81 FR 74393 - Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: Rescission of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews; 2014-2015
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 207 (October 26, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 207 (October 26, 2016)
| Page Range | 74393-74395 | |
| FR Document | 2016-25901 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 26, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 74393-74395] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-25901] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-970] Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: Rescission of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews; 2014-2015 AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Department) finds that the sale made by Dongtai Zhangshi Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (Zhangshi) and the sale made by Huzhou Muyun Wood Co., Ltd. (Muyun) are non-bona fide. Therefore, we are rescinding these new shipper reviews (NSRs). DATES: Effective October 26, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Galantucci (202-482-2923) or Aleksandras Nakutis (202-482-3147), AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Department published its Preliminary Rescission of the NSRs of the antidumping duty order on multilayered wood flooring from the People's Republic of China (PRC) on May 31, 2016.\1\ We preliminarily found that the sale made by Zhangshi and the sale made by Muyun were not bona fide, and announced our preliminary intent to rescind the NSRs. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Rescission of 2014-2015 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews, 81 FR 34310 (May 31, 2016) (Preliminary Rescission); see also Memorandum from Robert Galantucci to Abdelali Elouaradia, ``Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China: Bona Fide Sale Analysis for Dongtai Zhangshi Wood Industry Co., Ltd.,'' dated May 20, 2016 (Zhangshi Prelim Bona Fide Memo); Memorandum from Aleksandras Nakutis to Abdelali Elouaradia, ``Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China: Bona Fide Sale Analysis for Huzhou Muyun Wood Co., Ltd.,'' dated May 20, 2016 (Muyun Prelim Bona Fide Memo). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For a complete description of the events that followed the publication of the Preliminary Rescission, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\2\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping Duty (AD) and Countervailing Duty (CVD) Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. The signed Issues and Decision Memorandum and the electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Memorandum from Christian Marsh to Ronald K. Lorentzen, ``Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Rescission of the 2014- 2015 New Shipper Reviews'' issued concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by the order is multilayered wood flooring, which is [[Page 74394]] composed of an assembly of two or more layers or plies of wood veneers \3\ in combination with a core.\4\ Merchandise covered by this review is classifiable under subheadings 4412.31.0520; 4412.31.0540; 4412.31.0560; 4412.31.2510; 4412.31.2520; 4412.31.4040; 4412.31.4050; 4412.31.4060; 4412.31.4070; 4412.31.4075; 4412.31.4080; 4412.31.5125; 4412.31.5135; 4412.31.5155; 4412.31.5165; 4412.31.6000; 4412.31.9100; 4412.32.0520; 4412.32.0540; 4412.32.0560; 4412.32.0565; 4412.32.0570; 4412.32.2510; 4412.32.2520; 4412.32.2525; 4412.32.2530; 4412.32.3125; 4412.32.3135; 4412.32.3155; 4412.32.3165; 4412.32.3175; 4412.32.3185; 4412.32.5600; 4412.39.1000; 4412.39.3000; 4412.39.4011; 4412.39.4012; 4412.39.4019; 4412.39.4031; 4412.39.4032; 4412.39.4039; 4412.39.4051; 4412.39.4052; 4412.39.4059; 4412.39.4061; 4412.39.4062; 4412.39.4069; 4412.39.5010; 4412.39.5030; 4412.39.5050; 4412.94.1030; 4412.94.1050; 4412.94.3105; 4412.94.3111; 4412.94.3121; 4412.94.3131; 4412.94.3141; 4412.94.3160; 4412.94.3171; 4412.94.4100; 4412.94.5100; 4412.94.6000; 4412.94.7000; 4412.94.8000; 4412.94.9000; 4412.94.9500; 4412.99.0600; 4412.99.1020; 4412.99.1030; 4412.99.1040; 4412.99.3110; 4412.99.3120; 4412.99.3130; 4412.99.3140; 4412.99.3150; 4412.99.3160; 4412.99.3170; 4412.99.4100; 4412.99.5100; 4412.99.5105; 4412.99.5115; 4412.99.5710; 4412.99.6000; 4412.99.7000; 4412.99.8000; 4412.99.9000; 4412.99.9500; 4418.71.2000; 4418.71.9000; 4418.72.2000; 4418.72.9500; and 9801.00.2500 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ A ``veneer'' is a thin slice of wood, rotary cut, sliced or sawed from a log, bolt or flitch. Veneer is referred to as a ply when assembled. \4\ For a complete description of the scope of the order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the case briefs by parties are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\5\ A list of the issues which parties raised is attached to this notice as an Appendix. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum. The Department has also issued business proprietary discussions of the comments raised, as many of the comments relied heavily on business proprietary information (BPI). See Memorandum to Abdelali Elouaradia, ``Final Results of the Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review--Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China: Business Proprietary Information Discussion of the Comments Regarding Dongtai Zhangshi Wood Industry Co., Ltd.,'' dated October 17, 2016 (BPI Discussion of Zhangshi's Comments); Memorandum to Abdelali Elouaradia, ``Final Results of the Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review--Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China: Business Proprietary Information Discussion of the Comments Regarding Huzhou Muyun Wood Co., Ltd.,'' dated October 17, 2016 (BPI Discussion of Muyun's Comments). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bona Fide Analysis For the Preliminary Rescission, the Department analyzed the bona fides of Zhangshi's single sale and Muyun's single sale and preliminarily found that they were not bona fide sales.\6\ Based on the Department's complete analysis of all of the information and comments on the record of this review, the Department continues to find Zhangshi's and Muyun's sales not bona fide, and thus not reviewable pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The Department reached this conclusion with respect to Zhangshi based on its consideration of the totality of circumstances, including: The sale price, the timing of the payment, a comparison between the payment and the invoiced amount, the parties' implementation of the terms of sale, statements regarding the customer/ importer's affiliations, and the single sale. The Department reached this conclusion with respect to Muyun based on its consideration of the totality of circumstances, including: The sale price, the timing of the payment, and the single sale. For a complete discussion, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum as well as the BPI Discussion of Zhangshi's Comments and the BPI Discussion of Muyun's Comments. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Zhangshi Prelim Bona Fide Memo; Muyun Prelim Bona Fide Memo. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rescission of New Shipper Reviews For the foregoing reasons, the Department continues to find that Zhangshi's sale and Muyun's sale are not bona fide, and that the sales do not provide a reasonable or reliable basis for calculating a dumping margin. Accordingly, the Department is rescinding these NSRs. Assessment As the Department is rescinding these NSRs, we are not making a determination as to whether or not Zhangshi or Muyun qualify for a separate rate. Therefore, these companies remain part of the PRC- entity. The PRC-entity is not under review in the ongoing review covering the 2014-2015 period. Accordingly, these companies' entries will be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of, or bond for, estimated antidumping duties required on their merchandise at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption. The Department intends to issue liquidation instructions for any entries during the relevant period made by Zhangshi and Muyun 15 days after publication of this rescission notice. Cash Deposit Requirements Effective upon publication of this notice of final rescission of the NSRs of Zhangshi and Muyun, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to discontinue the option of posting a bond or security in lieu of a cash deposit for entries of subject merchandise from Zhangshi and Muyun.\7\ Because we did not review Zhangshi or Muyun, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered which was the cash deposit rate for the PRC- wide entity of 25.62 percent. These cash deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 19 CFR 351.214(e). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to Administrative Protective Order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in these segments of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214. Dated: October 17, 2016. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix--Issues and Decision Memorandum Summary Background Scope of the Order [[Page 74395]] Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Whether the Department should revise its analysis with respect to Zhangshi's sales price and quantity. Comment 2: Whether the Department should revise its analysis regarding Zhangshi's customer's resale of the subject merchandise. Comment 3: Whether the Department should revise its analysis regarding Zhangshi's implementation of the terms of sale. Comment 4: Whether the Department should revise its analysis regarding the circumstances surrounding Zhangshi's receipt of payment. Comment 5: Whether the Department made procedural errors in conducting this review. Comment 6: Whether Muyun's sale was resold at a profit. Comment 7: Whether the timing of Muyun's sale was consistent with normal commercial practices. Comment 8: Whether Muyun's sale price was based on normal commercial considerations. Comment 9: Whether the totality of the circumstances indicates that Muyun's sale was bona fide. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-25901 Filed 10-25-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 26, 2016 / Notices 74393
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered: possessed or controlled by the Denied FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
First, from the date of this Order until Person, or service any item, of whatever Robert Galantucci (202–482–2923) or
August 14, 2018, Junaid Peerani, with a origin, that is owned, possessed or Aleksandras Nakutis (202–482–3147),
last known address of 1331 NW. 115th controlled by the Denied Person if such AD/CVD Operations, Office IV,
Ave., Plantation, FL 33323, and when service involves the use of any item Enforcement and Compliance,
acting for or on his behalf, his subject to the Regulations that has been International Trade Administration,
successors, assigns, employees, agents or will be exported from the United Department of Commerce, 1401
or representatives (the ‘‘Denied States. For purposes of this paragraph, Constitution Avenue NW., Washington,
Person’’), may not, directly or indirectly, servicing means installation, DC 20230.
participate in any way in any maintenance, repair, modification or SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
transaction involving any commodity, testing.
software or technology (hereinafter Background
Third, after notice and opportunity for
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) comment as provided in Section 766.23 The Department published its
exported or to be exported from the of the Regulations, any other person, Preliminary Rescission of the NSRs of
United States that is subject to the firm, corporation, or business the antidumping duty order on
Regulations, including, but not limited organization related to Peerani by multilayered wood flooring from the
to: ownership, control, position of People’s Republic of China (PRC) on
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using responsibility, affiliation, or other May 31, 2016.1 We preliminarily found
any license, License Exception, or connection in the conduct of trade or that the sale made by Zhangshi and the
export control document; business may also be made subject to sale made by Muyun were not bona fide,
B. Carrying on negotiations the provisions of this Order in order to and announced our preliminary intent
concerning, or ordering, buying, prevent evasion of this Order. to rescind the NSRs.
receiving, using, selling, delivering, Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of For a complete description of the
storing, disposing of, forwarding, the Regulations, Peerani may file an events that followed the publication of
transporting, financing, or otherwise appeal of this Order with the Under the Preliminary Rescission, see the
servicing in any way, any transaction Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Issues and Decision Memorandum.2 The
involving any item exported or to be Security. The appeal must be filed Issues and Decision Memorandum is a
exported from the United States that is within 45 days from the date of this public document and is on file
subject to the Regulations, or in any Order and must comply with the electronically via Enforcement and
other activity subject to the Regulations; provisions of Part 756 of the Compliance’s Antidumping Duty (AD)
or Regulations. and Countervailing Duty (CVD)
C. Benefitting in any way from any Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be Centralized Electronic Service System
transaction involving any item exported delivered to the Peerani. This Order (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
or to be exported from the United States shall be published in the Federal registered users at http://
that is subject to the Regulations, or in Register. access.trade.gov and in the Central
any other activity subject to the Sixth, this Order is effective Records Unit, room B8024 of the main
Regulations. Department of Commerce building. In
immediately and shall remain in effect
Second, no person may, directly or addition, a complete version of the
until August 14, 2018.
indirectly, do any of the following: Issues and Decision Memorandum can
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf Dated: October 19, 2016. be accessed directly at http://
of the Denied Person any item subject to Karen H. Nies-Vogel, enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
the Regulations; Director, Office of Exporter Services. The signed Issues and Decision
B. Take any action that facilitates the [FR Doc. 2016–25858 Filed 10–25–16; 8:45 am] Memorandum and the electronic
acquisition or attempted acquisition by BILLING CODE P version of the Issues and Decision
the Denied Person of the ownership, Memorandum are identical in content.
possession, or control of any item
Scope of the Order
subject to the Regulations that has been DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
or will be exported from the United The merchandise covered by the order
States, including financing or other International Trade Administration is multilayered wood flooring, which is
support activities related to a
1 See Multilayered Wood Flooring From the
transaction whereby the Denied Person [A–570–970]
People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Rescission
acquires or attempts to acquire such of 2014–2015 Antidumping Duty New Shipper
ownership, possession or control; Multilayered Wood Flooring From the Reviews, 81 FR 34310 (May 31, 2016) (Preliminary
C. Take any action to acquire from or People’s Republic of China: Rescission); see also Memorandum from Robert
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted Rescission of Antidumping Duty New Galantucci to Abdelali Elouaradia, ‘‘Antidumping
Duty New Shipper Review of Multilayered Wood
acquisition from the Denied Person of Shipper Reviews; 2014–2015 Flooring from the People’s Republic of China: Bona
any item subject to the Regulations that AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, Fide Sale Analysis for Dongtai Zhangshi Wood
has been exported from the United Industry Co., Ltd.,’’ dated May 20, 2016 (Zhangshi
International Trade Administration, Prelim Bona Fide Memo); Memorandum from
States; Department of Commerce. Aleksandras Nakutis to Abdelali Elouaradia,
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in ‘‘Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of
the United States any item subject to the SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People’s
Regulations with knowledge or reason (Department) finds that the sale made by Republic of China: Bona Fide Sale Analysis for
Dongtai Zhangshi Wood Industry Co., Huzhou Muyun Wood Co., Ltd.,’’ dated May 20,
to know that the item will be, or is 2016 (Muyun Prelim Bona Fide Memo).
intended to be, exported from the Ltd. (Zhangshi) and the sale made by 2 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh to
United States; or Huzhou Muyun Wood Co., Ltd. Ronald K. Lorentzen, ‘‘Multilayered Wood Flooring
E. Engage in any transaction to service (Muyun) are non-bona fide. Therefore, from the People’s Republic of China: Issues and
any item subject to the Regulations that we are rescinding these new shipper Decision Memorandum for the Final Rescission of
the 2014–2015 New Shipper Reviews’’ issued
has been or will be exported from the reviews (NSRs). concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
United States and which is owned, DATES: Effective October 26, 2016. notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:25 Oct 25, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_74600/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 26, 2016 / Notices 74395
Discussion of the Issues Background ‘‘Telephone Call with Counsel for
Comment 1: Whether the Department should Ventura Coastal’’.
revise its analysis with respect to On September 10, 2007, the On September 30, 2016, Ventura
Zhangshi’s sales price and quantity. Department entered into an agreement requested, and the Department granted,
Comment 2: Whether the Department should with S.A. San Miguel A.G.I.C.I. y F., an extension of the deadline for
revise its analysis regarding Zhangshi’s (‘‘San Miguel’’) and Citrusvil, S.A.,
customer’s resale of the subject
submitting comments to October 3,
Argentine producers/exporters 2016. See September 30, 2016, letter
merchandise. accounting for substantially all imports
Comment 3: Whether the Department should from Matthew T. McGrath, re:
of lemon juice from Argentina. See ‘‘Agreement Suspending the
revise its analysis regarding Zhangshi’s
implementation of the terms of sale. Suspension of Antidumping Duty Antidumping Duty Investigation on
Comment 4: Whether the Department should Investigation: Lemon Juice From Lemon Juice from Argentina: Extension
revise its analysis regarding the Argentina, 72 FR 53991 (September 21, Request’’ and September 30, 2016, letter
circumstances surrounding Zhangshi’s 2007) (‘‘2007 Agreement’’). On from Sally C. Gannon to Matthew T.
receipt of payment. September 17, 2009, Citromax S.A.C.I. McGrath, re ‘‘Agreement Suspending
Comment 5: Whether the Department made acceded to the 2007 Agreement. On July the Antidumping Investigation on
procedural errors in conducting this 11, 2014, La Moraleja, S.A. and
review.
Lemon Juice from Argentina: Extension
Cooperativa de Productores Citricolas for Comments on Draft Agreement’’. We
Comment 6: Whether Muyun’s sale was
de Tafi Viejo (‘‘COTA’’) acceded to the received comments from COTA, San
resold at a profit.
Comment 7: Whether the timing of Muyun’s 2007 Agreement. Miguel and Ventura. See October 3,
sale was consistent with normal On April 28, 2016, the Department 2016, letter from Gregory S. Menegaz re:
commercial practices. notified the interested parties and the ‘‘Lemon Juice from Argentina COTA
Comment 8: Whether Muyun’s sale price was International Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’) Comment Draft Suspension Agreement:
based on normal commercial of the intent to suspend the Correction of Formal Name’’ (‘‘COTA
considerations. investigation on Lemon Juice from comments’’); October 3, 2016, letter
Comment 9: Whether the totality of the Argentina pursuant to section 734(c) of from Gregory J. Spak re: ‘‘Lemon Juice
circumstances indicates that Muyun’s sale
was bona fide.
the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’). See from Argentina Comments on Draft
Recommendation April 28, 2016, letters from Sally C. Suspension Agreement’’ (‘‘San Miguel
Gannon to Interested Parties and comments’’); and, September 30, 2016
[FR Doc. 2016–25901 Filed 10–25–16; 8:45 am]
Catherine DeFillipo, re ‘‘Lemon Juice (filed October 3, 2016), letter from
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
from Argentina—Intent to Suspend Matthew T. McGrath re: ‘‘Agreement
Investigation Pursuant to Section 734(c) Suspending the Antidumping Duty
of the Act’’. On September 23, 2016, the Investigation on Lemon Juice from
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Department and Argentine lemon juice Argentina: Comments on Proposed New
International Trade Administration growers/exporters accounting for Suspension Agreement’’. On October 11,
substantially all lemon juice imported 2016, we received additional comments
[A–357–818] into the United States from Argentina from Ventura. See October 10, 2016,
initialed a proposed agreement pursuant letter from Matthew T. McGrath re:
Lemon Juice From Argentina: ‘‘Agreement Suspending the
to section 734(c) of the Act to suspend
Continuation of Suspension of Antidumping Duty Investigation on
the antidumping investigation on lemon
Antidumping Investigation Lemon Juice from Argentina: Additional
juice from Argentina. The Department
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, released the proposed agreement and Comments on Proposed New
International Trade Administration, accompanying memorandum detailing Suspension Agreement’’ (‘‘Ventura
Department of Commerce the fulfillment of the statutory additional comments’’).
requirements to interested parties on The Department examined the
DATES: Effective Date: October 20, 2016.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce September 23, 2016, and afforded them comments and incorporated changes in
an opportunity to comment on the the agreement text and statutory
(‘‘the Department’’) is continuing to
initialed agreement and the memorandum, where appropriate, to
suspend the antidumping duty
memorandum by September 30, 2016. address those comments. Specifically,
investigation on lemon juice from
See September 23, 2016, Memorandum in its comments, in response to COTA’s
Argentina. The basis for this action is an
from Sally C. Gannon to Interested comments we revised the company’s
agreement between the Department and
Parties, re ‘‘Agreement Suspending the name to reflect the full legal name of the
signatory producers/exporters
Antidumping Duty Investigation on company, Cooperativa de Productores
accounting for substantially all imports
Lemon Juice from Argentina’’. On Citricolas de Tafi Viejo, Agricola, de
of lemon juice from Argentina, wherein
September 26, 2016, in accordance with Transformacion y Comercializacion
each signatory producer/exporter has
section 734(e)(2)of the Act, the Limitada, however we note that COTA
agreed to revise its prices to eliminate also uses the name Cooperativa de
completely the injurious effects of Department consulted with the
successor-in-interest to the petitioner, Productores Citricolas de Tafi Viejo in
exports of the subject merchandise to the ordinary course of business. See
the United States. Ventura Coastal, LLC (‘‘Ventura’’),1 and
explained how the agreement will be COTA comments. In response to
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ventura’s comments, the definition of
Sally Craig Gannon or Julie Santoboni at carried out and enforced and how the
‘reference price’ was revised to clarify
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(202) 482–0162 or (202) 482–3063, agreement will meet the requirements of
that the price applies to the price of
respectively; Bilateral Agreements Unit, sections 734(c) and (d) of the Act. See
exports to the United States. Section
Office of Policy, Enforcement and September 29, 2016, Memorandum from
VII.A.3 of the 2016 Suspension
Compliance, International Trade Julie H. Santoboni to The File re
Agreement was revised to reflect that
Administration, U.S. Department of the quarterly Argentine customs data
1 See Lemon Juice From Argentina: Final Results
Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution will reflect shipments, rather than sales
of the Expedited First Sunset Review of the
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. Suspended Antidumping Duty Investigation, 77 FR data. In San Miguel’s comments it
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 73021 (Dec. 7, 2012). requested that the Department expedite
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:25 Oct 25, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_74600/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-10-26 02:17:54
Document Modified: 2016-10-26 02:17:54
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective October 26, 2016. | |
| Contact | Robert Galantucci (202-482-2923) or Aleksandras Nakutis (202-482-3147), AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 74393 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR