81 FR 78509 - Fluxapyroxad; Pesticide Tolerances
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 216 (November 8, 2016)
Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 216 (November 8, 2016)
| Page Range | 78509-78513 | |
| FR Document | 2016-26966 |
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 216 (Tuesday, November 8, 2016)] [Rules and Regulations] [Pages 78509-78513] From the Federal Register Online [www.thefederalregister.org] [FR Doc No: 2016-26966] ======================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 180 [EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0380; FRL-9953-87] Fluxapyroxad; Pesticide Tolerances AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of fluxapyroxad in or on banana, coffee green bean, mango, and papaya. BASF Corporation requested these tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), to ensure that residues on these commodities when imported into the United States would be in compliance with the FFDCA. DATES: This regulation is effective November 8, 2016. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before January 9, 2017, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0380, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305-5805. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Goodis, Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include:Crop production (NAICS code 111). Animal production (NAICS code 112). Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311). Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532). B. How can I get electronic access to other related information? You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government Printing Office's e-CFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl. To access the OCSPP test guidelines referenced in this document electronically, please go to http://www.epa.gov/ocspp and select ``Test Methods and Guidelines.'' C. How can I file an objection or hearing request? Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0380 in the subject line on the first page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before January 9, 2017. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b). In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP- [[Page 78510]] 2016-0380, by one of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance In the Federal Register of August 29, 2016 (81 FR 59165) (FRL-9950- 22), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition PP 5E8366 by BASF Corporation, 26 Davis Drive, P.O. Box 13528, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-3528. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.666 be amended by establishing tolerances for residues of the fungicide fluxapyroxad, in or on banana at 3.0 parts per million (ppm); coffee, green bean at 0.2 ppm; mango at 0.7 ppm; and papaya at 0.6 ppm. That document referenced a summary of the petition prepared by BASF Corporation, the registrant, which is available in the docket, http://www.regulations.gov. There were no comments received in response to the notice of filing. III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . .'' Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available scientific data and other relevant information in support of this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a determination on aggregate exposure for fluxapyroxad including exposure resulting from the tolerances established by this action. EPA's assessment of exposures and risks associated with fluxapyroxad follows. A. Toxicological Profile EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and children. The Agency recently published a tolerance rulemaking for fluxapyroxad. See Federal Register of May 5, 2016 (81 FR 27019) (FRL- 9945-48). The toxicological profile and endpoints used for human risk assessment have not changed since that time. Therefore, the Agency is relying on that discussion of the toxicological profile and the toxicological endpoints for this rulemaking as well. Please refer to Unit III. B of the final rule published in the Federal Register of May 5, 2016 (81 FR 27019) (FRL-9945-48). In addition, specific information on the studies received and the nature of the adverse effects caused by fluxapyroxad as well as the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies can be found at http://www.regulations.gov in document, ``Human Health Risk Assessment for Use of Fluxaproxad on Imported Banana, Coffee, Mango, and Papaya.'' at pp. 12 in docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP- 2016-0380. B. Exposure Assessment 1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. In evaluating dietary exposure to fluxapyroxad, EPA considered exposure under the petitioned- for tolerances as well as all existing fluxapyroxad tolerances in 40 CFR 180.666. EPA assessed dietary exposures from fluxapyroxad in food as follows: i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute dietary exposure and risk assessments are performed for a food-use pesticide, if a toxicological study has indicated the possibility of an effect of concern occurring as a result of a 1-day or single exposure. Such effects were identified for fluxapyroxad. In estimating acute dietary exposure, EPA used food consumption information from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) 2003-2008 food consumption data NHANES/WWEIA. Tolerance level residues adjusted to account for the metabolites of concern (M700F008) and 100% crop treated assumptions were used for all plant commodities. ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting the chronic dietary exposure assessment EPA used the food consumption data from the USDA 2003-2008 CSFII. As to residue levels in food, EPA conducted a moderately refined chronic dietary exposure analysis for the general U.S. population and various population subgroups. Average field trial residues for parent plus maximum metabolite residue were used for all plant commodities. An assumption of 100% crop treated was also used for the chronic dietary analysis. DEEM default and empirical processing factors were used. iii. Cancer. Based on the data summarized in Unit III.A., EPA has concluded that fluxapyroxad does not pose a cancer risk to humans. Therefore, a dietary exposure assessment for the purpose of assessing cancer risk is unnecessary. iv. Anticipated residue and percent crop treated (PCT) information. Section 408(b)(2)(E) of FFDCA authorizes EPA to use available data and information on the anticipated residue levels of pesticide residues in food and the actual levels of pesticide residues that have been measured in food. If EPA relies on such information, EPA must require pursuant to FFDCA section 408(f)(1) that data be provided 5 years after the tolerance is established, modified, or left in effect, demonstrating that the levels in food are not above the levels anticipated. For the present action, EPA will issue such data call-ins as are required by FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(E) and authorized under FFDCA section 408(f)(1). Data will be required to be submitted no later than 5 years from the date of issuance of these tolerances. 2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency used screening level water exposure models in the dietary exposure analysis and risk assessment for fluxapyroxad in drinking water. [[Page 78511]] These simulation models take into account data on the physical, chemical, and fate/transport characteristics of fluxapyroxad. Further information regarding EPA drinking water models used in pesticide exposure assessment can be found at http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/index.htm. Based on the Pesticide Root Zone Model Ground Water (PRZM/GW), the estimated drinking water concentrations (EDWCs) of fluxapyroxad for acute exposures are 127 ppb parts per billion (ppb) for surface water and 203 ppb for ground water. The EDWCs for chronic exposures for non- cancer assessments are 127 ppb for surface water and 188 ppb for ground water. Modeled estimates of drinking water concentrations were directly entered into the dietary exposure model. For acute dietary risk assessment, the water concentration value of 203 ppb was used to assess the contribution to drinking water. For chronic dietary risk assessment, the water concentration value of 188 ppb was used to assess the contribution to drinking water. 3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control, termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets). There is no residential exposure associated with the proposed uses of fluxapyroxad in this action; however, there are existing turf uses that were previously assessed for fluxapyroxad. Although the Agency had conducted a residential exposure assessment for previous fluxapyroxad actions, the Agency completed an updated turf assessment to reflect an update in the single maximum application rate from 2.47 lb active ingredient (ai)/gallon to 0.005 lb ai/gallon. The present assessment assumed the following exposure scenarios: Residential handler: The Agency assessed inhalation exposures to adults from applications only because fluxapyroxad does not pose a dermal risk. Residential handler exposure is expected to be short-term in duration. Intermediate-term exposures are not likely because of the intermittent nature of applications by homeowners. Post-application exposures: Dermal exposures were not assessed because there is no identified systemic dermal hazard for fluxapyroxad. Post-application inhalation exposure while engaged in activities on or around previously treated turf is generally not quantitatively assessed. The combination of low vapor pressure for chemicals typically used as active ingredients in outdoor residential pesticide products and dilution in outdoor air is likely to result in minimal inhalation exposure. Incidental oral exposure for children is anticipated. The quantitative oral exposure/risk assessment for residential post-application exposures is based on the incidental oral scenario for children 1 to <2 years old. Further information regarding EPA standard assumptions and generic inputs for residential exposures may be found at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/trac/science/trac6a05.pdf. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity.'' EPA has not found fluxapyroxad to share a common mechanism of toxicity with any other substances, and fluxapyroxad does not appear to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has assumed that fluxapyroxad does not have a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative. C. Safety Factor for Infants and Children 1. In general. Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply an additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity and exposure unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a different margin of safety will be safe for infants and children. This additional margin of safety is commonly referred to as the FQPA Safety Factor (SF). In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default value of 10X, or uses a different additional safety factor when reliable data available to EPA support the choice of a different factor. 2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity. No evidence of quantitative susceptibility was observed in a reproductive and developmental toxicity study in rats or in developmental toxicity studies in rats and rabbits. Developmental toxicity data in rats showed decreased body weight and body weight gain in the offspring at the same dose levels that caused thyroid follicular hypertrophy/hyperplasia in parental animals. Effects in rabbits were limited to paw hyperflexion, a malformation that is not considered to result from a single exposure and that usually reverses as the animal matures. Developmental effects observed in both rats and rabbits occurred at the same doses as those that caused adverse effects in maternal animals, indicating no quantitative susceptibility. The Agency has low concern for developmental toxicity because the observed effects were of low severity, were likely secondary to maternal toxicity, and demonstrated clear NOAELs. Further, the NOAELs for these effects were at dose levels higher than the points of departure selected for risk assessment for repeat-exposure scenarios. Therefore, based on the available data and the selection of risk assessment endpoints that are protective of developmental effects, there are no residual uncertainties with regard to pre- and/or postnatal toxicity. 3. Conclusion. EPA has determined that reliable data show the safety of infants and children would be adequately protected if the FQPA SF were reduced to 1X. That decision is based on the following findings: i. The toxicity database for fluxapyroxad is complete. ii. There is no indication that fluxapyroxad is a neurotoxic chemical and there is no need for a developmental neurotoxicity study or additional UFs to account for neurotoxicity. Although an acute neurotoxicity study showed decreased rearing and motor activity, this occurred on the day of dosing only in the absence of histopathological effects or alterations in brain weights. This indicated that any neurotoxic effects of fluxapyroxad are likely to be transient and reversible due to alterations in neuropharmacology and not from neuronal damage. The Agency has low concern for neurotoxic effects of fluxapyroxad at any life stage. iii. Based on the developmental and reproductive toxicity studies discussed in Unit III.C.2., there are no residual uncertainties with regard to prenatal and/or postnatal toxicity. iv. There are no residual uncertainties identified in the exposure databases. The residue database is adequate. The dietary risk assessment is conservative and will not underestimate dietary exposure to fluxapyroxad. There are existing turf uses that were previously assessed and approved for fluxapyroxad. The assessment will not underestimate residential exposure via [[Page 78512]] handler for adults and incidental oral for children. EPA made conservative (protective) assumptions in the ground and surface water modeling used to assess exposure to fluxapyroxad in drinking water. EPA used similarly conservative assumptions to assess post application exposure of children as well as incidental oral exposure of toddlers. There are residential uses proposed for fluxapyroxad and the assessment will not underestimate residential exposure via handler for adults and incidental oral for children. D. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety EPA determines whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide exposures are safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the acute PAD (aPAD) and chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer risks, EPA calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the estimated aggregate exposure. Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term risks are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water, and residential exposure to the appropriate PODs to ensure that an adequate MOE exists. 1. Acute risk. Using the exposure assumptions discussed in this unit for acute exposure, the acute dietary exposure from food and water to fluxapyroxad will occupy 13% of the PAD for children 1 to 2 years old, the population group receiving the greatest exposure. 2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described in this unit for chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that chronic exposure to fluxapyroxad from food and water will utilize 70% of the cPAD for infants (<1 year old). There are no residential use patterns associated with the proposed uses in this action; however, there are residential exposure from existing turf uses that were previously assessed for fluxapyroxad. As a result, aggregate risk is represented by chronic dietary (food and water) and residential exposure. As reflected is these assessments, there are no risk concerns. 3. Short-term risk. Short-term aggregate exposure takes into account short-term residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food and water (considered to be a background exposure level). Fluxapyroxad is currently registered for uses that could result in short-term residential exposure, and the Agency has determined that it is appropriate to aggregate chronic exposure through food and water with short-term residential exposures to fluxapyroxad. Using the exposure assumptions described in this unit for short-term exposures, EPA has concluded the combined short-term food, water, and residential exposures result in aggregate MOEs of 1,139 for adults and 431 for children. Because EPA's level of concern for fluxapyroxad is a MOE of 100 or below, these MOEs are not of concern. 4. Intermediate-term risk. Intermediate-term aggregate exposure takes into account intermediate-term residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food and water (considered to be a background exposure level). An intermediate-term adverse effect was identified; however, fluxapyroxad is not registered for any use patterns that would result in intermediate-term residential exposure. Intermediate-term risk is assessed based on intermediate-term residential exposure plus chronic dietary exposure. Because there is no intermediate-term residential exposure and chronic dietary exposure has already been assessed under the appropriately protective cPAD (which is at least as protective as the POD used to assess intermediate-term risk), no further assessment of intermediate-term risk is necessary, and EPA relies on the chronic dietary risk assessment for evaluating intermediate-term risk for fluxapyroxad. 5. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. As discussed in Unit III.A., EPA has classified fluxapyroxad as ``Not likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans'' based on convincing evidence that carcinogenic effects are not likely below a defined dose range. The Agency has determined that the quantification of risk using the cPAD for fluxapyroxad will adequately account for all chronic toxicity, including carcinogenicity that could result from exposure to fluxapyroxad. Because the Agency has determined fluxapyroxad will not cause a chronic risk, the Agency concludes that fluxapyroxad will not pose a cancer risk for the U.S. population. 6. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to the general population, or to infants and children from aggregate exposure to fluxapyroxad residues. IV. Other Considerations A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology There is a suitable residue analytical method available for enforcement of fluxapyroxad tolerances for plants (BASF Methods L0137/ 01) which has been radio validated and has undergone successful validation by an independent laboratory. There are liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method and monitors two ion transitions. The Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) for BASF method L0137/01 is 0.01 ppm for various matrices. B. International Residue Limits In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain the reasons for departing from the Codex level. The Codex has not established a MRL for fluxapyroxad. V. Conclusion Therefore, tolerances are established without a U.S. registration for residues of fluxapyroxad in or on banana at 3.0 parts per million (ppm); coffee green bean at 0.2 ppm; mango at 0.7 ppm; and papaya at 0.6 ppm. VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled [[Page 78513]] ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply. This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this action alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). VII. Congressional Review Act Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: October 24, 2016. Daniel J. Rosenblatt, Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows: PART 180--[AMENDED] 0 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows: Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 0 2. In Sec. 180.666, add alphabetically the entries ``Banana'', ``Coffee, green bean'', ``Mango'', and ``Papaya'' to the table in paragraph (a), and add footnote 1 to the table to read as follows: Sec. 180.666 Fluxapyroxad; tolerances for residues. (a) * * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Parts per Commodity million ------------------------------------------------------------------------ * * * * * Banana \1\.................................................. 3.0 * * * * * Coffee, green bean \1\...................................... 0.2 * * * * * Mango \1\................................................... 0.7 * * * * * Papaya \1\.................................................. 0.6 * * * * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------ \1\ There are no U.S. registrations for this commodity as of November 8, 2016. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2016-26966 Filed 11-7-16; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 78509
patrol the regulated area under the Dated: October 14, 2016. I. General Information
direction of a designated Coast Guard J.H. Snowden,
A. Does this action apply to me?
Patrol Commander. The Patrol Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Commander may be contacted on Port Mobile. You may be potentially affected by
Channel 16 VHF–FM (156.8 MHz) by [FR Doc. 2016–26961 Filed 11–7–16; 8:45 am] this action if you are an agricultural
the call sign ‘‘PATCOM’’. BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
producer, food manufacturer, or
(2) All persons and vessels not pesticide manufacturer. The following
registered with the sponsor as list of North American Industrial
participants or official patrol vessels are Classification System (NAICS) codes is
considered spectators. The ‘‘official ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
patrol vessels’’ consist of any Coast AGENCY provides a guide to help readers
Guard, state, or local law enforcement determine whether this document
and sponsor provided vessels assigned 40 CFR Part 180
applies to them. Potentially affected
or approved by the Captain of the Port [EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0380; FRL–9953–87] entities may include:
(COTP) Mobile to patrol the regulated • Crop production (NAICS code 111).
area. Fluxapyroxad; Pesticide Tolerances • Animal production (NAICS code
(3) Spectator vessels desiring to 112).
transit the regulated area may do so only AGENCY: Environmental Protection • Food manufacturing (NAICS code
with prior approval of the Patrol Agency (EPA). 311).
Commander and when so directed by ACTION: Final rule. • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
that officer will be operated at a code 32532).
minimum safe navigation speed in a SUMMARY: This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of fluxapyroxad B. How can I get electronic access to
manner which will not endanger other related information?
participants in the regulated area or any in or on banana, coffee green bean,
other vessels. mango, and papaya. BASF Corporation You may access a frequently updated
(4) No spectator vessel shall anchor, requested these tolerances under the electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
block, loiter, or impede the through Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
transit of participants or official patrol (FFDCA), to ensure that residues on the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR
vessels in the regulated area during the these commodities when imported into site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-
effective dates and times, unless cleared the United States would be in idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
for entry by or through an official patrol compliance with the FFDCA. 40tab_02.tpl. To access the OCSPP test
vessel. DATES: This regulation is effective guidelines referenced in this document
(5) The patrol commander may forbid November 8, 2016. Objections and electronically, please go to http://
and control the movement of all vessels requests for hearings must be received www.epa.gov/ocspp and select ‘‘Test
in the regulated area. When hailed or on or before January 9, 2017, and must Methods and Guidelines.’’
signaled by an official patrol vessel, a be filed in accordance with the C. How can I file an objection or hearing
vessel shall come to an immediate stop instructions provided in 40 CFR part request?
and comply with the directions given. 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
Failure to do so may result in expulsion SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
from the area, citation for failure to U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
comply, or both. objection to any aspect of this regulation
identified by docket identification (ID)
(6) Any spectator vessel may anchor and may also request a hearing on those
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2016–0380, is
outside the regulated area, but may not objections. You must file your objection
available at http://www.regulations.gov
anchor in, block, or loiter in a navigable or request a hearing on this regulation
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
channel. Spectator vessels may be in accordance with the instructions
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
moored to a waterfront facility within provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
in the Environmental Protection Agency
the regulated area in such a way that proper receipt by EPA, you must
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
they shall not interfere with the progress identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
of the event. Such mooring must be OPP–2016–0380 in the subject line on
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC
complete at least 30 minutes prior to the the first page of your submission. All
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
establishment of the regulated area and objections and requests for a hearing
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
remain moored through the duration of must be in writing, and must be
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
the event. received by the Hearing Clerk on or
holidays. The telephone number for the
(7) The Patrol Commander may before January 9, 2017. Addresses for
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
terminate the event or the operation of mail and hand delivery of objections
and the telephone number for the OPP
any vessel at any time it is deemed and hearing requests are provided in 40
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
necessary for the protection of life or CFR 178.25(b).
the visitor instructions and additional In addition to filing an objection or
property. information about the docket available
(8) The Patrol Commander will hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
terminate enforcement of the special
local regulations at the conclusion of the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: submit a copy of the filing (excluding
event. Michael Goodis, Registration Division any Confidential Business Information
(d) Informational broadcasts. The (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, (CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
COTP Mobile or a designated Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Information not marked confidential
representative will inform the public Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
through broadcast notices to mariners of DC 20460–0001; main telephone disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
the enforcement period for the regulated number: (703) 305–7090; email address: notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
area as well as any changes in the date RDFRNotices@epa.gov. objection or hearing request, identified
and times of enforcement. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:19 Nov 07, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM 08NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_78725/page/1.svg)
![Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 216 / Tuesday, November 8, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 78513
‘‘Federal Actions to Address does not impose any enforceable duty or PART 180—[AMENDED]
Environmental Justice in Minority contain any unfunded mandate as
Populations and Low-Income described under Title II of the Unfunded ■ 1. The authority citation for part 180
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. continues to read as follows:
1994). 1501 et seq.).
Since tolerances and exemptions that This action does not involve any Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
are established on the basis of a petition technical standards that would require ■ 2. In § 180.666, add alphabetically the
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as Agency consideration of voluntary entries ‘‘Banana’’, ‘‘Coffee, green bean’’,
the tolerance in this final rule, do not consensus standards pursuant to section ‘‘Mango’’, and ‘‘Papaya’’ to the table in
require the issuance of a proposed rule, 12(d) of the National Technology paragraph (a), and add footnote 1 to the
the requirements of the Regulatory Transfer and Advancement Act table to read as follows:
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
seq.), do not apply. § 180.666 Fluxapyroxad; tolerances for
This action directly regulates growers, VII. Congressional Review Act residues.
food processors, food handlers, and food Pursuant to the Congressional Review
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does (a) * * *
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
this action alter the relationships or submit a report containing this rule and Parts per
distribution of power and other required information to the U.S. Commodity million
responsibilities established by Congress Senate, the U.S. House of
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA Representatives, and the Comptroller
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency General of the United States prior to * * * * *
has determined that this action will not publication of the rule in the Federal Banana 1 ..................................... 3.0
have a substantial direct effect on States Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
or tribal governments, on the rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). * * * * *
relationship between the national Coffee, green bean 1 ................... 0.2
government and the States or tribal List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
governments, or on the distribution of * * * * *
Environmental protection, Mango 1 ....................................... 0.7
power and responsibilities among the Administrative practice and procedure,
various levels of government or between Agricultural commodities, Pesticides * * * * *
the Federal Government and Indian and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping Papaya 1 ...................................... 0.6
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined requirements.
that Executive Order 13132, entitled * * * * *
Dated: October 24, 2016.
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175, Daniel J. Rosenblatt, 1 There
are no U.S. registrations for this
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office commodity as of November 8, 2016.
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR of Pesticide Programs. * * * * *
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is [FR Doc. 2016–26966 Filed 11–7–16; 8:45 am]
to this action. In addition, this action amended as follows: BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Lhorne on DSK30JT082PROD with RULES
VerDate Sep<11>2014 14:19 Nov 07, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM 08NOR1](https://thefederalregister.org/doc/81_FR_78725/page/5.svg)
Document Created: 2018-02-14 08:23:47
Document Modified: 2018-02-14 08:23:47
| Category | Regulatory Information | |
| Collection | Federal Register | |
| sudoc Class | AE 2.7: GS 4.107: AE 2.106: | |
| Publisher | Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration | |
| Section | Rules and Regulations | |
| Action | Final rule. | |
| Dates | This regulation is effective November 8, 2016. Objections and requests for hearings must be received on or before January 9, 2017, and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION). | |
| Contact | Michael Goodis, Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; main telephone | |
| FR Citation | 81 FR 78509 | |
| CFR Associated | Environmental Protection; Administrative Practice and Procedure; Agricultural Commodities; Pesticides and Pests and Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements |
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR