81 FR 74401 - Stainless Steel Bar From Spain: Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 207 (October 26, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 207 (October 26, 2016)
| Page Range | 74401-74402 | |
| FR Document | 2016-25906 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 207 (Wednesday, October 26, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 74401-74402] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-25906] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-469-805] Stainless Steel Bar From Spain: Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is initiating a changed circumstances review of the antidumping duty order on stainless steel bar (SSB) from Spain with respect to Sidenor Aceros Especiales S.L. Based on the information on the record, we preliminarily determine that Sidenor Aceros Especiales S.L. is the successor-in-interest to Gerdau Aceros Especiales Europa for purposes of determining antidumping duty liability. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective October 26, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael A. Romani, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0198. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The Department published the antidumping duty order on SSB from Spain on March 2, 1995.\1\ In its September 6, 2016, request for a changed circumstances review, Sidenor Aceros Especiales S.L. (Sidenor), informed the Department that, effective May 20, 2016, the following occurred: (1) Gerdau S.A., the Brazilian owner of Gerdau Holdings Europa S.A.U., including its Spanish subsidiary company Gerdau Aceros Especiales Europa, S.L. (Gerdau), sold its European holdings to Clerbil S.L.; and (2) Clerbil S.L. renamed Gerdau Holdings Europa S.A.U. to be Sidenor Holdings Europa S.A.U., and Gerdau Aceros Especiales Europa, S.L., to be Sidenor Aceros Especiales S.L. leaving its operations mostly unchanged.\2\ Gerdau is a respondent in the ongoing administrative review of the antidumping duty order on SSB from Spain covering the period March 1, 2015, through February 29, 2016.\3\ Because this changed circumstances review was requested for an effective date after the POR of the ongoing administrative review, it does not have any bearing on that review.\4\ Citing section 751(b) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.216 Sidenor, requested that the Department initiate a changed circumstances review and determine that Sidenor Aceros Especiales S.L., is the successor-in-interest to Gerdau. Sidenor also requested that the Department issue the initiation and preliminary results as a single notice, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(c)(ii). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Amended Final Determination and Antidumping Duty Order: Stainless Steel Bar From Spain, 60 FR 11656 (March 2, 1995). \2\ See Sidenor's Letter to the Secretary of Commerce, entitled, ``Stainless Steel Bar from Spain: Sidenor request for changed- circumstances review,'' dated September 22, 2016, (Sidenor Request) at 3-6. \3\ See Initiation of Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR 26203 (May 2, 2016). \4\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to the order is SSB. The term SSB with respect to the order means articles of stainless steel in straight lengths that have been either hot-rolled, forged, turned, cold-drawn, cold-rolled or otherwise cold-finished, or ground, having a uniform solid cross section along their whole length in the shape of circles, segments of circles, ovals, rectangles (including squares), triangles, hexagons, octagons or other convex polygons. SSB includes cold-finished SSBs that are turned or ground in straight lengths, whether produced from hot-rolled bar or from straightened and cut rod or wire, and reinforcing bars that have indentations, ribs, grooves, or other deformations produced during the rolling process. Except as specified above, the term does not include stainless steel semi-finished products, cut-length flat-rolled products (i.e., cut-length rolled products which if less than 4.75 mm in thickness have a width measuring at least 10 times the thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in thickness having a width which exceeds 150 mm and measures at least twice the thickness), wire (i.e., cold-formed products in coils, of any uniform solid cross section along their whole length, which do not conform to the definition of flat-rolled products), and angles, shapes and sections. The SSB subject to the order is currently classifiable under subheadings 7222.10.00, 7222.11.00, 7222.19.00, 7222.20.00, 7222.30.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ The HTSUS numbers provided in the scope changed since the publication of the order. See Amended Final Determination and Antidumping Duty Order: Stainless Steel Bar From Spain, 60 FR 11656 (March 2, 1995). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.216(d), the Department will conduct a changed circumstances review upon receipt of a request from an interested party or receipt of information concerning an antidumping duty order which shows changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review of the order. Based on the request from Sidenor, and in accordance with section 751(b)(1) of Act and 19 CFR 351.216(b), we are initiating a changed circumstances review to determine whether Sidenor is the successor-in-interest to Gerdau. The Department's regulations at section 351.221(c)(3)(ii) instruct that, if we conclude that an expedited action is warranted, we may combine the notices of initiation and preliminary results of a changed circumstances review. In this instance, because we have the information necessary on the record to make a preliminary finding, we find that an expedited action is warranted and are combining the notices of initiation and preliminary results. Preliminary Results of Expedited Changed Circumstances Review In making a successor-in-interest determination, the Department examines several factors including, but not limited to, changes in management, production facilities, supplier relationships, and customer base.\6\ While no single factor or combination of these factors will necessarily provide a [[Page 74402]] dispositive indication of a successor-in-interest relationship, the Department will generally consider the new company to be the successor to the previous company if the new company's operations are not materially dissimilar to those of its predecessor.\7\ Thus, if the evidence demonstrates that, with respect to the production and sales of the subject merchandise, the new company operates as the same business entity as the former company, the Department will accord the new company the same antidumping treatment as its predecessor.\8\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See, e.g., Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape from Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 75 FR 8925 (February 26, 2010), unchanged in Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 75 FR 27706 (May 18, 2010); and Brake Rotors From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 70 FR 69941 (November 18, 2005) (Brake Rotors), citing Brass Sheet and Strip from Canada; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 57 FR 20460 (May 13, 1992). \7\ See, e.g., Brake Rotors. \8\ Id. See also e.g., Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From India, 77 FR 64953 (October 24, 2012), unchanged in Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From India, 77 FR 73619 (December 11, 2012). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In its review request,\9\ and its response to our supplemental questionnaire,\10\ Sidenor has provided evidence for us to determine preliminarily that it is the successor-in-interest to Gerdau. Sidenor states that its management, production facilities, and customer/ supplier relationships have not changed as a result of the changes in ownership or name of the company.\11\ Sidenor provided corporate structure documentation showing changes to the ownership and name of the company.\12\ Furthermore, Sidenor provided internal documents evidencing that its domestic and overseas customers and suppliers remained the same after the changes, as they were prior to them.\13\ Sidenor provided internal documentation evidencing that its production facilities are the same before and after the changes in ownership and the name change.\14\ Sidenor also provided a list of members of the management team and supporting documentation indicating that Gerdau's managers hold the same positions in Sidenor that they did in Gerdau, with the exception of the replacement of the Human Resources Director.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ See Sidenor Request. \10\ See Sidenor's Letter to the Secretary of Commerce, entitled, ``Stainless Steel Bar from Spain, CCR (Sidenor): Sidenor response to supplemental questions,'' dated October 7, 2016 (SQR). \11\ Id. \12\ See Sidenor Request at Exhibit 1 (the two structures are identical except for the parent), Exhibit 2 (public deed registered in the Central Mercantile Registry reflecting name change), Exhibit 3 (registration of the name change), Exhibits 4-5 (taxpayer identification certificates before and after), and Exhibit 6 (SEC form 6-K filing at note 3 and 4). \13\ See SQR at 3-5, and Exhibit 2 (customers), and at 2-3, and Exhibit 1 (supplier). \14\ See Sidenor Request at 4, and Exhibit 9 (list of production assets). \15\ Id., at 4 and Exhibit 7 (organization charts before, unchanged with one exception after). The administration of the company changed from a Board of Directors to a Sole Administrator. See Sidenor Request at Exhibit 2. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Based on record evidence, we preliminarily determine that Sidenor is the successor-in-interest to Gerdau for purposes of antidumping duty liability because the ownership and name changes of the company resulted in no significant changes to management, production facilities, supplier relationships, and customers. As a result, we preliminarily determine that Sidenor operates as the same business entity as Gerdau. Thus, we preliminarily determine that Sidenor should receive the same antidumping duty cash deposit rate with respect to the subject merchandise as Gerdau, its predecessor company. Because cash deposits are only estimates of the amount of antidumping duties that will be due, changes in cash deposit rates are not made retroactive and, therefore, no change will be made to Sidenor's cash deposit rate as a result of these preliminary results. If Sidenor believes that the deposits paid exceed the actual amount of dumping, it is entitled to request an administrative review during the anniversary month of the publication of the order of those entries, i.e., March, to determine the proper assessment rate and receive a refund of any excess deposits.\16\ As a result, if these preliminary results are adopted in our final results of this changed circumstances review, we will instruct CBP to suspend shipments of subject merchandise made by Sidenor, at Gerdau's cash deposit rate, effective on the publication date of our final results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ See Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismuth Carbon Steel Products From the United Kingdom: Final Results of Changed- Circumstances Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 64 FR 66880 (November 30, 1999). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public Comment Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 14 days after the publication of this notice.\17\ Rebuttal briefs, which must be limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the deadline for filing case briefs.\18\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this changed circumstance review are requested to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities. Interested parties who wish to comment on the preliminary results must file briefs electronically using Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS) and is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov. An electronically-filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the ACCESS no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the date the document is due. Interested parties that wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS, within 14 days of publication of this notice.\19\ Parties will be notified of the time and date of any hearing, if requested.\20\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii). \18\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). \19\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c). See also 19 CFR 351.303 for general filing requirements. \20\ See 19 CFR 351.310. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Notifications to Interested Parties Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e), we intend to issue the final results of this changed circumstances review no later than 270 days after the date on which this review was initiated, or within 45 days after the publication of the preliminary results if all parties in this review agree to our preliminary results. The final results will include the Department's analysis of issues raised in any written comments. This notice of initiation and preliminary results is in accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the Act, 19 CFR 351.216(b) and (d), and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(1). Dated: October 18, 2016. Ronald K. Lorentzen, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016-25906 Filed 10-25-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 26, 2016 / Notices 74401
expenses, U.S. commissions 2 and packing S.A.U., and Gerdau Aceros Especiales The SSB subject to the order is
expenses. For CEP sales, the Department will Europa, S.L., to be Sidenor Aceros currently classifiable under subheadings
subtract the amount of the CEP offset, if Especiales S.L. leaving its operations 7222.10.00, 7222.11.00, 7222.19.00,
warranted, and add in U.S. packing expenses. mostly unchanged.2 Gerdau is a 7222.20.00, 7222.30.00 of the
[FR Doc. 2016–25947 Filed 10–25–16; 8:45 am] respondent in the ongoing Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P administrative review of the United States (HTSUS).
antidumping duty order on SSB from Although the HTSUS subheadings are
Spain covering the period March 1, provided for convenience and customs
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 2015, through February 29, 2016.3 purposes, the written description of the
Because this changed circumstances scope of the order is dispositive.5
International Trade Administration review was requested for an effective
date after the POR of the ongoing Initiation of Changed Circumstances
[A–469–805]
administrative review, it does not have Review
Stainless Steel Bar From Spain: any bearing on that review.4 Citing Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the
Initiation and Preliminary Results of section 751(b) of the Act, and 19 CFR Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act)
Changed Circumstances Review 351.216 Sidenor, requested that the and 19 CFR 351.216(d), the Department
Department initiate a changed will conduct a changed circumstances
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, circumstances review and determine review upon receipt of a request from an
International Trade Administration, that Sidenor Aceros Especiales S.L., is interested party or receipt of
Department of Commerce. the successor-in-interest to Gerdau. information concerning an antidumping
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce Sidenor also requested that the duty order which shows changed
(the Department) is initiating a changed Department issue the initiation and circumstances sufficient to warrant a
circumstances review of the preliminary results as a single notice, review of the order. Based on the
antidumping duty order on stainless pursuant to 19 CFR 351.221(c)(ii). request from Sidenor, and in accordance
steel bar (SSB) from Spain with respect with section 751(b)(1) of Act and 19
to Sidenor Aceros Especiales S.L. Based Scope of the Order
CFR 351.216(b), we are initiating a
on the information on the record, we The merchandise subject to the order changed circumstances review to
preliminarily determine that Sidenor is SSB. The term SSB with respect to the determine whether Sidenor is the
Aceros Especiales S.L. is the successor- order means articles of stainless steel in successor-in-interest to Gerdau. The
in-interest to Gerdau Aceros Especiales straight lengths that have been either Department’s regulations at section
Europa for purposes of determining hot-rolled, forged, turned, cold-drawn, 351.221(c)(3)(ii) instruct that, if we
antidumping duty liability. We invite cold-rolled or otherwise cold-finished, conclude that an expedited action is
interested parties to comment on these or ground, having a uniform solid cross warranted, we may combine the notices
preliminary results. section along their whole length in the of initiation and preliminary results of
DATES: Effective October 26, 2016. shape of circles, segments of circles, a changed circumstances review. In this
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
ovals, rectangles (including squares), instance, because we have the
Michael A. Romani, AD/CVD triangles, hexagons, octagons or other information necessary on the record to
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and convex polygons. SSB includes cold- make a preliminary finding, we find that
Compliance, International Trade finished SSBs that are turned or ground an expedited action is warranted and
Administration, U.S. Department of in straight lengths, whether produced are combining the notices of initiation
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue from hot-rolled bar or from straightened and preliminary results.
NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: and cut rod or wire, and reinforcing bars
that have indentations, ribs, grooves, or Preliminary Results of Expedited
(202) 482–0198. Changed Circumstances Review
other deformations produced during the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
rolling process. Except as specified In making a successor-in-interest
Background above, the term does not include determination, the Department
stainless steel semi-finished products, examines several factors including, but
The Department published the
cut-length flat-rolled products (i.e., cut- not limited to, changes in management,
antidumping duty order on SSB from
length rolled products which if less than production facilities, supplier
Spain on March 2, 1995.1 In its
4.75 mm in thickness have a width relationships, and customer base.6
September 6, 2016, request for a
measuring at least 10 times the While no single factor or combination of
changed circumstances review, Sidenor
thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in these factors will necessarily provide a
Aceros Especiales S.L. (Sidenor),
thickness having a width which exceeds
informed the Department that, effective
150 mm and measures at least twice the 5 The HTSUS numbers provided in the scope
May 20, 2016, the following occurred: changed since the publication of the order. See
thickness), wire (i.e., cold-formed
(1) Gerdau S.A., the Brazilian owner of Amended Final Determination and Antidumping
products in coils, of any uniform solid
Gerdau Holdings Europa S.A.U., Duty Order: Stainless Steel Bar From Spain, 60 FR
cross section along their whole length, 11656 (March 2, 1995).
including its Spanish subsidiary
which do not conform to the definition 6 See, e.g., Pressure Sensitive Plastic Tape from
company Gerdau Aceros Especiales
of flat-rolled products), and angles, Italy: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Europa, S.L. (Gerdau), sold its European Changed Circumstances Review, 75 FR 8925
shapes and sections.
holdings to Clerbil S.L.; and (2) Clerbil
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
(February 26, 2010), unchanged in Pressure
S.L. renamed Gerdau Holdings Europa Sensitive Plastic Tape From Italy: Final Results of
2 See Sidenor’s Letter to the Secretary of
Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review,
S.A.U. to be Sidenor Holdings Europa Commerce, entitled, ‘‘Stainless Steel Bar from 75 FR 27706 (May 18, 2010); and Brake Rotors From
Spain: Sidenor request for changed-circumstances the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
2 If there are not commissions in both markets, review,’’ dated September 22, 2016, (Sidenor Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty
then the Department will apply a commission Request) at 3–6. Administrative Review, 70 FR 69941 (November 18,
offset. See, e.g., 19 C.F.R. § 351.410(e). 3 See Initiation of Antidumping Duty and
2005) (Brake Rotors), citing Brass Sheet and Strip
1 See Amended Final Determination and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 81 FR from Canada; Final Results of Antidumping Duty
Antidumping Duty Order: Stainless Steel Bar From 26203 (May 2, 2016). Administrative Review, 57 FR 20460 (May 13,
Spain, 60 FR 11656 (March 2, 1995). 4 Id. 1992).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:25 Oct 25, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_74608/page/1.svg)
![74402 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 207 / Wednesday, October 26, 2016 / Notices
dispositive indication of a successor-in- replacement of the Human Resources parties who wish to comment on the
interest relationship, the Department Director.15 preliminary results must file briefs
will generally consider the new Based on record evidence, we electronically using Enforcement and
company to be the successor to the preliminarily determine that Sidenor is Compliance’s Antidumping and
previous company if the new company’s the successor-in-interest to Gerdau for Countervailing Duty Centralized
operations are not materially dissimilar purposes of antidumping duty liability Electronic Service System (ACCESS)
to those of its predecessor.7 Thus, if the because the ownership and name and is available to registered users at
evidence demonstrates that, with changes of the company resulted in no http://access.trade.gov. An
respect to the production and sales of significant changes to management, electronically-filed document must be
the subject merchandise, the new production facilities, supplier received successfully in its entirety by
company operates as the same business relationships, and customers. As a the ACCESS no later than 5:00 p.m.
entity as the former company, the result, we preliminarily determine that Eastern Time on the date the document
Department will accord the new Sidenor operates as the same business is due. Interested parties that wish to
company the same antidumping entity as Gerdau. Thus, we preliminarily request a hearing must submit a written
treatment as its predecessor.8 determine that Sidenor should receive request to the Assistant Secretary for
the same antidumping duty cash deposit Enforcement and Compliance, filed
In its review request,9 and its rate with respect to the subject electronically via ACCESS, within 14
response to our supplemental merchandise as Gerdau, its predecessor days of publication of this notice.19
questionnaire,10 Sidenor has provided company. Parties will be notified of the time and
evidence for us to determine Because cash deposits are only date of any hearing, if requested.20
preliminarily that it is the successor-in- estimates of the amount of antidumping
interest to Gerdau. Sidenor states that its duties that will be due, changes in cash Notifications to Interested Parties
management, production facilities, and deposit rates are not made retroactive Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e),
customer/supplier relationships have and, therefore, no change will be made we intend to issue the final results of
not changed as a result of the changes to Sidenor’s cash deposit rate as a result this changed circumstances review no
in ownership or name of the company.11 of these preliminary results. If Sidenor later than 270 days after the date on
Sidenor provided corporate structure believes that the deposits paid exceed which this review was initiated, or
documentation showing changes to the the actual amount of dumping, it is within 45 days after the publication of
ownership and name of the company.12 entitled to request an administrative the preliminary results if all parties in
Furthermore, Sidenor provided internal review during the anniversary month of this review agree to our preliminary
documents evidencing that its domestic the publication of the order of those results. The final results will include
and overseas customers and suppliers entries, i.e., March, to determine the the Department’s analysis of issues
remained the same after the changes, as proper assessment rate and receive a raised in any written comments.
they were prior to them.13 Sidenor refund of any excess deposits.16 As a This notice of initiation and
provided internal documentation result, if these preliminary results are preliminary results is in accordance
evidencing that its production facilities adopted in our final results of this with section 751(b)(1) of the Act, 19
are the same before and after the changed circumstances review, we will CFR 351.216(b) and (d), and 19 CFR
changes in ownership and the name instruct CBP to suspend shipments of 351.221(b)(1).
change.14 Sidenor also provided a list of subject merchandise made by Sidenor,
Dated: October 18, 2016.
members of the management team and at Gerdau’s cash deposit rate, effective
on the publication date of our final Ronald K. Lorentzen,
supporting documentation indicating
results. Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
that Gerdau’s managers hold the same and Compliance.
positions in Sidenor that they did in Public Comment [FR Doc. 2016–25906 Filed 10–25–16; 8:45 am]
Gerdau, with the exception of the
Interested parties may submit case BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
7 See,
briefs no later than 14 days after the
e.g., Brake Rotors.
8 Id. See also e.g., Notice of Initiation and
publication of this notice.17 Rebuttal
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed briefs, which must be limited to issues DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Circumstances Review: Certain Frozen Warmwater raised in case briefs, may be filed not
Shrimp From India, 77 FR 64953 (October 24, later than five days after the deadline for National Oceanic and Atmospheric
2012), unchanged in Final Results of Antidumping
filing case briefs.18 Parties who submit Administration
Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain
Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From India, 77 FR case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this RIN 0648–XE987
73619 (December 11, 2012). changed circumstance review are
9 See Sidenor Request.
requested to submit with each Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management
10 See Sidenor’s Letter to the Secretary of
argument: (1) A statement of the issue; Council (MAFMC); Meeting
Commerce, entitled, ‘‘Stainless Steel Bar from
Spain, CCR (Sidenor): Sidenor response to
(2) a brief summary of the argument; AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries
supplemental questions,’’ dated October 7, 2016 and (3) a table of authorities. Interested Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
(SQR).
11 Id. 15 Id., at 4 and Exhibit 7 (organization charts
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
12 See Sidenor Request at Exhibit 1 (the two before, unchanged with one exception after). The Commerce.
structures are identical except for the parent), administration of the company changed from a ACTION: Notice of public hearing
asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Exhibit 2 (public deed registered in the Central Board of Directors to a Sole Administrator. See meetings.
Mercantile Registry reflecting name change), Sidenor Request at Exhibit 2.
Exhibit 3 (registration of the name change), Exhibits 16 See Certain Hot-Rolled Lead and Bismuth
SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery
4–5 (taxpayer identification certificates before and Carbon Steel Products From the United Kingdom:
after), and Exhibit 6 (SEC form 6–K filing at note Final Results of Changed-Circumstances
Management Council will hold three
3 and 4). Antidumping and Countervailing Duty public hearings in November 2016 to
13 See SQR at 3–5, and Exhibit 2 (customers), and Administrative Reviews, 64 FR 66880 (November
at 2–3, and Exhibit 1 (supplier). 30, 1999). 19 See 19 CFR 351.310(c). See also 19 CFR
14 See Sidenor Request at 4, and Exhibit 9 (list of 17 See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii). 351.303 for general filing requirements.
production assets). 18 See 19 CFR 351.309(d). 20 See 19 CFR 351.310.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:25 Oct 25, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\26OCN1.SGM 26OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_74608/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2016-10-26 02:17:32
Document Modified: 2016-10-26 02:17:32
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective October 26, 2016. | |
| Contact | Michael A. Romani, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0198. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 74401 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR