81 FR 7751 - Potassium Permanganate From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the 2014 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 30 (February 16, 2016)
International Trade Administration
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 30 (February 16, 2016)
| Page Range | 7751-7753 | |
| FR Document | 2016-03073 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 16, 2016)] [Notices] [Pages 7751-7753] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-03073] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A-570-001] Potassium Permanganate From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the 2014 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: In response to a request by Pacific Accelerator Limited (``PAL''), the Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty (``AD'') order on potassium permanganate from the People's Republic of China (the ``PRC'') for the period of review (``POR'') January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014.\1\ The Department preliminarily determines that PAL sold subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal value (``NV'') during the POR. If these preliminary results are adopted in the final results, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise during the POR. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See Antidumping Duty Order: Potassium Permanganate from the People's Republic of China, 49 FR 3897 (January 31, 1984). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATES: Effective February 16, 2016. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Walker or Javier Barrientos, AD/ CVD [[Page 7752]] Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone 202-482-0413 or 202-482-2243, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On March 2, 2015, the Department initiated an administrative review of the antidumping order on potassium permanganate from the PRC.\2\ Between April and September 2015, the Department sent AD questionnaires and supplemental questionnaires to PAL, to which it responded in a timely manner. On October 5, 2015, the Department partially extended the deadline for issuing the preliminary results until November 2, 2015.\3\ On October 27, 2015, the Department fully extended the deadline for issuing the preliminary results until February 1, 2016.\4\ As explained in the memorandum from the Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, the Department has exercised its discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due to the recent closure of the Federal Government. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by four business days. The revised deadline for the preliminary results of this administrative review is now February 5, 2016.\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 11166 (March 2, 2015) (``Initiation Notice''). \3\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Potassium Permanganate from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of 2014 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated October 5, 2015. \4\ See Memorandum to Christian Marsh, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, ``Potassium Permanganate from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of 2014 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,'' dated October 27, 2015. \5\ See Memorandum to the Record from Ron Lorentzen, Acting A/S for Enforcement & Compliance, regarding ``Tolling of Administrative Deadlines As a Result of the Government Closure During Snowstorm Jonas,'' dated January 27, 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scope of the Order Imports covered by the order are shipments of potassium permanganate, an inorganic chemical produced in free-flowing, technical, and pharmaceutical grades. Potassium permanganate is currently classifiable under item 2841.61.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (``HTSUS''). Although the HTSUS item number is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise remains dispositive. Methodology The Department conducted this review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1)(B) and 751(a)(2)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the ``Act''). Export prices have been calculated in accordance with section 772 of the Act. Because the PRC is a non-market economy (``NME'') within the meaning of section 771(18) of the Act, NV has been calculated in accordance with section 773(c) of the Act. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement aCnd Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (``ACCESS''). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov, and is available to all parties in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content. PRC-Wide Entity The Department's change in policy regarding conditional review of the PRC-wide entity applies to this administrative review.\6\ Under this policy, the PRC-wide entity will not be under review unless a party specifically requests, or the Department self-initiates, a review of the entity. Because no party requested a review of the PRC-wide entity in this review, the entity is not under review and the entity's rate (i.e., 128.94 percent) is not subject to change. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \6\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Preliminary Results of Review The Department preliminarily determines that the following weighted-average dumping margins exist for the period January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Weighted- average Exporter margin (USD/ kilogram) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Pacific Accelerator Limited................................. 2.20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Disclosure, Public Comment and Opportunity To Request a Hearing The Department will disclose the calculations used in our analysis to parties in this review within five days of the date of publication of this notice in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Interested parties may submit case briefs within 30 days after the date of publication of these preliminary results of review in the Federal Register.\7\ Rebuttals to case briefs, which must be limited to issues raised in the case briefs, must be filed within five days after the time limit for filing case briefs.\8\ Parties who submit arguments are requested to submit with the argument (a) a statement of the issue, (b) a brief summary of the argument, and (c) a table of authorities.\9\ Parties submitting briefs should do so pursuant to the Department's electronic filing system, ACCESS. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \7\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii). \8\ See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(1)-(2). \9\ See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2), (d)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), interested parties who wish to request a hearing must submit a written request to the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance within 30 days of the date of publication of this notice. Requests should contain: (1) The party's name, address and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of issues parties intend to discuss. Issues raised in the hearing will be limited to those raised in the respective case and rebuttal briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, the Department intends to hold the hearing at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, at a date and time to be determined. See 19 CFR 351.310(d). Parties should confirm by telephone the date, time, and location of the hearing two days before the scheduled date. The Department intends to issue the final results of this administrative review, which will include the results of our analysis of all issues raised in the case briefs, within 120 days of publication of these preliminary results in the Federal Register, pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act. Assessment Rates Upon issuance of the final results, the Department will determine, and CBP [[Page 7753]] shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review.\10\ The Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the publication date of the final results of this review. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \10\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For any individually examined respondent whose weighted average dumping margin is above de minimis (i.e., 0.50 percent) in the final results of this review, the Department will calculate importer-specific assessment rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the importer's examined sales to the total entered value of sales, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem rate is greater than de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to collect the appropriate duties at the time of liquidation.\11\ Where either a respondent's weighted average dumping margin is zero or de minimis, or an importer- (or customer-) specific ad valorem is zero or de minimis, the Department will instruct CBP to liquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.\12\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \11\ See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). \12\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the final results of this review for shipments of the subject merchandise from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided by sections 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the companies listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that established in the final results of this review (except, if the rate is zero or de minimis, then zero cash deposit will be required); (2) for previously investigated or reviewed PRC and non-PRC exporters not listed above that received a separate rate in a prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all PRC exporters of subject merchandise that have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will be that for the PRC-wide entity; and (4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject merchandise which have not received their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. These deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Department's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. These preliminary results are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: February 8, 2016. Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 1. Summary 2. Case History 3. Scope of the Order 4. Discussion of the Methodology a. Non-Market Economy Country Status b. Separate Rates c. Surrogate Country d. PRC-Wide Entity e. Determination of Comparison Method f. Results of Differential Pricing Analysis g. Comparisons to Normal Value h. Date of Sale i. Export Price j. Value Added Tax k. Normal Value l. Factor Valuations m. Currency Conversion 5. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2016-03073 Filed 2-12-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2016 / Notices 7751
Final Results of Review Cash Deposit Requirements The Department is issuing and
The following deposit requirements publishing these final results of
As a result of our review, we administrative review in accordance
determine the following weighted- will be effective for all shipments of
PET Film from India entered, or with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of
average dumping margins exist for the the Act.
period July 1, 2013, through June 30, withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the date of Dated: February 8, 2016.
2014.
publication of the final results of this Paul Piquado,
Weighted-
administrative review, as provided for Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
average by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) Compliance.
Producer or exporter dumping The cash deposit rate for the company Appendix
margin under review will be equal to the
(percent) weighted-average dumping margin I. Summary
established in the final results of this II. Background
Jindal Poly Films Limited 6 ... 0.59 Scope of the Order
SRF Limited .......................... 0.00
review (except, if the rate is de minimis, III. Discussion of the Issues
Ester Industries Limited ........ 0.59 i.e., less than 0.5 percent, then the cash Comment 1: Whether To Exclude Certain
Garware Polyester Ltd .......... 0.59 deposit rate will be zero); (2) for Sales From the Margin Calculation
Polyplex Corporation Limited 0.59 previously reviewed or investigated Comment 2: Whether To Grant a Quantity
companies not listed above, the cash Discount Adjustment to Jindal
Vacmet .................................. 0.59
deposit rate will continue to be the Comment 3: G&A Expense and Interest
company-specific rate published in the Expense Ratio
Assessment Rates Comment 4: Differential Pricing
completed segment for the most recent
period for that company; (3) if the [FR Doc. 2016–03083 Filed 2–12–16; 8:45 am]
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), the exporter is not a firm covered in this BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Department determined, and U.S. review, a prior review, or the less-than-
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) fair-value investigation, but the
manufacturer is, the cash deposit rate DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries of subject will be the rate established in the International Trade Administration
merchandise, in accordance with the completed segment for the most recent
period for the manufacturer of the [A–570–001]
final results of this review. The
Department will issue assessment merchandise; and (4) if neither the
exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm Potassium Permanganate From the
instructions to CBP 15 days after the People’s Republic of China:
covered in this or any other completed
date of publication of the final results of Preliminary Results of the 2014
segment of this proceeding, then the
review. We will instruct CBP to Antidumping Duty Administrative
cash deposit rate will be the all others
liquidate entries of merchandise Review
rate for this proceeding, 5.71 percent.
produced and/or exported by the
These deposit requirements, when AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
aforementioned companies. The
imposed, shall remain in effect until International Trade Administration,
Department will calculate importer- further notice. Department of Commerce.
specific assessment rates for Jindal. SUMMARY: In response to a request by
Where the respondent reported the Notification to Importers
Pacific Accelerator Limited (‘‘PAL’’), the
entered value for its sales, the This notice serves as a final reminder Department of Commerce (the
Department calculates importer-specific to importers of their responsibility ‘‘Department’’) is conducting an
ad valorem assessment rates based on under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a administrative review of the
the ratio of the total amount of dumping certificate regarding the reimbursement antidumping duty (‘‘AD’’) order on
calculated for the examined sales to the of antidumping duties prior to potassium permanganate from the
total entered value of those same sales.7 liquidation of the relevant entries People’s Republic of China (the ‘‘PRC’’)
However, where the respondent did not during this review period. Failure to for the period of review (‘‘POR’’)
report the entered value for its sales, the comply with this requirement could January 1, 2014, through December 31,
Department calculates importer-specific result in the Secretary’s presumption 2014.1 The Department preliminarily
per-unit duty assessment rates. We will that reimbursement of antidumping determines that PAL sold subject
instruct CBP to apply an ad valorem duties occurred and the subsequent merchandise in the United States at
assessment rate as indicated above to all assessment of doubled antidumping prices below normal value (‘‘NV’’)
entries of subject merchandise during duties. during the POR. If these preliminary
the POR which were produced and/or results are adopted in the final results,
Notifications to Interested Parties
exported by the four non-selected the Department will instruct U.S.
companies Ester Industries Limited, This notice also serves as a reminder Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’)
Garware Polyester Ltd, Polyplex to parties subject to administrative to assess antidumping duties on all
Corporation Limited, and Vacmet. protective order (APO) of their appropriate entries of subject
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we responsibility concerning the merchandise during the POR. Interested
will instruct CBP to liquidate without destruction of proprietary information parties are invited to comment on these
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
regard to antidumping duties any disclosed under APO in accordance preliminary results.
entries produced and/or exported by with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely DATES: Effective February 16, 2016.
SRF during the POR.8 written notification of the return or
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
destruction of APO materials or
Walker or Javier Barrientos, AD/CVD
6 The Initiation Notice lists the company as Jindal conversion to judicial protective order is
Poly Films Limited of India. hereby requested. Failure to comply 1 See Antidumping Duty Order: Potassium
7 See 19 CFR 351.212(b). with the regulations and terms of an Permanganate from the People’s Republic of China,
8 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1). APO is a sanctionable violation. 49 FR 3897 (January 31, 1984).
VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:15 Feb 12, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM 16FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_7781/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 16, 2016 / Notices 7753
shall assess, antidumping duties on all Notification to Importers period of review (POR) is January 1,
appropriate entries covered by this This notice also serves as a 2013, through December 31, 2013.2
review.10 The Department intends to preliminary reminder to importers of Based on an analysis of the comments
issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 their responsibility under 19 CFR received, the Department has made
days after the publication date of the 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate changes to the subsidy rate determined
final results of this review. regarding the reimbursement of for Jindal Poly Films Limited (Jindal).
For any individually examined antidumping duties prior to liquidation The final subsidy rates are listed in the
respondent whose weighted average of the relevant entries during the POR. ‘‘Final Results of Administrative
dumping margin is above de minimis Failure to comply with this requirement Review’’ section below.
(i.e., 0.50 percent) in the final results of could result in the Department’s DATES: Effective date: February 16, 2016.
this review, the Department will presumption that reimbursement of FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elfi
calculate importer-specific assessment antidumping duties occurred and the Blum, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII,
rates on the basis of the ratio of the total subsequent assessment of double Enforcement and Compliance, U.S.
amount of dumping calculated for the antidumping duties. Department of Commerce, 14th Street
importer’s examined sales to the total These preliminary results are issued and Constitution Avenue NW.,
entered value of sales, in accordance and published in accordance with Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202)
with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 482–0197.
importer- (or customer-) specific ad Act. Scope of the Order
valorem rate is greater than de minimis, Dated: February 8, 2016.
the Department will instruct CBP to For the purposes of the order, the
Paul Piquado, products covered are all gauges of raw,
collect the appropriate duties at the time
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and pretreated, or primed polyethylene
of liquidation.11 Where either a Compliance.
respondent’s weighted average dumping terephthalate film, sheet and strip,
margin is zero or de minimis, or an Appendix whether extruded or coextruded.
importer- (or customer-) specific ad Excluded are metallized films and other
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary finished films that have had at least one
valorem is zero or de minimis, the Decision Memorandum
Department will instruct CBP to of their surfaces modified by the
1. Summary application of a performance-enhancing
liquidate appropriate entries without 2. Case History
regard to antidumping duties.12 resinous or inorganic layer of more than
3. Scope of the Order
4. Discussion of the Methodology
0.00001 inches thick. Imports of PET
Cash Deposit Requirements a. Non-Market Economy Country Status film are classifiable in the Harmonized
b. Separate Rates Tariff Schedule of the United States
The following cash deposit
c. Surrogate Country (HTSUS) under item number
requirements will be effective upon
d. PRC-Wide Entity 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are
publication of the final results of this e. Determination of Comparison Method provided for convenience and customs
review for shipments of the subject f. Results of Differential Pricing Analysis purposes. The written description of the
merchandise from the PRC entered, or g. Comparisons to Normal Value scope of the order is dispositive.
withdrawn from warehouse, for h. Date of Sale
consumption on or after the publication i. Export Price Analysis of Comments Received
date, as provided by sections j. Value Added Tax
k. Normal Value
The issues raised by Petitioners 3 and
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For the Jindal in their case briefs, and
companies listed above that have a l. Factor Valuations
m. Currency Conversion Petitioners’ rebuttal brief, are addressed
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 5. Recommendation in the Issues and Decision
be that established in the final results of Memorandum.4 The issues are
[FR Doc. 2016–03073 Filed 2–12–16; 8:45 am]
this review (except, if the rate is zero or
de minimis, then zero cash deposit will BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative
be required); (2) for previously Review; 2013, 80 FR 46956 (August 6, 2015)
investigated or reviewed PRC and non- (Preliminary Results 2013).
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 2 As explained in the memorandum from the
PRC exporters not listed above that
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement &
received a separate rate in a prior International Trade Administration Compliance, the Department has exercised its
segment of this proceeding, the cash discretion to toll all administrative deadlines due
deposit rate will continue to be the [C–533–825] to the recent closure of the Federal Government. All
existing exporter-specific rate; (3) for all deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have
PRC exporters of subject merchandise Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, been extended by four business days. The revised
Sheet, and Strip From India: Final deadline for the final results of this review is now
that have not been found to be entitled February 8, 2016. See Memorandum to the Record
to a separate rate, the cash deposit rate Results of Countervailing Duty from Ron Lorentzen, Acting A/S for Enforcement &
will be that for the PRC-wide entity; and Administrative Review; 2013 Compliance, regarding ‘‘Tolling of Adminstrative
Deadlines as a Result of the Government Closure
(4) for all non-PRC exporters of subject AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, During Snowstorm Jonas,’’ dated January 27, 2016.
merchandise which have not received International Trade Administration, 3 DuPont Teijin Films, Inc., Mitsubishi Polyester
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will Department of Commerce. Film, Inc. and SKC, Inc. (collectively,
be the rate applicable to the PRC ‘‘Petitioners’’).
SUMMARY: On August 6, 2015, the 4 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy
mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
exporter that supplied that non-PRC Department published the preliminary Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and
exporter. These deposit requirements, results of the administrative review of Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado,
when imposed, shall remain in effect the countervailing duty order on Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
until further notice. polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, Compliance, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for
the Final Results of Countervailing Duty
and strip (PET film) from India.1 The Administrative Review: Polyethylene Terephthalate
10 See 19 CFR 351.212(b). Film, Sheet, and Strip from India; 2013,’’ dated
11 See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 1 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet and concurrently with this notice and herein
12 See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). Strip From India: Preliminary Results And Partial Continued
VerDate Sep<11>2014 22:15 Feb 12, 2016 Jkt 238001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\16FEN1.SGM 16FEN1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_7781/page/3.svg)
Document Created: 2016-02-13 03:13:14
Document Modified: 2016-02-13 03:13:14
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Notices | |
| Dates | Effective February 16, 2016. | |
| Contact | Paul Walker or Javier Barrientos, AD/ CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone 202-482-0413 or 202-482-2243, respectively. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 7751 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR