(C)(2) of
Because of access restrictions, visitors extent permissible to benefits
attributable to a participant’s service for this section. Thus, all benefits under a
will not be admitted beyond the plan that are directly attributable to a
immediate entrance area more than 30 an employer that withdrew from the
plan and failed to pay (or is delinquent participant’s service with an employer
minutes before the hearing starts. For described in paragraph (d)(8)(i)(C) of
information about having your name with respect to paying) the full amount
of its withdrawal liability under section this section are subject to the limitation
placed on the building access list to in paragraph (d)(8)(ii)(A) of this section,
attend the hearing, see the FOR FURTHER 4201(b)(1) of ERISA or an agreement
with the plan; even if the employer has not, pursuant
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this to a collective bargaining agreement that
(B) Second, except as provided by
preamble. satisfies the requirements of paragraph
The rules of 26 CFR 601.601(a)(3) paragraph (d)(8)(i)(C) of this section, be
applied to all other benefits that may be (d)(8)(i)(C)(2) of this section, assumed
apply to the hearing. Persons who wish liability for providing those benefits to
to present oral comments at the hearing suspended under this section; and
(C) Third, be applied to benefits under participants and beneficiaries of the
must submit written or electronic plan.
comments by March 15, 2016, and an a plan that are directly attributable to a
outline of topics to be discussed and the participant’s service with any employer John Dalrymple,
amount of time to be devoted to each that has, prior to December 16, 2014— Deputy Commissioner for Services and
topic by March 15, 2016. A period of 10 (1) Withdrawn from the plan in a Enforcement.
minutes will be allotted to each person complete withdrawal under section [FR Doc. 2016–02772 Filed 2–9–16; 4:15 pm]
for making comments. An agenda 4203 of ERISA and paid the full amount
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
showing the scheduling of the speakers of the employer’s withdrawal liability
will be prepared after the deadline for under section 4201(b)(1) of ERISA or an
receiving outlines has passed. Copies of agreement with the plan, and
(2) Pursuant to a collective bargaining DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
the agenda will be available free of SECURITY
charge at the hearing. agreement, assumed liability for
providing benefits to participants and
Contact Information Coast Guard
beneficiaries of the plan under a
For general questions regarding these separate, single-employer plan
33 CFR Part 100
regulations, please contact the sponsored by the employer, in an
Department of the Treasury MPRA amount equal to any amount of benefits [Docket Number USCG–2016–0022]
guidance information line at (202) 622– for such participants and beneficiaries
reduced as a result of the financial RIN 1625–AA08
1559 (not a toll-free number). For
status of the plan.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
information regarding a specific Safety Zone; Cooper River Bridge Run,
application for a suspension of benefits, (ii) Application of suspensions to
Cooper River, and Town Creek
please contact the Treasury Department benefits that are directly attributable to
Reaches, Charleston, SC
at (202) 622–1534 (not a toll-free a participant’s service with certain
number). employers—(A) Greater reduction in AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
certain benefits not permitted. A ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1 suspension of benefits under this
Income taxes, Reporting and section must not be applied to provide SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
recordkeeping requirements. for a greater reduction in benefits establish a safety zone on the waters of
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:10 Feb 10, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\11FEP1.SGM 11FEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_7284/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 28 / Thursday, February 11, 2016 / Proposed Rules 7259
Dated: January 29, 2016. additional submission methods, please ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
G.L. Tomasulo, contact the person identified in the FOR AGENCY
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Port Charleston. For the full EPA public comment policy, 40 CFR Part 52
[FR Doc. 2016–02621 Filed 2–10–16; 8:45 am] information about CBI or multimedia [EPA–R04–OAR–2015–0155; FRL–9942–19–
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P submissions, and general guidance on Region 4]
making effective comments, please visit
http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ Approval and Promulgation of
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION commenting-epa-dockets. Implementation Plans; Mississippi;
AGENCY Infrastructure Requirements for the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 2010 Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient
40 CFR Part 52 Andrew Steckel, EPA Region IX, (415) Air Quality Standard
947–4115, email: steckel.andrew@
[EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0028; FRL–9942–02– epa.gov. AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Region 9] Agency.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the ACTION: Proposed rule.
Approval of Air Plan Revisions; ‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ section of this
Arizona; Rescissions and Corrections SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Federal Register, the EPA is approving
AGENCY: Environmental Protection the rescissions from the Arizona SIP, Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve,
Agency (EPA). and correcting the errors from previous in part, and disapprove in part, portions
Arizona SIP rulemakings, in a direct of the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
ACTION: Proposed rule.
final action without prior proposal submission, submitted by the State of
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection because we believe the SIP revision and Mississippi, through the Mississippi
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve error corrections are not controversial. Department of Environmental Quality
revisions to the Arizona State The rescissions involve statutory and (MDEQ), on June 20, 2013, to
Implementation Plan (SIP) under the demonstrate that the State meets the
regulatory provisions related to
Clean Air Act. These revisions include infrastructure requirements of the Clean
declarations of policy and legal
rescissions of certain statutory Air Act (CAA or Act) for the 2010 1-
authority, jurisdiction over Indian hour sulfur dioxide (SO2) national
provisions, administrative and lands, prohibitory rules, and test
prohibitory rules, and test methods. The ambient air quality standard (NAAQS).
methods and performance test The CAA requires that each state adopt
EPA is also proposing to correct certain
specifications. The error corrections and submit a SIP for the
errors in previous actions on prior
relate to an inadvertent listing of a rule implementation, maintenance and
revisions to the Arizona SIP and to
make certain other corrections. The on which the EPA did not take action enforcement of each NAAQS
intended effect is to rescind in the Arizona SIP, a typographical promulgated by EPA, which is
unnecessary provisions from the error, and erroneous approvals of non- commonly referred to as an
applicable SIP and to correct certain SIP submittals as part of the SIP. ‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP. MDEQ certified
errors in previous SIP actions. A detailed rationale for the approval that the Mississippi SIP contains
DATES: Comments must be received by of the rescissions and the correction of provisions that ensure the 2010 1-hour
March 14, 2016. the errors is set forth in the direct final SO2 NAAQS is implemented, enforced,
rule. If we receive adverse comments, and maintained in Mississippi. With the
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
however, we will publish a timely exception of the state board majority
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– requirements respecting significant
OAR–2016–0028 at http:// withdrawal of the direct final rule and
address the comments in a subsequent portion of income, for which EPA is
www.regulations.gov, or via email to proposing to disapprove, EPA is
Andrew Steckel, Rules Office Chief, at final rule based on this proposed rule.
proposing to determine that portions of
Steckel.Andrew@epa.gov. For comments Please note that if the EPA receives
Mississippi’s infrastructure submission,
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the adverse comment on an amendment, submitted to EPA on June 20, 2013,
online instructions for submitting paragraph, or section of this rule and if satisfy certain required infrastructure
comments. Once submitted, comments that provision may be severed from the elements for the 2010 1-hour SO2
cannot be edited or removed from remainder of the rule, the EPA may NAAQS.
Regulations.gov. For either manner of adopt as final those provisions of the
submission, the EPA may publish any rule that are not the subject of an DATES: Written comments must be
comment received to its public docket. adverse comment. received on or before March 14, 2016.
Do not submit electronically any ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
We do not plan to open a second
information you consider to be identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
Confidential Business Information (CBI) comment period, so anyone interested OAR–2015–0155, by one of the
or other information whose disclosure is in commenting should do so at this following methods:
restricted by statute. Multimedia time. If we do not receive adverse 1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be comments, no further activity is on-line instructions for submitting
accompanied by a written comment. planned. For further information, see comments.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
The written comment is considered the please see the direct final action. 2. Email: R4–ARMS@epa.gov.
official comment and should include Dated: January 25, 2016. 3. Fax: (404) 562–9019.
discussion of all points you wish to Jared Blumenfeld, 4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2015–
make. The EPA will generally not 0155,’’ Air Regulatory Management
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
consider comments or comment Section, Air Planning and
[FR Doc. 2016–02724 Filed 2–10–16; 8:45 am]
contents located outside of the primary Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides
submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or BILLING CODE 6560–50–P and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
other file sharing system). For Environmental Protection Agency,
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:10 Feb 10, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\11FEP1.SGM 11FEP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_7284/page/4.svg)
Document Created: 2016-02-11 00:03:30
Document Modified: 2016-02-11 00:03:30
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Notice of proposed rulemaking. | |
| Dates | Comments and related material must be received by the Coast Guard on or before February 26, 2016. | |
| Contact | If you have questions about this proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant John Downing, Sector Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843) 740-3184, email [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 7256 | |
| RIN Number | 1625-AA08 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR