81 FR 7504 - Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 29 (February 12, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 29 (February 12, 2016)
| Page Range | 7504-7506 | |
| FR Document | 2016-02997 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 29 (Friday, February 12, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 7504-7506] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-02997] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-983] Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks From the People's Republic of China AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is initiating a changed circumstances review (CCR) of the antidumping duty (AD) order on drawn stainless steel sinks from the People's Republic of China (PRC) with regard to Ningbo Afa Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd. (Ningbo). We preliminarily determine that Ningbo is the successor-in-interest to Yuyao Afa Kitchenware Co., Ltd. (Yuyao) for purposes of determining AD liability. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. DATES: Effective Date: February 12, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ross Belliveau or Brian Smith, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4952 or (202) 482-1766. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On April 11, 2013, the Department published in the Federal Register an AD order on drawn stainless steel sinks from the PRC.\1\ On November 19, 2015, Ningbo, a producer/exporter of drawn stainless steel sinks covered by this order, changed its name from Yuyao to Ningbo. On December 22, 2015, Ningbo requested that the Department conduct a changed circumstances review under section 19 U.S.C. 1675(b) and 19 CFR 351.216.\2\ In this request, Ningbo asked the Department to determine that it is the successor-in-interest to Yuyao and, accordingly, to assign it the cash deposit rate of Yuyao.\3\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 78 FR 21592 (April 11, 2013). \2\ See Letter from Ningbo, entitled ``Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China: Request for Changed Circumstances Review by Yuyao Afa Kitchenware Co., Ltd. and Ningbo Afa Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd.,'' dated December 22, 2015 (Ningbo CCR Request). \3\ Id. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order The products covered by the scope of this order are drawn stainless steel sinks with single or multiple drawn bowls, with or without drain boards, whether finished or unfinished, regardless of type of finish, gauge, or grade of stainless steel. Mounting clips, fasteners, seals, and sound-deadening pads are also covered by the scope of this order if they are included within the sales price of the drawn stainless steel sinks. For purposes of this scope definition, the term ``drawn'' refers to a manufacturing process using metal forming technology to produce a smooth basin with seamless, smooth, and rounded corners. Drawn stainless steel sinks are available in various shapes and configurations and may be [[Page 7505]] described in a number of ways including flush mount, top mount, or undermount (to include the attachment relative to the countertop). Stainless steel sinks with multiple drawn bowls that are joined through a welding operation to form one unit are covered by the scope of the order. Drawn stainless steel sinks are covered by the scope of the order whether or not they are sold in conjunction with non-subject accessories such as faucets (whether attached or unattached), strainers, strainer sets, rinsing baskets, bottom grids, or other accessories. Excluded from the scope of the order are stainless steel sinks with fabricated bowls. Fabricated bowls do not have seamless corners, but rather are made by notching and bending the stainless steel, and then welding and finishing the vertical corners to form the bowls. Stainless steel sinks with fabricated bowls may sometimes be referred to as ``zero radius'' or ``near zero radius'' sinks. The products covered by this order are currently classified in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) under statistical reporting number 7324.10.0000 and 7324.10.0010. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope is dispositive. Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review Pursuant to section 751(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act) and 19 CFR 351.216(d), the Department will conduct a CCR upon receipt of a request from an interested party for a review of an AD order which shows changed circumstances sufficient to warrant a review of the order. The information submitted by Ningbo supporting its claim that it is the successor-in-interest to Yuyao demonstrates changed circumstances sufficient to warrant such a review.\4\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ See 19 CFR 351.216(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In accordance with the above-referenced regulation, the Department is initiating a CCR to determine whether Ningbo is the successor-in- interest to Yuyao. When it concludes that expedited action is warranted, the Department may publish the notice of initiation and preliminary results for a CCR concurrently.\5\ We determined that expediting this CCR is warranted because we have the information necessary to make a preliminary finding already on the record, in accordance with our practice.\6\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ See 19 CFR 351.221(c)(3)(ii); see also Certain Pasta From Italy: Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 80 FR 33480, 33480-41 (June 12, 2015) (Pasta From Italy Preliminary Results) (unchanged in Certain Pasta From Italy: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 80 FR 48807 (August 14, 2015) (Pasta From Italy Final Results)). \6\ See, e.g., Pasta From Italy Preliminary Results, 80 FR at 33480-41 (unchanged in Pasta From Italy Final Results, 80 FR at 48807). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In determining whether one company is the successor-in-interest to another, the Department examines a number of factors including, but not limited to, changes in management, production facilities, supplier relationships, and customer base.\7\ While no single factor or combination of these factors will necessarily provide a dispositive indication of a successor-in-interest relationship, the Department will generally consider the new company to be the successor to the previous company if the new company's resulting operation is not materially dissimilar to that of its predecessor.\8\ Thus, if the evidence demonstrates that, with respect to the production and sale of the subject merchandise, the new company operates as the same business entity as the prior company, the Department will assign the new company the cash deposit rate of its predecessor.\9\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See, e.g., Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand, 75 FR 61702, 61703 (October 6, 2010) (Shrimp From Thailand Preliminary Results) (unchanged in Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp From Thailand, 75 FR 74684 (December 1, 2010) (Shrimp From Thailand Final Results)); and Industrial Phosphoric Acid From Israel: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review, 59 FR 6944, 6946 (February 14, 1994). \8\ See, e.g., Shrimp From Thailand Preliminary Results, 75 FR at 61703 (unchanged in Shrimp From Thailand Final Results, 75 FR at 74684). \9\ Id.; see also Notice of Final Results of Changed Circumstances Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Polychloroprene Rubber From Japan, 67 FR 58, 59 (January 2, 2002); and Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France: Final Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, 75 FR 34688, 34689 (June 18, 2010). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- In its December 22, 2015 submission, Ningbo provided information to demonstrate that it is the successor-in-interest to Yuyao. Ningbo states that the company's ownership, location/production facilities, management, and customer base have not changed as a result of the corporate name change. It states further that its suppliers have remained largely the same, with some suppliers added but none eliminated. To support its claims, Ningbo submitted the following documents: (1) A copy of Ningbo's old and new business licenses, issued on June 2, 2015, and November 19, 2015, respectively; \10\ (2) a copy of the government certification and approval of the company's name change from Yuyao to Ningbo; \11\ (3) an excerpt from Yuyao's June 25, 2015, separate rate application documenting the ownership of the company; \12\ (4) an excerpt from Yuyao's June 25, 2015, separate rate application listing the company's management team; \13\ (5) a listing of the company's suppliers before and after its name change.\14\ Ningbo also submitted information pertaining to its location/production facilities and U.S. customer base.\15\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See Ningbo CCR Request at Exhibit 1. \11\ Id. at Exhibit 2. \12\ Id. at Exhibit 3. \13\ Id. at Exhibit 4. \14\ Id. at Exhibit 5. \15\ Id. at 3-4. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Based on the evidence on the record, we preliminarily find that Ningbo is the successor-in-interest to Yuyao. We find that Ningbo operates as the same business entity as Yuyao and that its ownership, management, production facilities, supplier relationships, and customers have not changed as a result of its name change. Thus, we preliminarily find that Ningbo should receive the same antidumping duty cash deposit rate with respect to the subject merchandise as Yuyao, its predecessor company.\16\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \16\ Yuyao received a 4.29 percent dumping margin in the 2012- 2014 administrative review of the AD order on drawn stainless steel sinks from the PRC. See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2014, 80 FR 69644, 69645 (November 10, 2015). We note that Yuyao is also a respondent in the current 2014- 2015 administrative review of this antidumping duty order. See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 30041, 30046 (May 26, 2015). At the conclusion of this CCR, if we determine that Ningbo is the successor-in-interest to Yuyao, we will assign Ningbo an updated cash deposit rate based on the final results of the ongoing review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Should our final results remain the same as these preliminary results, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend entries of subject merchandise exported by Ningbo at Yuyao's cash deposit rate, effective on the publication date of our final results. Public Comment Interested parties may submit case briefs and/or written comments not later than 14 days after the publication of this notice.\17\ Rebuttal briefs, which must be limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be filed not later than five days after the deadline for filing case briefs.\18\ Parties who submit case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this changed [[Page 7506]] circumstances review are requested to submit with each argument: (1) A statement of the issue; (2) a brief summary of the argument; and (3) a table of authorities. Interested parties who wish to comment on the preliminary results must file briefs electronically using Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov. An electronically-filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the Department's electronic records system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern Time on the date the document is due. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \17\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(ii). \18\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Interested parties that wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, filed electronically via ACCESS, within 14 days of publication of this notice.\19\ Parties will be notified of the time and date of any hearing, if requested.\20\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ See 19 CFR 351.310(c); see also 19 CFR 351.303 for general filing requirements. \20\ See 19 CFR 351.310. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e), we intend to issue the final results of this changed circumstance review no later than 270 days after the date on which this review was initiated, or within 45 days of publication of these preliminary results if all parties agree to our preliminary finding. We are issuing and publishing this finding and notice in accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.216 and 351.221(c)(3)(ii). Dated: February 5, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2016-02997 Filed 2-11-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![7504 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 29 / Friday, February 12, 2016 / Notices
review, we will calculate importer- investigation.10 These cash deposit Ningbo Afa Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd.
specific assessment rates on the basis of requirements, when imposed, shall (Ningbo). We preliminarily determine
the ratio of the total amount of dumping remain in effect until further notice. that Ningbo is the successor-in-interest
calculated for an importer’s examined to Yuyao Afa Kitchenware Co., Ltd.
Notification to Importers
sales and the total entered value of such (Yuyao) for purposes of determining AD
sales in accordance with 19 CFR This notice also serves as a liability. Interested parties are invited to
351.212(b)(1). If Haddecilik’s weighted- preliminary reminder to importers of comment on these preliminary results.
average dumping margin is zero or de their responsibility under 19 CFR DATES: Effective Date: February 12,
minimis in the final results of review, or 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 2016.
an importer-specific rate is zero or de regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ross
minimis, we will instruct CBP to
of the relevant entries during this Belliveau or Brian Smith, AD/CVD
liquidate the appropriate entries
review period. Failure to comply with Operations, Office II, Enforcement and
without regard to antidumping duties.
this requirement could result in the Compliance, International Trade
For entries of subject merchandise
Department’s presumption that Administration, U.S. Department of
during the POR produced by the
reimbursement of antidumping duties Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
respondent for which it did not know its
occurred and the subsequent assessment NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
merchandise was destined for the
of double antidumping duties. (202) 482–4952 or (202) 482–1766.
United States, we will instruct CBP to
We are issuing and publishing these SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
liquidate un-reviewed entries at the all-
others rate if there is no rate for the results in accordance with sections Background
intermediate company involved in the 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h)(1). On April 11, 2013, the Department
transaction.9 published in the Federal Register an AD
We intend to issue instructions to Dated: February 5, 2016. order on drawn stainless steel sinks
CBP 15 days after publication of the Paul Piquado, from the PRC.1 On November 19, 2015,
final results of this review. Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Ningbo, a producer/exporter of drawn
Compliance. stainless steel sinks covered by this
Cash Deposit Requirements
Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in order, changed its name from Yuyao to
The following deposit requirements the Preliminary Decision Memorandum Ningbo. On December 22, 2015, Ningbo
will be effective upon publication of the requested that the Department conduct
Summary a changed circumstances review under
notice of final results of administrative Background
review for all shipments of light-walled Scope of the Order
section 19 U.S.C. 1675(b) and 19 CFR
rectangular pipe and tube from Turkey Methodology 351.216.2 In this request, Ningbo asked
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, Fair Value Comparisons the Department to determine that it is
for consumption on or after the date of Product Comparisons the successor-in-interest to Yuyao and,
publication as provided by section Determination of Comparison Method accordingly, to assign it the cash deposit
751(a)(2) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit Date of Sale rate of Yuyao.3
rate for Haddecilik will be the weighted- U.S. Price
Duty Drawback Scope of the Order
average dumping margin established in
Normal Value The products covered by the scope of
the final results of this administrative Currency Conversion
review except if the rate is de minimis this order are drawn stainless steel sinks
Conclusion
within the meaning of 19 CFR with single or multiple drawn bowls,
[FR Doc. 2016–02995 Filed 2–11–16; 8:45 am] with or without drain boards, whether
351.106(c)(1), in which case the cash
deposit rate will be zero; (2) for BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P finished or unfinished, regardless of
merchandise exported by manufacturers type of finish, gauge, or grade of
or exporters not covered in this review stainless steel. Mounting clips,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE fasteners, seals, and sound-deadening
but covered in a prior segment of the
proceeding, the cash deposit rate will pads are also covered by the scope of
International Trade Administration
continue to be the company-specific rate this order if they are included within
published for the most recently [A–570–983] the sales price of the drawn stainless
completed segment of this proceeding in steel sinks. For purposes of this scope
Notice of Initiation and Preliminary definition, the term ‘‘drawn’’ refers to a
which the manufacturer or exporter
Results of Antidumping Duty Changed manufacturing process using metal
participated; (3) if the exporter is not a
Circumstances Review: Drawn forming technology to produce a smooth
firm covered in this review, a prior
Stainless Steel Sinks From the basin with seamless, smooth, and
review, or the original less-than-fair-
People’s Republic of China rounded corners. Drawn stainless steel
value investigation but the manufacturer
is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, sinks are available in various shapes
established for the most recently International Trade Administration, and configurations and may be
completed segment of the proceeding Department of Commerce.
1 See Drawn Stainless Steel Sinks from the
for the manufacturer of the SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce People’s Republic of China: Amended Final
asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES2
merchandise; (4) the cash deposit rate (the Department) is initiating a changed Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
for all other manufacturers or exporters circumstances review (CCR) of the Antidumping Duty Order, 78 FR 21592 (April 11,
will continue to be 27.04 percent ad antidumping duty (AD) order on drawn 2013).
2 See Letter from Ningbo, entitled ‘‘Drawn
valorem, the all-others rate established stainless steel sinks from the People’s Stainless Steel Sinks from the People’s Republic of
in the less-than-fair-value Republic of China (PRC) with regard to China: Request for Changed Circumstances Review
by Yuyao Afa Kitchenware Co., Ltd. and Ningbo Afa
9 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 10 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Order: Light- Kitchen and Bath Co., Ltd.,’’ dated December 22,
Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From Turkey, 73 2015 (Ningbo CCR Request).
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). FR 31065 (May 30, 2008). 3 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:38 Feb 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\12FEN1.SGM 12FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_7533/page/1.svg)
![7506 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 29 / Friday, February 12, 2016 / Notices
circumstances review are requested to for Improving Critical Infrastructure Enhancement Act of 2014 1 to ‘‘facilitate
submit with each argument: (1) A Cybersecurity’’ (the ‘‘Framework’’) and support the development of a
statement of the issue; (2) a brief through February 23, 2016. In a Request voluntary, consensus-based, industry-
summary of the argument; and (3) a for Information (RFI) that published in led set of standards, guidelines, best
table of authorities. Interested parties the Federal Register on December 11, practices, methodologies, procedures,
who wish to comment on the 2015 (80 FR 76934), NIST requested and processes to cost-effectively reduce
preliminary results must file briefs information about the variety of ways in cyber risks to critical infrastructure.’’ 2
electronically using Enforcement and which the Framework is being used to Executive Order 13636, ‘‘Improving
Compliance’s Antidumping and improve cybersecurity risk management, Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity’’ 3
Countervailing Duty Centralized how best practices for using the tasked the Secretary of Commerce to
Electronic Service System (ACCESS). Framework are being shared, the direct the Director of NIST to lead the
ACCESS is available to registered users relative value of different parts of the development of a framework to reduce
at http://access.trade.gov. An Framework, the possible need for an
cyber risks to critical infrastructure. A
electronically-filed document must be update of the Framework, and options
final version of Framework 1.0 was
received successfully in its entirety by for the long-term governance of the
the Department’s electronic records Framework. NIST is extending the published on February 12, 2014, after a
system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern comment period announced in the year-long, open process involving
Time on the date the document is due. December 11, 2015 RFI from February 9, private and public sector organizations,
Interested parties that wish to request 2016 to February 23, 2016. including extensive industry input and
a hearing must submit a written request public comments, and announced in the
DATES: Comments must be received by Federal Register (79 FR 9167) on
to the Assistant Secretary for
5:00 p.m. Eastern time on February 23, February 18, 2014. On December 11,
Enforcement and Compliance, filed
2016. Comments received after February 2015 NIST published a RFI in the
electronically via ACCESS, within 14
9, 2016 and before publication of this
days of publication of this notice.19 Federal Register (80 FR 76934) seeking
notice are deemed to be timely.
Parties will be notified of the time and information about the variety of ways in
date of any hearing, if requested.20 ADDRESSES: Written comments may be which the Framework is being used to
Consistent with 19 CFR 351.216(e), submitted by mail to Diane Honeycutt, improve cybersecurity risk management,
we intend to issue the final results of National Institute of Standards and how best practices for using the
this changed circumstance review no Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Stop Framework are being shared, the
later than 270 days after the date on 8930, Gaithersburg, MD 20899. Online relative value of different parts of the
which this review was initiated, or submissions in electronic form may be Framework, the possible need for an
within 45 days of publication of these sent to cyberframework@nist.gov in any update of the Framework, and options
preliminary results if all parties agree to of the following formats: HTML; ASCII; for the long-term governance of the
our preliminary finding. Word; RTF; or PDF. Please include your
Framework. NIST is extending the
We are issuing and publishing this name and your organization’s name (if
finding and notice in accordance with comment period announced in the
any), and cite ‘‘Views on the Framework
sections 751(b)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the for Improving Critical Infrastructure December 11, 2015 RFI from February 9,
Act, and 19 CFR 351.216 and Cybersecurity’’ in all correspondence. 2016 to February 23, 2016 to allow
351.221(c)(3)(ii). Comments containing references, comments to be submitted during a
studies, research, and other empirical timeframe in which a variety of
Dated: February 5, 2016.
data that are not widely published cybersecurity events are scheduled to
Paul Piquado,
should include copies of the referenced occur.
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance. materials. Please do not submit Kevin Kimball,
additional materials.
[FR Doc. 2016–02997 Filed 2–11–16; 8:45 am] Chief of Staff.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
All comments received in response to [FR Doc. 2016–02860 Filed 2–11–16; 8:45 am]
this RFI will be posted at http://www.
BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
nist.gov/cyberframework/cybersecurity-
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE framework-rfi.cfm without change or
redaction, so commenters should not
National Institute of Standards and include information they do not wish to
Technology be posted (e.g., personal or confidential
[Docket Number 151103999–6076–02]
business information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
Views on the Framework for Improving questions about this RFI contact: Diane 1 Public Law 113–274 (2014): http://www.gpo.
Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity Honeycutt, National Institute of gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-113publ274/pdf/PLAW-
AGENCY: National Institute of Standards Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau 113publ274.pdf
and Technology, Commerce. Drive, Stop 8930, Gaithersburg, MD 2 Id., codified in relevant part at 15 U.S.C.
20899 or cyberframework@nist.gov. 272(c)(15). Congress’s intent was to codify NIST’s
ACTION: Notice; extension of comment
Please direct media inquiries to NIST’s role in Executive Order No. 13636: ‘‘Title I would
period.
asabaliauskas on DSK9F6TC42PROD with NOTICES2
Office of Public Affairs at (301) 975– codify certain elements of Executive Order 13636
2762. by directing the National Institute of Standards and
SUMMARY: The National Institute of Technology (NIST) to develop a framework of
Standards and Technology (NIST) is voluntary standards designed to reduce risks arising
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NIST is
extending the period for submitting from cyberattacks on critical infrastructure that is
extending the comment period
comments relating to the ‘‘Framework privately owned and operated.’’ S. Rep. No. 113–
announced in the December 11, 2015 270, at 9 (2014).
19 See 19 CFR 351.310(c); see also 19 CFR 351.303
Request for Information (RFI) (80 FR 3 Exec. Order No. 13636, Improving Critical
for general filing requirements. 76934) through February 23, 2016. NIST Infrastructure Cybersecurity, 78 FR 11739 (Feb. 19,
20 See 19 CFR 351.310. is authorized by the Cybersecurity 2013).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:38 Feb 11, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\12FEN1.SGM 12FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_7533/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-02-12 01:24:24
Document Modified: 2016-02-12 01:24:24
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Contact | Ross Belliveau or Brian Smith, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4952 or (202) 482-1766. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 7504 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR