81 FR 75147 - Exemptions From Certain Prohibited Transaction Restrictions
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employee Benefits Security Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 209 (October 28, 2016)
Employee Benefits Security Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 209 (October 28, 2016)
| Page Range | 75147-75157 | |
| FR Document | 2016-26089 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 209 (Friday, October 28, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 75147-75157] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-26089] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Employee Benefits Security Administration Exemptions From Certain Prohibited Transaction Restrictions AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security Administration, Labor. ACTION: Grant of individual exemptions. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This document contains exemptions issued by the Department of Labor (the Department) from certain of the prohibited transaction restrictions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act) and/or the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code). This notice includes the following: 2016-10, Royal Bank of Canada, D- 11868; 2016-11, Northern Trust Corporation, D-11875; and, 2016-12, Extension of PTE 2015-15 involving Deutsche Bank AG, D-11879. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice was published in the Federal Register of the pendency before the Department of a proposal to grant such exemption. The notice set forth a summary of facts and representations contained in the application for exemption and referred interested persons to the application for a complete statement of the facts and representations. The application has been available for public inspection at the Department in Washington, DC. The notice also invited interested persons to submit comments on the requested exemption to the Department. In addition the notice stated that any interested person might submit a written request that a public hearing be held (where appropriate). The applicant has represented that it has complied with the requirements of the notification to interested persons. No requests for a hearing were received by the Department. Public comments were received by the Department as described in the granted exemption. The notice of proposed exemption was issued and the exemption is being granted solely by the Department because, effective December 31, 1978, section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. 4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996), transferred the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to issue exemptions of the type proposed to the Secretary of Labor. Statutory Findings In accordance with section 408(a) of the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code and the procedures set forth in 29 CFR part 2570, subpart B (76 FR 66637, 66644, October 27, 2011) \1\ and based upon the entire record, the Department makes the following findings: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ The Department has considered exemption applications received prior to December 27, 2011 under the exemption procedures set forth in 29 CFR part 2570, subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August 10, 1990). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (a) The exemption is administratively feasible; (b) The exemption is in the interests of the plan and its participants and beneficiaries; and (c) The exemption is protective of the rights of the participants and beneficiaries of the plan. Royal Bank of Canada (Together With Its Current and Future Affiliates, RBC or the Applicant), Located in Toronto, Ontario, Canada [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2016-10; Exemption Application No. D- 11868] Temporary Exemption Section I--Covered Transactions Certain entities with specified relationships to Royal Bank of Canada Trust Company (Bahamas) Limited (RBCTC Bahamas) (hereinafter, the RBC QPAMs, as further defined in Section II(b)) will not be precluded from relying on the exemptive relief provided by Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-14,\2\ notwithstanding a judgment of conviction against RBCTC Bahamas for aiding and abetting tax fraud, to be entered in France in the District Court of Paris (the Conviction, as further defined in Section II(a)),\3\ for a period of up to twelve months beginning on the date of the Conviction (the Conviction Date), provided that the following conditions are satisfied: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ 49 FR 9494 (March 13, 1984), as corrected at 50 FR 41430 (October 10, 1985), as amended at 70 FR 49305 (August 23, 2005), and as amended at 75 FR 38837 (July 6, 2010). \3\ Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 generally provides that ``[n]either the QPAM nor any affiliate thereof . . . nor any owner . . . of a 5 percent or more interest in the QPAM is a person who within the 10 years immediately preceding the transaction has been either convicted or released from imprisonment, whichever is later, as a result of'' certain felonies including income tax evasion, and aiding and abetting tax evasion. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (a) The RBC QPAMs (including their officers, directors, agents other than RBC, and employees of such RBC QPAMs) did not know of, have reason to know of, or participate in the criminal conduct of RBCTC Bahamas that is the subject of the Conviction (for purposes of this paragraph (a), ``participate in'' includes the knowing or tacit approval of the misconduct underlying the Conviction); (b) The RBC QPAMs (including their officers, directors, agents other than RBC, and employees of such RBC [[Page 75148]] QPAMs) did not receive direct compensation, or knowingly receive indirect compensation, in connection with the criminal conduct that is the subject of the Conviction; (c) The RBC QPAMs will not employ or knowingly engage any of the individuals that participated in the criminal conduct that is the subject of the Conviction (for purposes of this paragraph (c), ``participated in'' includes the knowing or tacit approval of the misconduct underlying the Conviction); (d) An RBC QPAM will not use its authority or influence to direct an ``investment fund,'' (as defined in Section VI(b) of PTE 84-14) that is subject to ERISA or the Code and managed by such RBC QPAM, to enter into any transaction with RBCTC Bahamas or engage RBCTC Bahamas to provide any service to such investment fund, for a direct or indirect fee borne by such investment fund, regardless of whether such transaction or service may otherwise be within the scope of relief provided by an administrative or statutory exemption; (e) Any failure of the RBC QPAMs to satisfy Section I(g) of PTE 84- 14 arose solely from the Conviction; (f) The criminal conduct that is the subject of the Conviction did not directly or indirectly involve the assets of any plan subject to Part 4 of Title I of ERISA (an ERISA-covered plan) or section 4975 of the Code (an IRA); (g) RBCTC Bahamas has not provided nor will provide discretionary asset management services to ERISA-covered plans or IRAs, nor will it otherwise act as a fiduciary with respect to ERISA-covered plan and IRA assets; (h)(1) Within four months of the date of the Conviction, each RBC QPAM must develop, implement, maintain, and follow written policies (the Policies) requiring and reasonably designed to ensure that: (i) The asset management decisions of the RBC QPAM are conducted independently of the management and business activities of RBCTC Bahamas; (ii) The RBC QPAM fully complies with ERISA's fiduciary duties and with ERISA and the Code's prohibited transaction provisions, and does not knowingly participate in any violations of these duties and provisions with respect to ERISA-covered plans and IRAs; (iii) The RBC QPAM does not knowingly participate in any other person's violation of ERISA or the Code with respect to ERISA-covered plans and IRAs; (iv) Any filings or statements made by the RBC QPAM to regulators, including but not limited to, the Department of Labor, the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Justice, and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, on behalf of ERISA-covered plans or IRAs are materially accurate and complete, to the best of such QPAM's knowledge at that time; (v) The RBC QPAM does not make material misrepresentations or omit material information in its communications with such regulators with respect to ERISA-covered plans or IRAs, or make material misrepresentations or omit material information in its communications with ERISA-covered plan and IRA clients; (vi) The RBC QPAM complies with the terms of this temporary exemption; and (vii) Any violation of, or failure to comply with, an item in subparagraph (ii) through (vi), is corrected promptly upon discovery, and any such violation or compliance failure not promptly corrected is reported, upon discovering the failure to promptly correct, in writing, to appropriate corporate officers, the head of compliance and the General Counsel (or their functional equivalent) of the relevant RBC QPAM, and an appropriate fiduciary of any affected ERISA-covered plan or IRA where such fiduciary is independent of RBC; however, with respect to any ERISA-covered plan or IRA sponsored by an ``affiliate'' (as defined in Section VI(d) of PTE 84-14) of RBC or beneficially owned by an employee of RBC or its affiliates, such fiduciary does not need to be independent of RBC. An RBC QPAM will not be treated as having failed to develop, implement, maintain, or follow the Policies, provided that it corrects any instance of noncompliance promptly when discovered or when it reasonably should have known of the noncompliance (whichever is earlier), and provided that it adheres to the reporting requirements set forth in this subparagraph (vii); (2) Within four months of the date of the Conviction, each RBC QPAM must develop and implement a program of training (the Training), conducted at least annually, for all relevant RBC QPAM asset/portfolio management, trading, legal, compliance, and internal audit personnel. The Training must be set forth in the Policies and at a minimum, cover the Policies, ERISA and Code compliance (including applicable fiduciary duties and the prohibited transaction provisions), ethical conduct, the consequences for not complying with the conditions of this temporary exemption (including any loss of exemptive relief provided herein), and prompt reporting of wrongdoing; (i) Effective as of the effective date of this temporary exemption, with respect to any arrangement, agreement, or contract between an RBC QPAM and an ERISA-covered plan or IRA for which an RBC QPAM provides asset management or other discretionary fiduciary services, each RBC QPAM agrees: (1) To comply with ERISA and the Code, as applicable with respect to such ERISA-covered plan or IRA; to refrain from engaging in prohibited transactions that are not otherwise exempt (and to promptly correct any inadvertent prohibited transactions); and to comply with the standards of prudence and loyalty set forth in section 404 of ERISA with respect to each such ERISA-covered plan and IRA; (2) Not to require (or otherwise cause) the ERISA-covered plan or IRA to waive, limit, or qualify the liability of the RBC QPAM for violating ERISA or the Code or engaging in prohibited transactions; (3) Not to require the ERISA-covered plan or IRA (or sponsor of such ERISA-covered plan or beneficial owner of such IRA) to indemnify the RBC QPAM for violating ERISA or engaging in prohibited transactions, except for violations or prohibited transactions caused by an error, misrepresentation, or misconduct of a plan fiduciary or other party hired by the plan fiduciary who is independent of RBC; (4) Not to restrict the ability of such ERISA-covered plan or IRA to terminate or withdraw from its arrangement with the RBC QPAM (including any investment in a separately managed account or pooled fund subject to ERISA and managed by such QPAM), with the exception of reasonable restrictions, appropriately disclosed in advance, that are specifically designed to ensure equitable treatment of all investors in a pooled fund in the event such withdrawal or termination may have adverse consequences for all other investors as a result of an actual lack of liquidity of the underlying assets, provided that such restrictions are applied consistently and in like manner to all such investors; (5) Not to impose any fees, penalties, or charges for such termination or withdrawal with the exception of reasonable fees, appropriately disclosed in advance, that are specifically designed to prevent generally recognized abusive investment practices or specifically designed to ensure equitable treatment of all investors in a pooled fund in the event such withdrawal or termination may have adverse consequences for all other [[Page 75149]] investors, provided that such fees are applied consistently and in like manner to all such investors; (6) Not to include exculpatory provisions disclaiming or otherwise limiting liability of the RBC QPAM for a violation of such agreement's terms, except for liability caused by an error, misrepresentation, or misconduct of a plan fiduciary or other party hired by the plan fiduciary who is independent of RBC; and (7) To indemnify and hold harmless the ERISA-covered plan or IRA for any damages resulting from a violation of applicable laws, a breach of contract, or any claim arising out of the failure of such RBC QPAM to qualify for the exemptive relief provided by PTE 84-14 as a result of a violation of Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 other than the Conviction. Within six (6) months of the date of the Conviction, each RBC QPAM will: Provide a notice of its obligations under this Section I(i) to each ERISA-covered plan and IRA for which an RBC QPAM provides asset management or other discretionary fiduciary services; (j) The RBC QPAMs comply with each condition of PTE 84-14, as amended, with the sole exceptions of the violations of Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 that are attributable to the Conviction; (k) Each RBC QPAM will maintain records necessary to demonstrate that the conditions of this temporary exemption have been met, for six (6) years following the date of any transaction for which such RBC QPAM relies upon the relief in the temporary exemption; (l) During the effective period of this temporary exemption, RBC: (1) Immediately discloses to the Department any Deferred Prosecution Agreement (a DPA) or Non-Prosecution Agreement (an NPA) that RBC or an affiliate enters into with the U.S Department of Justice, to the extent such DPA or NPA involves conduct described in Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 or section 411 of ERISA; and (2) immediately provides the Department any information requested by the Department, as permitted by law, regarding the agreement and/or the conduct and allegations that led to the agreements; and (m) An RBC QPAM will not fail to meet the terms of this temporary exemption, solely because a different RBC QPAM fails to satisfy a condition for relief under this temporary exemption, described in Sections I(c), (d), (h), (i), (j), and (k). Section II--Definitions (a) The term ``Conviction'' means the potential judgment of conviction against RBCTC Bahamas for aiding and abetting tax fraud to be entered in France in the District Court of Paris, French Special Prosecutor No. 1120392066, French Investigative Judge No. JIRSIF/11/12; (b) The term ``RBC QPAM'' means a ``qualified professional asset manager'' (as defined in section VI(a) \4\ of PTE 84-14) that relies on the relief provided by PTE 84-14 and with respect to which RBCTC Bahamas is a current or future ``affiliate'' (as defined in section VI(d) of PTE 84-14); --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ In general terms, a QPAM is an independent fiduciary that is a bank, savings and loan association, insurance company, or investment adviser that meets certain equity or net worth requirements and other licensure requirements and that has acknowledged in a written management agreement that it is a fiduciary with respect to each plan that has retained the QPAM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (c) The term ``RBCTC Bahamas'' means Royal Bank of Canada Trust Company (Bahamas) Limited, a Bahamian ``affiliate'' of RBC (as defined in section VI(c) of PTE 84-14); (d) The terms ``ERISA-covered plan'' and ``IRA'' mean, respectively, a plan subject to Part 4 of Title I of ERISA and a plan subject to section 4975 of the Code; and (e) The term ``RBC'' means Royal Bank of Canada, together with its current and future affiliates. Effective Date: This temporary exemption is effective for the period beginning on the Conviction Date until the earlier of: The date that is twelve months following the Conviction Date; or the effective date of a final agency action made by the Department in connection with an application for long-term exemptive relief for the covered transactions described herein. Supplementary Information On October 12, 2016, the Department of Labor (the Department) published a notice of proposed temporary exemption in the Federal Register at 81 FR 70562, proposing that certain entities with specified relationships to RBCTC Bahamas could continue to rely upon the relief provided by PTE 84-14 (49 FR 9494 (March 13, 1984), as corrected at 50 FR 41430 (October 10, 1985), as amended at 70 FR 49305 (August 23, 2005), and as amended at 75 FR 38837 (July 6, 2010)), notwithstanding a judgment of conviction against RBCTC Bahamas for aiding and abetting tax fraud, to be entered in France in the District Court of Paris (the Conviction, as further defined in Section II(a)),\5\ for a period of up to twelve months beginning on the date of the Conviction. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 generally provides that ``[n]either the QPAM nor any affiliate thereof . . . nor any owner . . . of a 5 percent or more interest in the QPAM is a person who within the 10 years immediately preceding the transaction has been either convicted or released from imprisonment, whichever is later, as a result of'' certain felonies including income tax evasion, and aiding and abetting tax evasion. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department is today granting this temporary exemption in order to protect ERISA-covered plans and IRAs from certain costs and/or investment losses that may arise to the extent entities with a corporate relationship to RBCTC Bahamas lose their ability to rely on PTE 84-14 as of the Conviction Date, as described in the proposed temporary exemption. The Department is considering proposing longer- term relief for RBC QPAMs to rely on PTE 84-14 notwithstanding the Conviction, in Application No. D-11912. The relief in this temporary exemption provides the Department more time to consider whether longer- term relief is warranted. No relief from a violation of any other law is provided by this temporary exemption, including any criminal conviction described in the proposed temporary exemption. Furthermore, the Department cautions that the relief in this temporary exemption will terminate immediately if, among other things, an entity within the RBC corporate structure is convicted of a crime described in Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 (other than the Conviction) during the effective period of the temporary exemption. While such an entity could apply for a new exemption in that circumstance, the Department would not be obligated to grant the exemption. The terms of this temporary exemption have been specifically designed to permit plans to terminate their relationships in an orderly and cost effective fashion in the event of an additional conviction or a determination that it is otherwise prudent for a plan to terminate its relationship with an entity covered by the temporary exemption. Written Comments The Department invited all interested persons to submit written comments and/or requests for a public hearing with respect to the notice of proposed temporary exemption, published on October 12, 2016. All comments and requests for hearing were due by October 19, 2016. During the comment period, the Department received written comments from RBC and from The Clearing House. Although the Department has, for the most part, revised the proposed temporary exemption in the manner requested by RBC, the Department cautions that it may decline to include those revisions in any decision to grant more permanent relief. [[Page 75150]] RBC's Comment RBC seeks several revisions to the conditions set forth in the proposed temporary exemption. First, RBC states that Section I(f) of the proposed temporary exemption may be unintentionally broad. As proposed, that condition states: ``No entities holding assets that constitute the assets of any plan subject to Part 4 of Title I of ERISA (an ERISA-covered plan) or section 4975 of the Code (an IRA) were involved in the criminal conduct that is the subject of the Conviction.'' RBC seeks to revise the condition to read: ``The criminal conduct that is the subject of the Conviction did not directly or indirectly involve the assets of any plan subject to Part 4 of Title I of ERISA (an ERISA-covered plan) or section 4975 of the Code (an IRA).'' The Department has decided to revise the condition in the manner requested by RBC. Next, RBC notes that Section I(h) of the proposed temporary exemption requires that each RBC QPAM ``immediately:'' Develop, implement, maintain and follow certain written policies; and develop and implement a program of training. RBC seeks a period of up to four months following the date of its impending conviction to meet these requirements. The Department agrees that four months is a reasonable period of time with which to comply with the requirement of Section I(h) and has revised the condition accordingly. RBC seeks another change to Section I(h)(1)(i), through the deletion of the bolded language, ``The asset management decisions of the RBC QPAM are conducted independently of the management and business activities of RBC, including RBCTC Bahamas. RBC represents that it has neither committed, nor been accused of committing, a crime. The Department has revised the condition accordingly. RBC also seeks to change the start date of the notice requirement set forth in Section I(i), such that each RBC must provide such notice within six months of the Conviction Date, rather than within six months of the date of publication of this granted temporary exemption. The Department concurs with this request, and has revised the temporary exemption accordingly. RBC seeks deletion of the requirement in Section I(i) that requires each RBC QPAM to separately warrant in writing its obligations to ERISA-Covered Plans and IRAs. While the Department has made such revision for purposes of the limited relief herein, the Department re- emphasizes, as noted above, that it may decide to propose more permanent relief that does not contain this revision. RBC seeks deletion of requirement set forth in Section I(i)(6) that, each RBC QPAM agrees: ``Not to include exculpatory provisions disclaiming or otherwise limiting liability of the RBC QPAM for a violation of such agreement's terms.'' The Department declines to make such deletion, but has revised the condition to read: ``Not to include exculpatory provisions disclaiming or otherwise limiting liability of the RBC QPAM for a violation of such agreement's terms, except for liability caused by an error, misrepresentation, or misconduct of a plan fiduciary or other party hired by the plan fiduciary who is independent of RBC.'' RBC notes that, in addition to the asset managers identified in the proposed exemption, the following managers are owned in whole or in part by RBC: BlueBay Asset Management USA, LLC; City National Bank; City National Rochdale, LLC; City National Securities, Inc.; Convergent Wealth Advisors, LLC; LMCG Investments, LLC; Mid-Continent Capital, L.L.C.; and Symphonic Financial Advisors LLC be added to the list of primary U.S. bank and U.S. registered adviser affiliates in which RBC owns a significant interest. Three additional managers are owned in part but not currently controlled by RBC: Matthews International Capital Management, LLC; SKBA Capital Management, LLC; and O'Shaughnessy Asset Management, LLC. Further, RBC believes that Footnote 16 of the proposed exemption implies that the Hong Kong investigation is connected to RBCTC Bahamas' alleged conduct that is the subject of the French prosecution described in Section II(a) of the proposal. According to RBC, the Hong Kong investigation is entirely unrelated to the matter that is the subject of the French prosecution described in Section II(a). Condition (l) set forth in the proposed exemption provided that during the effective period of this temporary exemption, neither RBC nor any affiliate enters into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (a DPA) or a Non-Prosecution Agreement (an NPA) with the U.S Department of Justice, in connection with conduct described in Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 or section 411 of ERISA. RBC sought to reserve its right to comment on this condition in connection with the Department's consideration of more permanent relief. The Department has nonetheless revised condition (l) such that it now reads: During the effective period of this temporary exemption, RBC: (1) Immediately discloses to the Department any Deferred Prosecution Agreement (a DPA) or Non- Prosecution Agreement (an NPA) that RBC or an affiliate enters into with the U.S Department of Justice, to the extent such DPA or NPA involves conduct described in Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 or section 411 of ERISA; and (2) immediately provides the Department any information requested by the Department, as permitted by law, regarding the agreement and/or the conduct and allegations that led to the agreements. The Clearing House Comment The Clearing House Association L.L.C. (TCH) submitted a comment that expresses concern regarding condition (l) in Section I of the proposed temporary exemption. As noted above, the Department has revised that condition. The Department will continue to consider TCH's comment in connection with its consideration of more permanent relief for RBC. After giving full consideration to the record, the Department has decided to grant the temporary exemption, as described above. The complete application file (Application No. D-11868) is available for public inspection in the Public Disclosure Room of the Employee Benefits Security Administration, Room N-1515, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. For a more complete statement of the facts and representations supporting the Department's decision to grant this temporary exemption, refer to the notice of proposed temporary exemption published on October 12, 2016 at 81 FR 70562. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Anna Mpras Vaughan of the Department, telephone (202) 693-8565. (This is not a toll-free number.) Northern Trust Corporation (Together With Its Current and Future Affiliates, Northern or the Applicant), Located in Chicago, Illinois [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2016-11; Exemption Application No. D- 11875] Temporary Exemption Section I--Covered Transactions Certain entities with specified relationships to Northern Trust Fiduciary Services (Guernsey) ltd. (NTFS) (hereinafter, the Northern QPAMs, as further defined in Section II(b)) will not be precluded from relying on the exemptive relief provided by Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84- [[Page 75151]] 14 (PTE) 84-14,\6\ notwithstanding a judgment of conviction against NTFS for aiding and abetting tax fraud, to be entered in France in the District Court of Paris (the Conviction, as further defined in Section II(a)),\7\ for a period of up to twelve months beginning on the date of the Conviction (the Conviction Date), provided that the following conditions are satisfied: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ 49 FR 9494 (March 13, 1984), as corrected at 50 FR 41430 (October 10, 1985), as amended at 70 FR 49305 (August 23, 2005), and as amended at 75 FR 38837 (July 6, 2010). \7\ Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 generally provides that ``[n]either the QPAM nor any affiliate thereof . . . nor any owner . . . of a 5 percent or more interest in the QPAM is a person who within the 10 years immediately preceding the transaction has been either convicted or released from imprisonment, whichever is later, as a result of'' certain felonies including income tax evasion, and aiding and abetting tax evasion. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (a) The Northern QPAMs (including their officers, directors, agents other than Northern, and employees of such Northern QPAMs) did not know of, have reason to know of, or participate in the criminal conduct of NTFS that is the subject of the Conviction (for purposes of this paragraph (a), ``participate in'' includes the knowing or tacit approval of the misconduct underlying the Conviction); (b) The Northern QPAMs (including their officers, directors, agents other than Northern, and employees of such Northern QPAMs) did not receive direct compensation, or knowingly receive indirect compensation, in connection with the criminal conduct that is the subject of the Conviction; (c) The Northern QPAMs will not employ or knowingly engage any of the individuals that participated in the criminal conduct that is the subject of the Conviction (for purposes of this paragraph (c), ``participated in'' includes the knowing or tacit approval of the misconduct underlying the Conviction); (d) A Northern QPAM will not use its authority or influence to direct an ``investment fund,'' (as defined in Section VI(b) of PTE 84- 14) that is subject to ERISA or the Code and managed by such Northern QPAM, to enter into any transaction with NTFS or engage NTFS to provide any service to such investment fund, for a direct or indirect fee borne by such investment fund, regardless of whether such transaction or service may otherwise be within the scope of relief provided by an administrative or statutory exemption; (e) Any failure of the Northern QPAMs to satisfy Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 arose solely from the Conviction; (f) No entities holding assets that constitute the assets of any plan subject to Part 4 of Title I of ERISA (an ERISA-covered plan) or section 4975 of the Code (an IRA) were involved in the criminal conduct that is the subject of the Conviction; (g) NTFS has not provided nor will provide discretionary asset management services to ERISA-covered plans or IRAs, nor will it otherwise act as a fiduciary with respect to ERISA-covered plan and IRA assets; (h)(1) Within four months of the date of the Conviction, each Northern QPAM must develop, implement, maintain, and follow written policies (the Policies) requiring and reasonably designed to ensure that: (i) The asset management decisions of the Northern QPAM are conducted independently of the management and business activities of NTFS; (ii) The Northern QPAM fully complies with ERISA's fiduciary duties and with ERISA and the Code's prohibited transaction provisions, and does not knowingly participate in any violations of these duties and provisions with respect to ERISA-covered plans and IRAs; (iii) The Northern QPAM does not knowingly participate in any other person's violation of ERISA or the Code with respect to ERISA-covered plans and IRAs; (iv) Any filings or statements made by the Northern QPAM to regulators, including but not limited to, the Department of Labor, the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Justice, and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, on behalf of ERISA-covered plans or IRAs are materially accurate and complete, to the best of such QPAM's knowledge at that time; (v) The Northern QPAM does not make material misrepresentations or omit material information in its communications with such regulators with respect to ERISA-covered plans or IRAs, or make material misrepresentations or omit material information in its communications with ERISA-covered plan and IRA clients; (vi) The Northern QPAM complies with the terms of this temporary exemption; and (vii) Any violation of, or failure to comply with, an item in subparagraph (ii) through (vi), is corrected promptly upon discovery, and any such violation or compliance failure not promptly corrected is reported, upon discovering the failure to promptly correct, in writing, to appropriate corporate officers, the head of compliance and the General Counsel (or their functional equivalent) of the relevant Northern QPAM, and an appropriate fiduciary of any affected ERISA- covered plan or IRA where such fiduciary is independent of Northern; however, with respect to any ERISA-covered plan or IRA sponsored by an ``affiliate'' (as defined in Section VI(d) of PTE 84-14) of Northern or beneficially owned by an employee of Northern or its affiliates, such fiduciary does not need to be independent of Northern. A Northern QPAM will not be treated as having failed to develop, implement, maintain, or follow the Policies, provided that it corrects any instance of noncompliance promptly when discovered or when it reasonably should have known of the noncompliance (whichever is earlier), and provided that it adheres to the reporting requirements set forth in this subparagraph (vii); (2) Within four months of the date of the Conviction, Northern QPAM must develop and implement a program of training (the Training), conducted at least annually, for all relevant Northern QPAM asset/ portfolio management, trading, legal, compliance, and internal audit personnel. The Training must be set forth in the Policies and at a minimum, cover the Policies, ERISA and Code compliance (including applicable fiduciary duties and the prohibited transaction provisions), ethical conduct, the consequences for not complying with the conditions of this temporary exemption (including any loss of exemptive relief provided herein), and prompt reporting of wrongdoing; (i) Effective as of the effective date of this temporary exemption, with respect to any arrangement, agreement, or contract between a Northern QPAM and an ERISA-covered plan or IRA for which a Northern QPAM provides asset management or other discretionary fiduciary services, each Northern QPAM agrees: (1) To comply with ERISA and the Code, as applicable with respect to such ERISA-covered plan or IRA; to refrain from engaging in prohibited transactions that are not otherwise exempt (and to promptly correct any inadvertent prohibited transactions); and to comply with the standards of prudence and loyalty set forth in section 404 of ERISA with respect to each such ERISA-covered plan and IRA; (2) Not to require (or otherwise cause) the ERISA-covered plan or IRA to waive, limit, or qualify the liability of the Northern QPAM for violating ERISA or the Code or engaging in prohibited transactions; (3) Not to require the ERISA-covered plan or IRA (or sponsor of such ERISA-covered plan or beneficial owner of [[Page 75152]] such IRA) to indemnify the Northern QPAM for violating ERISA or engaging in prohibited transactions, except for violations or prohibited transactions caused by an error, misrepresentation, or misconduct of a plan fiduciary or other party hired by the plan fiduciary who is independent of Northern; (4) Not to restrict the ability of such ERISA-covered plan or IRA to terminate or withdraw from its arrangement with the Northern QPAM (including any investment in a separately managed account or pooled fund subject to ERISA and managed by such QPAM), with the exception of reasonable restrictions, appropriately disclosed in advance, that are specifically designed to ensure equitable treatment of all investors in a pooled fund in the event such withdrawal or termination may have adverse consequences for all other investors as a result of an actual lack of liquidity of the underlying assets, provided that such restrictions are applied consistently and in like manner to all such investors; (5) Not to impose any fees, penalties, or charges for such termination or withdrawal with the exception of reasonable fees, appropriately disclosed in advance, that are specifically designed to prevent generally recognized abusive investment practices or specifically designed to ensure equitable treatment of all investors in a pooled fund in the event such withdrawal or termination may have adverse consequences for all other investors, provided that such fees are applied consistently and in like manner to all such investors; (6) Not to include exculpatory provisions disclaiming or otherwise limiting liability of the Northern QPAM for a violation of such agreement's terms, except for liability caused by an error, misrepresentation, or misconduct of a plan fiduciary or other party hired by the plan fiduciary who is independent of Northern Trust; and (7) To indemnify and hold harmless the ERISA-covered plan or IRA for any damages resulting from a violation of applicable laws, a breach of contract, or any claim arising out of the failure of such Northern QPAM to qualify for the exemptive relief provided by PTE 84-14 as a result of a violation of Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 other than the Conviction. Within six (6) months of the date of the Conviction, each Northern QPAM will: Provide a notice of its obligations under this Section I(i) to each ERISA-covered plan and IRA for which a Northern QPAM provides asset management or other discretionary fiduciary services; (j) The Northern QPAMs comply with each condition of PTE 84-14, as amended, with the sole exceptions of the violations of Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 that are attributable to the Conviction; (k) Each Northern QPAM will maintain records necessary to demonstrate that the conditions of this temporary exemption have been met, for six (6) years following the date of any transaction for which such Northern QPAM relies upon the relief in the temporary exemption; (l) During the effective period of this temporary exemption, Northern Trust: (1) Immediately discloses to the Department any Deferred Prosecution Agreement (a DPA) or Non-Prosecution Agreement (an NPA) that Northern Trust enters into with the U.S Department of Justice, to the extent such DPA or NPA involves conduct described in Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 or section 411 of ERISA; and (2) immediately provides the Department any information requested by the Department, as permitted by law, regarding the agreement and/or the conduct and allegations that led to the agreements; and (m) A Northern QPAM will not fail to meet the terms of this temporary exemption, solely because a different Northern QPAM fails to satisfy a condition for relief under this temporary exemption, described in Sections I(c), (d), (h), (i), (j), and (k). Section II--Definitions (a) The term ``Conviction'' means the potential judgment of conviction against NTFS for aiding and abetting tax fraud to be entered in France in the District Court of Paris, French Special Prosecutor No. 1120392066, French Investigative Judge No. JIRSIF/11/12; (b) The term ``Northern QPAM'' means a ``qualified professional asset manager'' (as defined in section VI(a) \8\ of PTE 84-14) that relies on the relief provided by PTE 84-14 and with respect to which NTFS is a current or future ``affiliate'' (as defined in section VI(d) of PTE 84-14); --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \8\ In general terms, a QPAM is an independent fiduciary that is a bank, savings and loan association, insurance company, or investment adviser that meets certain equity or net worth requirements and other licensure requirements and that has acknowledged in a written management agreement that it is a fiduciary with respect to each plan that has retained the QPAM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (c) The term ``NTFS'' means Northern Trust Fiduciary Services (Guernsey) ltd., an affiliate'' of Northern (as defined in section VI(c) of PTE 84-14) located in Guernsey; (d) The terms ``ERISA-covered plan'' and ``IRA'' mean, respectively, a plan subject to Part 4 of Title I of ERISA and a plan subject to section 4975 of the Code; and (e) The term ``Northern'' means Northern Trust Corporation, together with its current and future affiliates. Effective Date: This temporary exemption is effective for the period beginning on the Conviction Date until the earlier of: The date that is twelve months following the Conviction Date; or the effective date of a final agency action made by the Department in connection with an application for long-term exemptive relief for the covered transactions described herein. Supplementary Information On October 12, 2016, the Department of Labor (the Department) published a notice of proposed temporary exemption in the Federal Register at 81 FR 70562, proposing that certain entities with specified relationships to NTFS could continue to rely upon the relief provided by PTE 84-14 (49 FR 9494 (March 13, 1984), as corrected at 50 FR 41430 (October 10, 1985), as amended at 70 FR 49305 (August 23, 2005), and as amended at 75 FR 38837 (July 6, 2010)), notwithstanding a judgment of conviction against NTFS for aiding and abetting tax fraud, to be entered in France in the District Court of Paris (the Conviction, as further defined in Section II(a)),\9\ for a period of up to twelve months beginning on the date of the Conviction. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \9\ Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 generally provides that ``[n]either the QPAM nor any affiliate thereof . . . nor any owner . . . of a 5 percent or more interest in the QPAM is a person who within the 10 years immediately preceding the transaction has been either convicted or released from imprisonment, whichever is later, as a result of'' certain felonies including income tax evasion, and aiding and abetting tax evasion. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Department is today granting this temporary exemption in order to protect ERISA-covered plans and IRAs from certain costs and/or investment losses that may arise to the extent entities with a corporate relationship to NTFS lose their ability to rely on PTE 84-14 as of the Conviction Date, as described in the proposed temporary exemption. The Department is considering proposing longer-term relief for Northern QPAMs to rely on PTE 84-14 notwithstanding the Conviction, in Application No. D-11911. The relief in this temporary exemption provides the Department more time to consider whether longer-term relief is warranted. No relief from a violation of any other law is provided by this temporary exemption, including any criminal conviction described in the proposed temporary exemption. Furthermore, the [[Page 75153]] Department cautions that the relief in this temporary exemption will terminate immediately if, among other things, an entity within the Northern corporate structure is convicted of a crime described in Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 (other than the Conviction) during the effective period of the temporary exemption. While such an entity could apply for a new exemption in that circumstance, the Department would not be obligated to grant the exemption. The terms of this temporary exemption have been specifically designed to permit plans to terminate their relationships in an orderly and cost effective fashion in the event of an additional conviction or a determination that it is otherwise prudent for a plan to terminate its relationship with an entity covered by the temporary exemption. Written Comments The Department invited all interested persons to submit written comments and/or requests for a public hearing with respect to the notice of proposed temporary exemption, published on October 12, 2016. All comments and requests for hearing were due by October 18, 2016. The Department received two written comments, one from Northern Trust, the other from Clearing House Association L.L.C. (TCH), both of which are described below. Although the Department has revised, in part, the proposed exemption in the manner requested by Northern Trust, the Department cautions that it may decline to include such revisions in any decision to grant more permanent relief. Northern Trust Comment Northern Trust notes that Section I(h) of the proposed exemption requires that each Northern QPAM ``immediately:'' Develop, implement, maintain and follow certain written policies; and develop and implement a program of training. Northern Trust seeks a period of up to four months following the date of its impending conviction to meet these requirements. The Department agrees that four months is a reasonable period of time with which to comply with the requirement of Section I(h) and has revised the condition accordingly. Northern Trust seeks another change to Section I(h)(1)(i), through the deletion of the bracketed language, ``The asset management decisions of the Northern QPAM are conducted independently of the management and business activities of [Northern, including] NTFS [and Northern's non-asset management affiliates.]'' Northern Trust represents that it has neither committed, nor been accused of committing, a crime. The Department has revised the condition accordingly. Northern Trust seeks deletion of the requirement in Section I(i) that requires each Northern QPAM to separately warrant in writing its obligations to ERISA-Covered Plans and IRAs. While the Department has made such revision for purposes of the limited relief herein, the Department re-emphasizes, as noted above, that it may decide to propose more permanent relief that does not contain this revision. Northern Trust seeks deletion of the requirement set forth in Section I(i)(6) that, each Northern QPAM agrees: ``Not to include exculpatory provisions disclaiming or otherwise limiting liability of the Northern QPAM for a violation of such agreement's terms.'' The Department declines to make such deletion, but has revised the condition to read: ``Not to include exculpatory provisions disclaiming or otherwise limiting liability of the Northern QPAM for a violation of such agreement's terms, except for liability caused by an error, misrepresentation, or misconduct of a plan fiduciary or other party hired by the plan fiduciary who is independent of Northern Trust.'' Condition (l) of the proposed exemption provided that neither Northern Trust nor any affiliate could enter into a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (a DPA) or a Non-Prosecution Agreement (an NPA) with the U.S. Department of Justice, in connection with conduct described in Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 or section 411 of ERISA. Northern Trust sought to reserve its right to comment on this condition in connection with the Department's consideration of more permanent relief. The Department has nonetheless determined to revise condition (l), to require that, during the effective period of this temporary exemption, Northern Trust: (1) Immediately discloses to the Department any Deferred Prosecution Agreement (a DPA) or Non-Prosecution Agreement (an NPA) that Northern Trust enters into with the U.S. Department of Justice, to the extent such DPA or NPA involves conduct described in Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 or section 411 of ERISA; and (2) immediately provides the Department any information requested by the Department, as permitted by law, regarding the agreement and/or the conduct and allegations that led to the agreements. The Clearing House Comment The Clearing House Association L.L.C. (TCH) submitted a comment that expresses concern regarding condition (l) in Section I of the proposed temporary exemption. Although the Department has revised condition (l) in the manner described above, the Department will continue to consider TCH's comment in connection with its consideration of more permanent relief for Northern Trust. After giving full consideration to the record, the Department has decided to grant the temporary exemption, as described above. The complete application file (Application No. D-11875) is available for public inspection in the Public Disclosure Room of the Employee Benefits Security Administration, Room N-1515, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. For a more complete statement of the facts and representations supporting the Department's decision to grant this temporary exemption, refer to the notice of proposed temporary exemption published on October 12, 2016 at 81 FR 70569. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Anna Mpras Vaughan of the Department, telephone (202) 693-8565. (This is not a toll-free number.) Extension of PTE 2015-15 (the Extension) Involving Deutsche Bank AG (Deutsche Bank), Located in Frankfurt, Germany [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2016-12; Exemption Application No. D- 11879] Exemption Section I--Covered Transactions Certain asset managers with specified relationships to Deutsche Bank (hereinafter, the DB QPAMs, as further defined in Section II(b)) shall not be precluded from relying on the exemptive relief provided by Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84-14,\10\ notwithstanding a judgment of conviction against Deutsche Securities Korea Co., a South Korean affiliate of Deutsche Bank (hereinafter, DSK, as further defined in Section II(c)), entered on January 25, 2016 (the Korean Conviction, as further defined in Section II(a)),\11\ provided that the following conditions are satisfied: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ 49 FR 9494 (March 13, 1984), as corrected at 50 FR 41430 (October 10, 1985), as amended at 70 FR 49305 (August 23, 2005), and as amended at 75 FR 38837 (July 6, 2010). \11\ Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 generally provides that ``[n]either the QPAM nor any affiliate thereof . . . nor any owner . . . of a 5 percent or more interest in the QPAM is a person who within the 10 years immediately preceding the transaction has been either convicted or released from imprisonment, whichever is later, as a result of'' certain felonies including income tax evasion and conspiracy or attempt to commit income tax evasion. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 75154]] (a) The DB QPAMs (including their officers, directors, agents other than Deutsche Bank, and employees of such DB QPAMs) did not know of, have reason to know of, or participate in the criminal conduct of DSK that is the subject of the Korean Conviction; (b) Any failure of the DB QPAMs to satisfy Section I(g) of PTE 84- 14 arose solely from the Korean Conviction; (c) The DB QPAMs (including their officers, directors, agents other than Deutsche Bank, and employees of such DB QPAMs) did not receive direct compensation, or knowingly receive indirect compensation, in connection with the criminal conduct that is the subject of the Conviction; (d) A DB QPAM will not use its authority or influence to direct an ``investment fund'' (as defined in Section VI(b) of PTE 84-14) that is subject to ERISA and managed by such DB QPAM to enter into any transaction with DSK or engage DSK to provide additional services to such investment fund, for a direct or indirect fee borne by such investment fund regardless of whether such transactions or services may otherwise be within the scope of relief provided by an administrative or statutory exemption; (e)(1) Each DB QPAM maintains and follows written policies (the Policies) requiring and reasonably designed to ensure that: (i) The asset management decisions of the DB QPAM are conducted independently of Deutsche Bank's management and business activities; (ii) the DB QPAM fully complies with ERISA's fiduciary duties and ERISA and the Code's prohibited transaction provisions and does not knowingly participate in any violations of these duties and provisions with respect to ERISA- covered plans and IRAs; (iii) the DB QPAM does not knowingly participate in any other person's violation of ERISA or the Code with respect to ERISA-covered plans and IRAs; (iv) any filings or statements made by the DB QPAM to regulators, including but not limited to, the Department of Labor, the Department of the Treasury, the Department of Justice, and the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, on behalf of ERISA-covered plans or IRAs are materially accurate and complete, to the best of such DB QPAM's knowledge at that time; (v) the DB QPAM does not make material misrepresentations or omit material information in its communications with such regulators with respect to ERISA-covered plans or IRAs, or make material misrepresentations or omit material information in its communications with ERISA-covered plan and IRA clients; (vi) the DB QPAM complies with the terms of this Extension; and (vii) any violations of or failure to comply with items (ii) through (vi) are corrected promptly upon discovery and any such violations or compliance failures not promptly corrected are reported, upon discovering the failure to promptly correct, in writing to appropriate corporate officers, the head of Compliance and the General Counsel of the relevant DB QPAM (or their functional equivalent), the independent auditor responsible for reviewing compliance with the Policies, and an appropriate fiduciary of any affected ERISA-covered plan or IRA that is independent of Deutsche Bank; however, with respect to any ERISA-covered plan or IRA sponsored by an ``affiliate'' (as defined in Section VI(d) of PTE 84-14) of Deutsche Bank or beneficially owned by an employee of Deutsche Bank or its affiliates, such fiduciary does not need to be independent of Deutsche Bank. DB QPAMs will not be treated as having failed to develop, implement, maintain, or follow the Policies, provided that they correct any instances of noncompliance promptly when discovered or when they reasonably should have known of the noncompliance (whichever is earlier), and provided that they adhere to the reporting requirements set forth in this item (vii); (2) Each DB QPAM maintains and follows a program of training (the Training), conducted during the effective period of this Extension, for relevant DB QPAM asset management, legal, compliance, and internal audit personnel (other than personnel who received training in a manner that meets the requirements of PTE 2015-15 within the prior 12 months); the Training must be set forth in the Policies and, at a minimum, cover the Policies, ERISA and Code compliance (including applicable fiduciary duties and the prohibited transaction provisions) and ethical conduct, the consequences for not complying with the conditions of this Extension, (including the loss of the exemptive relief provided therein), and prompt reporting of wrongdoing; (f)(1) Each DB QPAM submits to an audit conducted by an independent auditor, who has been prudently selected and who has appropriate technical training and proficiency with ERISA and the Code to evaluate the adequacy of, and compliance with, the Policies and Training described herein; the audit requirement must be incorporated in the Policies. The audit must cover the period of time during which this Extension is effective, and must be completed no later than six (6) months after the period to which the audit applies; (2) To the extent necessary for the auditor, in its sole opinion, to complete its audit and comply with the conditions for relief described herein, and as permitted by law, each DB QPAM and, if applicable, Deutsche Bank, will grant the auditor unconditional access to its business, including, but not limited to: its computer systems, business records, transactional data, workplace locations, training materials, and personnel; (3) The auditor's engagement must specifically require the auditor to determine whether each DB QPAM has developed, implemented, maintained, and followed Policies in accordance with the conditions of this Extension and developed and implemented the Training, as required herein; (4) The auditor's engagement shall specifically require the auditor to test each DB QPAM's operational compliance with the Policies and Training. In this regard, the auditor must test a sample of the QPAM's transactions involving ERISA-covered plans and IRAs sufficient in size and nature to afford the auditor a reasonable basis to determine the operational compliance with the Policies and Training; (5) On or before the end of the period described in Section I(f)(1) for completing the audit, the auditor must issue a written report (the Audit Report) to Deutsche Bank and the DB QPAM to which the audit applies that describes the procedures performed by the auditor during the course of its examination. The Audit Report must include the auditor's specific determinations regarding the adequacy of, and compliance with, the Policies and Training; the auditor's recommendations (if any) with respect to strengthening such Policies and Training; and any instances of the respective DB QPAM's noncompliance with the written Policies and Training described in paragraph (e) above. Any determinations made by the auditor regarding the adequacy of the Policies and Training and the auditor's recommendations (if any) with respect to strengthening the Policies and Training of the respective DB QPAM must be promptly addressed by such DB QPAM, and any actions taken by such DB QPAM to address such recommendations must be included in an addendum to the Audit Report. Any determinations by the auditor that the [[Page 75155]] respective DB QPAM has maintained and followed sufficient Policies and Training shall not be based solely or in substantial part on an absence of evidence indicating noncompliance. In this last regard, any finding that the DB QPAM has complied with the requirements under this subsection must be based on evidence that demonstrates the DB QPAM has actually maintained and followed the Policies and Training required by this Extension and not solely on a lack of evidence that the DB QPAM has violated ERISA; (6) The auditor shall notify the respective DB QPAM of any instances of noncompliance identified by the auditor within five (5) business days after such noncompliance is identified by the auditor, regardless of whether the audit has been completed as of that date; (7) With respect to each Audit Report, the General Counsel or one of the three most senior executive officers of the DB QPAM to which the Audit Report applies certifies in writing, under penalty of perjury, that the officer has reviewed the Audit Report and this Extension; addressed, corrected, or remedied any inadequacies identified in the Audit Report; and determined that the Policies and Training in effect at the time of signing are adequate to ensure compliance with the conditions of this Extension and with the applicable provisions of ERISA and the Code; (8) An executive officer of Deutsche Bank reviews the Audit Report for each DB QPAM and certifies in writing, under penalty of perjury, that such officer has reviewed each Audit Report; (9) Each DB QPAM provides its certified Audit Report to the Department's Office of Exemption Determinations (OED), 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Suite 400, Washington DC 20210, no later than 45 days following its completion, and each DB QPAM makes its Audit Report unconditionally available for examination by any duly authorized employee or representative of the Department, other relevant regulators, and any fiduciary of an ERISA-covered plan or IRA, the assets of which are managed by such DB QPAM; (10) Each DB QPAM and the auditor will submit to OED (A) any engagement agreement(s) entered into pursuant to the engagement of the auditor under this Extension, and (B) any engagement agreement entered into with any other entities retained in connection with such QPAM's compliance with the Training or Policies conditions of this Extension, no later than three (3) months after the effective date of the Extension (and one month after the execution of any agreement thereafter); (11) The auditor shall provide OED, upon request, all of the workpapers created and utilized in the course of the audit, including, but not limited to: the audit plan, audit testing, identification of any instances of noncompliance by the relevant DB QPAM, and an explanation of any corrective or remedial actions taken by the applicable DB QPAM; and (12) Deutsche Bank must notify the Department at least 30 days prior to any substitution of an auditor, except that no such replacement will meet the requirements of this paragraph unless and until Deutsche Bank demonstrates to the Department's satisfaction that such new auditor is independent of Deutsche Bank, experienced in the matters that are the subject of the Extension, and capable of making the determinations required of this Extension. Notwithstanding the above, this audit requirement will be deemed met to the extent the Department issues more permanent relief that expressly supersedes this paragraph (f), and the terms of such new audit requirement have been met; (g) With respect to each ERISA-covered plan or IRA for which a DB QPAM provides asset management or other discretionary fiduciary services, each DB QPAM agrees: (1) To comply with ERISA and the Code, as applicable with respect to such ERISA-covered plan or IRA, and refrain from engaging in prohibited transactions that are not otherwise exempt; (2) not to waive, limit, or qualify the liability of the DB QPAM for violating ERISA or the Code or engaging in prohibited transactions; (3) not to require the ERISA-covered plan or IRA (or sponsor of such ERISA-covered plan or beneficial owner of such IRA) to indemnify the DB QPAM for violating ERISA or engaging in prohibited transactions, except for violations or prohibited transactions caused by an error, misrepresentation, or misconduct of a plan fiduciary or other party hired by the plan fiduciary who is independent of Deutsche Bank; (4) not to restrict the ability of such ERISA-covered plan or IRA to terminate or withdraw from its arrangement with the DB QPAM, with the exception of reasonable restrictions, appropriately disclosed in advance, that are specifically designed to ensure equitable treatment of all investors in a pooled fund in the event such withdrawal or termination may have adverse consequences for all other investors, provided that such restrictions are applied consistently and in like manner to all such investors; and (5) not to impose any fees, penalties, or charges for such termination or withdrawal with the exception of reasonable fees, appropriately disclosed in advance, that are specifically designed to prevent generally recognized abusive investment practices or specifically designed to ensure equitable treatment of all investors in a pooled fund in the event such withdrawal or termination may have adverse consequences for all other investors, provided that such fees are applied consistently and in like manner to all such investors. Within two (2) months of the date of publication of this notice of Extension in the Federal Register, each DB QPAM will provide a notice to such effect to each ERISA-covered plan or IRA for which a DB QPAM provides asset management or other discretionary fiduciary services in reliance on PTE 84-14, unless such notice was previously provided consistent with PTE 2015-15; (h) Each DB QPAM will maintain records necessary to demonstrate that the conditions of this Extension have been met, for six (6) years following the date of any transaction for which such DB QPAM relies upon the relief in the Extension; (i) The DB QPAMs comply with each condition of PTE 84-14, as amended, with the sole exception of the violation of Section I(g) that is attributable to the Korean Conviction; (j) The DB QPAMs will not employ any of the individuals that engaged in the spot/futures-linked market manipulation activities that led to the Korean Conviction; (k) Deutsche Bank disgorged all of its profits generated by the spot/futures-linked market manipulation activities of DSK personnel that led to the Korean Conviction; (l) Deutsche Bank imposes internal procedures, controls, and protocols on DSK designed to reduce the likelihood of any recurrence of the conduct that is the subject of the Korean Conviction, to the extent permitted by local law; (m) DSK will not provide fiduciary or QPAM services to ERISA- covered Plans or IRAs, and will not otherwise exercise discretionary control over plan assets; (n) No DB QPAM is a subsidiary of DSK, and DSK is not a subsidiary of any DB QPAM; (o) The criminal conduct of DSK that is the subject of the Korean Conviction did not directly or indirectly involve the assets of any plan subject to Part 4 of Title I of ERISA or section 4975 of the Code; and (p) A DB QPAM will not fail to meet the terms of this Extension solely because a different DB QPAM fails to satisfy the conditions for relief under [[Page 75156]] this Extension described in Sections I(d), (e), (f), (g), (h), (i) and (j). Section II--Definitions (a) The term ``Korean Conviction'' means the judgment of conviction against DSK entered on January 25, 2016, in Seoul Central District Court, relating to charges filed against DSK under Articles 176, 443, and 448 of South Korea's Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act for spot/futures-linked market price manipulation; (b) The term ``DB QPAM'' means a ``qualified professional asset manager'' (as defined in section VI(a) \12\ of PTE 84-14) that relies on the relief provided by PTE 84-14 and with respect to which DSK is a current or future ``affiliate'' (as defined in section VI(d) of PTE 84- 14). For purposes of this Extension, Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. (DBSI), including all entities over which it exercises control; and Deutsche Bank AG, including all of its branches, are excluded from the definition of a DB QPAM; and --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \12\ In general terms, a QPAM is an independent fiduciary that is a bank, savings and loan association, insurance company, or investment adviser that meets certain equity or net worth requirements and other licensure requirements and that has acknowledged in a written management agreement that it is a fiduciary with respect to each plan that has retained the QPAM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (c) The term ``DSK'' means Deutsche Securities Korea Co., a South Korean ``affiliate'' of Deutsche Bank (as the term ``affiliate'' is defined in section VI(c) of PTE 84-14). Effective Date: This Extension will be effective for the period beginning October 24, 2016 and ending on the earlier of: April 23, 2017 or the effective date of a final agency action made by the Department in connection with Exemption Application No. D-11856.\13\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \13\ In this regard, as noted below, the Applicant has requested substantially similar relief to the relief described herein, but on a more permanent basis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Supplementary Information On October 12, 2016, the Department of Labor (the Department) published a notice of proposed extension in the Federal Register at 81 FR 70577, proposing that certain entities with specified relationships to DSK could continue to rely upon the relief provided by PTE 84-14 (49 FR 9494 (March 13, 1984), as corrected at 50 FR 41430 (October 10, 1985), as amended at 70 FR 49305 (August 23, 2005), and as amended at 75 FR 38837 (July 6, 2010)), notwithstanding the Korean Conviction. The Department is today granting this Extension in order to protect ERISA-covered plans and IRAs from certain costs and/or investment losses that may arise to the extent entities with a corporate relationship to DSK lose their ability to rely on PTE 84-14 as of the expiration of PTE 2015-15. The relief in this Extension provides the Department more time to consider whether more permanent relief is warranted. No relief from a violation of any other law is provided by this Extension, including any criminal conviction described in the proposed extension or in PTE 2015-15. Furthermore, the Department cautions that the relief in this Extension will terminate immediately if, among other things, an entity within the Deutsche Bank corporate family is convicted of a crime described in Section I(g) of PTE 84-14 during the effective period of the Extension. While such an entity could apply for a new exemption in that circumstance, the Department would not be obligated to grant that exemption. The terms of this Extension have been specifically designed to permit plans to terminate their relationships in an orderly and cost effective fashion in the event of an additional conviction or a determination that it is otherwise prudent for a plan to terminate its relationship with an entity covered by the Extension. Written Comments The Department invited all interested persons to submit written comments and/or requests for a public hearing with respect to the notice of proposed extension, published on October 12, 2016, at 81 FR 70577. All comments and requests for hearing were due by October 19, 2016. Because of the abbreviated comment period, the Department will consider comments received within a reasonable period of time after October 19, 2016 in connection with its consideration of long-term exemptive relief for the DB QPAMs in connection with Exemption Application No. D-11908, described above. During the comment period, the Department received two written comments, one from the independent auditor and one from Deutsche Bank AG, both of which are described below. Although the Department has, for the most part, revised the proposed exemption in the manner requested by Deutsche Bank AG, the Department cautions that it may decline to include those revisions in any decision to grant more permanent relief. Independent Auditor's Comment Section I(f)(1) of the proposed extension requires that the audit, along with the report, must be completed no later than three months after the period to which the audit relates. In its comment, the auditor requested that the audit requirement described in Section I(f)(1) of the proposed extension be modified to require that the audit report must be completed no later than six months after the period to which the audit relates. The auditor explains that, during the course of its audit, it needs to review an extensive amount of materials, relevant systems and training, and digest the information provided in response to various requests for information. Furthermore, the auditor states that it will take a significant amount of time to develop and review follow-up questions based upon its initial analysis of the materials and systems; and the report that the auditor provides to the Department needs to be robust, comprehensive and detailed. The Department views a rigorous, transparent, and comprehensive audit as essential to ensuring that the conditions for exemptive relief described herein are followed by the DB QPAMs. As such, the Department has extended the deadline by which point the audit must be completed from three months following the period to which the audit applies to six months. Deutsche Bank's Comment Deutsche Bank seeks several changes and/or clarifications to the proposed extension. First, Deutsche Bank requests that the Department revise the proposed exemption in a manner that would potentially extend the duration of this Extension. The Department declines to extend this duration of the Extension in the manner requested by Deutsche Bank, but notes that it is currently considering proposing more permanent relief pursuant to Application Numbers D-11879 and D-11908. Regarding the audit, Deutsche Bank seeks to extend the certification period set forth in Section I(f)(9) from 30 days to 45 days. The Department has revised the condition accordingly. Deutsche Bank also requests that the timing of the audit be adjusted in the same manner sought by the auditor. This adjustment is discussed above. Deutsche requests certain changes to the training requirement described in Section I(e)(2) of the proposed extension. Deutsche Bank seeks to coordinate that condition with the training requirement set forth in PTE 2015-15, such that duplicative training is not required over a short period of time. The Department has revised Section I(e)(2) to exclude training for personnel who received training in a manner that meets the requirements of PTE 2015-15 within the prior 12 months. [[Page 75157]] Deutsche Bank also seeks changes to the notice requirement described in Section I(g) of the proposed exemption. Deutsche Bank seeks to add the following bracketed language, such that Section I(g) reads: ``Within two (2) months of the date of publication of this notice of Extension in the Federal Register, each DB QPAM will provide a notice to such effect to each ERISA-covered plan or IRA for which a DB QPAM provides asset management or other discretionary fiduciary services [in reliance on PTE 84-14], unless such notice was previously provided consistent with PTE 2015-15.'' The Department has revised the condition accordingly. Deutsche Bank requests an adjustment to certain restrictions the proposed exemption places on DSK. In this regard, Deutsche Bank seeks to add the following bracketed language, and to delete the following italicized language, such that Section I(m) reads: ``DSK has not, and will not, provide [discretionary asset management services or other discretionary] fiduciary or QPAM services to ERISA-covered Plans or IRAs, and will not otherwise exercise discretionary control over plan assets.'' The Department declines Deutsche Bank's request, but has revised the condition to more clearly require that this condition is intended to be met prospectively, not retroactively. Deutsche Bank also seeks clarification that for purposes of the Extension, the auditor, and not the QPAMs, must provide the relevant workpapers to the Department. The Department agrees with that interpretation of the condition. In its letter to the Department, Deutsche Bank states that footnotes 38 and 42, which reference tax-related crimes, are unrelated to Deutsche Bank's application and should be deleted. Deutsche Bank also requests that the Department note for the record that ``Deutsche Bank identified Mr. Ripley both as an employee of DBSI and a subject of the Korean case on numerous prior occasions, including as far back as 2011, as well as more recently.'' After giving full consideration to the entire record, the Department has decided to grant the Extension. The complete application file for the Extension (Exemption Application No. D-11879), including all supplemental submissions received by the Department, as well as the application file for PTE 2015-15 (Exemption Application No. D-11696), are available for public inspection in the Public Disclosure Room of the Employee Benefits Security Administration, Room N-1515, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. For a more complete statement of the facts and representations supporting the Department's decision to grant this Extension, refer to the notice of proposed extension, published on October 12, 2016, at 81 FR 70577. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Scott Ness of the Department, telephone (202) 693-8561. (This is not a toll-free number.) General Information The attention of interested persons is directed to the following: (1) The fact that a transaction is the subject of an exemption under section 408(a) of the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve a fiduciary or other party in interest or disqualified person from certain other provisions to which the exemption does not apply and the general fiduciary responsibility provisions of section 404 of the Act, which among other things require a fiduciary to discharge his duties respecting the plan solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries of the plan and in a prudent fashion in accordance with section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Act; nor does it affect the requirement of section 401(a) of the Code that the plan must operate for the exclusive benefit of the employees of the employer maintaining the plan and their beneficiaries; (2) These exemptions are supplemental to and not in derogation of, any other provisions of the Act and/or the Code, including statutory or administrative exemptions and transactional rules. Furthermore, the fact that a transaction is subject to an administrative or statutory exemption is not dispositive of whether the transaction is in fact a prohibited transaction; and (3) The availability of these exemptions is subject to the express condition that the material facts and representations contained in the application accurately describes all material terms of the transaction which is the subject of the exemption. Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of October, 2016. Lyssa E. Hall, Director of Exemption Determinations, Employee Benefits Security Administration, U.S. Department of Labor. [FR Doc. 2016-26089 Filed 10-27-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510-29-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 209 / Friday, October 28, 2016 / Notices 75147
In accordance with the applicable DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 66644, October 27, 2011) 1 and based
regulations under 30 CFR parts 762 and upon the entire record, the Department
764 and the requirements of the Employee Benefits Security makes the following findings:
National Environmental Policy Act of Administration (a) The exemption is administratively
1969 (NEPA), as amended, OSMRE feasible;
Exemptions From Certain Prohibited (b) The exemption is in the interests
evaluated the merits of the unsuitability
Transaction Restrictions of the plan and its participants and
petition and analyzed the impacts of
beneficiaries; and
these alternatives. This analysis is AGENCY:Employee Benefits Security (c) The exemption is protective of the
reflected in the Final PED/EIS, which Administration, Labor. rights of the participants and
notes the potential impacts of the beneficiaries of the plan.
project and alternatives on earth ACTION: Grant of individual exemptions.
resources (geology, topography and Royal Bank of Canada (Together With
physiography), air quality and SUMMARY: This document contains Its Current and Future Affiliates, RBC
exemptions issued by the Department of or the Applicant), Located in Toronto,
greenhouse gases, groundwater, surface
Labor (the Department) from certain of Ontario, Canada
water, wetlands, vegetation, fish and
the prohibited transaction restrictions of
wildlife including special status species, [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2016–10;
the Employee Retirement Income Exemption Application No. D–11868]
land use, aesthetics including visual Security Act of 1974 (ERISA or the Act)
resources and soundscapes, and/or the Internal Revenue Code of Temporary Exemption
socioeconomics and environmental 1986 (the Code). This notice includes
justice, cultural resources including Section I—Covered Transactions
the following: 2016–10, Royal Bank of
archaeological, historic and Canada, D–11868; 2016–11, Northern Certain entities with specified
ethnographic resources, and public Trust Corporation, D–11875; and, 2016– relationships to Royal Bank of Canada
health and safety. Mitigation measures 12, Extension of PTE 2015–15 involving Trust Company (Bahamas) Limited
to be included as part of project Deutsche Bank AG, D–11879. (RBCTC Bahamas) (hereinafter, the RBC
implementation will be noted in the QPAMs, as further defined in Section
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A notice II(b)) will not be precluded from relying
final decision.
was published in the Federal Register of on the exemptive relief provided by
In accordance with Department of the the pendency before the Department of Prohibited Transaction Exemption (PTE)
Interior regulations (43 CFR 46.425), a proposal to grant such exemption. The 84–14,2 notwithstanding a judgment of
OSMRE identified Alternative 3 as the notice set forth a summary of facts and conviction against RBCTC Bahamas for
preferred alternative in the Draft EIS. representations contained in the aiding and abetting tax fraud, to be
However, based on public and agency application for exemption and referred entered in France in the District Court
comments, as well as the state’s input, interested persons to the application for of Paris (the Conviction, as further
OSMRE has now identified alternative 4 a complete statement of the facts and defined in Section II(a)),3 for a period of
as the preferred alternative because it is representations. The application has up to twelve months beginning on the
the most consistent with the state’s been available for public inspection at date of the Conviction (the Conviction
request. OSMRE reached that decision the Department in Washington, DC. The Date), provided that the following
based on its analysis and conclusion notice also invited interested persons to conditions are satisfied:
that the ‘‘agency’s preferred alternative’’ submit comments on the requested (a) The RBC QPAMs (including their
is the alternative the agency believes exemption to the Department. In officers, directors, agents other than
would best accomplish the purpose of addition the notice stated that any RBC, and employees of such RBC
and need for action, and fulfill its interested person might submit a QPAMs) did not know of, have reason
statutory mission and responsibilities, written request that a public hearing be to know of, or participate in the
while still giving consideration to held (where appropriate). The applicant criminal conduct of RBCTC Bahamas
has represented that it has complied that is the subject of the Conviction (for
economic, environmental, technical,
with the requirements of the notification purposes of this paragraph (a),
and other factors. Alternative 4 is also
to interested persons. No requests for a ‘‘participate in’’ includes the knowing
the environmentally preferred hearing were received by the or tacit approval of the misconduct
alternative because of its long-term Department. Public comments were underlying the Conviction);
environmental benefits. received by the Department as described (b) The RBC QPAMs (including their
The OSMRE will prepare a Record of in the granted exemption. officers, directors, agents other than
Decision (ROD) for the proposed The notice of proposed exemption RBC, and employees of such RBC
petition after a 30-day period following was issued and the exemption is being 1 The Department has considered exemption
publication of the NOA. granted solely by the Department applications received prior to December 27, 2011
Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.1. because, effective December 31, 1978, under the exemption procedures set forth in 29 CFR
section 102 of Reorganization Plan No. part 2570, subpart B (55 FR 32836, 32847, August
Dated: October 7, 2016. 10, 1990).
4 of 1978, 5 U.S.C. App. 1 (1996),
Thomas D. Shope, transferred the authority of the Secretary
2 49 FR 9494 (March 13, 1984), as corrected at 50
FR 41430 (October 10, 1985), as amended at 70 FR
Regional Director, Appalachian Region. of the Treasury to issue exemptions of 49305 (August 23, 2005), and as amended at 75 FR
[FR Doc. 2016–25868 Filed 10–27–16; 8:45 am] the type proposed to the Secretary of 38837 (July 6, 2010).
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P Labor. 3 Section I(g) of PTE 84–14 generally provides
that ‘‘[n]either the QPAM nor any affiliate thereof
Statutory Findings . . . nor any owner . . . of a 5 percent or more
interest in the QPAM is a person who within the
In accordance with section 408(a) of 10 years immediately preceding the transaction has
the Act and/or section 4975(c)(2) of the been either convicted or released from
imprisonment, whichever is later, as a result of’’
Code and the procedures set forth in 29 certain felonies including income tax evasion, and
CFR part 2570, subpart B (76 FR 66637, aiding and abetting tax evasion.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:12 Oct 27, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00122 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_75356/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 209 / Friday, October 28, 2016 / Notices 75149
investors, provided that such fees are RBCTC Bahamas for aiding and abetting a period of up to twelve months
applied consistently and in like manner tax fraud to be entered in France in the beginning on the date of the Conviction.
to all such investors; District Court of Paris, French Special The Department is today granting this
(6) Not to include exculpatory Prosecutor No. 1120392066, French temporary exemption in order to protect
provisions disclaiming or otherwise Investigative Judge No. JIRSIF/11/12; ERISA-covered plans and IRAs from
limiting liability of the RBC QPAM for (b) The term ‘‘RBC QPAM’’ means a certain costs and/or investment losses
a violation of such agreement’s terms, ‘‘qualified professional asset manager’’ that may arise to the extent entities with
except for liability caused by an error, (as defined in section VI(a) 4 of PTE 84– a corporate relationship to RBCTC
misrepresentation, or misconduct of a 14) that relies on the relief provided by Bahamas lose their ability to rely on
plan fiduciary or other party hired by PTE 84–14 and with respect to which PTE 84–14 as of the Conviction Date, as
the plan fiduciary who is independent RBCTC Bahamas is a current or future described in the proposed temporary
of RBC; and ‘‘affiliate’’ (as defined in section VI(d) of exemption. The Department is
(7) To indemnify and hold harmless PTE 84–14); considering proposing longer-term relief
the ERISA-covered plan or IRA for any (c) The term ‘‘RBCTC Bahamas’’ for RBC QPAMs to rely on PTE 84–14
damages resulting from a violation of means Royal Bank of Canada Trust notwithstanding the Conviction, in
applicable laws, a breach of contract, or Company (Bahamas) Limited, a Application No. D–11912. The relief in
any claim arising out of the failure of Bahamian ‘‘affiliate’’ of RBC (as defined this temporary exemption provides the
such RBC QPAM to qualify for the in section VI(c) of PTE 84–14); Department more time to consider
exemptive relief provided by PTE 84–14 (d) The terms ‘‘ERISA-covered plan’’ whether longer-term relief is warranted.
as a result of a violation of Section I(g) and ‘‘IRA’’ mean, respectively, a plan No relief from a violation of any other
of PTE 84–14 other than the Conviction. subject to Part 4 of Title I of ERISA and law is provided by this temporary
Within six (6) months of the date of a plan subject to section 4975 of the exemption, including any criminal
the Conviction, each RBC QPAM will: Code; and conviction described in the proposed
Provide a notice of its obligations under (e) The term ‘‘RBC’’ means Royal temporary exemption. Furthermore, the
this Section I(i) to each ERISA-covered Bank of Canada, together with its Department cautions that the relief in
plan and IRA for which an RBC QPAM current and future affiliates. this temporary exemption will terminate
provides asset management or other Effective Date: This temporary immediately if, among other things, an
discretionary fiduciary services; exemption is effective for the period entity within the RBC corporate
(j) The RBC QPAMs comply with each beginning on the Conviction Date until structure is convicted of a crime
condition of PTE 84–14, as amended, the earlier of: The date that is twelve described in Section I(g) of PTE 84–14
with the sole exceptions of the months following the Conviction Date; (other than the Conviction) during the
violations of Section I(g) of PTE 84–14 or the effective date of a final agency effective period of the temporary
that are attributable to the Conviction; action made by the Department in exemption. While such an entity could
(k) Each RBC QPAM will maintain connection with an application for long- apply for a new exemption in that
records necessary to demonstrate that term exemptive relief for the covered circumstance, the Department would
the conditions of this temporary transactions described herein. not be obligated to grant the exemption.
exemption have been met, for six (6) The terms of this temporary exemption
years following the date of any Supplementary Information have been specifically designed to
transaction for which such RBC QPAM On October 12, 2016, the Department permit plans to terminate their
relies upon the relief in the temporary of Labor (the Department) published a relationships in an orderly and cost
exemption; notice of proposed temporary effective fashion in the event of an
(l) During the effective period of this exemption in the Federal Register at 81 additional conviction or a determination
temporary exemption, RBC: (1) FR 70562, proposing that certain entities that it is otherwise prudent for a plan to
Immediately discloses to the with specified relationships to RBCTC terminate its relationship with an entity
Department any Deferred Prosecution Bahamas could continue to rely upon covered by the temporary exemption.
Agreement (a DPA) or Non-Prosecution the relief provided by PTE 84–14 (49 FR
Agreement (an NPA) that RBC or an Written Comments
9494 (March 13, 1984), as corrected at
affiliate enters into with the U.S 50 FR 41430 (October 10, 1985), as The Department invited all interested
Department of Justice, to the extent such amended at 70 FR 49305 (August 23, persons to submit written comments
DPA or NPA involves conduct described 2005), and as amended at 75 FR 38837 and/or requests for a public hearing
in Section I(g) of PTE 84–14 or section (July 6, 2010)), notwithstanding a with respect to the notice of proposed
411 of ERISA; and (2) immediately judgment of conviction against RBCTC temporary exemption, published on
provides the Department any Bahamas for aiding and abetting tax October 12, 2016. All comments and
information requested by the fraud, to be entered in France in the requests for hearing were due by
Department, as permitted by law, District Court of Paris (the Conviction, October 19, 2016. During the comment
regarding the agreement and/or the as further defined in Section II(a)),5 for period, the Department received written
conduct and allegations that led to the comments from RBC and from The
agreements; and 4 In general terms, a QPAM is an independent Clearing House. Although the
(m) An RBC QPAM will not fail to fiduciary that is a bank, savings and loan Department has, for the most part,
meet the terms of this temporary association, insurance company, or investment
revised the proposed temporary
exemption, solely because a different adviser that meets certain equity or net worth
requirements and other licensure requirements and exemption in the manner requested by
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
RBC QPAM fails to satisfy a condition that has acknowledged in a written management RBC, the Department cautions that it
for relief under this temporary agreement that it is a fiduciary with respect to each may decline to include those revisions
exemption, described in Sections I(c), plan that has retained the QPAM.
in any decision to grant more permanent
5 Section I(g) of PTE 84–14 generally provides
(d), (h), (i), (j), and (k). relief.
that ‘‘[n]either the QPAM nor any affiliate thereof
Section II—Definitions . . . nor any owner . . . of a 5 percent or more
interest in the QPAM is a person who within the imprisonment, whichever is later, as a result of’’
(a) The term ‘‘Conviction’’ means the 10 years immediately preceding the transaction has certain felonies including income tax evasion, and
potential judgment of conviction against been either convicted or released from aiding and abetting tax evasion.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:12 Oct 27, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00124 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_75356/page/3.svg)
![75150 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 209 / Friday, October 28, 2016 / Notices
RBC’s Comment decide to propose more permanent relief Immediately discloses to the
that does not contain this revision. Department any Deferred Prosecution
RBC seeks several revisions to the RBC seeks deletion of requirement set Agreement (a DPA) or Non-Prosecution
conditions set forth in the proposed forth in Section I(i)(6) that, each RBC Agreement (an NPA) that RBC or an
temporary exemption. First, RBC states QPAM agrees: ‘‘Not to include affiliate enters into with the U.S
that Section I(f) of the proposed exculpatory provisions disclaiming or Department of Justice, to the extent such
temporary exemption may be otherwise limiting liability of the RBC DPA or NPA involves conduct described
unintentionally broad. As proposed, QPAM for a violation of such in Section I(g) of PTE 84–14 or section
that condition states: ‘‘No entities agreement’s terms.’’ The Department 411 of ERISA; and (2) immediately
holding assets that constitute the assets declines to make such deletion, but has provides the Department any
of any plan subject to Part 4 of Title I revised the condition to read: ‘‘Not to information requested by the
of ERISA (an ERISA-covered plan) or include exculpatory provisions Department, as permitted by law,
section 4975 of the Code (an IRA) were disclaiming or otherwise limiting regarding the agreement and/or the
involved in the criminal conduct that is liability of the RBC QPAM for a conduct and allegations that led to the
the subject of the Conviction.’’ RBC violation of such agreement’s terms, agreements.
seeks to revise the condition to read: except for liability caused by an error,
‘‘The criminal conduct that is the misrepresentation, or misconduct of a The Clearing House Comment
subject of the Conviction did not plan fiduciary or other party hired by The Clearing House Association
directly or indirectly involve the assets the plan fiduciary who is independent L.L.C. (TCH) submitted a comment that
of any plan subject to Part 4 of Title I of RBC.’’ expresses concern regarding condition
of ERISA (an ERISA-covered plan) or RBC notes that, in addition to the (l) in Section I of the proposed
section 4975 of the Code (an IRA).’’ The asset managers identified in the temporary exemption. As noted above,
Department has decided to revise the proposed exemption, the following the Department has revised that
condition in the manner requested by managers are owned in whole or in part condition. The Department will
RBC. by RBC: BlueBay Asset Management continue to consider TCH’s comment in
Next, RBC notes that Section I(h) of USA, LLC; City National Bank; City connection with its consideration of
the proposed temporary exemption National Rochdale, LLC; City National more permanent relief for RBC.
requires that each RBC QPAM Securities, Inc.; Convergent Wealth
Advisors, LLC; LMCG Investments, LLC; After giving full consideration to the
‘‘immediately:’’ Develop, implement,
Mid-Continent Capital, L.L.C.; and record, the Department has decided to
maintain and follow certain written
Symphonic Financial Advisors LLC be grant the temporary exemption, as
policies; and develop and implement a
added to the list of primary U.S. bank described above. The complete
program of training. RBC seeks a period
and U.S. registered adviser affiliates in application file (Application No. D–
of up to four months following the date
which RBC owns a significant interest. 11868) is available for public inspection
of its impending conviction to meet
Three additional managers are owned in in the Public Disclosure Room of the
these requirements. The Department
part but not currently controlled by Employee Benefits Security
agrees that four months is a reasonable
RBC: Matthews International Capital Administration, Room N–1515, U.S.
period of time with which to comply
Management, LLC; SKBA Capital Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
with the requirement of Section I(h) and
Management, LLC; and O’Shaughnessy Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
has revised the condition accordingly.
Asset Management, LLC. Further, RBC For a more complete statement of the
RBC seeks another change to Section facts and representations supporting the
I(h)(1)(i), through the deletion of the believes that Footnote 16 of the
proposed exemption implies that the Department’s decision to grant this
bolded language, ‘‘The asset temporary exemption, refer to the notice
management decisions of the RBC Hong Kong investigation is connected to
RBCTC Bahamas’ alleged conduct that is of proposed temporary exemption
QPAM are conducted independently of published on October 12, 2016 at 81 FR
the subject of the French prosecution
the management and business activities 70562.
described in Section II(a) of the
of RBC, including RBCTC Bahamas.
proposal. According to RBC, the Hong FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
RBC represents that it has neither
Kong investigation is entirely unrelated Anna Mpras Vaughan of the
committed, nor been accused of
to the matter that is the subject of the Department, telephone (202) 693–8565.
committing, a crime. The Department
French prosecution described in Section (This is not a toll-free number.)
has revised the condition accordingly.
II(a).
RBC also seeks to change the start Condition (l) set forth in the proposed Northern Trust Corporation (Together
date of the notice requirement set forth exemption provided that during the With Its Current and Future Affiliates,
in Section I(i), such that each RBC must effective period of this temporary Northern or the Applicant), Located in
provide such notice within six months exemption, neither RBC nor any affiliate Chicago, Illinois
of the Conviction Date, rather than enters into a Deferred Prosecution [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2016–11;
within six months of the date of Agreement (a DPA) or a Non- Exemption Application No. D–11875]
publication of this granted temporary Prosecution Agreement (an NPA) with
exemption. The Department concurs the U.S Department of Justice, in Temporary Exemption
with this request, and has revised the connection with conduct described in Section I—Covered Transactions
temporary exemption accordingly. Section I(g) of PTE 84–14 or section 411
RBC seeks deletion of the requirement of ERISA. RBC sought to reserve its right Certain entities with specified
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
in Section I(i) that requires each RBC to comment on this condition in relationships to Northern Trust
QPAM to separately warrant in writing connection with the Department’s Fiduciary Services (Guernsey) ltd.
its obligations to ERISA-Covered Plans consideration of more permanent relief. (NTFS) (hereinafter, the Northern
and IRAs. While the Department has The Department has nonetheless revised QPAMs, as further defined in Section
made such revision for purposes of the condition (l) such that it now reads: II(b)) will not be precluded from relying
limited relief herein, the Department re- During the effective period of this on the exemptive relief provided by
emphasizes, as noted above, that it may temporary exemption, RBC: (1) Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84–
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:12 Oct 27, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00125 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_75356/page/4.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 209 / Friday, October 28, 2016 / Notices 75151
14 (PTE) 84–14,6 notwithstanding a (f) No entities holding assets that QPAM, and an appropriate fiduciary of
judgment of conviction against NTFS for constitute the assets of any plan subject any affected ERISA-covered plan or IRA
aiding and abetting tax fraud, to be to Part 4 of Title I of ERISA (an ERISA- where such fiduciary is independent of
entered in France in the District Court covered plan) or section 4975 of the Northern; however, with respect to any
of Paris (the Conviction, as further Code (an IRA) were involved in the ERISA-covered plan or IRA sponsored
defined in Section II(a)),7 for a period of criminal conduct that is the subject of by an ‘‘affiliate’’ (as defined in Section
up to twelve months beginning on the the Conviction; VI(d) of PTE 84–14) of Northern or
date of the Conviction (the Conviction (g) NTFS has not provided nor will beneficially owned by an employee of
Date), provided that the following provide discretionary asset management Northern or its affiliates, such fiduciary
conditions are satisfied: services to ERISA-covered plans or does not need to be independent of
(a) The Northern QPAMs (including IRAs, nor will it otherwise act as a Northern. A Northern QPAM will not be
their officers, directors, agents other fiduciary with respect to ERISA-covered treated as having failed to develop,
than Northern, and employees of such plan and IRA assets; implement, maintain, or follow the
Northern QPAMs) did not know of, have (h)(1) Within four months of the date Policies, provided that it corrects any
reason to know of, or participate in the of the Conviction, each Northern QPAM instance of noncompliance promptly
criminal conduct of NTFS that is the must develop, implement, maintain, when discovered or when it reasonably
subject of the Conviction (for purposes and follow written policies (the should have known of the
of this paragraph (a), ‘‘participate in’’ Policies) requiring and reasonably noncompliance (whichever is earlier),
includes the knowing or tacit approval designed to ensure that: and provided that it adheres to the
of the misconduct underlying the (i) The asset management decisions of reporting requirements set forth in this
Conviction); the Northern QPAM are conducted subparagraph (vii);
independently of the management and (2) Within four months of the date of
(b) The Northern QPAMs (including
business activities of NTFS; the Conviction, Northern QPAM must
their officers, directors, agents other (ii) The Northern QPAM fully develop and implement a program of
than Northern, and employees of such complies with ERISA’s fiduciary duties training (the Training), conducted at
Northern QPAMs) did not receive direct and with ERISA and the Code’s least annually, for all relevant Northern
compensation, or knowingly receive prohibited transaction provisions, and QPAM asset/portfolio management,
indirect compensation, in connection does not knowingly participate in any trading, legal, compliance, and internal
with the criminal conduct that is the violations of these duties and provisions audit personnel. The Training must be
subject of the Conviction; with respect to ERISA-covered plans set forth in the Policies and at a
(c) The Northern QPAMs will not and IRAs; minimum, cover the Policies, ERISA
employ or knowingly engage any of the (iii) The Northern QPAM does not and Code compliance (including
individuals that participated in the knowingly participate in any other applicable fiduciary duties and the
criminal conduct that is the subject of person’s violation of ERISA or the Code prohibited transaction provisions),
the Conviction (for purposes of this with respect to ERISA-covered plans ethical conduct, the consequences for
paragraph (c), ‘‘participated in’’ and IRAs; not complying with the conditions of
includes the knowing or tacit approval (iv) Any filings or statements made by this temporary exemption (including
of the misconduct underlying the the Northern QPAM to regulators, any loss of exemptive relief provided
Conviction); including but not limited to, the herein), and prompt reporting of
(d) A Northern QPAM will not use its Department of Labor, the Department of wrongdoing;
authority or influence to direct an the Treasury, the Department of Justice, (i) Effective as of the effective date of
‘‘investment fund,’’ (as defined in and the Pension Benefit Guaranty this temporary exemption, with respect
Section VI(b) of PTE 84–14) that is Corporation, on behalf of ERISA- to any arrangement, agreement, or
subject to ERISA or the Code and covered plans or IRAs are materially contract between a Northern QPAM and
managed by such Northern QPAM, to accurate and complete, to the best of an ERISA-covered plan or IRA for which
enter into any transaction with NTFS or such QPAM’s knowledge at that time; a Northern QPAM provides asset
engage NTFS to provide any service to (v) The Northern QPAM does not management or other discretionary
such investment fund, for a direct or make material misrepresentations or fiduciary services, each Northern QPAM
indirect fee borne by such investment omit material information in its agrees:
fund, regardless of whether such communications with such regulators (1) To comply with ERISA and the
transaction or service may otherwise be with respect to ERISA-covered plans or Code, as applicable with respect to such
within the scope of relief provided by IRAs, or make material ERISA-covered plan or IRA; to refrain
an administrative or statutory misrepresentations or omit material from engaging in prohibited transactions
exemption; information in its communications with that are not otherwise exempt (and to
(e) Any failure of the Northern ERISA-covered plan and IRA clients; promptly correct any inadvertent
QPAMs to satisfy Section I(g) of PTE (vi) The Northern QPAM complies prohibited transactions); and to comply
84–14 arose solely from the Conviction; with the terms of this temporary with the standards of prudence and
exemption; and loyalty set forth in section 404 of ERISA
6 49 FR 9494 (March 13, 1984), as corrected at 50 (vii) Any violation of, or failure to with respect to each such ERISA-
FR 41430 (October 10, 1985), as amended at 70 FR comply with, an item in subparagraph covered plan and IRA;
49305 (August 23, 2005), and as amended at 75 FR (ii) through (vi), is corrected promptly (2) Not to require (or otherwise cause)
38837 (July 6, 2010). upon discovery, and any such violation the ERISA-covered plan or IRA to
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
7 Section I(g) of PTE 84–14 generally provides
that ‘‘[n]either the QPAM nor any affiliate thereof
or compliance failure not promptly waive, limit, or qualify the liability of
. . . nor any owner . . . of a 5 percent or more interest corrected is reported, upon discovering the Northern QPAM for violating ERISA
in the QPAM is a person who within the 10 years the failure to promptly correct, in or the Code or engaging in prohibited
immediately preceding the transaction has been writing, to appropriate corporate transactions;
either convicted or released from imprisonment,
whichever is later, as a result of’’ certain felonies
officers, the head of compliance and the (3) Not to require the ERISA-covered
including income tax evasion, and aiding and General Counsel (or their functional plan or IRA (or sponsor of such ERISA-
abetting tax evasion. equivalent) of the relevant Northern covered plan or beneficial owner of
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:12 Oct 27, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00126 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_75356/page/5.svg)
![75152 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 209 / Friday, October 28, 2016 / Notices
such IRA) to indemnify the Northern (j) The Northern QPAMs comply with subject to Part 4 of Title I of ERISA and
QPAM for violating ERISA or engaging each condition of PTE 84–14, as a plan subject to section 4975 of the
in prohibited transactions, except for amended, with the sole exceptions of Code; and
violations or prohibited transactions the violations of Section I(g) of PTE 84– (e) The term ‘‘Northern’’ means
caused by an error, misrepresentation, 14 that are attributable to the Northern Trust Corporation, together
or misconduct of a plan fiduciary or Conviction; with its current and future affiliates.
other party hired by the plan fiduciary (k) Each Northern QPAM will Effective Date: This temporary
who is independent of Northern; maintain records necessary to exemption is effective for the period
(4) Not to restrict the ability of such demonstrate that the conditions of this beginning on the Conviction Date until
ERISA-covered plan or IRA to terminate temporary exemption have been met, for the earlier of: The date that is twelve
or withdraw from its arrangement with six (6) years following the date of any months following the Conviction Date;
the Northern QPAM (including any transaction for which such Northern or the effective date of a final agency
investment in a separately managed QPAM relies upon the relief in the action made by the Department in
account or pooled fund subject to ERISA temporary exemption; connection with an application for long-
and managed by such QPAM), with the (l) During the effective period of this term exemptive relief for the covered
exception of reasonable restrictions, temporary exemption, Northern Trust: transactions described herein.
appropriately disclosed in advance, that (1) Immediately discloses to the
Department any Deferred Prosecution Supplementary Information
are specifically designed to ensure
equitable treatment of all investors in a Agreement (a DPA) or Non-Prosecution On October 12, 2016, the Department
pooled fund in the event such Agreement (an NPA) that Northern of Labor (the Department) published a
withdrawal or termination may have Trust enters into with the U.S notice of proposed temporary
adverse consequences for all other Department of Justice, to the extent such exemption in the Federal Register at 81
investors as a result of an actual lack of DPA or NPA involves conduct described FR 70562, proposing that certain entities
liquidity of the underlying assets, in Section I(g) of PTE 84–14 or section with specified relationships to NTFS
provided that such restrictions are 411 of ERISA; and (2) immediately could continue to rely upon the relief
applied consistently and in like manner provides the Department any provided by PTE 84–14 (49 FR 9494
to all such investors; information requested by the (March 13, 1984), as corrected at 50 FR
Department, as permitted by law, 41430 (October 10, 1985), as amended at
(5) Not to impose any fees, penalties,
regarding the agreement and/or the 70 FR 49305 (August 23, 2005), and as
or charges for such termination or
conduct and allegations that led to the amended at 75 FR 38837 (July 6, 2010)),
withdrawal with the exception of
agreements; and notwithstanding a judgment of
reasonable fees, appropriately disclosed (m) A Northern QPAM will not fail to
in advance, that are specifically conviction against NTFS for aiding and
meet the terms of this temporary abetting tax fraud, to be entered in
designed to prevent generally exemption, solely because a different
recognized abusive investment practices France in the District Court of Paris (the
Northern QPAM fails to satisfy a
or specifically designed to ensure Conviction, as further defined in
condition for relief under this temporary
equitable treatment of all investors in a Section II(a)),9 for a period of up to
exemption, described in Sections I(c),
pooled fund in the event such twelve months beginning on the date of
(d), (h), (i), (j), and (k).
withdrawal or termination may have the Conviction.
adverse consequences for all other Section II—Definitions The Department is today granting this
investors, provided that such fees are (a) The term ‘‘Conviction’’ means the temporary exemption in order to protect
applied consistently and in like manner potential judgment of conviction against ERISA-covered plans and IRAs from
to all such investors; NTFS for aiding and abetting tax fraud certain costs and/or investment losses
(6) Not to include exculpatory to be entered in France in the District that may arise to the extent entities with
provisions disclaiming or otherwise Court of Paris, French Special a corporate relationship to NTFS lose
limiting liability of the Northern QPAM Prosecutor No. 1120392066, French their ability to rely on PTE 84–14 as of
for a violation of such agreement’s Investigative Judge No. JIRSIF/11/12; the Conviction Date, as described in the
terms, except for liability caused by an (b) The term ‘‘Northern QPAM’’ proposed temporary exemption. The
error, misrepresentation, or misconduct means a ‘‘qualified professional asset Department is considering proposing
of a plan fiduciary or other party hired manager’’ (as defined in section VI(a) 8 longer-term relief for Northern QPAMs
by the plan fiduciary who is of PTE 84–14) that relies on the relief to rely on PTE 84–14 notwithstanding
independent of Northern Trust; and provided by PTE 84–14 and with the Conviction, in Application No. D–
(7) To indemnify and hold harmless respect to which NTFS is a current or 11911. The relief in this temporary
the ERISA-covered plan or IRA for any future ‘‘affiliate’’ (as defined in section exemption provides the Department
damages resulting from a violation of VI(d) of PTE 84–14); more time to consider whether longer-
applicable laws, a breach of contract, or (c) The term ‘‘NTFS’’ means Northern term relief is warranted.
any claim arising out of the failure of Trust Fiduciary Services (Guernsey) ltd., No relief from a violation of any other
such Northern QPAM to qualify for the an affiliate’’ of Northern (as defined in law is provided by this temporary
exemptive relief provided by PTE 84–14 section VI(c) of PTE 84–14) located in exemption, including any criminal
as a result of a violation of Section I(g) Guernsey; conviction described in the proposed
of PTE 84–14 other than the Conviction. (d) The terms ‘‘ERISA-covered plan’’ temporary exemption. Furthermore, the
Within six (6) months of the date of and ‘‘IRA’’ mean, respectively, a plan
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
9 Section I(g) of PTE 84–14 generally provides
the Conviction, each Northern QPAM 8 In that ‘‘[n]either the QPAM nor any affiliate thereof
general terms, a QPAM is an independent
will: Provide a notice of its obligations fiduciary that is a bank, savings and loan . . . nor any owner . . . of a 5 percent or more
under this Section I(i) to each ERISA- association, insurance company, or investment interest in the QPAM is a person who within the
covered plan and IRA for which a adviser that meets certain equity or net worth 10 years immediately preceding the transaction has
requirements and other licensure requirements and been either convicted or released from
Northern QPAM provides asset that has acknowledged in a written management imprisonment, whichever is later, as a result of’’
management or other discretionary agreement that it is a fiduciary with respect to each certain felonies including income tax evasion, and
fiduciary services; plan that has retained the QPAM. aiding and abetting tax evasion.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:12 Oct 27, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00127 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_75356/page/6.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 209 / Friday, October 28, 2016 / Notices 75153
Department cautions that the relief in Department has revised the condition (l) in Section I of the proposed
this temporary exemption will terminate accordingly. temporary exemption. Although the
immediately if, among other things, an Northern Trust seeks deletion of the Department has revised condition (l) in
entity within the Northern corporate requirement in Section I(i) that requires the manner described above, the
structure is convicted of a crime each Northern QPAM to separately Department will continue to consider
described in Section I(g) of PTE 84–14 warrant in writing its obligations to TCH’s comment in connection with its
(other than the Conviction) during the ERISA-Covered Plans and IRAs. While consideration of more permanent relief
effective period of the temporary the Department has made such revision for Northern Trust.
exemption. While such an entity could for purposes of the limited relief herein, After giving full consideration to the
apply for a new exemption in that the Department re-emphasizes, as noted record, the Department has decided to
circumstance, the Department would above, that it may decide to propose grant the temporary exemption, as
not be obligated to grant the exemption. more permanent relief that does not described above. The complete
The terms of this temporary exemption contain this revision. application file (Application No. D–
have been specifically designed to Northern Trust seeks deletion of the 11875) is available for public inspection
permit plans to terminate their requirement set forth in Section I(i)(6) in the Public Disclosure Room of the
relationships in an orderly and cost that, each Northern QPAM agrees: ‘‘Not Employee Benefits Security
effective fashion in the event of an to include exculpatory provisions Administration, Room N–1515, U.S.
additional conviction or a determination disclaiming or otherwise limiting Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
that it is otherwise prudent for a plan to liability of the Northern QPAM for a Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210.
terminate its relationship with an entity violation of such agreement’s terms.’’ For a more complete statement of the
covered by the temporary exemption. The Department declines to make such facts and representations supporting the
deletion, but has revised the condition Department’s decision to grant this
Written Comments to read: ‘‘Not to include exculpatory
temporary exemption, refer to the notice
The Department invited all interested provisions disclaiming or otherwise
of proposed temporary exemption
persons to submit written comments limiting liability of the Northern QPAM
published on October 12, 2016 at 81 FR
and/or requests for a public hearing for a violation of such agreement’s
70569.
with respect to the notice of proposed terms, except for liability caused by an
temporary exemption, published on error, misrepresentation, or misconduct FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
October 12, 2016. All comments and of a plan fiduciary or other party hired Anna Mpras Vaughan of the
requests for hearing were due by by the plan fiduciary who is Department, telephone (202) 693–8565.
October 18, 2016. The Department independent of Northern Trust.’’ (This is not a toll-free number.)
received two written comments, one Condition (l) of the proposed Extension of PTE 2015–15 (the
from Northern Trust, the other from exemption provided that neither Extension) Involving Deutsche Bank AG
Clearing House Association L.L.C. Northern Trust nor any affiliate could (Deutsche Bank), Located in Frankfurt,
(TCH), both of which are described enter into a Deferred Prosecution Germany
below. Agreement (a DPA) or a Non-
Although the Department has revised, Prosecution Agreement (an NPA) with [Prohibited Transaction Exemption 2016–12;
in part, the proposed exemption in the the U.S. Department of Justice, in Exemption Application No. D–11879]
manner requested by Northern Trust, connection with conduct described in Exemption
the Department cautions that it may Section I(g) of PTE 84–14 or section 411
decline to include such revisions in any of ERISA. Northern Trust sought to Section I—Covered Transactions
decision to grant more permanent relief. reserve its right to comment on this Certain asset managers with specified
condition in connection with the relationships to Deutsche Bank
Northern Trust Comment Department’s consideration of more (hereinafter, the DB QPAMs, as further
Northern Trust notes that Section I(h) permanent relief. The Department has defined in Section II(b)) shall not be
of the proposed exemption requires that nonetheless determined to revise precluded from relying on the
each Northern QPAM ‘‘immediately:’’ condition (l), to require that, during the exemptive relief provided by Prohibited
Develop, implement, maintain and effective period of this temporary Transaction Exemption (PTE) 84–14,10
follow certain written policies; and exemption, Northern Trust: (1) notwithstanding a judgment of
develop and implement a program of Immediately discloses to the conviction against Deutsche Securities
training. Northern Trust seeks a period Department any Deferred Prosecution Korea Co., a South Korean affiliate of
of up to four months following the date Agreement (a DPA) or Non-Prosecution Deutsche Bank (hereinafter, DSK, as
of its impending conviction to meet Agreement (an NPA) that Northern further defined in Section II(c)), entered
these requirements. The Department Trust enters into with the U.S. on January 25, 2016 (the Korean
agrees that four months is a reasonable Department of Justice, to the extent such Conviction, as further defined in
period of time with which to comply DPA or NPA involves conduct described Section II(a)),11 provided that the
with the requirement of Section I(h) and in Section I(g) of PTE 84–14 or section following conditions are satisfied:
has revised the condition accordingly. 411 of ERISA; and (2) immediately
Northern Trust seeks another change provides the Department any 10 49 FR 9494 (March 13, 1984), as corrected at
to Section I(h)(1)(i), through the deletion information requested by the 50 FR 41430 (October 10, 1985), as amended at 70
of the bracketed language, ‘‘The asset Department, as permitted by law, FR 49305 (August 23, 2005), and as amended at 75
management decisions of the Northern FR 38837 (July 6, 2010).
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
regarding the agreement and/or the 11 Section I(g) of PTE 84–14 generally provides
QPAM are conducted independently of conduct and allegations that led to the that ‘‘[n]either the QPAM nor any affiliate thereof
the management and business activities agreements. . . . nor any owner . . . of a 5 percent or more
of [Northern, including] NTFS [and interest in the QPAM is a person who within the
Northern’s non-asset management The Clearing House Comment 10 years immediately preceding the transaction has
been either convicted or released from
affiliates.]’’ Northern Trust represents The Clearing House Association imprisonment, whichever is later, as a result of’’
that it has neither committed, nor been L.L.C. (TCH) submitted a comment that certain felonies including income tax evasion and
accused of committing, a crime. The expresses concern regarding condition Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:12 Oct 27, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00128 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_75356/page/7.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 209 / Friday, October 28, 2016 / Notices 75157
Deutsche Bank also seeks changes to Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
the notice requirement described in DC 20210.
Section I(g) of the proposed exemption. Employee Benefits Security
For a more complete statement of the
Deutsche Bank seeks to add the Administration
facts and representations supporting the
following bracketed language, such that Department’s decision to grant this
Section I(g) reads: ‘‘Within two (2) Proposed Extension of Information
Extension, refer to the notice of Collection Requests Submitted for
months of the date of publication of this
proposed extension, published on Public Comment
notice of Extension in the Federal
Register, each DB QPAM will provide a October 12, 2016, at 81 FR 70577.
AGENCY: Employee Benefits Security
notice to such effect to each ERISA- FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Administration, Department of Labor
covered plan or IRA for which a DB Scott Ness of the Department, telephone ACTION: Notice
QPAM provides asset management or (202) 693–8561. (This is not a toll-free
other discretionary fiduciary services [in number.) SUMMARY: The Department of Labor (the
reliance on PTE 84–14], unless such Department), in accordance with the
notice was previously provided General Information Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA
consistent with PTE 2015–15.’’ The 95) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), provides
The attention of interested persons is
Department has revised the condition the general public and Federal agencies
directed to the following:
accordingly. with an opportunity to comment on
Deutsche Bank requests an adjustment (1) The fact that a transaction is the proposed and continuing collections of
to certain restrictions the proposed subject of an exemption under section information. This helps the Department
exemption places on DSK. In this 408(a) of the Act and/or section assess the impact of its information
regard, Deutsche Bank seeks to add the 4975(c)(2) of the Code does not relieve collection requirements and minimize
following bracketed language, and to a fiduciary or other party in interest or the public’s reporting burden. It also
delete the following italicized language, disqualified person from certain other helps the public understand the
such that Section I(m) reads: ‘‘DSK has provisions to which the exemption does Department’s information collection
not, and will not, provide [discretionary not apply and the general fiduciary requirements and provide the requested
asset management services or other responsibility provisions of section 404 data in the desired format. The
discretionary] fiduciary or QPAM of the Act, which among other things Employee Benefits Security
services to ERISA-covered Plans or require a fiduciary to discharge his Administration (EBSA) is soliciting
IRAs, and will not otherwise exercise duties respecting the plan solely in the comments on the proposed extension of
discretionary control over plan assets.’’ interest of the participants and the information collection requests
The Department declines Deutsche beneficiaries of the plan and in a (ICRs) contained in the documents
Bank’s request, but has revised the prudent fashion in accordance with described below. A copy of the ICRs
condition to more clearly require that section 404(a)(1)(B) of the Act; nor does may be obtained by contacting the office
this condition is intended to be met listed in the ADDRESSES section of this
it affect the requirement of section
prospectively, not retroactively. notice. ICRs also are available at
401(a) of the Code that the plan must
Deutsche Bank also seeks clarification reginfo.gov (http://www.reginfo.gov/
operate for the exclusive benefit of the
that for purposes of the Extension, the public/do/PRAMain).
employees of the employer maintaining
auditor, and not the QPAMs, must DATES: Written comments must be
provide the relevant workpapers to the the plan and their beneficiaries;
submitted to the office shown in the
Department. The Department agrees (2) These exemptions are Addresses section on or before
with that interpretation of the condition. supplemental to and not in derogation December 27, 2016.
In its letter to the Department, of, any other provisions of the Act and/
ADDRESSES: G. Christopher Cosby,
Deutsche Bank states that footnotes 38 or the Code, including statutory or
Department of Labor, Employee Benefits
and 42, which reference tax-related administrative exemptions and Security Administration, 200
crimes, are unrelated to Deutsche Bank’s transactional rules. Furthermore, the Constitution Avenue NW., Room
application and should be deleted. fact that a transaction is subject to an N–5718, Washington, DC 20210,
Deutsche Bank also requests that the administrative or statutory exemption is ebsa.opr@dol.gov, (202) 693–8410, FAX
Department note for the record that not dispositive of whether the (202) 693–4745 (these are not toll-free
‘‘Deutsche Bank identified Mr. Ripley transaction is in fact a prohibited numbers).
both as an employee of DBSI and a transaction; and
subject of the Korean case on numerous SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
prior occasions, including as far back as (3) The availability of these notice requests public comment on the
2011, as well as more recently.’’ exemptions is subject to the express Department’s request for extension of
After giving full consideration to the condition that the material facts and the Office of Management and Budget’s
entire record, the Department has representations contained in the (OMB) approval of ICRs contained in
decided to grant the Extension. The application accurately describes all the rules and prohibited transaction
complete application file for the material terms of the transaction which exemptions described below. The
Extension (Exemption Application No. is the subject of the exemption. Department is not proposing any
D–11879), including all supplemental Signed at Washington, DC, this 24th day of changes to the existing ICRs at this time.
submissions received by the An agency may not conduct or sponsor,
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
October, 2016.
Department, as well as the application and a person is not required to respond
Lyssa E. Hall,
file for PTE 2015–15 (Exemption to, an information collection unless it
Director of Exemption Determinations, displays a valid OMB control number. A
Application No. D–11696), are available Employee Benefits Security Administration,
for public inspection in the Public summary of the ICRs and the current
U.S. Department of Labor.
Disclosure Room of the Employee burden estimates follows:
[FR Doc. 2016–26089 Filed 10–27–16; 8:45 am]
Benefits Security Administration, Room Agency: Employee Benefits Security
BILLING CODE 4510–29–P
N–1515, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Administration, Department of Labor.
VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:12 Oct 27, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00132 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_75356/page/11.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-13 16:40:07
Document Modified: 2018-02-13 16:40:07
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Action | Grant of individual exemptions. | |
| Dates | This temporary exemption is effective for the period beginning on the Conviction Date until the earlier of: The date that is twelve months following the Conviction Date; or the effective date of a final agency action made by the Department in connection with an application for long-term exemptive relief for the covered transactions described herein. | |
| Contact | Ms. Anna Mpras Vaughan of the Department, telephone (202) 693-8565. (This is not a toll-free number.) | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 75147 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR