81 FR 78042 - Trademark Fee Adjustment; Correction
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Patent and Trademark Office Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 215 (November 7, 2016)
Patent and Trademark Office
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 215 (November 7, 2016)
| Page Range | 78042-78043 | |
| FR Document | 2016-26684 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 215 (Monday, November 7, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 78042-78043] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-26684] [[Page 78042]] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Patent and Trademark Office 37 CFR Parts 2 and 7 [Docket No. PTO-T-2016-0005] RIN 0651-AD08 Trademark Fee Adjustment; Correction AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce. ACTION: Final rule; correction. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This document contains corrections to tables included in the preamble of the final rule implementing changes to trademark fees published in the Federal Register of Friday, October 21, 2016. DATES: This rule is effective on January 14, 2017. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Catherine Cain, Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Trademark Examination Policy, by email at [email protected], or by telephone at (571) 272-8946. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Need for Correction: As published, the regulatory and explanatory text in the final rule implementing changes to trademark fees (81 FR 72694; October 21, 2016) are correct. However, certain tables included in the preamble contain minor errors. In the tables entitled ``Fees for Paper Filings'' and ``New Fees for Extensions of Time at the TTAB,'' the descriptions for certain fees listed were mistakenly transposed. In the table entitled ``Other Trademark-Processing Fees [Extension of time to file a statement of use],'' a CFR citation contained a typographical error. Good cause exists to issue this rule without prior notice and opportunity for comment as the corrections are non-substantive and are being implemented to avoid inconsistencies and any confusion that may occur when comparing the items in the tables with the regulatory text. The USPTO corrects the errors as discussed below. In FR Doc. 2016-25506, appearing on page 72694 in the Federal Register of Friday, October 21, 2016, make the following corrections: 1. On page 72697, in the table entitled ``Fees for Paper Filings,'' revise the following: a. In the entry for 2.6(a)(22)(i), the Description is corrected to read ``Filing a Request for an Extension of Time to File a Notice of Opposition under Sec. 2.102(c)(1)(ii) or (c)(2) on Paper,'' and b. In the entry for 2.6(a)(23)(i), the Description is corrected to read ``Filing a Request for an Extension of Time to File a Notice of Opposition under Sec. 2.102(c)(3) on Paper.'' 2. On page 72700, the table entitled ``Other Trademark-Processing Fees [Extension of time to file a statement of use]'' is corrected to read as follows: Other Trademark-Processing Fees [Extension of time to file a statement of use] ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 37 CFR Fee code Description Current fee Final rule fee Change ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.6(a)(4)(i)................. 6004 Filing a Request $150 $225 $75 under Sec. 1(d)(2) of the Act for a Six- Month Extension of Time for Filing a Statement of Use under Sec. 1(d)(1) of the Act on Paper, per Class. 2.6(a)(4)(ii)................ 7004 Filing a Request 150 125 (25) under Sec. 1(d)(2) of the Act for a Six- Month Extension of Time for Filing a Statement of Use under Sec. 1(d)(1) of the Act through TEAS, per Class. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3. On page 72701, the table entitled ``New Fees for Extensions of Time at the TTAB'' is corrected to read as follows: New Fees for Extensions of Time at the TTAB ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 37 CFR Fee code Description Current fee Final rule fee Change ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2.6(a)(22)(i).............. New............... Filing a .............. $200 n/a Request for an Extension of Time to File a Notice of Opposition under Sec. 2.102(c)(1)(ii ) or (c)(2) on Paper. 2.6(a)(22)(ii)............. New............... Filing a n/a 100 n/a Request for an Extension of Time to File a Notice of Opposition under Sec. 2.102(c)(1)(ii ) or (c)(2) through ESTTA. 2.6(a)(23)(i).............. New............... Filing a n/a 300 n/a Request for an Extension of Time to File a Notice of Opposition under Sec. 2.102(c)(3) on Paper. 2.6(a)(23)(ii)............. New............... Filing a n/a 200 n/a Request for an Extension of Time to File a Notice of Opposition under Sec. 2.102(c)(3) through ESTTA. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 78043]] Dated: October 28, 2016. Michelle K. Lee, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [FR Doc. 2016-26684 Filed 11-4-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510-16-P
![78042 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 215 / Monday, November 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Examination Policy, by email at comparing the items in the tables with
TMPolicy@uspto.gov, or by telephone at the regulatory text. The USPTO corrects
Patent and Trademark Office (571) 272–8946. the errors as discussed below.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2016–25506, appearing on
37 CFR Parts 2 and 7 Need for Correction: As published, page 72694 in the Federal Register of
[Docket No. PTO–T–2016–0005] the regulatory and explanatory text in Friday, October 21, 2016, make the
the final rule implementing changes to following corrections:
RIN 0651–AD08 trademark fees (81 FR 72694; October 1. On page 72697, in the table entitled
21, 2016) are correct. However, certain ‘‘Fees for Paper Filings,’’ revise the
Trademark Fee Adjustment; Correction
tables included in the preamble contain following:
AGENCY: United States Patent and minor errors. In the tables entitled ‘‘Fees
Trademark Office, Commerce. for Paper Filings’’ and ‘‘New Fees for a. In the entry for 2.6(a)(22)(i), the
Extensions of Time at the TTAB,’’ the Description is corrected to read ‘‘Filing
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
descriptions for certain fees listed were a Request for an Extension of Time to
SUMMARY: This document contains mistakenly transposed. In the table File a Notice of Opposition under
corrections to tables included in the entitled ‘‘Other Trademark-Processing § 2.102(c)(1)(ii) or (c)(2) on Paper,’’ and
preamble of the final rule implementing Fees [Extension of time to file a b. In the entry for 2.6(a)(23)(i), the
changes to trademark fees published in statement of use],’’ a CFR citation Description is corrected to read ‘‘Filing
the Federal Register of Friday, October contained a typographical error. Good a Request for an Extension of Time to
21, 2016. cause exists to issue this rule without File a Notice of Opposition under
DATES: This rule is effective on January prior notice and opportunity for § 2.102(c)(3) on Paper.’’
14, 2017. comment as the corrections are non- 2. On page 72700, the table entitled
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: substantive and are being implemented ‘‘Other Trademark-Processing Fees
Catherine Cain, Office of the Deputy to avoid inconsistencies and any [Extension of time to file a statement of
Commissioner for Trademark confusion that may occur when use]’’ is corrected to read as follows:
OTHER TRADEMARK-PROCESSING FEES
[Extension of time to file a statement of use]
37 CFR Fee code Description Current fee Final rule fee Change
2.6(a)(4)(i) .................. 6004 Filing a Request under § 1(d)(2) of the Act for a $150 $225 $75
Six-Month Extension of Time for Filing a State-
ment of Use under § 1(d)(1) of the Act on Paper,
per Class.
2.6(a)(4)(ii) ................. 7004 Filing a Request under § 1(d)(2) of the Act for a 150 125 (25)
Six-Month Extension of Time for Filing a State-
ment of Use under § 1(d)(1) of the Act through
TEAS, per Class.
3. On page 72701, the table entitled
‘‘New Fees for Extensions of Time at the
TTAB’’ is corrected to read as follows:
NEW FEES FOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME AT THE TTAB
37 CFR Fee code Description Current fee Final rule fee Change
2.6(a)(22)(i) ................ New ................ Filing a Request for an Extension of Time to File a ........................ $200 n/a
Notice of Opposition under § 2.102(c)(1)(ii) or
(c)(2) on Paper.
2.6(a)(22)(ii) ............... New ................ Filing a Request for an Extension of Time to File a n/a 100 n/a
Notice of Opposition under § 2.102(c)(1)(ii) or
(c)(2) through ESTTA.
2.6(a)(23)(i) ................ New ................ Filing a Request for an Extension of Time to File a n/a 300 n/a
Notice of Opposition under § 2.102(c)(3) on
Paper.
2.6(a)(23)(ii) ............... New ................ Filing a Request for an Extension of Time to File a n/a 200 n/a
Notice of Opposition under § 2.102(c)(3) through
ESTTA.
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
VerDate Sep<11>2014 11:32 Nov 04, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_78257/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 215 / Monday, November 7, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 78043
Dated: October 28, 2016. 27711, by phone at (919) 54l-3407, or by B. What are the final revisions to the 40
Michelle K. Lee, email at montanez.jessica@epa.gov. CFR part 49 Indian country
nonattainment NSR provisions?
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: C. What is the basis for the EPA’s final
Property and Director of the United States
Regulated entities. The Administrator revisions?
Patent and Trademark Office.
determined that this action is subject to IV. Environmental Justice Considerations
[FR Doc. 2016–26684 Filed 11–4–16; 8:45 am] V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
the provisions of Clean Air Act (CAA or
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Act) section 307(d). CAA section Planning and Review and Executive
307(d)(1)(V) (the provisions of CAA Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
section 307(d) apply to ‘‘such other Regulatory Review
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION actions as the Administrator may B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
AGENCY determine’’). These are amendments to C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
existing regulations and could affect any D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
40 CFR Parts 49 and 52 (UMRA)
facility that is eligible for a PSD permit
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2015–0782; FRL–9954–88– rescission for any such permit issued by E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
OAR] the EPA, reviewing authorities that
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
implement the EPA’s regulations Governments
RIN 2060–AS56
through delegation or reviewing G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Rescission of Preconstruction Permits authorities that incorporate the federal Children From Environmental Health
Issued Under the Clean Air Act PSD regulations by reference. Risks and Safety Risks
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions
I. General Information
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Concerning Regulations That
Agency (EPA). A. Does this action apply to me? Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
ACTION: Final rule.
Entities potentially affected by this I. National Technology Transfer and
final rulemaking include reviewing Advancement Act (NTTAA)
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
authorities responsible for the J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
Agency (EPA) is promulgating To Address Environmental Justice in
amendments to the EPA’s federal permitting of stationary sources of air
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Prevention of Significant Deterioration pollution, including the following: The Populations
(PSD) regulations to remove a date EPA Regional offices; air agencies that K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
restriction from the Permit Rescission have delegated authority to implement L. Judicial Review
provision. Other than removing the date the EPA regulations; and air agencies VI. Statutory Authority
restriction, this final rule does not alter that administer EPA-approved air
the criteria under which a new source programs that incorporate the federal II. Background for Final Rulemaking
review (NSR) permit may be rescinded. NSR rules by reference. Entities also
potentially affected by this final On June 14, 2016, the EPA proposed
This final rule also clarifies that a revisions to the Permit Rescission
rescission of a permit is not automatic rulemaking include owners and
operators of stationary sources subject to provision in the EPA’s federal PSD
and corrects an outdated cross-reference regulations at 40 CFR 52.21(w). The
to another part of the PSD regulations. NSR permitting programs under the
CAA that are administered by the proposed revisions remove a date
The EPA is also adding a corresponding restriction from this provision, clarify
Permit Rescission provision in the entities described previously.
that a rescission of a permit is
federal regulations that apply to major B. Where can I get a copy of this contingent on the reviewing authority’s
sources in nonattainment areas of document and other related concurrence with a rescission
Indian country. information? applicant’s demonstration that the PSD
DATES: This final rule is effective on permit provisions ‘‘would not apply to
December 7, 2016. In addition to being available in the the source or modification,’’ and correct
docket, an electronic copy of this notice an outdated cross-reference to another
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
will be posted at: https://www.epa.gov/ part of the PSD regulations. The EPA
docket for this action under Docket ID
nsr/nsr-regulatory-actions. Upon also proposed to add a corresponding
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2015–0782. All
publication in the Federal Register, Permit Rescission provision in the
documents in the docket are listed on
only the published version may be federal regulations that apply to major
the http://www.regulations.gov Web
considered the final official version of sources in nonattainment areas of
site. Although listed in the index, some
the notice, and will govern in the case Indian country.
information is not publicly available,
of any discrepancies between the
i.e., confidential business information or The preamble to the proposal
Federal Register published version and
other information whose disclosure is provided an overview of the NSR
any other version.
restricted by statute. Certain other permitting program and a brief history
material, such as copyrighted material, C. How is this document organized? of the previous revisions to the Permit
will be publicly available only in hard Rescission provision regulations. The
copy. Publicly available docket The information presented in this preamble also explained the EPA’s basis
materials are available electronically in document is organized as follows: for the proposed changes and rationale.
http://www.regulations.gov. I. General Information Because the EPA is finalizing this rule
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For A. Does this action apply to me? as it was proposed, this final rulemaking
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES
further general information on this B. Where can I get a copy of this document notice does not repeat that discussion.
and other related information?
rulemaking, contact Ms. Jessica C. How is this document organized?
The 30-day public comment period
Montanez, Office of Air Quality II. Background for Final Rulemaking for the proposed rule closed on July 14,
Planning and Standards, U.S. III. Overview of the Final Revisions 2016. In Section III of this document, we
Environmental Protection Agency A. What are the final revisions to the 40 summarize and respond to the
(C504–03), Research Triangle Park, NC CFR part 52 Permit Rescission provision? comments received and explain the
VerDate Sep<11>2014 11:32 Nov 04, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_78257/page/2.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-14 08:21:33
Document Modified: 2018-02-14 08:21:33
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule; correction. | |
| Dates | This rule is effective on January 14, 2017. | |
| Contact | Catherine Cain, Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Trademark Examination Policy, by email at [email protected], or by telephone at (571) 272-8946. | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 78042 | |
| RIN Number | 0651-AD08 | |
| CFR Citation | 37
CFR
2 37 CFR 7 |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR