81 FR 78097 - Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Puerto Rico; Attainment Demonstration for the Arecibo Lead Nonattainment Area
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 215 (November 7, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 215 (November 7, 2016)
| Page Range | 78097-78103 | |
| FR Document | 2016-26729 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 215 (Monday, November 7, 2016)] [Proposed Rules] [Pages 78097-78103] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-26729] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA-R02-OAR-2016-0559; FRL-9954-97-Region 2] Approval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Puerto Rico; Attainment Demonstration for the Arecibo Lead Nonattainment Area AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency. ACTION: Proposed rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan dated August 30, 2016, submitted by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to the EPA, for the purpose of providing for attainment of the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards in the Arecibo Lead nonattainment area. The Arecibo nonattainment Area is comprised of a portion of Arecibo Municipality in Puerto Rico with a 4 kilometer radius surrounding The Battery Recycling Company, Inc. Puerto Rico initially submitted a lead SIP revision for the Arecibo area on January 30, 2015. The EPA proposed to disapprove the January 30, 2015 submittal on February 29, 2016. The PREQB rescinded the January 30, 2015 submittal and replaced it with the August 30, 2016 lead SIP submittal for the Arecibo area. DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 7, 2016. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA- R02-OAR-2016-0559 at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not [[Page 78098]] consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mazeeda Khan, Air Programs Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007-1866, (212) 637-3715, or by email at [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. What action is the EPA proposing? II. What is the background information for this proposal? III. What is included in Puerto Rico's SIP submittal? IV. What is the EPA's analysis of Puerto Rico's attainment plan submittal? a. Pollutants Addressed b. Emissions Inventory Requirements i. 2011 Emissions Inventory ii. 2016 Emissions Inventory c. Attainment Plan Modeling i. Modeling Approach ii. Modeling Results d. RACM/RACT Requirements e. RFP Requirements f. Contingency Measures g. Attainment Date V. What are the EPA's conclusions? VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What action is the EPA proposing? The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve Puerto Rico's State Implementation Plan (SIP) dated August 30, 2016, as submitted by the Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board (PREQB) to the EPA, for the purpose of demonstrating attainment of the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) in the Arecibo Lead nonattainment area (Arecibo Area or Area). The Arecibo Area is comprised of a portion of Arecibo Municipality in Puerto Rico with a 4 kilometer radius surrounding The Battery Recycling Company, Inc. (TBRCI). Puerto Rico's lead attainment plan for the Arecibo Area includes a base year emissions inventory, a modeling demonstration of lead attainment, contingency measures and narrative on control measures that included reasonably available control measures (RACM)/reasonably available control technology (RACT), and reasonable further progress (RFP). The EPA proposes to determine that Puerto Rico's attainment plan for the 2008 Lead NAAQS for the Arecibo Area meets the applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). The EPA is proposing to approve Puerto Rico's attainment plan for the Arecibo Area. The EPA's analysis for this proposed action is discussed in Section IV of this proposed rulemaking. II. What is the background information for this proposal? On November 12, 2008 (73 FR 66964), the EPA revised the Lead NAAQS, lowering the level from 1.5 micrograms per cubic meter ([mu]g/m\3\) to 0.15 [mu]g/m\3\ calculated over a three-month rolling average. The EPA established the 2008 Lead NAAQS based on significant evidence and numerous health studies demonstrating that serious health effects are associated with exposures to lead emissions. Following promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, the EPA is required by the CAA to designate areas throughout the United States as attaining or not attaining the NAAQS; this designation process is described in section 107(d)(1) of the CAA. On November 22, 2010 (75 FR 71033), the EPA promulgated initial air quality designations for the 2008 Lead NAAQS, which became effective on December 31, 2010, based on air quality monitoring data for calendar years 2007-2009, where there was sufficient data to support a nonattainment designation. On November 22, 2011 (76 FR 72097), designations for the 2008 Lead NAAQS for all remaining areas were completed, which became effective on December 31, 2011, based on air quality monitoring data for calendar years 2008- 2010. Effective December 31, 2011, the Arecibo Area was designated as nonattainment for the 2008 Lead NAAQS, based on air quality monitoring data from April 2010 to June 2010 using a three-month rolling average design value. This designation triggered a requirement for Puerto Rico to submit a SIP revision by June 30, 2013, with a plan for how the Area would attain the 2008 Lead NAAQS, as expeditiously as practicable, but no later than December 31, 2016. The PREQB initially submitted a lead SIP revision for the Arecibo area on January 30, 2015. The EPA proposed to disapprove the January 30, 2015 submittal on February 29, 2016 (81 FR 10159). One comment was received from the Chairman of the PREQB, Weldin Ortiz Franco. The PREQB rescinded the January 30, 2015 submittal and replaced it with the August 30, 2016 lead SIP submittal for the Arecibo area. Accordingly, the EPA is proposing to act on the August 30, 2016 submittal. Today's proposal represents EPA's only action on Puerto Rico lead SIP. The revised SIP submittal included the base year emissions inventory and the attainment demonstration. The EPA's analysis of the submitted attainment plan includes a review of the pollutant addressed, emissions inventory requirements, modeling demonstration of lead attainment, contingency measures and narrative on control measures that included reasonably available control measures (RACM)/reasonably available control technology (RACT), and reasonable further progress (RFP) for the Arecibo Area. III. What is included in Puerto Rico's proposed SIP submittal? In accordance with CAA section 172(c) and 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 51.117, Puerto Rico's attainment plan for the Arecibo Area includes: (1) An emissions inventory for the plan's base year (2011); and (2) an attainment demonstration. The attainment demonstration includes: Technical analyses that locate, identify and quantify sources of emissions contributing to violations of the 2008 Lead NAAQS; a modeling analysis of an emissions control strategy for the TBRCI facility that attains the level of the Lead NAAQS by the attainment year (2016); and, contingency measures required under CAA section 172(c)(9). IV. What is the EPA's analysis of Puerto Rico's Attainment Plan submittal? CAA section 172(c)(4) and the Lead SIP regulations found at 40 CFR 51.117 require States to employ atmospheric dispersion modeling for the demonstration of attainment of the Lead NAAQS for areas in the vicinity of point sources listed in 40 CFR 51.117(a)(1), as expeditiously as practicable. Section 302(d) of the CAA includes the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico in the definition of the term ``State.'' The demonstration must also meet the requirements of 40 CFR 51.112 and 40 CFR part 51, appendix W, and include inventory data, modeling results, and emissions reduction analyses on which the State has based its projected attainment. All these requirements comprise the ``attainment plan'' that is required for lead nonattainment areas. In the case of the Arecibo Area, the EPA is proposing to approve the August 30, 2016 attainment plan submitted by Puerto Rico. The EPA's analysis is provided below. a. Pollutants Addressed Puerto Rico's lead attainment plan evaluates lead emissions in the Arecibo Area within the portion of Arecibo [[Page 78099]] Municipality designated nonattainment for the 2008 Lead NAAQS. There are no precursors to consider for the lead attainment plan. b. Emissions Inventory Requirements i. 2011 Base Year Inventory States are required under section 172(c)(3) of the CAA to develop comprehensive, accurate and current inventories of actual emissions from all sources of the relevant pollutant or pollutants in the area. These inventories provide a detailed accounting of all emissions and emission sources by precursor or pollutant. In the November 12, 2008, Lead Standard rulemaking, the EPA finalized the emissions inventory requirements. The current regulations are located at 40 CFR 51.117(e), and include, but are not limited to, the following emissions inventory requirements:The SIP inventory must be approved by the EPA as a SIP element and is subject to public hearing requirements; and, The point source inventory upon which the summary of the baseline for lead emissions inventory is based must contain all sources that emit 0.5 or more tons of lead per year (tons/yr). For the base year inventory of actual emissions, the EPA generally recommends using either the year 2010 or 2011 as the base year for the contingency measure calculations, but does provide flexibility for using other inventory years if states can show another year is more appropriate.\1\ For Lead SIPs, CAA section 172(c)(3) requires that all sources of lead emissions in the nonattainment area be submitted with the base-year inventory. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \1\ See the EPA document titled ``Addendum to the 2008 Lead NAAQS Implementation Questions and Answers'' dated August 10, 2012 located at https://www.epa.gov/lead-air-pollution/lead-state-implementation-plan-sip-checklist-guide and https://www.epa.gov/lead-air-pollution/lead-pb-national-ambient-air-quality-standards-naaqs-implementation-guidance. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Puerto Rico selected calendar year 2011 as the base year. This inventory included Arecibo, Barceloneta, Ciales, Florida, Hatillo and Utuado municipalities. Several facilities located in these municipalities that may be a source of lead emissions were considered in the inventory. These facilities are: TBRCI, PREPA Cambalache, Safetech Corporation, Antonio Nery Juarbe (ANJ) Airport, Eaton, Abbvie Ltd., Pfizer Pharmaceuticals LLC, and Merck Sharp & Dohme. TBRCI was a secondary lead smelter facility, dedicated to recycling lead-acid batteries and had potential lead emissions over 0.5 tons/yr. PREPA Cambalache is an electric power facility. Safetech Corporation is a nearby source dedicated to the collection, temporary storage and disposal by incineration of commercial and industrial non-hazardous solid waste. The ANJ Airport is a general aviation airport located near TBRCI. Eaton is dedicated to power and transformer manufacturing and Abbvie Ltd. (formerly Abbott Laboratories), Merck Sharp and Dohme and Pfizer are pharmaceuticals processes. Energy Answers and Sunbeam Synergy, two new facilities that are permitted but are not under construction yet, were also included in the 2016 emissions inventory. For the 2011 emissions inventory, actual emissions were used for facilities with actual reported emissions and/or activity data. For facilities with no reported 2011 emissions data, the facility maximum capacity or permit limits were used to calculate 2011 emissions in order to include all possible emissions as part of the attainment demonstration analysis. The ANJ Airport lead emissions are from the EPA Emissions Inventory System/National Emissions Inventory (EIS/NEI) System. According to this inventory, the only source of lead emissions of 0.5 of tons/yr, or more, in 2011 is TBRCI which emitted 1.21 tons of lead per year. All other facilities were well below the 0.5 tons/yr limit as identified in Table 1. TBRCI was dedicated to the recycling of lead batteries for the production of lead of different specifications. It produced point source emissions from one furnace and five kettle burners and fugitive emissions from material transport and handling. The 2011 preliminary air quality modeling studies, emissions inventory and ambient air monitoring data indicate that TBRCI fugitive emissions are the major contributor to the high lead concentration in Arecibo and, therefore, are the focus of the Arecibo attainment plan, as discussed in Section IV. In order to comply with the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Secondary Lead Smelting (40 CFR part 63, subpart X) also known as the Maximum Available Control Technology (MACT) standard, TBRCI was required to implement control measures to lower the potential fugitive lead emissions in the main process building and in the handling operations. The PREQB Governing Board determined TBRCI was unable to comply with this regulation,\2\ and, accordingly, the PREQB withdrew both the construction and operating permits for the facility. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \2\ Puerto Rico SIP revision, Appendix G: Translation of Resolution R-15-6. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The design value used for designating the area as nonattainment was based on monitoring data from 2010. For the purposes of calculating the nonattainment area emissions inventory, lead emissions data were taken from the PREQB's 2011 Emissions Inventory for the area. The EPA has determined that the 2011 base year emissions inventory estimates submitted are in compliance with CAA section 172(c)(3), are conservative and were developed in accordance with the EPA guidance. Details of the inventory are provided in the August 30, 2016 submittal. Table 1 identifies the base year emissions inventory for 2011. ii. 2016 Attainment/Projection Inventory While the PREQB has two source oriented monitors in Arecibo, there is no monitor in the area to provide background concentration. To address the lead background concentrations in the attainment modeling study, the EPA recommends a multi-source American Meteorological Society/Environmental Protection Agency Regulatory Model (AERMOD) be run using the background lead emissions from nearby facilities, projected to 2016. The municipalities analyzed for background lead emissions were Barceloneta, Ciales, Florida, Hatillo, and Utuado. Of these municipalities, Barceloneta is the only municipality in addition to Arecibo, which has reported lead emissions. In accordance with the Lead Guidance \3\ for the Attainment/ Projection Inventory, the maximum allowable emissions should be included for the attainment year inventory, which includes only those sources within the modeling domain. The EPA modeling guidance, 40 CFR part 51 Appendix W provides advice on which sources need to be included explicitly (i.e., as point sources) in the modeling and provides for including the impacts of smaller and diffuse sources through the use of background concentrations and other less specific techniques given the relatively lower significance of such sources to the SIP demonstration. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \3\ Lead Guideline Document, USEPA, EPA-452/R-93-009, April 1993, https://www.epa.gov/lead-air-pollution/lead-pb-national-ambient-air-quality-standards-naaqs-implementation-guidance. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Puerto Rico, allowable lead emissions projected to 2016 with controls or permit limits were used in the attainment modeling study. For existing facilities, allowable emissions with controls or permit limits were used to develop the inventory. Energy [[Page 78100]] Answers and Sunbeam Synergy are permitted sources that are not under construction yet.\4\ These sources did not exist in 2011 but were scheduled to start operation in 2016. Their potential allowable lead emissions with controls or permit limits were used for the 2016 projection inventory. The ANJ Airport lead emissions are from the EPA EIS/NEI System and were projected to 2016 using the methodology recommended by the EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality (OTAQ). Details of the inventory are provided in the SIP submittal. The inventory was developed in accordance with CAA Section 172(c)(3) and the EPA Lead Guidance. Table 1 identifies the 2016 attainment/ projection year emissions inventory for 2016. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \4\ Puerto Rico SIP, Appendix B: 2016 Emissions Projection Year Inventory, Arecibo Lead SIP. Table 1--Arecibo Lead SIP, Emission Sources in the Baseline Emissions Inventory 2011 and 2016 Attainment/ Projection Year Emissions Inventory ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2016 Lead attainment/ 2011 Lead emissions (In projection year Industry Municipality tons/year) emissions inventory (In tons/year) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PREPA Cambalache..................... Arecibo................ 0.11................... 0.28 Energy Answers....................... Arecibo................ DID NOT EXIST IN 2011.. 0.3059 TBRCI................................ Arecibo................ 1.21................... 0.01 Safetech Corporation................. Arecibo................ 0.009.................. 0.009 Eaton................................ Arecibo................ 0.000062............... 0.00075 ANJ Airport.......................... Arecibo................ 0.00364................ 0.037 Abbott (Now Abbvie Ltd.)............. Barceloneta............ 0.0088................. 0.0161 Pfizer Pharmaceuticals LLC........... Barceloneta............ 0.001.................. 0.0035 Merck Sharp & Dohme+................. Barceloneta............ 0.00037................ 0.018 Sunbeam Synergy...................... Barceloneta............ DID NOT EXIST IN 2011.. 0.11 ------------------------------------------------- Total............................ ....................... 1.343.................. 0.79025 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- c. Attainment Plan Modeling The Puerto Rico modeling analysis was prepared using the EPA's preferred dispersion modeling system, AERMOD, consisting of the AERMOD model and two data input preprocessors AERMET and AERMAP, consistent with the EPA's Modeling Guidance at 40 CFR part 51 Appendix W and 40 CFR part 51.117. More detailed information on the AERMOD Modeling system and other modeling tools and documents can be found on the EPA Technology Transfer Network Support Center for Regulatory Atmospheric Modeling (SCRAM) (http://www.the EPA.gov/ttn/scram/) and in Puerto Rico's submittal for this proposed action (EPA-R02-OAR-2016-0559) on the www.regulations.gov Web site. A brief description of the modeling used to support the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico's attainment demonstration is provided below. i. Modeling Approach The following is an overview of the air quality modeling approach used to demonstrate compliance with the 2008 Lead NAAQS, in Puerto Rico's SIP submittal. To develop the appropriate meteorological data for the area for use in the attainment demonstration, the PREQB used AERMOD pre-processors, AERMET and AERMAP to process site specific meteorological data collected at PREPA Cambalache. Data from San Juan Airport was also used to supplement the PREPA data in those instances where meteorological data may have been missing. The PREQB used the EPA LEADPOST processor to calculate the lead three-month rolling average. To determine the lead background concentration that would be representative of the Arecibo area, the PREQB conducted a multi-source modelling analysis with projected or controlled emissions to 2016 of the facilities in the six municipalities (Arecibo, Barceloneta, Ciales, Florida, Hatillo and Utuado), including the Arecibo Airport. This approach was used because the PREQB does not have an Arecibo lead air quality monitor that is not affected by the emissions from TBRCI facility that would be representative of the Arecibo area. The PREQB developed the 2011 base year and the 2016 control strategy emissions inventories for input in the air quality model to perform current and control dispersion modeling. The emissions inventory was used in the multi-source modeling scenario (see modeling protocol in SIP submittal Appendix C and Appendix C-1). ii. Modeling Results The Lead NAAQS compliance results of the AERMOD modeling are summarized in Table 2 below. As can be seen in Table 2, the maximum three-month rolling average predicted impact with the meteorological data (2006-2010) is less than the 2008 Lead NAAQS of 0.15 [mu]g/m\3\ for the AERMOD modeling runs. Output from the LEADPOST processor which details all of the concentrations can be found in the August 30, 2016 submittal. Table 2--Summary Results of Modeling for 2016 Attainment Deadline -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Maximum monthly Maximum 3-high predicted avg. predicted NAAQS ([mu]g/ Impact greater Pollutant Avg. time impact ([mu]g/ impact ([mu]g/ m\3\) than NAAQS m\3\) m\3\) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lead............................................ 3-month rolling................... 0.11318 0.09352 0.15 No -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[Page 78101]] The post control scenario used in the model is heavily influenced by the operating status of TBRCI. Based on the post control scenario of TBRCI not operating, the model predicts an impact of 0.09352 [mu]g/ m\3\. This data indicates significant reductions in air quality impacts with the non-operation closure of the TBRCI facility resulting in attainment of the lead NAAQS. The EPA has reviewed the modeling that Puerto Rico submitted to support the attainment demonstration for the Arecibo Area and has determined that this modeling is consistent with CAA requirements, 40 CFR part 51, Appendix W, and the EPA Lead Guidance for lead attainment demonstration modeling. d. RACM/RACT Requirements CAA section 172(c)(1) requires that each attainment plan provide for the implementation of all RACM for stationary sources as expeditiously as practicable for attainment of the NAAQS. The EPA interprets RACM, including RACT, under CAA section 172, as measures that a State determines to be both reasonably available and to contribute to attainment as expeditiously as practicable in the nonattainment area. A comprehensive discussion of the RACM/RACT requirement for lead attainment plans can be found in the EPA guidance (footnote 3). TBRCI was the only source of lead emissions of 0.5 tpy or more. TBRCI was the primary source of lead emissions in the Arecibo area contributing to monitored nonattainment. Therefore, the RACT/RACM requirements would focus primarily on TBRCI. However, on June 12, 2014, TBRCI notified the PREQB that it would ``temporarily cease operations''. As discussed in Section IV.b.1 above, on August 19, 2015, the PREQB withdrew both the Construction Permit and Title V Operation Permit for TBRCI because the facility was unable to comply with Puerto Rico Rule 203(b)(1) and Puerto Rico Rule 604(b) as well as CAA Section 112 (See footnote 3). Since the PREQB withdrew TBRCI permits, TBRCI is no longer operating. Since TBRCI is no longer operating, there are no further RACT or RACM necessary for the area to attain the lead NAAQS as expeditiously as practicable or by the December 2016 attainment date. The EPA notes that TBRCI has no permits to operate as a secondary lead smelter facility. Should TBRCI or any other entity decide to start up business as a secondary lead smelter facility in the Arecibo area, the company will need to obtain the appropriate permits to operate in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the EPA, including the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Regulations for the Control of the Atmospheric Pollution (RCAP), the Puerto Rico Environmental Public Policy Act, Act 416-2004 as amended (PREPPA Act 416) and CAA Section 112 MACT requirements. These laws and regulations ensure that any new source of lead emissions, or any emission, will not interfere with attainment of the NAAQS. With respect to fugitive emissions and for all emission sources, the Puerto Rico SIP already includes control measures located in RCAP Rule 404 (also referenced in the August 30, 2016 submittal).\5\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \5\ 62 FR 3213 (Jan. 22, 1997) (approval of RCAP 404 into SIP); 40 CFR 52.2723. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- RCAP Rule 404: Where no person shall cause or permit any materials to be handled, transported, or stored in a building, its appurtenances, or a road to be used, constructed altered, repaired, or demolished, without taking reasonable precautions to prevent particulate matter (including particulate matter containing lead) from becoming airborne including but not limited to: Rule 404(A)(1): The use, as much as possible, of water or suitable chemicals for chemical stabilization and the control of dust in the demolition of a building or structures, construction operations, quarrying operations, the grading of roads, or the clearing of land; Rule 404(A)(4): The covering, at all times when in motion, of open bodied trucks transporting materials likely to give rise to airborne dusts; Rule 404(A)(3): The installation and use of hoods, fans, and fabric filters to enclose and vent dusty materials to control harmless fugitive emissions. Adequate containment methods shall also be employed during sandblasting or other similar operations; Rule 404(A)(6): The paving of road ways and their maintenance in a clean condition; Rule 404(B): Where no person shall cause or permit the discharge of visible emissions of fugitive dust beyond the boundary line of the property on which the emissions originate; Rule 404(C): Where air pollutant escape from a building or equipment and cause a nuisance or violate any regulations, the Board may order that the building or equipment in which processing, handling, and storage are done, be tightly closed and/or ventilated so that all emissions from the building or equipment are controlled to remove or destroy such air pollutants before being discharged to the open air; and, Rule 404(E): Where any new or modified source, the construction of which causes or may cause fugitive emissions, shall apply for a permit as required in Rule 203. e. RFP Requirements Section 172(c)(2) of the CAA requires that an attainment plan includes a demonstration that shows reasonable further progress to meeting air quality standards. The term ``reasonable further progress'' is defined in CAA section 171 to mean ``such annual incremental reductions in the emissions of the relevant air pollutant as are required . . . for purpose of ensuring attainment of the applicable national ambient air quality standard by the applicable date.'' In accordance with CAA section 172(c)(1), the RFP requires implementation of all RACM/RACT as ``expeditiously as practicable.'' Historically, for some pollutants, RFP has been met by showing annual incremental emission reductions generally sufficient to maintain linear progress toward attainment by the applicable attainment date. As stated in the final Lead Rule (73 FR 67039), the EPA concluded that it was appropriate that RFP requirements be satisfied by the strict adherence to an ambitious compliance schedule, which is expected to periodically yield significant emission reductions. For lead nonattainment areas, RFP is to be achieved by implementing an emission reduction compliance schedule for stationary sources outlined in the SIP. The stationary source of concern in the Arecibo area is TBRCI. As discussed in Section V.d, TBRCI is no longer operating. Therefore the EPA proposes to find that RFP has been achieved in the Arecibo area because the emission reduction compliance schedule for the one stationary source in question, TBRCI, has been achieved by no longer operating. f. Contingency Measures Section 172(c)(9) of CAA requires that SIPs include specific contingency measures to be undertaken if the area fails to make reasonable further progress or to attain the 2008 lead NAAQS by the attainment date which is December 31, 2016, for Arecibo, Puerto Rico. Upon determination by the EPA that the area has failed to achieve or maintain RFP, or attain the lead NAAQS by the statutory attainment date, these contingency measures will take effect without further action by the State or the Administrator. The amount of reductions yielded by implementation of contingency measures should be quantified and, for a five-year plan, the [[Page 78102]] measures should reduce emissions by 20 percent of the total amount needed for attainment. Under certain circumstances, this amount may be derived by reference to reductions in ambient air concentrations (2008 lead NAAQS Implementation Q&A, July 8, 2011, EPA). The PREQB asserts that a comprehensive evaluation of all known lead emissions sources has already been accomplished and that RACT (or greater) levels of controls have been addressed, as discussed in the control measures section of the August 30, 2016 submittal. Contingency measures are intended to address any lead emissions that would cause any future exceedances of the lead NAAQS. The PREPPA Act 416, Title II, Section 9(A)(7) provides PREQB with the authority to order persons causing or contributing to a condition which harms the environment and natural resources or which poses an imminent danger for the public health and safety, to immediately diminish or discontinue their actions. Also, PREPPA Act 416, Title II, Section 9(A)(8) provides the authority to issue orders to do or forbear or to cease and desist so as to take the preventive or control measures that, in its judgment, are necessary to achieve the purposes of this Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder. As discussed above, RCAP Rule 404, which is approved into the SIP, contains specific provisions to control fugitive emissions at any facility in Puerto Rico are intended to satisfy the CAA 172(c)(9) contingency measure requirements. In addition to the contingency measures in the Lead SIP, the PREQB included actions it will take to better characterize the source of any exceedance: If during any three-month rolling period, if two samples at the same monitor in the Arecibo Nonattainment Area are reported to exceed 0.15 [mu]g/m\3\, along with the activities above, the PREQB will increase the sampling frequency at that monitor to once every three days; In addition, if during any three-month rolling period, if three samples at the same monitor in the Arecibo Nonattainment Area are reported to exceed 0.15 [mu]g/m\3\, along with the activities above, the PREQB will conduct daily sampling at that monitor for a period of 30 days. The EPA has determined that the PREQB's SIP addresses the requirement for contingency measures pursuant to CAA 172(c)(9) and therefore EPA proposes to approve these contingency measures. g. Attainment Date Puerto Rico provided a modeling demonstration to attain the level of the 2008 Lead NAAQS for the Arecibo Area by no later than five years after the Area was designated nonattainment. The modeling indicates that the Arecibo Area will have attaining data for the 2008 Lead NAAQS by December 31, 2016. On June 12, 2014, TBRCI notified the PREQB that it would ``temporarily cease operations''. As discussed in Section IV.b.1 above, on August 19, 2015, the PREQB withdrew both the Construction Permit and the Title V Operating Permit for TBRCI because the facility was unable to comply with subject regulations of Puerto Rico RCAP Rules 203(b)(1) and 604(b) as well as the CAA Section 112 (see footnote 3). The EPA notes that since September 2015, the data from the source oriented Arecibo air monitoring site has been below the three-month rolling average for the Lead NAAQS. In addition, the modeling demonstrates compliance with the Lead NAAQS. Consequently, the EPA proposes that the PREQB has provided an attainment demonstration SIP that shows how the Arecibo area will meet the Lead NAAQS. V. What are the EPA's conclusions? The EPA is proposing to approve into the SIP Puerto Rico's lead attainment plan for the Arecibo Area. Specifically, the EPA is proposing to approve Puerto Rico's August 30, 2016 submittal, which includes the attainment demonstration, base year emissions inventory, modelling, and contingency measures and addresses RACM/RACT and the RFP plan. Permits for the lead smelter, TBRCI, documented as the source of high lead emissions, have been withdrawn and it is not operating at this time. Accordingly, RACM, RACT and RFP analyses have been met. The requirement for RACM/RACT and RFP plan is satisfied because the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico demonstrated that the Area will attain the 2008 Lead NAAQS as expeditiously as practicable, and could not implement any additional measures to attain the NAAQS any sooner. The EPA notes that since September 2015, the data from the source oriented Arecibo air monitoring site has been below the three-month rolling average for the Lead NAAQS. The EPA's review of the materials submitted indicates that Puerto Rico has developed the Lead attainment plan in accordance with the requirements of the CAA, 40 CFR part 51 and the EPA's technical requirements for a Lead SIP. Therefore, the EPA is proposing to approve into the SIP the Lead attainment plan for Arecibo, Puerto Rico. VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action: Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4); Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and, Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, this proposed rulemaking action does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, [[Page 78103]] and the EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law. List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: October 27, 2016. Judith Enck, Regional Administrator, Region 2. [FR Doc. 2016-26729 Filed 11-4-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 215 / Monday, November 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules 78097
policies, procedures, or practices with (4) Name, address, and telephone laboratory as an application for a
the Federal agency when the Federal number of the representative of the license.
agency’s review discloses that the applicant to whom correspondence Kent Rochford,
contractor could take reasonable steps to should be sent;
Associate Director for Laboratory Programs.
implement more effectively the (5) Nature and type of applicant’s
requirements of this paragraph (k)(4). [FR Doc. 2016–25325 Filed 11–4–16; 8:45 am]
business, identifying products or BILLING CODE 3510–13–P
The Federal agency or the contractor
services which the applicant has
may request that the Secretary review
successfully commercialized, and
the contractor’s licensing program and
approximate number of applicant’s ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
decisions regarding small business
applicants. employees; AGENCY
(l) * * * (6) Source of information concerning
[Complete according to instructions at the availability of a license on the 40 CFR Part 52
§ 401.5(b)] invention; [EPA–R02–OAR–2016–0559; FRL–9954–97–
■ 9. In § 401.16: Region 2]
■ a. Remove the word ‘‘may’’ from
(7) A statement indicating whether
paragraphs (a), (b), and (c), and add in the applicant is a small business firm as Approval of Air Quality Implementation
its place the word ‘‘shall’’; and defined in § 404.3(c) Plans; Puerto Rico; Attainment
■ b. Add paragraph (d). (8) A detailed description of Demonstration for the Arecibo Lead
The addition reads as follows: applicant’s plan for development or Nonattainment Area
marketing of the invention, or both,
§ 401.16 Electronic filing. AGENCY: Environmental Protection
which should include:
* * * * * Agency.
(d) Other written notices required in (i) A statement of the time, nature and ACTION: Proposed rule.
this clause may be electronically amount of anticipated investment of
delivered to the agency or the contractor capital and other resources which SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
through an electronic database used for applicant believes will be required to Agency is proposing to approve a State
reporting subject inventions, patents, bring the invention to practical Implementation Plan dated August 30,
and utilization reports to the funding application; 2016, submitted by the Commonwealth
agency. of Puerto Rico to the EPA, for the
(ii) A statement as to applicant’s purpose of providing for attainment of
■ 11. Revise § 401.17 to read as follows:
capability and intention to fulfill the the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air
§ 401.17 Submissions and inquiries. plan, including information regarding Quality Standards in the Arecibo Lead
All submissions or inquiries should manufacturing, marketing, financial, nonattainment area. The Arecibo
be directed to the Chief Counsel for and technical resources; nonattainment Area is comprised of a
NIST, National Institute of Standards (iii) A statement of the fields of use portion of Arecibo Municipality in
and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Mail for which applicant intends to practice Puerto Rico with a 4 kilometer radius
Stop 1052, Gaithersburg, Maryland the invention; and surrounding The Battery Recycling
20899–1052; telephone: (301) 975–2803; Company, Inc. Puerto Rico initially
(iv) A statement of the geographic
email: nistcounsel@nist.gov. Information submitted a lead SIP revision for the
areas in which applicant intends to
about and procedures for electronic Arecibo area on January 30, 2015. The
manufacture any products embodying
filing under this Part are available at the EPA proposed to disapprove the January
the invention and geographic areas
Interagency Edison Web site and service 30, 2015 submittal on February 29,
center, http://www.iedison.gov, where applicant intends to use or sell
2016. The PREQB rescinded the January
telephone (301) 435–1986. the invention, or both;
30, 2015 submittal and replaced it with
(9) Identification of licenses the August 30, 2016 lead SIP submittal
PART 404—LICENSING OF previously granted to applicant under for the Arecibo area.
GOVERNMENT OWNED INVENTIONS federally owned inventions; DATES: Comments must be received on
■ 12. The authority citation for 37 CFR (10) A statement containing or before December 7, 2016.
part 404 continues to read as follows: applicant’s best knowledge of the extent ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
Authority: 35 U.S.C. 207–209, DOO 30– to which the invention is being identified by Docket ID number EPA–
2A. practiced by private industry or R02–OAR–2016–0559 at http://
Government, or both, or is otherwise www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
■ 13. Revise § 404.8 to read as follows:
available commercially; and instructions for submitting comments.
§ 404.8 Application for a license. (11) Any other information which Once submitted, comments cannot be
(a) An application for a license should applicant believes will support a edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
be addressed to the Federal agency The EPA may publish any comment
determination to grant the license to
having custody of the invention and received to its public docket. Do not
applicant.
shall normally include: submit electronically any information
(1) Identification of the invention for (b) An executed CRADA which you consider to be Confidential
which the license is desired including provides for the use for research and Business Information (CBI) or other
development purposes by the CRADA information whose disclosure is
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
the patent application serial number or
patent number, title, and date, if known; collaborator under that CRADA of a restricted by statute. Multimedia
(2) Identification of the type of license Federally-owned invention in the submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
for which the application is submitted; Federal laboratory’s custody (pursuant accompanied by a written comment.
(3) Name and address of the person, to 35 U.S.C. 209 and 15 U.S.C. The written comment is considered the
company, or organization applying for 3710a(b)(1)), and which addresses the official comment and should include
the license and the citizenship or place information in paragraph (a) of this discussion of all points you wish to
of incorporation of the applicant; section, may be treated by the Federal make. The EPA will generally not
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:12 Nov 04, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\07NOP1.SGM 07NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_78312/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 215 / Monday, November 7, 2016 / Proposed Rules 78103
and the EPA notes that it will not submission of written comments on the (202) 366–5370. Facsimile: (202) 366–
impose substantial direct costs on tribal proposal, including comments on the 8842. For legal issues, you may contact
governments or preempt tribal law. Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis Mr. Charles Medalen, Office of Chief
and Initial Regulatory Flexibility Counsel, Telephone (202) 366–1354.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Analysis and Draft Environmental Facsimile: (202) 366–3602. You may
Environmental protection, Air Assessment accompanying the proposal, send mail to these officials at: The
pollution control, Incorporation by by 30 days. Federal Motor Carrier Safety
reference, Intergovernmental relations, DATES: Written comments must be Administration, Attention: MC–PSV,
Lead, Reporting and recordkeeping received by December 7, 2016. 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
requirements. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, Washington, DC 20590.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. identified by one or both of the docket SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
Dated: October 27, 2016. numbers in the heading of this September 7, 2016, NHTSA and FMCSA
Judith Enck, document, by any of the following published a notice of proposed
methods: rulemaking (NPRM) proposing
Regional Administrator, Region 2.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations that would require vehicles
[FR Doc. 2016–26729 Filed 11–4–16; 8:45 am]
http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the with a gross vehicle weight rating of
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P more than 11,793.4 kilograms (26,000
online instructions for submitting
comments. pounds) to be equipped with a speed
• Mail: Docket Management Facility, limiting device initially set to a speed
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION M–30, U.S. Department of no greater than a speed to be specified
Transportation, West Building, Ground in a final rule and would require motor
National Highway Traffic Safety Floor, Rm. W12–140, 1200 New Jersey carriers operating such vehicles in
Administration Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. interstate commerce to maintain
• Hand Delivery or Courier: West functional speed limiting devices set to
49 CFR Part 571 Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, a speed no greater than a speed to be
[Docket No. NHTSA–2016–0087] 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between specified in the final rule for the service
9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday life of the vehicle.
RIN 2127–AK92 through Friday, except Federal holidays. The American Trucking Associations
• Fax: (202) 493–2251. (ATA) (with the support of the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Instructions: For detailed instructions Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance),
Administration on submitting comments and additional the EMA Truck & Engine Manufacturers
information on the rulemaking process, Association (EMA) and the Owner
49 CFR Part 393 see the discussion under the Public Operator Independent Drivers
[Docket No. FMCSA–2014–0083] Participation heading of the September Association (OOIDA) have requested
7, 2016 notice of proposed rulemaking that NHTSA and FMCSA extend the
RIN 2126–AB63 (81 FR 61942). Note that all comments public comment period beyond the
received will be posted without change November 7, 2016 date specified in the
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety to http://www.regulations.gov, including NPRM. The ATA and EMA requested a
Standards; Federal Motor Carrier any personal information provided. 30-day extension. In support of its
Safety Regulations; Parts and Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search request, ATA states that the proposal
Accessories Necessary for Safe the electronic form of all comments differs significantly from its initial
Operation; Speed Limiting Devices received into any of our dockets by the petition for rulemaking in a number of
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic name of the individual submitting the areas, and additional time is needed to
Safety Administration (NHTSA) and comment (or signing the comment, if confer with its membership on these
Federal Motor Carrier Safety submitted on behalf of an association, issues. EMA states that at least 30
Administration (FMCSA), Department business, labor union, etc.). You may additional days is needed to more
of Transportation. review DOT’s complete Privacy Act thoroughly analyze the issues in order
ACTION: Extension of comment period.
Statement in the Federal Register to develop detailed and complete
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume comments.
SUMMARY: NHTSA and FMCSA have 65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or you The OOIDA requested a 60-day
received requests to extend the may visit http://dms.dot.gov. extension of the comment period. In
comment period for their proposal that FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: support of its request, OOIDA states that
would require vehicles with a gross NHTSA: For technical issues, you it will take a considerable amount of
vehicle weight rating of more than may contact Mr. Wayne McKenzie, time and resources to develop
11,793.4 kilograms (26,000 pounds) to Office of Crash Avoidance Standards, meaningful comments from its
be equipped with a speed limiting Telephone: (202) 366–4000. Facsimile: members, many of which are on the
device and that such device be (202) 366–7002. For legal issues, you road and away from home upwards of
maintained for the service life of the may contact Mr. David Jasinski, Office 250 days a year.
vehicle. In the proposal, NHTSA and of Chief Counsel, Telephone (202) 366– NHTSA and FMCSA have also
FMCSA established a deadline for the 2992. Facsimile: (202) 366–3820. You received a letter signed by a number of
submission of written comments of safety advocacy groups and individuals
ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
may send mail to these officials at: The
November 7, 2016. The Agencies have National Highway Traffic Safety opposing any extension of the comment
also received a letter opposing any Administration, Attention: NVS–010, period. The letter states that in the 10
extension of the comment period. To 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., years since the petitions for rulemaking
ensure that all interested parties have a Washington, DC 20590. were initially filed, truck crashes and
sufficient amount of time to fully FMCSA: For technical issues, you may fatalities have increased at rates faster
develop their comments, the Agencies contact Mr. Michael Huntley, Vehicle than overall crashes and fatalities, and
are extending the deadline for the and Roadside Operations, Telephone that additional time for comment is not
VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:12 Nov 04, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\07NOP1.SGM 07NOP1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_78312/page/7.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-14 08:21:21
Document Modified: 2018-02-14 08:21:21
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Proposed Rules | |
| Action | Proposed rule. | |
| Dates | Comments must be received on or before December 7, 2016. | |
| Contact | Mazeeda Khan, Air Programs Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007-1866, (212) 637-3715, or by email at [email protected] | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 78097 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Air Pollution Control; Incorporation by Reference; Intergovernmental Relations; Lead and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR