81_FR_78995 81 FR 78778 - Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews

81 FR 78778 - Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration

Federal Register Volume 81, Issue 217 (November 9, 2016)

Page Range78778-78789
FR Document2016-27004

The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') has received requests to conduct administrative reviews of various antidumping and countervailing duty orders and findings with September anniversary dates. In accordance with the Department's regulations, we are initiating those administrative reviews.

Federal Register, Volume 81 Issue 217 (Wednesday, November 9, 2016) 
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 9, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78778-78789]
From the Federal Register Online  [www.thefederalregister.org]
[FR Doc No: 2016-27004]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Reviews

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') has received 
requests to conduct administrative reviews of various antidumping and 
countervailing duty orders and findings with September anniversary 
dates. In accordance with the Department's regulations, we are 
initiating those administrative reviews.

DATES: Effective November 9, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD 
Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, 
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 
Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: 
(202) 482-4735.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The Department has received timely requests, in accordance with 19 
CFR 351.213(b), for administrative reviews of various antidumping and 
countervailing duty orders and findings with September anniversary 
dates.
    All deadlines for the submission of various types of information, 
certifications, or comments or actions by the Department discussed 
below refer to the number of calendar days from the applicable starting 
time.

[[Page 78779]]

Notice of No Sales

    If a producer or exporter named in this notice of initiation had no 
exports, sales, or entries during the period of review (``POR''), it 
must notify the Department within 30 days of publication of this notice 
in the Federal Register. All submissions must be filed electronically 
at http://access.trade.gov in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303.\1\ Such 
submissions are subject to verification in accordance with section 
782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). Further, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(1)(i), a copy must be served on every 
party on the Department's service list.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order 
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Respondent Selection

    In the event the Department limits the number of respondents for 
individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to 
requests made for the orders identified below, the Department intends 
to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and Border Protection 
(``CBP'') data for U.S. imports during the period of review. We intend 
to place the CBP data on the record within five days of publication of 
the initiation notice and to make our decision regarding respondent 
selection within 30 days of publication of the initiation Federal 
Register notice. Comments regarding the CBP data and respondent 
selection should be submitted seven days after the placement of the CBP 
data on the record of this review. Parties wishing to submit rebuttal 
comments should submit those comments five days after the deadline for 
the initial comments.
    In the event the Department decides it is necessary to limit 
individual examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection 
under section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
    In general, the Department has found that determinations concerning 
whether particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as 
a single entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) 
require a substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, 
which often require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, the 
Department will not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent 
selection phase of this review and will not collapse companies at the 
respondent selection phase unless there has been a determination to 
collapse certain companies in a previous segment of this antidumping 
proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review, new shipper 
review or changed circumstances review). For any company subject to 
this review, if the Department determined, or continued to treat, that 
company as collapsed with others, the Department will assume that such 
companies continue to operate in the same manner and will collapse them 
for respondent selection purposes. Otherwise, the Department will not 
collapse companies for purposes of respondent selection. Parties are 
requested to (a) identify which companies subject to review previously 
were collapsed, and (b) provide a citation to the proceeding in which 
they were collapsed. Further, if companies are requested to complete 
the Quantity and Value (``Q&V'') Questionnaire for purposes of 
respondent selection, in general each company must report volume and 
value data separately for itself. Parties should not include data for 
any other party, even if they believe they should be treated as a 
single entity with that other party. If a company was collapsed with 
another company or companies in the most recently completed segment of 
this proceeding where the Department considered collapsing that entity, 
complete Q&V data for that collapsed entity must be submitted.

Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that has requested a 
review may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of 
publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The 
regulation provides that the Department may extend this time if it is 
reasonable to do so. In order to provide parties additional certainty 
with respect to when the Department will exercise its discretion to 
extend this 90-day deadline, interested parties are advised that the 
Department does not intend to extend the 90-day deadline unless the 
requestor demonstrates that an extraordinary circumstance has prevented 
it from submitting a timely withdrawal request. Determinations by the 
Department to extend the 90-day deadline will be made on a case-by-case 
basis.

Separate Rates

    In proceedings involving non-market economy (``NME'') countries, 
the Department begins with a rebuttable presumption that all companies 
within the country are subject to government control and, thus, should 
be assigned a single antidumping duty deposit rate. It is the 
Department's policy to assign all exporters of merchandise subject to 
an administrative review in an NME country this single rate unless an 
exporter can demonstrate that it is sufficiently independent so as to 
be entitled to a separate rate.
    To establish whether a firm is sufficiently independent from 
government control of its export activities to be entitled to a 
separate rate, the Department analyzes each entity exporting the 
subject merchandise under a test arising from the Final Determination 
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Sparklers from the People's Republic 
of China, 56 FR 20588 (May 6, 1991), as amplified by Final 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Silicon Carbide from 
the People's Republic of China, 59 FR 22585 (May 2, 1994). In 
accordance with the separate rates criteria, the Department assigns 
separate rates to companies in NME cases only if respondents can 
demonstrate the absence of both de jure and de facto government control 
over export activities.
    All firms listed below that wish to qualify for separate rate 
status in the administrative reviews involving NME countries must 
complete, as appropriate, either a separate rate application or 
certification, as described below. For these administrative reviews, in 
order to demonstrate separate rate eligibility, the Department requires 
entities for whom a review was requested, that were assigned a separate 
rate in the most recent segment of this proceeding in which they 
participated, to certify that they continue to meet the criteria for 
obtaining a separate rate. The Separate Rate Certification form will be 
available on the Department's Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/nme-sep-rate.html on the date of publication of this Federal 
Register notice. In responding to the certification, please follow the 
``Instructions for Filing the Certification'' in the Separate Rate 
Certification. Separate Rate Certifications are due to the Department 
no later than 30 calendar days after publication of this Federal 
Register notice. The deadline and requirement for submitting a 
Certification applies equally to NME-owned firms, wholly foreign-owned 
firms, and foreign sellers who purchase and export subject merchandise 
to the United States.
    Entities that currently do not have a separate rate from a 
completed segment of the proceeding \2\ should timely file a

[[Page 78780]]

Separate Rate Application to demonstrate eligibility for a separate 
rate in this proceeding. In addition, companies that received a 
separate rate in a completed segment of the proceeding that have 
subsequently made changes, including, but not limited to, changes to 
corporate structure, acquisitions of new companies or facilities, or 
changes to their official company name,\3\ should timely file a 
Separate Rate Application to demonstrate eligibility for a separate 
rate in this proceeding. The Separate Rate Status Application will be 
available on the Department's Web site at http://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/nme-sep-rate.html on the date of publication of this Federal 
Register notice. In responding to the Separate Rate Status Application, 
refer to the instructions contained in the application. Separate Rate 
Status Applications are due to the Department no later than 30 calendar 
days of publication of this Federal Register notice. The deadline and 
requirement for submitting a Separate Rate Status Application applies 
equally to NME-owned firms, wholly foreign-owned firms, and foreign 
sellers that purchase and export subject merchandise to the United 
States.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Such entities include entities that have not participated in 
the proceeding, entities that were preliminarily granted a separate 
rate in any currently incomplete segment of the proceeding (e.g., an 
ongoing administrative review, new shipper review, etc.) and 
entities that lost their separate rate in the most recently 
completed segment of the proceeding in which they participated.
    \3\ Only changes to the official company name, rather than trade 
names, need to be addressed via a Separate Rate Application. 
Information regarding new trade names may be submitted via a 
Separate Rate Certification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For exporters and producers who submit a separate-rate status 
application or certification and subsequently are selected as mandatory 
respondents, these exporters and producers will no longer be eligible 
for separate rate status unless they respond to all parts of the 
questionnaire as mandatory respondents.

Initiation of Reviews

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we are initiating 
administrative reviews of the following antidumping and countervailing 
duty orders and findings. We intend to issue the final results of these 
reviews not later than September 30, 2017.
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

[[Page 78781]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09NO16.019


[[Page 78782]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09NO16.020


[[Page 78783]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09NO16.021


[[Page 78784]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09NO16.022


[[Page 78785]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09NO16.023


[[Page 78786]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09NO16.024


[[Page 78787]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09NO16.025


[[Page 78788]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN09NO16.026

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-C

Duty Absorption Reviews

    During any administrative review covering all or part of a period 
falling between the first and second or third and fourth anniversary of 
the publication of an antidumping duty order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a 
determination under 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or 
suspended investigation (after sunset review), the Secretary, if 
requested by a domestic interested party within 30 days of the date of 
publication of the notice of initiation of the review, will determine, 
consistent with FAG Italia v. United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed Cir. 
2002), as appropriate, whether antidumping duties have been absorbed by 
an exporter or producer subject to the review if the subject 
merchandise is sold in the United States through an importer that is 
affiliated with such exporter or producer. The request must include the 
name(s) of the exporter or producer for which the inquiry is requested.

Gap Period Liquidation

    For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no 
assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of 
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period, of 
the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the POR.

Administrative Protective Orders and Letters of Appearance

    Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under 
administrative protective orders in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On 
January 22, 2008, the Department published Antidumping and

[[Page 78789]]

Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Documents Submission Procedures; APO 
Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January 22, 2008). Those procedures apply to 
administrative reviews included in this notice of initiation. Parties 
wishing to participate in any of these administrative reviews should 
ensure that they meet the requirements of these procedures (e.g., the 
filing of separate letters of appearance as discussed at 19 CFR 
351.103(d)).

Revised Factual Information Requirements

    On April 10, 2013, the Department published Definition of Factual 
Information and Time Limits for Submission of Factual Information: 
Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, 2013), which modified two 
regulations related to antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings: 
The definition of factual information (19 CFR 351.102(b)(21)), and the 
time limits for the submission of factual information (19 CFR 351.301). 
The final rule identifies five categories of factual information in 19 
CFR 351.102(b)(21), which are summarized as follows: (i) Evidence 
submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted in 
support of allegations; (iii) publicly available information to value 
factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the adequacy of 
remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on the 
record by the Department; and (v) evidence other than factual 
information described in (i)-(iv). The final rule requires any party, 
when submitting factual information, to specify under which subsection 
of 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) the information is being submitted and, if the 
information is submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual 
information already on the record, to provide an explanation 
identifying the information already on the record that the factual 
information seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The final rule also 
modified 19 CFR 351.301 so that, rather than providing general time 
limits, there are specific time limits based on the type of factual 
information being submitted. These modifications are effective for all 
segments initiated on or after May 10, 2013. Please review the final 
rule, available at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to submitting factual information in this segment.
    Any party submitting factual information in an antidumping duty or 
countervailing duty proceeding must certify to the accuracy and 
completeness of that information.\10\ Parties are hereby reminded that 
revised certification requirements are in effect for company/government 
officials as well as their representatives. All segments of any 
antidumping duty or countervailing duty proceedings initiated on or 
after August 16, 2013, should use the formats for the revised 
certifications provided at the end of the Final Rule.\11\ The 
Department intends to reject factual submissions in any proceeding 
segments if the submitting party does not comply with applicable 
revised certification requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See section 782(b) of the Act.
    \11\ See Certification of Factual Information To Import 
Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (``Final Rule''); see also 
the frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available 
at http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Revised Extension of Time Limits Regulation

    On September 20, 2013, the Department modified its regulation 
concerning the extension of time limits for submissions in antidumping 
and countervailing duty proceedings: Final Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 
20, 2013). The modification clarifies that parties may request an 
extension of time limits before a time limit established under Part 351 
expires, or as otherwise specified by the Secretary. In general, an 
extension request will be considered untimely if it is filed after the 
time limit established under Part 351 expires. For submissions which 
are due from multiple parties simultaneously, an extension request will 
be considered untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on the due date. 
Examples include, but are not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal briefs, 
filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; (2) factual information to value 
factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure the adequacy of 
remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, clarification and correction filed pursuant 
to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) comments concerning the selection of a 
surrogate country and surrogate values and rebuttal; (4) comments 
concerning U.S. Customs and Border Protection data; and (5) quantity 
and value questionnaires. Under certain circumstances, the Department 
may elect to specify a different time limit by which extension requests 
will be considered untimely for submissions which are due from multiple 
parties simultaneously. In such a case, the Department will inform 
parties in the letter or memorandum setting forth the deadline 
(including a specified time) by which extension requests must be filed 
to be considered timely. This modification also requires that an 
extension request must be made in a separate, stand-alone submission, 
and clarifies the circumstances under which the Department will grant 
untimely-filed requests for the extension of time limits. These 
modifications are effective for all segments initiated on or after 
October 21, 2013. Please review the final rule, available at http://www.thefederalregister.org/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm, prior to 
submitting factual information in these segments.
    These initiations and this notice are in accordance with section 
751(a) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i).

    Dated: November 2, 2016.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2016-27004 Filed 11-8-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

78778 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 9, 2016 / Notices 351.218(d)(1)(i).5 AMES and Council magnitude of the margins likely to Dated: October 31, 2016. Tool, each, claimed interested party prevail if the orders were revoked, is Paul Piquado, status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act provided in the Issues and Decision Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and as a manufacturer in the United States Memorandum. The Issues and Decision Compliance. of a domestic like product. On August Memorandum is a public document and Appendix 1, 2016, the Department received an is on file electronically via Enforcement adequate substantive response from and Compliance’s Antidumping and List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and AMES and Council Tool within the 30- Decision Memorandum Countervailing Duty Centralized day deadline specified in 19 CFR Electronic Services System (‘‘ACCESS’’). I. Summary 351.218(d)(3)(i).6 The Department II. Background ACCESS is available to registered users III. Scope of the Orders received no substantive responses from at http://iaaccess.trade.gov and to all respondent interested parties. As a IV. History of the Orders parties in the Central Records Unit, V. Legal Framework result, the Department conducted an Room B0824 of the main Department of VI. Discussion of the Issues expedited (120-day) sunset review of the 1. Likelihood of Continuation or Commerce building. In addition, a AD Orders, pursuant to section Recurrence of Dumping 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR complete version of the Issues and 2. Magnitude of the Margins Likely to 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2). Decision Memorandum can be accessed Prevail on the Internet at http:// VII. Final Results of Review Scope of the Orders enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed VIII. Recommendation The merchandise covered by these Issues and Decision Memorandum and [FR Doc. 2016–27079 Filed 11–8–16; 8:45 am] orders are hand tools comprising the the electronic version of the Issues and BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P following classes or kinds of Decision Memorandum are identical in merchandise: (1) Hammers and sledges content. with heads over 1.5 kg (3.33 pounds); DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (2) bars over 18 inches in length, track Final Results of Sunset Review tools and wedges; (3) picks and Pursuant to section 751(c)(1) and International Trade Administration mattocks; and (4) axes, adzes and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, the similar hewing tools. Subject hand tools Initiation of Antidumping and Department determines that revocation Countervailing Duty Administrative are manufactured through a hot forge of the AD Orders would be likely to lead operation in which steel is sheared to Reviews to continuation or recurrence of required length, heated to forging dumping, and that the magnitude of the AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, temperature, and formed to final shape dumping margins likely to prevail International Trade Administration, on forging equipment using dies specific would be weighted-average margins up Department of Commerce. to the desired product shape and size. These products are classifiable under to those listed in the chart below: SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce tariff article codes 8205.20.60, (‘‘the Department’’) has received 8205.59.30, 8201.30.00, and 8201.40.60 Weighted- requests to conduct administrative average reviews of various antidumping and of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of HFHT Order margin the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although (percent) countervailing duty orders and findings the HTSUS subheadings are provided with September anniversary dates. In for convenience and customs purposes, Axes/Adzes ........................... 15.02 accordance with the Department’s the written description of the scope of Picks/Mattocks ...................... 50.81 regulations, we are initiating those this proceeding, which is contained in Bars/Wedges ........................ 31.76 administrative reviews. the accompanying Issues and Decision Hammers/Sledges ................ 45.42 DATES: Effective November 9, 2016. Memorandum, is dispositive.7 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Notification to Interested Parties Brenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Analysis of Comments Received Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, A complete discussion of all issues This notice serves as the only Enforcement and Compliance, raised in this sunset review, including reminder to parties subject to International Trade Administration, the likelihood of continuation or administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th recurrence of dumping in the event of of their responsibility concerning the Street and Constitution Avenue NW., revocation of the AD Orders and the return or destruction of proprietary Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) information disclosed under APO in 482–4735. 5 Pursuant 19 CFR 351.303(b)(1), because the 15- accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. day deadline fell on Saturday, July 16, 2016, a non- SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Timely notification of the return or business day, AMES’ submission that was filed on the next business day (i.e., Monday, July 18, 2016) destruction of APO materials, or Background was accepted as timely. conversion to judicial protective order, The Department has received timely 6 See AMES’ and Council Tool’s August 1, 2016 is hereby requested. Failure to comply requests, in accordance with 19 CFR submissions. 7 See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy with the regulations and terms of an 351.213(b), for administrative reviews of Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and APO is a violation which is subject to various antidumping and countervailing Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, sanction. duty orders and findings with sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Fourth Expedited Sunset Review of We are issuing and publishing these September anniversary dates. the Antidumping Duty Orders on Heavy Forged results and notice in accordance with All deadlines for the submission of Hand Tools, Finished or Unfinished, With or sections 751(c), 752(c), and 777(i)(1) of various types of information, Without Handles From the People’s Republic of certifications, or comments or actions by China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the the Act, 19 CFR 351.218, and 19 CFR Final Results,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 351.221(c)(5)(ii). the Department discussed below refer to adopted by, this notice (‘‘Issues and Decision the number of calendar days from the Memorandum’’). applicable starting time. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Nov 08, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM 09NON1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 9, 2016 / Notices 78779 Notice of No Sales proceeding (i.e., investigation, administrative review in an NME If a producer or exporter named in administrative review, new shipper country this single rate unless an this notice of initiation had no exports, review or changed circumstances exporter can demonstrate that it is sales, or entries during the period of review). For any company subject to this sufficiently independent so as to be review (‘‘POR’’), it must notify the review, if the Department determined, entitled to a separate rate. Department within 30 days of or continued to treat, that company as To establish whether a firm is publication of this notice in the Federal collapsed with others, the Department sufficiently independent from Register. All submissions must be filed will assume that such companies government control of its export electronically at http://access.trade.gov continue to operate in the same manner activities to be entitled to a separate in accordance with 19 CFR 351.303.1 and will collapse them for respondent rate, the Department analyzes each Such submissions are subject to selection purposes. Otherwise, the entity exporting the subject verification in accordance with section Department will not collapse companies merchandise under a test arising from 782(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as for purposes of respondent selection. the Final Determination of Sales at Less amended (‘‘the Act’’). Further, in Parties are requested to (a) identify Than Fair Value: Sparklers from the accordance with 19 CFR 351.303(f)(1)(i), which companies subject to review People’s Republic of China, 56 FR 20588 a copy must be served on every party on previously were collapsed, and (b) (May 6, 1991), as amplified by Final the Department’s service list. provide a citation to the proceeding in Determination of Sales at Less Than which they were collapsed. Further, if Fair Value: Silicon Carbide from the Respondent Selection companies are requested to complete People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 22585 In the event the Department limits the the Quantity and Value (‘‘Q&V’’) (May 2, 1994). In accordance with the number of respondents for individual Questionnaire for purposes of separate rates criteria, the Department examination for administrative reviews respondent selection, in general each assigns separate rates to companies in initiated pursuant to requests made for company must report volume and value NME cases only if respondents can the orders identified below, the data separately for itself. Parties should demonstrate the absence of both de jure Department intends to select not include data for any other party, and de facto government control over respondents based on U.S. Customs and even if they believe they should be export activities. Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) data for U.S. treated as a single entity with that other All firms listed below that wish to imports during the period of review. We party. If a company was collapsed with qualify for separate rate status in the intend to place the CBP data on the another company or companies in the administrative reviews involving NME record within five days of publication of most recently completed segment of this countries must complete, as proceeding where the Department appropriate, either a separate rate the initiation notice and to make our considered collapsing that entity, application or certification, as described decision regarding respondent selection complete Q&V data for that collapsed below. For these administrative reviews, within 30 days of publication of the entity must be submitted. in order to demonstrate separate rate initiation Federal Register notice. eligibility, the Department requires Comments regarding the CBP data and Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for entities for whom a review was respondent selection should be Administrative Review requested, that were assigned a separate submitted seven days after the Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a rate in the most recent segment of this placement of the CBP data on the record party that has requested a review may proceeding in which they participated, of this review. Parties wishing to submit withdraw that request within 90 days of to certify that they continue to meet the rebuttal comments should submit those the date of publication of the notice of criteria for obtaining a separate rate. The comments five days after the deadline initiation of the requested review. The Separate Rate Certification form will be for the initial comments. regulation provides that the Department available on the Department’s Web site In the event the Department decides may extend this time if it is reasonable at http://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/ it is necessary to limit individual to do so. In order to provide parties nme-sep-rate.html on the date of examination of respondents and additional certainty with respect to publication of this Federal Register conduct respondent selection under when the Department will exercise its notice. In responding to the section 777A(c)(2) of the Act: discretion to extend this 90-day certification, please follow the In general, the Department has found deadline, interested parties are advised ‘‘Instructions for Filing the that determinations concerning whether that the Department does not intend to Certification’’ in the Separate Rate particular companies should be extend the 90-day deadline unless the Certification. Separate Rate ‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single requestor demonstrates that an Certifications are due to the Department entity for purposes of calculating extraordinary circumstance has no later than 30 calendar days after antidumping duty rates) require a prevented it from submitting a timely publication of this Federal Register substantial amount of detailed withdrawal request. Determinations by notice. The deadline and requirement information and analysis, which often the Department to extend the 90-day for submitting a Certification applies require follow-up questions and deadline will be made on a case-by-case equally to NME-owned firms, wholly analysis. Accordingly, the Department basis. foreign-owned firms, and foreign sellers will not conduct collapsing analyses at who purchase and export subject the respondent selection phase of this Separate Rates merchandise to the United States. review and will not collapse companies In proceedings involving non-market Entities that currently do not have a at the respondent selection phase unless economy (‘‘NME’’) countries, the sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES separate rate from a completed segment there has been a determination to Department begins with a rebuttable of the proceeding 2 should timely file a collapse certain companies in a presumption that all companies within previous segment of this antidumping the country are subject to government 2 Such entities include entities that have not control and, thus, should be assigned a participated in the proceeding, entities that were 1 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty preliminarily granted a separate rate in any Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures; single antidumping duty deposit rate. It currently incomplete segment of the proceeding Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR is the Department’s policy to assign all (e.g., an ongoing administrative review, new 39263 (July 6, 2011). exporters of merchandise subject to an Continued VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Nov 08, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM 09NON1

78780 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 9, 2016 / Notices Separate Rate Application to to demonstrate eligibility for a separate and export subject merchandise to the demonstrate eligibility for a separate rate in this proceeding. The Separate United States. rate in this proceeding. In addition, Rate Status Application will be For exporters and producers who companies that received a separate rate available on the Department’s Web site submit a separate-rate status application in a completed segment of the at http://enforcement.trade.gov/nme/ or certification and subsequently are proceeding that have subsequently nme-sep-rate.html on the date of selected as mandatory respondents, made changes, including, but not publication of this Federal Register these exporters and producers will no limited to, changes to corporate notice. In responding to the Separate longer be eligible for separate rate status structure, acquisitions of new Rate Status Application, refer to the unless they respond to all parts of the companies or facilities, or changes to instructions contained in the questionnaire as mandatory their official company name,3 should application. Separate Rate Status respondents. timely file a Separate Rate Application Applications are due to the Department Initiation of Reviews no later than 30 calendar days of In accordance with 19 CFR shipper review, etc.) and entities that lost their publication of this Federal Register 351.221(c)(1)(i), we are initiating separate rate in the most recently completed notice. The deadline and requirement segment of the proceeding in which they administrative reviews of the following participated. for submitting a Separate Rate Status antidumping and countervailing duty 3 Only changes to the official company name, Application applies equally to NME- orders and findings. We intend to issue rather than trade names, need to be addressed via owned firms, wholly foreign-owned the final results of these reviews not a Separate Rate Application. Information regarding new trade names may be submitted via a Separate firms, and foreign sellers that purchase later than September 30, 2017. Rate Certification. BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Nov 08, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM 09NON1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 9, 2016 / Notices 78781 Antidumping Duty Proceedings Period to be Reviewed INDIA: Certain Lined Paper Products A-533-843 9/1/15 - 8/31/16 Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products Pvt. Ltd. Lodha Offset Limited Magic International Pvt. Ltd. Marisa International Navneet Education Ltd. Pioneer Stationery Pvt. Ltd. SAB International SGM Paper Products Super Impex MEXICO: Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks A-201-837 9/1/15 - 8/31/16 Ferro Alliages & Mineraux Inc. RHI-Refmex SA de C.V. Trafinsa S.A. de C.V. Vesuvius Mexico S.A. de C.V. MEXICO: Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube 4 A-201-836 8/1/15- 7/31/16 Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V. REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Large Power Transformers 5 A-580-867 8/1/15- 7/31/16 Hyosung Corporation Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. ILJIN lljin Electric Co., Ltd. LSIS Co., Ltd. REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Oil Country Tubular Goods A-580-870 9/1/15 - 8/31/16 4 In the initiation notice that published on October 14, 2016 (81 FR 71061), the name of the review company was incorrect. The correct name is identified in this notice. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES 5 In the initiation notice that published on October 14, 2016 (81 FR 71061), the name of one of the review companies was missing from the list for this order. All of the review company names are identified in the list appearing in this notice. EN09NO16.019</GPH> VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Nov 08, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM 09NON1

78782 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 9, 2016 / Notices BDP International Daewoo America Daewoo International Corporation Dong-A Steel Co. Ltd. Dong Yang Steel Pipe Dongbu Incheon Steel DSEC Erndtebruecker Eisenwerk and Company Hansol Metal Husteel Co., Ltd. Hyundai RB Hyundai HYSCO Hyundai Steel Company ILJIN Steel Corporation Jim And Freight Co., Ltd. Kia Steel Co. Ltd. KSP Steel Company Kukje Steel Kurvers NEXTEEL Co., Ltd. POSCO Daewoo Corporation POSCO Daewoo America Sam sung Samsung C and T Corporation SeAH Besteel Corporation SeAH Steel Corporation Steel Canada Sumitomo Corporation TGS Pipe Y onghyun Base Materials ZEECO Asia SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM: Oil Country Tubular Goods A-552-817 9/1/15 - 8/31/16 Hoa Phat Steel Pipe Co., Ltd. Hot Rolling Pipe Co., Ltd. SeAH Steel Corporation SeAH Steel VINA Corporation Vina One Steel Manufacturing TAIWAN: Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge A-583-844 9/1/15 - 8/31/16 sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Fujian Rongshu Industry Co., Ltd. EN09NO16.020</GPH> VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Nov 08, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM 09NON1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 9, 2016 / Notices 78783 Maple Ribbon Co., Ltd. Roung Shu Industry Corporation Xiamen Yi-He Textile Co., Ltd. TAIWAN: Oil Country Tubular Goods A-583-850 9/1/15 - 8/31/16 Tension Steel Industries Co., Ltd. THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks A-570-954 9/1/15- 8/31/16 Fedmet Resources Corportion Fengchi Imp. And Exp. Co., Ltd. ofHaicheng City Fengchi Mining Co., Ltd. ofHaicheng City Fengchi Refractories Co., ofHaicheng City Dashiqiao City Guancheng Refractor Co., Ltd. (aka Dashiqiao City Guancheng Refractory Co., Ltd.) Jiangsu Sujia Group New Materials Co.,Ltd. Liaoning Fucheng Refractories Group Co., Ltd. Liaoning Fucheng Special Refractory Co., Ltd. Liaoning Jiayi Metals & Minerals Co., Ltd. Puyang Refractories Group Co., Ltd. RHI Refractories Liaoning Co., Ltd. Yingkou Bayuquan Refractories Co., Ltd. Yingkou Dalmond Refractories Co., Ltd. Yingkou Guangyang Co., Ltd. Yingkou Jiahe Refractories Co., Ltd. Yingkou Kyushu Refractories Co., Ltd. Yingkou New Century Refractories Ltd. Yingkou Wonjin Refractory Material Co., Ltd. THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Certain New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires A-570-912 9/1/15- 8/31/16 Cheng Shin Rubber Industry Ltd. Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. Guizhou Tyre Import and Export Co., Ltd. Qingdao Milestone Tyres Co. Ltd. Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co. Ltd. Shandong Zhentai Group Co., Ltd. Trelleborg Wheel Systems (Xingtai) Co., Ltd. Weihai Zhongwei Rubber Co., Ltd. Weifang Jintongda Tyre Co., Ltd. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Zhongce Rubber Group Company Limited EN09NO16.021</GPH> VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Nov 08, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM 09NON1

78784 Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 217 /Wednesday, November 9, 2016 /Notices THE PEOPLE‘S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat A—570—848 9/1/15 — 8/31/16 China Kingdom (Beijing) Import & Export Co., Ltd. Deyan Aquatic Products and Food Co., Ltd. Hubei Nature Agriculture Industry Co., Ltd. Hubei Qianjiang Huashan Aquatic Food and Product Co.,Ltd. Hubei Yuesheng Aquatic Products Co., Ltd. Nanjing Gemsen International Co., Ltd. Shanghai Ocean Flavor International Trading Co., Ltd. Weishan Hongda Aquatic Food Co., Ltd. Xiping Opeck Food Co., Ltd. Xuzhou Jinjiang Foodstuffs Co., Ltd. Yancheng Hi—King Agriculture Developing Co., Ltd. THE PEOPLE‘S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Narrow Woven Ribbons with Woven Selvedge A—570—952° 9/1/15 — 8/31/16 Huzhou BeiHeng Textile Co., Ltd. Huzhou Kingdom Coating Industry Co., Ltd. Huzhou Siny Label Material Co., Ltd. Huzhou Unifull Label Fabric Co., Ltd. THE PEOPLE‘S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires‘ A—570—016 1/27/15 — 7/31/16 Shandong Yongtai Chemical Co., Ltd. TURKEY: Oil Country Tubular Goods A—489—816 9/1/15 — 8/31/16 Tosgelik Profil ve Sac Endiustrisi A.S. Tosyali Dig Ticaret A.S$. ° In the Investigation of sales at less than fair value the Department determined that Yama Ribbons and Bows Co., Ltd. was not selling at less than fair value. Thus, Yama Ribbons and Bows Co., Ltd. was excluded from the order and the exclusion applied to merchandise produced and exported by Yama Ribbons and Bows Co., Ltd. Merchandise which Yama Ribbons and Bows Co., Ltd. exports but did not produce, as well as merchandise Yama Ribbons and Bows Co., Ltd. produces but is exported by another company, remain subjectto this antidumping order. See Narrow Woven Ribbons With Woven Selvedge From Taiwan and the People‘s Republic of China: Amended Antidumping Duty Orders, 75 FR 56982, 56984 (September 17, 2010) ‘ The name of this company was listed incorrectly in the initiation notice that published on October 14, 2016 (81 FR 71061). The correct name of the company is listed in this notice.

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 9, 2016 / Notices 78785 UKRAINE: Silicomanganese 8& 9 A-823-805 8/1/15- 7/31/16 PJSC Zaporozhye Ferroalloy Plant Countervailing Duty Proceedings INDIA: Oil Country Tubular Goods C-533-858 1/1/15- 12/31/15 Jindal SAW Ltd. THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Certain Magnesia Carbon Bricks C-570-955 1/1/15 - 12/31/15 Fedmet Resources Corporation Fengchi Imp. and Exp. Co., Ltd. ofHaicheng City Fengchi Mining Co., Ltd. ofHaicheng City Fengchi Refractories Co., ofHaicheng City Dashiqiao City Guacheng Refractory Co., Ltd. (aka Dashiqiao City Guancheng Refractory Co., Ltd.) Jiangsu Sujia Group New Materials Co., Ltd. Liaoning Fucheng Refractories Group Co., Ltd. Liaoning Fucheng Special Refractory Co., Ltd. Liaoning Jiayi Metals & Minerals Co., Ltd. Puyang Refractories Group Co., Ltd. RHI Refractories Liaoning Co., Ltd Yingkou Bayuquan Refractories Co., Ltd. Yingkou Dalmond Refractores Co., Ltd. Yingkou Guangyang Co., Ltd. Yingkou Jiahe Refractories Co., Ltd. Yingkou Kyushu Refractories Co., Ltd. Yingkou New Century Refractories Ltd. Yingkou Wonjin Refractory Material Co., Ltd. THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA: Certain New Pneumatic Off-The-Road Tires C-570-913 1/1/15- 12/31/15 Aeolus Tyre Co., Ltd. Air Sea Transport Inc Air Sea Worldwide Logistics Ltd 8 In the initiation notice that published on October 14, 2016 (81 FR71061) the POR for the above referenced case was incorrect. The period listed above is the correct POR for this case. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES 9 The company listed above was misspelled in the initiation notice that published on October 14,2016 (81 FR 71061). The correct spelling of the company is listed in this notice. EN09NO16.023</GPH> VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Nov 08, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM 09NON1

78786 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 9, 2016 / Notices AM Global Shipping Lines Apex Maritime Co Ltd Apex Maritime Thailand Co Ltd BDP Intl LTD China Beijing Kang Jie Kong Intl Cargo Agent Co Ltd C&D Intl Freight Forward Inc Caeasar Intl Logistics Co Ltd Caterpillar & Paving Products Xuzhou Ltd CH Robinson Freight Services China LTD Changzhou Kafurter Machinery Co Ltd Cheng Shin Rubber (Xiamen) Ind Ltd China Intl Freight Co Ltd Chonche Auto Double Happiness Tyre Corp Ltd City Ocean Logistics Co Ltd Consolidator Intl Co Ltd Crowntyre Industrial Co. Ltd CTS Intl Logistics Corp Daewoo Intl Corp De Well Container Shipping Inc Double Coin Holdings Ltd; Double Coin Group Shanghai Donghai Tyre Co., Ltd; and Double Coin Group Rugao Tyre Co., Ltd. (collectively "Double Coin") England Logistics (Qingdao) Co Ltd Extra Type Co Ltd Fedex International Freight Forwarding Services Shanghai Co Ltd FG Intl Logistics Ltd Global Container Line Guizhou Advance Rubber Co., Ltd. Guizhou Tyre Co., Ltd. Guizhou Tyre Import and Export Co., Ltd. Honour Lane Shipping Innova Rubber Co., Ltd. Inspire Intl Enterprise Co Ltd JHJ Intl Transporation Co Jiangsu Feichi Co. Ltd. Kenda Rubber (China) Co Ltd KS Holding Limited/KS Resources Limited Laizhou Xiongying Rubber Industry Co., Ltd. Landmax Intl Co Ltd LF Logistics China Co Ltd Mai Shandong Radial Tyre Co., Ltd. Maine Industrial Tire LLC Master Intl Logistics Co Ltd Melton Tire Co. Ltd Merityre Specialists Ltd sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Mid-America Overseas Shanghai Ltd Omni Export Ltd EN09NO16.024</GPH> VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Nov 08, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM 09NON1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 9, 2016 / Notices 78787 Orient Express Container Co Ltd Oriental Tyre Technology Limited Pudong Prime Intl Logistics Inc Q&J Industrial Group Co Ltd Qingdao Aotai Rubber Co Ltd Qingdao Apex Shipping Qingdao Chengtai Handtruck Co Ltd Qingdao Chunangtong Founding Co Ltd Qingdao Free Trade Zone Full-World International Trading Co., Ltd. Qingdao Haojia (Xinhai) Tyre Co. Qingdao Haomai Hongyi Mold Co Ltd Qingdao J&G Intl Trading Co Ltd Qingdao Jinhaoyang International Co. Ltd Qingdao Kaoyoung Intl Logistics Co Ltd Qingdao Milestone Tyres Co LTd Qingdao Nexen Co Ltd Qingdao Qihang Tyre Co. Qingdao Qizhou Rubber Co., Ltd. Qingdao Shijikunyuan Intl Co Ltd Qingdao Sinorient Internationl Ltd. Qingdao Taifa Group Imp. And Exp. Co., Ltd./Qingdao Taifa Group Co., Ltd. Qingdao Wonderland Qingdao Zhenhua Barrow Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Rich Shipping Company RS Logistics Ltd Schenker China Ltd Seastar Intl Enterprise Ltd SGL Logistics South China Ltd Shandong Huitong Tyre Co., Ltd. Shandong Linglong Tyre Co., Ltd. Shandong Taishan Tyre Co., Ltd. Shanghai Cartee Industrail & Trading Co Ltd Shanghai Grand Sound Intl Transportation Co Ltd Shanghai Hua Shen Imp & Exp Co Ltd Shanghai Part-Rich Auto Parts Co Ltd Shanghai TCM Metals & Machinery Co Ltd Shantou Zhisheng Plastic Co Ltd Shiyan Desizheng Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Techking Tires Limited Thi Group (Shanghai) Ltd Tianjin Leviathan International Trade Co., Ltd. Tianjin United Tire & Rubber International Co., Ltd. Tianjin Wanda Tyre Group Co. Tianshui Hailin Import and Export Corporation sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES Tiremart Qingdao Inc Tiremart Shipping Inc EN09NO16.025</GPH> VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Nov 08, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4725 E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM 09NON1

78788 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 9, 2016 / Notices BILLING CODE 3510–DS–C determine, consistent with FAG Italia v. of antidumping or countervailing duties Duty Absorption Reviews United States, 291 F.3d 806 (Fed Cir. on entries of subject merchandise 2002), as appropriate, whether entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, During any administrative review antidumping duties have been absorbed for consumption during the relevant covering all or part of a period falling by an exporter or producer subject to the provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period, of between the first and second or third review if the subject merchandise is the order, if such a gap period is and fourth anniversary of the sold in the United States through an applicable to the POR. publication of an antidumping duty importer that is affiliated with such order under 19 CFR 351.211 or a Administrative Protective Orders and sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES exporter or producer. The request must determination under 19 CFR Letters of Appearance include the name(s) of the exporter or 351.218(f)(4) to continue an order or producer for which the inquiry is Interested parties must submit suspended investigation (after sunset requested. applications for disclosure under review), the Secretary, if requested by a administrative protective orders in domestic interested party within 30 Gap Period Liquidation accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. On days of the date of publication of the For the first administrative review of January 22, 2008, the Department EN09NO16.026</GPH> notice of initiation of the review, will any order, there will be no assessment published Antidumping and VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Nov 08, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM 09NON1

Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 217 / Wednesday, November 9, 2016 / Notices 78789 Countervailing Duty Proceedings: of that information.10 Parties are hereby which extension requests must be filed Documents Submission Procedures; reminded that revised certification to be considered timely. This APO Procedures, 73 FR 3634 (January requirements are in effect for company/ modification also requires that an 22, 2008). Those procedures apply to government officials as well as their extension request must be made in a administrative reviews included in this representatives. All segments of any separate, stand-alone submission, and notice of initiation. Parties wishing to antidumping duty or countervailing clarifies the circumstances under which participate in any of these duty proceedings initiated on or after the Department will grant untimely- administrative reviews should ensure August 16, 2013, should use the formats filed requests for the extension of time that they meet the requirements of these for the revised certifications provided at limits. These modifications are effective procedures (e.g., the filing of separate the end of the Final Rule.11 The for all segments initiated on or after letters of appearance as discussed at 19 Department intends to reject factual October 21, 2013. Please review the CFR 351.103(d)). submissions in any proceeding final rule, available at http:// segments if the submitting party does www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/ Revised Factual Information not comply with applicable revised html/2013-22853.htm, prior to Requirements certification requirements. submitting factual information in these On April 10, 2013, the Department Revised Extension of Time Limits segments. published Definition of Factual Regulation These initiations and this notice are Information and Time Limits for in accordance with section 751(a) of the On September 20, 2013, the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(a)) and 19 CFR Submission of Factual Information: Department modified its regulation 351.221(c)(1)(i). Final Rule, 78 FR 21246 (April 10, concerning the extension of time limits 2013), which modified two regulations for submissions in antidumping and Dated: November 2, 2016. related to antidumping and countervailing duty proceedings: Final Christian Marsh, countervailing duty proceedings: The Rule, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013). Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping definition of factual information (19 The modification clarifies that parties and Countervailing Duty Operations. CFR 351.102(b)(21)), and the time limits may request an extension of time limits [FR Doc. 2016–27004 Filed 11–8–16; 8:45 am] for the submission of factual before a time limit established under BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P information (19 CFR 351.301). The final Part 351 expires, or as otherwise rule identifies five categories of factual specified by the Secretary. In general, an information in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21), extension request will be considered DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE which are summarized as follows: (i) untimely if it is filed after the time limit Evidence submitted in response to established under Part 351 expires. For International Trade Administration questionnaires; (ii) evidence submitted submissions which are due from in support of allegations; (iii) publicly multiple parties simultaneously, an [A–552–802] available information to value factors extension request will be considered under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. on Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp the adequacy of remuneration under 19 the due date. Examples include, but are From the Socialist Republic of CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed not limited to: (1) Case and rebuttal Vietnam: Preliminary Results of on the record by the Department; and (v) briefs, filed pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309; Antidumping Duty Administrative evidence other than factual information (2) factual information to value factors Review; 2015–2016 described in (i)–(iv). The final rule under 19 CFR 351.408(c), or to measure AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, requires any party, when submitting the adequacy of remuneration under 19 International Trade Administration, factual information, to specify under CFR 351.511(a)(2), filed pursuant to 19 Department of Commerce. which subsection of 19 CFR CFR 351.301(c)(3) and rebuttal, SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 351.102(b)(21) the information is being clarification and correction filed (the Department) preliminarily submitted and, if the information is pursuant to 19 CFR 351.301(c)(3)(iv); (3) determines that none of the mandatory submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct comments concerning the selection of a respondents in this review qualify for a factual information already on the surrogate country and surrogate values separate rate and are, therefore, record, to provide an explanation and rebuttal; (4) comments concerning considered part of the Vietnam-Wide identifying the information already on U.S. Customs and Border Protection Entity for their exports of subject the record that the factual information data; and (5) quantity and value merchandise to the United States during seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct. The questionnaires. Under certain the period of review (POR) February 1, final rule also modified 19 CFR 351.301 circumstances, the Department may 2015, through January 31, 2016. If these so that, rather than providing general elect to specify a different time limit by preliminary results are adopted in the time limits, there are specific time limits which extension requests will be final results, the Department will based on the type of factual information considered untimely for submissions instruct U.S. Customs and Border being submitted. These modifications which are due from multiple parties Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping are effective for all segments initiated on simultaneously. In such a case, the duties on all appropriate entries of or after May 10, 2013. Please review the Department will inform parties in the subject merchandise during the POR. final rule, available at http:// letter or memorandum setting forth the Interested parties are invited to enforcement.trade.gov/frn/2013/ deadline (including a specified time) by comment on these preliminary results. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES 1304frn/2013-08227.txt, prior to DATES: Effective November 9, 2016. 10 See section 782(b) of the Act. submitting factual information in this 11 See Certification of Factual Information To FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: segment. Import Administration During Antidumping and Irene Gorelik, AD/CVD Operations, Any party submitting factual Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July Office VIII, Enforcement and information in an antidumping duty or 17, 2013) (‘‘Final Rule’’); see also the frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available Compliance, International Trade countervailing duty proceeding must at http://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_ Administration, U.S. Department of certify to the accuracy and completeness info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf. Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:29 Nov 08, 2016 Jkt 241001 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM 09NON1


Document Created: 2016-11-09 01:39:49
Document Modified: 2016-11-09 01:39:49
CategoryRegulatory Information
CollectionFederal Register
sudoc ClassAE 2.7:
GS 4.107:
AE 2.106:
PublisherOffice of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration
SectionNotices
DatesEffective November 9, 2016.
ContactBrenda E. Waters, Office of AD/CVD Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-4735.
FR Citation81 FR 78778 
2025 Federal Register | Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
USC | CFR | eCFR