81 FR 72567 - Glycine From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 203 (October 20, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 203 (October 20, 2016)
| Page Range | 72567-72568 | |
| FR Document | 2016-25430 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 203 (Thursday, October 20, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 72567-72568] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-25430] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-836] Glycine From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On April 15, 2016, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on glycine from the People's Republic of China (PRC).\1\ The review covers five companies, Baoding Mantong Fine Chemistry Co., Ltd. (Baoding Mantong), Kumar Industries (Kumar), Nutracare International (Nutracare), Ravi Industries (Ravi), and Rudraa International (Rudraa). The period of review (POR) is March 1, 2014, through February 28, 2015. As a result of our analysis of the comments and information received, these final results do not differ from the Preliminary Results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Glycine From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2014-2015, 81 FR 22212 (April 15, 2016) (Preliminary Results). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective October 20, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dena Crossland or Brian Davis, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3362 or (202) 482-7924, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On April 15, 2016, the Department published the Preliminary Results. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), we invited parties to comment on our Preliminary Results.\2\ On May 16, 2016, GEO submitted a case brief and requested a hearing.\3\ On August 10, 2016, the Department issued a memorandum extending the time period for issuing the final results of this administrative review from August 15, 2016, to October 12, 2016.\4\ On September 21, 2016, GEO withdrew its request for a public hearing. As no other party had requested a hearing, no public hearing was held. The Department conducted on-site verifications of Kumar and Salvi Chemical Industries Ltd., Nutracare's affiliate and glycine producer, from August 1, 2016, through August 5, 2016.\5\ On September 2, 2016, GEO and respondents submitted post- verification comments.\6\ On September 7, 2016, GEO and respondents submitted post-verification rebuttal comments.\7\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Preliminary Results at 22212-22213. \3\ See Letter to the Department of Commerce from GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. regarding ``Glycine from the People's Republic of China: GEO Specialty Chemicals' Case Brief,'' dated May 16, 2016. \4\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from Madeline Heeren, International Trade Compliance Analyst, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Office VI, through Scot Fullerton, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Office VI, on the subject of ``Glycine from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping; 2014/2015,'' dated August 10, 2016. \5\ See Memorandum to The File from Marcus A. Kraker, Import Policy Analyst, Office of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy & Negotiations, and Elisabeth Urfer, Senior International Trade Compliance Analyst, Customs Liaison Unit, through Brian Davis, Program Manager, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Office VI, on the subject of ``Verification of the Questionnaire Responses of Kumar Industries in the Antidumping Duty Review of Glycine from the People's Republic of China,'' dated August 19, 2016, and Memorandum to The File from Marcus A. Kraker, Import Policy Analyst, Office of Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy & Negotiations, and Elisabeth Urfer, Senior International Trade Compliance Analyst, Customs Liaison Unit, through Brian Davis, Program Manager, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Office VI, on the subject of ``Verification of the Questionnaire Responses of Salvi Chemical Industries Ltd. in the Antidumping Duty Review of Glycine from the People's Republic of China,'' dated August 19, 2016. \6\ See Letter to the Department of Commerce from GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. regarding ``Glycine from the People's Republic of China: Comments on Verification Reports,'' dated September 2, 2016, and Letter to the Department of Commerce from Nutracare International, Ravi Industries, Kumar Industries, and Rudraa International regarding ``Glycine from the People's Republic of China: Comments on the Preliminary Determination,'' dated September 2, 2016. In its September 2, 2016, letter, Nutracare, Kumar, Ravi, and Rudraa alleged that GEO submitted untimely, new factual information in its post-verification comments. On September 12, 2016, GEO, submitted a letter in response to respondents' new factual information allegation. We have rejected GEO's submission and requested that they resubmit their comments without the new factual information. GEO resubmitted their comments on October 7, 2016 (see Letter to the Department of Commerce from GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. regarding, ``Glycine from the People's Republic of China: Removal of Information from September 2, 2016 and September 7, 2016 Submissions,'' dated October 7, 2016). \7\ See Letter to the Department of Commerce from GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. regarding ``Glycine from the People's Republic of China: GEO's Rebuttal to the Preliminary Determination and Verification Report Comments of Nutracare, Ravi, Kumar and Rudraa,'' dated September 7, 2016, and Letter to the Department of Commerce from Nutracare International, Ravi Industries, Kumar Industries, and Rudraa International regarding ``Glycine from the People's Republic of China: Rebuttal Comments to Petitioner's Case Brief,'' dated September 7, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The product covered by the antidumping duty order is glycine, which is a free-flowing crystalline material, like salt or sugar.\8\ The subject merchandise is currently classifiable under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) subheading 2922.49.4020. The HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes only; the written product description of the scope of the order is dispositive.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ See ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Glycine from the People's Republic of China; 2014-2015'' from Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently with this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum), for a complete description of the scope of the order. \9\ See Glycine from the People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 60 FR 16116 (March 29, 1995). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs by parties to this administrative review are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\10\ A list of the issues that parties raised and to which we responded is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on-file electronically via ACCESS. ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Internet at http://enforcement.ita.doc.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Final Results of the Review Based on a review of the record and comments received from interested parties regarding our Preliminary Results, we determine that that Baoding Mantong, Kumar, Nutracare, Ravi, and Rudraa did not have reviewable transactions of subject merchandise during the POR. [[Page 72568]] Duty Assessment The Department shall determine and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. We intend to issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after publication of the final results of this review. Given that the Department continues to determine that the exporters under review had no shipments of the subject merchandise, any suspended entries that entered under the exporter's case number (i.e., at that exporter's rate) will be liquidated at the PRC-wide rate, in accordance with our practice.\11\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See Non-Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 23, 2011). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of this notice for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of these final results, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Baoding Mantong, Nutracare International, Ravi Industries, Kumar Industries, and Rudraa International, which all claimed no shipments, the cash deposit rate will remain unchanged from rates assigned to these companies in the most recently completed reviews of these companies; (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters who are not under review in this segment of the proceeding but who have separate rates, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the exporter-specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be the PRC-wide rate of 453.79 percent; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter(s) that supplied the non-PRC exporter. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers Regarding the Reimbursement of Duties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h). Dated: October 12, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. List of Issues III. Background IV. Scope of the Order V. Discussion of Interested Party Comments A. Kumar-Specific Issue Comment 1: Whether Kumar, Ravi, or Rudraa Had Shipments of Subject Merchandise During the Period of Review B. Salvi/Nutracare-Specific Issue Comment 2: Whether Nutracare/Salvi Had Shipments of Subject Merchandise During the Period of Review VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-25430 Filed 10-19-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 203 / Thursday, October 20, 2016 / Notices 72567
Dated: October 17, 2016. August 10, 2016, the Department issued Scope of the Order
Yvette Springer, a memorandum extending the time The product covered by the
Committee Liaison Officer. period for issuing the final results of antidumping duty order is glycine,
[FR Doc. 2016–25390 Filed 10–19–16; 8:45 am] this administrative review from August which is a free-flowing crystalline
BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P
15, 2016, to October 12, 2016.4 On material, like salt or sugar.8 The subject
September 21, 2016, GEO withdrew its merchandise is currently classifiable
request for a public hearing. As no other under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE party had requested a hearing, no public of the United States (HTSUS)
hearing was held. The Department subheading 2922.49.4020. The HTSUS
International Trade Administration conducted on-site verifications of subheading is provided for convenience
Kumar and Salvi Chemical Industries and customs purposes only; the written
[A–570–836]
Ltd., Nutracare’s affiliate and glycine product description of the scope of the
Glycine From the People’s Republic of producer, from August 1, 2016, through order is dispositive.9
China: Final Results of Antidumping August 5, 2016.5 On September 2, 2016,
GEO and respondents submitted post- Analysis of Comments Received
Duty Administrative Review; 2014–
2015 verification comments.6 On September All issues raised in the case and
7, 2016, GEO and respondents rebuttal briefs by parties to this
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, submitted post-verification rebuttal administrative review are addressed in
International Trade Administration, comments.7 the Issues and Decision
Department of Commerce. Memorandum.10 A list of the issues that
4 See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy
SUMMARY: On April 15, 2016, the parties raised and to which we
Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
Department of Commerce (the Countervailing Duty Operations, from Madeline
responded is attached to this notice as
Department) published the preliminary Heeren, International Trade Compliance Analyst, an Appendix. The Issues and Decision
results of the administrative review of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, Memorandum is a public document and
the antidumping duty order on glycine Office VI, through Scot Fullerton, Antidumping and is on-file electronically via ACCESS.
Countervailing Duty Operations, Office VI, on the
from the People’s Republic of China subject of ‘‘Glycine from the People’s Republic of
ACCESS is available to registered users
(PRC).1 The review covers five China: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of at http://access.trade.gov and in the
companies, Baoding Mantong Fine Antidumping; 2014/2015,’’ dated August 10, 2016. Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of
Chemistry Co., Ltd. (Baoding Mantong), 5 See Memorandum to The File from Marcus A.
the main Department of Commerce
Kraker, Import Policy Analyst, Office of Deputy building. In addition, a complete
Kumar Industries (Kumar), Nutracare Assistant Secretary for Policy & Negotiations, and
International (Nutracare), Ravi Elisabeth Urfer, Senior International Trade version of the Issues and Decision
Industries (Ravi), and Rudraa Compliance Analyst, Customs Liaison Unit, through Memorandum can be accessed directly
International (Rudraa). The period of Brian Davis, Program Manager, Antidumping and on the Internet at http://
Countervailing Duty Operations, Office VI, on the enforcement.ita.doc.gov/frn/index.html.
review (POR) is March 1, 2014, through subject of ‘‘Verification of the Questionnaire
February 28, 2015. As a result of our Responses of Kumar Industries in the Antidumping
The signed Issues and Decision
analysis of the comments and Duty Review of Glycine from the People’s Republic Memorandum and the electronic
information received, these final results of China,’’ dated August 19, 2016, and version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum to The File from Marcus A. Kraker, Memorandum are identical in content.
do not differ from the Preliminary Import Policy Analyst, Office of Deputy Assistant
Results. Secretary for Policy & Negotiations, and Elisabeth Final Results of the Review
DATES: Effective October 20, 2016. Urfer, Senior International Trade Compliance
Analyst, Customs Liaison Unit, through Brian Based on a review of the record and
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Davis, Program Manager, Antidumping and comments received from interested
Dena Crossland or Brian Davis, AD/CVD Countervailing Duty Operations, Office VI, on the parties regarding our Preliminary
Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and subject of ‘‘Verification of the Questionnaire
Responses of Salvi Chemical Industries Ltd. in the
Results, we determine that that Baoding
Compliance, International Trade Antidumping Duty Review of Glycine from the Mantong, Kumar, Nutracare, Ravi, and
Administration, U.S. Department of People’s Republic of China,’’ dated August 19, Rudraa did not have reviewable
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 2016. transactions of subject merchandise
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 6 See Letter to the Department of Commerce from
during the POR.
(202) 482–3362 or (202) 482–7924, GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. regarding ‘‘Glycine
from the People’s Republic of China: Comments on
respectively. Verification Reports,’’ dated September 2, 2016, and Rebuttal to the Preliminary Determination and
Letter to the Department of Commerce from Verification Report Comments of Nutracare, Ravi,
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Kumar and Rudraa,’’ dated September 7, 2016, and
Nutracare International, Ravi Industries, Kumar
Industries, and Rudraa International regarding Letter to the Department of Commerce from
Background Nutracare International, Ravi Industries, Kumar
‘‘Glycine from the People’s Republic of China:
On April 15, 2016, the Department Comments on the Preliminary Determination,’’ Industries, and Rudraa International regarding
dated September 2, 2016. In its September 2, 2016, ‘‘Glycine from the People’s Republic of China:
published the Preliminary Results. In Rebuttal Comments to Petitioner’s Case Brief,’’
letter, Nutracare, Kumar, Ravi, and Rudraa alleged
accordance with 19 CFR that GEO submitted untimely, new factual dated September 7, 2016.
351.309(c)(1)(ii), we invited parties to information in its post-verification comments. On 8 See ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
comment on our Preliminary Results.2 September 12, 2016, GEO, submitted a letter in Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
On May 16, 2016, GEO submitted a case response to respondents’ new factual information Administrative Review: Glycine from the People’s
allegation. We have rejected GEO’s submission and Republic of China; 2014–2015’’ from Christian
brief and requested a hearing.3 On requested that they resubmit their comments Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
without the new factual information. GEO and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Ronald K.
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
1 See Glycine From the People’s Republic of Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for
resubmitted their comments on October 7, 2016 (see
China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Letter to the Department of Commerce from GEO Enforcement and Compliance, dated concurrently
Administrative Review; 2014–2015, 81 FR 22212 Specialty Chemicals, Inc. regarding, ‘‘Glycine from with this notice (Issues and Decision
(April 15, 2016) (Preliminary Results). the People’s Republic of China: Removal of Memorandum), for a complete description of the
2 See Preliminary Results at 22212–22213. Information from September 2, 2016 and September scope of the order.
3 See Letter to the Department of Commerce from 7, 2016 Submissions,’’ dated October 7, 2016). 9 See Glycine from the People’s Republic of
GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. regarding ‘‘Glycine 7 See Letter to the Department of Commerce from China: Antidumping Duty Order, 60 FR 16116
from the People’s Republic of China: GEO Specialty GEO Specialty Chemicals, Inc. regarding ‘‘Glycine (March 29, 1995).
Chemicals’ Case Brief,’’ dated May 16, 2016. from the People’s Republic of China: GEO’s 10 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:40 Oct 19, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM 20OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_72770/page/1.svg)
![72568 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 203 / Thursday, October 20, 2016 / Notices
Duty Assessment Department’s presumption that citric acid and certain citrate salts from
The Department shall determine and reimbursement of antidumping and/or the People’s Republic of China (PRC) for
U.S. Customs and Border Protection countervailing duties occurred and the the period of review January 1, 2015,
(CBP) shall assess antidumping duties subsequent assessment of doubled through December 31, 2015, based on
on all appropriate entries. We intend to antidumping duties. the timely withdrawal of the only
issue assessment instructions directly to request for review.
Administrative Protective Order
CBP 15 days after publication of the DATES: Effective October 20, 2016.
This notice also serves as a reminder
final results of this review. Given that FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
to parties subject to administrative Alice Maldonado, Enforcement and
the Department continues to determine
that the exporters under review had no protective orders (APO) of their Compliance, International Trade
shipments of the subject merchandise, responsibility concerning the return or Administration, U.S. Department of
any suspended entries that entered destruction of proprietary information Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
under the exporter’s case number (i.e., at disclosed under APO in accordance NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
that exporter’s rate) will be liquidated at with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which (202) 482–4682.
the PRC-wide rate, in accordance with continues to govern business
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
our practice.11 proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written Background
Cash Deposit Requirements notification of the return/destruction of On May 2, 2016, the Department
The following cash deposit APO materials, or conversion to judicial published in the Federal Register a
requirements will be effective upon protective order, is hereby requested. notice of ‘‘Opportunity to Request
publication of this notice for all Failure to comply with the regulations Administrative Review’’ of the
shipments of subject merchandise and the terms of an APO is a countervailing duty order on citric acid
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, sanctionable violation. and certain citrate salts (citric acid) from
for consumption on or after the We are issuing and publishing this
the PRC for the period January 1, 2015,
publication of these final results, as notice in accordance with sections
through December 31, 2015.1 In May
provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
2016, the Department received a timely
Act: (1) For Baoding Mantong, Nutracare CFR 351.213(h).
request, in accordance with section
International, Ravi Industries, Kumar Dated: October 12, 2016. 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
Industries, and Rudraa International, Paul Piquado, amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
which all claimed no shipments, the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 351.213(b), for an administrative review
cash deposit rate will remain unchanged Compliance. of this countervailing duty order from
from rates assigned to these companies the Archer Daniels Midland Company,
in the most recently completed reviews Appendix
Cargill, Incorporated, and Tate & Lyle
of these companies; (2) for previously List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues Ingredients Americas LLC (collectively,
investigated or reviewed PRC and non- and Decision Memorandum the petitioners).2 On July 7, 2016, the
PRC exporters who are not under review I. Summary Department published in the Federal
in this segment of the proceeding but II. List of Issues Register a notice of initiation with
who have separate rates, the cash III. Background
respect to 18 individually-named
deposit rate will continue to be the IV. Scope of the Order
V. Discussion of Interested Party Comments companies or company groups.3
exporter-specific rate published for the On October 5, 2016, the petitioners
A. Kumar-Specific Issue
most recent period; (3) for all PRC timely withdrew their administrative
Comment 1: Whether Kumar, Ravi, or
exporters of subject merchandise that Rudraa Had Shipments of Subject review request.4
have not been found to be entitled to a Merchandise During the Period of
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will Review Rescission of Review
be the PRC-wide rate of 453.79 percent; B. Salvi/Nutracare-Specific Issue Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the
and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of Comment 2: Whether Nutracare/Salvi Had Department will rescind an
subject merchandise which have not Shipments of Subject Merchandise administrative review, in whole or in
received their own rate, the cash deposit During the Period of Review
part, if a party that requested a review
VI. Recommendation
rate will be the rate applicable to the withdraws the request within 90 days of
PRC exporter(s) that supplied the non- [FR Doc. 2016–25430 Filed 10–19–16; 8:45 am] the date of publication of notice of
PRC exporter. These cash deposit BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P initiation of the requested review. The
requirements, when imposed, shall petitioners withdrew their requests for
remain in effect until further notice. review by the 90-day deadline. No other
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE parties requested an administrative
Notification to Importers Regarding the
Reimbursement of Duties International Trade Administration review of the order. Therefore, we are
rescinding the administrative review of
This notice also serves as a final [C–570–938] the countervailing duty order on citric
reminder to importers of their acid from the PRC covering the period
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts
to file a certificate regarding the From the People’s Republic of China: 1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
reimbursement of antidumping and/or Rescission of Countervailing Duty Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
countervailing duties prior to Administrative Review; 2015 to Request Administrative Review, 81 FR 26206
(May 2, 2016).
liquidation of the relevant entries AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 2 See letter requesting an administrative review
during the POR. Failure to comply with International Trade Administration, from the petitioners, dated May 31, 2016.
this requirement could result in the Department of Commerce. 3 See Initiation of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 44260 (July 7, 2016).
11 See Non-Market Economy Antidumping SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 4 See the letter withdrawing request for an
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 is rescinding the administrative review administrative review from the petitioners, dated
FR 65694 (October 23, 2011). of the countervailing duty order on October 5, 2016.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:40 Oct 19, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\20OCN1.SGM 20OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_72770/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2016-10-21 09:59:07
Document Modified: 2016-10-21 09:59:07
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective October 20, 2016. | |
| Contact | Dena Crossland or Brian Davis, AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3362 or (202) 482-7924, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 72567 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR