81_FR_75571 81 FR 75361 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of Utah; Revisions to Nonattainment Permitting Regulations

81 FR 75361 - Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; State of Utah; Revisions to Nonattainment Permitting Regulations

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 210 (October 31, 2016)

Page Range75361-75365
FR Document2016-26233

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to conditionally approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the state of Utah on August 20, 2013, with supporting administrative documentation submitted on September 12, 2013. These submittals revise the Utah Administrative Code (UAC) that pertain to the issuance of Utah air quality permits for major sources in nonattainment areas. The EPA proposes a conditional approval because while the submitted revisions to Utah's nonattainment permitting rules do not fully address the deficiencies in the state's program, Utah has committed to address additional remaining deficiencies in the state's nonattainment permitting program no later than a year from the EPA finalizing this conditional approval. If finalized, and upon the EPA finding a timely meeting of this commitment in full, the proposed conditional approval of the SIP revisions would convert to a final approval of Utah's plan. This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) (Act).

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 210 (Monday, October 31, 2016)
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 210 (Monday, October 31, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 75361-75365]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26233]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R08-OAR-2016-0620; FRL-9954-67-Region 8]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
State of Utah; Revisions to Nonattainment Permitting Regulations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
conditionally approve State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions 
submitted by the state of Utah on August 20, 2013, with supporting 
administrative documentation submitted on September 12, 2013. These 
submittals revise the Utah Administrative Code (UAC) that pertain to 
the issuance of Utah air quality permits for major sources in 
nonattainment areas. The EPA proposes a conditional approval because 
while the submitted revisions to Utah's nonattainment permitting rules 
do not fully address the deficiencies in the state's program, Utah has 
committed to address additional remaining deficiencies in the state's 
nonattainment permitting program no later than a year from the EPA 
finalizing this conditional approval. If finalized, and upon the EPA 
finding a timely meeting of this commitment in full, the proposed 
conditional approval of the SIP revisions would convert to a final 
approval of Utah's plan. This action is being taken under section 110 
of the Clean Air Act (CAA) (Act).

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 30, 
2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by EPA-R08-OAR-2016-0620 at 
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for 
submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or 
removed from regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received 
to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you 
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia 
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written 
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and 
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will

[[Page 75362]]

generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of 
the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing 
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment 
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general 
guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some 
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information 
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such 
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. 
Publicly-available docket materials are available at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Region 8, Office of 
Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance, Air Program, 1595 Wynkoop 
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. The EPA requests that if at all 
possible, you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of the docket. You 
may view the hard copy of the docket Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. 
to 4:00 p.m., excluding federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin Leone, Air Program, EPA, Region 
8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, 
(303) 312-6227, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

What should I consider as I prepare my comments for the EPA?

    a. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI to EPA through http://www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the 
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or 
CD ROM that you mail to the EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM 
as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the 
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as 
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information 
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. 
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with 
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    b. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments, 
remember to:
    i. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying 
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to 
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of 
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and 
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information 
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you 
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be 
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and 
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of 
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period 
deadline identified.

II. Background

    On May 10, 2001, the EPA sent Utah a letter outlining concerns that 
Utah's nonattainment permitting rules, which are codified in UAC R307-
403 (Permits: New and Modified Sources in Nonattainment Areas and 
Maintenance Areas), have not been consistent with federal requirements 
(see docket R08-OAR-2016-0620). On August 20, 2013, with supporting 
administrative documentation submitted on September 12, 2013, Utah sent 
the EPA revisions to their nonattainment permitting regulations, 
specifically to address EPA identified deficiencies in their 
nonattainment permitting regulations that affected the EPA's ability to 
approve Utah's PM10 maintenance plan and that may affect the 
EPA's ability to approve of Utah's PM2.5 SIP. These 
revisions addressed R307-403-1 (Purpose and Definitions), R307-403-2 
(Applicability), R307-403-11 (Actual Plant-wide Applicability Limits 
(PALs)), and R307-420 (Ozone Offset Requirements in Davis and Salt Lake 
Counties). In addition, Utah moved R307-401-19 (Analysis of 
Alternatives) to R307-403-10 and moved R307-401-20 (Relaxation of 
Limits) to R307-403-2. On June 2, 2016, the EPA entered into a consent 
decree with the Center for Biological Diversity, Center for 
Environmental Health, and Neighbors for Clean Air regarding a failure 
to act, pursuant to CAA sections 110(k)(2)-(4), on certain complete SIP 
submissions from states intended to address specific requirements 
related to the 2006 p.m.2.5 NAAQS for certain nonattainment 
areas, including the submittal from the Governor of Utah dated August 
20, 2013.
    The SIP revisions submitted by the Utah Department of Air Quality 
(UDAQ) on August 20, 2013, establish specific nonattainment new source 
review permitting requirements. In this revision, the UDAQ has 
incorporated federal regulatory language--establishing permitting 
requirements for new and modified major stationary sources in a 
nonattainment area--from portions of 40 CFR 51.165 and reformatted it 
into state-specific requirements for sources in Utah under R307-403-1 
(Purpose and Definitions) and R307-403-2 (Applicability), including 
provisions relevant to nonattainment NSR programs for PM2.5 
nonattainment areas. Additionally, UDAQ incorporated by reference the 
provisions of 40 CFR 51.165(f)(1)-(f)(14) into 307-403-11 (Actual 
PALs), and revised R307-420 to state that the definitions and 
applicability provisions in R307-403-1 apply to this section.
    CAA section 110(a)(2)(C) requires each state plan to include ``a 
program to provide for . . . regulation of the modification and 
construction of any stationary source within the areas covered by the 
plan as necessary to assure that [NAAQS] are achieved, including a 
permit program as required in parts C and D of this subchapter,'' and 
CAA section 172(c)(5) provides that the plan ``shall require permits 
for the construction and operation of new or modified major stationary 
sources anywhere in the nonattainment area, in accordance with section 
[173].'' CAA section 173 lays out the requirements for obtaining a 
permit that must be included in a state's SIP-approved permit program. 
CAA section 110(a)(2)(A) requires that SIPs contain enforceable 
emissions limitations and other control measures. Under section CAA 
section 110(a)(2), the enforceability requirement in section 
110(a)(2)(A) applies to all plans submitted by a state. CAA section 
110(i) (with certain limited exceptions) prohibits states from 
modifying SIP requirements for stationary sources except through the 
SIP revision process. CAA section 172(c)(7) requires that nonattainment 
plans, including nonattainment New Source Review (NSR) programs 
required by section 172(c)(5), meet the applicable provisions of 
section 110(a)(2), including the requirement in section 110(a)(2)(A) 
for enforceable emission limitations and other control measures. CAA 
section 110(l) provides that the

[[Page 75363]]

EPA cannot approve a SIP revision that interferes with any applicable 
requirement of the Act.
    Section 51.165 in title 40 of the CFR (Permit Requirements) sets 
out the minimum plan requirements states are to meet within each SIP 
nonattainment NSR permitting program. Generally, 40 CFR 51.165 consists 
of a set of definitions, minimum plan requirements regarding procedures 
for determining applicability of nonattainment NSR and use of offsets, 
and minimum plan requirements regarding other source obligations, such 
as recordkeeping.
    Specifically, subparagraphs 51.165(a)(1)(i) through (xlvi) 
enumerate a set of definitions which states must either use or replace 
with definitions that a state demonstrates are more stringent or at 
least as stringent in all respects. Subparagraph 51.165(a)(2) sets 
minimum plan requirements for procedures to determine the applicability 
of the nonattainment NSR program to new and modified sources. 
Subparagraph 51.165(a)(3), (a)(9) and (a)(11) set minimum plan 
requirements for the use of offsets by sources subject to nonattainment 
NSR requirements. Subparagraphs (a)(8) and (a)(10) regard precursors, 
and subparagraphs (a)(6) and (a)(7) regard recordkeeping obligations. 
Subparagraph 51.165(a)(4) allows nonattainment NSR programs to treat 
fugitive emissions in certain ways. Subparagraph 51.165(a)(5) regards 
enforceable procedures for after approval to construct has been 
granted. Subparagraph 51.165(b) sets minimum plan requirements for new 
major stationary sources and major modifications in attainment and 
unclassifiable areas that would cause or contribute to violations of 
the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS.) Finally, 
subparagraph 51.165(f) sets minimum plan requirements for the use of 
PALs. Please refer to docket EPA-R08-OAR-2016-0620 to view a cross-walk 
table which outlines how Utah's nonattainment permitting rules 
correlate with the requirements of 40 CFR 51.165.
    Clean Air Act section 189(e) requires that state SIPs apply the 
same control requirements that apply to major stationary sources of 
PM10 to major stationary sources of PM10 
precursors, ``except where the Administrator determines that such 
sources do not contribute significantly to PM10 levels which 
exceed the standard in the area.'' On January 4, 2013, the U.S. Court 
of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in Natural Resources 
Defense Council v. EPA, 706 F.3d 428 (D.C. Cir. 2013), issued a 
decision that remanded the EPA's 2008 PM2.5 NSR 
Implementation Rule (73 FR 28321). The court found that the EPA erred 
in implementing the PM2.5 NAAQS in these rules solely 
pursuant to the general implementation provisions of subpart 1 of part 
D of title I of the CAA, rather than pursuant to the additional 
implementation provisions specific to particulate matter nonattainment 
areas in subpart 4. In particular, subpart 4 includes section 189(e) of 
the CAA, which requires the control of major stationary sources of 
PM10 precursors (and hence under the court decision, 
PM2.5 precursors) ``except where the Administrator 
determines that such sources do not contribute significantly to 
PM10 levels which exceed the standard in the area.'' 
Accordingly, nonattainment NSR programs that are submitted for 
PM2.5 nonattainment areas must regulate all PM2.5 
precursors, i.e., SO2, NOX, VOC, and ammonia, 
unless the Administrator determines that such sources of a particular 
precursor do not contribute significantly to nonattainment in the 
nonattainment area. The EPA recently finalized a new provision at 40 
CFR 51.165(a)(13) that codifies this requirement, as it applies to 
PM2.5, in the federal regulations.
    As a result, it became clear that Utah needed to submit further 
revisions to address remaining deficiencies in the nonattainment 
permitting program for the EPA to approve the August 20, 2013, 
submittal. Included as part of those deficiencies was that Utah has not 
submitted an analysis demonstrating that sources of ammonia, as a 
PM2.5 precursor, do not contribute significantly to 
PM2.5 levels that exceed the NAAQS in nonattainment areas in 
the State. On September 30, 2016, Utah submitted to EPA a commitment 
letter in which Utah commits to address additional remaining 
deficiencies in the State's nonattainment permitting program in R307-
403 by December 8, 2017, that were not addressed in the August 20, 
2013, submittal, including revisions to R307-403-2, R307-403-3, and 
R307-403-4. In Utah's commitment letter, Utah specifies that:
    1. UDAQ commits to submit a SIP revision that either regulates 
major stationary sources of the pursuant to Utah's nonattainment new 
source review (NNSR) permitting program, consistent with all applicable 
federal regulatory requirements or demonstrates that sources of 
ammonia, as a PM2.5 precursor, do not contribute 
significantly to PM2.5 levels that exceed the NAAQS in 
nonattainment areas in the state, consistent with new provisions at 40 
CFR 51.1006(a)(3);
    2. UDAQ commits to revise R307-403-2 consistent with the new 
definitions in 40 CFR 51.165 that EPA recently finalized in the 
PM2.5 SIP Requirements Rules;
    3. UDAQ commits to revise R307-403-3, including R307-403-3(3), to 
remove the reference to NNSR determinations being made ``at the time of 
the source's proposed start-up date'';
    4. UDAQ commits to revise R307-403-3, including R307-403-3(2) and 
R307-403-3(3), to specify that NNSR permit requirements are applicable 
to all new major stationary sources or major modifications located in a 
nonattainment area that are major for the pollutant for which the area 
is designated nonattainment;
    5. UDAQ commits to revise R307-403-3, in addition to the previously 
adopted definition of lowest achievable emission rate (LAER) in R307-
403-1, to explicitly state that LAER applies to all major new sources 
and major modifications for the relevant pollutants in nonattainment 
areas;
    6. UDAQ commits to revise R307-403-4 to incorporate the 
requirements from 40 CFR 51.165 to establish that all general offset 
permitting requirements apply for all offsets regardless of the 
pollutant at issue, and to revise the provision to impose immediate and 
direct general offset permitting requirements on all new major 
stationary sources or major modifications located in a nonattainment 
area that are major for the pollutant for which the area is designated 
nonattainment;
    7. UDAQ commits to work with the Utah Air Quality Board to revise 
R307-403-4 to reference the criteria discussed in section IV.D. of 40 
CFR 51, Appendix S; and
    8. UDAQ will update R307-403 to include a new section that imposes 
requirements that address emission offsets for PM2.5 
nonattainment areas (as required in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(11)) on NNSR 
sources in Utah. UDAQ will revise R307-403-3, including R307-403-
3(3)(c), to cross reference this new section, as well as the 
requirements in R307-403-4, R307-403-5, and R307-403-6; and UDAQ 
commits to work with the Utah Air Quality Board to revise this section 
to include the requirements of CAA Section 173(c)(1) and 40 CFR 51.165 
(specifically 40 CFR 51.165(a)(3)) concerning the requirement that 
creditable reductions be calculated based on actual emissions for 
offset purposes.
    Under section 110(k)(4) of the Act, the EPA may approve a SIP 
revision based on a commitment by the state to adopt specific 
enforceable measures by a date certain, but not later than one year 
after the date of approval of the plan revision.

[[Page 75364]]

Under a conditional approval, the state must adopt and submit the 
specific revisions it has committed to within one year of the EPA's 
finalization. If the EPA fully approves the submittal of the revisions 
specified in the commitment letter, the conditional nature of the 
approval would be removed and the submittal would become fully 
approved. If the state does not submit these revisions within one year, 
or if the EPA finds the state's revisions to be incomplete, or EPA 
disapproves the state's revisions, a conditional approval will convert 
to a disapproval. If any of these occur and the EPA's conditional 
approval converts to a disapproval, that will constitute a disapproval 
of a required plan element under part D of title I of the Act, which 
starts an 18-month clock for sanctions, see section 179(a)(2), and the 
two-year clock for a federal implementation plan (FIP), see section 
110(c)(1)(B).

III. Proposed Action

    The EPA is proposing to conditionally approve Utah's revisions 
submitted on August 20, 2013, which have not been withdrawn by Utah. 
These revisions addressed R307-403-1 (Purpose and Definitions), R307-
403-2 (Applicability), R307-403-11 (Actual PALs), and R307-420 (Ozone 
Offset Requirements in Davis and Salt Lake Counties). In addition, Utah 
moved R307-401-19 (Analysis of Alternatives) to R307-403-10 and moved 
R307-401-20 (Relaxation of Limits) to R307-403-2. The EPA proposes that 
these changes, when combined with the changes Utah has committed to 
submitting to the EPA by December 8, 2017, in Utah's September 30, 2016 
commitment letter, create enforceable obligations for sources and are 
consistent with the CAA and EPA regulations, including the requirements 
of CAA section 110(a)(2)(A), 110(a)(2)(C), 110(i), 110(l), 172(c)(5), 
172(c)(7), 173.
    The crosswalk table in the docket details how the submittal 
corresponds to specific requirements in 40 CFR 51.165; however, as 
stated earlier, we are not proposing to determine that Utah's 
PM2.5 nonattainment permitting rules meet all requirements 
of 40 CFR 51.165 at this time, but rather are conditionally approving 
these revisions based on Utah's September 30, 2016 commitment letter. 
If we finalize our proposed conditional approval, Utah must adopt and 
submit to the EPA the specific revisions it has committed to by 
December 8, 2017. If the EPA fully approves the submittal of the 
revisions specified in the commitment letter, the conditional nature of 
this proposed approval would be removed and the August 20, 2013 
submittal would, at that time, become fully approved. If Utah does not 
submit these revisions by December 8, 2017, or if we find Utah's 
revisions to be incomplete, or we disapprove Utah's revisions, the 
final conditional approval will convert to a disapproval. If any of 
these occur and our final conditional approval converts to a 
disapproval, that will constitute a disapproval of a required plan 
element under part D of title I of the Act, which starts an 18-month 
clock for sanctions, see CAA section 179(a)(2), and the two-year clock 
for a FIP, see CAA section 110(c)(1)(B).
    Specifically, we are proposing to conditionally approve:

R307-401-19 (Analysis of Alternatives)

    Section R307-401-19 being moved removed from R307-401-19 and being 
added to R307-403-10. Because this section applies only to major 
sources or major modifications that are located in a nonattainment area 
or impact a nonattainment area, this section is more appropriately 
located in R307-403.

R307-401-20 (Relaxation of Limits)

    Section R307-401-20 being moved removed from R307-401-19 and being 
added to R307-403-2. Because this section applies only to major sources 
or major modifications that are located in a nonattainment area or 
impact a nonattainment area, this section is more appropriately located 
in R307-403.

R307-403-1 (Purpose and Definitions)

    Language being added in R307-403-1(1)-(4) to parallel federal 
nonattainment permitting regulations in 40 CFR 51.165; however, Utah 
committed to addressing further deficiencies regarding ammonia as a 
precursor to PM2.5 in this section, as specified in Utah's 
September 30, 2016 commitment letter.
    In particular, R307-403-1(4)(b) states that ``ammonia is not a 
precursor to PM2.5 in the Logan, Salt Lake City, and Provo 
PM2.5 nonattainment areas as defined in the July 1, 2010 
version of 40 CFR 81.345,'' however, UDAQ has not submitted an analysis 
demonstrating that sources of ammonia, as a PM2.5 precursor, 
do not contribute significantly to PM2.5 levels that exceed 
the NAAQS in nonattainment areas in the State. UDAQ committed to submit 
a SIP revision that either regulates major stationary sources of 
ammonia pursuant to Utah's NNSR permitting program, consistent with all 
applicable federal regulatory requirements or demonstrates that sources 
of ammonia, as a PM2.5 precursor, do not contribute 
significantly to PM2.5 levels that exceed the NAAQS in 
nonattainment areas in the State, consistent with new provisions at 40 
CFR 51.1006(a)(3).

R307-403-2 (Applicability)

    The title of this section being changed from ``Emission 
Limitations'' to ``applicability'' and language being added to R307-
403-2(1)-(12) to parallel federal nonattainment permitting regulations 
in 40 CFR 51.165; however, Utah committed to addressing further 
deficiencies in this section in its September 30, 2016 commitment 
letter. Utah committed to revise R307-403-2 consistent with the new 
definitions in 40 CFR 51.165 that the EPA recently finalized in the 
PM2.5 SIP Requirements Rules.
    On September 23, 2016, Utah submitted a letter to the EPA 
requesting to withdraw R307-403-2(12) (see docket EPA-R08-OAR-2016-
0620.) As a result, we will not be acting on that subparagraph.

R307-403-11 (Actuals PALs)

    R307-403-11 being added to implement a portion of the EPA's NSR 
Reform provisions that were adopted in the federal regulations in 2002 
and have not yet been incorporated into the Utah Air Quality Rules. 
R307-403-11 incorporates by reference the provisions of 40 CFR 
51.165(f)(1) through (14).

R307-403-20 (Permits: Ozone Offset Requirements in Davis and Salt Lake 
Counties)

    This rule being revised to include the definitions and 
applicability provisions of R307-403-1. This rule change will ensure 
that the definitions and applicability provisions in R307-420 are 
consistent with related permitting rules in R307-403.
    UDAQ additionally committed to submit a revised SIP by December 8, 
2017 to: (1) Revise R307-403-3, including R307-403-3(3), to remove the 
reference to NNSR determinations being made ``at the time of the 
source's proposed start-up date; (2) revise R307-403-3, including R307-
403-3(2) and R307-403-3(3), to specify that NNSR permit requirements 
are applicable to all new major stationary sources or major 
modifications located in a nonattainment area that are major for the 
pollutant for which the area is designated nonattainment; (3) revise 
R307-403-3, in addition to the previously adopted definition of LAER in 
R307-403-1, to explicitly state that LAER applies to all major new 
sources and major modifications for the relevant pollutants in 
nonattainment areas; (4) revise R307-403-4 to incorporate the 
requirements from 40 CFR 51.165 to

[[Page 75365]]

establish that all general offset permitting requirements apply for all 
offsets regardless of the pollutant at issue, and to revise the 
provision to impose immediate and direct general offset permitting 
requirements on all new major stationary sources or major modifications 
located in a nonattainment area that are major for the pollutant for 
which the area is designated nonattainment; (5) revise R307-403-4 to 
reference the criteria discussed in section IV.D. of 40 CFR 51, 
Appendix S; (6) update R307-403, to include a new section that imposes 
requirements that address emission offsets for PM2.5 
nonattainment areas (as required in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(11)) on NNSR 
sources, and revise R307-403-3, including R307-403-3(3)(c), to cross 
reference this new section, as well as the requirements in R307-403-4, 
R307-403-5, and R307-403-6, and revise this section to include the 
requirements of CAA Section 173(c)(1) and 40 CFR 51.165 (specifically 
40 CFR 51.165(a)(3)) concerning the requirement that creditable 
reductions be calculated based on actual emissions for offset purposes; 
and (7) address further deficiencies regarding ammonia as a precursor 
to PM2.5.

IV. Consideration of Section 110(l) of the CAA

    Under section 110(l) of the CAA, the EPA cannot approve a SIP 
revision if the revision would interfere with any applicable 
requirements concerning attainment and reasonable futher progress (RFP) 
toward attainment of the NAAQS, or any other applicable requirement of 
the Act. In addition, section 110(l) requires that each revision to an 
implementation plan submitted by a state shall be adopted by the state 
after reasonable notice and public hearing.
    The Utah SIP revisions that the EPA is proposing to approve do not 
interfere with any applicable requirements of the Act. The revisions to 
R307-401 and R307-403 submitted by the Utah on August 20, 2013, are 
intended to strengthen the SIP. Therefore, CAA section 110(l) 
requirements are satisfied.

V. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule 
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance 
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by 
reference the UDAQ rules promulgated in the DAR, R307-400 Series as 
discussed in section III of this preamble. The EPA has made, and will 
continue to make, these materials generally available through 
www.regulations.gov and/or at the EPA Region 8 Office (please contact 
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this preamble for more information).

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and 
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely proposes to approve state law as 
meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional 
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this 
proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the CAA; and
     does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority 
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or 
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible 
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and 
will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or 
preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 
November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Intergovernmental relations, Incorporation by reference, Lead, Nitrogen 
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organization compounds.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: October 20, 2016.
Shaun L. McGrath,
Regional Administrator, Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2016-26233 Filed 10-28-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P



                                                                      Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 210 / Monday, October 31, 2016 / Proposed Rules                                          75361

                                               purposes consistent with their                          process to facilitate directly arranged               ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
                                               certification without the permission of                 visits that involve access to unclassified            AGENCY
                                               the controlling DoD office or when                      technical data and technology.
                                               dissemination is:                                       Activities under this process are limited             40 CFR Part 52
                                                 (1) To any foreign recipient for which                to:                                                   [EPA–R08–OAR–2016–0620; FRL–9954–67–
                                               the technical data and technology are                      (1) Procurement activities such as                 Region 8]
                                               approved, authorized, or licensed in                    unclassified pre-solicitation
                                               accordance with 22 U.S.C. 2778 or 15                    conferences, discussions related to                   Approval and Promulgation of Air
                                               CFR parts 730 through 774.                              unclassified solicitations, and collection            Quality Implementation Plans; State of
                                                 (2) To another qualified U.S.                         of procurement unclassified documents.                Utah; Revisions to Nonattainment
                                               contractor including existing or                                                                              Permitting Regulations
                                               potential subcontractors, but only                         (2) Performance of an unclassified
                                               within the scope of the certified                       contract.                                             AGENCY:  Environmental Protection
                                               legitimate business purpose of the                         (3) Scientific research, in support of             Agency (EPA).
                                               recipient.                                              unclassified U.S. or Canadian national                ACTION: Proposed rule.
                                                 (3) To the Departments of State and                   defense initiatives.
                                               Commerce to apply for approvals,                           (4) Attendance at restricted meetings,             SUMMARY:   The Environmental Protection
                                               authorizations, or licenses for export                  conferences, symposia, and program                    Agency (EPA) is proposing to
                                               pursuant to 22 U.S.C. 2778 or 15 CFR                    briefings where technical data and                    conditionally approve State
                                               parts 730 through 774. The application                  technology governed by this part or                   Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
                                               will include a statement that the                       Canada Minister of Justice, Technical                 submitted by the state of Utah on
                                               technical data and technology for which                 Data Control Regulations SOR/86–345,                  August 20, 2013, with supporting
                                               the approval, authorization, or license is              May 27, 2014 current edition will be                  administrative documentation
                                               sought is controlled by the DoD in                      presented, or the event is being held in              submitted on September 12, 2013. These
                                               accordance with this part.                              an unclassified access controlled area.               submittals revise the Utah
                                                 (4) To the Congress or any Federal,                                                                         Administrative Code (UAC) that pertain
                                               State, or local governmental agency for                    (b) A directly arranged visit does not             to the issuance of Utah air quality
                                               regulatory purposes or otherwise as may                 apply to uncertified U.S. or Canadian                 permits for major sources in
                                               be required by law or court order. Any                  contractors; classified visits, where                 nonattainment areas. The EPA proposes
                                               such dissemination will include a                       confirmation of the visitors’ security                a conditional approval because while
                                               statement that the technical data and                   clearances is required; or unsolicited                the submitted revisions to Utah’s
                                               technology are controlled by the DoD in                 marketing visits.                                     nonattainment permitting rules do not
                                               accordance with this part.                                 (c) A directly arranged visit related to           fully address the deficiencies in the
                                                 (j) A qualified contractor desiring to                the release of information controlled in              state’s program, Utah has committed to
                                               disseminate technical data and                          the United States by this part or in                  address additional remaining
                                               technology subject to this part in a                    Canada by Canada Minister of Justice,                 deficiencies in the state’s nonattainment
                                               manner not permitted expressly by the                   Technical Data Control Regulations                    permitting program no later than a year
                                               terms of this part must be granted                      SOR/86–345, May 27, 2014 current                      from the EPA finalizing this conditional
                                               authority to do so by the controlling                   edition, is permitted when two                        approval. If finalized, and upon the EPA
                                               DoD office, consistent with U.S. export                 conditions are satisfied.                             finding a timely meeting of this
                                               control laws and regulations specified                     (1) First condition:                               commitment in full, the proposed
                                               in 22 U.S.C. 2778, 50 U.S.C. chapter 35,                                                                      conditional approval of the SIP
                                                                                                          (i) There is a valid license covering
                                               22 CFR parts 120 through 130, and 15                                                                          revisions would convert to a final
                                                                                                       the export of the technical data and
                                               CFR parts 730 through 774 and DoD                                                                             approval of Utah’s plan. This action is
                                                                                                       technology;
                                               policies.                                                                                                     being taken under section 110 of the
                                                 (k) Any requester denied technical                       (ii) The export or release is permitted            Clean Air Act (CAA) (Act).
                                               data and technology or any qualified                    under the Canadian exemption on 22
                                                                                                                                                             DATES: Written comments must be
                                               U.S. contractor denied permission to                    CFR 126.5;
                                                                                                                                                             received on or before November 30,
                                               disseminate such technical data and                        (iii) The export or release is covered             2016.
                                               technology in accordance with this part                 by the general exemptions in 22 CFR
                                               will be promptly provided with a                        125.4; or                                             ADDRESSES:   Submit your comments,
                                               written statement of reasons for that                                                                         identified by EPA–R08–OAR–2016–
                                                                                                          (iv) The export or release qualifies for           0620 at http://www.regulations.gov.
                                               action, and advised of the right to make                a license exception under 15 CFR parts
                                               a written appeal to a specifically                                                                            Follow the online instructions for
                                                                                                       730 through 774.                                      submitting comments. Once submitted,
                                               identified appellate authority within the
                                               DoD Component. Other appeals will be                       (2) Second condition:                              comments cannot be edited or removed
                                               processed as directed by the                               (i) The distribution statement applied             from regulations.gov. The EPA may
                                               USD(AT&L).                                              to the technical data and technology                  publish any comment received to its
                                                 (l) Denials will cite 10 U.S.C. 130 and               pursuant to DoD Instruction 5230.24                   public docket. Do not submit
                                               133 as implemented by this part.                        permits release; or                                   electronically any information you
                                               Implementing procedures will provide                       (ii) The originator or government                  consider to be Confidential Business
                                                                                                                                                             Information (CBI) or other information
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                               for resolution of any appeal within 20                  controlling office authorizes release.
                                               working days.                                                                                                 whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
                                                                                                         Dated: October 26, 2016.                            Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
                                               § 250.7   Directly arranged visits.                     Aaron Siegel,                                         etc.) must be accompanied by a written
                                                 (a) USG officials and certified U.S.                  Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison                comment. The written comment is
                                               contractors and Canadian government                     Officer, Department of Defense.                       considered the official comment and
                                               officials and certified Canadian                        [FR Doc. 2016–26236 Filed 10–28–16; 8:45 am]          should include discussion of all points
                                               contractors may use the certification                   BILLING CODE 5001–06–P                                you wish to make. The EPA will


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:09 Oct 28, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00015   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM   31OCP1


                                               75362                  Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 210 / Monday, October 31, 2016 / Proposed Rules

                                               generally not consider comments or                         i. Identify the rulemaking by docket               requirements related to the 2006 p.m.2.5
                                               comment contents located outside of the                 number and other identifying                          NAAQS for certain nonattainment areas,
                                               primary submission (i.e., on the Web,                   information (subject heading, Federal                 including the submittal from the
                                               cloud, or other file sharing system). For               Register date and page number).                       Governor of Utah dated August 20,
                                               additional submission methods, the full                    ii. Follow directions—The agency                   2013.
                                               EPA public comment policy,                              may ask you to respond to specific                      The SIP revisions submitted by the
                                               information about CBI or multimedia                     questions or organize comments by                     Utah Department of Air Quality (UDAQ)
                                               submissions, and general guidance on                    referencing a Code of Federal                         on August 20, 2013, establish specific
                                               making effective comments, please visit                 Regulations (CFR) part or section                     nonattainment new source review
                                               http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/                            number.                                               permitting requirements. In this
                                               commenting-epa-dockets.                                    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree;            revision, the UDAQ has incorporated
                                                  Docket: All documents in the docket                  suggest alternatives and substitute                   federal regulatory language—
                                               are listed in the http://                               language for your requested changes.                  establishing permitting requirements for
                                               www.regulations.gov index. Although                        iv. Describe any assumptions and                   new and modified major stationary
                                               listed in the index, some information is                provide any technical information and/                sources in a nonattainment area—from
                                               not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other              or data that you used.                                portions of 40 CFR 51.165 and
                                               information whose disclosure is                            v. If you estimate potential costs or              reformatted it into state-specific
                                               restricted by statute. Certain other                    burdens, explain how you arrived at                   requirements for sources in Utah under
                                               material, such as copyrighted material,                 your estimate in sufficient detail to                 R307–403–1 (Purpose and Definitions)
                                               will be publicly available only in hard                 allow for it to be reproduced.                        and R307–403–2 (Applicability),
                                                                                                          vi. Provide specific examples to                   including provisions relevant to
                                               copy. Publicly-available docket
                                                                                                       illustrate your concerns, and suggest                 nonattainment NSR programs for PM2.5
                                               materials are available at http://
                                                                                                       alternatives.                                         nonattainment areas. Additionally,
                                               www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at                     vii. Explain your views as clearly as
                                               the EPA Region 8, Office of Partnerships                                                                      UDAQ incorporated by reference the
                                                                                                       possible, avoiding the use of profanity               provisions of 40 CFR 51.165(f)(1)–(f)(14)
                                               and Regulatory Assistance, Air Program,                 or personal threats.
                                               1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado                                                                         into 307–403–11 (Actual PALs), and
                                                                                                          viii. Make sure to submit your                     revised R307–420 to state that the
                                               80202–1129. The EPA requests that if at                 comments by the comment period
                                               all possible, you contact the individual                                                                      definitions and applicability provisions
                                                                                                       deadline identified.                                  in R307–403–1 apply to this section.
                                               listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
                                                                                                       II. Background                                          CAA section 110(a)(2)(C) requires
                                               CONTACT section to view the hard copy
                                                                                                                                                             each state plan to include ‘‘a program to
                                               of the docket. You may view the hard                       On May 10, 2001, the EPA sent Utah                 provide for . . . regulation of the
                                               copy of the docket Monday through                       a letter outlining concerns that Utah’s               modification and construction of any
                                               Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., excluding               nonattainment permitting rules, which                 stationary source within the areas
                                               federal holidays.                                       are codified in UAC R307–403 (Permits:                covered by the plan as necessary to
                                               FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:                        New and Modified Sources in                           assure that [NAAQS] are achieved,
                                               Kevin Leone, Air Program, EPA, Region                   Nonattainment Areas and Maintenance                   including a permit program as required
                                               8, Mailcode 8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop                         Areas), have not been consistent with                 in parts C and D of this subchapter,’’
                                               Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129,                    federal requirements (see docket R08–                 and CAA section 172(c)(5) provides that
                                               (303) 312–6227, leone.kevin@epa.gov.                    OAR–2016–0620). On August 20, 2013,                   the plan ‘‘shall require permits for the
                                               SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
                                                                                                       with supporting administrative                        construction and operation of new or
                                                                                                       documentation submitted on September                  modified major stationary sources
                                               I. General Information                                  12, 2013, Utah sent the EPA revisions to              anywhere in the nonattainment area, in
                                               What should I consider as I prepare my                  their nonattainment permitting                        accordance with section [173].’’ CAA
                                               comments for the EPA?                                   regulations, specifically to address EPA              section 173 lays out the requirements
                                                                                                       identified deficiencies in their                      for obtaining a permit that must be
                                                 a. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI                  nonattainment permitting regulations                  included in a state’s SIP-approved
                                               to EPA through http://                                  that affected the EPA’s ability to                    permit program. CAA section
                                               www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly                   approve Utah’s PM10 maintenance plan                  110(a)(2)(A) requires that SIPs contain
                                               mark the part or all of the information                 and that may affect the EPA’s ability to              enforceable emissions limitations and
                                               that you claim to be CBI. For CBI                       approve of Utah’s PM2.5 SIP. These                    other control measures. Under section
                                               information in a disk or CD ROM that                    revisions addressed R307–403–1                        CAA section 110(a)(2), the
                                               you mail to the EPA, mark the outside                   (Purpose and Definitions), R307–403–2                 enforceability requirement in section
                                               of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then                   (Applicability), R307–403–11 (Actual                  110(a)(2)(A) applies to all plans
                                               identify electronically within the disk or              Plant-wide Applicability Limits (PALs)),              submitted by a state. CAA section 110(i)
                                               CD ROM the specific information that is                 and R307–420 (Ozone Offset                            (with certain limited exceptions)
                                               claimed as CBI. In addition to one                      Requirements in Davis and Salt Lake                   prohibits states from modifying SIP
                                               complete version of the comment that                    Counties). In addition, Utah moved                    requirements for stationary sources
                                               includes information claimed as CBI, a                  R307–401–19 (Analysis of Alternatives)                except through the SIP revision process.
                                               copy of the comment that does not                       to R307–403–10 and moved R307–401–                    CAA section 172(c)(7) requires that
                                               contain the information claimed as CBI                  20 (Relaxation of Limits) to R307–403–                nonattainment plans, including
                                               must be submitted for inclusion in the                  2. On June 2, 2016, the EPA entered into              nonattainment New Source Review
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                               public docket. Information so marked                    a consent decree with the Center for                  (NSR) programs required by section
                                               will not be disclosed except in                         Biological Diversity, Center for                      172(c)(5), meet the applicable
                                               accordance with procedures set forth in                 Environmental Health, and Neighbors                   provisions of section 110(a)(2),
                                               40 CFR part 2.                                          for Clean Air regarding a failure to act,             including the requirement in section
                                                 b. Tips for Preparing Your Comments.                  pursuant to CAA sections 110(k)(2)–(4),               110(a)(2)(A) for enforceable emission
                                               When submitting comments, remember                      on certain complete SIP submissions                   limitations and other control measures.
                                               to:                                                     from states intended to address specific              CAA section 110(l) provides that the


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:09 Oct 28, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00016   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM   31OCP1


                                                                      Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 210 / Monday, October 31, 2016 / Proposed Rules                                          75363

                                               EPA cannot approve a SIP revision that                  Implementation Rule (73 FR 28321).                    definitions in 40 CFR 51.165 that EPA
                                               interferes with any applicable                          The court found that the EPA erred in                 recently finalized in the PM2.5 SIP
                                               requirement of the Act.                                 implementing the PM2.5 NAAQS in                       Requirements Rules;
                                                  Section 51.165 in title 40 of the CFR                these rules solely pursuant to the                       3. UDAQ commits to revise R307–
                                               (Permit Requirements) sets out the                      general implementation provisions of                  403–3, including R307–403–3(3), to
                                               minimum plan requirements states are                    subpart 1 of part D of title I of the CAA,            remove the reference to NNSR
                                               to meet within each SIP nonattainment                   rather than pursuant to the additional                determinations being made ‘‘at the time
                                               NSR permitting program. Generally, 40                   implementation provisions specific to                 of the source’s proposed start-up date’’;
                                               CFR 51.165 consists of a set of                         particulate matter nonattainment areas                   4. UDAQ commits to revise R307–
                                               definitions, minimum plan                               in subpart 4. In particular, subpart 4                403–3, including R307–403–3(2) and
                                               requirements regarding procedures for                   includes section 189(e) of the CAA,                   R307–403–3(3), to specify that NNSR
                                               determining applicability of                            which requires the control of major                   permit requirements are applicable to
                                               nonattainment NSR and use of offsets,                   stationary sources of PM10 precursors                 all new major stationary sources or
                                               and minimum plan requirements                           (and hence under the court decision,                  major modifications located in a
                                               regarding other source obligations, such                PM2.5 precursors) ‘‘except where the                  nonattainment area that are major for
                                               as recordkeeping.                                       Administrator determines that such                    the pollutant for which the area is
                                                  Specifically, subparagraphs                          sources do not contribute significantly               designated nonattainment;
                                               51.165(a)(1)(i) through (xlvi) enumerate                to PM10 levels which exceed the                          5. UDAQ commits to revise R307–
                                               a set of definitions which states must                  standard in the area.’’ Accordingly,                  403–3, in addition to the previously
                                               either use or replace with definitions                  nonattainment NSR programs that are                   adopted definition of lowest achievable
                                               that a state demonstrates are more                      submitted for PM2.5 nonattainment areas               emission rate (LAER) in R307–403–1, to
                                               stringent or at least as stringent in all               must regulate all PM2.5 precursors, i.e.,             explicitly state that LAER applies to all
                                               respects. Subparagraph 51.165(a)(2) sets                SO2, NOX, VOC, and ammonia, unless                    major new sources and major
                                               minimum plan requirements for                           the Administrator determines that such                modifications for the relevant pollutants
                                               procedures to determine the                             sources of a particular precursor do not              in nonattainment areas;
                                               applicability of the nonattainment NSR                  contribute significantly to                              6. UDAQ commits to revise R307–
                                               program to new and modified sources.                    nonattainment in the nonattainment                    403–4 to incorporate the requirements
                                               Subparagraph 51.165(a)(3), (a)(9) and                   area. The EPA recently finalized a new                from 40 CFR 51.165 to establish that all
                                               (a)(11) set minimum plan requirements                   provision at 40 CFR 51.165(a)(13) that                general offset permitting requirements
                                               for the use of offsets by sources subject               codifies this requirement, as it applies              apply for all offsets regardless of the
                                               to nonattainment NSR requirements.                      to PM2.5, in the federal regulations.                 pollutant at issue, and to revise the
                                               Subparagraphs (a)(8) and (a)(10) regard                    As a result, it became clear that Utah             provision to impose immediate and
                                               precursors, and subparagraphs (a)(6)                    needed to submit further revisions to                 direct general offset permitting
                                               and (a)(7) regard recordkeeping                         address remaining deficiencies in the                 requirements on all new major
                                               obligations. Subparagraph 51.165(a)(4)                  nonattainment permitting program for                  stationary sources or major
                                               allows nonattainment NSR programs to                    the EPA to approve the August 20, 2013,               modifications located in a
                                               treat fugitive emissions in certain ways.               submittal. Included as part of those                  nonattainment area that are major for
                                               Subparagraph 51.165(a)(5) regards                       deficiencies was that Utah has not                    the pollutant for which the area is
                                               enforceable procedures for after                        submitted an analysis demonstrating                   designated nonattainment;
                                               approval to construct has been granted.                 that sources of ammonia, as a PM2.5                      7. UDAQ commits to work with the
                                               Subparagraph 51.165(b) sets minimum                     precursor, do not contribute                          Utah Air Quality Board to revise R307–
                                               plan requirements for new major                         significantly to PM2.5 levels that exceed             403–4 to reference the criteria discussed
                                               stationary sources and major                            the NAAQS in nonattainment areas in                   in section IV.D. of 40 CFR 51, Appendix
                                               modifications in attainment and                         the State. On September 30, 2016, Utah                S; and
                                               unclassifiable areas that would cause or                submitted to EPA a commitment letter                     8. UDAQ will update R307–403 to
                                               contribute to violations of the national                in which Utah commits to address                      include a new section that imposes
                                               ambient air quality standards (NAAQS.)                  additional remaining deficiencies in the              requirements that address emission
                                               Finally, subparagraph 51.165(f) sets                    State’s nonattainment permitting                      offsets for PM2.5 nonattainment areas (as
                                               minimum plan requirements for the use                   program in R307–403 by December 8,                    required in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(11)) on
                                               of PALs. Please refer to docket EPA–                    2017, that were not addressed in the                  NNSR sources in Utah. UDAQ will
                                               R08–OAR–2016–0620 to view a cross-                      August 20, 2013, submittal, including                 revise R307–403–3, including R307–
                                               walk table which outlines how Utah’s                    revisions to R307–403–2, R307–403–3,                  403–3(3)(c), to cross reference this new
                                               nonattainment permitting rules correlate                and R307–403–4. In Utah’s commitment                  section, as well as the requirements in
                                               with the requirements of 40 CFR 51.165.                 letter, Utah specifies that:                          R307–403–4, R307–403–5, and R307–
                                                  Clean Air Act section 189(e) requires                   1. UDAQ commits to submit a SIP                    403–6; and UDAQ commits to work
                                               that state SIPs apply the same control                  revision that either regulates major                  with the Utah Air Quality Board to
                                               requirements that apply to major                        stationary sources of the pursuant to                 revise this section to include the
                                               stationary sources of PM10 to major                     Utah’s nonattainment new source                       requirements of CAA Section 173(c)(1)
                                               stationary sources of PM10 precursors,                  review (NNSR) permitting program,                     and 40 CFR 51.165 (specifically 40 CFR
                                               ‘‘except where the Administrator                        consistent with all applicable federal                51.165(a)(3)) concerning the
                                               determines that such sources do not                     regulatory requirements or demonstrates               requirement that creditable reductions
                                               contribute significantly to PM10 levels                 that sources of ammonia, as a PM2.5                   be calculated based on actual emissions
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                               which exceed the standard in the area.’’                precursor, do not contribute                          for offset purposes.
                                               On January 4, 2013, the U.S. Court of                   significantly to PM2.5 levels that exceed                Under section 110(k)(4) of the Act, the
                                               Appeals for the District of Columbia                    the NAAQS in nonattainment areas in                   EPA may approve a SIP revision based
                                               Circuit, in Natural Resources Defense                   the state, consistent with new                        on a commitment by the state to adopt
                                               Council v. EPA, 706 F.3d 428 (D.C. Cir.                 provisions at 40 CFR 51.1006(a)(3);                   specific enforceable measures by a date
                                               2013), issued a decision that remanded                     2. UDAQ commits to revise R307–                    certain, but not later than one year after
                                               the EPA’s 2008 PM2.5 NSR                                403–2 consistent with the new                         the date of approval of the plan revision.


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:09 Oct 28, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00017   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM   31OCP1


                                               75364                  Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 210 / Monday, October 31, 2016 / Proposed Rules

                                               Under a conditional approval, the state                 August 20, 2013 submittal would, at                   the NAAQS in nonattainment areas in
                                               must adopt and submit the specific                      that time, become fully approved. If                  the State, consistent with new
                                               revisions it has committed to within one                Utah does not submit these revisions by               provisions at 40 CFR 51.1006(a)(3).
                                               year of the EPA’s finalization. If the EPA              December 8, 2017, or if we find Utah’s
                                                                                                                                                             R307–403–2 (Applicability)
                                               fully approves the submittal of the                     revisions to be incomplete, or we
                                               revisions specified in the commitment                   disapprove Utah’s revisions, the final                   The title of this section being changed
                                               letter, the conditional nature of the                   conditional approval will convert to a                from ‘‘Emission Limitations’’ to
                                               approval would be removed and the                       disapproval. If any of these occur and                ‘‘applicability’’ and language being
                                               submittal would become fully approved.                  our final conditional approval converts               added to R307–403–2(1)–(12) to parallel
                                               If the state does not submit these                      to a disapproval, that will constitute a              federal nonattainment permitting
                                               revisions within one year, or if the EPA                disapproval of a required plan element                regulations in 40 CFR 51.165; however,
                                               finds the state’s revisions to be                       under part D of title I of the Act, which             Utah committed to addressing further
                                               incomplete, or EPA disapproves the                      starts an 18-month clock for sanctions,               deficiencies in this section in its
                                               state’s revisions, a conditional approval               see CAA section 179(a)(2), and the two-               September 30, 2016 commitment letter.
                                               will convert to a disapproval. If any of                year clock for a FIP, see CAA section                 Utah committed to revise R307–403–2
                                               these occur and the EPA’s conditional                   110(c)(1)(B).                                         consistent with the new definitions in
                                               approval converts to a disapproval, that                  Specifically, we are proposing to                   40 CFR 51.165 that the EPA recently
                                               will constitute a disapproval of a                      conditionally approve:                                finalized in the PM2.5 SIP Requirements
                                               required plan element under part D of                                                                         Rules.
                                                                                                       R307–401–19 (Analysis of Alternatives)                   On September 23, 2016, Utah
                                               title I of the Act, which starts an 18-
                                               month clock for sanctions, see section                    Section R307–401–19 being moved                     submitted a letter to the EPA requesting
                                               179(a)(2), and the two-year clock for a                 removed from R307–401–19 and being                    to withdraw R307–403–2(12) (see
                                               federal implementation plan (FIP), see                  added to R307–403–10. Because this                    docket EPA–R08–OAR–2016–0620.) As
                                               section 110(c)(1)(B).                                   section applies only to major sources or              a result, we will not be acting on that
                                                                                                       major modifications that are located in               subparagraph.
                                               III. Proposed Action                                    a nonattainment area or impact a
                                                  The EPA is proposing to conditionally                                                                      R307–403–11 (Actuals PALs)
                                                                                                       nonattainment area, this section is more
                                               approve Utah’s revisions submitted on                   appropriately located in R307–403.                      R307–403–11 being added to
                                               August 20, 2013, which have not been                                                                          implement a portion of the EPA’s NSR
                                               withdrawn by Utah. These revisions                      R307–401–20 (Relaxation of Limits)                    Reform provisions that were adopted in
                                               addressed R307–403–1 (Purpose and                         Section R307–401–20 being moved                     the federal regulations in 2002 and have
                                               Definitions), R307–403–2                                removed from R307–401–19 and being                    not yet been incorporated into the Utah
                                               (Applicability), R307–403–11 (Actual                    added to R307–403–2. Because this                     Air Quality Rules. R307–403–11
                                               PALs), and R307–420 (Ozone Offset                       section applies only to major sources or              incorporates by reference the provisions
                                               Requirements in Davis and Salt Lake                     major modifications that are located in               of 40 CFR 51.165(f)(1) through (14).
                                               Counties). In addition, Utah moved                      a nonattainment area or impact a
                                                                                                                                                             R307–403–20 (Permits: Ozone Offset
                                               R307–401–19 (Analysis of Alternatives)                  nonattainment area, this section is more
                                                                                                                                                             Requirements in Davis and Salt Lake
                                               to R307–403–10 and moved R307–401–                      appropriately located in R307–403.
                                                                                                                                                             Counties)
                                               20 (Relaxation of Limits) to R307–403–
                                                                                                       R307–403–1 (Purpose and Definitions)                     This rule being revised to include the
                                               2. The EPA proposes that these changes,
                                               when combined with the changes Utah                       Language being added in R307–403–                   definitions and applicability provisions
                                               has committed to submitting to the EPA                  1(1)–(4) to parallel federal                          of R307–403–1. This rule change will
                                               by December 8, 2017, in Utah’s                          nonattainment permitting regulations in               ensure that the definitions and
                                               September 30, 2016 commitment letter,                   40 CFR 51.165; however, Utah                          applicability provisions in R307–420 are
                                               create enforceable obligations for                      committed to addressing further                       consistent with related permitting rules
                                               sources and are consistent with the CAA                 deficiencies regarding ammonia as a                   in R307–403.
                                               and EPA regulations, including the                      precursor to PM2.5 in this section, as                   UDAQ additionally committed to
                                               requirements of CAA section                             specified in Utah’s September 30, 2016                submit a revised SIP by December 8,
                                               110(a)(2)(A), 110(a)(2)(C), 110(i), 110(l),             commitment letter.                                    2017 to: (1) Revise R307–403–3,
                                               172(c)(5), 172(c)(7), 173.                                In particular, R307–403–1(4)(b) states              including R307–403–3(3), to remove the
                                                  The crosswalk table in the docket                    that ‘‘ammonia is not a precursor to                  reference to NNSR determinations being
                                               details how the submittal corresponds                   PM2.5 in the Logan, Salt Lake City, and               made ‘‘at the time of the source’s
                                               to specific requirements in 40 CFR                      Provo PM2.5 nonattainment areas as                    proposed start-up date; (2) revise R307–
                                               51.165; however, as stated earlier, we                  defined in the July 1, 2010 version of 40             403–3, including R307–403–3(2) and
                                               are not proposing to determine that                     CFR 81.345,’’ however, UDAQ has not                   R307–403–3(3), to specify that NNSR
                                               Utah’s PM2.5 nonattainment permitting                   submitted an analysis demonstrating                   permit requirements are applicable to
                                               rules meet all requirements of 40 CFR                   that sources of ammonia, as a PM2.5                   all new major stationary sources or
                                               51.165 at this time, but rather are                     precursor, do not contribute                          major modifications located in a
                                               conditionally approving these revisions                 significantly to PM2.5 levels that exceed             nonattainment area that are major for
                                               based on Utah’s September 30, 2016                      the NAAQS in nonattainment areas in                   the pollutant for which the area is
                                               commitment letter. If we finalize our                   the State. UDAQ committed to submit a                 designated nonattainment; (3) revise
                                               proposed conditional approval, Utah                     SIP revision that either regulates major              R307–403–3, in addition to the
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                               must adopt and submit to the EPA the                    stationary sources of ammonia pursuant                previously adopted definition of LAER
                                               specific revisions it has committed to by               to Utah’s NNSR permitting program,                    in R307–403–1, to explicitly state that
                                               December 8, 2017. If the EPA fully                      consistent with all applicable federal                LAER applies to all major new sources
                                               approves the submittal of the revisions                 regulatory requirements or demonstrates               and major modifications for the relevant
                                               specified in the commitment letter, the                 that sources of ammonia, as a PM2.5                   pollutants in nonattainment areas; (4)
                                               conditional nature of this proposed                     precursor, do not contribute                          revise R307–403–4 to incorporate the
                                               approval would be removed and the                       significantly to PM2.5 levels that exceed             requirements from 40 CFR 51.165 to


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:09 Oct 28, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00018   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM   31OCP1


                                                                      Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 210 / Monday, October 31, 2016 / Proposed Rules                                               75365

                                               establish that all general offset                       the EPA Region 8 Office (please contact               tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
                                               permitting requirements apply for all                   the person identified in the FOR FURTHER              Indian country, the proposed rule does
                                               offsets regardless of the pollutant at                  INFORMATION CONTACT section of this                   not have tribal implications and will not
                                               issue, and to revise the provision to                   preamble for more information).                       impose substantial direct costs on tribal
                                               impose immediate and direct general                                                                           governments or preempt tribal law as
                                               offset permitting requirements on all                   VI. Statutory and Executive Order
                                                                                                                                                             specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
                                               new major stationary sources or major                   Reviews
                                                                                                                                                             FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
                                               modifications located in a                                 Under the Clean Air Act, the
                                               nonattainment area that are major for                   Administrator is required to approve a                List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
                                               the pollutant for which the area is                     SIP submission that complies with the                   Environmental protection, Air
                                               designated nonattainment; (5) revise                    provisions of the Act and applicable                  pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
                                               R307–403–4 to reference the criteria                    federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);               Intergovernmental relations,
                                               discussed in section IV.D. of 40 CFR 51,                40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP               Incorporation by reference, Lead,
                                               Appendix S; (6) update R307–403, to                     submissions, the EPA’s role is to                     Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
                                               include a new section that imposes                      approve state choices, provided that                  matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
                                               requirements that address emission                      they meet the criteria of the Clean Air               requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
                                               offsets for PM2.5 nonattainment areas (as               Act. Accordingly, this action merely                  organization compounds.
                                               required in 40 CFR 51.165(a)(11)) on                    proposes to approve state law as                        Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
                                               NNSR sources, and revise R307–403–3,                    meeting federal requirements and does
                                               including R307–403–3(3)(c), to cross                    not impose additional requirements                      Dated: October 20, 2016.
                                               reference this new section, as well as                  beyond those imposed by state law. For                Shaun L. McGrath,
                                               the requirements in R307–403–4, R307–                   that reason, this proposed action:                    Regional Administrator, Region 8.
                                               403–5, and R307–403–6, and revise this                     • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory                [FR Doc. 2016–26233 Filed 10–28–16; 8:45 am]
                                               section to include the requirements of                  action’’ subject to review by the Office              BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
                                               CAA Section 173(c)(1) and 40 CFR                        of Management and Budget under
                                               51.165 (specifically 40 CFR 51.165(a)(3))               Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
                                               concerning the requirement that                         October 4, 1993);                                     ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
                                               creditable reductions be calculated                        • does not impose an information                   AGENCY
                                               based on actual emissions for offset                    collection burden under the provisions
                                               purposes; and (7) address further                       of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44                    40 CFR Part 63
                                               deficiencies regarding ammonia as a                     U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);                                 [EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0234; FRL–9954–62–
                                               precursor to PM2.5.                                        • is certified as not having a                     OAR]
                                                                                                       significant economic impact on a
                                               IV. Consideration of Section 110(l) of                  substantial number of small entities                  RIN 2060–AS75
                                               the CAA
                                                                                                       under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
                                                  Under section 110(l) of the CAA, the                                                                       Mercury and Air Toxics Standards
                                                                                                       U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
                                                                                                                                                             (MATS) Completion of Electronic
                                               EPA cannot approve a SIP revision if the                   • does not contain any unfunded
                                               revision would interfere with any                                                                             Reporting Requirements
                                                                                                       mandate or significantly or uniquely
                                               applicable requirements concerning                      affect small governments, as described                AGENCY:  Environmental Protection
                                               attainment and reasonable futher                        in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act                   Agency (EPA).
                                               progress (RFP) toward attainment of the                 of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);                              ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of
                                               NAAQS, or any other applicable                             • does not have federalism                         comment period.
                                               requirement of the Act. In addition,                    implications as specified in Executive
                                               section 110(l) requires that each revision              Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,                  SUMMARY:   On September 29, 2016, the
                                               to an implementation plan submitted by                  1999);                                                Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
                                               a state shall be adopted by the state after                • is not an economically significant               proposed a rule titled, ‘‘Mercury and Air
                                               reasonable notice and public hearing.                   regulatory action based on health or                  Toxics Standards (MATS) Completion
                                                  The Utah SIP revisions that the EPA                  safety risks subject to Executive Order               of Electronic Reporting Requirements.’’
                                               is proposing to approve do not interfere                13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);                  The EPA is extending the comment
                                               with any applicable requirements of the                    • is not a significant regulatory action           period on the proposed rule that was
                                               Act. The revisions to R307–401 and                      subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR               scheduled to close on October 31, 2016,
                                               R307–403 submitted by the Utah on                       28355, May 22, 2001);                                 by 15 days until November 15, 2016.
                                               August 20, 2013, are intended to                           • is not subject to requirements of                The EPA is making this change based on
                                               strengthen the SIP. Therefore, CAA                      Section 12(d) of the National                         three requests for additional time to
                                               section 110(l) requirements are satisfied.              Technology Transfer and Advancement                   prepare comments on this proposed
                                                                                                       Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because              rule.
                                               V. Incorporation by Reference                           application of those requirements would
                                                 In this rule, the EPA is proposing to                 be inconsistent with the CAA; and                     DATES:  The public comment period for
                                               include in a final EPA rule regulatory                     • does not provide the EPA with the                the proposed rule published in the
                                               text that includes incorporation by                     discretionary authority to address, as                Federal Register on September 29, 2016
                                               reference. In accordance with                           appropriate, disproportionate human                   (81 FR 67062), is being extended.
                                               requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is                  health or environmental effects, using                Written comments must be received on
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with PROPOSALS




                                               proposing to incorporate by reference                   practicable and legally permissible                   or before November 15, 2016.
                                               the UDAQ rules promulgated in the                       methods, under Executive Order 12898                  ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
                                               DAR, R307–400 Series as discussed in                    (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).                      docket for the proposed rulemaking
                                               section III of this preamble. The EPA                      In addition, the SIP is not approved               (available at http://
                                               has made, and will continue to make,                    to apply on any Indian reservation land               www.regulations.gov). The Docket ID
                                               these materials generally available                     or in any other area where the EPA or                 No. is EPA–HQ–OAR–2009–0234.
                                               through www.regulations.gov and/or at                   an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a               Submit your comments, identified by


                                          VerDate Sep<11>2014   14:09 Oct 28, 2016   Jkt 241001   PO 00000   Frm 00019   Fmt 4702   Sfmt 4702   E:\FR\FM\31OCP1.SGM   31OCP1



Document Created: 2018-02-02 12:13:22
Document Modified: 2018-02-02 12:13:22
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionProposed Rules
ActionProposed rule.
DatesWritten comments must be received on or before November 30, 2016.
ContactKevin Leone, Air Program, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode 8P-AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129, (303) 312-6227, [email protected]
FR Citation81 FR 75361 
CFR AssociatedEnvironmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Carbon Monoxide; Intergovernmental Relations; Incorporation by Reference; Lead; Nitrogen Dioxide; Ozone; Particulate Matter; Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements; Sulfur Oxides and Volatile Organization Compounds

2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR